date:20110818

Enable DEBUG logging for org.apache.wicket.Localizer and see what is attempted.

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:38 PM, McDulin, Bill
bmcdu...@cardinalsolutions.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I am using the BigDecimalConverter which is being fired before the Validation 
 occurs inside of a form. This is then in turn calling the onError inside of 
 my Form. I was curious as to what the resource key value is that is being 
 returned so that I can customize it for some custom message.

 Thanks,

 Bill McDulin
 Cardinal Solutions Group, Inc.
 cell: (513) 889-6686
 http://www.cardinalsolutions.com/
 bmcdu...@cardinalsolutions.commailto:bmcdu...@cardinalsolutions.com
 This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the
 sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
 private, confidential and/or privileged information. Any
 unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
 prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
 employee or agent responsible for delivering this message,
 please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
 copies of the original e-mail message.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: onchane not working with jquery numeric plugin

2011-08-18 Thread Rodrigo Heffner

Hi Rebecca,

I'm quite new to wicket but I've had a similar problem before. I would
imagine that the jquery function must be binded to the same behaviour
(onchange) that you're using in your code.

If you change your code to be triggered onblur, does this happen as well?
On 18 Aug 2011 06:31, rebecca rivka.shis...@gmail.com wrote:
 hello,

 I'm using wicket 1.4.16.
 I have a simple text field component on a phone number panel.
 I used TexoTela's jquery plugin jquery.numeric to enable only numeric
 input to the text field.
 I added it in a script block in the html file of this phone number
panel:

 $(function(){
 $('.numericPhone').numeric();
 }

 Everything worked fine.

 Than I added AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange) to this number
 text field.
 The onchage was not called (ie - it didn't get into onUpdate/onError).

 Only when i removed the use of the numeric plugin - the ajax worked.

 Do you have an idea what am i doing wrong?

 Thanks
 Rebecca


 --
 View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/onchane-not-working-with-jquery-numeric-plugin-tp3751788p3751788.html
 Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Simple non ajax callback

2011-08-18 Thread nino martinez wael

ok that was also what I looked into but was unsure if there was
another even simpler way.

Thanks
-Nino

2011/8/17 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
 see how Link does it... all you need to do is implement one of the
 listener interfaces and call urlfor(component, interface) to generate
 a callback url..

 -igor


 On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:22 AM, nino martinez wael
 nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi i could not find a simple way todo non ajax callbacks. Its very simple to
 extend the abstractajaxdefaultbehavior. But could not find something similar
 for non ajax. Did i miss something? I figure its because if youre using
 javascript you might aswell do ajax?


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Simple non ajax callback

mount a Page or Resource at given url and fire requests to that url ...

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:33 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
 ok that was also what I looked into but was unsure if there was
 another even simpler way.

 Thanks
 -Nino

 2011/8/17 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
 see how Link does it... all you need to do is implement one of the
 listener interfaces and call urlfor(component, interface) to generate
 a callback url..

 -igor


 On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:22 AM, nino martinez wael
 nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi i could not find a simple way todo non ajax callbacks. Its very simple to
 extend the abstractajaxdefaultbehavior. But could not find something similar
 for non ajax. Did i miss something? I figure its because if youre using
 javascript you might aswell do ajax?


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: onchange not working with jquery numeric plugin

2011-08-18 Thread rebecca

The ajax did work with onkeyup but i really need the onchange event.
What do you mean by the jquery function must be binded to the same
behaviour ?

Thanks
Rebecca

--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/onchane-not-working-with-jquery-numeric-plugin-tp3751788p3752004.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

onValidate() not called by FormTester.submit()

Hi all,

I have a little problem to test a form in my application.
I have a FileUploadField with an abstractValidator like that :
FileUploadField fuploadField = new
FileUploadField(uploadImage, new ModelFileUpload());
fuploadField.add(new AbstractValidatorFileUpload() {
@Override
protected void onValidate(IValidatableFileUpload
validatable) {
System.err.println(Passage dans le validateur);
FileUpload fupload = (FileUpload)
validatable.getValue();
if(fupload != null){
if(fupload.getSize() == 0){
error(validatable);
}
else
if(!Utils.checkContentType(fupload.getContentType())){
error(validatable);
}
}
}
});

when I test manually this form with wrong image type, validation works well.

