Re: Requirements for a progress bar in a file upload form
Hi, On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:21 AM, MartinoSuperman martinosuper...@live.nlwrote: Hi, I built a form in Wicket, in which a file can be uploaded to the server. Furthermore, to show the progress of uploading I also built in a progress bar. The problem now is that that progress bar does not work. I do not know what I forgot to implement and/or what I did. I think I forgot something. May we ask what you have implemented ? :-) My question is: What are the requirements for the working of a progress bar in a form for uploading a file? Thanks for your help in advance! -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Requirements-for-a-progress-bar-in-a-file-upload-form-tp4661935.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: CSS include order
Hi, 1) You can use FilteredHeaderItem to group the site-wide CSS in the beginning of the body, for example. 2) You can use PriorityHeaderItem to put component ones at the top 3) You can use custom header item comparator to re-order them on your custom criteria See http://wicketinaction.com/2012/07/wicket-6-resource-management/ for explanation of all of those approaches. On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Nick Pratt nbpr...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a quick/simple way to ensure that our site-wide CSS is included last (as included in our BasePage.html head section), after all other Components have contributed their CSS files? N
Re: CSS include order
Thanks Martin.
I figured out a slightly simpler approach (which I think works, please
correct me if Im mistaken) - I added the site-wide CSS to my BasePage in
Java rather than a simple include ref in the markup :
@Override
public void renderHead( IHeaderResponse response )
{
super.renderHead( response );
response.render( CssReferenceHeaderItem.forUrl( assets/css/global.css )
);
}
This results in the global.css being appended last in the head and thus
allows us to override anything provided by any Component or Behavior used
on the Page.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi,
1) You can use FilteredHeaderItem to group the site-wide CSS in the
beginning of the body, for example.
2) You can use PriorityHeaderItem to put component ones at the top
3) You can use custom header item comparator to re-order them on your
custom criteria
See http://wicketinaction.com/2012/07/wicket-6-resource-management/ for
explanation of all of those approaches.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Nick Pratt nbpr...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a quick/simple way to ensure that our site-wide CSS is included
last (as included in our BasePage.html head section), after all other
Components have contributed their CSS files?
N
Re: CSS include order
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Nick Pratt nbpr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Martin.
I figured out a slightly simpler approach (which I think works, please
correct me if Im mistaken) - I added the site-wide CSS to my BasePage in
Java rather than a simple include ref in the markup :
@Override
public void renderHead( IHeaderResponse response )
{
super.renderHead( response );
response.render( CssReferenceHeaderItem.forUrl( assets/css/global.css )
Use CssHeaderItem instead.
The behavior is the same, just the semantic is more clear.
);
}
This results in the global.css being appended last in the head and thus
allows us to override anything provided by any Component or Behavior used
on the Page.
Yes. This is yet another way to do it.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
1) You can use FilteredHeaderItem to group the site-wide CSS in the
beginning of the body, for example.
2) You can use PriorityHeaderItem to put component ones at the top
3) You can use custom header item comparator to re-order them on your
custom criteria
See http://wicketinaction.com/2012/07/wicket-6-resource-management/ for
explanation of all of those approaches.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Nick Pratt nbpr...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a quick/simple way to ensure that our site-wide CSS is
included
last (as included in our BasePage.html head section), after all other
Components have contributed their CSS files?
