Hi, I have a bunch of properties and I want to provide the user a form to
override the properties, but the issue is that some of these properties are
range bound (eg. value can be between 10 and 100), some of them are range
bound on a single side (eg. value can only be greater than 5), and some of
Hi,
listView.setReuseItems(true);
TextFieldInteger tf = new TextFieldInteger(someId, model);
tf.add(RangeValidator.(range|minimum|maximum)(...));
listItem.add(tf);
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:29 AM, madmax108 lifeofna...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have a bunch of properties and I want to provide
Hi!
Is it possible to implement a listview that evaporates on detach and
builds itself again whenever one iterates over its items?
We have a huge page with thuge listview and the
serialization/deserialization of the structure slows down the page.
The models are detachable and maybe the
Hi,
You can use ListView#removeAll() in #detach() but then this ListView should
not have any action components
like Link/Button and any FormComponents in its items, because they won't be
reachable.
It can have pretty much only Labels inside.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Martin Makundi
Is it possible to have the listview rebuild itself upon form
processing to allow formcomponents?
**
Martin
2013/5/28 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org:
Hi,
You can use ListView#removeAll() in #detach() but then this ListView should
not have any action components
like Link/Button and any
Martin,
You could use something that builds itself at client side... while at
server side is still very lightweight.
Something like
http://www.antiliasoft.com/wicket-angular-demo/filtering
See for explanation.
http://www.antiliasoft.com/wicket-angular-demo/
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:01 AM,
Hi,
I'm looking for protection against CSRF and found and old issue for Apache
Wicket 1.3.4.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1782
And as far as have understood the Apache Wicket does not support
Synchronizer Token Pattern, as suggested at
You could use something that builds itself at client side... while at
server side is still very lightweight.
Something like
http://www.antiliasoft.com/wicket-angular-demo/filtering
See for explanation.
http://www.antiliasoft.com/wicket-angular-demo/
This is mainly read-only? We would
Ah... cool! :)
Will try this and let you know!
The code u sent is very similar to what I have, and just reminded me of a
way I can get this done
Thanks again... will get back with the results :)
--
View this message in context:
In wicketstuff-jasperreports the dependency to jasper is
dependency
groupIdjasperreports/groupId
artifactIdjasperreports/artifactId
/dependency
That leads to version 3.5.3
I found
You can try to do this in
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form#process(IFormSubmitter) {
rebuild();
super.process(formSubmitter);
}
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Is it possible to have the listview rebuild itself upon form
Hi Dieter,
No one worked on this integration lately.
You can form wicketstuff/core project and send a pull request with the
upgrade.
Thanks!
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Dieter Tremel
tre...@tremel-computer.dewrote:
In wicketstuff-jasperreports the dependency to jasper is
You could not use normal form processing, I guess, as there will not be any
form components at server side... (they will be removed after list is
displayed). So, you will have to do some ticks to map cliente state with
server state.
The examples above could be make to work for non read-only
Hi,
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Magnus K Karlsson
magnus.r.karls...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for protection against CSRF and found and old issue for Apache
Wicket 1.3.4.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1782
And as far as have understood the Apache Wicket does
You could not use normal form processing, I guess, as there will not be any
form components at server side... (they will be removed after list is
displayed). So, you will have to do some ticks to map cliente state with
server state.
The examples above could be make to work for non read-only
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
You could not use normal form processing, I guess, as there will not be
any
form components at server side... (they will be removed after list is
displayed). So, you will have to do some ticks to
Hi,
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
You could not use normal form processing, I guess, as there will not be
any
form components at server side...
2013/5/28 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
You could not use normal form processing, I guess, as there will not be
any
form components at server side... (they will be removed after list is
Hi Ernesto,
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
You
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
2013/5/28 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
You could not use normal form processing, I guess, as
Hi!
@Martin,
Sometimes when wheels at hand are not good enough for a certain terrain you
should ask yourself if it it not easier to invent a new one.
Only shortsightedness might get one convinced that writing new code is
easier than levaraging legacy..eventually ;) [1]
[1]
Hi Martin,
Martin Makundi wants to rebuild the ListView items when the form is
submitted.
I.e. the form components will be created and then the form processing will
proceed.
Yes, I understand that. But my point would match the info coming from
client with new component tree being created?
I look at the code in master branch (7.x) and I guess you still use 1.4.x.
In 7.x Form#process() is the first non-final method where you can plug your
code.
I doubt that 1.4 is different in this area but you can check yourself.
Start from Form#onFormSubmitted() and follow the flow.
Thanks,
Thanks for your fast reply!
I have tested CryptoMapper, but as far as I can see the CryptoMapper does
not return unique URL for each session, as suggested by OWASP
The synchronizer token pattern requires the generating of random
challenge tokens that are associated with the user's current
Martin Makundi wants to rebuild the ListView items when the form is
submitted.
I.e. the form components will be created and then the form processing will
proceed.
Yes, I understand that. But my point would match the info coming from
client with new component tree being created? i.e. will
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Martin,
Martin Makundi wants to rebuild the ListView items when the form is
submitted.
I.e. the form components will be created and then the form processing
will
proceed.
Yes, I understand
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Magnus K Karlsson
magnus.r.karls...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your fast reply!