I try to test this validator with wicketTester like that :
@Test @Transactional @Rollback
public void testStory23_TA13(){
tester.startPage(CreationQuestionnairePage.class);
tester.assertRenderedPage(CreationQuestionnairePage.class);

String titre = nouveau questionnaire;
FormTester formTester =
tester.newFormTester(formCreationQuestionnaire);
formTester.setValue(titre, titre);
formTester.setValue(numero, 10);
formTester.select(sexeDestinataire, 0);

formTester.setValue(conteneurQuestions:question:1:texteQuestion,
question 1);
formTester.setValue(conteneurQuestions:question:1:legende,
legende question 1);
formTester.setValue(conteneurQuestions:question:1:uploadImage,
/Users/mathildepellerin/Desktop/moto.JPG);
formTester.submit();

tester.assertErrorMessages(new String[]{Question 1 : Image trop
volumineuse. La taille des images est limitée à 50k.});
}

but onValidate() method of my validator is never called.
It's not an ajax form, and I can check error messages send by required
fields without any problem.
Is there something else to do to test our own validator?

Thanks.
M.

-- 
*Mathilde Pellerin*
Ingénieur en développement de logiciel

STATLIFE
tel : 01.42.11.64.88
mail : mathilde.pelle...@statlife.fr

Re: onchane not working with jquery numeric plugin

It sounds like TexoTela plugin kills the JavaScript event, i.e. it
does something like: event.preventDefault(), event.stopPropagation().
Better check the plugin code and see what happens.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:30 AM, rebecca rivka.shis...@gmail.com wrote:
 hello,

 I'm using wicket 1.4.16.
 I have a simple text field component on a phone number panel.
 I used TexoTela's jquery plugin jquery.numeric to enable only numeric
 input to the text field.
 I added it in a script block in the html file of this phone number panel:

 $(function(){
    $('.numericPhone').numeric();
 }

 Everything worked fine.

 Than I added AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange) to this number
 text field.
 The onchage was not called (ie - it didn't get into onUpdate/onError).

 Only when i removed the use of the numeric plugin - the ajax worked.

 Do you have an idea what am i doing wrong?

 Thanks
 Rebecca


 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/onchane-not-working-with-jquery-numeric-plugin-tp3751788p3751788.html
 Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: onchange not working with jquery numeric plugin

2011-08-18 Thread Rodrigo Heffner

I mean that the numeric() function may have logic that changes / overrides
wicket's onchange calls, either the numeric() function works or (if
removed) the AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior works.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:03 AM, rebecca rivka.shis...@gmail.com wrote:

 The ajax did work with onkeyup but i really need the onchange event.
 What do you mean by the jquery function must be binded to the same
 behaviour ?

 Thanks
 Rebecca

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/onchane-not-working-with-jquery-numeric-plugin-tp3751788p3752004.html
 Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-- 
Rodrigo H M Bezerra

Re: Wicket-auth issue

Indeed this check looks wrong.
Please file a ticket in our Jira to fix it.

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:11 PM, mathieu.marcotte-gag...@bell.ca
mathieu.marcotte-gag...@bell.ca wrote:
 Hi wicket developers and users,

 I am developing a web application that uses the wicket-auth framework 1.4.17,
 more specifically the following class :

 org.apache.wicket.authorization.strategies.role.annotations.AnnotationsRoleAuthorizationStrategy

 and I am experiencing an issue that I think might be a bug (but I'm not sure, 
 it might be
 that I'm doing something wrong). I am using an annotation like below :

        @AuthorizeAction(action = ..., roles = ...)

 However I have found that I am always denied access to the page. I have 
 traced the reason
 of the access to the following code, in method check of the above class :

        if (hasAny(new Roles(authorizeActionAnnotation.deny(
        {
                return false;
        }

 The deny list returned by authorizeActionAnnotation.deny() is empty, 
 therefore hasAny
 always returns true, which means that when the deny list is empty you are 
 always denied
 access to the page!

 Maybe it's a feature but it sounds like counter-intuitive to me :) Using the 
 following
 annotation did fix the issue :

        @AuthorizeAction(action = ..., deny=dummyRoleToDeny, roles = ...)

 Am I doing something wrong, or is it really intended that if you don't 
 specify a deny list
 then you are always denied access?

 Thanks


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: onValidate() not called by FormTester.submit()

little precision : it the same thing for file size validation.
I have a maxSize to my form :
form.setMaxSize(Bytes.kilobytes(50));

when I test it manually, I have error message, but not when I test it by
wicketTester and formTester...
I don't understand what I forgot or what I doing wrong in my test.



