Re: Community tools
I had a discussion about this with martin dashorst when we meet this year at a conference. Apparently, he does like the idea of a SO like QA site for wicket. But wicket being an Apache project, there are certain requirement if i recall our discussion correctly. One of the problems is the hosting of such a side. The mailing list, bugtracker, wicki,... are all hosted and maintained by the apache admins. Getting a new tool into there is not easy. One could host a solution outside of apache, but this opens questions about long term support of the infrastructure, privacy issues and so forth. There are a few opensource implementations available: http://gitorious.org/shapado (used by debian at http://ask.debian.net/) http://www.osqa.net/ I do like the SO style (never been a fan of mailing lists), but on the other side registering here is not much of a hassle. My 2 cent Bert On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 07:25, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com wrote: I like the mail. Atleast i can get the answers even on my not so smart phone. Josh. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote: Source management and bugs are also outdated. The version on github is much better. I recently had to get up to speed with github. Not sure what all the fuss is about. The learning curve was about 20x that of Subversion and I'm still not confident about how to do things or whether what I'm doing is the 'right' thing to be doing. Subversion on the other hand is really easy to understand (and most developers already know it) and even though it has 'theoretical' shortcomings compared to a distributed VCS like git in practice I never saw any difference in performance or usage apart from git being a lot 'weirder' ;) My 2 cents, Gaetan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
custom url for specific pages
In our application (portal) we have a modal dialog that we have to use. In this modal dialog we put a page. Because the portal consists of iframes, we have to use relative urls in the modal dialog. For example instead of: ?wicket:interface=:4:border:_body:dialogContainer:contentPanels:infoTextContentPanel:ajaxEnabledContainer:externalLinks:0:externalLink::IResourceListener:: we have to use: */application-uri/servlet-name/* ?wicket:interface=:4:border:_body:dialogContainer:contentPanels:infoTextContentPanel:ajaxEnabledContainer:externalLinks:0:externalLink::IResourceListener:: but only for certain pages. what we've done now is create custom components that prepend the application-uri + the servlet-name to the URL. For example for a link we override onComponentTag() and prepend the strings to the url: url = RequestUtils.getBaseUrl(this) + url; Is there a more generic way to do this? for example let's say: When the Responsepage is of type A then modify the url accordingly. I've had a look at pathForTarget(IRequestTarget requestTarget) of class WebRequestCodingStrategy, but i think the CodingStrategy is only valid for the first time the page is called and not for every request within the page. For this i would have to mount every possible request-url within the page? Any suggestions? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/custom-url-for-specific-pages-tp3881166p3881166.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Forwarding in 1.5 not working like in 1.4
We have a separate filter set up to catch parameter-less domain name requests ( /* ) like: www.myurl.com http://www.myurl.com/ and forward them to a bookmarkable home page like: www.myurl.com/content/home/o/123 The extra o/123 is an organization discriminator name/value pair and is read in by the home page as a parameter. The use of a forward means that the address in the user's browser remains as www.myurl.com http://www.myurl.com/ but the actual page rendered is www.myurl.com/content/home/o/123 The page mount looks like: pageParametersEncoder = new UrlPathPageParametersEncoder(); mount(new MountedMapper(/content/home, HomePage.class, pageParametersEncoder)); The code used for the forward inside our separate redirector filter is: RequestDispatcher rd = req.getRequestDispatcher(/content/home/o/123); rd.forward(req, res); This filter then does not chain to the next filter so that the servlet engine can re-request with the forwarded URL. In 1.4 the wicket filter then services this forward request and renders the page without a problem. In 1.5 this no longer works and I've tried many different ideas to get it working but it just doesn't seem to want to work properly. Somehow wicket attempts to render a page with a url of: www.myurl.com/123 In other words the /content/home/o/ part has been stripped from the forward to URL. Debugging shows that the wicket request does indeed have the full uri: /content/home/o/123 http://www.myurl.com/content/home/o/123 Any ideas what might be causing this? Yours sincerely, Chris Colman Pagebloom Team Leader, Step Ahead Software pagebloom - your business your website growing together Sydney: (+61 2) 9656 1278 Canberra: (+61 2) 6100 2120 Email: chr...@stepahead.com.au mailto://chr...@stepahead.com.au Website: http://www.pagebloom.com blocked::http://www.pagebloom.com/ http://develop.stepaheadsoftware.com blocked::http://develop.stepaheadsoftware.com/
[wicket 1.5] Howto avoid 404 on shared image?
