Re: Lazy load exception wicket and hibernate
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 8:04 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, I think you just have it backwards. The OpenEntityManagerInViewFilter should be mapped before the WicketFilter. i dont know if my english is broken or what, but i believe that is exactly what ive been saying all along... -igor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JavaScript w/ Flash Player - Need guidance on to generate session-relative url's
I appreciate your reply. The problem I'm having is that I really need a way
to have a component that basically adds this JavaScript as a link:
lt;a href=javascript:playFile('linktofilehere.mp3')gt;Play [1]lt;/agt;
(The anythinghere.mp3 part would be dynamically generated depending on what
I absolutely need it to end with the file extension because it seems like
this player I'm using requires that or it ignores the file. I would prefer
session-relative urls, basically I mean having something that would be where
I above have linktofilehere.mp3 replaced with
http://localhost:8080/pagetwo.5?wkt:i=:5:fileTestLink::IResourceListener::;
+ .mp3
if that would work...
Partly, I want to be able to maximize control, so it will require people to
be on the site to play the files, etc.
Thanks!
Mr Mean wrote:
wicket urls contain page /component id's and versions that are
generated based on the session (id counters etc), if that is what you
mean by session relative urls.
Your javascript will probably have a hard time figuring out which
sound to play if you use those urls as mapping, it might work if you
trigger using onclick, i don't know which is used.
Mounting bookkmarkable pages / resources will ease the mapping as you
said. So i am a bit confused as to what else you need.
If you use Link's or ResourceLink's you can simply override onclick to
increment your counter / do logging. Or am i missing something?
Maurice
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JavaScript-w--Flash-Player---Need-guidance-on-to-generate-session-relative-url%27s-tp16366136p16379383.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Page-dependent timeout values for session
Hi Nino Hmm that could break the flow is my guess(as it would force the url back to whatever was set in the iframe attribute), i'd actually say that it were whatever was contained withing the iframe responsability to use keepalives... Sorry, but i couldn't see the conclusion here. Do you mean it's not possible to achieve my goal in general or only by using the timer? Cheers Per - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JavaScript w/ Flash Player - Need guidance on to generate session-relative url's
You could use a WebMarkupContainer with a an attributemodifier to
generate the href part:
add(new WebMarkupContainer(link).add(new
SimpleAttributeModifier(href,javascript:playFile(.)));
and in your html a wicket:id=linkfoo/a
The downside of that is that you won't be able to update a server side
counter or log the click serverside easilly.
You could also use an AjaxLink with an AjaxCallDecorator to append
your playFile javascript. eventhough ajaxlink works on the onclick
attribute and sets the href to # the effect should be the same and you
can listen for the clicks server side in the onclick of the ajaxlink.
Maurice
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 9:54 AM, jpswain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I appreciate your reply. The problem I'm having is that I really need a way
to have a component that basically adds this JavaScript as a link:
lt;a href=javascript:playFile('linktofilehere.mp3')gt;Play [1]lt;/agt;
(The anythinghere.mp3 part would be dynamically generated depending on what
I absolutely need it to end with the file extension because it seems like
this player I'm using requires that or it ignores the file. I would prefer
session-relative urls, basically I mean having something that would be where
I above have linktofilehere.mp3 replaced with
http://localhost:8080/pagetwo.5?wkt:i=:5:fileTestLink::IResourceListener::;
+ .mp3
if that would work...
Partly, I want to be able to maximize control, so it will require people to
be on the site to play the files, etc.
Thanks!
Mr Mean wrote:
wicket urls contain page /component id's and versions that are
generated based on the session (id counters etc), if that is what you
mean by session relative urls.
Your javascript will probably have a hard time figuring out which
sound to play if you use those urls as mapping, it might work if you
trigger using onclick, i don't know which is used.
Mounting bookkmarkable pages / resources will ease the mapping as you
said. So i am a bit confused as to what else you need.
If you use Link's or ResourceLink's you can simply override onclick to
increment your counter / do logging. Or am i missing something?
Maurice
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JavaScript-w--Flash-Player---Need-guidance-on-to-generate-session-relative-url%27s-tp16366136p16379383.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fileupload?
