Re: Like to override normal page mapping but setResponsePage(...) is final
Hi Igor, thanks.
Yeah, there is no other choice given the final methods. A bit of a shame
really, as having this work uniformly will depend on us all remembering
to do this instead of simply calling setResponse() directly.
Just out of interest, does anyone know why this method is final?
Cheers - Steve
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
setResponsePage(MyApplicaton.getCustomizedPageXClass(), .., ..)
-igor
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Steve Flasby st...@flasby.org wrote:
Chaps,
We have a requirement to customize certain pages depending on the
installation. My approach is to subclass the pages needing customization
and put the difference in the subclass. Then a bit of installation
specific config overrides the normal destination page and returns a
different one.
This seems an OK approach (other approaches happily received) but
requires that I be able to intercept calls to the original page with
calls to the subclassed version.
I was going to implement a subclass of RequestCycle to lookup the requested
page and use the subclass if my configuration specifies one. That way there
is no change needed in the rest of the application when we decide to use
a modified page.
new WebRequestCycle(this, (WebRequest)request, (WebResponse)response){
public C extends Page void setResponsePage(final ClassC pageClass,
final PageParameters pageParameters,
final String pageMapName) {
// finds configured alternative or returns same pageClass if nothing
// configured for this page.
ClassC altClass = getPageFactory().getPage(pageClass);
super.setResponsePage( altClass, pageParameters, pageMapName);
}
};
Unfortunately, setResponsePage(...) is final so I cant. This makes
me think I am approaching this wrong as whenever I find I am blocked
doing something in Wicket it's usually because I am going the wrong way.
I'm using 1.4RC2.
Can anyone offer an alternative for me please.
Cheers - Steve
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Like to override normal page mapping but setResponsePage(...) is final
it is final because we like to keep internals locked up so we can
easily change them even during minor version upgrades. if we make the
method overridable we are defining a certain contract which we do not
want to support.
to you it may seem like a shame, but people who read your code will
probably think otherwise as they will not be left wondering why they
are seeing a different page. a matter of taste i suppose.
-igor
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Steve Flasby st...@flasby.org wrote:
Hi Igor, thanks.
Yeah, there is no other choice given the final methods. A bit of a shame
really, as having this work uniformly will depend on us all remembering
to do this instead of simply calling setResponse() directly.
Just out of interest, does anyone know why this method is final?
Cheers - Steve
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
setResponsePage(MyApplicaton.getCustomizedPageXClass(), .., ..)
-igor
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Steve Flasby st...@flasby.org wrote:
Chaps,
We have a requirement to customize certain pages depending on the
installation. My approach is to subclass the pages needing customization
and put the difference in the subclass. Then a bit of installation
specific config overrides the normal destination page and returns a
different one.
This seems an OK approach (other approaches happily received) but
requires that I be able to intercept calls to the original page with
calls to the subclassed version.
I was going to implement a subclass of RequestCycle to lookup the
requested
page and use the subclass if my configuration specifies one. That way
there
is no change needed in the rest of the application when we decide to use
a modified page.
new WebRequestCycle(this, (WebRequest)request, (WebResponse)response){
public C extends Page void setResponsePage(final ClassC pageClass,
final PageParameters pageParameters,
final String pageMapName) {
// finds configured alternative or returns same pageClass if nothing
// configured for this page.
ClassC altClass = getPageFactory().getPage(pageClass);
super.setResponsePage( altClass, pageParameters, pageMapName);
}
};
Unfortunately, setResponsePage(...) is final so I cant. This makes
me think I am approaching this wrong as whenever I find I am blocked
doing something in Wicket it's usually because I am going the wrong way.
I'm using 1.4RC2.
Can anyone offer an alternative for me please.
Cheers - Steve
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: best way to add tooltips in wicket
Hi Nino, regarding Mootip, to sum up what i've noted: 1. while i think Mootip looks better than prototip, i felt that it seemed, well, slower. Basically, when you move the mouse around mootip updates less frequently and thus appears glitchier than prototip. 2. Another thing was that i couldn't see that it was possible to create a MooTip without a header. To point to a specific place in the code, I couldn't see that there was a way to set the addTitle boolean to false. This makes all tooltip to have a header and body segment even when there's no header text, which is not optimal. These points, mostly point 2, made me pick prototip. Now, with the quirks with prototip i mentioned in another post, I might have to make another pass at picking the framework to use... *sigh*. At least some nice folks here have given me some pointers, thanks for that. Cheers/Mathias nino martinez wael wrote: Please do tell if there are any issues with mootip, do not hesitate to write me (i'll be using it soon).. Im not soo keen todo stuff with prototip, since it's commercial license as of the latest version.. 2009/5/4 Mathias Nilsson wicket.program...@gmail.com: yes I have the same exact problem. Tried all settings there is in ProtoTip. The only thing that worked was to have onclick to show the tip and close button but this is of course not the way we want it. If you come up with a solution please post it here. Do you experience the same bug with MooTip? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/best-way-to-add-tooltips-in-wicket-tp22697930p23371425.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/best-way-to-add-tooltips-in-wicket-tp22697930p23401104.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Like to override normal page mapping but setResponsePage(...) is final
Mmm, you are right.
One of my complaints about gadgets like Spring is that it does things by
magic configured somewhere in an XML wonderland. It's better to keep it
explicit. I will shut up now.
Thanks, Igor.
Cheers - Steve
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
it is final because we like to keep internals locked up so we can
easily change them even during minor version upgrades. if we make the
method overridable we are defining a certain contract which we do not
want to support.
to you it may seem like a shame, but people who read your code will
probably think otherwise as they will not be left wondering why they
are seeing a different page. a matter of taste i suppose.
-igor
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Steve Flasby st...@flasby.org wrote:
Hi Igor, thanks.
Yeah, there is no other choice given the final methods. A bit of a shame
really, as having this work uniformly will depend on us all remembering
to do this instead of simply calling setResponse() directly.
Just out of interest, does anyone know why this method is final?
Cheers - Steve
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
setResponsePage(MyApplicaton.getCustomizedPageXClass(), .., ..)
-igor
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Steve Flasby st...@flasby.org wrote:
Chaps,
We have a requirement to customize certain pages depending on the
installation. My approach is to subclass the pages needing customization
and put the difference in the subclass. Then a bit of installation
specific config overrides the normal destination page and returns a
different one.
This seems an OK approach (other approaches happily received) but
requires that I be able to intercept calls to the original page with
calls to the subclassed version.
I was going to implement a subclass of RequestCycle to lookup the
requested
page and use the subclass if my configuration specifies one. That way
there
is no change needed in the rest of the application when we decide to use
a modified page.
new WebRequestCycle(this, (WebRequest)request, (WebResponse)response){
public C extends Page void setResponsePage(final ClassC pageClass,
final PageParameters pageParameters,
final String pageMapName) {
// finds configured alternative or returns same pageClass if nothing
// configured for this page.
ClassC altClass = getPageFactory().getPage(pageClass);
super.setResponsePage( altClass, pageParameters, pageMapName);
}
};
Unfortunately, setResponsePage(...) is final so I cant. This makes
me think I am approaching this wrong as whenever I find I am blocked
doing something in Wicket it's usually because I am going the wrong way.
I'm using 1.4RC2.
Can anyone offer an alternative for me please.
Cheers - Steve
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
How to manipulate values in a data table?
Hey, I have a message class that has a status (which it is an integer) to indicate whether the message has been sent successfully. Inside a data table, how to handle this integer values so instead of displaying 0 or 1, it displays Sent or Not Sent? Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to manipulate values in a data table?
Turn it into an object with that status as an integer and a name as String? Then the toString should return the name. You could possibly even use an enum. Linda HHB wrote: Hey, I have a message class that has a status (which it is an integer) to indicate whether the message has been sent successfully. Inside a data table, how to handle this integer values so instead of displaying 0 or 1, it displays Sent or Not Sent? Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.325 / Virus Database: 270.12.18/2096 - Release Date: 05/04/09 17:51:00 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DropDownChoice with ChoiceRender problem
But still. In this case the map is constant. What when the values is fetched from db. Are you going to call tha db every time you want to get the displayname? Jens -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DropDownChoice-with-ChoiceRender-problem-tp23374394p23401547.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to manipulate values in a data table?
Use a class to represent this and then add a customized ConverterLocator to your Application. I find the ConverterLocator very powerful, you get consistent rendering across the entire application without having to do anything special. Hope this helps. Cheers - Steve HHB wrote: Hey, I have a message class that has a status (which it is an integer) to indicate whether the message has been sent successfully. Inside a data table, how to handle this integer values so instead of displaying 0 or 1, it displays Sent or Not Sent? Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
FW: need help urgent......Change label dynamicly
Hello,
I want to change the Label for the AjaxButton, when it is clicked. Iam
not able to work out this.
new AjaxButton(preview){
public void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form form){
// need to get the label name here...how to get the label name?
if(AjaxButton.label.equal(click)) then set label to Unclick
if UnClick then show click
}
Need urgently, stopping my work. Could you please give me hint, how to
do this Implementation.
Thanks,
Praveen
---BeginMessage---
Hello,
I want to change the Label for the AjaxButton, when it is clicked. Iam not
able to work out this.
new AjaxButton(preview){
public void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form form){
if(AjaxButton.label.equal(click)) then set label to Unclick
if UnClick then show click
}
Need urgently, stopping my work. Could you please give me hint, how to do this.
Implementation.
Thanks,
Praveen
---End Message---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: unsubcribe
No worries... get well soon and then unsubscribe properly :) Martijn On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Clint Popetz cl...@42lines.net wrote: Oh, the shame. My only excuse is that the drugs for a sickness were stronger than expected, and I shouldn't have been typing then (or now, likely.) My apologies nonetheless. -Clint On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Clint Popetz cpop...@gmail.com wrote: unsubscribe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: remember me at login page feature
this is the problem descirbed in first letter:
I can't
change this behavior, because this check:
...
if
(!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn()
...
Is place
in final method of AuthenticatedWebSession.
:)
Well..
darn ... then do not call and check the cookie :)
if
(!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn()
(!myOwnCookieCheck()))
{
:...
}
**
Martin
2009/5/6 Khlystov
Alexandr a...@ovservice.org:
Thanks for reply, Martin.
AuthenticatedWebSession#isSignedIn() is final too :). And according to
design I think it is not the proper place to do the auto-login
logic.
http://people.apache.org/~tobrien/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/authentication/AuthenticatedWebSession.html#isSignedIn()
All you need to do is evaluate
the cookie here:
if
(!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn())
Meaning that this should return TRUE if cookie is
found.
**
Martin
2009/5/5 Khlystov
Alexandr a...@ovservice.org:
Hello
all.
Previous
answers did not helped me much.
Though thanks authors for
their
replies.
I am going to provide more detailed question:
My App extends
AuthenticatedWebApplication {
And I want to implement auto-login/remember me feature.
More precisely - when user submits to browser URL for
some
Wicket page
(and
user is not yet logged in) he
should be
able to see this page without
seeing
SignInPage (if he set at previous session
remember me check
box at
SignInPage).
I can't
understand how can I achive that with the
AuthenticatedWebApplication. How can I
handle redirecting user to the
SignInPage at
org.apache.wicket.authentication;AuthenticatedWebApplication
final method:
onUnauthorizedInstantiation:
...
public final void
onUnauthorizedInstantiation(final Component
component)
{
// If
there is
a sign in page class declared, and the
unauthorized
//
component is a
page, but it's not the sign in page
if
(component instanceof Page)
{
if
(!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn())
{
// Redirect to intercept
page to let the
user sign in
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
}
else
{
onUnauthorizedPage((Page)component);
}
}
else
{
// The
component was not a
page, so throw an exception
throw new
UnauthorizedInstantiationException(component.getClass());
}
}
...
As it is final I can't
override the line:
...
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
...
to make
setting SignInPage
optional, depending on the cookie, and
if
cookie
is given from
remember me checkbox - than to
authenticate user
just by
login retrieved from the cookie.
And do not show SignInPage and do not
do
any
redirectToInterceptPage.
Thanks in
advance!
P.S.
I
think Wicket as
a project requires more detailed and
features-wide
reference
documentation.
Khlystov
Alexandr пишет:
Good
day.
Can anyone,
please, give an example, or direct wicket API
description
about remember me at login page
feature.
Thanks in advance.
--
Khlystov Alexandr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional
commands, e-mail:
users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional
commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
___
Best regards, Khlystov
Alexandr.
mailto:
a...@ovservice.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
___
Best regards, Khlystov Alexandr.
mailto:
a...@ovservice.org
Re: remember me at login page feature
Did you try putting a breakpoint and finding a suitable place from the
call-stack?
**
Martin
2009/5/6 Khlystov Alexandr a...@ovservice.org:
this is the problem descirbed in first letter:
I can't
change this behavior, because this check:
...
if
(!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn()
...
Is place
in final method of AuthenticatedWebSession.
:)
Well..
darn ... then do not call and check the cookie :)
if
(!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn()
(!myOwnCookieCheck()))
{
:...
}
**
Martin
2009/5/6 Khlystov
Alexandr a...@ovservice.org:
Thanks for reply, Martin.
AuthenticatedWebSession#isSignedIn() is final too :). And according to
design I think it is not the proper place to do the auto-login
logic.
http://people.apache.org/~tobrien/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/authentication/AuthenticatedWebSession.html#isSignedIn()
All you need to do is evaluate
the cookie here:
if
(!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn())
Meaning that this should return TRUE if cookie is
found.
**
Martin
2009/5/5 Khlystov
Alexandr a...@ovservice.org:
Hello
all.
Previous
answers did not helped me much.
Though thanks authors for
their
replies.
I am going to provide more detailed question:
My App extends
AuthenticatedWebApplication {
And I want to implement auto-login/remember me feature.
More precisely - when user submits to browser URL for
some
Wicket page
(and
user is not yet logged in) he
should be
able to see this page without
seeing
SignInPage (if he set at previous session
remember me check
box at
SignInPage).
