Re: SwramWebApplication and session
Hi!
I am not sure what you mean, but we have like this:
/**
* @see com.myapp.MyApplication#newSession(org.apache.wicket.Request,
org.apache.wicket.Response)
*/
@Override
public Session newSession(Request request, Response response) {
return session = new MySession(request, response);
}
**
Martin
2011/1/20 jussi isokangas jussi.isokan...@gmail.com:
Hi,
My application extends SwramWebApplication. Session doesn't accpet that for
paramater. I need to use session for ShoppingCart.
How to solve it?
Regards Jussi
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How can i change lang attribute in html markup tag?
Try with : in .html: html wicket:id=html in .java: WebMarkupContainer htmlTag = new WebMarkupContainer(html); htmlTag.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(lang, getSession().getLocale().toString()); htmlTag.setTransparentResolver(true); // check the javadoc of this method On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Mike Mander wicket-m...@gmx.de wrote: With further investigation i found a hint on using an IMarkupFilter. Is there an example with this for my problem? Thanks Mike - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Submit form from other form onClick
Just add temporarily an AjaxButton to your form and see the generated HTML
for that button.
There you'll see the needed javascript.
I suggest you to leave the button and change your code to:
Wicket.$('%s').click(); } catch(err) { if (window.console !=
undefined) { console.log(err); } }, myAjaxButton.getMarkupId()));
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS]
berlin.br...@primerica.com wrote:
This works, thanks.
Another similar question based on your question.
Can I use an ajax form submit, maybe using a wicket javascript utility.
I guess I could use jquery but does wicket have something available.
E.g. as opposed to document.forms[xxx].submit(). Is there some generic
ajax submit I could use.
...
this.add(new AjaxLinkObject(nextLink) {
@Override
public void onClick(final AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
// Find the dynamic form on the page.
final Object objAtStopTraversal =
HomePage.this.visitChildren(new FindFormVisitor());
if (objAtStopTraversal instanceof Form?) {
// Form found, invoke javascript submit
final Form? form = (Form?)
objAtStopTraversal;
target.appendJavascript(String.format(try {
document.forms['%s'].submit(); } catch(err) { if (window.console !=
undefined) { console.log(err); } }, form.getMarkupId()));
}
}
} );
-Original Message-
From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:01 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Submit form from other form onClick
you can submit any form with pure javascript:
document.getElementById('myform').submit();
this will call the respective myForm.onSubmit() method at the server
side
at server side you may call directly your methods e.g.
new Form() {onSubmit() { myService.do(); }} new AjaxLink() {onClick() {
myService.do(); }} no need to call Wicket methods
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS]
berlin.br...@primerica.com wrote:
Is there a way to manually submit a form. E.g. normally we would have
action handler methods onSubmit (on a button or a form).
E.g.
new AjaxLink() {
onClick() {
someOtherForm.submit();
}
}
Berlin Brown
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Embedded jetty maven profile.xml
profile.xml sounds like Maven 1 ?! better ask in Jetty mailing lists 2011/1/21 Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş alt...@gmail.com I try to start jetty in embedded form but i have problems I need to read properties values in profile.xml before embedded jetty starts. Any suggestions ? Thanks. -- *Altuğ* *www.kodcu.com* http://www.kodcu.com**
DatePickerBehavior lost when toggling visibility
Hello I have a text field with jQuery DatePickerBehavior. When the page is loaded and the field is initially visible, the behavior works just fine. But when toggling the visibility from hidden to visible, the client function is gone. The little date packer icon is gone and so is the click event on the input field. What do I have to do? //Swanthe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How can i change lang attribute in html markup tag?
Am 21.01.2011 09:17, schrieb Martin Grigorov: Try with : in .html: html wicket:id=html in .java: WebMarkupContainer htmlTag = new WebMarkupContainer(html); htmlTag.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(lang, getSession().getLocale().toString()); htmlTag.setTransparentResolver(true); // check the javadoc of this method On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Mike Manderwicket-m...@gmx.de wrote: Thanks Martin for your reply. But i couldn't find WebMarkupContainer.setTransparentResolver There is only a Border.setTransparentResolver in wicket 1.4.15 Thanks Mike - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How can i change lang attribute in html markup tag?
Yes, sorry.
