Is there anyway to get a bookmarkable url from calling setResponsePage?
Hi, I love using wicket (1.4) its by far the best web framework for java I have used. However the one thing that really is hard work is the url handling for me. Our users all the time want to copy and paste the url of a given page in to an email or use in a comment to link to something in the app. We've tried making as many links bookmarkable as possible but this only works until they click on another link/action and then the url is lost. I have 2 questions: 1 - is there a way to have a bookmarkable url from using a setResponsePage? Basically we have a tree view, and when one of the nodes is click via ajax I want to redirect them to a given page. However I want that page's URL in the browser to be bookmarkable so they can copy and paste the url. Is there any way of doing this? I've mounted the page using MixedParamUrlCodingStrategy but this doesn't work. 2- is there a better strategy to having all url's bookmarkable (providing the page supports pageparamters)? Are there any changes in wicket 1.5 to make life more easy? thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Is there anyway to get a bookmarkable url from calling setResponsePage?
setResponsePage(Page.class, new PageParameters()); On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I love using wicket (1.4) its by far the best web framework for java I have used. However the one thing that really is hard work is the url handling for me. Our users all the time want to copy and paste the url of a given page in to an email or use in a comment to link to something in the app. We've tried making as many links bookmarkable as possible but this only works until they click on another link/action and then the url is lost. I have 2 questions: 1 - is there a way to have a bookmarkable url from using a setResponsePage? Basically we have a tree view, and when one of the nodes is click via ajax I want to redirect them to a given page. However I want that page's URL in the browser to be bookmarkable so they can copy and paste the url. Is there any way of doing this? I've mounted the page using MixedParamUrlCodingStrategy but this doesn't work. 2- is there a better strategy to having all url's bookmarkable (providing the page supports pageparamters)? Are there any changes in wicket 1.5 to make life more easy? thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Is there anyway to get a bookmarkable url from calling setResponsePage?
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote: 2- is there a better strategy to having all url's bookmarkable (providing the page supports pageparamters)? Are there any changes in wicket 1.5 to make life more easy? Default constructor or constructor with pageparameters: you can take a look at wicket-annot from wicketstuff core Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Is there anyway to get a bookmarkable url from calling setResponsePage?
thanks Martijn, I was looking at someone's else code and it was : params.add(PROJECTID, info.getId().toString()); setResponsePage(new =ProjectPage(params)); rather than: params.add(PROJECTID, info.getId().toString()); setResponsePage(ProjectPage.class, params); Need coffee. Sorry about that. Thanks for the pointer to wicket-annot - looks interesting Another question if you don't mind? Quite often we have a bookmarkable page with a form or link on it. This form/link will update the model and redisplay the current page. When this happens we loose the bookmarkable url. At the end of the onSubmit, or onClick we don't call setResponsePage. Should be call setResponsePage to get the bookmarkable url? On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote: 2- is there a better strategy to having all url's bookmarkable (providing the page supports pageparamters)? Are there any changes in wicket 1.5 to make life more easy? Default constructor or constructor with pageparameters: you can take a look at wicket-annot from wicketstuff core Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Is there anyway to get a bookmarkable url from calling setResponsePage?
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote: Another question if you don't mind? Quite often we have a bookmarkable page with a form or link on it. This form/link will update the model and redisplay the current page. When this happens we loose the bookmarkable url. At the end of the onSubmit, or onClick we don't call setResponsePage. Should be call setResponsePage to get the bookmarkable url? Yes. Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
StatelessForm growing url when there is errorvalidation
Hello,
I have a strange problem with statelessForm :
I would like a stateless application with 2 statelessForm and with somes
required validators on form :
public class HomePage extends WebPage {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
super(parameters);
setVersioned(false);
Form form1 = new StatelessForm(form1) {
@Override
protected void onSubmit() {
setResponsePage(ResultPage.class);
}
};
form1.add(new TextFieldString(input1).setRequired(true));
add(form1);
Form form2 = new StatelessForm(form2) {
@Override
protected void onSubmit() {
setResponsePage(ResultPage.class);
}
};
form2.add(new TextFieldString(input1).setRequired(true));
add(form2);
}
}
The problem is when I submit alternatively each form (I don't fill the
Textfield required intentionally), the url growing like this :
1st submit :
http://localhost:8080/Wicket-Test/HomePage.html?wicket:interface=:0:form2::IFormSubmitListener::
2nd submit :
http://localhost:8080/Wicket-Test/HomePage.html?form22_hf_0=wicket:interface=:0:form1::IFormSubmitListener::
3th submit :
http://localhost:8080/Wicket-Test/HomePage.html?form22_hf_0=form12_hf_0=wicket:interface=:0:form2::IFormSubmitListener::
4th submit :
http://localhost:8080/Wicket-Test/HomePage.html?form22_hf_0=form22_hf_0=form12_hf_0=wicket:interface=:0:form1::IFormSubmitListener::
...
