I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2017
For this proposed new feature, I think wicket-extensions would be a best
place.
- Valentine Wu
Jeremy Thomerson-5 wrote:
>
> Oh, and if you want to add it to wicket stuff, just ask here for commit
> rights by supplying your SF ID.
>
Yes. It is similar. But I didn't look at the source code of the ModalWindow.
The idea I have put in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2017.
- Valentine
Daniele Dellafiore wrote:
>
> It seems like the mechanism of "blur" that happens to background
> openign the modal window.
>
> An
Hi Martijn,
So the only solution is to move the inner forms to be no longer 'inner'?
Thanks
J
Jeremy2009 wrote:
>
> Hi Martijn,
>
> Thanks for your super-fast reply.
>
> According to the Wicket Ajax Debugger, it says "INFO: focus set on
> userTagsCons144" - which is the 2nd inner form's text
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Valentine2008
wrote:
>
> I created a reusable component, PanelWithAjaxBusyIndicatingMask, which
> extends Panel.
>
> The functions it has:
>
> It will add a transparent mask layer to the current page to prevent further
> UI interactivity when there are any busy Aja
In addition, the iframe method that Ed mentioned was a hack to get
around the fact that AJAX can't handle fileuploads yet. That might
have been what he was talking about.
cheers.
On 10/01/2009, at 5:06 AM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Yes - a FileUpload can be in any component (though it will
I use a non-intrusive javascript snipplet which requires nothing else
from the server side and it works with or without Wicket...:
css:
#busy-symbol { position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 0px; margin: 0px;
width: 100%; z-index: 10; background: url(../images/raster.png)
repeat; cursor: wait; }
#