I can't
understand how can I achive that with the
AuthenticatedWebApplication. How can I
handle redirecting user to the
SignInPage at
org.apache.wicket.authentication;AuthenticatedWebApplication
final method:
onUnauthorizedInstantiation:
...
public final void
onUnauthorizedInstantiation(final Component
component)
{
// If
there is
a sign in page class declared, and the
unauthorized
//
component is a
page, but it's not the sign in page
if
(component instanceof Page)
{
if
(!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn())
{
// Redirect to intercept
page to let the
user sign in
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
}
else
{
onUnauthorizedPage((Page)component);
}
}
else
{
// The
component was not a
page, so throw an exception
throw new
UnauthorizedInstantiationException(component.getClass());
}
}
...
As it is final I can't
override the line:
...
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
...
to make
setting SignInPage
optional, depending on the cookie, and
if
cookie
is given from
remember me checkbox - than to
authenticate user
just by
login retrieved from the cookie.
And do not show SignInPage and do not
do
any
redirectToInterceptPage.
Thanks in
advance!
P.S.
I
think Wicket as
a project requires more detailed and
features-wide
reference
documentation.
Khlystov
Alexandr пишет:
Good
day.
Can anyone,
please, give an example, or direct wicket API
description
about remember me at login page
feature.
Thanks in advance.
--
Khlystov Alexandr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional
commands, e-mail:
users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional
commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
___
Best regards, Khlystov
Alexandr.
mailto:
a...@ovservice.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
___
Best regards, Khlystov Alexandr.
mailto:
a...@ovservice.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: remember me at login page feature
No :), it is to complex. What I do better is than hack the LoginPage
and do there cookie check, and redirecting to requested Page ;).
Did you try putting a breakpoint and finding a suitable place from
the
call-stack?
**
Martin
2009/5/6 Khlystov Alexandr a...@ovservice.org:
this is the problem
descirbed in first letter:
I can't
change this behavior, because this check:
...
if
(!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn()
...
Is place
in final method of
AuthenticatedWebSession.
:)
Well..
darn ... then do not call and check the cookie :)
if
(!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn()
(!myOwnCookieCheck()))
{
:...
}
**
Martin
2009/5/6
Khlystov
Alexandr a...@ovservice.org:
Thanks for reply, Martin.
AuthenticatedWebSession#isSignedIn() is final too :). And
according to
design I think it is not the proper
place to do the auto-login
logic.
http://people.apache.org/~tobrien/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/authentication/AuthenticatedWebSession.html#isSignedIn()
All you
need to do is evaluate
the cookie here:
if
(!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn())
Meaning that this should return TRUE if cookie
is
found.
**
Martin
2009/5/5 Khlystov
Alexandr
a...@ovservice.org:
Hello
all.
Previous
answers did not helped
me much.
Though thanks authors for
their
replies.
I am going to
provide more detailed question:
My App extends
AuthenticatedWebApplication {
And I want to implement
auto-login/remember me feature.
More
precisely - when user submits to browser URL for
some
Wicket page
(and
user is not yet logged in) he
should be
able to see this page
without
seeing
SignInPage (if he set at
previous session
remember me check
box at
SignInPage).
I
can't
understand how can I achive that with the
AuthenticatedWebApplication. How can I
handle redirecting
user to the
SignInPage at
org.apache.wicket.authentication;AuthenticatedWebApplication
final method:
onUnauthorizedInstantiation:
...
public final
void
onUnauthorizedInstantiation(final Component
component)
{
//
If
there is
a sign in page class
declared, and the
unauthorized
//
component is a
page, but it's
not the sign in page
if
(component instanceof Page)
{
if
(!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn())
{
// Redirect to intercept
page to let the
user sign in
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
}
else
{
onUnauthorizedPage((Page)component);
}
}
else
{
// The
component was
not a
page, so throw an exception
throw new
UnauthorizedInstantiationException(component.getClass());
}
}
...
As it is final I
can't
override the line:
...
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
...
to make
setting SignInPage
optional, depending on the cookie, and
if
cookie
is
given from
remember me checkbox - than to
authenticate user
just by
login retrieved from the cookie.
And do not show SignInPage and do not
do
any
redirectToInterceptPage.
Thanks in
advance!
P.S.
I
think Wicket as
a project requires more detailed and
features-wide
reference
documentation.
Khlystov
Alexandr пишет:
Good
day.
Can
anyone,
please, give an example, or direct wicket API
description
about
remember me at login page
feature.
Thanks in advance.
--
Khlystov Alexandr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For
additional
commands, e-mail:
users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For
additional
commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
___
Best regards, Khlystov
Alexandr.
mailto:
a...@ovservice.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional
commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
___
Best regards, Khlystov
Alexandr.
mailto:
a...@ovservice.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
___
Best regards, Khlystov Alexandr.
mailto:
a...@ovservice.org
Re: FW: need help urgent......Change label dynamicly
Maybe you could add two buttons and set the other visible? Cheers Per - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Encoding problems in forms
Hi, I'm using the wicket distribution for java 1.4 on a OC4J 10.1.3.3, When using a form, I'm having some encoding problems similar to the ones in the link below http://markmail.org/search/?q=wicket+encoding#query:wicket%20encoding+page:1+mid:ebuxlgb2vvu7x6oo+state:results Problem is, that for me changing to UTF-8 doesn't seem to help (nor any other encoding) ... Any ideas ?
Re: FW: need help urgent......Change label dynamicly
Maybe to it with an attribute modifier.. I cant remember ajaxbutton.. 2009/5/6 Per Newgro per.new...@gmx.ch: Maybe you could add two buttons and set the other visible? Cheers Per - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: FW: need help urgent......Change label dynamicly
AFAIR a button's label comes from it's Model. So you should do:
new AjaxButton(preview){
public void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form form){
String label = getModelObject(); // or
getDefaultModelObject(); if 1.4
if (click.equals(label) {
getModel().setObject(unclick); // or
getDefaultModel().setObject(unclick) in case you're at 1.4
}
}
}.setModel(click);
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:44 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe to it with an attribute modifier.. I cant remember ajaxbutton..
2009/5/6 Per Newgro per.new...@gmx.ch:
Maybe you could add two buttons and set the other visible?
Cheers
Per
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: FW: need help urgent......Change label dynamicly
And of course don't forget to add the button or a parent component to
the ajaxrequesttarget as well.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Janos Cserep cser...@metaprime.hu wrote:
AFAIR a button's label comes from it's Model. So you should do:
new AjaxButton(preview){
public void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form form){
String label = getModelObject(); // or
getDefaultModelObject(); if 1.4
if (click.equals(label) {
getModel().setObject(unclick); // or
getDefaultModel().setObject(unclick) in case you're at 1.4
}
}
}.setModel(click);
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:44 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe to it with an attribute modifier.. I cant remember ajaxbutton..
2009/5/6 Per Newgro per.new...@gmx.ch:
Maybe you could add two buttons and set the other visible?
Cheers
Per
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DateTextField design issue
More on that,
we used the newConverterLocator() in out application exactly as it is
suggested in WIA, page 297.
However, because the DateTextField has its own converter, we even don't get
to our customized converter.
Is it a bug?
Please advise.
Eyal Golan
egola...@gmail.com
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74
P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Eyal Golan egola...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
We use Wicket 1.3.5 and I found something annoying with the DateTextField.
In the constructor of that class, the converter is created internally.
If I want to use my own converter, I need to inherit DateTextField, add a
converter as a member, and return it in the getConverter method.
Why not have a protected method (that can be overridden) that returns the
converter:
Instead of:
public DateTextField(String id, IModel model, String datePattern)
{
super(id, model, Date.class);
this.datePattern = datePattern;
*this.converter = new DateConverter()
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.util.convert.converters.DateConverter#getDateFormat(java.util.Locale)
*/
public DateFormat getDateFormat(Locale locale)
{
return new
SimpleDateFormat(DateTextField.this.datePattern);
}
};*
}
Do something like:
public DateTextField(String id, IModel model, String datePattern)
{
super(id, model, Date.class);
this.datePattern = datePattern;
*this.converter = newDateConverter();*
}
and
protected newDateConverter() {
return new DateConverter()
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.util.convert.converters.DateConverter#getDateFormat(java.util.Locale)
*/
public DateFormat getDateFormat(Locale locale)
{
return new
SimpleDateFormat(DateTextField.this.datePattern);
}
};
}
BTW, I know that we can also use the newConverterLocator() in our
application.
Do you think I should open a JIRA issue with 'wish' for that?
Eyal Golan
egola...@gmail.com
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74
P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary
ListMultipleChoice AbstactChoice methodclass access too strict?
Hi, I have a case where ListMultipleChoice is on a page and model of choices can change. To be more spesific, selected values can be moved up and down on a list. When ListMultipleChoice is updated via Ajax, selected items do not stay selected. I thought that overriding isSelected on a ListMultipleChoice would be a viable option (not pretty though), because I already have the selected objects cached elsewhere, so determing whether or not an object is selected would be trivial. But then I thought maybe I would be better to inherit a whole new implementation from AbstractChoice. Well, it could be done, but the class has package access to it, so no luck there. And if I override appendOptionHtml, it should be entirely rewritten. And it uses private fields (renderer, and setter for that is again final...) of AbstractChoice, so it makes things even more difficult. Could it be possible to change access to the AbstractChoice (is package access at all necessary?)? Or have I missed something obvious and maybe thinking this wrong way around? All I would like to do, is set correct objects on list as selected, but I guess that there is no any good way doing that. -- Mikko Pukki Syncron Tech Oy Laserkatu 6 53850 Lappeenranta +358 400 757 178 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Maven setup
Hi, does anybody have a Wicket quickstart project updated to the latest versions? I am new to Java, to Maven and to Wicket of course too. I have a background in web developing with Zope and Django (all implemented in Python) but am forced to use Java now. I know that the learning curve will be steep and I got some showstoppers already :) After reading much about many Java frameworks and some frustrating tests with JSF I've chosen Wicket because it fits my requirements best. I've done some tests with databinder which promoted Maven heavily, so I want to use Maven too. I'm still struggling with the whole setup - the following issues are still not clear to me: - Maven setup - Wicket dependency doesn't work for 1.3.5 nor for 1.3.6 although the website says so (data at the end of this message) Possibly another repository required? - integration with Eclipse - Maven goal or Eclipse plugin or both? - I want to use embedded Jetty also for production (running the application behind lighttpd). How to do deployment in an elegant way? There is only SSH access to my server. - Hibernate integration - does databinder help much or is it better to learn Hibernate directly? I saw that databinder always is somewhat behind the current versions, so that may be an issue. I hope these are not too stupid questions and someone will find the time to answer them. With kind regards, Frank The Maven dependency for wicket: dependency groupIdwicket/groupId artifactIdwicket/artifactId version1.3.5/version /dependency The error: [INFO]task-segment: [compile] [INFO] [INFO] [resources:resources] [WARNING] Using platform encoding (Cp1252 actually) to copy filtered resources, i.e. build is platform dependent! [INFO] Copying 1 resource Downloading: http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.3.5/wicket-1.3.5.pom [INFO] Unable to find resource 'wicket:wicket:pom:1.3.5' in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) [INFO] artifact wicket:wicket-extensions: checking for updates from central [INFO] artifact mysql:mysql-connector-java: checking for updates from central [INFO] artifact org.mortbay.jetty:jetty: checking for updates from central Downloading: http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.3.5/wicket-1.3.5.jar [INFO] Unable to find resource 'wicket:wicket:jar:1.3.5' in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Maven setup
Have you checked http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html ? You can copy the archtype command. paste in your command prompt and the run it. after that, run mvn eclipse:eclipse and you'll have everything you need. Also the Jetty embedded plugin. Eyal Golan egola...@gmail.com Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74 P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Frank Tegtmeyer frank.tegtme...@online-systemhaus.com wrote: Hi, does anybody have a Wicket quickstart project updated to the latest versions? I am new to Java, to Maven and to Wicket of course too. I have a background in web developing with Zope and Django (all implemented in Python) but am forced to use Java now. I know that the learning curve will be steep and I got some showstoppers already :) After reading much about many Java frameworks and some frustrating tests with JSF I've chosen Wicket because it fits my requirements best. I've done some tests with databinder which promoted Maven heavily, so I want to use Maven too. I'm still struggling with the whole setup - the following issues are still not clear to me: - Maven setup - Wicket dependency doesn't work for 1.3.5 nor for 1.3.6 although the website says so (data at the end of this message) Possibly another repository required? - integration with Eclipse - Maven goal or Eclipse plugin or both? - I want to use embedded Jetty also for production (running the application behind lighttpd). How to do deployment in an elegant way? There is only SSH access to my server. - Hibernate integration - does databinder help much or is it better to learn Hibernate directly? I saw that databinder always is somewhat behind the current versions, so that may be an issue. I hope these are not too stupid questions and someone will find the time to answer them. With kind regards, Frank The Maven dependency for wicket: dependency groupIdwicket/groupId artifactIdwicket/artifactId version1.3.5/version /dependency The error: [INFO]task-segment: [compile] [INFO] [INFO] [resources:resources] [WARNING] Using platform encoding (Cp1252 actually) to copy filtered resources, i.e. build is platform dependent! [INFO] Copying 1 resource Downloading: http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.3.5/wicket-1.3.5.pom [INFO] Unable to find resource 'wicket:wicket:pom:1.3.5' in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) [INFO] artifact wicket:wicket-extensions: checking for updates from central [INFO] artifact mysql:mysql-connector-java: checking for updates from central [INFO] artifact org.mortbay.jetty:jetty: checking for updates from central Downloading: http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.3.5/wicket-1.3.5.jar [INFO] Unable to find resource 'wicket:wicket:jar:1.3.5' in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DropDownChoice with ChoiceRender problem
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:39 AM, jensiator jens.alen...@megasol.se wrote: But still. In this case the map is constant. What when the values is fetched from db. Are you going to call tha db every time you want to get the displayname? I wouldn't suggest this solution in that case. This was an enumerated values case (perhaps an enum would work better here?). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Maven setup