N
AW: Loading content of IFrames only when displayed
Now why didn't I think oft hat. Thank you Martin. Maybe we can remove the final declaration in the next release (if there is no objections) Cheers, Christian -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Gesendet: Montag, 21. Oktober 2013 10:18 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: Loading content of IFrames only when displayed Hi, You can use custom Behavior that removes the 'url' attribute in its #onComponentTag() and adds 'data-url' instead. Component#onComponentTag() is executed before Behavior#onComponentTag() so it should work OK. On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Christian Schröter christian.schroe...@1und1.de wrote: Hello, I'm using the InlineFrame class to display an IFrame. Now the IFrame is added in a dialog prompt, which is not visible by default. The user has to click a certain link to see the IFrame in the dialog prompt. Unfortunately the browser loads the URL defined in the source attribute, no matter if the IFrame is visible or not. In my opinion, it would be better to load the content only if the iframe is visible. A solution to achieve this goal is explained here: http://stackoverflow.com/**questions/13437091/is-it-** possible-to-not-load-an-**iframe-in-a-hidden-div-until-** the-div-is-displayedhttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/13437091/is-it -possible-to-not-load-an-iframe-in-a-hidden-div-until-the-div-is-displ ayed But for some reason the onComponentTag(ComonentTag tag) is declared final in the InlineFrame class. I don't understand why the method is final and I'm a bit clueless how to proceed. Hopefully someone can help me. Thanks, Christian
Re: Loading content of IFrames only when displayed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5393 Done On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Christian Schröter christian.schroe...@1und1.de wrote: Now why didn't I think oft hat. Thank you Martin. Maybe we can remove the final declaration in the next release (if there is no objections) Cheers, Christian -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Gesendet: Montag, 21. Oktober 2013 10:18 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: Loading content of IFrames only when displayed Hi, You can use custom Behavior that removes the 'url' attribute in its #onComponentTag() and adds 'data-url' instead. Component#onComponentTag() is executed before Behavior#onComponentTag() so it should work OK. On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Christian Schröter christian.schroe...@1und1.de wrote: Hello, I'm using the InlineFrame class to display an IFrame. Now the IFrame is added in a dialog prompt, which is not visible by default. The user has to click a certain link to see the IFrame in the dialog prompt. Unfortunately the browser loads the URL defined in the source attribute, no matter if the IFrame is visible or not. In my opinion, it would be better to load the content only if the iframe is visible. A solution to achieve this goal is explained here: http://stackoverflow.com/**questions/13437091/is-it-** possible-to-not-load-an-**iframe-in-a-hidden-div-until-** the-div-is-displayedhttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/13437091/is-it -possible-to-not-load-an-iframe-in-a-hidden-div-until-the-div-is-displ ayed But for some reason the onComponentTag(ComonentTag tag) is declared final in the InlineFrame class. I don't understand why the method is final and I'm a bit clueless how to proceed. Hopefully someone can help me. Thanks, Christian
Add or remove a row in RefreshingView with Ajax
Hi, I have a RefreshingView, which consists of TextFields, Labels and a DownloadLink. When a button is pressed, a new row should be added with the help of Ajax. Unfortunately, this does not work. Can somebody tell me what I have to program to make adding and removing rows in RefreshingView possible? Thanks in advance! -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Add-or-remove-a-row-in-RefreshingView-with-Ajax-tp4661944.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: unwanted DefaultPageManagerProvider
On 22.10.2013 10:22, Sven Meier wrote:
Hi Sven,
currently there's no way to change the PageManager once it's fetched in
Application#internalGetPageManager().
agreed.
Do you have a stacktrace for the code triggering
Application.getPageManagerProvider().get() ? Besides devutils I don't
see any call to this from Wicket.
it is the sessionUnbound method that supposedly was triggered by the
container doing its clustering while wicket still initializes;
Application:478
public void sessionUnbound(final String sessionId){
internalGetPageManager().sessionExpired(sessionId);
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
}
cu uwe
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Add or remove a row in RefreshingView with Ajax
Hi there, Not sure what you mean by 'does not work'... so guessing the issue, and the solution. Are you updating the whole RepeatingView? If so, you need to wrap the repeater in a WebMarkupContainer and refresh that (remembering to setOutputMarkupId to true etc.) I don't know the reason why, but repeaters have to be updated via their parent container. Cheers, Col. -Original Message- From: MartinoSuperman [mailto:martinosuper...@live.nl] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 3:36 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Add or remove a row in RefreshingView with Ajax Hi, I have a RefreshingView, which consists of TextFields, Labels and a DownloadLink. When a button is pressed, a new row should be added with the help of Ajax. Unfortunately, this does not work. Can somebody tell me what I have to program to make adding and removing rows in RefreshingView possible? Thanks in advance! -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Add-or-remove-a-row-in-RefreshingView-with-Ajax-tp4661944.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org EMAIL DISCLAIMER This email message and its attachments are confidential and may also contain copyright or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not forward the email or disclose or use the information contained in it. If you have received this email message in error, please advise the sender immediately by replying to this email and delete the message and any associated attachments. Any views, opinions, conclusions, advice or statements expressed in this email message are those of the individual sender and should not be relied upon as the considered view, opinion, conclusions, advice or statement of this company except where the sender expressly, and with authority, states them to be the considered view, opinion, conclusions, advice or statement of this company. Every care is taken but we recommend that you scan any attachments for viruses. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AbstractColumn get row object
Thanks for relies. I saved the reference in newCellItem. Cheers. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AbstractColumn-get-row-object-tp4661924p4661939.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How Does Checkbox Know To Store To My Data Object
Read section 10.2 Models and JavaBeans of the Wicket Guide at: http://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/chapter10.html#chapter10_2 From the code snipet you posted I take it your form or parent of your form has a CompondPropertyModel which must be feeding your checkbox. Either that, or you have a model tight to your checkbox. - ~ Thank you, p...@bors.ws -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-Does-Checkbox-Know-To-Store-To-My-Data-Object-tp4661879p4661947.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket-bootstrap NoSuchMethodError: Url.parse
Must be your maven build and how it pulls that wicket-request artifact into your project. I suggest you exclude it in your dependency declaration for the bootstrap version you use in your POM. Have a great day, Paul Bors On Oct 22, 2013, at 10:36 AM, meduolis meduol...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Martin, As we can see wicket-request.jar is different version then other wicket modules. So, I have downloaded wicket-request.jar of 6.11.0 version manually and replaced it in application AND IT WORKED :). So, I really do not know, why bootstrap download wrong version. Maybe I need to exclude wicket-request from bootstrap and add dependency of proper version myself? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-bootstrap-NoSuchMethodError-Url-parse-tp4661909p4661923.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AW: set session-timeout
Right, you would have to do it on the Log In page during authentication as
Martijn suggested.
