very nice with the scaffold component!!
Any examples of it?
2011/3/31 James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com:
Wicketopia is a Rapid Application Development (RAD) library for
Wicket. There is some documentation available at:
http://wicketopia.sourceforge.net
The official release will be
That seems very cool !!
Many thanks for your great job
Julien Roche
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:02 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
very nice with the scaffold component!!
Any examples of it?
2011/3/31 James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com:
Wicketopia is a
Hi all,
From Wicket 1.5, ReloadingWicketFilter does not work.
It seems a classloader from WicketFilter.getClassLoader()
isn't used on instancing WebApplication (WicketFilter.java:281).
The below code works correctly, but ad-hoc.
public class MyWicketFilter extends ReloadingWicketFilter {
Are you sure ?
See WicketFilter's code and the usage
of org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.getClassLoader()
ReloadingWicketFilter overrides this method so the reloading class loader
should be used in init() and doFilter().
2011/4/1 Hideyuki TAKEUCHI webmas...@chimera.st
Hi all,
From
Without knowing what RAD or Scaffolding is about, the examples on your site
really make very little sense to me.
You show a method, getDescription, with a bunch of annotations on them. You
don't show what this method is a part of, or how that actually ties in with
your actual wicket code
Hi Martin,
Thanks for your reply.
Yes, Please see in WicketFilter.init(boolean, FilterConfig).
public void init(final boolean isServlet,
final FilterConfig filterConfig) throws ServletException {
this.filterConfig = filterConfig;
applicationFactory = getApplicationFactory();
Hi Hideyuki,
I think the idea is that if the Application class is modified then you'll
need to restart the whole web application.
Even if we use the ReloadingClassLoader it will reload the class but it wont
be re-init()-ed, so it will not be clear whether the changes are loaded and
taken into
Am 31.03.2011 17:39, schrieb Loren Cole:
We're using annotations to mount our pages, and would like to set things up
so they use HybridUrlCodingStrategy by default. Does anyone know of a way
to do this?
Thanks,
Loren
Maybe you can write your own mount method mountHybrid and overload it.
Then
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Maarten Billemont lhun...@gmail.com wrote:
Without knowing what RAD or Scaffolding is about, the examples on your site
really make very little sense to me.
The scaffolding term is borrowed from the Rails/Grails folks.
Basically, it automatically generates a
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:02 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
very nice with the scaffold component!!
Any examples of it?
The example application includes an example:
By the way, the example is available for download from here:
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/wicketopia/wicketopia-example/0.9.1/wicketopia-example-0.9.1.war
It should work in any container (crossing fingers), but the classpath
scanning might get messed up in some more strict environments.
I have to agree with Maarten on points; without more documentation,
prospective users will just dismiss this shortly after visitinga
couple of webpages. Some questions:
- Does this offer static scaffolding (e.g. build time) or runtime?
Are templating mechanisms available?
- What are
Awesome. We are already using wicketstuff-annotation, annotating the base
class is the (now obvious) solution we were looking for.
Thanks,
Loren
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Mike Mander wicket-m...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 31.03.2011 17:39, schrieb Loren Cole:
We're using annotations to mount
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Emmanouil Batsis ma...@abiss.gr wrote:
I have to agree with Maarten on points; without more documentation,
prospective users will just dismiss this shortly after visitinga couple of
webpages. Some questions:
I appreciate you guys taking the time to give
Shouldnt a call to detach on a cpm targeting a ldm chain detach so that it
will reload?
yep
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:02 PM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Shouldnt a call to detach on a cpm targeting a ldm chain detach so that it
will reload?
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
This has been discussed before
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1221), but I can't find
the old vote thread to see what folks think. The problem is that a
checkbox is a weird bird when it comes to HTTP. If it's unchecked, it
doesn't send a value which makes Wicket think you haven't
I vote for 2, checkbox needs always to satisfy the required requirement. As
pointed, there are no parameter in the HTTP request reader for false inputs,
we can't distinguish 'false' from 'null', so we can't consider that user
isn't meeting the required condition.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:34 PM,
I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket
framework.
In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks
*Project* *Current Stable Version* Apache Click 2.2.0 Apache
where do i apply for a job there? sounds like fun!