For more information about Maven, check out this online book: http://www.sonatype.com/books/maven-book/pdf/maven-definitive-guide.pdf Regards, Linda Frank Tegtmeyer wrote: Hi, does anybody have a Wicket quickstart project updated to the latest versions? I am new to Java, to Maven and to Wicket of course too. I have a background in web developing with Zope and Django (all implemented in Python) but am forced to use Java now. I know that the learning curve will be steep and I got some showstoppers already :) After reading much about many Java frameworks and some frustrating tests with JSF I've chosen Wicket because it fits my requirements best. I've done some tests with databinder which promoted Maven heavily, so I want to use Maven too. I'm still struggling with the whole setup - the following issues are still not clear to me: - Maven setup - Wicket dependency doesn't work for 1.3.5 nor for 1.3.6 although the website says so (data at the end of this message) Possibly another repository required? - integration with Eclipse - Maven goal or Eclipse plugin or both? - I want to use embedded Jetty also for production (running the application behind lighttpd). How to do deployment in an elegant way? There is only SSH access to my server. - Hibernate integration - does databinder help much or is it better to learn Hibernate directly? I saw that databinder always is somewhat behind the current versions, so that may be an issue. I hope these are not too stupid questions and someone will find the time to answer them. With kind regards, Frank The Maven dependency for wicket: dependency groupIdwicket/groupId artifactIdwicket/artifactId version1.3.5/version /dependency The error: [INFO]task-segment: [compile] [INFO] [INFO] [resources:resources] [WARNING] Using platform encoding (Cp1252 actually) to copy filtered resources, i.e. build is platform dependent! [INFO] Copying 1 resource Downloading: http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.3.5/wicket-1.3.5.pom [INFO] Unable to find resource 'wicket:wicket:pom:1.3.5' in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) [INFO] artifact wicket:wicket-extensions: checking for updates from central [INFO] artifact mysql:mysql-connector-java: checking for updates from central [INFO] artifact org.mortbay.jetty:jetty: checking for updates from central Downloading: http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.3.5/wicket-1.3.5.jar [INFO] Unable to find resource 'wicket:wicket:jar:1.3.5' in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.325 / Virus Database: 270.12.20/2100 - Release Date: 05/06/09 06:04:00 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Maven setup
Hi, The dependency is wrong. It should be: dependency groupIdorg.apache.wicket/groupId artifactIdwicket/artifactId version1.3.5/version /dependency cheers, Steve On 6 May 2009, at 11:47, Frank Tegtmeyer wrote: Hi, does anybody have a Wicket quickstart project updated to the latest versions? I am new to Java, to Maven and to Wicket of course too. I have a background in web developing with Zope and Django (all implemented in Python) but am forced to use Java now. I know that the learning curve will be steep and I got some showstoppers already :) After reading much about many Java frameworks and some frustrating tests with JSF I've chosen Wicket because it fits my requirements best. I've done some tests with databinder which promoted Maven heavily, so I want to use Maven too. I'm still struggling with the whole setup - the following issues are still not clear to me: - Maven setup - Wicket dependency doesn't work for 1.3.5 nor for 1.3.6 although the website says so (data at the end of this message) Possibly another repository required? - integration with Eclipse - Maven goal or Eclipse plugin or both? - I want to use embedded Jetty also for production (running the application behind lighttpd). How to do deployment in an elegant way? There is only SSH access to my server. - Hibernate integration - does databinder help much or is it better to learn Hibernate directly? I saw that databinder always is somewhat behind the current versions, so that may be an issue. I hope these are not too stupid questions and someone will find the time to answer them. With kind regards, Frank The Maven dependency for wicket: dependency groupIdwicket/groupId artifactIdwicket/artifactId version1.3.5/version /dependency The error: [INFO]task-segment: [compile] [INFO] [INFO] [resources:resources] [WARNING] Using platform encoding (Cp1252 actually) to copy filtered resources, i.e. build is platform dependent! [INFO] Copying 1 resource Downloading: http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.3.5/wicket-1.3.5.pom [INFO] Unable to find resource 'wicket:wicket:pom:1.3.5' in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) [INFO] artifact wicket:wicket-extensions: checking for updates from central [INFO] artifact mysql:mysql-connector-java: checking for updates from central [INFO] artifact org.mortbay.jetty:jetty: checking for updates from central Downloading: http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.3.5/wicket-1.3.5.jar [INFO] Unable to find resource 'wicket:wicket:jar:1.3.5' in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: best way to add tooltips in wicket
Have you tried using overLIB? I've got some code if you're interested. On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:59 AM, RoyBatty math...@afjochnick.net wrote: Hi Nino, regarding Mootip, to sum up what i've noted: 1. while i think Mootip looks better than prototip, i felt that it seemed, well, slower. Basically, when you move the mouse around mootip updates less frequently and thus appears glitchier than prototip. 2. Another thing was that i couldn't see that it was possible to create a MooTip without a header. To point to a specific place in the code, I couldn't see that there was a way to set the addTitle boolean to false. This makes all tooltip to have a header and body segment even when there's no header text, which is not optimal. These points, mostly point 2, made me pick prototip. Now, with the quirks with prototip i mentioned in another post, I might have to make another pass at picking the framework to use... *sigh*. At least some nice folks here have given me some pointers, thanks for that. Cheers/Mathias nino martinez wael wrote: Please do tell if there are any issues with mootip, do not hesitate to write me (i'll be using it soon).. Im not soo keen todo stuff with prototip, since it's commercial license as of the latest version.. 2009/5/4 Mathias Nilsson wicket.program...@gmail.com: yes I have the same exact problem. Tried all settings there is in ProtoTip. The only thing that worked was to have onclick to show the tip and close button but this is of course not the way we want it. If you come up with a solution please post it here. Do you experience the same bug with MooTip? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/best-way-to-add-tooltips-in-wicket-tp22697930p23371425.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/best-way-to-add-tooltips-in-wicket-tp22697930p23401104.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Maven setup
Eyal Golan egola...@gmail.com wrote: Have you checked http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html ? Yes I saw it some day but forgot about it. Thanks for pointing there. Thanks also to Linda and Steve. All this was very helpful. Regards, Frank - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: best way to add tooltips in wicket
Hi Roy Regarding 1. You should be able to tweak settings as you want theres a showdelay setting you can setup. And a lot more settings regarding timeout etc if wanted.. Regarding 2: No it seems it has to have a title at least my wrappers, you could try to set maxTitleChars to 0, int the mootip settings.. I just did'nt see the need for not having a title when I created it :) 2009/5/6 RoyBatty math...@afjochnick.net: Hi Nino, regarding Mootip, to sum up what i've noted: 1. while i think Mootip looks better than prototip, i felt that it seemed, well, slower. Basically, when you move the mouse around mootip updates less frequently and thus appears glitchier than prototip. 2. Another thing was that i couldn't see that it was possible to create a MooTip without a header. To point to a specific place in the code, I couldn't see that there was a way to set the addTitle boolean to false. This makes all tooltip to have a header and body segment even when there's no header text, which is not optimal. These points, mostly point 2, made me pick prototip. Now, with the quirks with prototip i mentioned in another post, I might have to make another pass at picking the framework to use... *sigh*. At least some nice folks here have given me some pointers, thanks for that. Cheers/Mathias nino martinez wael wrote: Please do tell if there are any issues with mootip, do not hesitate to write me (i'll be using it soon).. Im not soo keen todo stuff with prototip, since it's commercial license as of the latest version.. 2009/5/4 Mathias Nilsson wicket.program...@gmail.com: yes I have the same exact problem. Tried all settings there is in ProtoTip. The only thing that worked was to have onclick to show the tip and close button but this is of course not the way we want it. If you come up with a solution please post it here. Do you experience the same bug with MooTip? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/best-way-to-add-tooltips-in-wicket-tp22697930p23371425.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/best-way-to-add-tooltips-in-wicket-tp22697930p23401104.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Maven setup
Hi, Kindly have a look on this webpage, www.ilearnzone.com/wicket.html It's a video tutorial that explains kicking off with wicket along with maven + tomcat/jetty :) it also explains kicking off without maven. Regards, Ahmed M. On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Frank Tegtmeyer frank.tegtme...@online-systemhaus.com wrote: Eyal Golan egola...@gmail.com wrote: Have you checked http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html ? Yes I saw it some day but forgot about it. Thanks for pointing there. Thanks also to Linda and Steve. All this was very helpful. Regards, Frank - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Add a ui lock page over the page while waiting for response
Hi We have a web form which does some very extensive backend communication requiring a lot of time. So usually after pressing 'submit', the UI is locked for 10-30 seconds. To avoid re-submission, we'd like to put some kind of ui-lock-page over the current page, stating 'Please wait' or something. So I'd need something to add to the onclick of the submit button (which is NOT an ajax button but a normal input type=submit button) which blocks the UI until the response is ready. I've tried the wicket-stuff veil thingy, but it doesn't work. Here's what I tried: WebMarkupContainer submit = new WebMarkupContainer(submit); submit.add(new Veil()); add(submit); But even though I see some JS files added to the page, nothing happens when I click my button? Is there something else that I can just add to a button? Thanks a lot Matt -- matthias.kel...@ergon.ch +41 44 268 83 98 Ergon Informatik AG, Kleinstrasse 15, CH-8008 Zürich http://www.ergon.ch __ e r g o nsmart people - smart software Ergon ist im Final für den Fairnesspreis 2009 - Online-Abstimmung bis 6. Mai 2009 unter www.fairnesspreis.ch smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: remember me at login page feature
Guys? if really nobody has implemented the auto-login via cookie, basing
on AuthenticatedWebApplication ???
Khlystov Alexandr пишет:
Hello all.
Previous answers did not helped me much. Though thanks authors for
their replies.
I am going to provide more detailed question:
My App extends AuthenticatedWebApplication {
And I want to implement auto-login/remember me feature.
More precisely - when user submits to browser URL for some Wicket page
(and user is not yet logged in) he should be able to see this page
without seeing SignInPage (if he set at previous session remember me
check box at SignInPage).
I can't understand how can I achive that with the
AuthenticatedWebApplication. How can I handle redirecting user to the
SignInPage at
org.apache.wicket.authentication;AuthenticatedWebApplication final
method: onUnauthorizedInstantiation:
...
public final void onUnauthorizedInstantiation(final Component
component)
{
// If there is a sign in page class declared, and the unauthorized
// component is a page, but it's not the sign in page
if (component instanceof Page)
{
if (!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn())
{
// Redirect to intercept page to let the user sign in
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
}
else
{
onUnauthorizedPage((Page)component);
}
}
else
{
// The component was not a page, so throw an exception
throw new
UnauthorizedInstantiationException(component.getClass());
}
}
...
As it is final I can't override the line:
...
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
...
to make setting SignInPage optional, depending on the cookie, and if
cookie is given from remember me checkbox - than to authenticate
user just by login retrieved from the cookie. And do not show
SignInPage and do not do any redirectToInterceptPage.
Thanks in advance!
P.S.
I think Wicket as a project requires more detailed and features-wide
reference documentation.
Khlystov Alexandr пишет:
Good day.
Can anyone, please, give an example, or direct wicket API description
about remember me at login page feature.
Thanks in advance.
--
Khlystov Alexandr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: remember me at login page feature
Are you using acegi/spring-security? If so, have you looked into
using their remember me filter:
http://static.springframework.org/spring-security/site/reference/html/remember-me.html
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Khlystov Alexandr a...@ovservice.org wrote:
Guys? if really nobody has implemented the auto-login via cookie, basing on
AuthenticatedWebApplication ???
Khlystov Alexandr пишет:
Hello all.
Previous answers did not helped me much. Though thanks authors for their
replies.
I am going to provide more detailed question:
My App extends AuthenticatedWebApplication {
And I want to implement auto-login/remember me feature.
More precisely - when user submits to browser URL for some Wicket page
(and user is not yet logged in) he should be able to see this page without
seeing SignInPage (if he set at previous session remember me check box at
SignInPage).
I can't understand how can I achive that with the
AuthenticatedWebApplication. How can I handle redirecting user to the
SignInPage at org.apache.wicket.authentication;AuthenticatedWebApplication
final method: onUnauthorizedInstantiation:
...
public final void onUnauthorizedInstantiation(final Component component)
{
// If there is a sign in page class declared, and the unauthorized
// component is a page, but it's not the sign in page
if (component instanceof Page)
{
if (!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn())
{
// Redirect to intercept page to let the user sign in
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
}
else
{
onUnauthorizedPage((Page)component);
}
}
else
{
// The component was not a page, so throw an exception
throw new
UnauthorizedInstantiationException(component.getClass());
}
}
...
As it is final I can't override the line:
...
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
...
to make setting SignInPage optional, depending on the cookie, and if
cookie is given from remember me checkbox - than to authenticate user just
by login retrieved from the cookie. And do not show SignInPage and do not do
any redirectToInterceptPage.
Thanks in advance!
P.S.
I think Wicket as a project requires more detailed and features-wide
reference documentation.
Khlystov Alexandr пишет:
Good day.
Can anyone, please, give an example, or direct wicket API description
about remember me at login page feature.
Thanks in advance.
--
Khlystov Alexandr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Maven setup
hi, also check `mvn deploy` - you can use that to export your war with scp://, for maven eclipse integration check m2eclipse. as for lighttpd, i don't know, but i remember there was no ajp connector available last time i was searching, let us know if you have some experience on that! oh, and a comparison one day between django and wicket would be cool ... :-) cheers, roman Null kühl wrote: Hi, Kindly have a look on this webpage, www.ilearnzone.com/wicket.html It's a video tutorial that explains kicking off with wicket along with maven + tomcat/jetty :) it also explains kicking off without maven. Regards, Ahmed M. On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Frank Tegtmeyer frank.tegtme...@online-systemhaus.com wrote: Eyal Golan egola...@gmail.com wrote: Have you checked http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html ? Yes I saw it some day but forgot about it. Thanks for pointing there. Thanks also to Linda and Steve. All this was very helpful. Regards, Frank - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Liland ...does IT better Liland IT GmbH Creative Master email: roman.zech...@liland.at office: +43 (0)463 220-111 | fax: +43 (0)463 220-288 http://www.Liland.at - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Add a ui lock page over the page while waiting for response
Back when I was programming in jsp I solved this by disabling the button after clicking it (because it would redirect after processing the data). Not sure how I'd do such a thing with Wicket. Linda. Matthias Keller wrote: Hi We have a web form which does some very extensive backend communication requiring a lot of time. So usually after pressing 'submit', the UI is locked for 10-30 seconds. To avoid re-submission, we'd like to put some kind of ui-lock-page over the current page, stating 'Please wait' or something. So I'd need something to add to the onclick of the submit button (which is NOT an ajax button but a normal input type=submit button) which blocks the UI until the response is ready. I've tried the wicket-stuff veil thingy, but it doesn't work. Here's what I tried: WebMarkupContainer submit = new WebMarkupContainer(submit); submit.add(new Veil()); add(submit); But even though I see some JS files added to the page, nothing happens when I click my button? Is there something else that I can just add to a button? Thanks a lot Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Forcing model update?
