Re: ComponentFeedbackPanel with Firefox 3.6.x - repeating error messages

2011-08-11 Thread D'Arcy Smith
Figured it out... the sample I had found at some point used label instead of span Changing it to span seems to have it working in all browsers now. ..darcy -- View this message in context:

rendering component

2011-08-11 Thread Lurtz Nazgul
Hi,  Is it possible not to render a component for security issues.  I know i can use IAuthorizationStrategy for this but i want to to it manually I don't need just setVisible(false), i really need not to render that component.  I don't know which method to override. Below code gives error.

Re: rendering component

2011-08-11 Thread Mike Mander
Am 11.08.2011 11:59, schrieb Lurtz Nazgul: Hi, Is it possible not to render a component for security issues. I know i can use IAuthorizationStrategy for this but i want to to it manually I don't need just setVisible(false), i really need not to render that component. I don't know which

Re: rendering component

2011-08-11 Thread Martin Grigorov
org.apache.wicket.Component.setVisibilityAllowed(boolean) is for that purpose. if component.isVisibleInHierachy() returns false then the component is not rendered. What exactly is the problem with setVisible(false) ? On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Lurtz Nazgul lu...@ymail.com wrote: Hi, Is

Re: rendering component

2011-08-11 Thread Lurtz Nazgul
 setVisible(false) , actually renders component but disables it via style sheet like input type=input value=name style=display:none  I don't want that. I will try isVisibleInHierachy now. Thanks. From: Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org To:

RE: rendering component

2011-08-11 Thread Wilhelmsen Tor Iver
 setVisible(false) , actually renders component but disables it via style sheet Isn't that the case only when you use setOutputPlaceholderTag(true)? For other cases, nothing is output AFAIK. - Tor Iver - To unsubscribe,

Re: rendering component

2011-08-11 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Wilhelmsen Tor Iver toriv...@arrive.no wrote:  setVisible(false) , actually renders component but disables it via style sheet Isn't that the case only when you use setOutputPlaceholderTag(true)? For other cases, nothing is output AFAIK. true - Tor Iver

Re: custom (non wicket) modal dialog. Problem with urls.

2011-08-11 Thread brazz
Problem is solved now: i extract the application-relative-path with: String path = Strings.stripJSessionId(request.getRequestURI()); the trick is to overwrite method onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) of class ResourceLink and prepend the application -relative path so i end up with e.g.:

Re: Wicket 1.5: Question (or feature request) afterOnInitialize()

2011-08-11 Thread armandoxxx
Igor: thank you for your reply and your solution. Could you please discuss this case with other developers and let me know what they think? In my opinion framework should make my job easier not force me to do workarounds to get what I need. Just a thought. Martin: thank you :D Kind regards

Form looses data

2011-08-11 Thread Mike Mander
Hi, i've added a domain model globally to my session. A form for editing this data is provided on page A. On this i have 2 submit buttons. One with setDefaultFormProcessing false (to previous page) and one with true (to next step). If i press the main submit (next step | dfp = true) then

Re: Form looses data

2011-08-11 Thread Bruno Borges
Shouldn't you be submitting that button anyway? dfp = true *Bruno Borges* www.brunoborges.com.br +55 21 76727099 On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Mike Mander wicket-m...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, i've added a domain model globally to my session. A form for editing this data is provided on page

CheckGroup updateModel + setrequired (Bug?)

2011-08-11 Thread delta
When I set the *setRequired(true)* in a CheckGroup and Override the *onValidate* of the Form, calling *updateFormComponentModels();* to update the Models, a NullPointerException occurs in CheckGroup.updateModel. This only occurs when setRequired is setted to true, not happening when not setted or

Re: CheckGroup updateModel + setrequired (Bug?)

2011-08-11 Thread Bruno Borges
Are you calling super.onValidate() ? And I think before updating the models, all components must be visitted. *Bruno Borges* www.brunoborges.com.br +55 21 76727099 On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:39 AM, delta lsgpimen...@gmail.com wrote: When I set the *setRequired(true)* in a CheckGroup and

Re: CheckGroup updateModel + setrequired (Bug?)

2011-08-11 Thread delta
Yeap, I'm calling ;) -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/CheckGroup-updateModel-setrequired-Bug-tp3736032p3736067.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To

Re: Form looses data

2011-08-11 Thread Mike Mander
Am 11.08.2011 16:36, schrieb Bruno Borges: Shouldn't you be submitting that button anyway? dfp = true *Bruno Borges* www.brunoborges.com.br +55 21 76727099 On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Mike Manderwicket-m...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, i've added a domain model globally to my session. A

Re: Component with ListView that adds other Components?