Hi, i use 1.5.1 (in 1.5 examples i couldn't find a matching one) I've packaged my application images to a package (appname.res.img). WicketApplication is located in root package (appname). In the images package there is a class ImageMounter which is loading all images in package and mount them this way ImageMounter.java code String image = ...; // The image name - one of then IS transparency.png WebApplication.get().mountResource(resources/shop/img/.concat(image), new PackageResourceReference(ImageMounter.class, image)); /code But if i try to use one of the images with the Image class like that: MyPanel.java code Image image = new Image(itemSpot, new PackageResourceReference(/resources/shop/img/transparency.png)); /code MyPanel.html code ul li wicket:id=leafleta wicket:id=overImageToDetailsimg wicket:id=itemSpot //a/li /ul /code i get a 404. Here is the stacktrace WARN - ResourceReferenceRegistry - Asked to auto-create a ResourceReference, but ResourceReferenceRegistry.createDefaultResourceReference() return null. [scope: org.apache.wicket.Application; name: resources/shop/img/transparency.png; locale: null; style: null; variation: null] TRACE - error404 - 16e4jys7nta9q1qq82q3q88dut;/wicket/resource/org.apache.wicket.Application/resources/shop/img/transparency.png I would like to know what i'm doing wrong and why? Thanks for helping me Mike - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [wicket 1.5] Howto avoid 404 on shared image?
See http://wicketinaction.com/2011/07/wicket-1-5-mounting-resources/ for inspiration On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Mike Mander wicket-m...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, i use 1.5.1 (in 1.5 examples i couldn't find a matching one) I've packaged my application images to a package (appname.res.img). WicketApplication is located in root package (appname). In the images package there is a class ImageMounter which is loading all images in package and mount them this way ImageMounter.java code String image = ...; // The image name - one of then IS transparency.png WebApplication.get().mountResource(resources/shop/img/.concat(image), new PackageResourceReference(ImageMounter.class, image)); /code But if i try to use one of the images with the Image class like that: MyPanel.java code Image image = new Image(itemSpot, new PackageResourceReference(/resources/shop/img/transparency.png)); /code MyPanel.html code ul li wicket:id=leafleta wicket:id=overImageToDetailsimg wicket:id=itemSpot //a/li /ul /code i get a 404. Here is the stacktrace WARN - ResourceReferenceRegistry - Asked to auto-create a ResourceReference, but ResourceReferenceRegistry.createDefaultResourceReference() return null. [scope: org.apache.wicket.Application; name: resources/shop/img/transparency.png; locale: null; style: null; variation: null] TRACE - error404 - 16e4jys7nta9q1qq82q3q88dut;/wicket/resource/org.apache.wicket.Application/resources/shop/img/transparency.png I would like to know what i'm doing wrong and why? Thanks for helping me Mike - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
DateField with String model
Hi wicket community,I'm trying to use a DateField (org.apache.wicket.extention.yui.calendar.DateField)with a String in the model, is this possible, perhaps can I provide a converter, a smth like this ? Kind Regards, Benoît de Biolley
Re: Community tools
The biggest issue with moving to Stack Overflow is that we deliver our community to an external party which can do anything with the questions, show stupid ads, etc. Have no mistake: stack exchange is a commercial venture. So one criterium is to be able to pull the plug on it whenever it goes sour. While the content of stack overflow is publicly available, it is not licensed with an Apache friendly license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/). This issue was the biggest hurdle SO needs to take to become a viable alternative for the user list at Apache. As for this list not being visible, you can always shop around for list archive providers. Nabble has a nice forum like interface, Mark mail provides awesome search tooling. Martijn On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Bert taser...@gmail.com wrote: I had a discussion about this with martin dashorst when we meet this year at a conference. Apparently, he does like the idea of a SO like QA site for wicket. But wicket being an Apache project, there are certain requirement if i recall our discussion correctly. One of the problems is the hosting of such a side. The mailing list, bugtracker, wicki,... are all hosted and maintained by the apache admins. Getting a new tool into there is not easy. One could host a solution outside of apache, but this opens questions about long term support of the infrastructure, privacy issues and so forth. There are a few opensource implementations available: http://gitorious.org/shapado (used by debian at http://ask.debian.net/) http://www.osqa.net/ I do like the SO style (never been a fan of mailing lists), but on the other side registering here is not much of a hassle. My 2 cent Bert On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 07:25, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com wrote: I like the mail. Atleast i can get the answers even on my not so smart phone. Josh. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote: Source management and bugs are also outdated. The version on github is much better. I recently had to get up to speed with github. Not sure what all the fuss is about. The learning curve was about 20x that of Subversion and I'm still not confident about how to do things or whether what I'm doing is the 'right' thing to be doing. Subversion on the other hand is really easy to understand (and most developers already know it) and even though it has 'theoretical' shortcomings compared to a distributed VCS like git in practice I never saw any difference in performance or usage apart from git being a lot 'weirder' ;) My 2 cents, Gaetan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [wicket 1.5] Howto avoid 404 on shared image?