Is there a solution to solve this problem ?
Best regards
I use wicket 1.4.15
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/file/n3296950/Wicket-test.rar
Wicket-test.rar
-
Duto
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/StatelessForm-growing-url-when-there-is-errorvalidation-tp3296950p3296950.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: cleanup form values and feedback messages
Hi,
hrbaer wrote:
...
try {
pm.makePersistent( ent );
modal.show( target );
target.add(feedback); === I guess this was missing
}
-
You need to add the feedback to the target on success as well
Cheers
Hans
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/cleanup-form-values-and-feedback-messages-tp3275588p3297033.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Question about Unit Testing with custom Session
Thank you for reply,
yes! And I get then another exception :)
Cannot resolve ServletContextResource without ServletContext
Does andybody know how can I get/set the servletContext?
Dmitriy
On 8 February 2011 18:01, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
did you call context.refresh() ? like the error message said?
-igor
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
my complete setUp looks like this:
@Before
public void setUp() {
MworldWicketApplication wicketWebApp = new
MworldWicketApplication()
{
ApplicationContext ctx = new XmlWebApplicationContext();
@Override
public void init() {
addComponentInstantiationListener(new
SpringComponentInjector(this, ctx, true));
}
};
tester = new WicketTester(wicketWebApp);
pageParams = new HashMapString, String();
}
So the wickettester instance is created after the Appllication class is
overriden. Even if I extract the wickettester creation from setup and
will
make it in each test (it is actually the same) I have the same problem.
After debuggin the tests I have seen that my appcontext instance was
created
and the .xml file was correctly recognized :( But I still get the
exception...
On 8 February 2011 07:37, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
make sure your setup() code runs before wicket tester instance is
created.
-igor
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
When 1.4.16 going to be released
Hi folks, anyone know when 1.4.16 will get released? Cheers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AjaxCheckBox not Disabling Checkbox on call to onUpdate
I have found a solution to my first problem which was Disabling my checkbox.
I did it by changing my listView to a RefreshingView and then using
AjaxEventBehavior on my checkbox like so:
final RefreshingView rv = new RefreshingView(mychanges) {
@Override
protected Iterator getItemModels() {
return new ModelIteratorAdapter(userSearchResults.iterator()) {
@Override
protected IModel model(Object arg0) {
return new CompoundPropertyModel ((UserSearchResult)
arg0);
}
};
}
@Override
protected void populateItem(Item arg1) {
final CheckBox ajaxCheck = new CheckBox(verifyflag, new
PropertyModel(SearchResultPage.this, checkFalse));
ajaxCheck.add(new AjaxEventBehavior(onclick) {
@Override
protected void onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget arg0) {
ajaxCheck.setEnabled(false);
arg0.addComponent(ajaxCheck);
}
});
}
My question is that I need to have the ability that once my checkbox is
selected to update 2 labels that are part of the Item I am populating:
arg1.add(new Label(verifyby, model.getVRFD_BY_USR_ID()));
arg1.add(new Label(verifydt, DateUtil.formatDate(model.getVRFD_DT(;
How could this be accomplished?
regards,
Sheadley
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AjaxCheckBox-not-Disabling-Checkbox-on-call-to-onUpdate-tp3264816p3297061.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Question about Unit Testing with custom Session
Hi,
Try this in your application's #init() method (before calling #refresh() on
ctx)
ctx.setServletContext(getServletContext());
Attila
2011/2/9 Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com
Thank you for reply,
yes! And I get then another exception :)
Cannot resolve ServletContextResource without ServletContext
Does andybody know how can I get/set the servletContext?
