Re: Good way to remove validation globally from a page or panel
When you are in View mode then either your components are not form components (e.g. input is replaced with label/span/...) or as you said they are disabled. Form submit will not send name/value pair for disabled form elements. I think the first approach is better regarding user experience. See visural's view or edit components for example. On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS] berlin.br...@primerica.com wrote: If I am using AbstractFormValidator and in some places, I am using setRequired, default validation on components. What is the best way to remove the validation temporarily Let's say I am in a view only mode and fields are disabled, I want to remove validation. And then later on, may add back that validation. I guess I Could remove and add onBeforeRender or initialize or configure and then add the validators back. I was trying to avoid doin that. I would have to remove validation on all the components on those particular pages. Also, I was thinking of just exiting early in the validation methods? Also, let's say I have some fields that are disabled and some that aren't. I am using abstractformvalidator and throwing an error if those fields are empty. They are empty but disabled. Is there a way to treat disabled fields differently in validation modes..
Re: Page#onInitialize is final in 1.5RC2 ?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3218 There is a thread in the mailing list. Search in Nabble. On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Page#onInitialize is final in 1.5RC2 i think this method ment to be overridden? am i missing something? Thanks
Re: DropDown replacing text field
Use two wicket:fragments - one with input inside, and one with select
Swap the fragments
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Arjun Dhar dhar...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
i have a markup (Loop) for a couple of fields. Its a dynamic form and all
the fields are text except one or two,
Sample Markup:
Now in the Java code, for the exceptional case I want to replace that
'input' with 'select', so I did:
field = new DropDownChoice(value, new Model(myBooleanvar),
Arrays.asList(Boolean.FALSE,
Boolean.TRUE)) {
//Default is text type,
change to select
@Override
public void
onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
tag.setName(select);
tag.remove(type);
super.onComponentTag( tag );
}
};
..this results in a Blank Drop Down Box withotu any values.
In the markup if I make it select it obviously works.
What else do I need to to do to get the options, in the list in such a
case?
-
Don't take life too seriously, your'e not getting out it alive anyway!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DropDown-replacing-text-field-tp3336347p3336347.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DropDown replacing text field
Thanks...but curiosity : why wont that work in the first place? - Don't take life too seriously, your'e not getting out it alive anyway! -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DropDown-replacing-text-field-tp3336347p3336426.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DropDown replacing text field
(And whats wrong with Nabble ..its got this annoying Ajax interface) :( Ugh!!! - Don't take life too seriously, your'e not getting out it alive anyway! -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DropDown-replacing-text-field-tp3336347p3336427.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Good way to remove validation globally from a page or panel
I should have clarified.
Yea, if you have input fields with a dozen or so fields and you have 50%
disabled. But you are using the AbstractFormValidator validate() {
get(field1).getInput; get(field2).getInput ... And doing validation
checks, I guess this isn't a good approach.
I have to keep the fields disabled and can't use true/read only spans.
I could visit each field and check if the component is enabled or not,
but I was trying to see if there is a one liner, easy solution that I
could remove validation in a disabled state...if I use the validation
approach I mention above.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 3:59 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Good way to remove validation globally from a page or panel
When you are in View mode then either your components are not form
components (e.g. input is replaced with label/span/...) or as you
said they are disabled. Form submit will not send name/value pair for
disabled form elements.
I think the first approach is better regarding user experience.
See visural's view or edit components for example.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS]
berlin.br...@primerica.com wrote:
If I am using AbstractFormValidator and in some places, I am using
setRequired, default validation on components. What is the best way
to remove the validation temporarily Let's say I am in a view only
mode and fields are disabled, I want to remove validation. And then
later on, may add back that validation. I guess I Could remove and
add onBeforeRender or initialize or configure and then add the
validators
back. I was trying to avoid doin that. I would have to remove
validation on all the components on those particular pages. Also, I
was thinking of just exiting early in the validation methods?
Also, let's say I have some fields that are disabled and some that
aren't. I am using abstractformvalidator and throwing an error if
those fields are empty. They are empty but disabled. Is there a way
to treat disabled fields differently in validation modes..