The problem is that it could be pretty big and then it isnt kept in memory but streamed to disk. Then you also can do that by getting the stream and stream it to your wanted location. Maybe wicket could see it was connected to a byt[] and then autoi dump, but i dont know if that is a good default. On 3/29/08, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthew Young wrote: I suddenly are a bit stomped why you have todo so much when it comes to uploading files (and yes I am aware that it is only a few more lines of code).. What is todo so much? You need to tell people what it is exactly, like put up some code? Otherwise no one can tell exactly what you are doing. Well, I thought it were self explaining... Anyway, isn't fileupoad just as simple as textfield? upload = new FileUploadField(upload); form.add(upload); Well, I suppose adding is, but in order to get it to actually do something you need to do this aswell, in the onsubmit part of your form: | final FileUpload upload = fileUploadField.getFileUpload(); And this is where it breaks normal procedure.. You could argue that whats wicket supposed todo with the file? But since I am giving a compoundModel that has a field taking a bytearray wicket could place the content in the property... | On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I am getting very used to the wicket way, using compound models with my form fields labels an so on. I suddenly are a bit stomped why you have todo so much when it comes to uploading files (and yes I am aware that it is only a few more lines of code).. I think the fileupload field should work just as text field etc.. But as with other stuff I get puzzled by there are probably a very good reason why it dosent? -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A component that the markup is button
Hello all, The Button in wicket expects the html markup input I want to create, if there is none, a component for the button ... markup. My aim is to get a markup like the following: button id=dinamiButton style=background:transparent; border-style:none; cursor:pointer; table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 tr td valign=middle class=butLnbsp;/td td align=center valign=middle nowrap=nowrap class=butMButton Text/td td valign=middle class=butRnbsp;/td /tr /table So, how do I start? How do I create my own new Wicket component? I would love to contribute it as StyledButton or something :) Thanks -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
Re: Lazy load exception wicket and hibernate
Sorry, my bad. I made a typo earlier what may have caused the confusion: On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 7:15 AM, lars vonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IIRC you should put the OpenEntityManagerInViewFilter definition in the filter-mapping after the WicketFilter otherwise the WicketFilter will come first. I of course meant *before the WicketFilter*, because like I stated later on in the mail that it's the definition of the *filter-mapping* element that depicts the order of execution. So we are all on the same page here :-). Lars On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 8:04 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, I think you just have it backwards. The OpenEntityManagerInViewFilter should be mapped before the WicketFilter. i dont know if my english is broken or what, but i believe that is exactly what ive been saying all along... -igor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lazy load exception wicket and hibernate
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:01 AM, lars vonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IIRC you should put the OpenEntityManagerInViewFilter definition in the filter-mapping after the WicketFilter otherwise the WicketFilter will come first. I of course meant *before the WicketFilter*, because like I stated later on in the mail that it's the definition of the *filter-mapping* element that depicts the order of execution. So we are all on the same page here :-). Yes, that's what I was originally questioning. I figured it was a typo, but I wanted to make sure, because I always thought it was the other way around. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fileupload?
I admit, the word stomped is probably a bit exaggerated. But in my case the backing model is actually a JPA class, so if wicket picked it up by default, tad it would be written directly to db.. Johan Compagner wrote: The problem is that it could be pretty big and then it isnt kept in memory but streamed to disk. Then you also can do that by getting the stream and stream it to your wanted location. Maybe wicket could see it was connected to a byt[] and then autoi dump, but i dont know if that is a good default. Yeah this was what I were thinking.. I see what you mean about it being default etc, but that would be up to the users responsibility(to do this or maybe override the filedupload class's method) as with alot of other stuff with wicket.. WDYT? On 3/29/08, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthew Young wrote: I suddenly are a bit stomped why you have todo so much when it comes to uploading files (and yes I am aware that it is only a few more lines of code).. What is todo so much? You need to tell people what it is exactly, like put up some code? Otherwise no one can tell exactly what you are doing. Well, I thought it were self explaining... Anyway, isn't fileupoad just as simple as textfield? upload = new FileUploadField(upload); form.add(upload); Well, I suppose adding is, but in order to get it to actually do something you need to do this aswell, in the onsubmit part of your form: | final FileUpload upload = fileUploadField.getFileUpload(); And this is where it breaks normal procedure.. You could argue that whats wicket supposed todo with the file? But since I am giving a compoundModel that has a field taking a bytearray wicket could place the content in the property... | On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I am getting very used to the wicket way, using compound models with my form fields labels an so on. I suddenly are a bit stomped why you have todo so much when it comes to uploading files (and yes I am aware that it is only a few more lines of code).. I think the fileupload field should work just as text field etc.. But as with other stuff I get puzzled by there are probably a very good reason why it dosent? -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Modal Window problem with IE
Hi, I tried the Modal Page example in the Wicket examples http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ajax/modal-window.1 with IE. When I pressed Show modal dialog with a page and in the modal window press either OK or Cancel the result is not shown on the main page and there is no possibility to press any link. Only after reloading the page you could see the result (OK or Cancel) on the main page. Using Firefox everthing works as expected and the result is shown directly after closing the modal window. Is there a workaround for IE users, that the result is shown directly and the links are not blocked after returning from a modal page? Thanks in advance Thomas -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Modal-Window-problem-with-IE-tp16380817p16380817.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
changing html
Hi,
I am using behaviors for beforeRender and onRender to add html markups.
private void init() {
add(HeaderContributor.forCss(MyButton.class, MyButton.css));
add(new AbstractBehavior() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
public void beforeRender(Component component) {
component.getResponse().write(Consts.getBeforeRender());
}
@Override
public void onRendered(Component component) {
component.getResponse().write(Consts.getOnRenedered());
}
});
}
in order to get:
span class=buttoninput type=submit name=foo value=yout text
//span
This works great!
BUT,
sometimes, when the button should be disabled, I want to have this instead
in the markup:
del class=buttonspanyout text/span/del
The problem is that when constructing the button, I don't know the enable
status.
I set button.setEnabled only after creating it.
Is there a way to change the markup when someone sets to enable-false?
Thanks
--
Eyal Golan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
Re: A component that the markup is button
also, the restriction should not be there...you should be able to attach Button to [button type=submit] without problems... -igor On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: do you want this button to submit the form? -igor On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:56 AM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, The Button in wicket expects the html markup input I want to create, if there is none, a component for the button ... markup. My aim is to get a markup like the following: button id=dinamiButton style=background:transparent; border-style:none; cursor:pointer; table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 tr td valign=middle class=butLnbsp;/td td align=center valign=middle nowrap=nowrap class=butMButton Text/td td valign=middle class=butRnbsp;/td /tr /table So, how do I start? How do I create my own new Wicket component? I would love to contribute it as StyledButton or something :) Thanks -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does Wicket support WML?