Dmitriy
On 8 February 2011 18:01, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
did you call context.refresh() ? like the error message said?
-igor
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
my complete setUp looks like this:
@Before
public void setUp() {
MworldWicketApplication wicketWebApp = new
MworldWicketApplication()
{
ApplicationContext ctx = new XmlWebApplicationContext();
@Override
public void init() {
addComponentInstantiationListener(new
SpringComponentInjector(this, ctx, true));
}
};
tester = new WicketTester(wicketWebApp);
pageParams = new HashMapString, String();
}
So the wickettester instance is created after the Appllication class is
overriden. Even if I extract the wickettester creation from setup and
will
make it in each test (it is actually the same) I have the same problem.
After debuggin the tests I have seen that my appcontext instance was
created
and the .xml file was correctly recognized :( But I still get the
exception...
On 8 February 2011 07:37, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
make sure your setup() code runs before wicket tester instance is
created.
-igor
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
I would rather write programs to write programs than write programs.
Re: Question about Unit Testing with custom Session
Hi,
thank you! Now I know how to get the ServletContext :) But it didn't solve
the main problem. This time I got following exception:
IOException parsing XML document from ServletContext resource
[/WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml]; nested exception is
java.io.FileNotFoundException: Could not open ServletContext resource
[/WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml]
This is the right path. The xml file is there. It also schouldn't be a
problem with file system permissions :(
On 9 February 2011 12:57, Attila Király kiralyattila...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Try this in your application's #init() method (before calling #refresh() on
ctx)
ctx.setServletContext(getServletContext());
Attila
2011/2/9 Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com
Thank you for reply,
yes! And I get then another exception :)
Cannot resolve ServletContextResource without ServletContext
Does andybody know how can I get/set the servletContext?
Dmitriy
On 8 February 2011 18:01, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
did you call context.refresh() ? like the error message said?
-igor
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
my complete setUp looks like this:
@Before
public void setUp() {
MworldWicketApplication wicketWebApp = new
MworldWicketApplication()
{
ApplicationContext ctx = new XmlWebApplicationContext();
@Override
public void init() {
addComponentInstantiationListener(new
SpringComponentInjector(this, ctx, true));
}
};
tester = new WicketTester(wicketWebApp);
pageParams = new HashMapString, String();
}
So the wickettester instance is created after the Appllication class
is
overriden. Even if I extract the wickettester creation from setup and
will
make it in each test (it is actually the same) I have the same
problem.
After debuggin the tests I have seen that my appcontext instance was
created
and the .xml file was correctly recognized :( But I still get the
exception...
On 8 February 2011 07:37, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
make sure your setup() code runs before wicket tester instance is
created.
-igor
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
I would rather write programs to write programs than write programs.
Re: Question about Unit Testing with custom Session
The problem is that your test is not actualy running in a servlet container,
only in a wicket mocked servlet context. To access webapp resources in the
test you have to specify in the second parameter of WicketTester constructor
where your web app's root is. Like this (in a maven project):
WicketTester tester = new WicketTester(new MockApplication(),
target/my-webapp-name);
Assert.assertNotNull(tester.getServletContext().getResource(WEB-INF/web.xml));
Attila
2011/2/9 Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com
Hi,
thank you! Now I know how to get the ServletContext :) But it didn't solve
the main problem. This time I got following exception:
IOException parsing XML document from ServletContext resource
[/WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml]; nested exception is
java.io.FileNotFoundException: Could not open ServletContext resource
[/WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml]
This is the right path. The xml file is there. It also schouldn't be a
problem with file system permissions :(
On 9 February 2011 12:57, Attila Király kiralyattila...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Try this in your application's #init() method (before calling #refresh()
on
ctx)
ctx.setServletContext(getServletContext());
Attila
2011/2/9 Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com
Thank you for reply,
yes! And I get then another exception :)
Cannot resolve ServletContextResource without ServletContext
Does andybody know how can I get/set the servletContext?
