Hi,
The only problem I see is in your scenario.
Why do you check the value in #getName() ?
This method is called via reflection by CompoundPropertyModel before the
model updates (form processing).
You should expect the new value in AjaxButton#onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget,
Form).
On Wed, May 29, 20
That's the problem. Session.bind() isn't called. I put a breakpoin in
AbstractHttpSessionStore.bind() but still it's hard to tell what's causing
this to be called...
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Session-creation-with-stateless-pages-in-Chrome-tp465
Hi, I think I've reported this before but no one else seems to be able to
reproduce it. In my app, I was seeing that the value from a field was always
null after doing a submit. I went back to the Ajax submit form example that
comes with Wicket 6.6 to see if I could reproduce it. I think the proble
Merged!
Danke!
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Dieter Tremel wrote:
> Am 28.05.2013 09:39, schrieb Martin Grigorov:
> > You can form wicketstuff/core project and send a pull request with the
> > upgrade.
>
> Well, I've made it. With a little luck and lot of horses.
> ;-) (Silly slogan from a Ma
I also saw this behavior using 6.8.0
The component with additional id was replaced, but there was time period
when 2 components are present on page
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Heikki Uotinen <
heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we had similar issue and could not find jira tic
Am 28.05.2013 09:39, schrieb Martin Grigorov:
> You can form wicketstuff/core project and send a pull request with the
> upgrade.
Well, I've made it. With a little luck and lot of horses.
;-) (Silly slogan from a Marlboro cigarette commercial in germany from
about 1990)
https://github.com/wickets
Hi,
we had similar issue and could not find jira ticket for this, thus created
WICKET-5210 with quickstart.
Our workaround was changing our jQuery('#someid').. to jQuery('[id=someid]')..
to match all same (two) ids.
Rgds,
Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Nico [mailto:nico.kan...@gmx.de
Simply by having a look at your tomcat (or reverse proxy) access log?
Of course this is only needed if the page you are hitting has links to
other, stateful pages.
You can also set a breakpoint in Session.bind() to see when it's called.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Kind regards,
Bas Gooren
Op 28-
Hi Magnus,
At the moment this doesn't seem to be very easy because #encryptUrl() and
#decryptUrl() methods are private..
If they were protected then it would be quite easy to extend the class and
provide your own #mapHandler() / #mapRequest() methods which decide
themselves what to encrypt/decrypt
Hi!
I'm successfully testing CryptoMapper in Apache Wicket 6 with unique URL
for each Session. But I'm also depending on to be able to define security
constaint in the web.xml.
example-wicket
/user/*
These are the roles who have
The solution to generate unique URL for each session is to change the
default ICryptFactory to KeyInSessionSunJceCryptFactory.
getSecuritySettings().setCryptFactory(new
KeyInSessionSunJceCryptFactory());
setRootRequestMapper(new CryptoMapper(getRootRequestMapper(),
this));
2013/
How would I check this? I disabled "Predict network actions to improve page
load performance" but that hasn't changed anything.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Session-creation-with-stateless-pages-in-Chrome-tp4659106p4659111.html
Sent from th
Have you checked if Chrome is prefetching other pages (which may be
stateful)?
Met vriendelijke groet,
Kind regards,
Bas Gooren
Op 28-5-2013 12:14, schreef ChambreNoire:
Hello folks,
I have rendered all of my pre-login wicket pages fully stateless. I have
just noticed that while no wicket se
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Marcel Hoerr wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> yeah you're right, the onclick solution still works for non-Ajax links.
> This should be mentionend in the wiki too, i was irritated about the
> "earlier wicket versions" paragraph.
>
The WIKI is editable by everyone.
Please i
Hi Martin,
yeah you're right, the onclick solution still works for non-Ajax links. This
should be mentionend in the wiki too, i was irritated about the "earlier wicket
versions" paragraph.
