Re: HeaderContributer for a title
Thanks John,
That is a great way of doing it.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:35 PM, John Krasnay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like to do this in my base page:
title wicket:id=titlefoo/title
protected IModel getPageTitleModel() {
return new ResourceModel(getClass().getSimpleName());
}
add(new Label(title, new AbstractReadOnlyModel() {
public Object getObject() {
return getPageTitleModel().getObject();
}
}));
The AbstractReadOnlyModel is there to ensure I'm not calling the
overrideable getPageTitleModel() from my base class constructor.
By default my page titles come from my application's .properties file,
like this:
UserPage=User
ClientPage=Client
I re-use these labels when creating links to the same page. Of course, I
can override getPageTitleModel() to return a custom title when needed.
jk
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 03:36:45PM +0300, Eyal Golan wrote:
yeah, but what if I have a markup inheritance?
I then must use wicket:head ... don't I ?
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
nope. just use:
title wicket:id=title/title
add(new Label(title, Hello, World!));
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a special header contributer for title/title ?
--
Eyal Golan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74
P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really
necessary
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Eyal Golan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74
P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really
necessary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Eyal Golan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74
P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary
Re: [Follow up] Ajax link doesn't call event
I ended up commenting loads of code and it turns out my Ajax link will quit responding if it has something else after itself in the form. I got rid of all the textfields that followed, and I got it to work. The troublesome component is actually the ajax link, plus a textfield to input data, plus a listview displaying that data (the ajax link updates the object and the listview) Thanks, Ezequiel ezegb wrote: Hi, the situation is as follows: I have a form embedded in an abstract panel. The form has an autocompletetextfield and an AjaxSubmitLink which acts on the data in the textfield. The panel, in turn, extends several other panels which are in the end the ones that get instantiated. The very code for the AjaxSubmitLink is used elsewhere and works fine. Now, the issue is that when called on this panel, it won't call its onSubmit event. It won't call any other onSubmit event, either. I am certain the code is placed in a class extending Form on the Java side, and it's certainly enclosed by form in the markup. I'm at a total loss with this situation, since it does work in the very same page (the final page has two forms, the first one works perfectly, the second -this one- does not). Any help will be most appreciated. Thanks, Ezequiel -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ajax-link-doesn%27t-call-event-tp18219220p18220869.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: patterns for web ui apps. mvc models
I've been thinking about the way in which wicket is an MVC framework and whether people use it according to the MVC pattern. The MVC pattern is bastardized - especially when it comes to web application frameworks - up to the point that it is hardly useful to use the term. Everyone seems to have their own interpretation. If you had to explain Wicket in MVC terms, my take would be that components represent the Controller and View (together, just like Swing), and the model is separated behind the IModel interface. But I think it is better to just let the whole MVC mania behind us and explain frameworks on their own terms :-) Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: patterns for web ui apps. mvc models
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been thinking about the way in which wicket is an MVC framework and whether people use it according to the MVC pattern. The MVC pattern is bastardized - especially when it comes to web application frameworks - up to the point that it is hardly useful to use the term. Everyone seems to have their own interpretation. If you had to explain Wicket in MVC terms, my take would be that components represent the Controller and View (together, just like Swing), and the model is separated behind the IModel interface. But I think it is better to just let the whole MVC mania behind us and explain frameworks on their own terms :-) You could argue that the view is the markup file and the controller is the component/page class? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Client side validation
Okay, I've attached a patch that adds the maxlength html attribute. On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do any of the core validators actually implement this interface? Not yet I think, but it's never to late :-) Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wicket @ berlin.jar Java Conference
Hi, I will present Wicket at berlin.jar. The presentation will be based on my presentation from october last year (with some updates of course). I hope to see some of you around there! :-) More infos on berlin.jar at http://berlin.jar.jug-bb.de/ Best regards, --- Jan. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: patterns for web ui apps. mvc models
Well, in Wicket the markup doesn't do much (which is a good thing) besides layout. If you're correctly using CSS, the markup isn't even responsible for the look (and feel). I don't know if this qualifies it as a 'V' in MVC. Sven James Carman schrieb: On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been thinking about the way in which wicket is an MVC framework and whether people use it according to the MVC pattern. The MVC pattern is bastardized - especially when it comes to web application frameworks - up to the point that it is hardly useful to use the term. Everyone seems to have their own interpretation. If you had to explain Wicket in MVC terms, my take would be that components represent the Controller and View (together, just like Swing), and the model is separated behind the IModel interface. But I think it is better to just let the whole MVC mania behind us and explain frameworks on their own terms :-) You could argue that the view is the markup file and the controller is the component/page class? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: patterns for web ui apps. mvc models
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Sven Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, in Wicket the markup doesn't do much (which is a good thing) besides layout. If you're correctly using CSS, the markup isn't even responsible for the look (and feel). I don't know if this qualifies it as a 'V' in MVC. Well, I don't really want to get into a debate on what is a V in MVC or not. The CSS doesn't do anything by itself. It has to be applied to something to get the view doesn't it? The HTML is an essential part (the CSS is part too) of the view. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: patterns for web ui apps. mvc models
Igor, stop taking the piss... What he means is: Wicket is *NOT* an MVC framework... On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Sven Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, in Wicket the markup doesn't do much (which is a good thing) besides layout. If you're correctly using CSS, the markup isn't even responsible for the look (and feel). I don't know if this qualifies it as a 'V' in MVC. Sven James Carman schrieb: On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been thinking about the way in which wicket is an MVC framework and whether people use it according to the MVC pattern. The MVC pattern is bastardized - especially when it comes to web application frameworks - up to the point that it is hardly useful to use the term. Everyone seems to have their own interpretation. If you had to explain Wicket in MVC terms, my take would be that components represent the Controller and View (together, just like Swing), and the model is separated behind the IModel interface. But I think it is better to just let the whole MVC mania behind us and explain frameworks on their own terms :-) You could argue that the view is the markup file and the controller is the component/page class? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: patterns for web ui apps. mvc models
you mean taking a piss? -igor On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Rodolfo Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Igor, stop taking the piss... What he means is: Wicket is *NOT* an MVC framework... On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Sven Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, in Wicket the markup doesn't do much (which is a good thing) besides layout. If you're correctly using CSS, the markup isn't even responsible for the look (and feel). I don't know if this qualifies it as a 'V' in MVC. Sven James Carman schrieb: On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been thinking about the way in which wicket is an MVC framework and whether people use it according to the MVC pattern. The MVC pattern is bastardized - especially when it comes to web application frameworks - up to the point that it is hardly useful to use the term. Everyone seems to have their own interpretation. If you had to explain Wicket in MVC terms, my take would be that components represent the Controller and View (together, just like Swing), and the model is separated behind the IModel interface. But I think it is better to just let the whole MVC mania behind us and explain frameworks on their own terms :-) You could argue that the view is the markup file and the controller is the component/page class? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multiple links on screen, same link on page?