Dmitriy
On 8 February 2011 18:01, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
did you call context.refresh() ? like the error message said?
-igor
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
my complete setUp looks like this:
@Before
public void setUp() {
MworldWicketApplication wicketWebApp = new
MworldWicketApplication()
{
ApplicationContext ctx = new XmlWebApplicationContext();
@Override
public void init() {
addComponentInstantiationListener(new
SpringComponentInjector(this, ctx, true));
}
};
tester = new WicketTester(wicketWebApp);
pageParams = new HashMapString, String();
}
So the wickettester instance is created after the Appllication
class
is
overriden. Even if I extract the wickettester creation from setup
and
will
make it in each test (it is actually the same) I have the same
problem.
After debuggin the tests I have seen that my appcontext instance
was
created
and the .xml file was correctly recognized :( But I still get the
exception...
On 8 February 2011 07:37, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
make sure your setup() code runs before wicket tester instance is
created.
-igor
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
I would rather write programs to write programs than write programs.
Re: Question about Unit Testing with custom Session
Thank you it finally works! :)
But what I still don't understand: the problem appeared after I inserted
following in the custom session constructor:
InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this);
And why it worked with only one WicketTester constructor parameter (new
MyApplication)? And after Spring integration there schould be 2 parameters?
Thank you!
P.S. My assertion for ServletContext looks like this:
Assert.assertNotNull(tester.getServletSession().getServletContext().getContext(WEB-INF/web.xml));
On 9 February 2011 14:27, Attila Király kiralyattila...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that your test is not actualy running in a servlet
container,
only in a wicket mocked servlet context. To access webapp resources in the
test you have to specify in the second parameter of WicketTester
constructor
where your web app's root is. Like this (in a maven project):
WicketTester tester = new WicketTester(new MockApplication(),
target/my-webapp-name);
Assert.assertNotNull(tester.getServletContext().getResource(WEB-INF/web.xml));
Attila
2011/2/9 Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com
Hi,
thank you! Now I know how to get the ServletContext :) But it didn't
solve
the main problem. This time I got following exception:
IOException parsing XML document from ServletContext resource
[/WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml]; nested exception is
java.io.FileNotFoundException: Could not open ServletContext resource
[/WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml]
This is the right path. The xml file is there. It also schouldn't be a
problem with file system permissions :(
On 9 February 2011 12:57, Attila Király kiralyattila...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Try this in your application's #init() method (before calling
#refresh()
on
ctx)
ctx.setServletContext(getServletContext());
Attila
2011/2/9 Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com
Thank you for reply,
yes! And I get then another exception :)
Cannot resolve ServletContextResource without ServletContext
Does andybody know how can I get/set the servletContext?
Dmitriy
On 8 February 2011 18:01, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
did you call context.refresh() ? like the error message said?
-igor
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
my complete setUp looks like this:
@Before
public void setUp() {
MworldWicketApplication wicketWebApp = new
MworldWicketApplication()
{
ApplicationContext ctx = new
XmlWebApplicationContext();
@Override
public void init() {
addComponentInstantiationListener(new
SpringComponentInjector(this, ctx, true));
}
};
tester = new WicketTester(wicketWebApp);
pageParams = new HashMapString, String();
}
So the wickettester instance is created after the Appllication
class
is
overriden. Even if I extract the wickettester creation from setup
and
will
make it in each test (it is actually the same) I have the same
problem.
After debuggin the tests I have seen that my appcontext instance
was
created
and the .xml file was correctly recognized :( But I still get the
exception...
On 8 February 2011 07:37, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
make sure your setup() code runs before wicket tester instance
is
created.
-igor
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
I would rather write programs to write programs than write programs.
Wicket Philosophy/Best Practice
I tell people that I think you should let your Model and Model backing
object control the look and feel/display/content of your components.
Even visibility should be delegated to the model or model object and not
set by the component. Am I wrong here?
I use this approach (only work with the Model/ModelObject) as opposed to
monkeying with the wicket internal(seemingly) methods like
onComponentTag or adding javascript to control the look feel or tags?
E.g.