Hi Is there a way to force the model to update even if the field value is not change? Why would I want to do that? Because I am using Castor (xml) object. And for element of type Int, the Castor objects have a boolean method like HasElementName. It is set to false until the value of the element is set. If HasElementName is set to false and the element is mandatory (from the XSD definition), there will be a validation exception when trying to marshall the xml. The problem is with the default value (has defined in the XSD). If I have an element with a default value like 5 for example. This value will be displayed on my page correctly, but when I save it without changing the value, the model object is not updated. Then the HasElementName is not change and the exception is throwed! Of course I have a workaround. Just before creating the component, I can add something like: CastorObject.setElementValue( CastorObject.getElementValue() ); to force the value to be set using the current value. But I think this is ugly... Thierry
Re: Forcing model update?
Call Component.modelChanged()? On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Thierry Leveque tleve...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Is there a way to force the model to update even if the field value is not change? Why would I want to do that? Because I am using Castor (xml) object. And for element of type Int, the Castor objects have a boolean method like HasElementName. It is set to false until the value of the element is set. If HasElementName is set to false and the element is mandatory (from the XSD definition), there will be a validation exception when trying to marshall the xml. The problem is with the default value (has defined in the XSD). If I have an element with a default value like 5 for example. This value will be displayed on my page correctly, but when I save it without changing the value, the model object is not updated. Then the HasElementName is not change and the exception is throwed! Of course I have a workaround. Just before creating the component, I can add something like: CastorObject.setElementValue( CastorObject.getElementValue() ); to force the value to be set using the current value. But I think this is ugly... Thierry - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Add a ui lock page over the page while waiting for response
There is a veil component in wicketstuff-minis, I believe. That might help. On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Linda van der Pal lvd...@heritageagenturen.nl wrote: Back when I was programming in jsp I solved this by disabling the button after clicking it (because it would redirect after processing the data). Not sure how I'd do such a thing with Wicket. Linda. Matthias Keller wrote: Hi We have a web form which does some very extensive backend communication requiring a lot of time. So usually after pressing 'submit', the UI is locked for 10-30 seconds. To avoid re-submission, we'd like to put some kind of ui-lock-page over the current page, stating 'Please wait' or something. So I'd need something to add to the onclick of the submit button (which is NOT an ajax button but a normal input type=submit button) which blocks the UI until the response is ready. I've tried the wicket-stuff veil thingy, but it doesn't work. Here's what I tried: WebMarkupContainer submit = new WebMarkupContainer(submit); submit.add(new Veil()); add(submit); But even though I see some JS files added to the page, nothing happens when I click my button? Is there something else that I can just add to a button? Thanks a lot Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Add a ui lock page over the page while waiting for response
you could use the jquery blockui plugin.. http://malsup.com/jquery/block/#demos James Carman wrote: There is a veil component in wicketstuff-minis, I believe. That might help. On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Linda van der Pal lvd...@heritageagenturen.nl wrote: Back when I was programming in jsp I solved this by disabling the button after clicking it (because it would redirect after processing the data). Not sure how I'd do such a thing with Wicket. Linda. Matthias Keller wrote: Hi We have a web form which does some very extensive backend communication requiring a lot of time. So usually after pressing 'submit', the UI is locked for 10-30 seconds. To avoid re-submission, we'd like to put some kind of ui-lock-page over the current page, stating 'Please wait' or something. So I'd need something to add to the onclick of the submit button (which is NOT an ajax button but a normal input type=submit button) which blocks the UI until the response is ready. I've tried the wicket-stuff veil thingy, but it doesn't work. Here's what I tried: WebMarkupContainer submit = new WebMarkupContainer(submit); submit.add(new Veil()); add(submit); But even though I see some JS files added to the page, nothing happens when I click my button? Is there something else that I can just add to a button? Thanks a lot Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Add a ui lock page over the page while waiting for response
I think the veil are just over a certain component, like only the button.. I think he are looking for a Either Modal or something more than Veil, there was an article somewhere about it.. 2009/5/6 James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com: There is a veil component in wicketstuff-minis, I believe. That might help. On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Linda van der Pal lvd...@heritageagenturen.nl wrote: Back when I was programming in jsp I solved this by disabling the button after clicking it (because it would redirect after processing the data). Not sure how I'd do such a thing with Wicket. Linda. Matthias Keller wrote: Hi We have a web form which does some very extensive backend communication requiring a lot of time. So usually after pressing 'submit', the UI is locked for 10-30 seconds. To avoid re-submission, we'd like to put some kind of ui-lock-page over the current page, stating 'Please wait' or something. So I'd need something to add to the onclick of the submit button (which is NOT an ajax button but a normal input type=submit button) which blocks the UI until the response is ready. I've tried the wicket-stuff veil thingy, but it doesn't work. Here's what I tried: WebMarkupContainer submit = new WebMarkupContainer(submit); submit.add(new Veil()); add(submit); But even though I see some JS files added to the page, nothing happens when I click my button? Is there something else that I can just add to a button? Thanks a lot Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Avoiding 'WicketMessage: Unable to find component with id' error
Im a wicket newbie ..
I have a Search Page with some search criteria inputs and below it, the list
of data based on search.
The first time the page is hit, the listView component is not still present,
because Im adding that only onSubmit() -- like this:
class XPage extends WebPage {
class XForm extends Form {
...
@Override public void onSubmit() {
List resultList = searchDao.search(searchOptions);
add(new ListView (listView, resultList ) {
});
}
}
The html is straightforward..
form ...
/form
div id=resultArea
table
tr wicket:id=listView
...
/tr
/table
/div
Even at first hit of the page, wicket shows up the message Unable to find
component with id listView ..
Is there a way to make Wicket not worry about unfound components or is there
any other standard way of handling it ?
Appreciate any help...
--
Regards,
Vasu
Re: Avoiding 'WicketMessage: Unable to find component with id' error
You should add the listView right away and keep it invisible until a
search result is available.
Sven
On Mi, 2009-05-06 at 10:07 -0500, Vasu Srinivasan wrote:
Im a wicket newbie ..
I have a Search Page with some search criteria inputs and below it, the list
of data based on search.
The first time the page is hit, the listView component is not still present,
because Im adding that only onSubmit() -- like this:
class XPage extends WebPage {
class XForm extends Form {
...
@Override public void onSubmit() {
List resultList = searchDao.search(searchOptions);
add(new ListView (listView, resultList ) {
});
}
}
The html is straightforward..
form ...
/form
div id=resultArea
table
tr wicket:id=listView
...
/tr
/table
/div
Even at first hit of the page, wicket shows up the message Unable to find
component with id listView ..
Is there a way to make Wicket not worry about unfound components or is there
any other standard way of handling it ?
Appreciate any help...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Add a ui lock page over the page while waiting for response
I thought the veil covered the whole screen. If it's not, you could easily do that by adding a div with a WebMarkupContainer that covers all the content of your page. On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:04 AM, nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote: I think the veil are just over a certain component, like only the button.. I think he are looking for a Either Modal or something more than Veil, there was an article somewhere about it.. 2009/5/6 James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com: There is a veil component in wicketstuff-minis, I believe. That might help. On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Linda van der Pal lvd...@heritageagenturen.nl wrote: Back when I was programming in jsp I solved this by disabling the button after clicking it (because it would redirect after processing the data). Not sure how I'd do such a thing with Wicket. Linda. Matthias Keller wrote: Hi We have a web form which does some very extensive backend communication requiring a lot of time. So usually after pressing 'submit', the UI is locked for 10-30 seconds. To avoid re-submission, we'd like to put some kind of ui-lock-page over the current page, stating 'Please wait' or something. So I'd need something to add to the onclick of the submit button (which is NOT an ajax button but a normal input type=submit button) which blocks the UI until the response is ready. I've tried the wicket-stuff veil thingy, but it doesn't work. Here's what I tried: WebMarkupContainer submit = new WebMarkupContainer(submit); submit.add(new Veil()); add(submit); But even though I see some JS files added to the page, nothing happens when I click my button? Is there something else that I can just add to a button? Thanks a lot Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Add a ui lock page over the page while waiting for response
Not as I remember, veil just makes it impossible to interact with a component.. Cant remember more.. I last time I ended up doing a simple component that blocks the entire screen... 2009/5/6 James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com: I thought the veil covered the whole screen. If it's not, you could easily do that by adding a div with a WebMarkupContainer that covers all the content of your page. On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:04 AM, nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote: I think the veil are just over a certain component, like only the button.. I think he are looking for a Either Modal or something more than Veil, there was an article somewhere about it.. 2009/5/6 James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com: There is a veil component in wicketstuff-minis, I believe. That might help. On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Linda van der Pal lvd...@heritageagenturen.nl wrote: Back when I was programming in jsp I solved this by disabling the button after clicking it (because it would redirect after processing the data). Not sure how I'd do such a thing with Wicket. Linda. Matthias Keller wrote: Hi We have a web form which does some very extensive backend communication requiring a lot of time. So usually after pressing 'submit', the UI is locked for 10-30 seconds. To avoid re-submission, we'd like to put some kind of ui-lock-page over the current page, stating 'Please wait' or something. So I'd need something to add to the onclick of the submit button (which is NOT an ajax button but a normal input type=submit button) which blocks the UI until the response is ready. I've tried the wicket-stuff veil thingy, but it doesn't work. Here's what I tried: WebMarkupContainer submit = new WebMarkupContainer(submit); submit.add(new Veil()); add(submit); But even though I see some JS files added to the page, nothing happens when I click my button? Is there something else that I can just add to a button? Thanks a lot Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DateTextField design issue
what is the full name of this class? there are two DateTextField
classes in wicket codebase.
-igor
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Eyal Golan egola...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
We use Wicket 1.3.5 and I found something annoying with the DateTextField.
In the constructor of that class, the converter is created internally.
If I want to use my own converter, I need to inherit DateTextField, add a
converter as a member, and return it in the getConverter method.
Why not have a protected method (that can be overridden) that returns the
converter:
Instead of:
public DateTextField(String id, IModel model, String datePattern)
{
super(id, model, Date.class);
this.datePattern = datePattern;
*this.converter = new DateConverter()
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.util.convert.converters.DateConverter#getDateFormat(java.util.Locale)
*/
public DateFormat getDateFormat(Locale locale)
{
return new SimpleDateFormat(DateTextField.this.datePattern);
}
};*
}
Do something like:
public DateTextField(String id, IModel model, String datePattern)
{
super(id, model, Date.class);
this.datePattern = datePattern;
*this.converter = newDateConverter();*
}
and
protected newDateConverter() {
return new DateConverter()
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.util.convert.converters.DateConverter#getDateFormat(java.util.Locale)
*/
public DateFormat getDateFormat(Locale locale)
{
return new SimpleDateFormat(DateTextField.this.datePattern);
}
};
}
BTW, I know that we can also use the newConverterLocator() in our
application.
Do you think I should open a JIRA issue with 'wish' for that?
Eyal Golan
egola...@gmail.com
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74
P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: remember me at login page feature
if you search this list for wicket-auth-roles you will see that the
project is meant as an example, not as something for you to base your
project on. if some piece doesnt do what you want then roll your own
piece. the codebase is kept simple on purpose - it has to be easy to
read - because it is an example.
-igor
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Khlystov Alexandr a...@ovservice.org wrote:
Guys? if really nobody has implemented the auto-login via cookie, basing on
AuthenticatedWebApplication ???
Khlystov Alexandr пишет:
Hello all.
Previous answers did not helped me much. Though thanks authors for their
replies.
I am going to provide more detailed question:
My App extends AuthenticatedWebApplication {
And I want to implement auto-login/remember me feature.
More precisely - when user submits to browser URL for some Wicket page
(and user is not yet logged in) he should be able to see this page without
seeing SignInPage (if he set at previous session remember me check box at
SignInPage).
I can't understand how can I achive that with the
AuthenticatedWebApplication. How can I handle redirecting user to the
SignInPage at org.apache.wicket.authentication;AuthenticatedWebApplication
final method: onUnauthorizedInstantiation:
...
public final void onUnauthorizedInstantiation(final Component component)
{
// If there is a sign in page class declared, and the unauthorized
// component is a page, but it's not the sign in page
if (component instanceof Page)
{
if (!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn())
{
// Redirect to intercept page to let the user sign in
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
}
else
{
onUnauthorizedPage((Page)component);
}
}
else
{
// The component was not a page, so throw an exception
throw new
UnauthorizedInstantiationException(component.getClass());
}
}
...
As it is final I can't override the line:
...
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
...
to make setting SignInPage optional, depending on the cookie, and if
cookie is given from remember me checkbox - than to authenticate user just
by login retrieved from the cookie. And do not show SignInPage and do not do
any redirectToInterceptPage.
Thanks in advance!
P.S.
I think Wicket as a project requires more detailed and features-wide
reference documentation.
Khlystov Alexandr пишет:
Good day.
Can anyone, please, give an example, or direct wicket API description
about remember me at login page feature.
Thanks in advance.
--
Khlystov Alexandr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicketstuff-core:jquery accordion broken?