I don't see why it couldn't, WML is XML based so you could create your own components. You should check out the page on the Wiki for wicket and mobile devices. Do you have a strict requirement that it needs to be WML or just for mobile devices? http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/mobile-devices.html Jeremy On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:21 AM, nlif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Does Wicket support WML? I could not find any reference to that in the documentation. What would be required for using Wicket to generate WML pages? Does it require me to write my own Wicket components? Thanks, Naaman -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Does-Wicket-support-WML--tp16378982p16378982.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A component that the markup is button
For your first question - yes I found out that ImageButton must have input as tag. As for my problem, I found a nicer solution that using CSS I can manipulate the image. (I will put here the link tomorrow when I'll be back at work). As for my original question, I would still love a kick start of how to make a (almost totally) new component. Thanks for all the help On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: also, the restriction should not be there...you should be able to attach Button to [button type=submit] without problems... -igor On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: do you want this button to submit the form? -igor On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:56 AM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, The Button in wicket expects the html markup input I want to create, if there is none, a component for the button ... markup. My aim is to get a markup like the following: button id=dinamiButton style=background:transparent; border-style:none; cursor:pointer; table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 tr td valign=middle class=butLnbsp;/td td align=center valign=middle nowrap=nowrap class=butMButton Text/td td valign=middle class=butRnbsp;/td /tr /table So, how do I start? How do I create my own new Wicket component? I would love to contribute it as StyledButton or something :) Thanks -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
Re: Page-dependent timeout values for session
Hi Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael: It depends. If it's okay to go to the url you specify in the iframe on repainting, it will work. If whatever happens in the iframe is part of a flow, it could break it (but it depends on a lot of things) like how does the other application handle sessions etc. If the application which are within were using keepalives/ajaxtimers etc it would not cause timeouts in the first place.. I only have one application, thats why i would like to assign timeout value by page. The part in the IFRAME represents a preselection for a hotel booking service (normal stuff like adults, nights, checkin day selection etc.). The selection is validated and set to valid values using ajax. The preselection-page contains a button which onsubmit opens another window with the booking page. So i would like to set the timeout value for preselection un-limited and for bookingpage to 10 minutes. Btw what are keepalives - are they wicket parts - never heared of it? Thanks for your help Per - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Possible to modify a decedent html tag attr of a component without the tag being a child component?
I have a link like this: a wicket:id=linkimg src=face.png//a When link.isEnable() == false, I need to add style attribute to the img tag. Is it possible to do this without turning the img into a child component of the link?
Re: Page-dependent timeout values for session
the way sessions timeout is a duration of time in which there are no requests. so if you add a bit of javascript (ajax) that makes a server side call every 5 minutes, the session will never timeout as long as the webpage is open in the browser, because the server sees a request come in every 5 minutes. -gor On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Per Newgro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael: It depends. If it's okay to go to the url you specify in the iframe on repainting, it will work. If whatever happens in the iframe is part of a flow, it could break it (but it depends on a lot of things) like how does the other application handle sessions etc. If the application which are within were using keepalives/ajaxtimers etc it would not cause timeouts in the first place.. I only have one application, thats why i would like to assign timeout value by page. The part in the IFRAME represents a preselection for a hotel booking service (normal stuff like adults, nights, checkin day selection etc.). The selection is validated and set to valid values using ajax. The preselection-page contains a button which onsubmit opens another window with the booking page. So i would like to set the timeout value for preselection un-limited and for bookingpage to 10 minutes. Btw what are keepalives - are they wicket parts - never heared of it? Thanks for your help Per - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Possible to modify a decedent html tag attr of a component without the tag being a child component?
new image(...) {
oncomponenttag(tag) {
if (link.isenabled()==false) { tag.put(class,foo); }
}
}
-igor
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a link like this:
a wicket:id=linkimg src=face.png//a
When link.isEnable() == false, I need to add style attribute to the img
tag. Is it possible to do this without turning the img into a child
component of the link?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Possible to modify a decedent html tag attr of a component without the tag being a child component?
I forgot to mention: the link is created by other people's code. I can't
change the template: I can't put wicket:id in the img tag.
new image(...) {
oncomponenttag(tag) {
if (link.isenabled()==false) { tag.put(class,foo); }
So how would this work?
new Image(there-is-not-wicket-id-to-use...
Anyway, I was hoping I can do:
link.add(new AbstractBehavior() {
onComponentTag(Component c, Component tag) {
use 'c' or 'tag' to get img
put attr into img
}
);
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
new image(...) {
oncomponenttag(tag) {
if (link.isenabled()==false) { tag.put(class,foo); }
}
}
-igor
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a link like this:
a wicket:id=linkimg src=face.png//a
When link.isEnable() == false, I need to add style attribute to the
img
tag. Is it possible to do this without turning the img into a child
component of the link?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resources relative to application context
How does wicket find such resource, e.g. as follows? link href=style/my.css type=text/css rel=stylesheet / I found this only works if I mount my pages with mount(/pages, PackageName.forClass(Home.class)); Otherwise, I need to specify absolute URL. This is fine. However, the subsequent problem I ran into is wicket failed to load resources after a form submit which is probably caused by the resulting URL not being mounted. So my question is, How do I mount the resulting URL after a form submit or other event? Is HybridUrlCodingStrategy designed for this purpose? Thanks, Xiaohong - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Page-dependent timeout values for session
Thanks Igor for your reply. Only for check if i'm right - the preselectionpage gets a javascript which makes a call to server so that session is always uptodate. When the bookingpage is displayed (click on button in preselection) the server-side call will not be done. So its timing out. I will give this a try. But i'm in doubt that it will work as i expect it, because (afaik) the session is created only once for the application - or am i wrong here? But if so the session assigned to booking page is updated to when the preselection page makes the server side call. Thanks Per - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to do h3a
On the Java side, which Components can you use if you have HTML nested like this: h3 .. Text /h3 For the h3 if I use a Label, I cannot add a Link as child because it is not a MarkupContainer. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-do-%3Ch3%3E%3Ca%3E-tp16386001p16386001.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to do h3a
It may be a WebMarkupContainer. Or nothing at all (having a component on the java side is possible, but not required) reikje a écrit : On the Java side, which Components can you use if you have HTML nested like this: h3 .. Text /h3 For the h3 if I use a Label, I cannot add a Link as child because it is not a MarkupContainer. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does Wicket support WML?
