thanks for your quick replay . so the situation as it is now is :
i have managed to call the forms submit by the following java script :
StringBuffer config = new StringBuffer();
int i = ns.getAutoRefreshSecsConversation();
config.append(script language=\JavaScript\);
config.append(function
[X] - YES, please create a branch in the Wicket Stuff repo just for
abandoned projects and move wicket-contrib-gmap into that branch.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--End-of-Life-wicket-contrib-gmap--tp20726039p20758844.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list
Great work! Its really looking good!
Two more suggestions:
1. Add the maven-jetty-plugin the the root pom. It would be nice if
'mvn jetty:run' works for all the examples.
2. Remove all eclipse projects (.project .classpath) from svn and add
the 'maven-eclipse-plugin' to the root
I agree with both of those. I'm not real sure either regarding the etiquette -
that's been my dilemna throughout. That's the reason I started so many vote
threads. I think both of those things would be acceptable, though. A common
build setup was the goal of this. I'd like to also see us
Check:
http://wicketstuff.org/jira/browse/WSYUI-6
(YUI seemed like the best option... no 'core' project exists)
This also adds a logging implementation so the tinymce-examples runs
with jetty:run
I don't have commit access on wicketstuff, so I can't directly apply
the patch :)
As for
Anyone tried using wicket with the YUI uploader?
http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/uploader/
http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/examples/uploader/uploader-advanced-queue_clean.html
This uses a flash object to select files and post them -- all the
progress is handled on the client side rather then
El jue, 27-11-2008 a las 15:54 -0600, Jeremy Thomerson escribió:
I am beginning the WS reorg as noted in previous emails. You can monitor
progress here:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-core/
As we move projects into the wicketstuff-core, I
Hello,
I'm writing an web application using Spring, Wicket and Hibernate. It's the
first time I use this technologies, so forgive me if my question is trivial.
In my application i have a many to one relationship between Hotel and Room.
On admin panel I'd like to have possibility to edit Hotel
[X] - YES - I would like consistent naming
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Martin Grigorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
El jue, 27-11-2008 a las 15:54 -0600, Jeremy Thomerson escribió:
I am beginning the WS reorg as noted in previous emails. You can monitor
progress here:
go to wicketinaction.com and search for smart entity model
also read the wiki page called models, especially detachable models secton.
-igor
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 2:40 PM, blekit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm writing an web application using Spring, Wicket and Hibernate. It's the
Hello,
thanks for link to the article - it was very interesting. However, I still
don't see clear connection between this case and my problem - I use my own
DomainObjectModel which extends LoadableDetachableModel (and after reading
once more the section about them i still can't see any mistakes
Hi,
I am using GridView and PagingNavigator to render a series of podcast elements
in my database.
I am using wickets 1.3.5 with Hibernate and Tomcat.
The first page renders fine but in trying to navigate using the Paging
Navigator - It looks like the state is lost and I get the following
final Room r = (Room) m.getObject();
item.add(new TextField(costPerNight,
new PropertyModel(r,
costPerNight)));
there you are binding your model directly to the object thus keeping a
reference, instead
new
Well, that of course worked - as I wrote earlier I'm very grateful.
Thank you very much for your help once again.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
final Room r = (Room) m.getObject();
item.add(new TextField(costPerNight,
new PropertyModel(r,
MarkupContainer's children field is declared as an Object and can refer to
a ChildList - which is a List, hopefully (until it's genericised) of
Components,
an Object[] - again, hopefully of Components,
a Component - ie a single child, or, even
a ComponentSourceEntry - a bare-bones
The only problem right now is the cast to Component[]. The fix is
easy, just change it to Object[]. The optimization makes a lot of
sense and there is reason why it can't really be simple.
-Matej
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:29 AM, jWeekend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MarkupContainer's children field
Hi-
Is there any interest in making inmethod grid generic?
I have a half-way implementation that makes IDataSourceT -- it does
not make IQueryResult generic though.
Is there anywhere to attach patches for inmethod-grid? I don't see
anything on:
17 matches
Mail list logo