Hi. Had same problem but found something at google: http://www.nabble.com/select-next-n-%22somethings%22-td21550403s27240.html Simply remove the '.r' from the expression and it will work. Best regards -- Marc Nuri hi currently the accordion in jquery-examples does not work in FF nor IE. jQuery.filter(e.rxpr, [i]) is undefined http://localhost:8080/resources/org.wicketstuff.jquery.accordion.JQAccordion/jquery.accordion.pack.js Line: 1 is this known, or should i try diggin in? about jquery anyway: i recognized that the jquery project in wstuff-core does not use the jslib project to define its dependency to the jquery lib. is this intended, or could/should it be changed? using wstuff-core/jslib would make it possible to combine components built on top of jquery from different projects without suffering. cu uwe
Re: ListMultipleChoice AbstactChoice methodclass access too strict?
i think a better solution would be to use ajaxsubmitbutton with defaultformprocessing=false, that way the LMC will keep the selection and its The Right Way to do it. -igor On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Mikko Pukki mikko.pu...@syncrontech.com wrote: Hi, I have a case where ListMultipleChoice is on a page and model of choices can change. To be more spesific, selected values can be moved up and down on a list. When ListMultipleChoice is updated via Ajax, selected items do not stay selected. I thought that overriding isSelected on a ListMultipleChoice would be a viable option (not pretty though), because I already have the selected objects cached elsewhere, so determing whether or not an object is selected would be trivial. But then I thought maybe I would be better to inherit a whole new implementation from AbstractChoice. Well, it could be done, but the class has package access to it, so no luck there. And if I override appendOptionHtml, it should be entirely rewritten. And it uses private fields (renderer, and setter for that is again final...) of AbstractChoice, so it makes things even more difficult. Could it be possible to change access to the AbstractChoice (is package access at all necessary?)? Or have I missed something obvious and maybe thinking this wrong way around? All I would like to do, is set correct objects on list as selected, but I guess that there is no any good way doing that. -- Mikko Pukki Syncron Tech Oy Laserkatu 6 53850 Lappeenranta +358 400 757 178 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: remember me at login page feature
With that being said, it has worked quite well for us using Spring
Security along with wicket-auth-roles. There really should be a
supported way to do authentication/authorization in Wicket, though.
Whenever folks ask the question about it, the canned response is it's
just an example; if you don't like it roll your own.
2009/5/6 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
if you search this list for wicket-auth-roles you will see that the
project is meant as an example, not as something for you to base your
project on. if some piece doesnt do what you want then roll your own
piece. the codebase is kept simple on purpose - it has to be easy to
read - because it is an example.
-igor
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Khlystov Alexandr a...@ovservice.org wrote:
Guys? if really nobody has implemented the auto-login via cookie, basing on
AuthenticatedWebApplication ???
Khlystov Alexandr пишет:
Hello all.
Previous answers did not helped me much. Though thanks authors for their
replies.
I am going to provide more detailed question:
My App extends AuthenticatedWebApplication {
And I want to implement auto-login/remember me feature.
More precisely - when user submits to browser URL for some Wicket page
(and user is not yet logged in) he should be able to see this page without
seeing SignInPage (if he set at previous session remember me check box at
SignInPage).
I can't understand how can I achive that with the
AuthenticatedWebApplication. How can I handle redirecting user to the
SignInPage at org.apache.wicket.authentication;AuthenticatedWebApplication
final method: onUnauthorizedInstantiation:
...
public final void onUnauthorizedInstantiation(final Component component)
{
// If there is a sign in page class declared, and the unauthorized
// component is a page, but it's not the sign in page
if (component instanceof Page)
{
if (!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn())
{
// Redirect to intercept page to let the user sign in
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
}
else
{
onUnauthorizedPage((Page)component);
}
}
else
{
// The component was not a page, so throw an exception
throw new
UnauthorizedInstantiationException(component.getClass());
}
}
...
As it is final I can't override the line:
...
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
...
to make setting SignInPage optional, depending on the cookie, and if
cookie is given from remember me checkbox - than to authenticate user just
by login retrieved from the cookie. And do not show SignInPage and do not do
any redirectToInterceptPage.
Thanks in advance!
P.S.
I think Wicket as a project requires more detailed and features-wide
reference documentation.
Khlystov Alexandr пишет:
Good day.
Can anyone, please, give an example, or direct wicket API description
about remember me at login page feature.
Thanks in advance.
--
Khlystov Alexandr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Spring Security's method security and Wicket
Hi, I'm having some trouble getting method security to work as expected using Spring Security together with Wicket, I have a thread about it over at the SpringSource forum: http://forum.springsource.org/showthread.php?t=71397 . Basically I have this situation: 1. Unauthenticated user submits a form, the onSubmit method calls a method in a Spring singleton which is secured using method security by a @Secured(NON_EXISTING_ROLE) annotation. 2. At this point, the method call is intercepted by Spring and I _think_ I should get the option to log in here. However I do not get this option, instead I'm shown a stack trace. I'm really banging my head against the wall here. I just wanted to ask here if this could have anything with the Wicket-Spring-IOC project? I would suspect no and that I'm to blame, but I'm also having a really hard time finding the source of the problem. If you have any tip for my as well I would really appreciate it! ;-) Best regards, Kent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: remember me at login page feature
we do have a supported way, its called IAuthorizationStrategy. there
are too many variations of what users need out there for us to
implement something useful because every one will try to bend it to
what they want and most likely fail and bitch about it. case and
point.
-igor
2009/5/6 James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com:
With that being said, it has worked quite well for us using Spring
Security along with wicket-auth-roles. There really should be a
supported way to do authentication/authorization in Wicket, though.
Whenever folks ask the question about it, the canned response is it's
just an example; if you don't like it roll your own.
2009/5/6 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
if you search this list for wicket-auth-roles you will see that the
project is meant as an example, not as something for you to base your
project on. if some piece doesnt do what you want then roll your own
piece. the codebase is kept simple on purpose - it has to be easy to
read - because it is an example.
-igor
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Khlystov Alexandr a...@ovservice.org wrote:
Guys? if really nobody has implemented the auto-login via cookie, basing on
AuthenticatedWebApplication ???
Khlystov Alexandr пишет:
Hello all.
Previous answers did not helped me much. Though thanks authors for their
replies.
I am going to provide more detailed question:
My App extends AuthenticatedWebApplication {
And I want to implement auto-login/remember me feature.
More precisely - when user submits to browser URL for some Wicket page
(and user is not yet logged in) he should be able to see this page without
seeing SignInPage (if he set at previous session remember me check box at
SignInPage).
I can't understand how can I achive that with the
AuthenticatedWebApplication. How can I handle redirecting user to the
SignInPage at org.apache.wicket.authentication;AuthenticatedWebApplication
final method: onUnauthorizedInstantiation:
...
public final void onUnauthorizedInstantiation(final Component component)
{
// If there is a sign in page class declared, and the unauthorized
// component is a page, but it's not the sign in page
if (component instanceof Page)
{
if (!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn())
{
// Redirect to intercept page to let the user sign in
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
}
else
{
onUnauthorizedPage((Page)component);
}
}
else
{
// The component was not a page, so throw an exception
throw new
UnauthorizedInstantiationException(component.getClass());
}
}
...
As it is final I can't override the line:
...
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
...
to make setting SignInPage optional, depending on the cookie, and if
cookie is given from remember me checkbox - than to authenticate user
just
by login retrieved from the cookie. And do not show SignInPage and do not
do
any redirectToInterceptPage.
Thanks in advance!
P.S.
I think Wicket as a project requires more detailed and features-wide
reference documentation.
Khlystov Alexandr пишет:
Good day.
Can anyone, please, give an example, or direct wicket API description
about remember me at login page feature.
Thanks in advance.
--
Khlystov Alexandr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Spring Security's method security and Wicket
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Kent Larsson kent.lars...@gmail.com wrote: 2. At this point, the method call is intercepted by Spring and I _think_ I should get the option to log in here. However I do not get this option, instead I'm shown a stack trace. how is (2) accomplished? -igor I'm really banging my head against the wall here. I just wanted to ask here if this could have anything with the Wicket-Spring-IOC project? I would suspect no and that I'm to blame, but I'm also having a really hard time finding the source of the problem. If you have any tip for my as well I would really appreciate it! ;-) Best regards, Kent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DateTextField design issue
we looked the one from wicket-extensions
Eyal Golan
egola...@gmail.com
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74
P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
what is the full name of this class? there are two DateTextField
classes in wicket codebase.
-igor
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Eyal Golan egola...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
We use Wicket 1.3.5 and I found something annoying with the
DateTextField.
In the constructor of that class, the converter is created internally.
If I want to use my own converter, I need to inherit DateTextField, add a
converter as a member, and return it in the getConverter method.
Why not have a protected method (that can be overridden) that returns the
converter:
Instead of:
public DateTextField(String id, IModel model, String datePattern)
{
super(id, model, Date.class);
this.datePattern = datePattern;
*this.converter = new DateConverter()
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.util.convert.converters.DateConverter#getDateFormat(java.util.Locale)
*/
public DateFormat getDateFormat(Locale locale)
{
return new
SimpleDateFormat(DateTextField.this.datePattern);
}
};*
}
Do something like:
public DateTextField(String id, IModel model, String datePattern)
{
super(id, model, Date.class);
this.datePattern = datePattern;
*this.converter = newDateConverter();*
}
and
protected newDateConverter() {
return new DateConverter()
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.util.convert.converters.DateConverter#getDateFormat(java.util.Locale)
*/
public DateFormat getDateFormat(Locale locale)
{
return new
SimpleDateFormat(DateTextField.this.datePattern);
}
};
}
BTW, I know that we can also use the newConverterLocator() in our
application.
Do you think I should open a JIRA issue with 'wish' for that?
Eyal Golan
egola...@gmail.com
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74
P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really
necessary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to manipulate values in a data table?
If it only can hold one value then an enum would be ok.
public interface Translatable{
public String getResourceKey();
}
public enum Status implements Translatable{
NOT_SENT( 0, resource.notsent ),
SENT( 1, resource.sent );
private int status;
private String resourceKey;
Status( int status, String resourceKey ){
this.status = status;
this.resourceKey = resourceKey;
}
public int getStatus(){
return status;
}
public String getResourceKey(){
return resourceKey;
}
}
If you use this in an DropDownChoice or want to use it in a label the
resourcekey should do the trick if the application is multilanguage
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-manipulate-values-in-a-data-table--tp23401292p23412644.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Maven setup
Hello Frank, I can't answer all the questions but... * I'm a 10+ year nearly Java only developer. I was initially very impressed with databinder but the only real support for databinder I could find is @: http://code.google.com/p/wicket-web-beans/ * I have 1.3.5 running in Eclipse (Ganymede) with Maven OK and I plan to upgrade to 1.3.6 as my new gig requires this framework. * Hibernate is a great ORM gadget but it is not 100% Java so PermGen space can be an issue. So, as an alternative you could investigate iBatis and I think Wicket also does well in the DAO arena. I'm only 100 pp into the WIA book so obviously you will need more folks chipping in with better experience. There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don’t (Valid only for 2's complement). - Original Message - From: Frank Tegtmeyer frank.tegtme...@online-systemhaus.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2009 5:47:25 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Maven setup Hi, does anybody have a Wicket quickstart project updated to the latest versions? I am new to Java, to Maven and to Wicket of course too. I have a background in web developing with Zope and Django (all implemented in Python) but am forced to use Java now. I know that the learning curve will be steep and I got some showstoppers already :) After reading much about many Java frameworks and some frustrating tests with JSF I've chosen Wicket because it fits my requirements best. I've done some tests with databinder which promoted Maven heavily, so I want to use Maven too. I'm still struggling with the whole setup - the following issues are still not clear to me: - Maven setup - Wicket dependency doesn't work for 1.3.5 nor for 1.3.6 although the website says so (data at the end of this message) Possibly another repository required? - integration with Eclipse - Maven goal or Eclipse plugin or both? - I want to use embedded Jetty also for production (running the application behind lighttpd). How to do deployment in an elegant way? There is only SSH access to my server. - Hibernate integration - does databinder help much or is it better to learn Hibernate directly? I saw that databinder always is somewhat behind the current versions, so that may be an issue. I hope these are not too stupid questions and someone will find the time to answer them. With kind regards, Frank The Maven dependency for wicket: dependency groupIdwicket/groupId artifactIdwicket/artifactId version1.3.5/version /dependency The error: [INFO]task-segment: [compile] [INFO] [INFO] [resources:resources] [WARNING] Using platform encoding (Cp1252 actually) to copy filtered resources, i.e. build is platform dependent! [INFO] Copying 1 resource Downloading: http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.3.5/wicket-1.3.5.pom [INFO] Unable to find resource 'wicket:wicket:pom:1.3.5' in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) [INFO] artifact wicket:wicket-extensions: checking for updates from central [INFO] artifact mysql:mysql-connector-java: checking for updates from central [INFO] artifact org.mortbay.jetty:jetty: checking for updates from central Downloading: http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.3.5/wicket-1.3.5.jar [INFO] Unable to find resource 'wicket:wicket:jar:1.3.5' in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Detaching models
hi
we have a problem here, which we think might be a common one, so i´d
like to discuss.
from time to time we create models (mostly LDMs) that are not actually
reachable by components. (yes, you can argue that this is stupid, but it
happens where 1:1 mapping between component and model is not easy to apply)
the problem arising from there is of course that wicket does not know
about this IModel and so wont detach() it.
yes, we could use Component.detach() as a hook to detach that LDM as
well, but i tend to forget that.
if there were a central place to register IDetachables, life would be
simpler. from what i´ve seen, detach is not guaranteed to be called only
once, so we could do:
MyAbstractReadOnlyModel(){
MyRequestCycle.get().registerForDetachment(this);}
and to
MyRequestCycle.detach(){
super.detach();
for(IDetachable d : this.setOfRegisteredIDetachables){
d.detach();
}
this.registeredIDetachables.clear();
...
as well as
MyRequestCycle.registerForDetachment(IDetachable d);
wouldn´t it make sense to have something like this in the framework?
one drawback is that direct implementations of IModel could not be
covered, but still it would be more convenient to just register them
somewhere instead of overwriting the detach methods of their containers
if we want them detached.