You need to override
#isTransparentResolver()
WebMarkupContainer htmlTag = new WebMarkupContainer(html) {
public boolean isTransparentResolver()
{
return true;
}
};
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Mike Mander wicket-m...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 21.01.2011 09:17, schrieb Martin Grigorov:
Try with :
in .html:
html wicket:id=html
in .java:
WebMarkupContainer htmlTag = new WebMarkupContainer(html);
htmlTag.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(lang,
getSession().getLocale().toString());
htmlTag.setTransparentResolver(true); // check the javadoc of this method
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Mike Manderwicket-m...@gmx.de wrote:
Thanks Martin for your reply.
But i couldn't find
WebMarkupContainer.setTransparentResolver
There is only a Border.setTransparentResolver in wicket 1.4.15
Thanks
Mike
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DatePickerBehavior lost when toggling visibility
How do you toggle visibility? Replacing panels via AJAX or client side JavaScript? The AJAX way will work for sure. I think via JavaScript you will have to manually recreate it when making it visible Ernesto On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Swanthe Lindgren swanthe.lindg...@megasol.se wrote: Hello I have a text field with jQuery DatePickerBehavior. When the page is loaded and the field is initially visible, the behavior works just fine. But when toggling the visibility from hidden to visible, the client function is gone. The little date packer icon is gone and so is the click event on the input field. What do I have to do? //Swanthe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DatePickerBehavior lost when toggling visibility
A drop down box fires an AJAX request and the text field with the date picker has an overridden isVisible() method. On 2011-01-21 12:35, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote: How do you toggle visibility? Replacing panels via AJAX or client side JavaScript? The AJAX way will work for sure. I think via JavaScript you will have to manually recreate it when making it visible Ernesto On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Swanthe Lindgren swanthe.lindg...@megasol.se wrote: Hello I have a text field with jQuery DatePickerBehavior. When the page is loaded and the field is initially visible, the behavior works just fine. But when toggling the visibility from hidden to visible, the client function is gone. The little date packer icon is gone and so is the click event on the input field. What do I have to do? //Swanthe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DatePickerBehavior lost when toggling visibility
Are you using wiquery? If so, can you show me your code or send me a simplified Panel showing this behavior? I use wiquery datepickers on my applications in combination with via AJAX replacements and do not have this issue. Ernesto On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Swanthe Lindgren swanthe.lindg...@megasol.se wrote: A drop down box fires an AJAX request and the text field with the date picker has an overridden isVisible() method. On 2011-01-21 12:35, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote: How do you toggle visibility? Replacing panels via AJAX or client side JavaScript? The AJAX way will work for sure. I think via JavaScript you will have to manually recreate it when making it visible Ernesto On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Swanthe Lindgren swanthe.lindg...@megasol.se wrote: Hello I have a text field with jQuery DatePickerBehavior. When the page is loaded and the field is initially visible, the behavior works just fine. But when toggling the visibility from hidden to visible, the client function is gone. The little date packer icon is gone and so is the click event on the input field. What do I have to do? //Swanthe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: DatePickerBehavior lost when toggling visibility
A drop down box fires an AJAX request and the text field with the date picker has an overridden isVisible() method. You have used setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true) on the component that visibility is toggled for yes? - Tor Iver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DatePickerBehavior lost when toggling visibility
I have just changed to jQuery DatePickerBehavior from wicket extensions YUI DatePicker, which of course worked just fine in this scenario, but since I want some of the customizations available in jQuery we made a switch. On 2011-01-21 12:49, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote: Are you using wiquery? If so, can you show me your code or send me a simplified Panel showing this behavior? I use wiquery datepickers on my applications in combination with via AJAX replacements and do not have this issue. Ernesto On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Swanthe Lindgren swanthe.lindg...@megasol.se wrote: A drop down box fires an AJAX request and the text field with the date picker has an overridden isVisible() method. On 2011-01-21 12:35, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote: How do you toggle visibility? Replacing panels via AJAX or client side JavaScript? The AJAX way will work for sure. I think via JavaScript you will have to manually recreate it when making it visible Ernesto On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Swanthe Lindgren swanthe.lindg...@megasol.sewrote: Hello I have a text field with jQuery DatePickerBehavior. When the page is loaded and the field is initially visible, the behavior works just fine. But when toggling the visibility from hidden to visible, the client function is gone. The little date packer icon is gone and so is the click event on the input field. What do I have to do? //Swanthe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How can i change lang attribute in html markup tag?
Great Martin. Thanks alot it works as expected.