2011-08-11 Thread Bruno Borges
I think that's a case for using Border. http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/border/Border.html You may check the migration of Border behaviour in 1.5 at https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migration-to-wicket-15.html#MigrationtoWicket1.5-RemovedmagicfromBorderComponent

Re: Form looses data

2011-08-11 Thread Bruno Borges
You want to go back to another page without having to fill the form, but you also don't want to lose data you typed in in the previous screen? Seems weird to me. Have you considered to add Ajax update behaviour? onBlur of components, you could update the model of each component. *Bruno Borges*

Re: CheckGroup updateModel + setrequired (Bug?)

2011-08-11 Thread delta
Hmmm, the error only occurs when no CheckBox in the CheckGroup is marked, but considering this scenario the super.onValidate() should complain about I don't have any CheckBox marked in a CheckGroup with serRequired(true), that's not what happening. And since this validation don't exists, when

Re: CheckGroup updateModel + setrequired (Bug?)

2011-08-11 Thread delta
Hmmm, the error only occurs when no CheckBox in the CheckGroup is marked, but considering this scenario the super.onValidate() should complain about I don't have any CheckBox marked in a CheckGroup with serRequired(true), that's not what happening. And since this validation don't exists, when

Re: CheckGroup updateModel + setrequired (Bug?)

2011-08-11 Thread Bruno Borges
Is that Wicket 1.5 RC5.1 ? *Bruno Borges* www.brunoborges.com.br +55 21 76727099 On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:00 PM, delta lsgpimen...@gmail.com wrote: Hmmm, the error only occurs when no CheckBox in the CheckGroup is marked, but considering this scenario the super.onValidate() should

Re: CheckGroup updateModel + setrequired (Bug?)

2011-08-11 Thread delta
It's 1.4.15 -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/CheckGroup-updateModel-setrequired-Bug-tp3736032p3736109.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To

Re: Form looses data

2011-08-11 Thread Mike Mander
Am 11.08.2011 16:54, schrieb Bruno Borges: You want to go back to another page without having to fill the form, but you also don't want to lose data you typed in in the previous screen? Seems weird to me. Have you considered to add Ajax update behaviour? onBlur of components, you could update

Wicket Wizard Question

2011-08-11 Thread Corbin, James
I have a five step static Wicket Wizard which works great for the most part. I am running on Wicket 1.4.13. I am seeing some odd behavior and stepping through a debugger hasn't yielded any causes so I am reaching out to the forum for help. If I navigate through the wizard by pressing the Next

Re: CheckGroup updateModel + setrequired (Bug?)

2011-08-11 Thread Bruno Borges
Could you test your app with 1.4.18 ? Just in case... *Bruno Borges* www.brunoborges.com.br +55 21 76727099 On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:04 PM, delta lsgpimen...@gmail.com wrote: It's 1.4.15 -- View this message in context:

Re: Form looses data

2011-08-11 Thread Bruno Borges
In your GoBack button's submit method (dpf = false), call form.updateFormComponentModels() *Bruno Borges * www.brunoborges.com.br +55 21 76727099 On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Mike Mander wicket-m...@gmx.de wrote: Am 11.08.2011 16:54, schrieb Bruno Borges: You want to go back to

Re: Form looses data

2011-08-11 Thread Martin Makundi
Is possible using reuseManager, but you need to keep reference to it somewhere. http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Check-box-loses-checked-state-after-error-td1855690.html ** Martin 2011/8/11 Bruno Borges bruno.bor...@gmail.com: In your GoBack button's submit method (dpf = false), call

Re: Form looses data

2011-08-11 Thread Bruno Borges
Models must be updated anyway, and that's solved with form.updateFormComponentModels() *Bruno Borges* www.brunoborges.com.br +55 21 76727099 On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: Is possible using reuseManager, but you need to keep

Re: Wicket 1.5: Question (or feature request) afterOnInitialize()

2011-08-11 Thread Igor Vaynberg
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:35 AM, armandoxxx armando@dropchop.com wrote: Igor: thank you for your reply and your solution. Could you please discuss this case with other developers and let me know what they think? this is the place where the developers discuss things. if any of them want to

Re: CheckGroup updateModel + setrequired (Bug?)