Thanks Martin, Uuuh. That is heavy-weight for my little uc :-) Instead of using an image i use now code WebComponent image = new WebComponent(itemSpot); image.add(new SrcModifier(Model.String of(/resources/shop/img/transparency.png))); /code My page is still stateless, and 404 is gone. So it seems to solve my problem. But i really would like to understand the whole process :-) Thanks Mike See http://wicketinaction.com/2011/07/wicket-1-5-mounting-resources/ for inspiration On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Mike Manderwicket-m...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, i use 1.5.1 (in 1.5 examples i couldn't find a matching one) I've packaged my application images to a package (appname.res.img). WicketApplication is located in root package (appname). In the images package there is a class ImageMounter which is loading all images in package and mount them this way ImageMounter.java code String image = ...; // The image name - one of then IS transparency.png WebApplication.get().mountResource(resources/shop/img/.concat(image), new PackageResourceReference(ImageMounter.class, image)); /code But if i try to use one of the images with the Image class like that: MyPanel.java code Image image = new Image(itemSpot, new PackageResourceReference(/resources/shop/img/transparency.png)); /code MyPanel.html code ul li wicket:id=leafleta wicket:id=overImageToDetailsimg wicket:id=itemSpot //a/li /ul /code i get a 404. Here is the stacktrace WARN - ResourceReferenceRegistry - Asked to auto-create a ResourceReference, but ResourceReferenceRegistry.createDefaultResourceReference() return null. [scope: org.apache.wicket.Application; name: resources/shop/img/transparency.png; locale: null; style: null; variation: null] TRACE - error404 - 16e4jys7nta9q1qq82q3q88dut;/wicket/resource/org.apache.wicket.Application/resources/shop/img/transparency.png I would like to know what i'm doing wrong and why? Thanks for helping me Mike - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [wicket 1.5] Howto avoid 404 on shared image?
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Mike Mander wicket-m...@gmx.de wrote: Thanks Martin, Uuuh. That is heavy-weight for my little uc :-) I'd say that your approach was heavy-weight. You were going to add a mapper for each image, while my approach adds just one (stateless) mapper that dynamically resolves the images per request. Instead of using an image i use now code WebComponent image = new WebComponent(itemSpot); image.add(new SrcModifier(Model.String of(/resources/shop/img/transparency.png))); /code My page is still stateless, and 404 is gone. So it seems to solve my problem. I'm glad to hear that! But i really would like to understand the whole process :-) Thanks Mike See http://wicketinaction.com/2011/07/wicket-1-5-mounting-resources/ for inspiration On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Mike Manderwicket-m...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, i use 1.5.1 (in 1.5 examples i couldn't find a matching one) I've packaged my application images to a package (appname.res.img). WicketApplication is located in root package (appname). In the images package there is a class ImageMounter which is loading all images in package and mount them this way ImageMounter.java code String image = ...; // The image name - one of then IS transparency.png WebApplication.get().mountResource(resources/shop/img/.concat(image), new PackageResourceReference(ImageMounter.class, image)); /code But if i try to use one of the images with the Image class like that: MyPanel.java code Image image = new Image(itemSpot, new PackageResourceReference(/resources/shop/img/transparency.png)); /code MyPanel.html code ul li wicket:id=leafleta wicket:id=overImageToDetailsimg wicket:id=itemSpot //a/li /ul /code i get a 404. Here is the stacktrace WARN - ResourceReferenceRegistry - Asked to auto-create a ResourceReference, but ResourceReferenceRegistry.createDefaultResourceReference() return null. [scope: org.apache.wicket.Application; name: resources/shop/img/transparency.png; locale: null; style: null; variation: null] TRACE - error404 - 16e4jys7nta9q1qq82q3q88dut;/wicket/resource/org.apache.wicket.Application/resources/shop/img/transparency.png I would like to know what i'm doing wrong and why? Thanks for helping me Mike - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Converter for FileUpload
Hello All, I am porting my Wicket 1.4.18 application to 1.5.1. I am now getting the following exception when I use a org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.upload.FileUploadField to upload a file, when all worked well in 1.4.18: ... 43 more Caused by: org.apache.wicket.util.convert.ConversionException: Could not convert value: [org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.upload.FileUpload@1b3d1e5] to type: org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.upload.FileUpload. Could not find compatible converter. at org.apache.wicket.ConverterLocator$DefaultConverter.convertToObject(ConverterLocator.java:109) ... 63 more Does anyone know of an org.apache.wicket.util.convert.IConverter? for org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.upload.FileUpload, or will I have to roll my own? My development environment is: ∙ Web framework: Apache Wicket 1.5.1 using libraries (I am an Ant user): ∙ wicket-core-1.5.1.jar ∙ wicket-request-1.5.1.jar ∙ wicket-util-1.5.1.jar ∙ Web server environment: Google App Engine ∙ Java: 1.6.0_27; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 20.2-b06 ∙ System: Windows XP version 5.1 running on x86; Cp1252; en_GB (nb) ∙ IDE: NetBeans 7.0.1 (Build 201107282000) ∙ Web browser: Mozilla Firefox 7.0.1 Regards, Ian Marshall -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Converter-for-FileUpload-tp3881522p3881522.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