2011/8/18 Mathilde Pellerin mathilde.pelle...@statlife.fr

 Hi all,

 I have a little problem to test a form in my application.
 I have a FileUploadField with an abstractValidator like that :
 FileUploadField fuploadField = new
 FileUploadField(uploadImage, new ModelFileUpload());
 fuploadField.add(new AbstractValidatorFileUpload() {
 @Override
 protected void onValidate(IValidatableFileUpload
 validatable) {
 System.err.println(Passage dans le validateur);
 FileUpload fupload = (FileUpload)
 validatable.getValue();
 if(fupload != null){
 if(fupload.getSize() == 0){
 error(validatable);
 }
 else
 if(!Utils.checkContentType(fupload.getContentType())){
 error(validatable);
 }
 }
 }
 });

 when I test manually this form with wrong image type, validation works
 well.
 I try to test this validator with wicketTester like that :
 @Test @Transactional @Rollback
 public void testStory23_TA13(){
 tester.startPage(CreationQuestionnairePage.class);
 tester.assertRenderedPage(CreationQuestionnairePage.class);

 String titre = nouveau questionnaire;
 FormTester formTester =
 tester.newFormTester(formCreationQuestionnaire);
 formTester.setValue(titre, titre);
 formTester.setValue(numero, 10);
 formTester.select(sexeDestinataire, 0);

 formTester.setValue(conteneurQuestions:question:1:texteQuestion,
 question 1);
 formTester.setValue(conteneurQuestions:question:1:legende,
 legende question 1);
 formTester.setValue(conteneurQuestions:question:1:uploadImage,
 /Users/mathildepellerin/Desktop/moto.JPG);
 formTester.submit();

 tester.assertErrorMessages(new String[]{Question 1 : Image trop
 volumineuse. La taille des images est limitée à 50k.});
 }

 but onValidate() method of my validator is never called.
 It's not an ajax form, and I can check error messages send by required
 fields without any problem.
 Is there something else to do to test our own validator?

 Thanks.
 M.

 --
 *Mathilde Pellerin*
 Ingénieur en développement de logiciel

 STATLIFE
 tel : 01.42.11.64.88
 mail : mathilde.pelle...@statlife.fr






-- 
*Mathilde Pellerin*
Ingénieur en développement de logiciel

STATLIFE
tel : 01.42.11.64.88
mail : mathilde.pelle...@statlife.fr

Re: onValidate() not called by FormTester.submit()

Which version of Wicket ?
Looking at both 1.4.x and 1.5-SNAPSHOT code I think validation should
be executed.
1.5 code is much cleaner ...

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Mathilde Pellerin
mathilde.pelle...@statlife.fr wrote:
 little precision : it the same thing for file size validation.
 I have a maxSize to my form :
        form.setMaxSize(Bytes.kilobytes(50));

 when I test it manually, I have error message, but not when I test it by
 wicketTester and formTester...
 I don't understand what I forgot or what I doing wrong in my test.



 2011/8/18 Mathilde Pellerin mathilde.pelle...@statlife.fr

 Hi all,

 I have a little problem to test a form in my application.
 I have a FileUploadField with an abstractValidator like that :
             FileUploadField fuploadField = new
 FileUploadField(uploadImage, new ModelFileUpload());
             fuploadField.add(new AbstractValidatorFileUpload() {
                 @Override
                 protected void onValidate(IValidatableFileUpload
 validatable) {
                     System.err.println(Passage dans le validateur);
                     FileUpload fupload = (FileUpload)
 validatable.getValue();
                     if(fupload != null){
                         if(fupload.getSize() == 0){
                             error(validatable);
                         }
                         else
 if(!Utils.checkContentType(fupload.getContentType())){
                             error(validatable);
                         }
                     }
                 }
             });

 when I test manually this form with wrong image type, validation works
 well.
 I try to test this validator with wicketTester like that :
     @Test @Transactional @Rollback
     public void testStory23_TA13(){
         tester.startPage(CreationQuestionnairePage.class);
         tester.assertRenderedPage(CreationQuestionnairePage.class);

         String titre = nouveau questionnaire;
         FormTester formTester =
 tester.newFormTester(formCreationQuestionnaire);
         formTester.setValue(titre, titre);
         formTester.setValue(numero, 10);
         formTester.select(sexeDestinataire, 0);

         formTester.setValue(conteneurQuestions:question:1:texteQuestion,
 question 1);
         formTester.setValue(conteneurQuestions:question:1:legende,
 legende question 1);
         formTester.setValue(conteneurQuestions:question:1:uploadImage,
 /Users/mathildepellerin/Desktop/moto.JPG);
         formTester.submit();

         tester.assertErrorMessages(new String[]{Question 1 : Image trop
 volumineuse. La taille des images est limitée à 50k.});
     }

 but onValidate() method of my validator is never called.
 It's not an ajax form, and I can check error messages send by required
 fields without any problem.
 Is there something else to do to test our own validator?