any thoughts, apart from the ones that claim this not to be a valid use
of IModel? :)
cu uwe
--
THOMAS DAILY GmbH
Adlerstraße 19
79098 Freiburg
Deutschland
T + 49 761 3 85 59 410
F + 49 761 3 85 59 550
E lar...@thomas-daily.de
www.thomas-daily.de
Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors:
Wendy Thomas, Susanne Larbig
Handelsregister Freiburg i.Br., HRB 3947
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Lazy Open Session In View with AOP
Hello, I want to use the Open Session In View Pattern with Wicket, but I don't want to open a Hibernate Session for every request like the ServletFilter approach does. I looked at the lazy-loading Open Session in View for JPA implementation from Wille Faler. http://faler.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/building-a-more-scalable-open-session-in-view/ He uses AOP instead of a ServletFilter to intercept only those method calls that need an EntityManager. My plan is to build something similar for Hibernate with Spring AOP. The solutions would consist of the following steps: 1. An aspect creates a new Hibernate Session, if a method is called, that needs one and none is already open. 2. The transaction runs. 3. The RequestCycle commits the transaction and closes the session. Or rollback, if an exception was thrown. Is something wrong with it? The Hibernate Reference says: When the transaction ends, either through commit or roll back, the current Session is closed automatically. https://www.hibernate.org/42.html#A6 This means that only one transaction can be executed in one request, right? But what is, if I need more than one transaction per request? Since I have to hold the session open during rendering, because of lazy loading, I cannot commit a transaction if I don't know another Session will be opened immediately and not to be closed until the end of the request cycle. Hibernate typically bounds the Session to the current thread. But was is the current thread in a Wicket Application? Are those threads pooled? Could the same session be used in two requests, when no commit happened? Thanks in advance, Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Lazy Open Session In View with AOP
spring has implemented itw own opensessioninview filter., i dont' think that you have to crete your own Spring has a class like this which you can declare in your web.xml OpenSessionInViewFilter On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Christian Helmbold christian.helmb...@yahoo.de wrote: Hello, I want to use the Open Session In View Pattern with Wicket, but I don't want to open a Hibernate Session for every request like the ServletFilter approach does. I looked at the lazy-loading Open Session in View for JPA implementation from Wille Faler. http://faler.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/building-a-more-scalable-open-session-in-view/ He uses AOP instead of a ServletFilter to intercept only those method calls that need an EntityManager. My plan is to build something similar for Hibernate with Spring AOP. The solutions would consist of the following steps: 1. An aspect creates a new Hibernate Session, if a method is called, that needs one and none is already open. 2. The transaction runs. 3. The RequestCycle commits the transaction and closes the session. Or rollback, if an exception was thrown. Is something wrong with it? The Hibernate Reference says: When the transaction ends, either through commit or roll back, the current Session is closed automatically. https://www.hibernate.org/42.html#A6 This means that only one transaction can be executed in one request, right? But what is, if I need more than one transaction per request? Since I have to hold the session open during rendering, because of lazy loading, I cannot commit a transaction if I don't know another Session will be opened immediately and not to be closed until the end of the request cycle. Hibernate typically bounds the Session to the current thread. But was is the current thread in a Wicket Application? Are those threads pooled? Could the same session be used in two requests, when no commit happened? Thanks in advance, Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Lazy Open Session In View with AOP
You can try using the filter, just set the singleSession property to false. On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Christian Helmbold christian.helmb...@yahoo.de wrote: Hello, I want to use the Open Session In View Pattern with Wicket, but I don't want to open a Hibernate Session for every request like the ServletFilter approach does. I looked at the lazy-loading Open Session in View for JPA implementation from Wille Faler. http://faler.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/building-a-more-scalable-open-session-in-view/ He uses AOP instead of a ServletFilter to intercept only those method calls that need an EntityManager. My plan is to build something similar for Hibernate with Spring AOP. The solutions would consist of the following steps: 1. An aspect creates a new Hibernate Session, if a method is called, that needs one and none is already open. 2. The transaction runs. 3. The RequestCycle commits the transaction and closes the session. Or rollback, if an exception was thrown. Is something wrong with it? The Hibernate Reference says: When the transaction ends, either through commit or roll back, the current Session is closed automatically. https://www.hibernate.org/42.html#A6 This means that only one transaction can be executed in one request, right? But what is, if I need more than one transaction per request? Since I have to hold the session open during rendering, because of lazy loading, I cannot commit a transaction if I don't know another Session will be opened immediately and not to be closed until the end of the request cycle. Hibernate typically bounds the Session to the current thread. But was is the current thread in a Wicket Application? Are those threads pooled? Could the same session be used in two requests, when no commit happened? Thanks in advance, Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Detaching models
In 1.5 Igor is planning on doing this. He's planning on making it
such that any IModel that your component holds as a field is
auto-detached.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
2009/5/6 Uwe Schäfer schae...@thomas-daily.de:
hi
we have a problem here, which we think might be a common one, so i´d like to
discuss.
from time to time we create models (mostly LDMs) that are not actually
reachable by components. (yes, you can argue that this is stupid, but it
happens where 1:1 mapping between component and model is not easy to apply)
the problem arising from there is of course that wicket does not know about
this IModel and so wont detach() it.
yes, we could use Component.detach() as a hook to detach that LDM as well,
but i tend to forget that.
if there were a central place to register IDetachables, life would be
simpler. from what i´ve seen, detach is not guaranteed to be called only
once, so we could do:
MyAbstractReadOnlyModel(){
MyRequestCycle.get().registerForDetachment(this);}
and to
MyRequestCycle.detach(){
super.detach();
for(IDetachable d : this.setOfRegisteredIDetachables){
d.detach();
}
this.registeredIDetachables.clear();
...
as well as
MyRequestCycle.registerForDetachment(IDetachable d);
wouldn´t it make sense to have something like this in the framework?
one drawback is that direct implementations of IModel could not be covered,
but still it would be more convenient to just register them somewhere
instead of overwriting the detach methods of their containers if we want
them detached.
any thoughts, apart from the ones that claim this not to be a valid use of
IModel? :)
cu uwe
--
THOMAS DAILY GmbH
Adlerstraße 19
79098 Freiburg
Deutschland
T + 49 761 3 85 59 410
F + 49 761 3 85 59 550
E lar...@thomas-daily.de
www.thomas-daily.de
Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors:
Wendy Thomas, Susanne Larbig
Handelsregister Freiburg i.Br., HRB 3947
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DropDownChoice with ChoiceRender problem
Thanks for the solution.
I found this post here (so the reader is getting off easy:)
http://steve-on-sakai.blogspot.com/2008/12/using-hashmap-with-dropdownchoice.html
-Original Message-
From: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2009 12:55pm
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: DropDownChoice with ChoiceRender problem
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Phillip Rhodes
spamsu...@rhoderunner.com wrote:
I want to display Yes to the user in the dropdown. If the user selects
Yes, I want address.handicapAccess string property to be set to Y
Do you still think a map-based rendererer is the way to go?
Yes, I would do it that way. That seems easiest to me. I do that
stuff sometimes and I declare my map to be static:
private static MapString,String CHOICES_MAP = new HashMapString,String();
static
{
CHOICES_MAP.put(Y, Yes);
CHOICES_MAP.put(N, No);
CHOICES_MAP.put(U, Unknown);
}
Then, just use your map in your renderer (I'll leave that exercise up
to the reader). You could even use resource keys instead of
hard-coded labels. That way, the Yes stuff would be in properties
files. Enjoy!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Maven setup
There's a basic installation guide for Maven, Eclipse, and Wicket on the wiki: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/windows-guide-to-installing-wicket-on-eclipse-with-maven.html Dane On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:36 AM, David Brown dbr...@sexingtechnologies.comwrote: Hello Frank, I can't answer all the questions but... * I'm a 10+ year nearly Java only developer. I was initially very impressed with databinder but the only real support for databinder I could find is @: http://code.google.com/p/wicket-web-beans/ * I have 1.3.5 running in Eclipse (Ganymede) with Maven OK and I plan to upgrade to 1.3.6 as my new gig requires this framework. * Hibernate is a great ORM gadget but it is not 100% Java so PermGen space can be an issue. So, as an alternative you could investigate iBatis and I think Wicket also does well in the DAO arena. I'm only 100 pp into the WIA book so obviously you will need more folks chipping in with better experience. There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don’t (Valid only for 2's complement). - Original Message - From: Frank Tegtmeyer frank.tegtme...@online-systemhaus.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2009 5:47:25 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Maven setup Hi, does anybody have a Wicket quickstart project updated to the latest versions? I am new to Java, to Maven and to Wicket of course too. I have a background in web developing with Zope and Django (all implemented in Python) but am forced to use Java now. I know that the learning curve will be steep and I got some showstoppers already :) After reading much about many Java frameworks and some frustrating tests with JSF I've chosen Wicket because it fits my requirements best. I've done some tests with databinder which promoted Maven heavily, so I want to use Maven too. I'm still struggling with the whole setup - the following issues are still not clear to me: - Maven setup - Wicket dependency doesn't work for 1.3.5 nor for 1.3.6 although the website says so (data at the end of this message) Possibly another repository required? - integration with Eclipse - Maven goal or Eclipse plugin or both? - I want to use embedded Jetty also for production (running the application behind lighttpd). How to do deployment in an elegant way? There is only SSH access to my server. - Hibernate integration - does databinder help much or is it better to learn Hibernate directly? I saw that databinder always is somewhat behind the current versions, so that may be an issue. I hope these are not too stupid questions and someone will find the time to answer them. With kind regards, Frank The Maven dependency for wicket: dependency groupIdwicket/groupId artifactIdwicket/artifactId version1.3.5/version /dependency The error: [INFO]task-segment: [compile] [INFO] [INFO] [resources:resources] [WARNING] Using platform encoding (Cp1252 actually) to copy filtered resources, i.e. build is platform dependent! [INFO] Copying 1 resource Downloading: http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.3.5/wicket-1.3.5.pom [INFO] Unable to find resource 'wicket:wicket:pom:1.3.5' in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) [INFO] artifact wicket:wicket-extensions: checking for updates from central [INFO] artifact mysql:mysql-connector-java: checking for updates from central [INFO] artifact org.mortbay.jetty:jetty: checking for updates from central Downloading: http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.3.5/wicket-1.3.5.jar [INFO] Unable to find resource 'wicket:wicket:jar:1.3.5' in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DropDownChoice with ChoiceRender problem
Darn it, Steve on Sakai! ;) Glad to help!
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Phillip Rhodes
spamsu...@rhoderunner.com wrote:
Thanks for the solution.
I found this post here (so the reader is getting off easy:)
http://steve-on-sakai.blogspot.com/2008/12/using-hashmap-with-dropdownchoice.html
-Original Message-
From: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2009 12:55pm
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: DropDownChoice with ChoiceRender problem
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Phillip Rhodes
spamsu...@rhoderunner.com wrote:
I want to display Yes to the user in the dropdown. If the user selects
Yes, I want address.handicapAccess string property to be set to Y
Do you still think a map-based rendererer is the way to go?
Yes, I would do it that way. That seems easiest to me. I do that
stuff sometimes and I declare my map to be static:
private static MapString,String CHOICES_MAP = new HashMapString,String();
static
{
CHOICES_MAP.put(Y, Yes);
CHOICES_MAP.put(N, No);
CHOICES_MAP.put(U, Unknown);
}
Then, just use your map in your renderer (I'll leave that exercise up
to the reader). You could even use resource keys instead of
hard-coded labels. That way, the Yes stuff would be in properties
files. Enjoy!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Detaching models
you can do this now, no need to wait for 1.5. simply create a
detachlistener that scans the class for imodel fields and detaches
them.
-igor
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
In 1.5 Igor is planning on doing this. He's planning on making it
such that any IModel that your component holds as a field is
auto-detached.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
2009/5/6 Uwe Schäfer schae...@thomas-daily.de:
hi
we have a problem here, which we think might be a common one, so i´d like to
discuss.
from time to time we create models (mostly LDMs) that are not actually
reachable by components. (yes, you can argue that this is stupid, but it
happens where 1:1 mapping between component and model is not easy to apply)
the problem arising from there is of course that wicket does not know about
this IModel and so wont detach() it.
yes, we could use Component.detach() as a hook to detach that LDM as well,
but i tend to forget that.
if there were a central place to register IDetachables, life would be
simpler. from what i´ve seen, detach is not guaranteed to be called only
once, so we could do:
MyAbstractReadOnlyModel(){
MyRequestCycle.get().registerForDetachment(this);}
and to
MyRequestCycle.detach(){
super.detach();
for(IDetachable d : this.setOfRegisteredIDetachables){
d.detach();
}
this.registeredIDetachables.clear();
...
as well as
MyRequestCycle.registerForDetachment(IDetachable d);
wouldn´t it make sense to have something like this in the framework?
one drawback is that direct implementations of IModel could not be covered,
but still it would be more convenient to just register them somewhere
instead of overwriting the detach methods of their containers if we want
them detached.
any thoughts, apart from the ones that claim this not to be a valid use of
IModel? :)
cu uwe
--
THOMAS DAILY GmbH
Adlerstraße 19
79098 Freiburg
Deutschland
T + 49 761 3 85 59 410
F + 49 761 3 85 59 550
E lar...@thomas-daily.de
www.thomas-daily.de
Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors:
Wendy Thomas, Susanne Larbig
Handelsregister Freiburg i.Br., HRB 3947
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
AW: Lazy Open Session In View with AOP
Thanks for your answer. I know the OpenSessionInViewFilterfrom Spring, but it opens a new Hibernate Session for every request even if you request an image. - Ursprüngliche Mail Von: Carlo Camerino cmcamer...@gmail.com An: users@wicket.apache.org Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 6. Mai 2009, 20:33:44 Uhr Betreff: Re: Lazy Open Session In View with AOP spring has implemented itw own opensessioninview filter., i dont' think that you have to crete your own Spring has a class like this which you can declare in your web.xml OpenSessionInViewFilter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Detaching models
Refer to the injection code to find out how to do the scanning.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
you can do this now, no need to wait for 1.5. simply create a
detachlistener that scans the class for imodel fields and detaches
them.
