Re: formComponentPanel with content generated by RepeatingView
hej, on the second thought I can implement (in this simple case) a model backuped by List or Set and then let Form (or FormComponentPanel) to process all fields. pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Understanding Wicket 1.5 page mapping
Hi, I'm really keen to have a clearer understanding of the page mapping changes in Wicket 1.5 - right now it is still not totally clear in my mind. The best way to explain is by highlighting some requirements I have based on the URL scheme we are trying to achieve in a project. We have the concept of Locations and Categories. To visit a location page, the following URL would be used: www.mycompany.com/someLocation To visit a category page, the URL would be: www.mycompany.com/someCategory Additionally, a search page exists combining a location and a category - the url being: www.mycompany.com/someLocation/someCategory So we have three page types: - Location page - Category page - Combination location and category page (a search page) I've not found a solution to implementing this URL scheme using Wicket. One issue being that the URLs are dynamic, i.e. we need to lookup locations and categories from a database to determine whether a specified URL is actually a location page, category page, search page or none of the above. The steps would be: 1. If only a single path... 2. If it is a valid category, forward to CategoryPage.class 3. If it is a valid location, forward to LocationPage.class 4. If there is a second path element (validLocation/validCategory) forward to SearchPage.class 5. If no matching page found by now, fall through to other mappers/handlers to handle the URL My problem up to now is that none of these pages is prefixed with anything to uniquely identify them, e.g. /location/someLocation /category/someCategory and thus I need to perform logic (including database calls) to determine the semantics of the URL before I know what the intended destination is. Hopefully I've been clear enough as to what the issue is I'm trying to solve. Having briefly read up about the great work that is being done in Wicket 1.5, I'm thinking that maybe I could achieve this now. I'd be really grateful for some ideas/opinions on this. Thanks, dz -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Understanding-Wicket-1-5-page-mapping-tp3467619p3467619.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Understanding Wicket 1.5 page mapping
Hi, Create a new IRequestMapper and set it as root mapper - see the examples for HttpsMapper and CryptoMapper to see how. This new mapper will process the URL and decide which page to use (CategoryPage vs. LocationPage) and use BookmarkablePageRequestHandler to render it. The new mapper should be compound (ICompoundRequestMapper) and fallback to default mappers for Wicket internal works (link/form listeners, ajax, ...). Have fun! On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:46 AM, drewzilla80 andrew.eas...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm really keen to have a clearer understanding of the page mapping changes in Wicket 1.5 - right now it is still not totally clear in my mind. The best way to explain is by highlighting some requirements I have based on the URL scheme we are trying to achieve in a project. We have the concept of Locations and Categories. To visit a location page, the following URL would be used: www.mycompany.com/someLocation To visit a category page, the URL would be: www.mycompany.com/someCategory Additionally, a search page exists combining a location and a category - the url being: www.mycompany.com/someLocation/someCategory So we have three page types: - Location page - Category page - Combination location and category page (a search page) I've not found a solution to implementing this URL scheme using Wicket. One issue being that the URLs are dynamic, i.e. we need to lookup locations and categories from a database to determine whether a specified URL is actually a location page, category page, search page or none of the above. The steps would be: 1. If only a single path... 2. If it is a valid category, forward to CategoryPage.class 3. If it is a valid location, forward to LocationPage.class 4. If there is a second path element (validLocation/validCategory) forward to SearchPage.class 5. If no matching page found by now, fall through to other mappers/handlers to handle the URL My problem up to now is that none of these pages is prefixed with anything to uniquely identify them, e.g. /location/someLocation /category/someCategory and thus I need to perform logic (including database calls) to determine the semantics of the URL before I know what the intended destination is. Hopefully I've been clear enough as to what the issue is I'm trying to solve. Having briefly read up about the great work that is being done in Wicket 1.5, I'm thinking that maybe I could achieve this now. I'd be really grateful for some ideas/opinions on this. Thanks, dz -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Understanding-Wicket-1-5-page-mapping-tp3467619p3467619.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Understanding Wicket 1.5 page mapping