IllegalArgumentException within WicketURLDecoder
Hi! From time to time we are getting an IllegalArgumentException within WicketURLDecoder (see below). We can't reproduce the error and it seems to not bother the users since we haven't had any reports about errors in the UI or so .. yet it keeps showing up in our logs. Could it be some problem with the CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy we are using? I already did some Google searches but have found nothing so far - I have no idea where to start debugging this problem.. Any ideas? Cheers, Patrick 2011-10-06 01:49:19,916 [http-8080-28] ERROR - RequestCycle - URLDecoder: Illegal hex characters in escape (%) pattern - For input string: �ˠ java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: URLDecoder: Illegal hex characters in escape (%) pattern - For input string: �ˠ at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketURLDecoder.decode(WicketURLDecoder.java:179) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketURLDecoder.decode(WicketURLDecoder.java:90) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy$DecodedUrlRequest.init(CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy.java:443) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy.decode(CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy.java:124) at org.apache.wicket.Request.getRequestParameters(Request.java:183) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1310) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1436) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:545) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:486) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:319) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:298) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:857) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:588) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:489) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Converter for FileUpload
The difference in FileUploadField from 1.4.x to 1.5.x is that now it supports input type=file multiple/ (HTML5 standards) and it works with ListFileUpload instead of just FileUpload. You need to update your getConverter() impl to expect ListFileUpload On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Ian Marshall ianmarshall...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, I am porting my Wicket 1.4.18 application to 1.5.1. I am now getting the following exception when I use a org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.upload.FileUploadField to upload a file, when all worked well in 1.4.18: ... 43 more Caused by: org.apache.wicket.util.convert.ConversionException: Could not convert value: [org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.upload.FileUpload@1b3d1e5] to type: org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.upload.FileUpload. Could not find compatible converter. at org.apache.wicket.ConverterLocator$DefaultConverter.convertToObject(ConverterLocator.java:109) ... 63 more Does anyone know of an org.apache.wicket.util.convert.IConverter? for org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.upload.FileUpload, or will I have to roll my own? My development environment is: ∙ Web framework: Apache Wicket 1.5.1 using libraries (I am an Ant user): ∙ wicket-core-1.5.1.jar ∙ wicket-request-1.5.1.jar ∙ wicket-util-1.5.1.jar ∙ Web server environment: Google App Engine ∙ Java: 1.6.0_27; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 20.2-b06 ∙ System: Windows XP version 5.1 running on x86; Cp1252; en_GB (nb) ∙ IDE: NetBeans 7.0.1 (Build 201107282000) ∙ Web browser: Mozilla Firefox 7.0.1 Regards, Ian Marshall -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Converter-for-FileUpload-tp3881522p3881522.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Community tools
+1, totally agree this is a big plus for me, also I can answer mails on my phone easy.. 2011/10/7 Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com: I like the mail. Atleast i can get the answers even on my not so smart phone. Josh. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote: Source management and bugs are also outdated. The version on github is much better. I recently had to get up to speed with github. Not sure what all the fuss is about. The learning curve was about 20x that of Subversion and I'm still not confident about how to do things or whether what I'm doing is the 'right' thing to be doing. Subversion on the other hand is really easy to understand (and most developers already know it) and even though it has 'theoretical' shortcomings compared to a distributed VCS like git in practice I never saw any difference in performance or usage apart from git being a lot 'weirder' ;) My 2 cents, Gaetan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Community tools
I fully understand the risk of relying on an external and uncontrolled party. The best of breed solution would be to have SO like a Q A for wicket based on an open source implementation like Bert mentionned. For the mailing list, I think the advantage of reading the messages on his phone is less important than the gate of a partially closed system that requires a subscription by email. See on http://softwareandsilicon.com/chapter:2 # toc2 - Freedom of Access and - Weak Group Identity Markmail: The traffic is constantly increasing from 1999 until late 2009 early 2010 before being reduced significantly. I think the reason is due to the tool a little bit old. Even if the interface allows to search for messages, ergonomics and the quality of responses is not equivalent to what is available on intenet today. My point is not to criticize but to point out that this is negative for the adoption