MyComponent {
isVisible() {
getModelObject().isVisible();
}
isEnabled() {
getModelObject().isEnabled();
}
}
Berlin Brown
RE: Wicket Philosophy/Best Practice
I tell people that I think you should let your Model and Model backing object control the look and feel/display/content of your components. Even visibility should be delegated to the model or model object and not set by the component. Am I wrong here? Yes. :) The model should NOT care about the view, or even know one is there; a controller is supposed to manipulate the model, any view (if any) should just get the value from there and do any necessary formatting (e.g. using a converter to/from textual representation). For instance, why should a Model need to know the locale of a web user to produce a correct representation? Separation of concerns and all that. - Tor Iver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Question about Unit Testing with custom Session
Hi,
2011/2/9 Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com
Thank you it finally works! :)
Great!
But what I still don't understand: the problem appeared after I inserted
following in the custom session constructor:
InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this);
And why it worked with only one WicketTester constructor parameter (new
MyApplication)? And after Spring integration there schould be 2 parameters?
Only spring's XmlWebApplicationContext needed the real web app resources
(the WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml file) wicket itself did not. So without
injection nothing was using it.
P.S. My assertion for ServletContext looks like this:
Assert.assertNotNull(tester.getServletSession().getServletContext().getContext(WEB-INF/web.xml));
You are right. tester.getServletContext() is only available in 1.5, not in
1.4.
Attila
On 9 February 2011 14:27, Attila Király kiralyattila...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that your test is not actualy running in a servlet
container,
only in a wicket mocked servlet context. To access webapp resources in
the
test you have to specify in the second parameter of WicketTester
constructor
where your web app's root is. Like this (in a maven project):
WicketTester tester = new WicketTester(new MockApplication(),
target/my-webapp-name);
Assert.assertNotNull(tester.getServletContext().getResource(WEB-INF/web.xml));
Attila
2011/2/9 Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com
Hi,
thank you! Now I know how to get the ServletContext :) But it didn't
solve
the main problem. This time I got following exception:
IOException parsing XML document from ServletContext resource
[/WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml]; nested exception is
java.io.FileNotFoundException: Could not open ServletContext resource
[/WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml]
This is the right path. The xml file is there. It also schouldn't be a
problem with file system permissions :(
On 9 February 2011 12:57, Attila Király kiralyattila...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Try this in your application's #init() method (before calling
#refresh()
on
ctx)
ctx.setServletContext(getServletContext());
Attila
2011/2/9 Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com
Thank you for reply,
yes! And I get then another exception :)
Cannot resolve ServletContextResource without ServletContext
Does andybody know how can I get/set the servletContext?
Dmitriy
On 8 February 2011 18:01, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
did you call context.refresh() ? like the error message said?
-igor
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
my complete setUp looks like this:
@Before
public void setUp() {
MworldWicketApplication wicketWebApp = new
MworldWicketApplication()
{
ApplicationContext ctx = new
XmlWebApplicationContext();
@Override
public void init() {
addComponentInstantiationListener(new
SpringComponentInjector(this, ctx, true));
}
};
tester = new WicketTester(wicketWebApp);
pageParams = new HashMapString, String();
}
So the wickettester instance is created after the Appllication
class
is
overriden. Even if I extract the wickettester creation from
setup
and
will
make it in each test (it is actually the same) I have the same
problem.
After debuggin the tests I have seen that my appcontext
instance
was
created
and the .xml file was correctly recognized :( But I still get
the
exception...
On 8 February 2011 07:37, Igor Vaynberg
igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
make sure your setup() code runs before wicket tester instance
is
created.
-igor
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
I would rather write programs to write programs than write
programs.
Ajax onChange but also submit all data on a form
Can you submit all of the data on a form based on an onchange event?
Is adding javascript the only way to submit the data?
Pseudo Code:
Panel {
Form form = new Form(new CompoundPropertyModel());
add(form);
form.add(new TextField(val);
form.add(childList = new DropDownChoice());
childList.add( new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange) {
protected void onUpdate( final AjaxRequestTarget target ) {
/// Tried clearing the messages here, does not work.