Hey Martin. Thanks for the awesome reply speed! It is amazing how committed you guys are to solving the real world problems we face as developers. Wicket is such a cool framework and it's great to see these new features constantly evolving to add the sort of flexibility needed when there's an SEO analyst breathing down your neck! Thanks again! dz -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Understanding-Wicket-1-5-page-mapping-tp3467619p3467643.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Understanding Wicket 1.5 page mapping
Martin, Just playing with the code now - I'm afraid I'm not sure exactly what you mean by: The new mapper should be compound (ICompoundRequestMapper) and fallback to default mappers for Wicket internal works (link/form listeners, ajax, ...) Could you elaborate briefly on this piece? Thanks, dz -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Understanding-Wicket-1-5-page-mapping-tp3467619p3467769.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
mountPage(...) issuing a 302 redirect
I'm using Wicket 1.5-rc2 and have noticed that I'm getting what I believe to be unnecessary 302 redirects for bookmarkable/stateless pages. In my application.init(), I'm doing the following: mountPage(/myPage, MyPage.class) When I request this page in my browser at http://localhost:8080/myPage, the application issues a 302 Found response to which the client responds to by making a second request to http://localhost:8080/myPage from which it receives a 200 OK response. I'm also see this with the homepage as well, i.e. a request to http://localhost:8080/ I can see that, under the covers, Wicket is creating a RenderPageRequestHandler for bookmarkable pages with the default redirect policy of AUTO_REDIRECT. The code has a comment to specify under which conditions a redirect with be issued when auto redirect policy is in use. However, I'm not convinced a redirect should be taking place in this situation. It makes me feel nervous that I don't really understand this behaviour. I started an earlier thread about building my own root request mapper, within which I'm creating a RenderPageRequestHandler that specifies REDIRECT_NEVER, but I'm concerned about fiddling with these settings when I clearly seem to be missing some form of understanding about it. Can someone explain why I might be getting the 302 redirect for what is a completely static page? Thanks, dz -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/mountPage-issuing-a-302-redirect-tp3468114p3468114.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Fwd: wicket 1.5-rc2 and aggregate jar for osgi
Hi, sorry I read your reply only today...
I got basically to the same results yesterday, but I've some problem which I
summarized in the last message in this thread on felix mailing list:
http://old.nabble.com/A-better-life%3A-quick-webapp-deploy-to31334158.html
I'll go into details point by point.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Eike Kettner n...@eknet.org wrote:
Hi Daniele,
I might have not understood your concern well enough... But here is what I
do: I deploy a really small war file (without any deps of course) into the
osgi container (I use felix...). There is another bundle from pax,
called pax-web-extender, that listens for war files coming into the
container and will then register them on the embedded jetty instance.
I use the following pax bundles:
* org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-extender-war
* org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-jetty-bundle
* org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-jsp (might be superfluous)
yeah I've everything installed. I do not remember what osgi features
installed this but there is:
[ 54] [Active ] [] [ ] [ 60] OPS4J Pax Web -
Runtime (1.0.1)
[ 55] [Active ] [] [ ] [ 60] OPS4J Pax Web - API
(1.0.1)
[ 56] [Active ] [] [ ] [ 60] OPS4J Pax Web - Jetty
(1.0.1)
[ 57] [Active ] [] [ ] [ 60] OPS4J Pax Web -
Service SPI (1.0.1)
[ 59] [Active ] [] [ ] [ 60] OPS4J Pax Web -
Extender - Whiteboard (1.0.1)
[ 60] [Active ] [] [ ] [ 60] OPS4J Pax Web -
FileInstall Deployer (1.0.1)
[ 61] [Active ] [] [ ] [ 60] OPS4J Pax Url - war:,
war-i: (1.2.5)
[ 62] [Active ] [] [ ] [ 60] OPS4J Pax Web -
Extender - WAR (1.0.1)
[ 63] [Active ] [] [ ] [ 60] OPS4J Pax Web - Jsp
Support (1.0.1)
on Karaf 2.2.0
Then I use the felix-bundle plugin to create a MANIFEST.MF for my war
file. It looks like that:
plugins
plugin
groupIdorg.apache.felix/groupId
artifactIdmaven-bundle-plugin/artifactId
executions
execution
idbundle-manifest/id
phaseprocess-classes/phase
goals
goalmanifest/goal
/goals
/execution
/executions
configuration
supportedProjectTypes
supportedProjectTypejar/supportedProjectType
supportedProjectTypewar/supportedProjectType
supportedProjectTypebundle/supportedProjectType
/supportedProjectTypes
instructions
_include-osgi.bnd/_include
/instructions
/configuration
/plugin
plugin
groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId
artifactIdmaven-war-plugin/artifactId
configuration
archive
manifestFile
${project.build.outputDirectory}/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
/manifestFile
/archive
/configuration
/plugin
/plugins
it's almost the same as mine, also the war-plugin config is identical.