-igor
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
In 1.5 Igor is planning on doing this. He's planning on making it
such that any IModel that your component holds as a field is
auto-detached.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
2009/5/6 Uwe Schäfer schae...@thomas-daily.de:
hi
we have a problem here, which we think might be a common one, so i´d like to
discuss.
from time to time we create models (mostly LDMs) that are not actually
reachable by components. (yes, you can argue that this is stupid, but it
happens where 1:1 mapping between component and model is not easy to apply)
the problem arising from there is of course that wicket does not know about
this IModel and so wont detach() it.
yes, we could use Component.detach() as a hook to detach that LDM as well,
but i tend to forget that.
if there were a central place to register IDetachables, life would be
simpler. from what i´ve seen, detach is not guaranteed to be called only
once, so we could do:
MyAbstractReadOnlyModel(){
MyRequestCycle.get().registerForDetachment(this);}
and to
MyRequestCycle.detach(){
super.detach();
for(IDetachable d : this.setOfRegisteredIDetachables){
d.detach();
}
this.registeredIDetachables.clear();
...
as well as
MyRequestCycle.registerForDetachment(IDetachable d);
wouldn´t it make sense to have something like this in the framework?
one drawback is that direct implementations of IModel could not be covered,
but still it would be more convenient to just register them somewhere
instead of overwriting the detach methods of their containers if we want
them detached.
any thoughts, apart from the ones that claim this not to be a valid use of
IModel? :)
cu uwe
--
THOMAS DAILY GmbH
Adlerstraße 19
79098 Freiburg
Deutschland
T + 49 761 3 85 59 410
F + 49 761 3 85 59 550
E lar...@thomas-daily.de
www.thomas-daily.de
Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors:
Wendy Thomas, Susanne Larbig
Handelsregister Freiburg i.Br., HRB 3947
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Maven setup
And theres even two free books on maven http://www.sonatype.com/products/maven/documentation/book-defguide http://www.jroller.com/carlossg/entry/better_builds_with_maven_free I'd skip the parts about maestro and just use hudson or continium :) 2009/5/6 Dane Laverty danelave...@gmail.com: There's a basic installation guide for Maven, Eclipse, and Wicket on the wiki: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/windows-guide-to-installing-wicket-on-eclipse-with-maven.html Dane On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:36 AM, David Brown dbr...@sexingtechnologies.comwrote: Hello Frank, I can't answer all the questions but... * I'm a 10+ year nearly Java only developer. I was initially very impressed with databinder but the only real support for databinder I could find is @: http://code.google.com/p/wicket-web-beans/ * I have 1.3.5 running in Eclipse (Ganymede) with Maven OK and I plan to upgrade to 1.3.6 as my new gig requires this framework. * Hibernate is a great ORM gadget but it is not 100% Java so PermGen space can be an issue. So, as an alternative you could investigate iBatis and I think Wicket also does well in the DAO arena. I'm only 100 pp into the WIA book so obviously you will need more folks chipping in with better experience. There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don’t (Valid only for 2's complement). - Original Message - From: Frank Tegtmeyer frank.tegtme...@online-systemhaus.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2009 5:47:25 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Maven setup Hi, does anybody have a Wicket quickstart project updated to the latest versions? I am new to Java, to Maven and to Wicket of course too. I have a background in web developing with Zope and Django (all implemented in Python) but am forced to use Java now. I know that the learning curve will be steep and I got some showstoppers already :) After reading much about many Java frameworks and some frustrating tests with JSF I've chosen Wicket because it fits my requirements best. I've done some tests with databinder which promoted Maven heavily, so I want to use Maven too. I'm still struggling with the whole setup - the following issues are still not clear to me: - Maven setup - Wicket dependency doesn't work for 1.3.5 nor for 1.3.6 although the website says so (data at the end of this message) Possibly another repository required? - integration with Eclipse - Maven goal or Eclipse plugin or both? - I want to use embedded Jetty also for production (running the application behind lighttpd). How to do deployment in an elegant way? There is only SSH access to my server. - Hibernate integration - does databinder help much or is it better to learn Hibernate directly? I saw that databinder always is somewhat behind the current versions, so that may be an issue. I hope these are not too stupid questions and someone will find the time to answer them. With kind regards, Frank The Maven dependency for wicket: dependency groupIdwicket/groupId artifactIdwicket/artifactId version1.3.5/version /dependency The error: [INFO] task-segment: [compile] [INFO] [INFO] [resources:resources] [WARNING] Using platform encoding (Cp1252 actually) to copy filtered resources, i.e. build is platform dependent! [INFO] Copying 1 resource Downloading: http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.3.5/wicket-1.3.5.pom [INFO] Unable to find resource 'wicket:wicket:pom:1.3.5' in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) [INFO] artifact wicket:wicket-extensions: checking for updates from central [INFO] artifact mysql:mysql-connector-java: checking for updates from central [INFO] artifact org.mortbay.jetty:jetty: checking for updates from central Downloading: http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.3.5/wicket-1.3.5.jar [INFO] Unable to find resource 'wicket:wicket:jar:1.3.5' in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Maven setup
I really like better builds.. 2009/5/6 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: And theres even two free books on maven http://www.sonatype.com/products/maven/documentation/book-defguide http://www.jroller.com/carlossg/entry/better_builds_with_maven_free I'd skip the parts about maestro and just use hudson or continium :) 2009/5/6 Dane Laverty danelave...@gmail.com: There's a basic installation guide for Maven, Eclipse, and Wicket on the wiki: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/windows-guide-to-installing-wicket-on-eclipse-with-maven.html Dane On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:36 AM, David Brown dbr...@sexingtechnologies.comwrote: Hello Frank, I can't answer all the questions but... * I'm a 10+ year nearly Java only developer. I was initially very impressed with databinder but the only real support for databinder I could find is @: http://code.google.com/p/wicket-web-beans/ * I have 1.3.5 running in Eclipse (Ganymede) with Maven OK and I plan to upgrade to 1.3.6 as my new gig requires this framework. * Hibernate is a great ORM gadget but it is not 100% Java so PermGen space can be an issue. So, as an alternative you could investigate iBatis and I think Wicket also does well in the DAO arena. I'm only 100 pp into the WIA book so obviously you will need more folks chipping in with better experience. There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don’t (Valid only for 2's complement). - Original Message - From: Frank Tegtmeyer frank.tegtme...@online-systemhaus.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2009 5:47:25 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Maven setup Hi, does anybody have a Wicket quickstart project updated to the latest versions? I am new to Java, to Maven and to Wicket of course too. I have a background in web developing with Zope and Django (all implemented in Python) but am forced to use Java now. I know that the learning curve will be steep and I got some showstoppers already :) After reading much about many Java frameworks and some frustrating tests with JSF I've chosen Wicket because it fits my requirements best. I've done some tests with databinder which promoted Maven heavily, so I want to use Maven too. I'm still struggling with the whole setup - the following issues are still not clear to me: - Maven setup - Wicket dependency doesn't work for 1.3.5 nor for 1.3.6 although the website says so (data at the end of this message) Possibly another repository required? - integration with Eclipse - Maven goal or Eclipse plugin or both? - I want to use embedded Jetty also for production (running the application behind lighttpd). How to do deployment in an elegant way? There is only SSH access to my server. - Hibernate integration - does databinder help much or is it better to learn Hibernate directly? I saw that databinder always is somewhat behind the current versions, so that may be an issue. I hope these are not too stupid questions and someone will find the time to answer them. With kind regards, Frank The Maven dependency for wicket: dependency groupIdwicket/groupId artifactIdwicket/artifactId version1.3.5/version /dependency The error: [INFO] task-segment: [compile] [INFO] [INFO] [resources:resources] [WARNING] Using platform encoding (Cp1252 actually) to copy filtered resources, i.e. build is platform dependent! [INFO] Copying 1 resource Downloading: http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.3.5/wicket-1.3.5.pom [INFO] Unable to find resource 'wicket:wicket:pom:1.3.5' in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) [INFO] artifact wicket:wicket-extensions: checking for updates from central [INFO] artifact mysql:mysql-connector-java: checking for updates from central [INFO] artifact org.mortbay.jetty:jetty: checking for updates from central Downloading: http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.3.5/wicket-1.3.5.jar [INFO] Unable to find resource 'wicket:wicket:jar:1.3.5' in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:
AW: Lazy Open Session In View with AOP
Thanks for this hint. The Spring API doc says: If set to false, each data access operation or transaction will use its own session (like without Open Session in View). Each of those sessions will be registered for deferred close, though, actually processed at request completion. http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.5.x/api/org/springframework/orm/hibernate3/support/OpenSessionInViewFilter.html#setSingleSession(boolean) I don't understand who sessions are opened with this setting. - Ursprüngliche Mail Von: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com An: users@wicket.apache.org Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 6. Mai 2009, 20:34:27 Uhr Betreff: Re: Lazy Open Session In View with AOP You can try using the filter, just set the singleSession property to false. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Detaching models
James Carman schrieb: Refer to the injection code to find out how to do the scanning. you can do this now, no need to wait for 1.5. simply create a detachlistener that scans the class for imodel fields and detaches them. awesome. i was not aware of this one. thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to manipulate values in a data table?
Hello,
The easy way is to create a custom column and use that to convert the value.
i.e. extend ProperyColumn and override the protected IModel?
createLabelModel(IModelT rowModel) method such that it converts the
inner value (0 or 1) into the string value you want.
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
protected IModel? createLabelModel(IModelT rowModel)
{
// here we use a wrapping model that will convert the integer
value returned from the property model.
return new IntegerToStringModel (PropertyModel(rowModel,
propertyExpression), new String[] {Sent, Not Sent});
}
// this class converts the integer to one of the defined options.
public class IntegerToStringModel extends AbstractReadOnlyModelString {
private final IModelIntegerintegerModel;
private final String[]options;
/**
*
*/
public IntegerToStringModel(IModelInteger integerModel, String[]
options) {
this.integerModel = integerModel;
this.options = options;
// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
}
/*
* (non-Javadoc)
*
* @see org.apache.wicket.model.AbstractReadOnlyModel#getObject()
*/
@Override
public Object getObject() {
int value = this.integerModel.getObject();
switch (value) {
case 0:
return options[0];
case 1:
return options[1];
default:
return undefined;
}
}
}
Regards,
Mike
Hey,
I have a message class that has a status (which it is an integer)
to indicate whether the message has been sent successfully.
Inside a data table, how to handle this integer values so instead
of displaying 0 or 1, it displays Sent or Not Sent?
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Modifying LinkTree
Hi all, I'm using a LinkTree in my app, which is pretty much the SimpleTree implementation at Wicket Ajax Examples ( http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax/tree/simple.1 ), but I have to make it custom somehow. At this time the treenodes are links to different pages. The things, that I need to do with the tree: - some of the nodes are just containers, so I don't want to have a link to these items - if I'm using right click - open in new tab on a node, then the new tab will show me the same tree (just closed), not the page that I originally wanted to show. (Is this a bug or feature?) I'm quite new to Ajax, are there some good books out there about Ajax, from which I can learn things from the beginning? Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Peter Major - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Lazy Open Session In View with AOP
If you use the @Transactional annotation (or define your transactions in the XML), Spring will take care of the transactions for you automagically. On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Christian Helmbold christian.helmb...@yahoo.de wrote: Thanks for this hint. The Spring API doc says: If set to false, each data access operation or transaction will use its own session (like without Open Session in View). Each of those sessions will be registered for deferred close, though, actually processed at request completion. http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.5.x/api/org/springframework/orm/hibernate3/support/OpenSessionInViewFilter.html#setSingleSession(boolean) I don't understand who sessions are opened with this setting. - Ursprüngliche Mail Von: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com An: users@wicket.apache.org Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 6. Mai 2009, 20:34:27 Uhr Betreff: Re: Lazy Open Session In View with AOP You can try using the filter, just set the singleSession property to false. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Detaching models
Doesnt he say that the models arew really not reachable by the
components? So how would that field scanning then work? If it are
fields on components the currently the thing to do is simpel just make
sure that those fields are detached in the detach method of the
component that has those fields
On 06/05/2009, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
In 1.5 Igor is planning on doing this. He's planning on making it
such that any IModel that your component holds as a field is
auto-detached.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
2009/5/6 Uwe Schäfer schae...@thomas-daily.de:
hi
we have a problem here, which we think might be a common one, so i´d like
to
discuss.
from time to time we create models (mostly LDMs) that are not actually
reachable by components. (yes, you can argue that this is stupid, but it
happens where 1:1 mapping between component and model is not easy to
apply)
the problem arising from there is of course that wicket does not know
about
this IModel and so wont detach() it.
yes, we could use Component.detach() as a hook to detach that LDM as well,
but i tend to forget that.
if there were a central place to register IDetachables, life would be
simpler. from what i´ve seen, detach is not guaranteed to be called only
once, so we could do:
MyAbstractReadOnlyModel(){
MyRequestCycle.get().registerForDetachment(this);}
and to
MyRequestCycle.detach(){
super.detach();
for(IDetachable d : this.setOfRegisteredIDetachables){
d.detach();
}
this.registeredIDetachables.clear();
...
as well as
MyRequestCycle.registerForDetachment(IDetachable d);
wouldn´t it make sense to have something like this in the framework?
one drawback is that direct implementations of IModel could not be
covered,
but still it would be more convenient to just register them somewhere
instead of overwriting the detach methods of their containers if we want
them detached.