I think Jonathan's new job is going to use Wicket for WML. There has been some talk of developing it in the open or contributing it. But no assurances in that regard. At least it will take while to be included as our next release is generics only - it will only be considered in the release after that... Martijn On 3/30/08, Jeremy Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't see why it couldn't, WML is XML based so you could create your own components. You should check out the page on the Wiki for wicket and mobile devices. Do you have a strict requirement that it needs to be WML or just for mobile devices? http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/mobile-devices.html Jeremy On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:21 AM, nlif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Does Wicket support WML? I could not find any reference to that in the documentation. What would be required for using Wicket to generate WML pages? Does it require me to write my own Wicket components? Thanks, Naaman -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Does-Wicket-support-WML--tp16378982p16378982.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ListView only ListItem markup with setRenderBodyOnly
Let's say I have a ListView with this markup:
lt;span wicket:id=links
lt;span wicket:id=delimitergt;|lt;/spangt;
lt;a href=# wicket:id=linkgt;
lt;span wicket:id=linkTextgt;[[Linktext]]lt;/spangt;
lt;/agt;
lt;/spangt;
and this Java Code:
ListView paragraphs = new ListView(links, contentsToDisplay)
{
protected void populateItem(ListItem item)
{
Content content = (Content) item.getModelObject();
Label delimiter = new Label(delimiter, | );
delimiter.setVisible(item.getIndex() 0);
item.add(delimiter);
Link contentLink = getContentLink(link, content.getId());
Label linkText = new Label(linkText, content.getTitle());
linkText.setRenderBodyOnly(true);
contentLink.add(linkText);
item.add(contentLink)
}
};
paragraphs.setRenderBodyOnly(true);
add(paragraphs);
Even though I use setRenderBodyOnly on the ListView I still get the for
each list item that is rendered. Is it possible to create a ListView so that
only the Markup of the ListItems is rendered?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ListView-only-ListItem-markup-with-setRenderBodyOnly-tp16386233p16386233.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ListView only ListItem markup with setRenderBodyOnly
Use item.setRenderBodyOnly(true) instead
Martijn
On 3/30/08, reikje [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's say I have a ListView with this markup:
lt;span wicket:id=links
lt;span wicket:id=delimitergt;|lt;/spangt;
lt;a href=# wicket:id=linkgt;
lt;span wicket:id=linkTextgt;[[Linktext]]lt;/spangt;
lt;/agt;
lt;/spangt;
and this Java Code:
ListView paragraphs = new ListView(links, contentsToDisplay)
{
protected void populateItem(ListItem item)
{
Content content = (Content) item.getModelObject();
Label delimiter = new Label(delimiter, | );
delimiter.setVisible(item.getIndex() 0);
item.add(delimiter);
Link contentLink = getContentLink(link, content.getId());
Label linkText = new Label(linkText, content.getTitle());
linkText.setRenderBodyOnly(true);
contentLink.add(linkText);
item.add(contentLink)
}
};
paragraphs.setRenderBodyOnly(true);
add(paragraphs);
Even though I use setRenderBodyOnly on the ListView I still get the for
each list item that is rendered. Is it possible to create a ListView so that
only the Markup of the ListItems is rendered?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ListView-only-ListItem-markup-with-setRenderBodyOnly-tp16386233p16386233.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to do h3a
Good idea, you mean something like this: lt;h3gt; lt;a href=.. wicket:id=gt;Textlt;/agt; lt;/h3gt; That works I guess, thx Pills wrote: It may be a WebMarkupContainer. Or nothing at all (having a component on the java side is possible, but not required) reikje a écrit : On the Java side, which Components can you use if you have HTML nested like this: h3 .. Text /h3 For the h3 if I use a Label, I cannot add a Link as child because it is not a MarkupContainer. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-do-%3Ch3%3E%3Ca%3E-tp16386001p16386264.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Possible to modify a decedent html tag attr of a component without the tag being a child component?
well, you have to have the reference to that link somehow to know if
its enabled or disabled..
-igor
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forgot to mention: the link is created by other people's code. I can't
change the template: I can't put wicket:id in the img tag.
new image(...) {
oncomponenttag(tag) {
if (link.isenabled()==false) { tag.put(class,foo); }
So how would this work?
new Image(there-is-not-wicket-id-to-use...