I have tested CryptoMapper, but as far as I can see the CryptoMapper does
not return unique URL for each session, as suggested by OWASP
The session id is used to
Hi Martin,
I've made further investigations and found the problem, it was an order of
'mounting pages' and 'setRootRequestMapper'.
If mounting goes first everything works fine (the URL to Loging generated
with HTTPS), but if I change the order the URL is generated for HTTP and
there is no
Ajax update might be tricky, it uses component ids.
2013/5/28 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Martin,
Martin Makundi wants to rebuild the ListView items when the form is
submitted.
I.e. the
Hi Alexey,
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Alexey Mukas alexey.mu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Martin,
I've made further investigations and found the problem, it was an order of
'mounting pages' and 'setRootRequestMapper'.
If mounting goes first everything works fine (the URL to Loging
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Ajax update might be tricky, it uses component ids.
True.
You can override FormComponent#getInputName() to make them stable...
2013/5/28 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org:
On Tue, May 28, 2013
That's quite critical for form component input processing too..
2013/5/28 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Ajax update might be tricky, it uses component ids.
True.
You can override
h ok !
thank you
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Best-way-to-choose-different-render-tp4658976p4659101.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
Thanks Martin
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-create-https-link-to-a-page-tp4659050p4659102.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
Hi,
Your app fails to start due to:
WARN - AbstractLifeCycle - FAILED
org.eclipse.jetty.security.ConstraintSecurityHandler@70e434d:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: No LoginService for
org.eclipse.jetty.security.authentication.FormAuthenticator@c163956 in
i might have solved the problem the default ICryptFactory is
/**
* Default crypt factory. This factory will instantiate a {@link
SunJceCrypt} once and cache it for
* all further invocations of {@link #newCrypt()}.
*
* @author Igor Vaynberg (ivaynberg)
*/
public class
Hello folks,
I have rendered all of my pre-login wicket pages fully stateless. I have
just noticed that while no wicket sessions are created until a valid login
occurs using most browsers, when accessing the site via Google Chrome, the
wicket session is bound after the initial rendering. As for
Hi Martin,
yeah you're right, the onclick solution still works for non-Ajax links. This
should be mentionend in the wiki too, i was irritated about the earlier wicket
versions paragraph.
But the onclick solution with a Behavior (or AttributeModifier) is not working
for our Ajax Components
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Marcel Hoerr marcel.ho...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Martin,
yeah you're right, the onclick solution still works for non-Ajax links.
This should be mentionend in the wiki too, i was irritated about the
earlier wicket versions paragraph.
The WIKI is editable by
Have you checked if Chrome is prefetching other pages (which may be
stateful)?
Met vriendelijke groet,
Kind regards,
Bas Gooren
Op 28-5-2013 12:14, schreef ChambreNoire:
Hello folks,
I have rendered all of my pre-login wicket pages fully stateless. I have
just noticed that while no wicket
How would I check this? I disabled Predict network actions to improve page
load performance but that hasn't changed anything.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Session-creation-with-stateless-pages-in-Chrome-tp4659106p4659111.html
Sent from the
The solution to generate unique URL for each session is to change the
default ICryptFactory to KeyInSessionSunJceCryptFactory.
getSecuritySettings().setCryptFactory(new
KeyInSessionSunJceCryptFactory());
setRootRequestMapper(new CryptoMapper(getRootRequestMapper(),
this));
Hi!
I'm successfully testing CryptoMapper in Apache Wicket 6 with unique URL
for each Session. But I'm also depending on to be able to define security
constaint in the web.xml.
security-constraint
web-resource-collection
web-resource-nameexample-wicket/web-resource-name
Hi Magnus,
At the moment this doesn't seem to be very easy because #encryptUrl() and
#decryptUrl() methods are private..
If they were protected then it would be quite easy to extend the class and
provide your own #mapHandler() / #mapRequest() methods which decide
themselves what to
Simply by having a look at your tomcat (or reverse proxy) access log?
Of course this is only needed if the page you are hitting has links to
other, stateful pages.
You can also set a breakpoint in Session.bind() to see when it's called.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Kind regards,
Bas Gooren
Op
Hi,
we had similar issue and could not find jira ticket for this, thus created
WICKET-5210 with quickstart.
Our workaround was changing our jQuery('#someid').. to jQuery('[id=someid]')..
to match all same (two) ids.
Rgds,
Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Nico
Am 28.05.2013 09:39, schrieb Martin Grigorov:
You can form wicketstuff/core project and send a pull request with the
upgrade.
Well, I've made it. With a little luck and lot of horses.
;-) (Silly slogan from a Marlboro cigarette commercial in germany from
about 1990)
I also saw this behavior using 6.8.0
The component with additional id was replaced, but there was time period
when 2 components are present on page
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Heikki Uotinen
heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com wrote:
Hi,
we had similar issue and could not find jira ticket
Merged!
Danke!
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Dieter Tremel tre...@tremel-computer.dewrote:
Am 28.05.2013 09:39, schrieb Martin Grigorov:
You can form wicketstuff/core project and send a pull request with the
upgrade.
Well, I've made it. With a little luck and lot of horses.
;-)
Hi, I think I've reported this before but no one else seems to be able to
reproduce it. In my app, I was seeing that the value from a field was always
null after doing a submit. I went back to the Ajax submit form example that
comes with Wicket 6.6 to see if I could reproduce it. I think the
50 matches
Mail list logo