I do not have
_include-osgi.bnd/_include
but I have this instructions
_wabsrc/main/webapp/_wab
Web-ContextPath/myApp/Web-ContextPath
There are some more instructions in the osgi.bnd file. You could have
written them directly in the instructions section of the bundle plugin:
Bundle-Classpath: ., WEB-INF/classes
Web-ContextPath: mywebapp
DynamicImport-Package: *
Webapp-Context: mywebapp
It seems that maven-bundle-plugin, at least 2.3.4 version, automatically
add Bundle-Classpath: WEB-INF/classes if the project is a WAR or have a
Webapp-Context (that make the bundle a WAB, as for OSGI in Action), in fact
I do not have that intructions and the war project Bundle-Classpath:
WEB-INF/classes in the MANIFEST (note, without the dot).
I think also that Webapp-Context has been deprecated in favor of the new
Web-ContextPath you also have.
As for DynamicImport-Package: *
what does this do?
It does not seem you do not have specific Import or Export package
instructions, so you use the maven-bundle-plugin defaults, so every dep is
explicitly written in the MANIFEST right?
This creates a MANIFEST with Import-Package statements for all your
dependencies - they are not included in the war file. The war file has
no /lib folder, just WEB-INF/classes and META-INF/ are there. The bundle
classpath is extended to include the classes in WEB-INF/classes. I
use the scope provided for all dependencies.
where do you specify the provided scope? In all the maven deps explicitly?
There is not a way to tell just maven-bundle-plugin to consider everything
as provided just when building the bundle? I think that this is the reason
why you do not have jars in the lib folder, right?
When the war file is deployed to the osgi container, the pax bundles
from above will make it available to jetty.
In fact, it seems that if I just manually remove the jars
Re: mountPage(...) issuing a 302 redirect
Try with trunk. I believe this is fixed. On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:51 PM, drewzilla80 andrew.eas...@gmail.com wrote: I'm using Wicket 1.5-rc2 and have noticed that I'm getting what I believe to be unnecessary 302 redirects for bookmarkable/stateless pages. In my application.init(), I'm doing the following: mountPage(/myPage, MyPage.class) When I request this page in my browser at http://localhost:8080/myPage, the application issues a 302 Found response to which the client responds to by making a second request to http://localhost:8080/myPage from which it receives a 200 OK response. I'm also see this with the homepage as well, i.e. a request to http://localhost:8080/ I can see that, under the covers, Wicket is creating a RenderPageRequestHandler for bookmarkable pages with the default redirect policy of AUTO_REDIRECT. The code has a comment to specify under which conditions a redirect with be issued when auto redirect policy is in use. However, I'm not convinced a redirect should be taking place in this situation. It makes me feel nervous that I don't really understand this behaviour. I started an earlier thread about building my own root request mapper, within which I'm creating a RenderPageRequestHandler that specifies REDIRECT_NEVER, but I'm concerned about fiddling with these settings when I clearly seem to be missing some form of understanding about it. Can someone explain why I might be getting the 302 redirect for what is a completely static page? Thanks, dz -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/mountPage-issuing-a-302-redirect-tp3468114p3468114.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Understanding Wicket 1.5 page mapping
Ignore this. getRootRequestMapperAsCompound() will convert it for you anyway. Just follow how Https and Crypto mappers work On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:54 PM, drewzilla80 andrew.eas...@gmail.com wrote: Martin, Just playing with the code now - I'm afraid I'm not sure exactly what you mean by: The new mapper should be compound (ICompoundRequestMapper) and fallback to default mappers for Wicket internal works (link/form listeners, ajax, ...) Could you elaborate briefly on this piece? Thanks, dz -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Understanding-Wicket-1-5-page-mapping-tp3467619p3467769.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Understanding Wicket 1.5 page mapping
Thanks, Martin. That's what I already ended up doing as it turns out (I dug into the code and noticed the method you specified). I've got my whole original use case working very nicely indeed - thanks for your help. dz -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Understanding-Wicket-1-5-page-mapping-tp3467619p3468850.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