 Thanks.
 M.

 --
 *Mathilde Pellerin*
 Ingénieur en développement de logiciel

 STATLIFE
 tel : 01.42.11.64.88
 mail : mathilde.pelle...@statlife.fr






 --
 *Mathilde Pellerin*
 Ingénieur en développement de logiciel

 STATLIFE
 tel : 01.42.11.64.88
 mail : mathilde.pelle...@statlife.fr




-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: onValidate() not called by FormTester.submit()

I use Wicket 1.4.17.
Validation is not execute only when testing.
I mean, only validation of my FileUploadField : maxSize error and my own
abstractValidation errors are not executed.
It's why I thought I made a mistake in my test...

Re: onValidate() not called by FormTester.submit()

ticket+quickstart

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Mathilde Pellerin
mathilde.pelle...@statlife.fr wrote:
 I use Wicket 1.4.17.
 Validation is not execute only when testing.
 I mean, only validation of my FileUploadField : maxSize error and my own
 abstractValidation errors are not executed.
 It's why I thought I made a mistake in my test...




-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: onchane not working with jquery numeric plugin

2011-08-18 Thread rebecca

Hi Martin,

I checked the plug-in js file and did not find use of the functions you
mentioned.
Anyways, even with my poor JS knowledge i understood that there is a clash
with the plug-in.

Can you recommend of another package that i can use for client side numeric
restriction on text field.
Is there a wicket way to do it?

Thanks a lot
Rebecca

--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/onchane-not-working-with-jquery-numeric-plugin-tp3751788p3752095.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: onchane not working with jquery numeric plugin

The question is: do you really need this client side validation ?
If YES then override getAjaxCallDecorator of the
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior and do something like:

onDecorateScript(String script) {
  return if (parseInt(this.value) !== NaN) {  + script +  };

}

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:00 PM, rebecca rivka.shis...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Martin,

 I checked the plug-in js file and did not find use of the functions you
 mentioned.
 Anyways, even with my poor JS knowledge i understood that there is a clash
 with the plug-in.

 Can you recommend of another package that i can use for client side numeric
 restriction on text field.
 Is there a wicket way to do it?

 Thanks a lot
 Rebecca

 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/onchane-not-working-with-jquery-numeric-plugin-tp3751788p3752095.html
 Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: onValidate() not called by FormTester.submit()

you can find it here : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3973

Re: onValidate() not called by FormTester.submit()

thanks!

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Mathilde Pellerin
mathilde.pelle...@statlife.fr wrote:
 you can find it here : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3973




-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: onchane not working with jquery numeric plugin

2011-08-18 Thread rebecca

I wish things were dependent on what i need (it's a business requirement) :-)

About your example - I don't want to show a message on parse error, I just
don't want to let the user to input characters that are not numbers.


--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/onchane-not-working-with-jquery-numeric-plugin-tp3751788p3752224.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: onValidate() not called by FormTester.submit()

problem solved on Jira : I used formTester.setValue() instead of
formTester.setFile() in my tests.
With FormTester.setFile() it works well.
Thank you Martin for your help.

Log bookmarkable page link execution

2011-08-18 Thread Mike Mander


Hi,

i would like to log execution of bookmarkable page links. I know that 
they are only renderered in markup and call the page from the browser.


Maybe someone has a hint for me here?

Thanks
Mike

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Opening Wicket Page in New Browser Tab/Window

2011-08-18 Thread aksarben

How can I make a Wicket page open in a new browser tab/window? I'm not
talking about a popup, but a standard window. I have an app that needs to
open a GIS map viewer in a separate window, based on the user's current
context. The map viewer requires that I submit a form with GPS coordinates,
so I need Wicket to render some simple HTML with the coordinates in hidden
form fields, then submit the form to the map viewer URL as soon as the page
renders. This part is no problem. The problem is that Wicket renders the
HTML in the wrong window.

Currently, I'm using code to generate the link to invoke the map viewer:

*final MenuItem mapMenu = new EnmMenuItem(Map) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

@Override protected AbstractLink newLink(final String componentId) {
final SubmitLink link = new SubmitLink(componentId, form) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override public void onSubmit() {
selectMapMenu();
}
};
link.setDefaultFormProcessing(false);
link.setEnabled(true);
link.setRenderBodyOnly(false);
link.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(target, _blank));

return link;
}
};*

When the menu item is chosen, the following is invoked:

*@Override protected void selectMapMenu() {
for (final TrackSummary summary : grid.getSelectedItems()) {
try {
setResponsePage(new TrackMapRequestPage(summary.getSystemNumber()));
}
catch (final UnauthorizedPageError ex) {
error(ex.getMessage());
}
}
}*

Despite setting the link target to _blank, the TrackMapRequestPage opens
in the SAME window as the application. How can I make it open in a DIFFERENT
window so both windows are visible at the same time? My design specs says
the new window shouldn't be a popup.


--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Opening-Wicket-Page-in-New-Browser-Tab-Window-tp3752465p3752465.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket 1.5 and Automatic Link Disabling

2011-08-18 Thread Jonathan Locke

Well, even with HEAD of trunk, I'm still not getting link disabling so I may
try to create a quickstart. However, those funny errors trying to resolve
style.css have a workaround: simply stop using mountPackage and they go
away.

--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-1-5-and-Automatic-Link-Disabling-tp3748072p3752598.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket 1.5 and Automatic Link Disabling

add style.css problem in the quickstart too

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Jonathan Locke
jonathan.lo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Well, even with HEAD of trunk, I'm still not getting link disabling so I may
 try to create a quickstart. However, those funny errors trying to resolve
 style.css have a workaround: simply stop using mountPackage and they go
 away.

 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-1-5-and-Automatic-Link-Disabling-tp3748072p3752598.html
 Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Simple non ajax callback

2011-08-18 Thread Igor Vaynberg

how could it possibly be _even_ simpler?

-igor

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:33 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
 ok that was also what I looked into but was unsure if there was
 another even simpler way.

 Thanks
 -Nino

 2011/8/17 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
 see how Link does it... all you need to do is implement one of the
 listener interfaces and call urlfor(component, interface) to generate
 a callback url..

 -igor


 On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:22 AM, nino martinez wael
 nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi i could not find a simple way todo non ajax callbacks. Its very simple to
 extend the abstractajaxdefaultbehavior. But could not find something similar
 for non ajax. Did i miss something? I figure its because if youre using
 javascript you might aswell do ajax?


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: How to Handle ResourceStreamNotFoundException

2011-08-18 Thread hfriederichs

Firstly, thank you very much for your advice, it helps to a certain extend,
but it also raises new questions.

Unfortunately, there's only one way to determine whether a zip-file contains
an installation manual. Since the zip-file is on another server (where the
nexus repository resides), I have to read it from an InputStream. If there
isn't an installation manual, this reading can take up to 10 seconds.
Initially - when there's not a user entry yet, I can disable the
download-button. But once an application code is entered, I only render meta
information from all the zip-file versions, so the user can pick a desired
version (usually the most recent build). Only when the form is submitted, or
the new download button pressed, the corresponding zip-file is read, and
only then I can determine whether it contains an installation manual. But I
have to enable the button if there is a user entry. That can be a very
disapointing user experience. He/she starts the appication, the button is
disabled. He/she then enters an application code, en presses the now enabled
button, only to find out that there isn't an installation manual...

One question that comes to mind is: is my use case so exceptional? A button
for a resource is pressed, all I want is a nice feedback in case a resource
isn't available...
Personally, I'm not a great fan of disabling or 'invisibling' buttons. I
adhere to the five-year-old-boy-philosophy concerning buttons: you should
/allways/ be able to press them, that's what buttons are for.

Your alternative (using the RestartResponseException) solves the 'white
screen-problem', but there are a few drawbacks:
- The URL of my application after pressing the button changes from
http://localhost:9081/deploy/ to
http://localhost:9081/deploy/?wicket:interface=:3:deploytabs:panel:deployForm:downloadinstallationmanual::IResourceListener::.
I really like Wicket, but this is so annoying. Who wants this? I just want
my original url back - and yes, I read all the posts on mount strategies.
- What's worse, the user has entered an application code that generates
other field values (like a dropdownlists for the versions). When the page is
reloaded after a RestartResponseException, I want to initialize it with the
afore entered data. I managed to do that using PageParameters (or the
Session), but in that case the refresh button will always generate a
'prefilled' page, with the values of the lat entered application code.

Regards, Hans Friederichs

--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-Handle-ResourceStreamNotFoundException-tp3749331p3752826.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: How to Handle ResourceStreamNotFoundException

Hans,

Something like the following will probably work better for you. The key
concept is changing the request target. Sorry if my previous suggestion put
you down a dead end.

add(new LinkDeployVersion(manualLink, deployVersionModel) {
@Override
public void onClick() {
IResourceStream manualStream = getManualStream(getModelObject());
if (manualStream == null) {
error(no manual, sorry!);
}
else {
RequestCycle.get().setRequestTarget(new
ResourceStreamRequestTarget(manualStream));
}
}
});

Regards,
Dan

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:06 AM, hfriederichs h.friederi...@ohra.nl wrote:

Firstly, thank you very much for your advice, it helps to a certain extend,
but it also raises new questions.

Unfortunately, there's only one way to determine whether a zip-file
contains
an installation manual. Since the zip-file is on another server (where the
nexus repository resides), I have to read it from an InputStream. If there
isn't an installation manual, this reading can take up to 10 seconds.
Initially - when there's not a user entry yet, I can disable the
download-button. But once an application code is entered, I only render
meta
information from all the zip-file versions, so the user can pick a desired
version (usually the most recent build). Only when the form is submitted,
or
the new download button pressed, the corresponding zip-file is read, and
only then I can determine whether it contains an installation manual. But I
have to enable the button if there is a user entry. That can be a very
disapointing user experience. He/she starts the appication, the button is
disabled. He/she then enters an application code, en presses the now
enabled
button, only to find out that there isn't an installation manual...

http://localhost:9081/deploy/?wicket:interface=:3:deploytabs:panel:deployForm:downloadinstallationmanual::IResourceListener:
:.
I really like Wicket, but this is so annoying. Who wants this? I just want
my original url back - and yes, I read all the posts on mount strategies.
- What's worse, the user has entered an application code that generates
other field values (like a dropdownlists for the versions). When the page
is
reloaded after a RestartResponseException, I want to initialize it with the
afore entered data. I managed to do that using PageParameters (or the
Session), but in that case the refresh button will always generate a
'prefilled' page, with the values of the lat entered application code.

Regards, Hans Friederichs

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Opening Wicket Page in New Browser Tab/Window

Did you try putting target=_black on the form tag?

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:30 AM, aksarben rwada...@up.com wrote:

 How can I make a Wicket page open in a new browser tab/window? I'm not
 talking about a popup, but a standard window. I have an app that needs to
 open a GIS map viewer in a separate window, based on the user's current
 context. The map viewer requires that I submit a form with GPS coordinates,
 so I need Wicket to render some simple HTML with the coordinates in hidden
 form fields, then submit the form to the map viewer URL as soon as the page
 renders. This part is no problem. The problem is that Wicket renders the
 HTML in the wrong window.

 Currently, I'm using code to generate the link to invoke the map viewer:

 *final MenuItem mapMenu = new EnmMenuItem(Map) {
 private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

 @Override protected AbstractLink newLink(final String componentId) {
 final SubmitLink link = new SubmitLink(componentId, form) {
 private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
 @Override public void onSubmit() {
 selectMapMenu();
 }
 };
 link.setDefaultFormProcessing(false);
 link.setEnabled(true);
 link.setRenderBodyOnly(false);
 link.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(target, _blank));

 return link;
 }
 };*

 When the menu item is chosen, the following is invoked:

 *@Override protected void selectMapMenu() {
 for (final TrackSummary summary : grid.getSelectedItems()) {
 try {
 setResponsePage(new TrackMapRequestPage(summary.getSystemNumber()));
 }
 catch (final UnauthorizedPageError ex) {
 error(ex.getMessage());
 }
 }
 }*

 Despite setting the link target to _blank, the TrackMapRequestPage opens
 in the SAME window as the application. How can I make it open in a
 DIFFERENT
 window so both windows are visible at the same time? My design specs says
 the new window shouldn't be a popup.


 --
 View this message in context:
 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Opening-Wicket-Page-in-New-Browser-Tab-Window-tp3752465p3752465.html
 Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Opening Wicket Page in New Browser Tab/Window

s/black/blank/ :)

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Dan Retzlaff dretzl...@gmail.com wrote:

 Did you try putting target=_black on the form tag?


 On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:30 AM, aksarben rwada...@up.com wrote:

 How can I make a Wicket page open in a new browser tab/window? I'm not
 talking about a popup, but a standard window. I have an app that needs to
 open a GIS map viewer in a separate window, based on the user's current
 context. The map viewer requires that I submit a form with GPS
 coordinates,
 so I need Wicket to render some simple HTML with the coordinates in hidden
 form fields, then submit the form to the map viewer URL as soon as the
 page
 renders. This part is no problem. The problem is that Wicket renders the
 HTML in the wrong window.

