Looking at the package name I think you are using Wicket 1.2.
Consider upgrade to 1.3.6 or even 1.4-rc4.
About the question: yes, it is possible. Wrap the words with span
style=color: #xxword/span and call
multiLineLabel.setEscapeModelStrings(false)
El mar, 12-05-2009 a las 13:00 +0200,
;-)
If in a soft wall room they hear you taking about tomcat (what kind
of a cat?), hot-swapping, well, aeh, ... they might keep you a
little longer...
On 05.05.2009, at 13:23, nino martinez wael wrote:
I like these kind of monologs, I often do them myself also known as
parrot talks :)
I've been using http://storytestiq.solutionsiq.com/ STiQ for integration
testing on my current project. It's a mashup of Selenium Fitnesse. It
makes for a really comfortable test construction running environment.
I've used JUnit driven Selenium tests in the past, but the tests were
Hi Michael, thank you for your suggestion.
what do you think about overriding the AbstractColumn#populateItem() to add
a Label to the cellItem and setting up a proper IConverter to that
component?
bye
alf
Michael O'Cleirigh wrote:
This question came up last week aswell, here is an
When I try this code it works. Can you please post some code for us
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/CheckboxMultipleChoice-in-Ajax-style-tp23458553p23520363.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I always get this for a new app when I run/build it from Eclipse or
IntelliJ. Both default to exclude resources from the java packages.
Build with Maven (change the pom or use quickstart to start with a
correct pom) and the file should be there.
Regards,
Erik.
Tomáš Mihok wrote:
Hi
You can set up IntelliJ to not exclude them. Just go to the compiler
properties for your project and set the exclude to something like
!?*.java.
2009/5/13 Erik van Oosten e.vanoos...@grons.nl:
I always get this for a new app when I run/build it from Eclipse or
IntelliJ. Both default to exclude
I found the solutionit is not a wicket problem. The problem was in my
CSS files.
marius1maru wrote:
Hello,
I'm using a ListView of links limited to only 5 links, an
AjaxFallbackLink (showMore) that will remove the limitation, and another
AjaxFallbackLink
(showLess) that will
Problem:
I want to validate input as user types it, but validation takes a long time
on the server. When validation result for the first input is returned, user
might have caused several more input events to be validated. These
validation requests are pending execution on Wicket Ajax Channel. At
hard to say without having something to play against.
-igor
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Hi!
I have a data object Dummy whose attribute value has a setMethod
(setValue) that does not allow the given value to be an empty string
or
Ok, I was hoping someone has experienced the same stacktrace.
I will try to reproduce the bug still, maybe I find something.
**
Martin
2009/5/13 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
hard to say without having something to play against.
-igor
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Martin
Hi, I will be compiling wicketstuff-dojo with a dependency on wicket
1.3.4 for an internal project. Does anyone know if there are any
integration issues between those two versions?
Alternatively, is there a better component to use for a
floating div than DojoFloatingPane? I did notice that
How can one override properties in Fragments?
Given a component:
divwicket:message key=foo//div
which I instantiate twice, say, in
div wicket:id=c1 /
wicket:fragment id=fragment
div wicket:id=c2 /
/wicket:fragment/
I can override c1's property foo via
c1.foo=Bar
but neither
Good questoin - I'm not sure how that works with wicket:message. But
I suppose you could easily add a label to the fragment and control the
property key to your label easily
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Kaspar Fischer h...@rapsak.com
Hello,I have a converter which I can verify is being called, but when the
validator is being called it is not being called on the String value but the
object which causes a ClassCastException.
Here is my converter:
@Override
protected IConverterLocator newConverterLocator() {
ConverterLocator
I think Igor meant for you to post some code.
cheers,
Steve
On 13 May 2009, at 17:27, Martin Makundi wrote:
Ok, I was hoping someone has experienced the same stacktrace.
I will try to reproduce the bug still, maybe I find something.
**
Martin
2009/5/13 Igor Vaynberg
I think Igor meant for you to post some code.
There's nothing special..
form = new form
form.add(nestedform = new form)
nestedform.add(new textfield(propertymodel).setRequired(true));
It works most of the time, but sometimes I get the exception.
**
Martin
cheers,
Steve
On 13 May
validators work on objects not on raw string values.
-igor
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:00 AM, james o'brien jobr...@spinnphr.com wrote:
Hello,I have a converter which I can verify is being called, but when the
validator is being called it is not being called on the String value but the
object
Hi Igor,
I'm a little confused. I attached a StringValidator - shouldn't that work
on a String?
--jim
igor.vaynberg wrote:
validators work on objects not on raw string values.
-igor
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:00 AM, james o'brien jobr...@spinnphr.com
wrote:
Hello,I have a converter
no, validators work on a converted type - same type as the model object
notice your converter is converting the value to a codablevalue type -
that is the object that the validators will work on - they validate
the same object that will be put into the model if validation passes.
it looks like
Hello Günther,
stiq looks very promising. Can you please provide some small snippets
howto use it in correlation with wicket?
Cheers
Per
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands,
Hi Igor,
I'm a little confused. I attached a StringValidator - shouldn't that work
on a String? Also I assumed Validators work on the values of form fields
after converted to String?Thanks,
--jim
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:00 AM, james o'brien jobr...@spinnphr.comwrote:
Hello,I have a
Yeah or just another way of thinking.. :)
2009/5/11 Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca:
Thanks that worked... although its a bit of a pain in the behind :)
- Brill Pappin
On 11-May-09, at 6:55 AM, nino martinez wael wrote:
You do something like this:
// compound model
private final
I see, thanks.
-jim
igor.vaynberg wrote:
no, validators work on a converted type - same type as the model object
notice your converter is converting the value to a codablevalue type -
that is the object that the validators will work on - they validate
the same object that will be put
On 13.05.2009, at 18:40, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Good questoin - I'm not sure how that works with wicket:message. But
I suppose you could easily add a label to the fragment and control the
property key to your label easily
Programmatically, you mean, right? Using Component#getString()
not getString
new Label(label, new ResourceModel(yourkey));
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Kaspar Fischer h...@rapsak.com wrote:
On 13.05.2009, at 18:40, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Good questoin - I'm not sure how that works with
Hello,I have a converter which I can verify is being called, but when the
validator is being called it is not being called on the String value but the
object which causes a ClassCastException.
Here is my converter:
@Override
protected IConverterLocator newConverterLocator() {
ConverterLocator
i am guessing . is a special char in hybrid strategy so it should
escape it. a patch would be welcome, and at least a jira issue.
-igor
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
any thoughts? thanks
On May 7, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
I'm using
Fellow Wicketeers,
Please see the discussion at TSS about this framework:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=54535
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Jim Xie jim.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Wicket Users,
Dreamsource ORM has been used in three major applications for over
Is that a way of saying please don't spend wicket users bandwidth
with 100+ explanations of why this is not a good ORM for any
reasonably complex use case? :)
Oops, too late.
-Clint
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:07 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Fellow Wicketeers,
Please
lets keep this list reserved for wicket-related flamewars only, keep
the other ones on tss :)
-igor
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Clint Popetz cl...@42lines.net wrote:
Is that a way of saying please don't spend wicket users bandwidth
with 100+ explanations of why this is not a good ORM for
I'd actually rather it worked as expected and simply set the object on
the model property :)
However, it's usable so I'll live with it.
- brill
On 13-May-09, at 3:10 PM, nino martinez wael wrote:
Yeah or just another way of thinking.. :)
2009/5/11 Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca:
Thanks that
32 matches
Mail list logo