[MIGRATE 1.5] NPE trying to use JavaScriptTemplate
Hi,
I've just started preparing for 1.5 and have been modifying my code in
order to conform with the new API. I've managed to get my application to
compile and launch, but in my first attempt to render a page I get an NPE
as follows:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.wicket.util.template.TextTemplateDecorator.setLastModified(TextTemplateDecorator.java:195)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.resource.AbstractStringResourceStream.init(AbstractStringResourceStream.java:76)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.resource.AbstractStringResourceStream.init(AbstractStringResourceStream.java:62)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.template.TextTemplate.init(TextTemplate.java:42)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.template.TextTemplateDecorator.init(TextTemplateDecorator.java:52)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.template.JavaScriptTemplate.init(JavaScriptTemplate.java:42)
at assets.wicket.ovimaps.OviMap.renderHead(OviMap.java:46)
at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderHead(Component.java:2644)
Now this part of the code is an adaptation of what used to be a
template-based javascript header contribution as follows:
add(TextTemplateHeaderContributor.forJavaScript(OviMap.class,
OviMap.js, model));
The above has been removed from the component constructor (where it used
to be) and replaced with the following in code inside my component:
@Override
public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) {
super.renderHead(response);
JavaScriptTemplate template = new JavaScriptTemplate(
new PackagedTextTemplate(OviMap.class, OviMap.js));
response.renderString(template.asString(model.getObject()));
}
What am I doing wrong?
P.S. I am using 1.5-rc2.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: formComponentPanel with content generated by RepeatingView
You can set any model in your form component panel. But its value will be set during the form processing, after the validation step. FormComponent#convertInput is invoked before the validation step, and it only sets the converted input in the FormComponent (see FormComponent#setConvertedInput). It don't set the model already. On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:12 AM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: hej, on the second thought I can implement (in this simple case) a model backuped by List or Set and then let Form (or FormComponentPanel) to process all fields. pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: [MIGRATE 1.5] NPE trying to use JavaScriptTemplate
Move to 1.5-RC3, if this problem remains report in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3187
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Alexandros Karypidis akary...@yahoo.grwrote:
Hi,
I've just started preparing for 1.5 and have been modifying my code in
order to conform with the new API. I've managed to get my application to
compile and launch, but in my first attempt to render a page I get an NPE as
follows:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.wicket.util.template.TextTemplateDecorator.setLastModified(TextTemplateDecorator.java:195)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.resource.AbstractStringResourceStream.init(AbstractStringResourceStream.java:76)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.resource.AbstractStringResourceStream.init(AbstractStringResourceStream.java:62)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.template.TextTemplate.init(TextTemplate.java:42)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.template.TextTemplateDecorator.init(TextTemplateDecorator.java:52)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.template.JavaScriptTemplate.init(JavaScriptTemplate.java:42)
at assets.wicket.ovimaps.OviMap.renderHead(OviMap.java:46)
at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderHead(Component.java:2644)
Now this part of the code is an adaptation of what used to be a
template-based javascript header contribution as follows:
add(TextTemplateHeaderContributor.forJavaScript(OviMap.class,
OviMap.js, model));
The above has been removed from the component constructor (where it used to
be) and replaced with the following in code inside my component:
@Override
public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) {
super.renderHead(response);
JavaScriptTemplate template = new JavaScriptTemplate(
new PackagedTextTemplate(OviMap.class, OviMap.js));
response.renderString(template.asString(model.getObject()));
}
What am I doing wrong?
P.S. I am using 1.5-rc2.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