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Servlet Mapping Expectations
Hi, I have following settings in web.xml servlet-mapping servlet-namemyserv/servlet-name url-pattern/app/*/url-pattern /servlet-mapping I expect that all requests such as: /app /app/abc /app/xyz should come to the servlet. But only /app currently works. Moreover, I want to access the getRequestURL part from the servlet API also, so that i can use the information in the application logic. I am able to do this in the normal servlet and then forward the request to the wicket but in that case the URL at the client remains the same and causes problems later in the application. thanks devush - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Servlet Mapping Expectations
Hi, On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 4:03 PM, devush devushan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have following settings in web.xml servlet-mapping servlet-namemyserv/servlet-name url-pattern/app/*/url-pattern /servlet-mapping I expect that all requests such as: /app /app/abc /app/xyz should come to the servlet. But only /app currently works. They actually come but since you don't have mounts at /abc or /xyz Wicket decides there is nothing to do for them. /app matches on the App's home page. Moreover, I want to access the getRequestURL part from the servlet API also, so that i can use the information in the application logic. I am able to do this in the normal servlet and then forward the request to the wicket but in that case the URL at the client remains the same and causes problems later in the application. See if Wicket's Request#getPath() (Wicket 1.4.x) or #getUrl() (Wicket 1.5.x) returns what you need. Otherwise you can always use the underlying HttpServletRequest: - 1.4.x - WebRequest#getHttpServletRequest() - 1.5.x - (HttpServletRequest) Request#getContainerRequest() thanks devush - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Panel factories and @SpringBean
http://wicketinaction.com/2008/10/creating-pluggable-applications-with-wicket-and-spring/
-igor
2011/3/4 Leszek Gawron lgaw...@apache.org:
Hello,
Let's say I want to write some UI to edit some complicated configuration
split into multiple entities in multiple maven modules. The UI needs to have
one entry point though. So:
Let's create the UI based on TabbedPanel. Each of the tabs will be provided
by different maven modules by the means of factories:
public interface JukeboxConfigPanelFactory extends Ordered {
public IModelString getPanelTitle();
public Panel getPanel( String id, IModelJukebox jukeboxModel );
}
Provided that I have a list of all panel factories (that is an actual
problem!) I can do that:
ListITab tabs = new ArrayListITab();
for ( JukeboxConfigPanelFactory factory :
getPanelFactories() ) {
tabs.add( new
JukeboxConfigPanelFactoryAwareAbstractTab( factory, getJukeboxModel() ) );
}
add( new AjaxTabbedPanel( tabs, tabs ) );
The problem is: HOW do I get all the panel factories defined in Spring
context?
I cannot do :
@SpringBean
private ListJukeboxConfigPanelFactory factories;
because this is not supported by
org.apache.wicket.spring.injection.annot.AnnotProxyFieldValueFactory.
I could create another spring bean:
public interface JukeboxConfigPanelFactoryManager {
public ListJukeboxConfigPanelFactory getPanelFactoryList();
}
@Component
public class JukeboxConfigPanelFactoryManagerImpl implements
JukeboxConfigPanelFactoryManager, InitializingBean {
private ListJukeboxConfigPanelFactory factoryList;
@Autowired
public JukeboxConfigPanelFactoryManagerImpl(
ListJukeboxConfigPanelFactory factoryList ) {
this.factoryList = factoryList;
}
@Override
public ListJukeboxConfigPanelFactory getPanelFactoryList() {
return Collections.unmodifiableList( factoryList );
}
@Override
public void afterPropertiesSet() throws Exception {
Collections.sort( factoryList,
new
OrderComparator() );
}
}
so now I am able to get all factory implementations in one place:
ListITab tabs = new ArrayListITab();
for ( JukeboxConfigPanelFactory factory :
panelFactoryManager.getPanelFactoryList() ) {
tabs.add( new
JukeboxConfigPanelFactoryAwareAbstractTab( factory, getJukeboxModel() ) );
}
add( new AjaxTabbedPanel( tabs, tabs ) );
But now the JukeboxConfigPanelFactoryAwareAbstractTab will fail miserably at
serializing as only the manager has been wrapped with a proxy and not the
factories underneath.