 Currently, I'm using code to generate the link to invoke the map viewer:

 *final MenuItem mapMenu = new EnmMenuItem(Map) {
 private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

 @Override protected AbstractLink newLink(final String componentId) {
 final SubmitLink link = new SubmitLink(componentId, form) {
 private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
 @Override public void onSubmit() {
 selectMapMenu();
 }
 };
 link.setDefaultFormProcessing(false);
 link.setEnabled(true);
 link.setRenderBodyOnly(false);
 link.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(target, _blank));

 return link;
 }
 };*

 When the menu item is chosen, the following is invoked:

 *@Override protected void selectMapMenu() {
 for (final TrackSummary summary : grid.getSelectedItems()) {
 try {
 setResponsePage(new TrackMapRequestPage(summary.getSystemNumber()));
 }
 catch (final UnauthorizedPageError ex) {
 error(ex.getMessage());
 }
 }
 }*

 Despite setting the link target to _blank, the TrackMapRequestPage opens
 in the SAME window as the application. How can I make it open in a
 DIFFERENT
 window so both windows are visible at the same time? My design specs says
 the new window shouldn't be a popup.


 --
 View this message in context:
 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Opening-Wicket-Page-in-New-Browser-Tab-Window-tp3752465p3752465.html
 Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Log bookmarkable page link execution

Is your goal to understand which links are used to open certain bookmarkable
pages? If so, here's an approach that might get you started.

Create a Behavior which appends a tracking query parameter to
BookmarkablePageLinks. You could add it manually to each link you want to
track, or apply it application-wide through
an IComponentOnBeforeRenderListener registered with
Application#addPreComponentOnBeforeRenderListener(). Then you you'd have to
watch for these query parameters in subsequent application requests, maybe
by inspecting the Request object in an Application#newRequestCycle()
override.

Hope that helps,
Dan

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Mike Mander wicket-m...@gmx.de wrote:

 Hi,

 i would like to log execution of bookmarkable page links. I know that they
 are only renderered in markup and call the page from the browser.

 Maybe someone has a hint for me here?

 Thanks
 Mike

 --**--**-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Opening Wicket Page in New Browser Tab/Window

2011-08-18 Thread aksarben

Unfortunately, by that point, it's too late. The small HTML form has already
appeared in my app window,  even the map viewer subsequently opens in a new
window, my app content has been destroyed.

Since I posted this topic, I decided to go with PopupSettings. Since my
corporate target audience all has Internet Explorer, I can tell them to
configure the browser to open popups in a new tab. However, this fix means
that in Firefox (which doesn't offer this option) users still get a free
floating popup, even if that's not what they want.

Sounds like the powers that be ought to think about this for Wicket 1.5.
This is such  a standard browser feature it's absence seems (IMHO) like a
serious deficiency in the framework.

--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Opening-Wicket-Page-in-New-Browser-Tab-Window-tp3752465p3753218.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Opening Wicket Page in New Browser Tab/Window

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:03 AM, aksarben rwada...@up.com wrote:

 Unfortunately, by that point, it's too late. The small HTML form has
 already
 appeared in my app window,  even the map viewer subsequently opens in a
 new
 window, my app content has been destroyed.


Is it necessary to replace your app window's contents with the form? Can't
you just put the form in the existing page (using panel swapping) and submit
it with some dom ready JavaScript?

Dan

Cache Wicket Pages rather than Construct New Objects

2011-08-18 Thread eugenebalt

We have several Wicket pages that get constructed and then are available to
the user via hyperlinks. There is no need to re-construct those Wicket pages
because they never change from that point on. They are static info pages.

However, each time the user accesses a page, we construct a new instance,
which decreases memory by 3 MB. We have a profiler running and we see that
each time an existing page is accessed, free memory drops by a few MB.

The link's action is to setResponsePage(MyPage.class), but that creates a
new object. Suppose we were keeping all our Page objects in a Session. Is
there a way to setResponsePage() to an existing Page instance?

--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Cache-Wicket-Pages-rather-than-Construct-New-Objects-tp3753362p3753362.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Cache Wicket Pages rather than Construct New Objects

The problem is elsewhere.
setResponsePage(Class) creates a new instance but this instance is
later reclaimed by the GC.
If you keep any reference to the created Page instance then it will
stay around until this reference is GC-ed.

You can use setResponsePage(Page) method to link to an existing instance.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:58 PM, eugenebalt eugeneb...@yahoo.com wrote:
We have several Wicket pages that get constructed and then are available to
the user via hyperlinks. There is no need to re-construct those Wicket pages
because they never change from that point on. They are static info pages.

However, each time the user accesses a page, we construct a new instance,
which decreases memory by 3 MB. We have a profiler running and we see that
each time an existing page is accessed, free memory drops by a few MB.