My solution:
LocalizedHtmlTag.java
import org.apache.wicket.behavior.SimpleAttributeModifier;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WebMarkupContainer;
public class LocalizedHtmlTag extends WebMarkupContainer {
public LocalizedHtmlTag(String id) {
super(id);
String language = getSession().getLocale().getLanguage();
add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(lang, language));
add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(xml:lang, language));
}
@Override
public boolean isTransparentResolver() {
return true;
}
}
MyPage.java
public class MyPage extends WebPage {
public MyPage() {
add(new LocalizedHtmlTag(html));
}
}
MyPage.html
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ?
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
html wicket:id=html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.4-strict.dtd;
/html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DatePickerBehavior lost when toggling visibility
A said: this works fine on my applications using latest versions of wiquery DatePicker [(see 1]) + AJAX replacements. 1-http://www.google.com/codesearch/p?hl=en#pdLMIUTpzpE/trunk/src/main/java/org/odlabs/wiquery/ui/datepicker/DatePicker.java Ernesto On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Swanthe Lindgren swanthe.lindg...@megasol.se wrote: I have just changed to jQuery DatePickerBehavior from wicket extensions YUI DatePicker, which of course worked just fine in this scenario, but since I want some of the customizations available in jQuery we made a switch. On 2011-01-21 12:49, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote: Are you using wiquery? If so, can you show me your code or send me a simplified Panel showing this behavior? I use wiquery datepickers on my applications in combination with via AJAX replacements and do not have this issue. Ernesto On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Swanthe Lindgren swanthe.lindg...@megasol.se wrote: A drop down box fires an AJAX request and the text field with the date picker has an overridden isVisible() method. On 2011-01-21 12:35, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote: How do you toggle visibility? Replacing panels via AJAX or client side JavaScript? The AJAX way will work for sure. I think via JavaScript you will have to manually recreate it when making it visible Ernesto On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Swanthe Lindgren swanthe.lindg...@megasol.se wrote: Hello I have a text field with jQuery DatePickerBehavior. When the page is loaded and the field is initially visible, the behavior works just fine. But when toggling the visibility from hidden to visible, the client function is gone. The little date packer icon is gone and so is the click event on the input field. What do I have to do? //Swanthe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
About AbstractLink
Hi all, I noticed some days ago that the AbstractLink component when disabled, render itself as a span. Is there some especific motivation for that ? I´m asking because I think that a component/element does not have to change itself in that way, its suposed to be a responsability of its holder, and any way, why a span ? All applications should render a span instead of an anchor when that anchor was disabled? Could I perhaps change it´s css class and strip its actions ? Or nor even render it ? Of course we can override the disableLink of AbstractLink (this is the method that does the magic), but it becomes a problem because now we *have* to do it. One of the characteristics that I like most in wicket is freedom, I can use whatever css and javascript the way I want, I can model my application in any way I like it, and this is a point of advantage of wicket over other frameworks, wicket is not pervasive, and the way that method is wrote is very pervasive. Cheers Heitor
Re: Question regarding AjaxFormSubmitBehavior
Many thanks for your feedback!
I am well aware of the fact that HTML spec actually does not allow nested
forms and that wicket is already doing great job while transforming those
nested forms into divs.
I also expected that the bigger form gets submitted as well but only the
nested one processed and the rest ignored, but that's not exactly what's
happening in our case.
The reason for this is that AjaxFormSubmitBehavior always delegates to the
#onFormSubmitted() of the root form
AjaxFormSubmitBehavior, line 135:
getForm().getRootForm().onFormSubmitted();
which then looks up if there is any enabled, visible
IFormSubmittingComponent in the hierarchy that has been triggered. Only in
case that one such IFormSubmittingComponent gets identified, it sets
*formToProcess* to the form of the identified submittingComponent and then
finally invokes
Form, line 920: formToProcess.process(submittingComponent);
The problem with our crazy liitle nested form ;) is that it does not have
any IFormSubmittingComponent but rather a TextField with
AjaxFormSubmitBehavior attached to its onchange event that should then
submit the nested form accordingly. This leads to formToProcess being left
assigned to the parentForm that then gets processed at the end:
- from Form#onFormSubmitted():
// this is the root form
Form? formToProcess = this;
// find out whether it was a nested form that was
submitted
if (submittingComponent != null)
{
formToProcess = submittingComponent.getForm();
}
// process the form for this request
formToProcess.process(submittingComponent);
We have in the meantime subclassed AjaxFormSubmitBehavior with our own
implementation of AjaxFormSubmitBehavior#onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget target)
method the only difference being the line 135 that was changed from
getForm().getRootForm().onFormSubmitted();
to
getForm().onFormSubmitted();
and did not experience any problems with it, at least so far ;)
Daniel
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:25 AM, jcgarciam jcgarc...@gmail.com wrote:
Adding to Igor's comment, remember that nested form is not allow in HTML
spec per se, so what wicket is doing a trick where the root form is submit
but only elements of nested form (which get transform in DIV tag) are
processed
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Igor Vaynberg-2 [via Apache Wicket]
ml-node+3228304-1818027643-65...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b3228304-1818027643-65...@n4.nabble.com
ml-node%2b3228304-1818027643-65...@n4.nabble.comml-node%252b3228304-1818027643-65...@n4.nabble.com
wrote:
the bigger form needs to be processed because what is submitted is the
root form's formtag. however, validation, etc, will probably be
delegated only to the inner form.
-igor
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Daniel Bartl [hidden email]
http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3228304i=0
wrote:
Have a small question regarding using AjaxFormSubmitBehavoir with
nested
forms.
Would like to use it to submit a smaller nested form within a bigger
parent
form.
Even though I passed a nested form as a *form that will be submitted*
while calling the following constructor of AjaxFormSubmitBehavoir :
/**
* Construct.
*
* @param form
* * form that will be submitted*
* @param event
*javascript event this behavior is attached to, like
onclick
*/
public AjaxFormSubmitBehavior(Form? form, String
event) - passing nested form here
{
super(event);
__form = form;
if (form != null)
{
form.setOutputMarkupId(true);
}
}
I noticed that the AjaxFormSubmitBehavior#onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget
target)
executes the following line first:
getForm().getRootForm().onFormSubmitted();
Why does it still delegate to the root form?
Shouldn't the line be getForm().onFormSubmitted(); so that the nested
form
and possibly its children get processed only.
Many thanks!
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3228304i=1
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3228304i=2
--
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-regarding-AjaxFormSubmitBehavior-tp3227451p3228304.html
To start a new topic under Apache Wicket, email
ml-node+1842946-398011874-65...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b1842946-398011874-65...@n4.nabble.com
ml-node%2b1842946-398011874-65...@n4.nabble.comml-node%252b1842946-398011874-65...@n4.nabble.com
To
Re: modal window IE8 parent page scrolbar
Do anybody know solutions for this issue? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/modal-window-IE8-parent-page-scrolbar-tp3056439p3229703.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Wicket with fest assert
Hi happy Wicket users! For last couple of months I was using Wicket in 2 projects I am working on. The only thing that drives me crazy from time to time is support for testing. It is obviously better then in any Java web framework I every used, but I think it could be simpler to use and more readable. I have developed small utility that uses fest-assert ( http://code.google.com/p/fest/), a fluent assertions framework. It replaces WicketTester.assert* with fluent assertions. Basically with this library your assertions look like this: WicketTester tester = new WicketTester(); Panel panel = tester.startPanel(MenuPanel.class); assertComponent(panel).bookmarkablePageLink(at(home-link)).linksTo( IndexPage.class); assertComponent(panel).bookmarkablePageLink(at(artists-link)).linksTo( ArtistPage.class); assertComponent(panel).bookmarkablePageLink(at(albums-link)).linksTo( AlbumPage.class); or this: assertComponent(panel) .component(at(ID_ALBUM_DETAILS_URL, ID_ALBUM_TITLE)) .modelValue().isEqualTo(albumTitle); assertComponent(panel) .component(at(ID_ARTIST_DETAILS_URL, ID_ARTIST_NAME)) .modelValue().isEqualTo(artistName); This library was derived from code I am working on for presentation. It is really in early stage as this is side development, but I would like to get your views on this and if you think it will bring value to Wicket community. You can find it at https://bitbucket.org/kcrimson/fest-assert-wicket/ and more examples how you can use it at https://bitbucket.org/kcrimson/nosql-web. I will be more than happy to get your requests for enhancements and hopefully release this project in near future. Regards, Jarek
Re: About AbstractLink
WebApplication.get().getMarkupSettings().setDefaultBeforeDisabledLink(div); WebApplication.get().getMarkupSettings().setDefaultAfterDisabledLink(/div); On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Heitor Machado heito...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I noticed some days ago that the AbstractLink component when disabled, render itself as a span. Is there some especific motivation for that ? I´m asking because I think that a component/element does not have to change itself in that way, its suposed to be a responsability of its holder, and any way, why a span ? All applications should render a span instead of an anchor when that anchor was disabled? Could I perhaps change it´s css class and strip its actions ? Or nor even render it ? Of course we can override the disableLink of AbstractLink (this is the method that does the magic), but it becomes a problem because now we *have* to do it. One of the characteristics that I like most in wicket is freedom, I can use whatever css and javascript the way I want, I can model my application in any way I like it, and this is a point of advantage of wicket over other frameworks, wicket is not pervasive, and the way that method is wrote is very pervasive. Cheers Heitor -- Jeremy Thomerson http://wickettraining.com *Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*
Re: Wicket with fest assert
