Sometimes I'm get this exception:
org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupNotFoundException: Markup not found.
Component class: uz.shumbola.signin.SSLSignIn
Enable debug messages for org.apache.wicket.util.resource to get a list of
all filenames tried
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupCache.getMarkupStrea
wont be a problem, i do it all the time
-igor
On 7/31/07, David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm wondering: can 2 pages share a model? Or would this cause
> serialization problems?
>
> Background: I'm trying to set up a wizard-like series of pages, and it
> would make some sense
I'm wondering: can 2 pages share a model? Or would this cause
serialization problems?
Background: I'm trying to set up a wizard-like series of pages, and it
would make some sense for the pages to share the same model, with each
page filling in a piece of it.
(Yes, I know about the Wizard
I've made a bit of progress on this. I actually created a new
TinyMCEBehavior that does away with the TinyMCESettings because that didn't
give me the control I needed in setting up the editor. It's not working
100% yet, but if I can get it working in both browsers reliably, I'll post
what I've do
i believe this is a known issue and the author of contrib project was
working on it. but that was a long time ago.
-igor
On 7/31/07, Erik Dreyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm experiencing issues trying to get the TinyMCEBehavior (from:
> wicket-contrib-tinymce) it works just fine whe
Hi,
I'm experiencing issues trying to get the TinyMCEBehavior (from:
wicket-contrib-tinymce) it works just fine when loaded via a normal HTTP
request, but not when it exists on a panel that is loaded asynchronously via
ajax. Has anyone else experienced this? I'm simply trying to follow the
simpl
Hi,
On 7/31/07, Crash_neo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if this is possible. It sounds a bit strange to me.
>
> But if you want the homepage to use the same bean class and dao every time
> the website is visited the first time, why not make that the default
> constructor?
I'm giving
I'm not sure if this is possible. It sounds a bit strange to me.
But if you want the homepage to use the same bean class and dao every time
the website is visited the first time, why not make that the default
constructor? And if you want to be able to use the same page with a
diferrent bean/dao s
Doh!
Now that you mention that, the solution is obvious and I (once again) feel
stupid for even asking the question (not to mention wasting time on
this)...
I'll fix this when I get back to work tomorrow.
Thank you!
> On 7/31/07, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Bookmarka
Hi,
In my application I'd like to add a home page that displays a
collection of beans from a dao, I'd like to pass the bean class and
the DAO instance as constructor's parameters. it possible to define a
page with parameters in the constructor as the home page?.
thanks in advance,
edgar
On 7/31/07, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> BookmarkablePageLink changeToEnglishLink =
> new BookmarkablePageLink( "eng", getPage().getClass() );
> add( changeToEnglishLink );
> changeToEnglishLink.setVisible( !isLocaleEnglish() );
>
> BookmarkablePageLink changeToJapan
>"missing ( before formal parameters"
>
>at the function declaration function initasset.installDate1DpJs() {
i suspect that asset.installDate is the wicket:id of the component, right?
eelco, since this can be considered a frequent usecase (especially combined
with a CompoundPropertyModel), we sho
interface menuitem {
IModel getLabel(); // can be null
void onClick(); // onclick handler
}
list items=
add(new navigationpanel("panel", items));
-igor
On 7/31/07, Graham O'Regan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've seen references to similar questions around but I haven't been able
> t
I've seen references to similar questions around but I haven't been able
to find a clean solution to this problem. I want to be able to create a
panel that accepts labels and links so the html looks like this;
wicket:id="optionalLabel">[replace]
I am using Wicket 1.3.0 Beta 2 and I am having issues with the
org.apache.wicket.datetime.markup.html.form.DateTextField. Well actually
the DatePicker. I followed the code exactly in the Date examples
(http://www.wicketstuff.org/wicket13/dates/) but when I run my application
and select on the Da
Basically, this looks correct.
-Matej
On 7/31/07, Carlos Pita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think i replied why not in the other response. Couple of more
> > things. Even if the response is sent with ajax response, it's filtered
> > on client (and partially on server as well). So the dependenc
> I think i replied why not in the other response. Couple of more
> things. Even if the response is sent with ajax response, it's filtered
> on client (and partially on server as well). So the dependencies are
> not loaded more then once.
Ok Matej, I have been reading the sources to understand ho
I think i replied why not in the other response. Couple of more
things. Even if the response is sent with ajax response, it's filtered
on client (and partially on server as well). So the dependencies are
not loaded more then once.
Wicket can't know which component's renderHead method should be
inv
Well, this certainly isn't a very common use case. Invoking renderHead
for not visible components would be very problematic and confusing,
because if you had e.g. invisible ListView, then the children are not
even created so those children's renderHead wouldn't be invoked at
all. Also this wouldn't
The other remarks are not directly related to the problem but just some late
night thoughts that were fired up by it. The ajax header contribution is
fine but I think in most cases loading the component header stuff at initial
page rendering will be better, because it avoids the problem that gave p
Because of a security restriction at the browser (firefox) side. I can't
dynamically include external scripts. For example, ajax response can't
contribute http://www.google.com/uds/api?file=uds.js&v=1.0";
type="text/javascript"> (for the google search api). If it does I
get the aforemention
I don't really understand what your problem is. Wicket has AJAX header
contribution, which should load the javascript dynamically for you.