Anyway, I was hoping I can do:
link.add(new AbstractBehavior() {
onComponentTag(Component c, Component tag) {
use 'c' or 'tag' to get img
put attr into img
}
);
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
new image(...) {
oncomponenttag(tag) {
if (link.isenabled()==false) { tag.put(class,foo); }
}
}
-igor
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a link like this:
a wicket:id=linkimg src=face.png//a
When link.isEnable() == false, I need to add style attribute to the
img
tag. Is it possible to do this without turning the img into a child
component of the link?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Resources relative to application context
see source of ContextImage for details -igor On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Zheng, Xiahong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How does wicket find such resource, e.g. as follows? link href=style/my.css type=text/css rel=stylesheet / I found this only works if I mount my pages with mount(/pages, PackageName.forClass(Home.class)); Otherwise, I need to specify absolute URL. This is fine. However, the subsequent problem I ran into is wicket failed to load resources after a form submit which is probably caused by the resulting URL not being mounted. So my question is, How do I mount the resulting URL after a form submit or other event? Is HybridUrlCodingStrategy designed for this purpose? Thanks, Xiaohong - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to add a custom form in Wicket wizard (org.apache.wicket.extensions.wizard.Wizard)
Hello, I would like to write a custom form in wicket wizard. The documentation suggested me that overriding the newForm method is what I'm searching for but I have no idea how I can do it. Could you give me an example please? My objective is to share a same form among wizard, detail and edit pages in an application. Thanks for you reply, Jirka Hradil -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-add-a-custom-form-in-Wicket-wizard-%28org.apache.wicket.extensions.wizard.Wizard%29-tp16388069p16388069.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to add a custom form in Wicket wizard (org.apache.wicket.extensions.wizard.Wizard)
simply embed your own form into the wizard step panel. wicket supports nested forms it will deal with it properly. -igor On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Jirka Hradil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I would like to write a custom form in wicket wizard. The documentation suggested me that overriding the newForm method is what I'm searching for but I have no idea how I can do it. Could you give me an example please? My objective is to share a same form among wizard, detail and edit pages in an application. Thanks for you reply, Jirka Hradil -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-add-a-custom-form-in-Wicket-wizard-%28org.apache.wicket.extensions.wizard.Wizard%29-tp16388070p16388070.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: changing html
You could overwrite onComponentTag on your component and change the
element type there based on enabled status. just make sure to call
super first. Note that this tick might not work for some components as
they require a certain html tag but i think button will be fine.
Maurice
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am using behaviors for beforeRender and onRender to add html markups.
private void init() {
add(HeaderContributor.forCss(MyButton.class, MyButton.css));
add(new AbstractBehavior() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
public void beforeRender(Component component) {
component.getResponse().write(Consts.getBeforeRender());
}
@Override
public void onRendered(Component component) {
component.getResponse().write(Consts.getOnRenedered());
}
});
}
in order to get:
span class=buttoninput type=submit name=foo value=yout text
//span
This works great!
BUT,
sometimes, when the button should be disabled, I want to have this instead
in the markup:
del class=buttonspanyout text/span/del
The problem is that when constructing the button, I don't know the enable
status.
I set button.setEnabled only after creating it.
Is there a way to change the markup when someone sets to enable-false?
Thanks
--
Eyal Golan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Possible to modify a decedent html tag attr of a component without the tag being a child component?
Yeah but still even if he has the link and overwrites oncomponenttag
on that component, he has to get the content of the link tag
(everything between a and /a) and be able to manipulate it. As far
as i know this is not possible from within wicket. The most likely
candidate getXmlTag() is private and even if that was not the case you
would have to resort to String manipulation because it does not have a
getChild(s) method.
But you might be able to do the same with some javascript. Just add a
header contributor which adds some javascript that will fetch the
first img childelement of the link and manipulate it any way you want.
Maurice
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, you have to have the reference to that link somehow to know if
its enabled or disabled..
-igor
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forgot to mention: the link is created by other people's code. I can't
change the template: I can't put wicket:id in the img tag.
new image(...) {
oncomponenttag(tag) {
if (link.isenabled()==false) { tag.put(class,foo); }
So how would this work?
new Image(there-is-not-wicket-id-to-use...
Anyway, I was hoping I can do:
link.add(new AbstractBehavior() {
onComponentTag(Component c, Component tag) {
use 'c' or 'tag' to get img
put attr into img
}
);
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
new image(...) {
oncomponenttag(tag) {
if (link.isenabled()==false) { tag.put(class,foo); }
}
}
-igor
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have a link like this:
a wicket:id=linkimg src=face.png//a
When link.isEnable() == false, I need to add style attribute to the
img
tag. Is it possible to do this without turning the img into a
child
component of the link?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Possible to modify a decedent html tag attr of a component without the tag being a child component?
well, if you dont want img to be a child component use a label to
output the entire markup, and change that based on whether or not the
link is enabled.
-igor
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah but still even if he has the link and overwrites oncomponenttag
on that component, he has to get the content of the link tag
(everything between a and /a) and be able to manipulate it. As far
as i know this is not possible from within wicket. The most likely
candidate getXmlTag() is private and even if that was not the case you
would have to resort to String manipulation because it does not have a
getChild(s) method.
But you might be able to do the same with some javascript. Just add a
header contributor which adds some javascript that will fetch the
first img childelement of the link and manipulate it any way you want.
Maurice
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, you have to have the reference to that link somehow to know if
its enabled or disabled..
-igor
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forgot to mention: the link is created by other people's code. I
can't
change the template: I can't put wicket:id in the img tag.
new image(...) {
oncomponenttag(tag) {
if (link.isenabled()==false) { tag.put(class,foo); }
So how would this work?
new Image(there-is-not-wicket-id-to-use...
Anyway, I was hoping I can do:
link.add(new AbstractBehavior() {
onComponentTag(Component c, Component tag) {
use 'c' or 'tag' to get img
put attr into img
}
);
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
new image(...) {
oncomponenttag(tag) {
if (link.isenabled()==false) { tag.put(class,foo); }
}
}
-igor
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have a link like this:
a wicket:id=linkimg src=face.png//a
When link.isEnable() == false, I need to add style attribute to
the
img
tag. Is it possible to do this without turning the img into a
child
component of the link?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best method of testing borders
Hi, I want to unit test some component behaviors I've created. Is there a nice way of doing this without having to stub out dummy pages? The only example I can find is http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/test/java/org/apache/wicket/behavior/AttributeAppenderTest.java but its a pretty basic test. I'd like to test the values of a tag based on some activity, but would rather not have dummy page classes kicking around. Rgds Ned -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Best-method-of-testing-borders-tp16389412p16389412.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Best method of testing behaviors.