of wicket. Today when I choose a technology for a project, even though I prefer Wicket for its design, I have to sell the framework to a team that does not necessarily find it very sexy. Gaetan 2011/10/7 Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com The biggest issue with moving to Stack Overflow is that we deliver our community to an external party which can do anything with the questions, show stupid ads, etc. Have no mistake: stack exchange is a commercial venture. So one criterium is to be able to pull the plug on it whenever it goes sour. While the content of stack overflow is publicly available, it is not licensed with an Apache friendly license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/). This issue was the biggest hurdle SO needs to take to become a viable alternative for the user list at Apache. As for this list not being visible, you can always shop around for list archive providers. Nabble has a nice forum like interface, Mark mail provides awesome search tooling. Martijn On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Bert taser...@gmail.com wrote: I had a discussion about this with martin dashorst when we meet this year at a conference. Apparently, he does like the idea of a SO like QA site for wicket. But wicket being an Apache project, there are certain requirement if i recall our discussion correctly. One of the problems is the hosting of such a side. The mailing list, bugtracker, wicki,... are all hosted and maintained by the apache admins. Getting a new tool into there is not easy. One could host a solution outside of apache, but this opens questions about long term support of the infrastructure, privacy issues and so forth. There are a few opensource implementations available: http://gitorious.org/shapado (used by debian at http://ask.debian.net/) http://www.osqa.net/ I do like the SO style (never been a fan of mailing lists), but on the other side registering here is not much of a hassle. My 2 cent Bert On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 07:25, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com wrote: I like the mail. Atleast i can get the answers even on my not so smart phone. Josh. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote: Source management and bugs are also outdated. The version on github is much better. I recently had to get up to speed with github. Not sure what all the fuss is about. The learning curve was about 20x that of Subversion and I'm still not confident about how to do things or whether what I'm doing is the 'right' thing to be doing. Subversion on the other hand is really easy to understand (and most developers already know it) and even though it has 'theoretical' shortcomings compared to a distributed VCS like git in practice I never saw any difference in performance or usage apart from git being a lot 'weirder' ;) My 2 cents, Gaetan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Community tools
On a light note: we can build our version of stackoverflow as a Q/A for wicket. We can build it in wicket and let everyone access the code. We can use it as a demo wicket application. Josh. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Gaetan Zoritchak g.zoritc...@moncoachfinance.com wrote: I fully understand the risk of relying on an external and uncontrolled party. The best of breed solution would be to have SO like a Q A for wicket based on an open source implementation like Bert mentionned. For the mailing list, I think the advantage of reading the messages on his phone is less important than the gate of a partially closed system that requires a subscription by email. See on http://softwareandsilicon.com/chapter:2 # toc2 - Freedom of Access and - Weak Group Identity Markmail: The traffic is constantly increasing from 1999 until late 2009 early 2010 before being reduced significantly. I think the reason is due to the tool a little bit old. Even if the interface allows to search for messages, ergonomics and the quality of responses is not equivalent to what is available on intenet today. My point is not to criticize but to point out that this is negative for the adoption of wicket. Today when I choose a technology for a project, even though I prefer Wicket for its design, I have to sell the framework to a team that does not necessarily find it very sexy. Gaetan 2011/10/7 Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com The biggest issue with moving to Stack Overflow is that we deliver our community to an external party which can do anything with the questions, show stupid ads, etc. Have no mistake: stack exchange is a commercial venture. So one criterium is to be able to pull the plug on it whenever it goes sour. While the content of stack overflow is publicly available, it is not licensed with an Apache friendly license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/). This issue was the biggest hurdle SO needs to take to become a viable alternative for the user list at Apache. As for this list not being visible, you can always shop around for list archive providers. Nabble has a nice forum like interface, Mark mail provides awesome search tooling. Martijn On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Bert taser...@gmail.com wrote: I had a discussion about this with martin dashorst when we meet this year at a conference. Apparently, he does like the idea of a SO like QA site for wicket. But wicket being an Apache project, there are certain requirement if i recall our discussion correctly. One of the problems is the hosting of such a side. The mailing list, bugtracker, wicki,... are all hosted and maintained by the apache admins. Getting a new tool into there is not easy. One could host a solution outside of apache, but this opens questions about long term support of the infrastructure, privacy issues and so forth. There are a few opensource implementations available: http://gitorious.org/shapado (used by debian at http://ask.debian.net/ ) http://www.osqa.net/ I do like the SO style (never been a fan of mailing lists), but on the other side registering here is not much of a hassle. My 2 cent Bert On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 07:25, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com wrote: I like the mail. Atleast i can get the answers even on my not so smart phone. Josh. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote: Source management and bugs are also outdated. The version on github is much better. I recently had to get up to speed with github. Not sure what all the fuss is about. The learning curve was about 20x that of Subversion and I'm still not confident about how to do things or whether what I'm doing is the 'right' thing to be doing. Subversion on the other hand is really easy to understand (and most developers already know it) and even though it has 'theoretical' shortcomings compared to a distributed VCS like git in practice I never saw any difference in performance or usage apart from git being a lot 'weirder' ;) My 2 cents, Gaetan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
1.5.1
Hi
I get an parse exception on the markup below I did'nt get this in
1.5.0 and backwards and I can't seem to find an missing close tag :
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=da lang=da
xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.4-strict.dtd;
head
wicket:head
titleCC Admin åbningstider - wicket:container
wicket:id=entranceNameHeader/wicket:container /title
style
.nameHeader{
margin-left: 1em;
}
/style
/wicket:head
/head
body
wicket:extend
wicket:container wicket:id=linksOrNoLinks/wicket:container
wicket:fragment wicket:id=fragmentNoLinks/wicket:fragment
wicket:fragment wicket:id=fragmentLinks
wicket:link
div class=templateTopMenuRow grid_12
ul class=nav main
li a class=menuItem
href=ViewEntrancePage.htmlÅbningstider/a/li
li a class=menuItem
href=InfoMessagePage.htmlInfobesked/a/li
wicket:container
wicket:id=fragmentContainer
li a class=menuItem
href=CustomParametersPage.htmlParametre/a/li
li a class=menuItem
href=SkillGroupsPage.htmlSkillgrupper/a/li
/wicket:container
/ul
/div
/wicket:link
/wicket:fragment
h1 wicket:id=triggertypelabel
class=nameHeaderKundeindgang/h1
h2 wicket:id=header2Label class=nameHeaderCcadmin
header/h2
wicket:child/
/wicket:extend
/body
/html
Heres the exception:
Caused by: java.text.ParseException: No matching close bracket at
(line 33, column 50)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.XmlPullParser.next(XmlPullParser.java:216)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.filter.RootMarkupFilter.nextElement(RootMarkupFilter.java:58)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.filter.OpenCloseTagExpander.nextElement(OpenCloseTagExpander.java:78)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.AbstractMarkupParser.getNextTag(AbstractMarkupParser.java:213)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.AbstractMarkupParser.parseMarkup(AbstractMarkupParser.java:228)
... 60 more
-Nino
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ajax form submit, loading gif and swap panels
Any comment or documentation to learn how to call jquery function inside of this methot? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/ajax-form-submit-loading-gif-and-swap-panels-tp3876326p3881810.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 1.5.1
wicket:extend
Maybe a problem in the parent markup?
Sven
On 10/07/2011 01:14 PM, nino martinez wael wrote:
Hi
I get an parse exception on the markup below I did'nt get this in
1.5.0 and backwards and I can't seem to find an missing close tag :
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=da lang=da
xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.4-strict.dtd;
head
wicket:head
titleCC Admin åbningstider - wicket:container
wicket:id=entranceNameHeader/wicket:container /title
style
.nameHeader{
margin-left: 1em;
}
/style
/wicket:head
/head
body
wicket:extend
wicket:container wicket:id=linksOrNoLinks/wicket:container
wicket:fragment wicket:id=fragmentNoLinks/wicket:fragment
wicket:fragment wicket:id=fragmentLinks
wicket:link
div class=templateTopMenuRow grid_12
ul class=nav main
li a class=menuItem
href=ViewEntrancePage.htmlÅbningstider/a/li
li a class=menuItem
href=InfoMessagePage.htmlInfobesked/a/li
wicket:container
wicket:id=fragmentContainer
li a class=menuItem
href=CustomParametersPage.htmlParametre/a/li
li a class=menuItem
href=SkillGroupsPage.htmlSkillgrupper/a/li
/wicket:container
/ul
/div
/wicket:link
/wicket:fragment
h1 wicket:id=triggertypelabel
class=nameHeaderKundeindgang/h1
h2 wicket:id=header2Label class=nameHeaderCcadmin
header/h2
wicket:child/
/wicket:extend
/body
/html
Heres the exception:
Caused by: java.text.ParseException: No matching close bracket at
(line 33, column 50)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.XmlPullParser.next(XmlPullParser.java:216)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.filter.RootMarkupFilter.nextElement(RootMarkupFilter.java:58)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.filter.OpenCloseTagExpander.nextElement(OpenCloseTagExpander.java:78)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.AbstractMarkupParser.getNextTag(AbstractMarkupParser.java:213)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.AbstractMarkupParser.parseMarkup(AbstractMarkupParser.java:228)
... 60 more
-Nino
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 1.5.1
the parent renders fine in other contexts.. And im also wondering why
it fails in 1.5.1 but not 1.5.0
2011/10/7 Sven Meier s...@meiers.net:
wicket:extend
Maybe a problem in the parent markup?