The link's action is to setResponsePage(MyPage.class), but that creates a
new object. Suppose we were keeping all our Page objects in a Session. Is
there a way to setResponsePage() to an existing Page instance?

--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Cache-Wicket-Pages-rather-than-Construct-New-Objects-tp3753362p3753362.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Cache Wicket Pages rather than Construct New Objects

2011-08-18 Thread Hans Lesmeister

 The link's action is to setResponsePage(MyPage.class), but that creates a
 new object. Suppose we were keeping all our Page objects in a Session. Is
 there a way to setResponsePage() to an existing Page instance?

You can replace or extend the DefaultPageFactory (IPageFactory)

Regards
Hans



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Cache Wicket Pages rather than Construct New Objects

2011-08-18 Thread Mauro Ciancio

Yes, but AFAIR there could be multithreading issues if you share a page
object among differents threads.
Am I wrong?

Regards.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Hans Lesmeister 
hans.lesmeis...@lessy-software.de wrote:

  The link's action is to setResponsePage(MyPage.class), but that creates a
  new object. Suppose we were keeping all our Page objects in a Session. Is
  there a way to setResponsePage() to an existing Page instance?

 You can replace or extend the DefaultPageFactory (IPageFactory)

 Regards
 Hans



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-- 
Mauro Ciancio
http://about.me/maurociancio

Re: Cache Wicket Pages rather than Construct New Objects

2011-08-18 Thread Sven Meier

Hi,

 each time the user accesses a page, we construct a new instance,
 which decreases memory by 3 MB.

hopefully the memory is reclaimed by the garbage collector afterwards,
isn't it?

Sven


On 08/18/2011 08:58 PM, eugenebalt wrote:
 We have several Wicket pages that get constructed and then are available to
 the user via hyperlinks. There is no need to re-construct those Wicket pages
 because they never change from that point on. They are static info pages.
 
 However, each time the user accesses a page, we construct a new instance,
 which decreases memory by 3 MB. We have a profiler running and we see that
 each time an existing page is accessed, free memory drops by a few MB.
 
 The link's action is to setResponsePage(MyPage.class), but that creates a
 new object. Suppose we were keeping all our Page objects in a Session. Is
 there a way to setResponsePage() to an existing Page instance?
 
 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Cache-Wicket-Pages-rather-than-Construct-New-Objects-tp3753362p3753362.html
 Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Opening Wicket Page in New Browser Tab/Window

2011-08-18 Thread Gregor Kaczor


Some months ago I had the same/similar problem.

You have to add the attribute by overriding onComponentTag(ComponentTag 
tag). As far as I remember you should use the usual 
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Button with it, AjaxButton won't work.


FormVoid form = new FormVoid(ConvertForm) {
@Override
protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
super.onComponentTag(tag);
tag.put(target, _blank);
}
};
--
How to find files on the Internet? FindFiles.net http://findfiles.net!

On 08/18/2011 02:30 PM, aksarben wrote:

How can I make a Wicket page open in a new browser tab/window? I'm not
talking about a popup, but a standard window. I have an app that needs to
open a GIS map viewer in a separate window, based on the user's current
context. The map viewer requires that I submit a form with GPS coordinates,
so I need Wicket to render some simple HTML with the coordinates in hidden
form fields, then submit the form to the map viewer URL as soon as the page
renders. This part is no problem. The problem is that Wicket renders the
HTML in the wrong window.

Currently, I'm using code to generate the link to invoke the map viewer:

*final MenuItem mapMenu = new EnmMenuItem(Map) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

@Override protected AbstractLink newLink(final String componentId) {
final SubmitLink link = new SubmitLink(componentId, form) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override public void onSubmit() {
selectMapMenu();
}
};
link.setDefaultFormProcessing(false);
link.setEnabled(true);
link.setRenderBodyOnly(false);
link.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(target, _blank));

return link;
}
};*

When the menu item is chosen, the following is invoked:

*@Override protected void selectMapMenu() {
for (final TrackSummary summary : grid.getSelectedItems()) {
try {
setResponsePage(new TrackMapRequestPage(summary.getSystemNumber()));
}
catch (final UnauthorizedPageError ex) {
error(ex.getMessage());
}
}
}*

Despite setting the link target to _blank, the TrackMapRequestPage opens
in the SAME window as the application. How can I make it open in a DIFFERENT
window so both windows are visible at the same time? My design specs says
the new window shouldn't be a popup.


--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Opening-Wicket-Page-in-New-Browser-Tab-Window-tp3752465p3752465.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Unexpected RuntimeException when trying a project with a DataTable