We have a global Settings page where we let admins configure this duration in
minutes and we enable it via our Log In page.
To do it for unauthorized users it won't really make sense. Why would you let
them waste your servers resources and keep your servers busy longer than the
web.xml descriptor already is configured for? What would be such a real
use-case?
Have a great day,
Paul Bors
On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:41 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK you can specify the session timeout in your web.xml or in your
container. I don't see why Wicket should get involved in that, other
than change the session timeout for logged in users (i.e. after they
successfully authenticated with your application), or special users
(administrators with limited session time, etc). In those cases you
already have a bound session, and you can use the previous call. If
you want to specify session timeout for all users, then do it in your
deployment descriptor.
Christoph's first message says: Now I want to make the time until the
application expires *configurable*
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15382895/session-timeout-in-web-xml
Martijn
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Joachim Schrod jsch...@acm.org wrote:
On 10/22/13 15:32, Martin Grigorov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Joachim Schrod jsch...@acm.org
wrote:
On 10/22/13 10:34, christoph.ma...@t-systems.com wrote:
If I do this in my WicketApplication class, in the init()
method I get java.lang.reflect.UndeclaredThrowableException.
But if I add this to my base page it works. Is there any
possibility to do this in the WicketApplication class?
You have to redefine WebApplication#newSession().
It can't be done in init(), as no session exists yet. And you must
set the Session timeout for each new session anew.
Without having tried it, code like
@Override
public Session newSession(Request request, Response response) {
Session session = super.newSession(request, response);
((ServletWebRequest)request).getContainerRequest().getSession().setMaxInactiveInterval(TIMEOUT);
ALARM!
getSession() is the same as getSession(true). I.e. it will create a
new
http session for each and every http request, even for static
resources.
Wicket creates Wicket Session when Session.get() is used, but creates
Http
Session only when wicketSession.bind() is called.
Interesting to hear; I'd have thought that works. Tricky thing,
that. As I wrote, I didn't try the code; I just copied the access
to HttpSession from the posts below.
But, since wicketSession.bind() is final, one cannot subclass
Session and redefine it either, to set the timeout there. (Much too
many methods of Wicket classes are final, without really good
reason; I copy them to my applications making the methods non-final
much too often. :-( )
If you override bind() and do something wrong then the functionality will
break completely.
Martin, what would you propose to be the hook that allows to
establish a different session timeout application-wide within your
Java application? I hadn't had yet that case, web.xml suffices by
now, but it would be good to know for the future.
It is much better from framework point of view to give you a hook:
org.apache.wicket.session.ISessionStore#getBindListeners().add(myListener)
Cheers,
Joachim
return session;
}
should work. Maybe check that request is really a
ServletWebRequest. (This is also a good place to set the locale.)
HTH,
Joachim
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: francois meillet [mailto:francois.meil...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 21. Oktober 2013 16:34
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: set session-timeout
HttpSession httpSession = ((ServletWebRequest)
RequestCycle.get().getRequest()).getContainerRequest().getSession();
httpSession.setMaxInactiveInterval(timeOut);
François
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Martin Grigorov
mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17802_01/webservices/webservices/docs/1.6/a
pi/javax/servlet/http/HttpSession.html#setMaxInactiveInterval(int)
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:44 PM, christoph.ma...@t-systems.com
wrote:
Hello,
in my application i have set the errorpage for expired pages
like
this:
getApplicationSettings().setPageExpiredErrorPage(Timeout.class);
Now I want to make the time until the application expires
configurable.
How can I do this? Can I set this in the
WicketApplication.init()?
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Joachim Schrod, Roedermark, Germany
Email: jsch...@acm.org