-igor
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jim Pinkham pinkh...@gmail.com wrote:
I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket
framework.
In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks:
Gotta be a aprils fools thing..
Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number?
Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows
95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better
.
2011/4/1 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
where
1. The current approach is correct, requiring a checkbox means
requiring that it be checked.
2. A checkbox shouldn't be able to be required. You can't *not*
provide a value (it's binary) for a checkbox, so therefore it always
should satisfy the required requirement.
(1)
I can't think of
W dniu 01.04.2011 20:14, nino martinez wael pisze:
Gotta be a aprils fools thing..
Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number?
Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows
95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better
in a button this seemed to have a impact on deciding to reloading the :
cancelButton.setDefaultFormProcessing(false);
Not sure why it has, no matter what I detached the cpm and I guess it
should be reloaded.. However it's working as I want now..
have a great weekend, ha en go weekend or
im running win 2000, you guys are too far behind.
-igor
2011/4/1 Rafał Krupiński r.krupin...@gmail.com:
W dniu 01.04.2011 20:14, nino martinez wael pisze:
Gotta be a aprils fools thing..
Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number?
Why not take a look at
hah some of our servers are 2008 r2 :)
However im considering doing a nix distribution called HAL 9000 as
it probably will attract a lot of users based on the high number...
2011/4/1 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
im running win 2000, you guys are too far behind.
-igor
2011/4/1
I would stick with 1 (required to be checked).
The main reason would be not to break compatibility with old versions. I
actually used .setRequired(true) on legal checkboxes (disclaimers) in
one of our applications because if I have a required checkbox I expect
it to be needed to be checked.
On 01/04/2011 19:34, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
that can be accomplished using a validator.
Is that not true of all form components?
Matt
-igor
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Pennington
m...@profounddecisions.co.uk wrote:
1. The current approach is correct, requiring a checkbox means
no, validators do not typically handle null values. those are
controlled by the required flag. the reason checkboxes are unique is
that they have no null value, a null in the checkbox means false
-igor
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Matthew Pennington
m...@profounddecisions.co.uk wrote:
On
Guys,
I'm having an intermittent issue in development where use of a ModalWindow on a
page completely crashes wicket.
I don't know of the ModalWindow is the root cause. I am hoping that someone
with intimate knowledge of wicket's page store can help me narrow it down.
Hints appreciated. =)
looks like your page is referencing session or pagemap somehow
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Russell Morrisey
russell.morri...@missionse.com wrote:
Guys,
I'm having an intermittent issue in development where use of a ModalWindow
on a page completely crashes wicket.
I don't know of the
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Matthew Pennington
m...@profounddecisions.co.uk wrote:
(1)
I can't think of any useful benefit to (2) but I *can* think of a very
useful benefit for (1) The classic tick this box to indicate that you have
read and agreed to sell us your soul EULA would be the
I second Daniel's comments.
+1 for option 1
From: Daniel Neugebauer mailingli...@energiequant.de
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 04/01/2011 02:56 PM
Subject:Re: [VOTE] Behavior of CheckBox With Respect to
setRequired(true)
I would stick with 1 (required to be checked).
On 01 Apr 2011, at 20:56, Daniel Neugebauer wrote:
I would stick with 1 (required to be checked).
The main reason would be not to break compatibility with old versions.
Lame reason. Don't fix bugged behavior because old code relies on it.
All that got us is a renders-well-in-IE 6.0 web,
OMG?!? ARE YOU SERIOUS??? Here we are already using WINDOWS 2000 with
OFFICE 2010 ;)
(Note: never ever believe any mails, blogs, newspapers on april 1st *g*)
Am 01.04.11 20:14, schrieb nino martinez wael:
Gotta be a aprils fools thing..
Who would decide what framework to be used based on
to clarify, this kind of change is off the table for 1.4, but may be
implemented in 1.5
-igor
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Maarten Billemont lhun...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01 Apr 2011, at 20:56, Daniel Neugebauer wrote:
I would stick with 1 (required to be checked).