Hi, i have a table and a couple of pagination controls (links). Is there a way of duplicate this links (i want the controls to be on top and bottom of the table) without having to add two times the same links on the page and without having to use different wicket:id for each link? Thanks! Manuel.
Re: generics
I second Matej here... maybe instead of GenericPanelT, GenericFragmentT,
etc. you could name it something more explicit. Some examples:
SingleModelPanelT
ModelBoundPanelT
It took me the better part of one day to convert a partially genericized
project (we started out with 1.3 then switched to 1.4 mid-stream). The
project had 100k++ LOC. The resulting code is much easier to read.
Another thing that you can consider adding to the core... a utilities class
'Models' to wrap models so you don't have those pesky all over the place:
public MyPanel(String id, IModelInteger model)
{
super (id, Models.compound (model)); // wrap model in a
CompoundPropertyModel
}
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
There is one thing that helped me quite a lot when migration the
project I'm working out. I've created GenericPanel,
GenericWebMarkupContainer and GenericFragment classes. In most cases
the only change was renaming PanelMyClass to GenericPanelMyClass.
I was wondering, even though those classes were farily simple, we
might want to include them in Wicket anyway, for the sake of
consistency and convenience.
-Matej
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i looked through the code and it is fine by me.
Lets test this then in a Build and see what people think of this.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
unit tests are fixed...
-igor
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm guessing somewhere this week or so. We need to flush out the unit
test failures and get some preliminary feedback. Also we need to have
time available to actually build the release.
My time is limited because we're in the final stages before publishing
and I have to read our book twice or so.
Martijn
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:36 AM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What sort of time frame are we looking at for a release with this new
generics paradigm?
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Sven Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I've just converted two projects to the new generics setup and
everything
worked out nicely.
I think this is how generics should be applied to Wicket.
Igor, thanks for your hard work on this.
wasnt just me :)
-igor
Sven
Igor Vaynberg schrieb:
development of the 1.4 branch has been quiet lately, this is
because
the core team has been busy working on an alternative way of
generifiing the framework. an early result of that effort can be
found
here [1]. The key difference in [1] is that we have decoupled the
component from the type of the model.
here is the list of major differences:
(1) only components that use their model have a generic type
(components you are likely to call getmodel/getmodelobject on as a
user). so far these are link,form,formcomponent
subclasses,listview,listitem,(other repeaters will follow soon).
this
allows for typesafety where it makes sense, and eliminates a ton
of
noise from code. we will generify others upon request if a good
usecase is provided and we think it is widely applicable.
(2) non-generified components do not have IModelT get/setModel
and
T
get/setModelObject, instead they have IModel?get/setDefaultModel
and
Object get/setDefaultModelObject. this clearly expresses that the
default component model is not tied to the type of component. this
is
a bit of a pain from the code migration point of view, but we
think
is
worth the effort. generifyed components are free to implement the
old
IModelT get/setModel, etc, but have to keep the unsafe cast
inside.
see ListItem for an example.
basically we feel this is a much cleaner way then what is 1.4m2.
this
is a call for confirmation/discussion from our user base. do try
to
port a small project or a part of a larger project you are working
on
to the [1] branch to see how the new api feels. if we do like this
more the new branch will be merged into what will be 1.4m3.
[1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/ivaynberg/generics
-igor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best:
Re: generics
I too like this compromise alot Although I don't see a good use case for generifying Link ? Am I missing something? On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Igor Vaynberg wrote: since no one complained, should we apply this change over the weekend? and soon thereafter release m3? I prefer this over M2. Even though: user). so far these are link,form,formcomponent Link might be better without the type parameter. It's no big deal though. And yes, it would be good if for example Johan and Gerolf who have invested a lot of effort on the generification could have a closer look and tell what they think before proceeding. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple links on screen, same link on page?
no, there is no way to do that. this was a restriction imposed by our ajax support. win some, lose some. -igor On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Manuel Corrales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, i have a table and a couple of pagination controls (links). Is there a way of duplicate this links (i want the controls to be on top and bottom of the table) without having to add two times the same links on the page and without having to use different wicket:id for each link? Thanks! Manuel. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: generics
onPopulateItem(ItemUser item) {
add(new LinkUser(delete, item.getModel()) {
protected void onClick() { service.delete(getModelObject()); }
});
}
-igor
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Rodolfo Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I too like this compromise alot
Although I don't see a good use case for generifying Link ?
Am I missing something?
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
since no one complained, should we apply this change over the weekend?
and soon thereafter release m3?
I prefer this over M2. Even though:
user). so far these are link,form,formcomponent
Link might be better without the type parameter. It's no big
deal though.
And yes, it would be good if for example Johan and Gerolf
who have invested a lot of effort on the generification
could have a closer look and tell what they think before
proceeding.
Best wishes,
Timo
--
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: generics
add (new LinkPerson(edit, person) {
public void onClick () {
setResponsePage (new EditPersonPage (getModel()));
}
});
This code makes a lot more sense if it is inside a repeater...
Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote:
I too like this compromise alot
Although I don't see a good use case for generifying Link ?
Am I missing something?
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
since no one complained, should we apply this change over the weekend?
and soon thereafter release m3?
I prefer this over M2. Even though:
user). so far these are link,form,formcomponent
Link might be better without the type parameter. It's no big
deal though.
And yes, it would be good if for example Johan and Gerolf
who have invested a lot of effort on the generification
could have a closer look and tell what they think before
proceeding.
Best wishes,
Timo
--
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/generics-tp18083910p18222901.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: generics
Isn't this a same thing:
onPopulateItem(final ItemUser item) {
add(new Link(delete) {
protected void onClick() { service.delete(item.getModelObject()); }
});
}
Joni
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:56 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
onPopulateItem(ItemUser item) {
add(new LinkUser(delete, item.getModel()) {
protected void onClick() { service.delete(getModelObject()); }
});
}
-igor
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Rodolfo Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I too like this compromise alot
Although I don't see a good use case for generifying Link ?
Am I missing something?
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
since no one complained, should we apply this change over the weekend?
and soon thereafter release m3?
I prefer this over M2. Even though:
user). so far these are link,form,formcomponent
Link might be better without the type parameter. It's no big
deal though.
And yes, it would be good if for example Johan and Gerolf
who have invested a lot of effort on the generification
could have a closer look and tell what they think before
proceeding.