Nice! I'll check your work soon. Recently a friend of mine also asked me why we don't include the useful things from EnhancedWicketTester( http://www.paulszulc.com/tag/wickettester/ ) There is a room for improvement in that area. 2011/1/21 Jarosław Pałka jpa...@gmail.com Hi happy Wicket users! For last couple of months I was using Wicket in 2 projects I am working on. The only thing that drives me crazy from time to time is support for testing. It is obviously better then in any Java web framework I every used, but I think it could be simpler to use and more readable. I have developed small utility that uses fest-assert ( http://code.google.com/p/fest/), a fluent assertions framework. It replaces WicketTester.assert* with fluent assertions. Basically with this library your assertions look like this: WicketTester tester = new WicketTester(); Panel panel = tester.startPanel(MenuPanel.class); assertComponent(panel).bookmarkablePageLink(at(home-link)).linksTo( IndexPage.class); assertComponent(panel).bookmarkablePageLink(at(artists-link)).linksTo( ArtistPage.class); assertComponent(panel).bookmarkablePageLink(at(albums-link)).linksTo( AlbumPage.class); or this: assertComponent(panel) .component(at(ID_ALBUM_DETAILS_URL, ID_ALBUM_TITLE)) .modelValue().isEqualTo(albumTitle); assertComponent(panel) .component(at(ID_ARTIST_DETAILS_URL, ID_ARTIST_NAME)) .modelValue().isEqualTo(artistName); This library was derived from code I am working on for presentation. It is really in early stage as this is side development, but I would like to get your views on this and if you think it will bring value to Wicket community. You can find it at https://bitbucket.org/kcrimson/fest-assert-wicket/ and more examples how you can use it at https://bitbucket.org/kcrimson/nosql-web. I will be more than happy to get your requests for enhancements and hopefully release this project in near future. Regards, Jarek
Re: DatePickerBehavior lost when toggling visibility
Sorry, I didn't get that wiquery also used jQuery. After changing to wiquery I at least got my quickstart-app running On 2011-01-21 13:34, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote: A said: this works fine on my applications using latest versions of wiquery DatePicker [(see 1]) + AJAX replacements. 1-http://www.google.com/codesearch/p?hl=en#pdLMIUTpzpE/trunk/src/main/java/org/odlabs/wiquery/ui/datepicker/DatePicker.java Ernesto On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Swanthe Lindgren swanthe.lindg...@megasol.se wrote: I have just changed to jQuery DatePickerBehavior from wicket extensions YUI DatePicker, which of course worked just fine in this scenario, but since I want some of the customizations available in jQuery we made a switch. On 2011-01-21 12:49, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote: Are you using wiquery? If so, can you show me your code or send me a simplified Panel showing this behavior? I use wiquery datepickers on my applications in combination with via AJAX replacements and do not have this issue. Ernesto On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Swanthe Lindgren swanthe.lindg...@megasol.sewrote: A drop down box fires an AJAX request and the text field with the date picker has an overridden isVisible() method. On 2011-01-21 12:35, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote: How do you toggle visibility? Replacing panels via AJAX or client side JavaScript? The AJAX way will work for sure. I think via JavaScript you will have to manually recreate it when making it visible Ernesto On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Swanthe Lindgren swanthe.lindg...@megasol.se wrote: Hello I have a text field with jQuery DatePickerBehavior. When the page is loaded and the field is initially visible, the behavior works just fine. But when toggling the visibility from hidden to visible, the client function is gone. The little date packer icon is gone and so is the click event on the input field. What do I have to do? //Swanthe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: About AbstractLink
Very nice, tanks Jeremy, but the main question is not about SPANs X DIVs, or whatever. And even with this nice snipet, should all disabled links in my app appear with DIVs ? Without exceptions ? tanks Heitor
Re: About AbstractLink
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Heitor Machado heito...@gmail.com wrote: Very nice, tanks Jeremy, but the main question is not about SPANs X DIVs, or whatever. And even with this nice snipet, should all disabled links in my app appear with DIVs ? Without exceptions ? A link doesn't have corresponding markup (as a separate markup file). So, it has to be set programmatically. So, you can set a default (like I showed before), and individual links can have AbstractLink#setAfterDisabledLink called. (and setBefore) -- Jeremy Thomerson http://wickettraining.com *Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*
Re: Question regarding AjaxFormSubmitBehavior
you are welcome to submit a jira issue with a unit test/quickstart
that demonstrates the problem.