Sven
On 10/07/2011 01:14 PM, nino martinez wael wrote:
Hi
I get an parse exception on the markup below I did'nt get this in
1.5.0 and backwards and I can't seem to find an missing close tag :
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=da lang=da
xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.4-strict.dtd;
head
wicket:head
titleCC Admin åbningstider - wicket:container
wicket:id=entranceNameHeader/wicket:container /title
style
.nameHeader{
margin-left: 1em;
}
/style
/wicket:head
/head
body
wicket:extend
wicket:container
wicket:id=linksOrNoLinks/wicket:container
wicket:fragment wicket:id=fragmentNoLinks/wicket:fragment
wicket:fragment wicket:id=fragmentLinks
wicket:link
div class=templateTopMenuRow grid_12
ul class=nav main
li a class=menuItem
href=ViewEntrancePage.htmlÅbningstider/a/li
li a class=menuItem
href=InfoMessagePage.htmlInfobesked/a/li
wicket:container
wicket:id=fragmentContainer
li a class=menuItem
href=CustomParametersPage.htmlParametre/a/li
li a class=menuItem
href=SkillGroupsPage.htmlSkillgrupper/a/li
/wicket:container
/ul
/div
/wicket:link
/wicket:fragment
h1 wicket:id=triggertypelabel
class=nameHeaderKundeindgang/h1
h2 wicket:id=header2Label
class=nameHeaderCcadmin header/h2
wicket:child/
/wicket:extend
/body
/html
Heres the exception:
Caused by: java.text.ParseException: No matching close bracket at
(line 33, column 50)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.XmlPullParser.next(XmlPullParser.java:216)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.filter.RootMarkupFilter.nextElement(RootMarkupFilter.java:58)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.filter.OpenCloseTagExpander.nextElement(OpenCloseTagExpander.java:78)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.AbstractMarkupFilter.nextElement(AbstractMarkupFilter.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.AbstractMarkupParser.getNextTag(AbstractMarkupParser.java:213)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.AbstractMarkupParser.parseMarkup(AbstractMarkupParser.java:228)
... 60 more
-Nino
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 1.5.1
Hi Seems to be right here: wicket:container wicket:id=entranceNameHeader.. You're missing an opening quote Matt smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: ajax form submit, loading gif and swap panels
may you try assembling wiquery to your web-app (http://code.google.com/p/wiquery/). it makes jquery integration trivial in wicket.. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, wholalotta ardaas...@gmail.com wrote: Any comment or documentation to learn how to call jquery function inside of this methot? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/ajax-form-submit-loading-gif-and-swap-panels-tp3876326p3881810.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Community tools
it sounds great, but why not fully concentrate on wicket. apache will adopt whatever magic-solution asa it'll be licence compliant, and affordable by resources and directives. for the moment this mailing list has been a very successful machine, and still has much to bring. outside, whatever wrapper (wicket-based or not, may be assembled to pull all posts, order and make them as far confortable-searcheable as low-patience eager-brains demand). as other expressed: markmail and nabble are pretty enough, and managing issues by mail - on smart or not phones - is simply a pleasure. . On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com wrote: On a light note: we can build our version of stackoverflow as a Q/A for wicket. We can build it in wicket and let everyone access the code. We can use it as a demo wicket application. Josh. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Gaetan Zoritchak g.zoritc...@moncoachfinance.com wrote: I fully understand the risk of relying on an external and uncontrolled party. The best of breed solution would be to have SO like a Q A for wicket based on an open source implementation like Bert mentionned. For the mailing list, I think the advantage of reading the messages on his phone is less important than the gate of a partially closed system that requires a subscription by email. See on http://softwareandsilicon.com/chapter:2 # toc2 - Freedom of Access and - Weak Group Identity Markmail: The traffic is constantly increasing from 1999 until late 2009 early 2010 before being reduced significantly. I think the reason is due to the tool a little bit old. Even if the interface allows to search for messages, ergonomics and the quality of responses is not equivalent to what is available on intenet today. My point is not to criticize but to point out that this is negative for the adoption of wicket. Today when I choose a technology for a project, even though I prefer Wicket for its design, I have to sell the framework to a team that does not necessarily find it very sexy. Gaetan 2011/10/7 Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com The biggest issue with moving to Stack Overflow is that we deliver our community to an external party which can do anything with the questions, show stupid ads, etc. Have no mistake: stack exchange is a commercial venture. So one criterium is to be able to pull the plug on it whenever it goes sour. While the content of stack overflow is publicly available, it is not licensed with an Apache friendly license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/). This issue was the biggest hurdle SO needs to take to become a viable alternative for the user list at Apache. As for this list not being visible, you can always shop around for list archive providers. Nabble has a nice forum like interface, Mark mail provides awesome search tooling. Martijn On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Bert taser...