Best wishes,
Timo
--
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: patterns for web ui apps. mvc models
joking about On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you mean taking a piss? -igor On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Rodolfo Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Igor, stop taking the piss... What he means is: Wicket is *NOT* an MVC framework... On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Sven Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, in Wicket the markup doesn't do much (which is a good thing) besides layout. If you're correctly using CSS, the markup isn't even responsible for the look (and feel). I don't know if this qualifies it as a 'V' in MVC. Sven James Carman schrieb: On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been thinking about the way in which wicket is an MVC framework and whether people use it according to the MVC pattern. The MVC pattern is bastardized - especially when it comes to web application frameworks - up to the point that it is hardly useful to use the term. Everyone seems to have their own interpretation. If you had to explain Wicket in MVC terms, my take would be that components represent the Controller and View (together, just like Swing), and the model is separated behind the IModel interface. But I think it is better to just let the whole MVC mania behind us and explain frameworks on their own terms :-) You could argue that the view is the markup file and the controller is the component/page class? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [PROPOSAL] Use path in URL when target is instance of BookmarkablePageRequestTarget
I think stateless pages already do something like that. Also look at hybrid url encoding that also preserves the bookmarkable url and makes the url even prettier. That's possible. I haven't yet made my way into 1.4 waters yet. none of this is 1.4 In any case, even if this exists for stateless pages, seems to me that this better expresses the intent. :-) Haven't checked out hybrid encoding yet, but in the case of IListenerInterfaceRequestTarget, IIRC the bookmarkable encoder is completely bypassed, so if the hybrid encoder is used the same as the other bookmarkable encoders, this won't change anything. -dml- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket Iolite, maven guru wanted
I wouldn't presume calling myself a maven guru :) but i recently build an archetype myself too. I wonder why you have to use resource in your archetype. i get that your archetype is a maven multiproject but i don't see how using resource is better then using source. I am just guessing here but what if use source instead of resource and add a modules element to the relevant pom. A different solution would be to not include that code as modules but as dependencies to a jar, that way you can avoid all the problems. Maurice BTW just looking at the wicket archetype has helped me very much. On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Could some maven guru please take a look at wicket iolite..? The problem are that it is a multi module project, so in order to get it working I had to map everything as resources in the archetype.xml , this it not good because the java package mojo does not look on these files meaning that java packages arent supported:( -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket Iolite, maven guru wanted
Maurice Marrink wrote: I wouldn't presume calling myself a maven guru :) but i recently build an archetype myself too. Any feedback highly appreciated..:) I wonder why you have to use resource in your archetype. i get that your archetype is a maven multiproject but i don't see how using resource is better then using source. Well it's better because AFAIK it's the only way to do it the multi-module way, I cant remember why exactly... I am just guessing here but what if use source instead of resource and add a modules element to the relevant pom. What i did before, but it did not work. Again something with package structure or something.. A different solution would be to not include that code as modules but as dependencies to a jar, that way you can avoid all the problems. True but then the whole template thing goes away, which leaves some flexibility out, but could actually be an okay idea now that I think about it(providing different entity setup classes etc). But still I'll loose the multi-module thing.. Maurice BTW just looking at the wicket archetype has helped me very much. On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Could some maven guru please take a look at wicket iolite..? The problem are that it is a multi module project, so in order to get it working I had to map everything as resources in the archetype.xml , this it not good because the java package mojo does not look on these files meaning that java packages arent supported:( -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: generics
Wouldn't it be better to leave the generic part to this reusable link
then? Why 'pollute' all links with a generic parameter?
Back to your definition:
(1) only components that use their model have a generic type
(components you are likely to call getmodel/getmodelobject on as a
user).
What now? Components that use their model *or* you're likely to call getmodel
on? Seems to me as two different things:
Link doesn't fit in the first category nor is it always used with a model.
Sven
Igor Vaynberg schrieb:
if your link is anonymous, yes. if you have reusable links in their
own class, then no.
-igor
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Joni Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't this a same thing:
onPopulateItem(final ItemUser item) {
add(new Link(delete) {
protected void onClick() { service.delete(item.getModelObject()); }
});
}
Joni
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:56 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
onPopulateItem(ItemUser item) {
add(new LinkUser(delete, item.getModel()) {
protected void onClick() { service.delete(getModelObject()); }
});
}
-igor
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Rodolfo Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I too like this compromise alot
Although I don't see a good use case for generifying Link ?
Am I missing something?
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
since no one complained, should we apply this change over the weekend?
and soon thereafter release m3?
I prefer this over M2. Even though:
user). so far these are link,form,formcomponent
Link might be better without the type parameter. It's no big
deal though.
And yes, it would be good if for example Johan and Gerolf
who have invested a lot of effort on the generification
could have a closer look and tell what they think before
proceeding.
Best wishes,
Timo
--
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: self refreshing table with effects
Created the jira issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1724 with
a quickstart
Initially got it to work by using HyBridURLCodingStrategy with which the
issue wasnt occuring, but then later on for some other issues with using
HUCS was to forced to use QSUCS again and the problem still remains...
Would appreciate if someone could take a look...
Thanks and Regards,
Johan Compagner wrote:
create a jira with a test case.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 2:56 AM, mfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And surprisingly, this issue comes in IE and Safari but not in Mozilla..
mfs wrote:
Any update on this issue, i am facing an issue somewhat related, where
clicking on an ajaxlink once the session expiry has reached, gives a
nullpointer exception at
BookmarkableListenerInterfaceRequestTarget.processEvents ...(Below is
the
exception stack-trace), btw i am using QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy url
coding strategy to mount the pagesThe behavior is fine for non-ajax
component, where i am taken to the session-expiry page...
Thanks in advance..
ERROR - RequestCycle -
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.BookmarkableListenerInterfaceRequestTarget.processEvents(BookmarkableListenerInterfaceRequestTarget.java:131)
at
org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.processEvents(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:91)
at
org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:1188)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1265)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1366)
at
org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:499)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:387)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:199)
at
com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:623)
at
com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:370)
at
com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.handleNotFound(HttpRequestHandler.java:1041)
at
com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.doProcessRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:911)
at
com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:453)
at
com.evermind.server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:302)
at
com.evermind.server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:190)
at
oracle.oc4j.network.ServerSocketReadHandler$SafeRunnable.run(ServerSocketReadHandler.java:260)
at
com.evermind.util.ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor$MyWorker.run(ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor.java:303)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Johan Compagner wrote:
Please make a jira issue for this with an example
On 2/20/08, okrohne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I tried QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy and MixedParamUrlCodingStrategy
and
both are throwing
exceptions. I looked at the example in chapter 15.2 , I don't get the
point
of:
((WebApplication)getApplication()).unmount(cheeses);
((WebApplication)getApplication()).mountBookmarkablePage(cheeses,
CheeseDetailsPage.class);
((WebApplication)getApplication()).unmount(cheeses);
((WebApplication)getApplication()).mount(new
QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy(cheeses, CheeseDetailsPage.class));
((WebApplication)getApplication()).unmount(cheeses);
((WebApplication)getApplication()).mount(new
MixedParamUrlCodingStrategy(cheeses, CheeseDetailsPage.class, new
String[]{}));
why mount and unmount?