any thoughts, apart from the ones that claim this not to be a valid use of
IModel? :)
cu uwe
--
THOMAS DAILY GmbH
Adlerstraße 19
79098 Freiburg
Deutschland
T + 49 761 3 85 59 410
F + 49 761 3 85 59 550
E lar...@thomas-daily.de
www.thomas-daily.de
Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors:
Wendy Thomas, Susanne Larbig
Handelsregister Freiburg i.Br., HRB 3947
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Spring Security's method security and Wicket
I don't know. I guess something like: 1. Record the request data (like with URL interception) then let the method call fail roll-back transactions 2. Show log in page 3. Play the recorded request and hope the call was determenistic But maybe I just misinterpreted him. Or maybe it would work with Spring MVC if they have this built into their architecture. But it sounds strange so I understand why you ask. Best regards, Kent On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Kent Larsson kent.lars...@gmail.com wrote: 2. At this point, the method call is intercepted by Spring and I _think_ I should get the option to log in here. However I do not get this option, instead I'm shown a stack trace. how is (2) accomplished? -igor I'm really banging my head against the wall here. I just wanted to ask here if this could have anything with the Wicket-Spring-IOC project? I would suspect no and that I'm to blame, but I'm also having a really hard time finding the source of the problem. If you have any tip for my as well I would really appreciate it! ;-) Best regards, Kent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Detaching models
i thought not reachable means they are not in any default model slot...dunno
-igor
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
Doesnt he say that the models arew really not reachable by the
components? So how would that field scanning then work? If it are
fields on components the currently the thing to do is simpel just make
sure that those fields are detached in the detach method of the
component that has those fields
On 06/05/2009, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
In 1.5 Igor is planning on doing this. He's planning on making it
such that any IModel that your component holds as a field is
auto-detached.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
2009/5/6 Uwe Schäfer schae...@thomas-daily.de:
hi
we have a problem here, which we think might be a common one, so i´d like
to
discuss.
from time to time we create models (mostly LDMs) that are not actually
reachable by components. (yes, you can argue that this is stupid, but it
happens where 1:1 mapping between component and model is not easy to
apply)
the problem arising from there is of course that wicket does not know
about
this IModel and so wont detach() it.
yes, we could use Component.detach() as a hook to detach that LDM as well,
but i tend to forget that.
if there were a central place to register IDetachables, life would be
simpler. from what i´ve seen, detach is not guaranteed to be called only
once, so we could do:
MyAbstractReadOnlyModel(){
MyRequestCycle.get().registerForDetachment(this);}
and to
MyRequestCycle.detach(){
super.detach();
for(IDetachable d : this.setOfRegisteredIDetachables){
d.detach();
}
this.registeredIDetachables.clear();
...
as well as
MyRequestCycle.registerForDetachment(IDetachable d);
wouldn´t it make sense to have something like this in the framework?
one drawback is that direct implementations of IModel could not be
covered,
but still it would be more convenient to just register them somewhere
instead of overwriting the detach methods of their containers if we want
them detached.
any thoughts, apart from the ones that claim this not to be a valid use of
IModel? :)
cu uwe
--
THOMAS DAILY GmbH
Adlerstraße 19
79098 Freiburg
Deutschland
T + 49 761 3 85 59 410
F + 49 761 3 85 59 550
E lar...@thomas-daily.de
www.thomas-daily.de
Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors:
Wendy Thomas, Susanne Larbig
Handelsregister Freiburg i.Br., HRB 3947
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Inmethod Grid - adding / removing columns
I just implemented the inmethod grid control (very cool, btw) and I'm looking for a way to add and remove columns to the grid using DnD. What I envision is a div opening above the grid with a list of available columns. The user can then drag the columns onto the grid (ideally into the exact position they want the column to be in). In addition they could drag columns from the grid onto this div. It looks like the grid is using some yui functionality, so I thought having a org.wicketstuff.yui.markup.html.sortable.SortableList and a repeating view for the availableColumns list, or something like that. I don't see any exposed methods in the grid functionality to process the drop functionality, though. Before I go too far down this path, can somebody give me some insight as to how I can go about accomplishing this? If I can just get an onDrop method to fire when moving items back and forth, the rest should be straight forward (adding/removing the column and refreshing the data). Thanks very much. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
radiochoice and propertymodel ignoring converter (wicket 1.3.5)
I have a custom converter registered for Boolean.class that converts yes
to Boolean(true) and no to Boolean(false). When the RadioChoice loads the
converter is never called.
code
private static final ListString IRREGULAR_HEARTBEAT =
Arrays.asList(newString[] {
yes, no });
RadioChoice irregular = new RadioChoice(irregularHeartbeat,
newPropertyModel(bloodPressure,
irregularHeartbeat), IRREGULAR_HEARTBEAT).setSuffix( );
BloodPressure Object:
public Boolean isIrregularHeartbeat() {
return bloodPressure.isIrregularHeartbeat();
}
public void setIrregularHeartbeat(Boolean value) {
bloodPressure.setIrregularHeartbeat(value);
}
/code
Thanks,
--jim
Re: radiochoice and propertymodel ignoring converter (wicket 1.3.5)
that kind of conversion should go into ichoicerenderer implementation.
the converter is used to convert between browser's on/ values to
true and false.
this is the sig of the constructor from 1.4, hopefully generics will
clear up how this works for you
public RadioChoice(final String id, IModelT model, final List?
extends T choices, IChoiceRendererT renderer)
in your case T is Boolean.
-igor
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:18 PM, james o'brien jobr...@spinnphr.com wrote:
I have a custom converter registered for Boolean.class that converts yes
to Boolean(true) and no to Boolean(false). When the RadioChoice loads the
converter is never called.
code
private static final ListString IRREGULAR_HEARTBEAT =
Arrays.asList(newString[] {
yes, no });
RadioChoice irregular = new RadioChoice(irregularHeartbeat,
newPropertyModel(bloodPressure,
irregularHeartbeat), IRREGULAR_HEARTBEAT).setSuffix( );
BloodPressure Object:
public Boolean isIrregularHeartbeat() {
return bloodPressure.isIrregularHeartbeat();
}
public void setIrregularHeartbeat(Boolean value) {
bloodPressure.setIrregularHeartbeat(value);
}
/code
Thanks,
--jim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Detaching models
Igor Vaynberg schrieb: i thought not reachable means they are not in any default model slot...dunno yep, that´s what i meant. sorry i wasn´t clear on that one. using the listener to test the fields for IDetachable works pretty well. thanks again. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Detaching models
Johan Compagner schrieb: If it are fields on components the currently the thing to do is simpel just make sure that those fields are detached in the detach method of the component that has those fields sure, but this is quite easy to forget (that´s what i´m good at), so doing it from the Listener looks much safer to me :) thanks, uwe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Detaching models
the standard way to handle this is to override component's ondetach() and call detach() on the models directly. -igor 2009/5/6 Uwe Schäfer u...@thomas-daily.de: Johan Compagner schrieb: If it are fields on components the currently the thing to do is simpel just make sure that those fields are detached in the detach method of the component that has those fields sure, but this is quite easy to forget (that´s what i´m good at), so doing it from the Listener looks much safer to me :) thanks, uwe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Detaching models
And for detecting if you did detach everything you could use a serializable checker and/or specific object checker that will test your complete page after it is detached. (or should be detached) On 07/05/2009, Uwe Schäfer u...@thomas-daily.de wrote: Johan Compagner schrieb: If it are fields on components the currently the thing to do is simpel just make sure that those fields are detached in the detach method of the component that has those fields sure, but this is quite easy to forget (that´s what i´m good at), so doing it from the Listener looks much safer to me :) thanks, uwe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: remember me at login page feature
Thanks, Igor.
Now it is getting clear. Unfortunaотлиly I can't
distinguish library to use from library to use and
modify. I mean since I'm quite new to wicket, it is questionable
step to modify wicket API, because I don't know what else I need can be
based on this functionality.
if you search this list for
wicket-auth-roles you will see that the
project is meant as an
example, not as something for you to base your
project on. if
some piece doesnt do what you want then roll your own
piece. the
codebase is kept simple on purpose - it has to be easy to
read -
because it is an example.
-igor
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Khlystov Alexandr
a...@ovservice.org
wrote:
Guys? if really nobody has implemented the auto-login via cookie,
basing
on
AuthenticatedWebApplication ???
Khlystov Alexandr пишет:
Hello all.
Previous
answers did not helped me much. Though thanks authors for
their
replies.
I am going to provide more detailed question:
My App extends
AuthenticatedWebApplication {
And I
want to implement auto-login/remember me feature.
More
precisely - when user submits to browser URL for some Wicket page
(and user is not yet logged in) he should be able to see
this page
without
seeing SignInPage
(if he set at previous session remember me check
box at
SignInPage).
I can't understand how can I achive that with the
AuthenticatedWebApplication. How can I handle redirecting
user to the
SignInPage at
org.apache.wicket.authentication;AuthenticatedWebApplication
final method: onUnauthorizedInstantiation:
...
public final void
onUnauthorizedInstantiation(final Component
component)
{
// If there is a
sign in page class declared, and the
unauthorized
// component is a page, but it's not the sign in
page
if (component instanceof Page)
{
if
(!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn())
{
// Redirect to intercept page to let the
user sign in
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
}
else
{
onUnauthorizedPage((Page)component);
}
}
else
{
// The component was not a page, so throw
an exception
throw new
UnauthorizedInstantiationException(component.getClass());
}
}
...
As it is final I can't override the
line:
...
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
...
to make setting
SignInPage optional, depending on the cookie, and if
cookie is given from remember me checkbox - than to
authenticate user
just
by login
retrieved from the cookie. And do not show SignInPage and do
not do
any
redirectToInterceptPage.
Thanks in advance!
P.S.
I think Wicket as a project requires more detailed and
features-wide
reference documentation.
Khlystov Alexandr пишет:
Good day.
Can anyone, please, give an
example, or direct wicket API description
about
remember me at login page feature.
Thanks in advance.
--
Khlystov Alexandr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
___
Best regards, Khlystov Alexandr.
mailto:
a...@ovservice.org
Re: remember me at login page feature
you can take the entire wicket-auth-roles source and paste it into
your project, then start hacking away.
-igor
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Khlystov Alexandr a...@ovservice.org wrote:
Thanks, Igor.
Now it is getting clear. Unfortunaотлиly I can't
distinguish library to use from library to use and
modify. I mean since I'm quite new to wicket, it is questionable
step to modify wicket API, because I don't know what else I need can be
based on this functionality.
if you search this list for
wicket-auth-roles you will see that the
project is meant as an
example, not as something for you to base your
project on. if
some piece doesnt do what you want then roll your own
piece. the
codebase is kept simple on purpose - it has to be easy to
read -
because it is an example.
-igor
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Khlystov Alexandr
a...@ovservice.org
wrote:
Guys? if really nobody has implemented the auto-login via cookie,
basing
on
AuthenticatedWebApplication ???
Khlystov Alexandr пишет:
Hello all.
Previous
answers did not helped me much. Though thanks authors for
their
replies.
I am going to provide more detailed question:
My App extends
AuthenticatedWebApplication {
And I
want to implement auto-login/remember me feature.
More
precisely - when user submits to browser URL for some Wicket page
(and user is not yet logged in) he should be able to see
this page
without
seeing SignInPage
(if he set at previous session remember me check
box at
SignInPage).
I can't understand how can I achive that with the
AuthenticatedWebApplication. How can I handle redirecting
user to the
SignInPage at
org.apache.wicket.authentication;AuthenticatedWebApplication
final method: onUnauthorizedInstantiation:
...
public final void
onUnauthorizedInstantiation(final Component
component)
{
// If there is a
sign in page class declared, and the
unauthorized
// component is a page, but it's not the sign in
page
if (component instanceof Page)
{
if
(!AuthenticatedWebSession.get().isSignedIn())
{
// Redirect to intercept page to let the
user sign in
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
}
else
{
onUnauthorizedPage((Page)component);
}
}
else
{
// The component was not a page, so throw
an exception
throw new
UnauthorizedInstantiationException(component.getClass());
}
}
...
As it is final I can't override the
line:
...
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(getSignInPageClass());
...
to make setting
SignInPage optional, depending on the cookie, and if
cookie is given from remember me checkbox - than to
authenticate user
just
by login
retrieved from the cookie. And do not show SignInPage and do
not do
any
redirectToInterceptPage.
Thanks in advance!
P.S.
I think Wicket as a project requires more detailed and
features-wide
reference documentation.
Khlystov Alexandr пишет:
Good day.
Can anyone, please, give an
example, or direct wicket API description
about
remember me at login page feature.
Thanks in advance.
--
Khlystov Alexandr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
___
Best regards, Khlystov Alexandr.
mailto:
a...@ovservice.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
non-existent Springbean lazy beans only work when name specified
I think I've found a potential bug/ area for improvement.
We are setting up pure unit tests for a component, and in this test
case, although the component declares several @SpringBean's, only 1 is
used. Our tests all work fine when we run them against our test
spring context, but I wanted to do something more isolated...
So, in our custom injector, we only inject the, let's call it,
TemplatesDao object. The other 'dao's or whatever, remain un-attended
to.
This runs fine, in one case, where we specify the names of the beans -
i.e. @SpringBean(name=templateDao), @SpringBean(name=peopleDao),
etc, where we ignore the peopleDao bean for example. The fields are
all set to lazy proxy's, and the actual resolution of the bean only
happens on first access - so, our peopleDao is never looked up (which
wouldn't work, because it's not there), and our templateDao get's
looked up successfully.
However, if we do not specify the name of the bean - i.e. with have
another bean @SpringBean of type RoomsDao. When the wicket code goes
to setup this field's lazy initialiser, it fails. It turns down the
wrong road at:
SpringBeanLocator:
singletonCache =
Boolean.valueOf(getSpringContext().isSingleton(getBeanName()));
which leads to the:
String[] names =
BeanFactoryUtils.beanNamesForTypeIncludingAncestors(ctx, clazz);
This of course calls the getBeanName(). And because we didn't specify
a name, the injector tries to ask Spring for it - which of course
doesn't work, because no bean of that type actually exists in the
conext.
IMO the treatment of named vs unnamed @SringBeans is thus sort of
inconsistent, and would be useful for us to be able to not worry about
unnamed bean types not existing. Is there a way to avoid this call
into the Spring context?
One of the work arounds we can use for this, is to add a mock
implementation of that class into the test application context, so
spring is able to find a bean of that type. But I'd prefer not to have
to :)
The other work around, is to not use the SpringComponentInjector, and
instead setup our own ComponentInjector which only cares about the one
panel we're testing:
@Override
public void onInstantiation(Component component) {
if (component instanceof ProfileDetailPanel) {
ProfileDetailPanel p = (ProfileDetailPanel) component;
p.setProfileManager( mockProfileManager );
}
}
I wanted to get some thoughts, before I posted a Jira.
Regards,
Antony Stubbs,
NZ
http://friendfeed.com/astubbs