Line12: form.getObjectModel().setVal(Hello);
target.addComponent(panel);
target.addComponent(form);
}
});
form.add(new MyValidator());
form.add(new AjaxSubmitLink(form)) {
onSubmit() {
save();
moveToNextScreen();
}
}
}
Berlin Brown
ajax versioning
Hi! In case I have a bookmarkable page with some AJAX on it (form+table) and the user can navigate away and back to this page (using the back button). How can I make sure that in case of the back button, the user will see the state of the page after the AJAX modifications? Best regards, Istvan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Ajax onChange but also submit all data on a form
Use AjaxFormSubmitBehavior instead of AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehaviour.
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehaviour is just for updating a single field
in a form.
AjaxButton uses AjaxFormSubmitBehaviour internally so look at that for
an example.
Mike
Can you submit all of the data on a form based on an onchange event?
Is adding javascript the only way to submit the data?
Pseudo Code:
Panel {
Form form = new Form(new CompoundPropertyModel());
add(form);
form.add(new TextField(val);
form.add(childList = new DropDownChoice());
childList.add( new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange) {
protected void onUpdate( final AjaxRequestTarget target ) {
/// Tried clearing the messages here, does not work.
Line12: form.getObjectModel().setVal(Hello);
target.addComponent(panel);
target.addComponent(form);
}
});
form.add(new MyValidator());
form.add(new AjaxSubmitLink(form)) {
onSubmit() {
save();
moveToNextScreen();
}
}
}
Berlin Brown
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: When 1.4.16 going to be released
is there anything particularly important in it that you need? -igor On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Przemek Kubicki prze...@consol.pl wrote: Hi folks, anyone know when 1.4.16 will get released? Cheers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ajax versioning
mount it with hybrid url coding strategy -igor On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Istvan De surf-ki...@freemail.hu wrote: Hi! In case I have a bookmarkable page with some AJAX on it (form+table) and the user can navigate away and back to this page (using the back button). How can I make sure that in case of the back button, the user will see the state of the page after the AJAX modifications? Best regards, Istvan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: StatelessForm growing url when there is errorvalidation
hrm. i thought this was fixed a long time ago. please file a bug with
a quickstart.
-igor
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Olivier Dutrieux
olivier.dutri...@pasteur.fr wrote:
Hello,
I have a strange problem with statelessForm :
I would like a stateless application with 2 statelessForm and with somes
required validators on form :
public class HomePage extends WebPage {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
super(parameters);
setVersioned(false);
Form form1 = new StatelessForm(form1) {
@Override
protected void onSubmit() {
setResponsePage(ResultPage.class);
}
};
form1.add(new TextFieldString(input1).setRequired(true));
add(form1);
Form form2 = new StatelessForm(form2) {
@Override
protected void onSubmit() {
setResponsePage(ResultPage.class);
}
};
form2.add(new TextFieldString(input1).setRequired(true));
add(form2);
}
}
The problem is when I submit alternatively each form (I don't fill the
Textfield required intentionally), the url growing like this :
1st submit :
http://localhost:8080/Wicket-Test/HomePage.html?wicket:interface=:0:form2::IFormSubmitListener::
2nd submit :
http://localhost:8080/Wicket-Test/HomePage.html?form22_hf_0=wicket:interface=:0:form1::IFormSubmitListener::
3th submit :
http://localhost:8080/Wicket-Test/HomePage.html?form22_hf_0=form12_hf_0=wicket:interface=:0:form2::IFormSubmitListener::
4th submit :
http://localhost:8080/Wicket-Test/HomePage.html?form22_hf_0=form22_hf_0=form12_hf_0=wicket:interface=:0:form1::IFormSubmitListener::
...
Is there a solution to solve this problem ?