The exceptions are thrown after the first on timer event.
QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy gives:
Root cause:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.BookmarkableListenerInterfaceRequestTarget.processEvents(BookmarkableListenerInterfaceRequestTarget.java:131)
at
org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.processEvents(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:90)
at
org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:1166)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1241)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1316)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:493)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:354)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:194)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
at
Re: generics
the question here is: do most people use the model in the Link or not?
when you use compound property model in conjunction with form
components you never call getmodel/object() on those either. what now?
not generify form components? i dont think a strict criteria will
work.
some components fall into a gray area which needs to be discussed and
generified on case by case basis. when i was generifying wicket my
primary usecase is to use Link with a model so i went that way. start
a discussion/vote and see where that goes in a different thread. i
will be happy to go with what the majority thinks in this particular
case.
-igor
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Sven Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to leave the generic part to this reusable link then?
Why 'pollute' all links with a generic parameter?
Back to your definition:
(1) only components that use their model have a generic type
(components you are likely to call getmodel/getmodelobject on as a
user).
What now? Components that use their model *or* you're likely to call
getmodel on? Seems to me as two different things:
Link doesn't fit in the first category nor is it always used with a model.
Sven
Igor Vaynberg schrieb:
if your link is anonymous, yes. if you have reusable links in their
own class, then no.
-igor
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Joni Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't this a same thing:
onPopulateItem(final ItemUser item) {
add(new Link(delete) {
protected void onClick() { service.delete(item.getModelObject()); }
});
}
Joni
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:56 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
onPopulateItem(ItemUser item) {
add(new LinkUser(delete, item.getModel()) {
protected void onClick() { service.delete(getModelObject()); }
});
}
-igor
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Rodolfo Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I too like this compromise alot
Although I don't see a good use case for generifying Link ?
Am I missing something?
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Timo Rantalaiho
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
since no one complained, should we apply this change over the
weekend?
and soon thereafter release m3?
I prefer this over M2. Even though:
user). so far these are link,form,formcomponent
Link might be better without the type parameter. It's no big
deal though.
And yes, it would be good if for example Johan and Gerolf
who have invested a lot of effort on the generification
could have a closer look and tell what they think before
proceeding.
Best wishes,
Timo
--
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AjaxLink in a DataView causing issues when loading multiple instance of the page
Thanks for the follow up Maurice, so i just checked for AutomaticMultiWindowSupport and turns out its not turn on, now what does that signify, shouldnt it be turned out automatically ? Also just for info, havent really changed any setting relating to the session-store and using whatever is configured to be used by default... Also let me add, that this problem doesnt occur if i use the QueryStringURLCodingStrategy() (not sure about other strategies)..and thats what i changed too, as a workaround to make it work for the time being, but then i starting facing yet another problem with QSUCS (i.e. AjaxLink causes an exception on clicking them once the session has expired) which i have pointed in this thread (http://www.nabble.com/self-refreshing-table-with-effects-to15545179.html), and have created a JIRA issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1724. Would appreciate any input... Thanks in advance.. Mr Mean wrote: This sounds like your page is living in the default pagemap where there should be a pagemap for each tab/window each with thee own instance of the page. can you confirm IPageSettings.getAutomaticMultiWindowSupport is on? If so you could take a look at WebPage$PageMapChecker and WebPage.onNewBrowserWindow to see what might be causing the auto detection to fail. HybridUrlCodingStrategy.encode and decode might also shed some light on this matter. Finally http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/page-maps.html hopefully contains some useful information even though i think it is for wicket 1.2 I never had much to deal with the pagemap myself but hopefully you can use the information above as a starting point in your search for a solution. Or maybe someone else can shed some more light on this. Maurice On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:34 AM, mfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To me the problem seems to be related to the hybridUrlCoding strategy (where the same page instance is reloaded when the user tries to open up a new tab/window by doing right-click on AjaxLink) and the DataView which gets re-rendered everytime (irrespective of the urlcodingstrategy), resulting in a new instance of each items in it and similarly a new ajaxlink for each item, so with that the page-component heirarchy for that version changes, whereas the first-tab/window is still displaying the dataview-items which are not in the component-heirarchy anymore and hence the Component Not Found on Page exception. Am looking for some feedback from the experts, i am in a bit of time crunch here, and have a release coming pretty soon.. Thanks in advance... mfs wrote: Let me add a couple of things here, 1) Page-Versioning has not been turned off. 2) Using HybridURLCodingStrategy to render the page. Opinions please.. mfs wrote: Hi Guys, I am facing a problem with the usage of AjaxLink within a DataView. The dataview is contained in a container since the DataView is updated on ajaxform.submit. The AjaxLink is on each Item of the DataView, which opens up a modal window (with a panel as the content) with further details of each item listed in the DV. Everything works fine, unless the user tries to open up the same Page (containing the above components) in another window/tab, which apparently results in the wicket component tree getting out of sync with the actual DOM, and hence clicking the ajaxlink on the first window/tab results in the following exception...(must be obvious but just for info, if i do a refresh of the same page in the first tab/window, the ajaxlink would work fine) org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: component certificateDataViewContainer:certificateList:2:certificateSummaryLink not found on page company.wicket.product.page.CertificateSearchPage[id = 0], listener interface = [RequestListenerInterface name=IBehaviorListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.behavior.IBehaviorListener.onRequest()] at org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.resolveListenerInterfaceTarget(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:416) at org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.resolveRenderedPage(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:461) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycleProcessor.resolve(WebRequestCycleProcessor.java:139) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1246) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1366) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:499) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:387) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:199) at com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:623) at com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:370) at
RE: [PROPOSAL] Use path in URL when target is instance of BookmarkablePageRequestTarget
A possible added bonus to this that it *might* be possible to catch a session expired, and re-login to the bookmarkable page. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-PROPOSAL--Use-path-in-URL-when-target-is-instance-of-BookmarkablePageRequestTarget-tp18188845p18228914.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: generics
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008, Matej Knopp wrote: There is one thing that helped me quite a lot when migration the project I'm working out. I've created GenericPanel, GenericWebMarkupContainer and GenericFragment classes. In most cases the only change was renaming PanelMyClass to GenericPanelMyClass. Maybe the names could be TypedPanel / ModelContainingPanel or something like that? Or maybe start with the original component name so that they would pop up more easily in the IDE, for example PanelWithType / PanelWithModel? I was wondering, even though those classes were farily simple, we might want to include them in Wicket anyway, for the sake of consistency and convenience. I thought about this and I think that it might be better to not include them after all. In 1.5 it would be great to separate IModel and Component more thoroughly, getting rid of the defaultModel* accessors. Then it would make less sense to have the convenience classes with those model and modelObject accessors. In cases where two components share the same model, it would make sense to make the IModel field in each component final. Then setModel() does not make sense any more; all it could do would be throw an exception or be a confusing no-op. Likewise, sometimes you never do setModelObject() or getModelObject() from outside the class. Leaner APIs and less methods per objects are good things. Hence it's better to add methods as you need them, instead of providing a lot of convenience stuff that is only used a part of the time. Surely each Component subclass has anyway a lot of methods, and MarkupContainers even more, but you have got to start somewhere :) This is not a big deal though, either way is fine by me. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Follow up] Ajax link doesn't call event
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008, ezegb wrote: I ended up commenting loads of code and it turns out my Ajax link will quit responding if it has something else after itself in the form. I got rid of all the textfields that followed, and I got it to work. The troublesome component is actually the ajax link, plus a textfield to input data, plus a listview displaying that data (the ajax link updates the object and the listview) If you can provide a quickstart containing only the few necessary parts, others can try checking it it's a bug or if you can fix something in your code. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple links on screen, same link on page?