But the onclick solution with a Behavior (or AttributeModifier) is not working
for our Ajax Components any
Hello folks,
I have rendered all of my pre-login wicket pages fully stateless. I have
just noticed that while no wicket sessions are created until a valid login
occurs using most browsers, when accessing the site via Google Chrome, the
wicket session is bound after the initial rendering. As for va
i might have solved the problem the default ICryptFactory is
/**
* Default crypt factory. This factory will instantiate a {@link
SunJceCrypt} once and cache it for
* all further invocations of {@link #newCrypt()}.
*
* @author Igor Vaynberg (ivaynberg)
*/
public class CachingSunJceCryptFactory
Hi,
Your app fails to start due to:
WARN - AbstractLifeCycle - FAILED
org.eclipse.jetty.security.ConstraintSecurityHandler@70e434d:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: No LoginService for
org.eclipse.jetty.security.authentication.FormAuthenticator@c163956 in
org.eclipse.jetty.security.Const
Thanks Martin
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-create-https-link-to-a-page-tp4659050p4659102.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe
h ok !
thank you
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Best-way-to-choose-different-render-tp4658976p4659101.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To un
That's quite critical for form component input processing too..
2013/5/28 Martin Grigorov :
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Martin Makundi <
> martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>
>> Ajax update might be tricky, it uses component ids.
>>
>
> True.
> You can override FormComponent#getIn
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Martin Makundi <
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> Ajax update might be tricky, it uses component ids.
>
True.
You can override FormComponent#getInputName() to make them stable...
>
> 2013/5/28 Martin Grigorov :
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM,
Hi Alexey,
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Alexey Mukas wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I've made further investigations and found the problem, it was an order of
> 'mounting pages' and 'setRootRequestMapper'.
>
> If mounting goes first everything works fine (the URL to Loging generated
> with HTTPS),
Ajax update might be tricky, it uses component ids.
2013/5/28 Martin Grigorov :
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> Martin Makundi wants to rebuild the ListView items when the form is
>> > submitted.
>> > I.e. the form
Hi Martin,
I've made further investigations and found the problem, it was an order of
'mounting pages' and 'setRootRequestMapper'.
If mounting goes first everything works fine (the URL to Loging generated
with HTTPS), but if I change the order the URL is generated for HTTP and
there is no redirec
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Magnus K Karlsson <
magnus.r.karls...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your fast reply!
>
> I have tested CryptoMapper, but as far as I can see the CryptoMapper does
> not return unique URL for each session, as suggested by OWASP
>
The session id is used to encrypt
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Martin Makundi wants to rebuild the ListView items when the form is
> > submitted.
> > I.e. the form components will be created and then the form processing
> will
> > proceed.
> >
> > Yes, I
> Martin Makundi wants to rebuild the ListView items when the form is
>> submitted.
>> I.e. the form components will be created and then the form processing will
>> proceed.
>>
>> Yes, I understand that. But my point would match the info coming from
> client with new component tree being created?
Thanks for your fast reply!
I have tested CryptoMapper, but as far as I can see the CryptoMapper does
not return unique URL for each session, as suggested by OWASP
"The synchronizer token pattern requires the generating of random
"challenge" tokens that are associated with the user's current sess
> I look at the code in master branch (7.x) and I guess you still use 1.4.x.
> In 7.x Form#process() is the first non-final method where you can plug your
> code.
> I doubt that 1.4 is different in this area but you can check yourself.
> Start from Form#onFormSubmitted() and follow the flow.
Thank
Hi Martin,
Martin Makundi wants to rebuild the ListView items when the form is
> submitted.
> I.e. the form components will be created and then the form processing will
> proceed.
>
> Yes, I understand that. But my point would match the info coming from
client with new component tree being created
Hi!
> @Martin,
>
> Sometimes when wheels at hand are not good enough for a certain terrain you
> should ask yourself if it it not easier to invent a new one.