Best regards
I use wicket 1.4.15
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/file/n3296950/Wicket-test.rar
Wicket-test.rar
-
Duto
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/StatelessForm-growing-url-when-there-is-errorvalidation-tp3296950p3296950.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: When 1.4.16 going to be released
Ajax-enclosures would be nice ;) 2011/2/9 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com: is there anything particularly important in it that you need? -igor On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Przemek Kubicki prze...@consol.pl wrote: Hi folks, anyone know when 1.4.16 will get released? Cheers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: When 1.4.16 going to be released
Hey, WICKET-3321 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3321 is crucial for us. It is already fixed. We need to release our product version asap. Without 1.4.16 we would need to patch the wicket, but i'd like to avoid it. Cheers, W dniu 09.02.2011 17:25, Igor Vaynberg pisze: is there anything particularly important in it that you need? -igor On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Przemek Kubickiprze...@consol.pl wrote: Hi folks, anyone know when 1.4.16 will get released? Cheers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: When 1.4.16 going to be released
i may have time this weekend. may being the operative word. you dont need to patch the version of wicket, just use the latest snapshot jar. -igor On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Przemek Kubicki prze...@consol.pl wrote: Hey, WICKET-3321 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3321 is crucial for us. It is already fixed. We need to release our product version asap. Without 1.4.16 we would need to patch the wicket, but i'd like to avoid it. Cheers, W dniu 09.02.2011 17:25, Igor Vaynberg pisze: is there anything particularly important in it that you need? -igor On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Przemek Kubickiprze...@consol.pl wrote: Hi folks, anyone know when 1.4.16 will get released? Cheers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
what doctype should I use
please suggest what doctype should I use to make IE work , and not cause any new issues. i am not sure If my application is xhtml or just html , I am not sure if every thing is valid , in this case what would be the right doctype for my pages , please suggest me. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/what-doctype-should-I-use-tp3297678p3297678.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: what doctype should I use
Hi! Use !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd; It is not strict. However, nothing will guarantee things will work in IE. ** Martin 2011/2/9 fachhoch fachh...@gmail.com: please suggest what doctype should I use to make IE work , and not cause any new issues. i am not sure If my application is xhtml or just html , I am not sure if every thing is valid , in this case what would be the right doctype for my pages , please suggest me. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/what-doctype-should-I-use-tp3297678p3297678.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: what doctype should I use
This has nothing to do with Wicket. I would recommend researching selfhtml (http://de.selfhtml.org/) since you seem to be from Germany. On 09.02.2011 17:58, fachhoch wrote: please suggest what doctype should I use to make IE work , and not cause any new issues. i am not sure If my application is xhtml or just html , I am not sure if every thing is valid , in this case what would be the right doctype for my pages , please suggest me. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: StatelessForm growing url when there is errorvalidation
I already attach on my first post a sample (quickstart) : http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/file/n3296950/Wicket-test.rar I fill too a jira ticket : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3438 Best regards - Duto -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/StatelessForm-growing-url-when-there-is-errorvalidation-tp3296950p3298027.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Estimated number of developers in the Wicket community
Does anyone have an update over this? It seems the website http://people.apache.org/~coar/mlists.html#wicket.apache.org does not show anymore the Wicket dashboard. I'm looking for a number of active members on the mailing list (also, number of messages). -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Estimated-number-of-developers-in-the-Wicket-community-tp2717811p3298036.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Estimated number of developers in the Wicket community
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Bruno Borges bruno.bor...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone have an update over this? It seems the website http://people.apache.org/~coar/mlists.html#wicket.apache.org does not show anymore the Wicket dashboard. I'm looking for a number of active members on the mailing list (also, number of messages). I wrote the person that generated that and asked about it since it appears that it is way out of date and is obviously missing many lists. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://wickettraining.com *Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*
DropDownChoice-Choose One Selected Item
Hi Is there a way I can have the selected option on a DropDownChoice to be set with one of the items in the Model instead of ' Choose One' as the selected item by default? I know this has been asked around in a different sense but I could not find a closer match to this. Code Snippet ListCountry countryList =service.getCountries(); ChoiceRendererCountry defaultChoiceRenderer = new ChoiceRendererCountry(Constants.NAME, Constants.ID); countryChoice = new DropDownChoiceCountry(Constants.ADDRESS_COUNTRY, countryList, defaultChoiceRenderer); //Would like the countryChoice to be able to have the First Contry in the countrList to be the one rendered instead of 'Choose One'. Thanks and if it seems redundant do pardon me Cheers -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DropDownChoice-Choose-One-Selected-Item-tp3298535p3298535.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DropDownChoice-Choose One Selected Item
The DDC will reflect whatever is in its model (the model for the selected value, not the one for the list of items to choose from). So, just set your model. On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Niv nivedan.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Is there a way I can have the selected option on a DropDownChoice to be set with one of the items in the Model instead of ' Choose One' as the selected item by default? I know this has been asked around in a different sense but I could not find a closer match to this. Code Snippet ListCountry countryList =service.getCountries(); ChoiceRendererCountry defaultChoiceRenderer = new ChoiceRendererCountry(Constants.NAME, Constants.ID); countryChoice = new DropDownChoiceCountry(Constants.ADDRESS_COUNTRY, countryList, defaultChoiceRenderer); //Would like the countryChoice to be able to have the First Contry in the countrList to be the one rendered instead of 'Choose One'. Thanks and if it seems redundant do pardon me Cheers -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DropDownChoice-Choose-One-Selected-Item-tp3298535p3298535.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Best Wicket security practice
Apache shiro is one more - http://shiro.apache.org/ On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:14 AM, sakthi vel vela@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, There are few security things in wicket like SWARM, Spring security with wicket and so on. Could anyone tell the best security practice in wicket and any possible links would be great.