2011-08-11 Thread Igor Vaynberg
why are you calling updatemodels() from inside onvalidate()? this is what happens anyways if validation passes. i am guessing your code does not check if the form is valid before calling updatemodels() which causes the error you are describing since you are forcing a model update for a component

Re: Wicket 1.5: Question (or feature request) afterOnInitialize()

2011-08-11 Thread Bruno Borges
Isn't this correct? onInitialize() { super.onInitialize(); ... // whatever I put here would be the same as overriding onAfterInitialize(); } *Bruno Borges* www.brunoborges.com.br +55 21 76727099 On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Aug

Re: Form looses data

2011-08-11 Thread Martin Makundi
No, if you don't want to update models, you can use reusemanager. It retains the raw unsubmitted values in rawInput fields. ** Martin 2011/8/11 Bruno Borges bruno.bor...@gmail.com: Models must be updated anyway, and that's solved with form.updateFormComponentModels() *Bruno Borges*

Re: CheckGroup updateModel + setrequired (Bug?)

2011-08-11 Thread delta
I'm doing that to force the Models to update, since when I receive a validate error, like when I dont fill a required field, the checkgroup in the page loose the ckeckboxes marked, so I update the models and the marked checkboxes come back (So the user dont have to mark all over again just because

Re: CheckGroup updateModel + setrequired (Bug?)

2011-08-11 Thread delta
I can't, we must work with this version, because of the company. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/CheckGroup-updateModel-setrequired-Bug-tp3736032p3736594.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

onInitialize in the page construction/initialization lifecycle

2011-08-11 Thread Chris Colman
I just realized that onInitialize() isn't the 'initialize' of traditional frameworks that I thought it was: The style of initialization that occurs in the lifecycle after instance construction has completed and the call to the constructors has returned. onInitialize appears to be called while

Re: onInitialize in the page construction/initialization lifecycle

2011-08-11 Thread Igor Vaynberg
this is true only for page#oninitialize() which is called at the time the first add(component) is called. it remains like this for backwards compatbility with the first introduction of #oninitialize(). in 1.5 this has been changed so that oninitialize() is called after the page is constructed.

RE: onInitialize in the page construction/initialization lifecycle

2011-08-11 Thread Chris Colman
this is true only for page#oninitialize() which is called at the time the first add(component) is called. it remains like this for backwards compatbility with the first introduction of #oninitialize(). Ahuh! In 1.5 this has been changed so that oninitialize() is called after the page is

Re: CheckGroup updateModel + setrequired (Bug?)

2011-08-11 Thread Clint Checketts
Even if you can't upgrade the production version its worth testing it against the newer version of Wicket to see if the bug is resolved. On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:43 PM, delta lsgpimen...@gmail.com wrote: I can't, we must work with this version, because of the company. -- View this message

[Announce] Wicket Stuff Core 1.4.18 Released

2011-08-11 Thread Michael O'Cleirigh
Hello, Following the release of wicket 1.4.18 I have cut a matching wicketstuff-core release. The artifacts have been promoted and should be synced into the maven central repository with in a 2-3 hours. They can be retrieved like this: dependency groupIdorg.wicketstuff/groupId

Re: [Announce] Wicket Stuff Core 1.4.18 Released

2011-08-11 Thread Bruno Borges
Mike, excelent job!! Thank you very much. *Bruno Borges* www.brunoborges.com.br +55 21 76727099 On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Michael O'Cleirigh michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca wrote: Hello, Following the release of wicket 1.4.18 I have cut a matching wicketstuff-core release. The

Re: Ajax Response xml showing in browser

2011-08-11 Thread Wayne W
Hi Jeremy, did you find a solution as we've had the problem for a long time now and more and more people are reporting it as they move over to FF and Chrome? On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com wrote: Perhaps this thread will help:

Re: Ajax response render as source in the browser

2011-08-11 Thread Wayne W
just to say we still have this issue and its getting more and more worse as people are moving to FF and Chrome. We have no idea how to solve as we cannot reproduce it consistently. On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I thought you might

Mapper based on user-defined URLs

2011-08-11 Thread Bruno Borges
Hi all, I've digged into PackageMapper and CryptoMapper trying to achieve a Mapper based on user defined URLs, but honestly, it is not easy (at least for me). The goal is to provide access to pages in package com.mysite.profile (pages: Guests, Messages, Wall, Home, etc) through a root path

Re: Mapper based on user-defined URLs

2011-08-11 Thread Igor Vaynberg
if you create a quickstart that people can play with you will get a lot more responses... -igor On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Bruno Borges bruno.bor...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all,   I've digged into PackageMapper and CryptoMapper trying to achieve a Mapper based on user defined URLs, but

Re: Wicket 1.5: Question (or feature request) afterOnInitialize()

2011-08-11 Thread armandoxxx
@IGor: I figured it out .. no need for new features. @Bruno: if you cann onAfterInitialize() in onInitialize() you can't be sure all components on the page we're initialized() Regards Armando -- View this message in context: