Just add a behavior that had an on event callback, i know what you suggested
are sort of the same. But the other would be simpler to grasp?
On Aug 18, 2011 5:06 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
how could it possibly be _even_ simpler?
-igor
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:33 AM,
Hello, guys,
I experience a strange problem with trying to provide a custom servlet with the
wicket session.
Here is my web.xml conf:
filter
filter-namewicketFilter/filter-name
filter-classorg.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter/filter-class
init-param
It sounds like you want to re-invent the Link ...
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:16 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Just add a behavior that had an on event callback, i know what you suggested
are sort of the same. But the other would be simpler to grasp?
On Aug 18, 2011
Try with url-mapping: /friends/* both for the session filter and the servlet
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:03 PM, martin.ase...@mail.bg wrote:
Hello, guys,
I experience a strange problem with trying to provide a custom servlet with
the wicket session.
Here is my web.xml conf:
filter
Hi, namesake :)
Already tried that, no result.
Best,
Martin
- Цитат от Martin Grigorov (mgrigo...@apache.org), на
20.08.2011 в 12:09 - Try with url-mapping: /friends/* both for the
session filter and the servlet
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:03 PM, wrote:
Hello, guys,
paste the last few lines of the exception
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:11 PM, martin.ase...@mail.bg wrote:
Hi, namesake :)
Already tried that, no result.
Best,
Martin
- Цитат от Martin Grigorov (mgrigo...@apache.org), на
20.08.2011 в 12:09 - Try with url-mapping:
Here is the exception:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: you can only locate or create sessions in
the context of a request cycle
at org.apache.wicket.Session.findOrCreate(Session.java:209)
at org.apache.wicket.Session.get(Session.java:253)
at
the mapping is OK. we see WicketSessionFilter in the stack
there is the following code in WSF#bindSession():
if (session == null)
{
if (logger.isDebugEnabled())
{
logger.debug(could
For 1.5 I can say that this is definitely true, the code is in
org.apache.wicket.page.PageAccessSynchronizer.adapt(...).new
PageManagerDecorator() {...}.commitRequest()
The related code in 1.4 is in
org.apache.wicket.Session.requestDetached() but I'm not sure what
exactly happens there.
On Sat,
Actually I load a wicket page at root context and obtain a session.
Afterwards I hit a button that posts to the servlet. I think I'm supposed
to have HttpSession at the time.
Best,
Martin
- Цитат от Martin Grigorov (mgrigo...@apache.org), на
20.08.2011 в 12:44 - the mapping is
try with getWebRequest().getHttpServletRequest().getHttpSession(false)
in your page before making the call to the servlet.
It should return non-null.
Additionally turn on DEBUG logging for WSF
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:54 PM, martin.ase...@mail.bg wrote:
Actually I load a wicket page at
Yeah, is 1.4, but it should be behind pagemap lock..
**
Martin
2011/8/20 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
For 1.5 I can say that this is definitely true, the code is in
org.apache.wicket.page.PageAccessSynchronizer.adapt(...).new
PageManagerDecorator() {...}.commitRequest()
The related
yes, really session is null :O
at servlet:
req.getSession() returns null
and wicketsessionfilter in debug mode prints
20-08-2011 13:25:57,753 DEBUG
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.WicketSessionFilter.bindSession:180
- could not set Wicket session: key null not found in
Sorry, my mistake...
Session is not null at servlet. There I have:
session is: org.apache.catalina.session.StandardSessionFacade@412f4b
while the statement in logs from wicketsessionfilter is:
20-08-2011 13:25:57,753 DEBUG
In the page, which calls the servlet afterwards,
getWebRequestCycle().getWebRequest().getHttpServletRequest().getSession(false)
returns null
Do you have any ideas why this occurs?
Thank you,
Martin
- Цитат от Martin Grigorov (mgrigo...@apache.org), на
20.08.2011 в 13:16 -
Hi can someone explain to me why performance of unit testing is faster using
setUp and destory this way.
@Before
public void setup() {
if (this.authenticatedWebApp == null) {
this.authenticatedWebApp = new AuthenticatedTestApplication();
}
if
Call Session.get().bind() before the POST call and it will be fine.
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:57 PM, martin.ase...@mail.bg wrote:
In the page, which calls the servlet afterwards,
getWebRequestCycle().getWebRequest().getHttpServletRequest().getSession(false)
returns null
Do you have any
Thanks a lot for your time, it did the trick :)
Best regards,
Martin
- Цитат от Martin Grigorov (mgrigo...@apache.org), на
20.08.2011 в 14:31 - Call Session.get().bind() before the POST call
and it will be fine.
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:57 PM, wrote:
In the page, which
Hi Shunmuga,
try with this http://web.itu.edu.tr/uyar/wicket-tutorial/wicket-tutorial.pdf
it's a basic Wicket tutorial for beginners.
Hi Per Newgro,
Thanks for your valuable information. I dont
know wicket basics also. If u have any tuorials or tutorial links
means pls
When you reuse the application instance across tests you are also reusing
its caches.
-igor
On Aug 20, 2011 4:03 AM, cablepuff cablep...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi can someone explain to me why performance of unit testing is faster
using
setUp and destory this way.
@Before
public void setup() {
if
Not exactly...
JUnit calls @Before and @After for each test method. That's why...
*Bruno Borges*
(21) 7672-7099
*www.brunoborges.com*
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
When you reuse the application instance across tests you are also reusing
its
Oh... sorry Igor... :-)
*Bruno Borges*
(21) 7672-7099
*www.brunoborges.com*
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Bruno Borges bruno.bor...@gmail.comwrote:
Not exactly...
JUnit calls @Before and @After for each test method. That's why...
*Bruno Borges*
(21) 7672-7099
*www.brunoborges.com*
22 matches
Mail list logo