Only shortsightedness might get one convinced that writing new code is
easier than levaraging legacy..eventually ;) [1]
[1]
http://www.a
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Martin Makundi <
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> 2013/5/28 Martin Grigorov :
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Martin Makundi <
> > martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> >
> >> > You could not use normal form processing, I guess, as there w
Hi Ernesto,
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Martin Grigorov >wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Martin Makundi <
> > martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > You coul
2013/5/28 Martin Grigorov :
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Martin Makundi <
> martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>
>> > You could not use normal form processing, I guess, as there will not be
>> any
>> > form components at server side... (they will be removed after list is
>> > display
Hi,
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Martin Makundi <
> martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>
> > > You could not use normal form processing, I guess, as there will not be
> > any
> > > form components at server side... (they wil
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Martin Makundi <
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> > You could not use normal form processing, I guess, as there will not be
> any
> > form components at server side... (they will be removed after list is
> > displayed). So, you will have to do some tic
Hi,
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Magnus K Karlsson <
magnus.r.karls...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for protection against CSRF and found and old issue for Apache
> Wicket 1.3.4.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1782
>
> And as far as have understood the Apache Wi
> You could not use normal form processing, I guess, as there will not be any
> form components at server side... (they will be removed after list is
> displayed). So, you will have to do some ticks to map cliente state with
> server state.
>
> The examples above could be make to work for non read-
You could not use normal form processing, I guess, as there will not be any
form components at server side... (they will be removed after list is
displayed). So, you will have to do some ticks to map cliente state with
server state.
The examples above could be make to work for non read-only situat
Hi Dieter,
No one worked on this integration lately.
You can form wicketstuff/core project and send a pull request with the
upgrade.
Thanks!
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Dieter Tremel
wrote:
> In wicketstuff-jasperreports the dependency to jasper is
> >
> >
You can try to do this in
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form#process(IFormSubmitter) {
rebuild();
super.process(formSubmitter);
}
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Martin Makundi <
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> Is it possible to have the listview rebuild itself upon form
Ah... cool! :)
Will try this and let you know!
The code u sent is very similar to what I have, and just reminded me of a
way I can get this done
Thanks again... will get back with the results :)
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Validating-a-PropertyL
In wicketstuff-jasperreports the dependency to jasper is
>
> jasperreports
> jasperreports
>
That leads to version 3.5.3
I found
http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/net.sf.jasperreports/jasperreports/5.1.0,
so the newer versi
> You could use something that builds itself at client side... while at
> server side is still very lightweight.
> Something like
>
> http://www.antiliasoft.com/wicket-angular-demo/filtering
>
> See for explanation.
>
> http://www.antiliasoft.com/wicket-angular-demo/
This is mainly read-only? We w
Hi,
I'm looking for protection against CSRF and found and old issue for Apache
Wicket 1.3.4.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1782
And as far as have understood the Apache Wicket does not support
Synchronizer Token Pattern, as suggested at
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Cross-Site_
Martin,
You could use something that builds itself at client side... while at
server side is still very lightweight.
Something like
http://www.antiliasoft.com/wicket-angular-demo/filtering
See for explanation.
http://www.antiliasoft.com/wicket-angular-demo/
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:01 AM, M
Is it possible to have the listview rebuild itself upon form
processing to allow formcomponents?
**
Martin
2013/5/28 Martin Grigorov :
> Hi,
>
> You can use ListView#removeAll() in #detach() but then this ListView should
> not have any action components
> like Link/Button and any FormComponents i
Hi,
You can use ListView#removeAll() in #detach() but then this ListView should
not have any action components
like Link/Button and any FormComponents in its items, because they won't be
reachable.
It can have pretty much only Labels inside.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Martin Makundi <
mar
Hi!
Is it possible to implement a listview that evaporates on detach and
builds itself again whenever one iterates over its items?
We have a huge page with thuge listview and the
serialization/deserialization of the structure slows down the page.
The models are detachable and maybe the component
50 matches
Mail list logo
