Hi, There is nothing specific for this. But you can use various org.apache.wicket.util.tester.WicketTester#executeTest() methods to check the response against a valid response pre-saved in a file. Or you can use org.apache.wicket.util.tester.WicketTester#assertContains() to check that a specific
Both solutions are not ideal, since we do not want our tests to become brittle. We want to functionally test components in multiple variants, but where the variants vary in mere layout (css classes), we do not want to have tests break just because the layout changes (as long as the component still
Hm, thinking some more, the general solution would be to fail if a variant is requested, and it is among a set of whitelisted variants, and the markup is not found. For other variants, using the default would probably be fine. This is more general than our current usecase, but still significant I
Hi everyone, I have a problem with AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior on receiving POST request sent by client side. Target on respond method does not seem to work - it process post request but target.add(component) does not refresh a component in parameter. What I'm trying to do is process post
Hi, You should use Wicket.Ajax.post() instead of jQuery.ajax() to make Ajax call. Otherwise Wicket won't be able to calculate the baseUrl and all urls created in this request cycle would be wrong. Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Mon, Sep 8, 2014
Hi, all. I'm traveling at the moment, but I plan to be back in San Francisco around the start of JavaOne. Do any Wicket users plan on being in town for the conference? Would you like me to organize a meet-and-greet at a local restaurant or even (depending on the number of guests) at my place?
After 3 days Wicket 6.17.0 is still not available from Maven Central: http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-core%22 Please check. Ironically (but good) Wicketstuff 6.17.0 is already available in Maven Central. Hendy -- View this message