Re: DropDownChoice-Choose One Selected Item
Hi!
You can do defaultChoiceRenderer.setDefaultModelObject(xxx)
Or if you don't want to dirty it, you can use
public static T extends FormComponent? void fakeRawInput(T
formComponent, T existingComponent) {
try {
String rawInput = (String) rawInputField.get(existingComponent);
fakeRawInput(formComponent, rawInput);
} catch (Exception e) {
Utils.errorLog(WicketUtils.class, Fatal Error: Form field
access failed., e);
}
}
2011/2/10 Niv nivedan.t...@gmail.com:
Hi
Is there a way I can have the selected option on a DropDownChoice to be set
with one of the items in the Model instead of ' Choose One' as the
selected item by default? I know this has been asked around in a different
sense but I could not find a closer match to this.
Code Snippet
ListCountry countryList =service.getCountries();
ChoiceRendererCountry defaultChoiceRenderer = new
ChoiceRendererCountry(Constants.NAME, Constants.ID);
countryChoice = new DropDownChoiceCountry(Constants.ADDRESS_COUNTRY,
countryList, defaultChoiceRenderer);
//Would like the countryChoice to be able to have the First Contry in the
countrList to be the one rendered instead of 'Choose One'.
Thanks and if it seems redundant do pardon me
Cheers
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DropDownChoice-Choose-One-Selected-Item-tp3298535p3298535.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DropDownChoice-Choose One Selected Item
@James - Thank you will try that out and get back.
@Martin - Thanks mate will get back I guess I am using 1.4.9 version and
don't have the option to setDefaultModelObject on the ChoiceRenderer anyhow
appreciate your time and thoughts to write back.
Thanks again
Nive
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Hi!
You can do defaultChoiceRenderer.setDefaultModelObject(xxx)
Or if you don't want to dirty it, you can use
public static T extends FormComponent? void fakeRawInput(T
formComponent, T existingComponent) {
try {
String rawInput = (String) rawInputField.get(existingComponent);
fakeRawInput(formComponent, rawInput);
} catch (Exception e) {
Utils.errorLog(WicketUtils.class, Fatal Error: Form field
access failed., e);
}
}
2011/2/10 Niv nivedan.t...@gmail.com:
Hi
Is there a way I can have the selected option on a DropDownChoice to be
set
with one of the items in the Model instead of ' Choose One' as the
selected item by default? I know this has been asked around in a
different
sense but I could not find a closer match to this.
Code Snippet
ListCountry countryList =service.getCountries();
ChoiceRendererCountry defaultChoiceRenderer = new
ChoiceRendererCountry(Constants.NAME, Constants.ID);
countryChoice = new DropDownChoiceCountry(Constants.ADDRESS_COUNTRY,
countryList, defaultChoiceRenderer);
//Would like the countryChoice to be able to have the First Contry in the
countrList to be the one rendered instead of 'Choose One'.
Thanks and if it seems redundant do pardon me
Cheers
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DropDownChoice-Choose-One-Selected-Item-tp3298535p3298535.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