Doesn't this work for you?
-Matej
On 7/31/07, Carlos Pita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes Gwen,
>
> there are a couple of workarounds, of course, I could cal
you have to rewrite the panel and create a polling script
so something like:
boolean iscomponentready() {...} in the panel that is called by the polling
script (ajaxtimerbehavior) and when it returns true you then replace the
component. so the work of collecting all that data is done in a separat
hi,
i need a hint how to write to the stream without having the component fully
rendered.
i have e.g. 5000 emails to import and want to write each successivly to the
stream when imported.
i started with AjaxLazyLoadPanel and after that build the component to show the
import-progress (i.e. writi
On 7/31/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> AFAIUI the serialization already occurs on the server: the session
> will be locked while you retrieve the panel contents. The client's
> single request channel makes the congestion on the server less (less
> threads waiting for access to
AFAIUI the serialization already occurs on the server: the session
will be locked while you retrieve the panel contents. The client's
single request channel makes the congestion on the server less (less
threads waiting for access to the user's session).
If you have 3 lazy panels on your page, that
Yes Gwen,
there are a couple of workarounds, of course, I could call renderHead
explicitly from the page too. But the case seems not too uncommon imo (a
component that includes some external javascript and isn't showed at first).
Maybe it should be supported directly by wicket, after all a compone
David Leangen wrote:
One suggestion: what about having a date pojo like:
public class MyDate
{
get/setMonth()
get/setDay()
get/setYear()
public Date getDate()
{
// translate object state into a Date object
}
}
Then use PropertyModel to get/set the individual fields:
Componen
When trying to use two different lazy loaded panels i noticed that they
appear to be serialized. The current implements uses a
AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior to create the call back to lazy load the actual
content. But these calls appear to be serialized in a page. Would it make
more sense to use a
session (in mem only) cookies are most likely usable.
But i don't see a big plus for them in a wicket application..
disk based cookies could be blocked earlier by people (privacy)
and third party cookies are now blocked by pretty much all the browsers
(so the url is www.wicket.org and the cookie t
> > Would it be possible to have the current 1.2.7 snapshot posted on the
> > repository on the wicket-stuff site?
> http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/wicket/wicket/1.2-SNAPSHOT/
Ahhh... so that's how that works.
Ok, thanks!
-
Actually, in the normal case, I just use normal cookies (i.e. stored to disk
like you write below).
Does it happen often that a user has cookies disabled or a client does not
support cookies?
Or am I being too paranoid, here?
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAI
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/wicket/wicket/1.2-SNAPSHOT/
On 7/30/07, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to have the current 1.2.7 snapshot posted on the
> repository on the wicket-stuff site?
>
> Is there anything I can do to get my hands dirty? Or do I ne
i guess you want to set a cookie that is stored on disc on the client?
because setting a cookie that is a session cookie doesn't really make much
sense
except if you really also don't create a http session./wicket session
But if it is a stored cookie then appending it to the url doesn't make much
There's something that's eluding me here...
I have a wizard. The wizard includes a static XxxStep class. From within
that Step, I change the Locale.
All my stuff is updated right away with the new locale except for one
place...
I have a menu that holds various items. Most are links, but one of
or
WebApplication
{
public void sessionDestroyed(String sessionId)
}
do call super!
johan
On 7/31/07, Martin Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mark Sandori schrieb:
> > Does anyone know how to detect a session timeout in Wicket 1.3 Beta 2?
> >
> > Right now a new session is silently being cr
I've in My application class this:
getApplicationSettings().setPageExpiredErrorPage(MyPageExpired.class);
In my application I've got a "menu" - a few links to other pages. If i click
links everything works ok, but if click a link or two, and go back with
browser's back button two times and go for
On Tuesday, July 31, 2007, 7:30:34 AM, Carlos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a component that contributes some javascript to the header. Initially
> the component won't be shown but an ajax event could make it visible. The
> problem is that the javascript is contributed later, during the ajax
erm... that's what coding outside the IDE does to you:-)
class YourApplication . {
protected ISessionStore newSessionStore()
{
return new MySessionStore(...);
}
}
I meant:
class YourApplication . {
protected ISessionStore newSessionStore()
{
return new YourNewSe
Mark Sandori schrieb:
Does anyone know how to detect a session timeout in Wicket 1.3 Beta 2?
Right now a new session is silently being created automatically after
a timeout.
Thanks,
Mark.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
On 7/30/07, Ed_ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/wicket-commits/200707.mbox/[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
> Is there any correlation?
I don't think so, but I'm not much more experienced with wicket than
you are :-)
> > Thanks the toString override seems to work in t
41 matches
Mail list logo