Oops - i stuffed up the title. Should be testing behaviors -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Best-method-of-testing-borders-tp16389412p16389616.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Best method of testing behaviors.
you really need just one dummy page to test all behaviors... -igor On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Ned Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oops - i stuffed up the title. Should be testing behaviors -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Best-method-of-testing-borders-tp16389412p16389616.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Best method of testing behaviors.
What I've done is.. but feels like it could be nicer. (but this is alright
really :))
public void testMyBehavior() {
//create form component to have behaviour placed around it.
FormComponent component = new TextField(testId, new
Model(testFieldValue));
component.error(An error);
XmlTag xmlTag = new XmlTag();
xmlTag.setName(test);
ComponentTag tag = new ComponentTag(xmlTag);
MyBehavior behavior = new MyBehavior();
behavior.onComponentTag(component, tag);
assert(tag.someproperty stuff to test).
}
The thing that was confusing me thus far, was wicketTester.startComponent.
Seems like I'm better off not using it.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Best-method-of-testing-borders-tp16389412p16389744.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Best method of testing behaviors.
If you are testing something non trivial you will most likely need the
entire environment setup ( requestcycle, session, etc )
That is what start component does I believe.
-igor
On 3/30/08, Ned Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I've done is.. but feels like it could be nicer. (but this is alright
really :))
public void testMyBehavior() {
//create form component to have behaviour placed around it.
FormComponent component = new TextField(testId, new
Model(testFieldValue));
component.error(An error);
XmlTag xmlTag = new XmlTag();
xmlTag.setName(test);
ComponentTag tag = new ComponentTag(xmlTag);
MyBehavior behavior = new MyBehavior();
behavior.onComponentTag(component, tag);
assert(tag.someproperty stuff to test).
}
The thing that was confusing me thus far, was wicketTester.startComponent.
Seems like I'm better off not using it.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Best-method-of-testing-borders-tp16389412p16389744.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resources relative to application context
Thanks Igor. But my resource in this case is style sheet not image. Does that mean I need to write a similar component to accomplish that? -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 3:48 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Resources relative to application context see source of ContextImage for details -igor On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Zheng, Xiahong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How does wicket find such resource, e.g. as follows? link href=style/my.css type=text/css rel=stylesheet / I found this only works if I mount my pages with mount(/pages, PackageName.forClass(Home.class)); Otherwise, I need to specify absolute URL. This is fine. However, the subsequent problem I ran into is wicket failed to load resources after a form submit which is probably caused by the resulting URL not being mounted. So my question is, How do I mount the resulting URL after a form submit or other event? Is HybridUrlCodingStrategy designed for this purpose? Thanks, Xiaohong - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
continueToOriginalDestination resolves to wrong URL
Scenario, 1) request http://myapp/pages/watchlist 2) throws throw new RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(Login.class); 3) Use sign in 4) user redirected to http://pages/watchlist note: path /myapp is dropped Any idea? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to make img src in a component's template resolve to the image files in the package?
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... I don't want to hard code /resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/open.png in the template and just have img src=open.png .../. Is there someway to work out the prefix /resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/ and fix up src attribute in code? If you are in a Component you can call Component#urlFor(). If not in a Component, you can call: RequestCycle.get()#urlFor(); You can use the form that takes a ResourceReference for the image. HTH, Enrique - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to make img src in a component's template resolve to the image files in the package?
Use wicket:link tags around the image -igor On 3/30/08, Enrique Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... I don't want to hard code /resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/open.png in the template and just have img src=open.png .../. Is there someway to work out the prefix /resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/ and fix up src attribute in code? If you are in a Component you can call Component#urlFor(). If not in a Component, you can call: RequestCycle.get()#urlFor(); You can use the form that takes a ResourceReference for the image. HTH, Enrique - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to make img src in a component's template resolve to the image files in the package?
So I did this: html xmlns:wicket body wicket:panel wicket:linkimg wicket:id=open src=open.png//wicket:link /wicket:panel /body /html the src attr doesn't change, it stays as open.png and not change to /resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/open.png On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Use wicket:link tags around the image -igor On 3/30/08, Enrique Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... I don't want to hard code /resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/open.png in the template and just have img src=open.png .../. Is there someway to work out the prefix /resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/ and fix up src attribute in code? If you are in a Component you can call Component#urlFor(). If not in a Component, you can call: RequestCycle.get()#urlFor(); You can use the form that takes a ResourceReference for the image. HTH, Enrique - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to make img src in a component's template resolve to the image files in the package?
thats because you have a wicket:id there. wicket:link doesnt touch components afaik -igor On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I did this: html xmlns:wicket body wicket:panel wicket:linkimg wicket:id=open src=open.png//wicket:link /wicket:panel /body /html the src attr doesn't change, it stays as open.png and not change to /resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/open.png On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Use wicket:link tags around the image -igor On 3/30/08, Enrique Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... I don't want to hard code /resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/open.png in the template and just have img src=open.png .../. Is there someway to work out the prefix /resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/ and fix up src attribute in code? If you are in a Component you can call Component#urlFor(). If not in a Component, you can call: RequestCycle.get()#urlFor(); You can use the form that takes a ResourceReference for the image. HTH, Enrique - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to make img src in a component's template resolve to the image files in the package?
wicket:link doesnt touch components afaik
:( I need it to be a component. My code is basically this:
add(new WebMarkupContainer(img));
Can I do something like this:
add(new WebMarkupContainer(img) {
@Override protected void onComponentTag(final ComponentTag tag)
{
super.onComponentTag(tag);
tag.put(src, GIVE-ME-YOU-LOCATION-PLEASE + tag.getString(src));
}
});
where GIVE-ME-YOU-LOCATION-PLEASE is some method to get
/resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/?