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008, Manuel Corrales wrote: Hi, i have a table and a couple of pagination controls (links). Is there a way of duplicate this links (i want the controls to be on top and bottom of the table) without having to add two times the same links on the page and without having to use different wicket:id for each link? Are you using your own components for these things, or some ready-made Wicket DataTables or such? I think that if you group the controls in their own component (WebMarkupContainer) you should be fine adding that twice with different ids, without the need to invent different wicket:id for each link. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IE/Safari - AjaxLink raises exception on Session-Expiry
Guys, I am facing this issue (with Safari/IE) with the usage of AjaxLink when used on a page mounted though any of the BookmarkablePageRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy extensions To be precise i get a NullPointerException (in BookmarkableListenerInterfaceRequestTarget.processEvents) when clicking the AjaxLink after the session-expiry has reached.. I have created this ticket with a quick-start (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1724), if anyone could please take a look into it.. The issue doesnt occur so Thanks in advance -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IE-Safari---AjaxLink-raises-exception-on-Session-Expiry-tp18229800p18229800.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IE/Safari - AjaxLink raises exception on Session-Expiry
Guys, I am facing this issue (with Safari/IE) with the usage of AjaxLink when used on a page mounted though any of the BookmarkablePageRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy extensions To be precise i get a NullPointerException (in BookmarkableListenerInterfaceRequestTarget.processEvents) when clicking the AjaxLink after the session-expiry has reached.. I have created this ticket with a quick-start (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1724), if someone could please take a look into it.. Thanks in advance -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IE-Safari---AjaxLink-raises-exception-on-Session-Expiry-tp18229807p18229807.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
configuring wicket:id from Java code in TITLE in a page
I am trying to have the title of a given page, populated from the code.
HTML:
==
html
head
titlewicket:id=mysiteName/title
/head
body
strongHomepage/strong
br /
br /
span wicket:id=messagemessage will be here/span
/body
/html
Java: (HomePage.java only)
=
public class HomePage extends WebPage {
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
// Add the simplest type of label
add(new Label(message, MESSAGE));
add(new Label(mysiteName, mysite));
// TODO Add your page's components here
}
static final String MESSAGE = If you see this message wicket is
properly configured and running;
}
I am getting the following error.
ERROR - RequestCycle - The component(s) below failed to
render. A common problem is that you have added a component in code
but forgot to reference it in the markup (thus the component will
never be rendered).
1. [Component id = mysiteName, page = pages.HomePage, path =
0:mysiteName.Label, isVisible = true, isVersioned = true]
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: The component(s) below
failed to render. A common problem is that you have added a component
in code but forgot to reference it in the markup (thus the component
will never be rendered).
1. [Component id = mysiteName, page = pages.HomePage, path =
0:mysiteName.Label, isVisible = true, isVersioned = true]
at org.apache.wicket.Page.checkRendering(Page.java:1115)
Can somebody help me here.
I am using this with Wicket 1.3.4 . (with Jetty engine).
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IE/Safari - AjaxLink raises exception on Session-Expiry
Let me also add that 1 out of 5 times, it works fine as expected, i.e. the SessionExpiry page is shown. mfs wrote: Guys, I am facing this issue (with Safari/IE) with the usage of AjaxLink when used on a page mounted though any of the BookmarkablePageRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy extensions To be precise i get a NullPointerException (in BookmarkableListenerInterfaceRequestTarget.processEvents) when clicking the AjaxLink after the session-expiry has reached.. I have created this ticket with a quick-start (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1724), if someone could please take a look into it.. Thanks in advance -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IE-Safari---AjaxLink-raises-exception-on-Session-Expiry-tp18229807p18229976.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL] Use path in URL when target is instance of BookmarkablePageRequestTarget
not unless you are planning on keeping any existing query params in the url for the duration of the entire session, a lot of bookmarkable pages need context. once again, i dont see what this offers over the hybrid strategy. -igor On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Ned Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A possible added bonus to this that it *might* be possible to catch a session expired, and re-login to the bookmarkable page. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-PROPOSAL--Use-path-in-URL-when-target-is-instance-of-BookmarkablePageRequestTarget-tp18188845p18228914.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: configuring wicket:id from Java code in TITLE in a page
title wicket:id=mysiteName[title will be here]/title
just like the span...
-igor
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Rakesh Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to have the title of a given page, populated from the code.
HTML:
==
html
head
titlewicket:id=mysiteName/title
/head
body
strongHomepage/strong
br /
br /
span wicket:id=messagemessage will be here/span
/body
/html
Java: (HomePage.java only)
=
public class HomePage extends WebPage {
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
// Add the simplest type of label
add(new Label(message, MESSAGE));
add(new Label(mysiteName, mysite));
// TODO Add your page's components here
}
static final String MESSAGE = If you see this message wicket is
properly configured and running;
}
I am getting the following error.
ERROR - RequestCycle - The component(s) below failed to
render. A common problem is that you have added a component in code
but forgot to reference it in the markup (thus the component will
never be rendered).
1. [Component id = mysiteName, page = pages.HomePage, path =
0:mysiteName.Label, isVisible = true, isVersioned = true]
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: The component(s) below
failed to render. A common problem is that you have added a component
in code but forgot to reference it in the markup (thus the component
will never be rendered).
1. [Component id = mysiteName, page = pages.HomePage, path =
0:mysiteName.Label, isVisible = true, isVersioned = true]
at org.apache.wicket.Page.checkRendering(Page.java:1115)
Can somebody help me here.
I am using this with Wicket 1.3.4 . (with Jetty engine).
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL] Use path in URL when target is instance of BookmarkablePageRequestTarget
once again, i dont see what this offers over the hybrid strategy. Maybe you can correct me if I'm wrong here... The hybrid stategy is only applied when the target is an IBookmarkablePageRequestTarget. So, for normal bookmarkable pages, there is no problem, like you say. The issue only arises when a page is mounted, but is used in a stateful way (for example it has a form or something). In that case, the target becomes an IListenerInterfaceRequestTarget. When this is the case, the hybrid strategy is not used. This is the case that the patch is intended for. -dml- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple links on screen, same link on page?
Yup dependancy on id's are in a hierachy:) Timo Rantalaiho wrote: On Tue, 01 Jul 2008, Manuel Corrales wrote: Hi, i have a table and a couple of pagination controls (links). Is there a way of duplicate this links (i want the controls to be on top and bottom of the table) without having to add two times the same links on the page and without having to use different wicket:id for each link? Are you using your own components for these things, or some ready-made Wicket DataTables or such? I think that if you group the controls in their own component (WebMarkupContainer) you should be fine adding that twice with different ids, without the need to invent different wicket:id for each link. Best wishes, Timo -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: configuring wicket:id from Java code in TITLE in a page
Thanks Igor. That works.
Thanks Apache Wicket team once again for a wonderful framework.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:37 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
title wicket:id=mysiteName[title will be here]/title
just like the span...
-igor
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Rakesh Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to have the title of a given page, populated from the code.
HTML:
==
html
head
titlewicket:id=mysiteName/title
/head
body
strongHomepage/strong
br /
br /
span wicket:id=messagemessage will be here/span
/body
/html
Java: (HomePage.java only)
=
public class HomePage extends WebPage {
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
// Add the simplest type of label
add(new Label(message, MESSAGE));
add(new Label(mysiteName, mysite));
// TODO Add your page's components here
}
static final String MESSAGE = If you see this message wicket is
properly configured and running;
}
I am getting the following error.
ERROR - RequestCycle - The component(s) below failed to
render. A common problem is that you have added a component in code
but forgot to reference it in the markup (thus the component will
never be rendered).
1. [Component id = mysiteName, page = pages.HomePage, path =
0:mysiteName.Label, isVisible = true, isVersioned = true]
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: The component(s) below
failed to render. A common problem is that you have added a component
in code but forgot to reference it in the markup (thus the component
will never be rendered).
1. [Component id = mysiteName, page = pages.HomePage, path =
0:mysiteName.Label, isVisible = true, isVersioned = true]
at org.apache.wicket.Page.checkRendering(Page.java:1115)
Can somebody help me here.
I am using this with Wicket 1.3.4 . (with Jetty engine).
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL] Use path in URL when target is instance of BookmarkablePageRequestTarget
I think stateless pages already do something like that. Also look at hybrid url encoding that also preserves the bookmarkable url and makes the url even prettier. On 6/30/08, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently, when a target is an instance of IListenerInterfaceRequestTarget, the URL gets mounted (so to speak) on the root of where the wicket application is located. So, if the servlet context path for the wicket application is set to /home/, then all targets (whether bookmarkable or not), are written as something like /home/?wicket:interface=:0. This works, but I think it somewhat defeats the purpose of having mounted pages. Rather, I think it would be better that when the target is an instance of BookmarkablePageRequestTarget, since we can get the target path easily, we should therefore write the URL to that target path, and not the application's root path. So, if I have a form on a page mounted at /home/myform, the above link gets rendered as /home/myform/?wicket:interface=:0 instead. Now, I perfectly understand that this type page has state, so is no longer bookmarkable. However, at least we can preserve the pretty URL aspect of the page, which IMO is the original intent. [On that topic, I notice that people often confuse the two related-but-different topics of pretty urls and bookmarkable pages. I wonder if there isn't a better way of formalising the two concepts so people get less confused... no ideas, just thinking out loud.] Anyway, I tried this out by modifying WebRequestCodingStrategy. The fix is quite simple and it appears to work without any problems. If you think this is a reasonable proposal, I will create an issue and submit my patch. Thank you! David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No effect of code until restarting netbeans.
I am a newuser using wicket. I have been facing this problem since a week. I'm in serious trouble. Whenever i make any changes in my code in netbeans the changes i have made doesn't works until i restart netbeans. After restarting my netbeans the changes that i have made in my code works. For e.g. If i have set as setResponsePage(Home.class) and later i change it to setResponsePage(Index.class) and save it. Now if i run my project than it still shows Home page until i restart netbeans. After i restart netbeans the problem is solved. I'm using netbeans 6.1 Please help me with this problem. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/No-effect-of-code-until-restarting-netbeans.-tp18211238p18211238.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strange stack trace in logs
Hello,
I've put my wicket app in production for a bit more than a month now.
Yesterday, I tried to see what is in the logs. I see a lot of stacktrace
like this:
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Internal error parsing
wicket:interface = :57:container1:link1
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.WebRequestCodingStrategy.addInterfaceParameters(WebRequestCodingStrategy.java:583)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.WebRequestCodingStrategy.addInterfaceParameters(WebRequestCodingStrategy.java:554)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.WebRequestCodingStrategy.decode(WebRequestCodingStrategy.java:199)
at org.apache.wicket.Request.getRequestParameters(Request.java:171)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1224)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1316)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:493)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:354)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:194)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:215)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:188)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:213)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:174)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127)
at
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:117)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:108)
at
org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:174)
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:874)
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java:665)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:528)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:81)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:689)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
But I'm not able to reproduce it...
My Wicket code looks like this:
1- DefaultPage.java
public abstract class DefaultPage extends WebPage {
public DefaultPage() {
WebMarkupContainer container1=...;
Link link1 = ...;
link1.add(new Image(link1, new
ResourceReference(DefaultPage.class, link1.png,
getSession().getLocale(), null)));
}
}
2- Index.java
public class Index extends DefaultPage { ... }
May it be a back button issue? Must I put some code on the
onBeforeRender to refresh the resource references?
Any idea are welcome ;)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More on wicket url stratergy
In my itemList class I set the response page like this. setResponsePage( new ItemPage( parameters, ItemListPage.this ) ); Now the ItemListPage.this is for back travelling and to get the background from the list class. Is it possible to make the itemPage bookmarkable? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/More-on-wicket-url-stratergy-tp18212748p18212748.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More on wicket url stratergy
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 02:50 -0700, Mathias P.W Nilsson wrote: In my itemList class I set the response page like this. setResponsePage( new ItemPage( parameters, ItemListPage.this ) ); Now the ItemListPage.this is for back travelling and to get the background from the list class. Is it possible to make the itemPage bookmarkable? Sure, but you can no longer construct the object yourself. You'll need to do this instead: setResponsePage( ItemListPage.class, parameters ); - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No effect of code until restarting netbeans.
Are you running in debug mode? Did you try to restart the server? On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Sushant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am a newuser using wicket. I have been facing this problem since a week. I'm in serious trouble. Whenever i make any changes in my code in netbeans the changes i have made doesn't works until i restart netbeans. After restarting my netbeans the changes that i have made in my code works. For e.g. If i have set as setResponsePage(Home.class) and later i change it to setResponsePage(Index.class) and save it. Now if i run my project than it still shows Home page until i restart netbeans. After i restart netbeans the problem is solved. I'm using netbeans 6.1 Please help me with this problem. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/No-effect-of-code-until-restarting-netbeans.-tp18211238p18211238.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No effect of code until restarting netbeans.
You have to make the project to compile the changed classes. Martijn On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Thomas Mäder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you running in debug mode? Did you try to restart the server? On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Sushant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am a newuser using wicket. I have been facing this problem since a week. I'm in serious trouble. Whenever i make any changes in my code in netbeans the changes i have made doesn't works until i restart netbeans. After restarting my netbeans the changes that i have made in my code works. For e.g. If i have set as setResponsePage(Home.class) and later i change it to setResponsePage(Index.class) and save it. Now if i run my project than it still shows Home page until i restart netbeans. After i restart netbeans the problem is solved. I'm using netbeans 6.1 Please help me with this problem. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/No-effect-of-code-until-restarting-netbeans.-tp18211238p18211238.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: generics
There is one thing that helped me quite a lot when migration the project I'm working out. I've created GenericPanel, GenericWebMarkupContainer and GenericFragment classes. In most cases the only change was renaming PanelMyClass to GenericPanelMyClass. I was wondering, even though those classes were farily simple, we might want to include them in Wicket anyway, for the sake of consistency and convenience. -Matej On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i looked through the code and it is fine by me. Lets test this then in a Build and see what people think of this. On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: unit tests are fixed... -igor On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm guessing somewhere this week or so. We need to flush out the unit test failures and get some preliminary feedback. Also we need to have time available to actually build the release. My time is limited because we're in the final stages before publishing and I have to read our book twice or so. Martijn On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:36 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What sort of time frame are we looking at for a release with this new generics paradigm? On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Sven Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've just converted two projects to the new generics setup and everything worked out nicely. I think this is how generics should be applied to Wicket. Igor, thanks for your hard work on this. wasnt just me :) -igor Sven Igor Vaynberg schrieb: development of the 1.4 branch has been quiet lately, this is because the core team has been busy working on an alternative way of generifiing the framework. an early result of that effort can be found here [1]. The key difference in [1] is that we have decoupled the component from the type of the model. here is the list of major differences: (1) only components that use their model have a generic type (components you are likely to call getmodel/getmodelobject on as a user). so far these are link,form,formcomponent subclasses,listview,listitem,(other repeaters will follow soon). this allows for typesafety where it makes sense, and eliminates a ton of noise from code. we will generify others upon request if a good usecase is provided and we think it is widely applicable. (2) non-generified components do not have IModelT get/setModel and T get/setModelObject, instead they have IModel?get/setDefaultModel and Object get/setDefaultModelObject. this clearly expresses that the default component model is not tied to the type of component. this is a bit of a pain from the code migration point of view, but we think is worth the effort. generifyed components are free to implement the old IModelT get/setModel, etc, but have to keep the unsafe cast inside. see ListItem for an example. basically we feel this is a much cleaner way then what is 1.4m2. this is a call for confirmation/discussion from our user base. do try to port a small project or a part of a larger project you are working on to the [1] branch to see how the new api feels. if we do like this more the new branch will be merged into what will be 1.4m3. [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/ivaynberg/generics -igor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More on wicket url stratergy
Thanks, but this what not what I meant My ItemPage takes the ItemListPage as a parameter in the constructor so that I can go back to the exact location I were before. Now If I want to use the Item as a bookmarkable page, how can this be achieved with a reference to ItemListPage? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/More-on-wicket-url-stratergy-tp18212748p18214136.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
patterns for web ui apps. mvc models
Hi guys, I've been thinking about the way in which wicket is an MVC framework and whether people use it according to the MVC pattern. Wikipedia has this to say: Model The domain-specific representation of the information on which the application operates. Domain logic adds meaning to raw data (e.g., calculating if today is the user's birthday, or the totals, taxes, and shipping charges for shopping cart items). Many applications use a persistent storage mechanism (such as a database) to store data. MVC does not specifically mention the data access layer because it is understood to be underneath or encapsulated by the Model. View Renders the model into a form suitable for interaction, typically a user interface element. Multiple views can exist for a single model for different purposes. Controller Processes and responds to events, typically user actions, and may invoke changes on the model. I'm interested in whether people are using the model to encapsulate service calls. In the wicket documentation I frequently see services in the page retrieving dtos and passing the dto to a component as a model. This seems to be in conflict with the description of a model in the mvc pattern. Wicket is supposed to be an mvc framework, so why do the examples put services/daos in the pages? What patterns are folks using for their wicket apps? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/patterns-for-web-ui-apps.--mvc-models-tp18214140p18214140.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HeaderContributer for a title
Hi, Is there a special header contributer for title/title ? -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74 P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary
Re: HeaderContributer for a title
nope. just use: title wicket:id=title/title add(new Label(title, Hello, World!)); On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is there a special header contributer for title/title ? -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74 P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HeaderContributer for a title
yeah, but what if I have a markup inheritance? I then must use wicket:head ... don't I ? On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: nope. just use: title wicket:id=title/title add(new Label(title, Hello, World!)); On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is there a special header contributer for title/title ? -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74 P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74 P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary
Re: Client side validation
Do any of the core validators actually implement this interface?
I have an issue filed in JIRA for the StringValidator.maximumLength()
validator to append the maxlength HTML attribute to form components.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1310
This seems like a perfect place to implement this feature.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's why we introduced IValidatorAddListener in the past if I
remember correctly. I validator that implements IValidatorAddListener
can add behaviors in the onAdded method, so it is already possible to
design validators that take care of both server- and client side
validation.
Javadocs from that class:
public interface IValidatorAddListener extends IClusterable
{
/**
* Called right after a validator is added to a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Form} or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FormComponent}. A common
* use case for implementing this interface is for validators to add
behaviors to implement
* client-side validation capabilities, e.g. through JavaScript,
Ajax
or just by adding a simple
* attribute modifier that sets a maxlength attribute.
*
* @param component
*a codeComponent/code to which the validator was
just added
*/
void onAdded(Component component);
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HeaderContributer for a title
only if you define the title wicket:id=foo/title in your sub pages. Martijn On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeah, but what if I have a markup inheritance? I then must use wicket:head ... don't I ? On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: nope. just use: title wicket:id=title/title add(new Label(title, Hello, World!)); On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is there a special header contributer for title/title ? -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74 P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74 P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HeaderContributer for a title
I like to do this in my base page:
title wicket:id=titlefoo/title
protected IModel getPageTitleModel() {
return new ResourceModel(getClass().getSimpleName());
}
add(new Label(title, new AbstractReadOnlyModel() {
public Object getObject() {
return getPageTitleModel().getObject();
}
}));
The AbstractReadOnlyModel is there to ensure I'm not calling the
overrideable getPageTitleModel() from my base class constructor.
By default my page titles come from my application's .properties file,
like this:
UserPage=User
ClientPage=Client
I re-use these labels when creating links to the same page. Of course, I
can override getPageTitleModel() to return a custom title when needed.
jk
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 03:36:45PM +0300, Eyal Golan wrote:
yeah, but what if I have a markup inheritance?
I then must use wicket:head ... don't I ?
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
nope. just use:
title wicket:id=title/title
add(new Label(title, Hello, World!));
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a special header contributer for title/title ?
--
Eyal Golan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74
P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really
necessary
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Eyal Golan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74
P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL] Use path in URL when target is instance of BookmarkablePageRequestTarget
none of this is 1.4 -igor On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:50 PM, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 08:48 +0200, Johan Compagner wrote: I think stateless pages already do something like that. Also look at hybrid url encoding that also preserves the bookmarkable url and makes the url even prettier. That's possible. I haven't yet made my way into 1.4 waters yet. -dml- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: patterns for web ui apps. mvc models
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:07 AM, marco m [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wicket is supposed to be an mvc framework, so why do the examples put services/daos in the pages? it is? that is big news to me. -igor What patterns are folks using for their wicket apps? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/patterns-for-web-ui-apps.--mvc-models-tp18214140p18214140.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: patterns for web ui apps. mvc models
Wicket is a framework to write (mostly) statefulweb pages. Unlike other web frameworks it does not impose a particular way to structure the application logic beyond that. Think of it like, say, the QT widget set. It's a way to display information and to be notified of user interactions. Thomas PS: when did the notion start that design pattens had an intrinsic value? Now new and improved with more patterns! Patterns are ways to structure code WHEN IT NEEDS STRUCTURING. A HelloWorld app DOES NOT NEED PATTERNS. (sorry for the shouting, pet peeve) On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:07 PM, marco m [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, I've been thinking about the way in which wicket is an MVC framework and whether people use it according to the MVC pattern. Wikipedia has this to say: Model The domain-specific representation of the information on which the application operates. Domain logic adds meaning to raw data (e.g., calculating if today is the user's birthday, or the totals, taxes, and shipping charges for shopping cart items). Many applications use a persistent storage mechanism (such as a database) to store data. MVC does not specifically mention the data access layer because it is understood to be underneath or encapsulated by the Model. View Renders the model into a form suitable for interaction, typically a user interface element. Multiple views can exist for a single model for different purposes. Controller Processes and responds to events, typically user actions, and may invoke changes on the model. I'm interested in whether people are using the model to encapsulate service calls. In the wicket documentation I frequently see services in the page retrieving dtos and passing the dto to a component as a model. This seems to be in conflict with the description of a model in the mvc pattern. Wicket is supposed to be an mvc framework, so why do the examples put services/daos in the pages? What patterns are folks using for their wicket apps? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/patterns-for-web-ui-apps.--mvc-models-tp18214140p18214140.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: patterns for web ui apps. mvc models
if it doesnt have patterns how will the enterprise architect be able to model it -igor On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Thomas Mäder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wicket is a framework to write (mostly) statefulweb pages. Unlike other web frameworks it does not impose a particular way to structure the application logic beyond that. Think of it like, say, the QT widget set. It's a way to display information and to be notified of user interactions. Thomas PS: when did the notion start that design pattens had an intrinsic value? Now new and improved with more patterns! Patterns are ways to structure code WHEN IT NEEDS STRUCTURING. A HelloWorld app DOES NOT NEED PATTERNS. (sorry for the shouting, pet peeve) On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:07 PM, marco m [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, I've been thinking about the way in which wicket is an MVC framework and whether people use it according to the MVC pattern. Wikipedia has this to say: Model The domain-specific representation of the information on which the application operates. Domain logic adds meaning to raw data (e.g., calculating if today is the user's birthday, or the totals, taxes, and shipping charges for shopping cart items). Many applications use a persistent storage mechanism (such as a database) to store data. MVC does not specifically mention the data access layer because it is understood to be underneath or encapsulated by the Model. View Renders the model into a form suitable for interaction, typically a user interface element. Multiple views can exist for a single model for different purposes. Controller Processes and responds to events, typically user actions, and may invoke changes on the model. I'm interested in whether people are using the model to encapsulate service calls. In the wicket documentation I frequently see services in the page retrieving dtos and passing the dto to a component as a model. This seems to be in conflict with the description of a model in the mvc pattern. Wicket is supposed to be an mvc framework, so why do the examples put services/daos in the pages? What patterns are folks using for their wicket apps? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/patterns-for-web-ui-apps.--mvc-models-tp18214140p18214140.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ajax link doesn't call event
Hi, the situation is as follows: I have a form embedded in an abstract panel. The form has an autocompletetextfield and an AjaxSubmitLink which acts on the data in the textfield. The panel, in turn, extends several other panels which are in the end the ones that get instantiated. The very code for the AjaxSubmitLink is used elsewhere and works fine. Now, the issue is that when called on this panel, it won't call its onSubmit event. It won't call any other onSubmit event, either. I am certain the code is placed in a class extending Form on the Java side, and it's certainly enclosed by form in the markup. I'm at a total loss with this situation, since it does work in the very same page (the final page has two forms, the first one works perfectly, the second -this one- does not). Any help will be most appreciated. Thanks, Ezequiel -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ajax-link-doesn%27t-call-event-tp18219220p18219220.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Client side validation
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do any of the core validators actually implement this interface? Not yet I think, but it's never to late :-) Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No effect of code until restarting netbeans.
Use Undeploy and Deploy on your EAR or WAR... On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Sushant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am a newuser using wicket. I have been facing this problem since a week. I'm in serious trouble. Whenever i make any changes in my code in netbeans the changes i have made doesn't works until i restart netbeans. After restarting my netbeans the changes that i have made in my code works. For e.g. If i have set as setResponsePage(Home.class) and later i change it to setResponsePage(Index.class) and save it. Now if i run my project than it still shows Home page until i restart netbeans. After i restart netbeans the problem is solved. I'm using netbeans 6.1 Please help me with this problem. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/No-effect-of-code-until-restarting-netbeans.-tp18211238p18211238.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