-igor
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Daniel Bartl d.ba...@comsysto.com wrote:
Many thanks for your feedback!
I am well aware of the fact that HTML spec actually does not allow nested
forms and that wicket is already doing great job while transforming those
nested forms into divs.
I also expected that the bigger form gets submitted as well but only the
nested one processed and the rest ignored, but that's not exactly what's
happening in our case.
The reason for this is that AjaxFormSubmitBehavior always delegates to the
#onFormSubmitted() of the root form
AjaxFormSubmitBehavior, line 135:
getForm().getRootForm().onFormSubmitted();
which then looks up if there is any enabled, visible
IFormSubmittingComponent in the hierarchy that has been triggered. Only in
case that one such IFormSubmittingComponent gets identified, it sets
*formToProcess* to the form of the identified submittingComponent and then
finally invokes
Form, line 920: formToProcess.process(submittingComponent);
The problem with our crazy liitle nested form ;) is that it does not have
any IFormSubmittingComponent but rather a TextField with
AjaxFormSubmitBehavior attached to its onchange event that should then
submit the nested form accordingly. This leads to formToProcess being left
assigned to the parentForm that then gets processed at the end:
- from Form#onFormSubmitted():
// this is the root form
Form? formToProcess = this;
// find out whether it was a nested form that was
submitted
if (submittingComponent != null)
{
formToProcess = submittingComponent.getForm();
}
// process the form for this request
formToProcess.process(submittingComponent);
We have in the meantime subclassed AjaxFormSubmitBehavior with our own
implementation of AjaxFormSubmitBehavior#onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget target)
method the only difference being the line 135 that was changed from
getForm().getRootForm().onFormSubmitted();
to
getForm().onFormSubmitted();
and did not experience any problems with it, at least so far ;)
Daniel
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:25 AM, jcgarciam jcgarc...@gmail.com wrote:
Adding to Igor's comment, remember that nested form is not allow in HTML
spec per se, so what wicket is doing a trick where the root form is submit
but only elements of nested form (which get transform in DIV tag) are
processed
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Igor Vaynberg-2 [via Apache Wicket]
ml-node+3228304-1818027643-65...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b3228304-1818027643-65...@n4.nabble.com
ml-node%2b3228304-1818027643-65...@n4.nabble.comml-node%252b3228304-1818027643-65...@n4.nabble.com
wrote:
the bigger form needs to be processed because what is submitted is the
root form's formtag. however, validation, etc, will probably be
delegated only to the inner form.
-igor
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Daniel Bartl [hidden email]
http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3228304i=0
wrote:
Have a small question regarding using AjaxFormSubmitBehavoir with
nested
forms.
Would like to use it to submit a smaller nested form within a bigger
parent
form.
Even though I passed a nested form as a *form that will be submitted*
while calling the following constructor of AjaxFormSubmitBehavoir :
/**
* Construct.
*
* @param form
* * form that will be submitted*
* @param event
* javascript event this behavior is attached to, like
onclick
*/
public AjaxFormSubmitBehavior(Form? form, String
event) - passing nested form here
{
super(event);
__form = form;
if (form != null)
{
form.setOutputMarkupId(true);
}
}
I noticed that the AjaxFormSubmitBehavior#onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget
target)
executes the following line first:
getForm().getRootForm().onFormSubmitted();
Why does it still delegate to the root form?
Shouldn't the line be getForm().onFormSubmitted(); so that the nested
form
and possibly its children get processed only.
Many thanks!