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
thats because you have a wicket:id there. wicket:link doesnt touch
components afaik
-igor
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I did this:
html xmlns:wicket
body
wicket:panel
wicket:linkimg wicket:id=open src=open.png//wicket:link
/wicket:panel
/body
/html
the src attr doesn't change, it stays as open.png and not change to
/resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/open.png
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use wicket:link tags around the image
-igor
On 3/30/08, Enrique Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...
I don't want to hard code
/resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/open.png in the
template
and just have img src=open.png .../. Is there someway to work
out
the
prefix /resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/ and fix
up
src
attribute in code?
If you are in a Component you can call Component#urlFor().
If not in a Component, you can call:
RequestCycle.get()#urlFor();
You can use the form that takes a ResourceReference for the image.
HTH,
Enrique
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to make img src in a component's template resolve to the image files in the package?
urlfor(new ResourceReference(MyComponent.class, image.png));
-igor
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wicket:link doesnt touch components afaik
:( I need it to be a component. My code is basically this:
add(new WebMarkupContainer(img));
Can I do something like this:
add(new WebMarkupContainer(img) {
@Override protected void onComponentTag(final ComponentTag tag)
{
super.onComponentTag(tag);
tag.put(src, GIVE-ME-YOU-LOCATION-PLEASE + tag.getString(src));
}
});
where GIVE-ME-YOU-LOCATION-PLEASE is some method to get
/resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/?
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
thats because you have a wicket:id there. wicket:link doesnt touch
components afaik
-igor
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I did this:
html xmlns:wicket
body
wicket:panel
wicket:linkimg wicket:id=open src=open.png//wicket:link
/wicket:panel
/body
/html
the src attr doesn't change, it stays as open.png and not change to
/resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/open.png
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use wicket:link tags around the image
-igor
On 3/30/08, Enrique Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...
I don't want to hard code
/resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/open.png in the
template
and just have img src=open.png .../. Is there someway to work
out
the
prefix /resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/ and fix
up
src
attribute in code?
If you are in a Component you can call Component#urlFor().
If not in a Component, you can call:
RequestCycle.get()#urlFor();
You can use the form that takes a ResourceReference for the image.
HTH,
Enrique
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intention of PropertyModel in 1.3
I didn't happen to see a reply to this thread, and the stack trace is still driving me bananas, so I submitted a patch. :-) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1464 Thanks, as always, Wicket committers. :-) On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 12:45 +0900, David Leangen wrote: This used to work in 1.2.6, but now 1.3.1 complains that there is no setter for this class. hmm, this should still work. mind filing a jira bug with a quickstart? You're right, it does still work. The thing is that during the algorithm when the properties of the bean are being tested the entire exception stack is being printed out. This is a bit confusing because it can lead the developer to think that an error occurred. I propose to log information instead of printing out the entire exception stack. If you agree to this, I don't mind submitting a patch. What level is this reported to? Its not error right? Current, DEBUG. Still, though, I think a logging message would be better than polluting output with the entire stack trace... Cheers, Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Best method of testing behaviors.
Do you have an example of how we would go about this? igor.vaynberg wrote: you really need just one dummy page to test all behaviors... -igor -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Best-method-of-testing-borders-tp16389412p16391872.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intention of PropertyModel in 1.3
patch applied. always report a jira issue, that way things dont get forgotten, and as you can see submitting a patch helps too :) -igor On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 9:36 PM, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I didn't happen to see a reply to this thread, and the stack trace is still driving me bananas, so I submitted a patch. :-) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1464 Thanks, as always, Wicket committers. :-) On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 12:45 +0900, David Leangen wrote: This used to work in 1.2.6, but now 1.3.1 complains that there is no setter for this class. hmm, this should still work. mind filing a jira bug with a quickstart? You're right, it does still work. The thing is that during the algorithm when the properties of the bean are being tested the entire exception stack is being printed out. This is a bit confusing because it can lead the developer to think that an error occurred. I propose to log information instead of printing out the entire exception stack. If you agree to this, I don't mind submitting a patch. What level is this reported to? Its not error right? Current, DEBUG. Still, though, I think a logging message would be better than polluting output with the entire stack trace... Cheers, Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Best method of testing behaviors.
class behaviortestpage extends webpage {
public behaviortestpage(IBehavior subject) {
add(new webmarkupcontainer(container).add(subject));
}
}
behaviortestpage.html
div wicket:id=container/div
-igor
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Ned Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have an example of how we would go about this?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
you really need just one dummy page to test all behaviors...
-igor
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Best-method-of-testing-borders-tp16389412p16391872.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Best method of testing behaviors.
That's great.