The main reason would
On 01 Apr 2011, at 20:56, Daniel Neugebauer wrote:
BTW an empty string (that's not null) is a string nevertheless. Following the
argument that an unchecked (false) checkbox should be regarded as valid if it
is required, an empty string should be accepted as a valid input as well.
I don't
I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a number,
and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Vote-New-Wicket-Version-Numbering-tp3420887p3421249.html
Sent from the Users forum
This works like a charm - thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/problems-with-spring-integration-tp3416484p3421269.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[] Please, check this box if you agree with EULA
[ x ] Please, uncheck this box if you don't want to receive notifications
In this case, I would set the first checkbox as required, and leave the
later as optional.
Vote for (1) +1
Best regards,
Bruno Borges
www.brunoborges.com.br
+55 21
Hi all,
is there any chance to change an image once the user choose another
language?
With a text it's very easy because the only thing you have to provide are
the different language property files.
Let's assume there is a dropdown with different languages. I've added
DropDownChoices and
On 02 Apr 2011, at 00:13, Bruno Borges wrote:
[] Please, check this box if you agree with EULA
[ x ] Please, uncheck this box if you don't want to receive notifications
In this case, I would set the first checkbox as required, and leave the
later as optional.
Vote for (1) +1
Do you have a propetymodel with the session as its object?
On Friday, April 1, 2011, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote:
looks like your page is referencing session or pagemap somehow
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Russell Morrisey
russell.morri...@missionse.com wrote:
Guys,
I'm
There is a locale pub example in wicket-examples that shows how to do it.
-igor
On Apr 1, 2011 3:21 PM, hrbaer herber.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
is there any chance to change an image once the user choose another
language?
With a text it's very easy because the only thing you have to
Thanks Igor.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/changing-image-on-locale-change-tp3421291p3421371.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe,
Stuck on a win machine, but checked out my classpath, even deleted my
maven repo .m2/repository/org/apache/wicket to verify what i'm seeing
in my pom but no dice.
I'm using 1.4.16 or wicket-xx including velocity. This code:
// START SNIPPET, next line is 51
VelocityPanel panel = new
Quickstart?
On Apr 1, 2011 7:57 PM, Emmanouil Batsis ma...@abiss.gr wrote:
Stuck on a win machine, but checked out my classpath, even deleted my
maven repo .m2/repository/org/apache/wicket to verify what i'm seeing
in my pom but no dice.
I'm using 1.4.16 or wicket-xx including velocity. This
Quoting James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com:
Quickstart?
Bear with me; are you asking for a minimal testcase based on the
archetype or whether i'm actually using it (or something else)?
Cheers,
Manos
-
To
I agree with Maarten, +1 for the second behaviour (2) and let validators
do the rest.
--
Marek
On 04/01/2011 11:23 PM, Maarten Billemont wrote:
On 01 Apr 2011, at 20:56, Daniel Neugebauer wrote:
I would stick with 1 (required to be checked).
The main reason would be not to break
I poon you all with my Atari 7800!
Ok, so it doesn't have a keyboard, let alone a JVM, but the version
number is so much bigger - it just has to be the best!
-Original Message-
From: msj121 [mailto:msj...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 8:56 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Of course it is the best. It has no software error-prone... :-)
No GC problems, no heap calculations.
=)
Bruno Borges
www.brunoborges.com.br
+55 21 76727099
The glory of great men should always be
measured by the means they have used to
acquire it.
- Francois de La Rochefoucauld
On Fri,
Yippee! My book has arrived.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Wicket-Cookbook-Published-tp3406012p3421473.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
PersistenceProvider is an interface and the implementation class
doesn't depend on Spring at all. It's a pure hibernate DAO,
essentially. The example application is pieced together with Spring,
since that's what I'm familiar with and it allows me to put something
together with little effort by
On 02 Apr 2011, at 00:13, Bruno Borges wrote:
[ ] Please, check this box if you agree with EULA
[ x ] Please, uncheck this box if you don't want to receive notifications
In this case, I would set the first checkbox as required, and leave the
later as optional.
Vote for (1) +1
On Fri,
i want to know whether i can use gwt along with wicket
so i can quite manage both server and client side coding efficiently
are there any tutorials to integrate gwt with wicket
thank you in advance
--
View this message in context:
55 matches
Mail list logo