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3228304i=1
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3228304i=2
--
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-regarding-AjaxFormSubmitBehavior-tp3227451p3228304.html
To start a new topic under Apache Wicket,
Re: About AbstractLink
afaik anchors in html do not support a disabled attribute. so the only way to make it really unclickable is to not render it as an anchor. of course you can change that by tweaking Jeremy's example WebApplication.get().getMarkupSettings().setDefaultBeforeDisabledLink(a); WebApplication.get().getMarkupSettings().setDefaultAfterDisabledLink(/a); -igor On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Heitor Machado heito...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I noticed some days ago that the AbstractLink component when disabled, render itself as a span. Is there some especific motivation for that ? I´m asking because I think that a component/element does not have to change itself in that way, its suposed to be a responsability of its holder, and any way, why a span ? All applications should render a span instead of an anchor when that anchor was disabled? Could I perhaps change it´s css class and strip its actions ? Or nor even render it ? Of course we can override the disableLink of AbstractLink (this is the method that does the magic), but it becomes a problem because now we *have* to do it. One of the characteristics that I like most in wicket is freedom, I can use whatever css and javascript the way I want, I can model my application in any way I like it, and this is a point of advantage of wicket over other frameworks, wicket is not pervasive, and the way that method is wrote is very pervasive. Cheers Heitor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: About AbstractLink
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote: afaik anchors in html do not support a disabled attribute. so the only way to make it really unclickable is to not render it as an anchor. of course you can change that by tweaking Jeremy's example WebApplication.get().getMarkupSettings().setDefaultBeforeDisabledLink(a); WebApplication.get().getMarkupSettings().setDefaultAfterDisabledLink(/a); Am I wrong or these methods replace the default em with div/a and the span Heitor talks about is still inside them ? -igor On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Heitor Machado heito...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I noticed some days ago that the AbstractLink component when disabled, render itself as a span. Is there some especific motivation for that ? I´m asking because I think that a component/element does not have to change itself in that way, its suposed to be a responsability of its holder, and any way, why a span ? All applications should render a span instead of an anchor when that anchor was disabled? Could I perhaps change it´s css class and strip its actions ? Or nor even render it ? Of course we can override the disableLink of AbstractLink (this is the method that does the magic), but it becomes a problem because now we *have* to do it. One of the characteristics that I like most in wicket is freedom, I can use whatever css and javascript the way I want, I can model my application in any way I like it, and this is a point of advantage of wicket over other frameworks, wicket is not pervasive, and the way that method is wrote is very pervasive. Cheers Heitor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: About AbstractLink
no, they will replace the span. and iirc em was changed to span a while back as the default -igor On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote: afaik anchors in html do not support a disabled attribute. so the only way to make it really unclickable is to not render it as an anchor. of course you can change that by tweaking Jeremy's example WebApplication.get().getMarkupSettings().setDefaultBeforeDisabledLink(a); WebApplication.get().getMarkupSettings().setDefaultAfterDisabledLink(/a); Am I wrong or these methods replace the default em with div/a and the span Heitor talks about is still inside them ? -igor On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Heitor Machado heito...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I noticed some days ago that the AbstractLink component when disabled, render itself as a span. Is there some especific motivation for that ? I´m asking because I think that a component/element does not have to change itself in that way, its suposed to be a responsability of its holder, and any way, why a span ? All applications should render a span instead of an anchor when that anchor was disabled? Could I perhaps change it´s css class and strip its actions ? Or nor even render it ? Of course we can override the disableLink of AbstractLink (this is the method that does the magic), but it becomes a problem because now we *have* to do it. One of the characteristics that I like most in wicket is freedom, I can use whatever css and javascript the way I want, I can model my application in any way I like it, and this is a point of advantage of wicket over other frameworks, wicket is not pervasive, and the way that method is wrote is very pervasive. Cheers Heitor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket with fest assert
Of course! https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/type-safe-testing-in-wicket.html It must be built in :) There is a room for improvement in that area. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: About AbstractLink
Sent from my BlackBerry® powered by Sinyal Kuat INDOSAT -Original Message- From: Heitor Machado heito...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:08:25 To: users@wicket.apache.org Reply-To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: About AbstractLink Very nice, tanks Jeremy, but the main question is not about SPANs X DIVs, or whatever. And even with this nice snipet, should all disabled links in my app appear with DIVs ? Without exceptions ? tanks Heitor