However, I'm having strange behavior when I send an instance of a page to
the tester. I'll start ripping out bits of my application class and see if
thats effecting it,
Failing
//start and render the test page
tester.startPage(new HomePage());
//assert rendered page class
tester.assertRenderedPage(HomePage.class);
While this works
tester.startPage(HomePage.class)
tester.assertRenderedPage(HomePage.class);
The stacktrace I get is as follows
INFO - RequestListenerInterface - registered listener interface
[RequestListenerInterface name=IActivePageBehaviorListener, method=public
abstract void org.apache.wicket.behavior.IBehaviorListener.onRequest()]
ERROR - RequestCycle - For input string: testPage
java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: testPage
at
java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:48)
at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:447)
at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:497)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.urlcompressing.UrlCompressor.getComponentAndInterfaceForUID(UrlCompressor.java:122)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.urlcompressing.UrlCompressingWebRequestProcessor.resolveListenerInterfaceTarget(UrlCompressingWebRequestProcessor.java:79)
at
org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.resolveRenderedPage(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:461)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycleProcessor.resolve(WebRequestCycleProcessor.java:139)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1224)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1330)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:493)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.MockWebApplication.processRequestCycle(MockWebApplication.java:387)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.MockWebApplication.processRequestCycle(MockWebApplication.java:375)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.tester.BaseWicketTester.executeListener(BaseWicketTester.java:248)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.tester.BaseWicketTester.startPage(BaseWicketTester.java:233)
at
com.mine.page.HomePageUnitTest.testRenderHomePage(HomePageUnitTest.java:21)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:59)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTestMethod(MethodRoadie.java:98)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:79)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(MethodRoadie.java:87)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:77)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:42)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.invokeTestMethod(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:88)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.runMethods(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:51)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner$1.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:44)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:27)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:37)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:42)
at
com.intellij.rt.junit4.Junit4TestMethodAdapter.run(Junit4TestMethodAdapter.java:49)
at junit.textui.TestRunner.doRun(TestRunner.java:116)
at
com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.IdeaTestRunner.doRun(IdeaTestRunner.java:65)
at junit.textui.TestRunner.doRun(TestRunner.java:109)
at
com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(IdeaTestRunner.java:24)
at
com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:118)
at
com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:40)
igor.vaynberg wrote:
class behaviortestpage extends webpage {
public behaviortestpage(IBehavior subject) {
add(new webmarkupcontainer(container).add(subject));
}
}
behaviortestpage.html
div wicket:id=container/div
-igor
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Best-method-of-testing-borders-tp16389412p1639.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Best method of testing behaviors.
weird, we use that construct all over the place. eg see FormSubmitTest
-igor
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Ned Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's great.
However, I'm having strange behavior when I send an instance of a page to
the tester. I'll start ripping out bits of my application class and see if
thats effecting it,
Failing
//start and render the test page
tester.startPage(new HomePage());
//assert rendered page class
tester.assertRenderedPage(HomePage.class);
While this works
tester.startPage(HomePage.class)
tester.assertRenderedPage(HomePage.class);
The stacktrace I get is as follows
INFO - RequestListenerInterface - registered listener interface
[RequestListenerInterface name=IActivePageBehaviorListener, method=public
abstract void org.apache.wicket.behavior.IBehaviorListener.onRequest()]
ERROR - RequestCycle - For input string: testPage
java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: testPage
at
java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:48)
at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:447)
at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:497)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.urlcompressing.UrlCompressor.getComponentAndInterfaceForUID(UrlCompressor.java:122)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.urlcompressing.UrlCompressingWebRequestProcessor.resolveListenerInterfaceTarget(UrlCompressingWebRequestProcessor.java:79)
at
org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.resolveRenderedPage(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:461)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycleProcessor.resolve(WebRequestCycleProcessor.java:139)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1224)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1330)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:493)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.MockWebApplication.processRequestCycle(MockWebApplication.java:387)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.MockWebApplication.processRequestCycle(MockWebApplication.java:375)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.tester.BaseWicketTester.executeListener(BaseWicketTester.java:248)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.tester.BaseWicketTester.startPage(BaseWicketTester.java:233)
at
com.mine.page.HomePageUnitTest.testRenderHomePage(HomePageUnitTest.java:21)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:59)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTestMethod(MethodRoadie.java:98)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:79)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(MethodRoadie.java:87)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:77)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:42)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.invokeTestMethod(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:88)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.runMethods(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:51)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner$1.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:44)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:27)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:37)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:42)
at
com.intellij.rt.junit4.Junit4TestMethodAdapter.run(Junit4TestMethodAdapter.java:49)
at junit.textui.TestRunner.doRun(TestRunner.java:116)
at
com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.IdeaTestRunner.doRun(IdeaTestRunner.java:65)
at junit.textui.TestRunner.doRun(TestRunner.java:109)
at
com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(IdeaTestRunner.java:24)
at
com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:118)
at
com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:40)
igor.vaynberg wrote:
class behaviortestpage extends webpage {
public behaviortestpage(IBehavior subject) {
add(new webmarkupcontainer(container).add(subject));
}
}
behaviortestpage.html
div wicket:id=container/div
-igor
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Best-method-of-testing-borders-tp16389412p1639.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Best method of testing behaviors.
I'll check it. Something to note is, I do not have testPage string inside my code at all. Near as I can tell the problem is stemmed from DummyHomePage.java igor.vaynberg wrote: weird, we use that construct all over the place. eg see FormSubmitTest -igor -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Best-method-of-testing-borders-tp16389412p16392347.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best Wicket Books or Tutorials
Which framework should I invest in JSF/Struts 2/Spring MVC/Wicket for someone moving from jsp? If Wicket then I'm looking for good tutorials on wicket or books. How does Enjoying Web Development with Wicket stackup? What's the best wicket book available? The same for the other framework
Re: Best Wicket Books or Tutorials
Wicket in action :) you're gonna get a biased answer here ;)... Gareth Segree wrote: Which framework should I invest in JSF/Struts 2/Spring MVC/Wicket for someone moving from jsp? If Wicket then I'm looking for good tutorials on wicket or books. How does Enjoying Web Development with Wicket stackup? What's the best wicket book available? The same for the other framework - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