How can I approach the problem using current state of wicket-spring module?
I haven't found a way to wrap the factory beans with proxy manually.
--
Leszek Gawron http://lgawron.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DiskPageStore - Error FileNotFoundException
something else, other then wicket, may be eating up your filehandles. just because wicket gets the exception doesnt mean its causing it. ask your admin to list the files that are held open to see what they are. and, yes, also upgrade to latest ver. -igor On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Jeffrey Schneller jeffrey.schnel...@envisa.com wrote: Hi... my site in production has been running and after our latest code change we started to get the error below after a few days. It appears it is something to do with wicket's PageMap. In the past this error would come up after weeks or months of the app running [we were re-starting tomcat fairly regularly back then]. The sys-admin of the box said he increased the open file limit from 1024 to 65535 per the following thread [http://osdir.com/ml/users-wicket.apache.org/2009-09/msg00674.html ]. However this seems like a hack and not solving the underlying problem. In fact we got the exception thrown even quicker after the file limit change was made. We are running wicket 1.4.3 [yes, it is an outdated version and moving to 1.4.16 *may* solve the problem.] Any ideas? What can we be doing wrong? 2011-03-03 15:42:26,681 | [] | ERROR (DiskPageStore.java:930) Error flushing page java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.FileNotFoundException: /usr/share/apache-tomcat-6.0.20/work/Catalina/localhost/_/wicket-spring- hibernate-filestore/7815/9545/64D2A385CF347B9FF9074C8345CA99FB/pm-null (Too many open files) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.pagestore.FileChannelPool.newFileChannel (FileChannelPool.java:103) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.pagestore.FileChannelPool.getFileChannel (FileChannelPool.java:170) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.pagestore.DiskPageStore$SessionEntry.sav ePage(DiskPageStore.java:241) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.pagestore.DiskPageStore.flushPagesToSave List(DiskPageStore.java:924) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.pagestore.DiskPageStore$PageSavingThread .run(DiskPageStore.java:996) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: /usr/share/apache-tomcat-6.0.20/work/Catalina/localhost/_/wicket-spring- hibernate-filestore/7815/9545/64D2A385CF347B9FF9074C8345CA99FB/pm-null (Too many open files) at java.io.RandomAccessFile.open(Native Method) at java.io.RandomAccessFile.init(RandomAccessFile.java:212) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.pagestore.FileChannelPool.newFileChannel (FileChannelPool.java:98) ... 5 more - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Servlet Mapping Expectations
Hi, I am able to get the request related information from both Request and WebRequest. Thanks for that. This i am able to do in the WebPage. My WebApplication getHomePage is called when ever I call /app or /app/, so I have to intercept the request before that. I am trying with mount(String, Package), but that lead to the specific URL only. This is in the init() method of WebApplication. My basic requirement is to serve pages like /app/user1 /app/user2 /app/user2/profile etc. Do i have to create new* methods as described at https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/request-processing-overview.html Do I have to implement IRequestCodingStrategy and attach it to Request Cycle? thanks devush On 05/03/2011, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Hi, On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 4:03 PM, devush devushan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have following settings in web.xml servlet-mapping servlet-namemyserv/servlet-name url-pattern/app/*/url-pattern /servlet-mapping I expect that all requests such as: /app /app/abc /app/xyz should come to the servlet. But only /app currently works. They actually come but since you don't have mounts at /abc or /xyz Wicket decides there is nothing to do for them. /app matches on the App's home page. Moreover, I want to access the getRequestURL part from the servlet API also, so that i can use the information in the application logic. I am able to do this in the normal servlet and then forward the request to the wicket but in that case the URL at the client remains the same and causes problems later in the application. See if Wicket's Request#getPath() (Wicket 1.4.x) or #getUrl() (Wicket 1.5.x) returns what you need. Otherwise you can always use the underlying HttpServletRequest: - 1.4.x - WebRequest#getHttpServletRequest() - 1.5.x - (HttpServletRequest) Request#getContainerRequest() thanks devush - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