@gmail.com wrote: I had a discussion about this with martin dashorst when we meet this year at a conference. Apparently, he does like the idea of a SO like QA site for wicket. But wicket being an Apache project, there are certain requirement if i recall our discussion correctly. One of the problems is the hosting of such a side. The mailing list, bugtracker, wicki,... are all hosted and maintained by the apache admins. Getting a new tool into there is not easy. One could host a solution outside of apache, but this opens questions about long term support of the infrastructure, privacy issues and so forth. There are a few opensource implementations available: http://gitorious.org/shapado (used by debian at http://ask.debian.net/ ) http://www.osqa.net/ I do like the SO style (never been a fan of mailing lists), but on the other side registering here is not much of a hassle. My 2 cent Bert On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 07:25, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com wrote: I like the mail. Atleast i can get the answers even on my not so smart phone. Josh. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote: Source management and bugs are also outdated. The version on github is much better. I recently had to get up to speed with github. Not sure what all the fuss is about. The learning curve was about 20x that of Subversion and I'm still not confident about how to do things or whether what I'm doing is the 'right' thing to be doing. Subversion on the other hand is really easy to understand (and most developers already know it) and even though it has 'theoretical' shortcomings compared to a distributed VCS like git in practice I never saw any difference in performance or usage apart from git being a lot 'weirder' ;) My 2 cents, Gaetan - To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Re: 1.5.1
virtual ipod on its way to matt.. Dead on! thanks :) 2011/10/7 Matthias Keller matthias.kel...@ergon.ch: Hi Seems to be right here: wicket:container wicket:id=entranceNameHeader.. You're missing an opening quote Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
1.5.1 DropDownChoice howto change default text, not working
I cant get the below to work in 1.5.1 (only version I've tried it in
for a long time)
http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net/msg10790.html
my code:
DropDownChoiceEntrance ddEntrance = new
DropDownChoiceEntrance(
idEntranceOrIvrMenu, entranceModel,
backendDaoService.getCustomerEntranceList(),
new DropDownRendererEntrance()) {
@Override
protected CharSequence getDefaultChoice(String
arg0) {
return new
ResourceModel(chooseone.customerentrance)
.getObject();
}
};
property file:
chooseone.ivr=Vælg IVR Menu
chooseone.customerentrance=Vælg Kundeindgang
chooseone.shadowentrance=Vælg Skyggeindgang
Screen shots:
top one are where I override (theres actually no default text just the
first option) , bottom one where i don't.
http://imgur.com/a/SJwOt
-regards Nino
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 1.5.1
Hi nino, XmlPullParser has became more strict in Wicket 1.5.1 in order to solve WICKET-3773. Now it complains about not balanced quotes of tag attributes. Maybe we could improve exception message. virtual ipod on its way to matt.. Dead on! thanks :) 2011/10/7 Matthias Kellermatthias.kel...@ergon.ch: Hi Seems to be right here: wicket:container wicket:id=entranceNameHeader.. You're missing an opening quote Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 1.5.1
yup that would be really nice. 2011/10/7 Andrea Del Bene adelb...@ciseonweb.it: Hi nino, XmlPullParser has became more strict in Wicket 1.5.1 in order to solve WICKET-3773. Now it complains about not balanced quotes of tag attributes. Maybe we could improve exception message. virtual ipod on its way to matt.. Dead on! thanks :) 2011/10/7 Matthias Kellermatthias.kel...@ergon.ch: Hi Seems to be right here: wicket:container wicket:id=entranceNameHeader.. You're missing an opening quote Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: CouldNotLockPageException using localized RequestMapper URLs
Thanks - I did that, and found the culprit was a file upload (that part was
okay) which fed into an piece of image resizing code:
Graphics2D graphics2D = rescaledImage.createGraphics();
which the stack trace showed was waiting forever on some other AWT init
thread.
So I just kicked it to the curb and used another image scaling library from
http://code.google.com/p/java-image-scaling/ and the problem has gone
away! So not wicket related at all.
In retrospect, I can't think of a more informative way the framework could
have helped me discover this - my breakthru came from the old
tried-and-true method of finding a way to reproduce the issue (of course
that is the hard part - seems like it took forever, trying to explore all
the functions in my system) and then when it finally happened, doing a
thread dump.
Anyway, situation resolved! Back to happy wicket coding...
-- Jim
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi,
Page ids are session relative. I.e. different users may have the same
page id. The actual key is (sessionId, pageId).
Better dump the stacktraces and see why the thread that acquired the
lock needs more than a minute for it to do its job.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Jim Pinkham pinkh...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I'm doing something out of the ordinary - I have several
independant
'clients' using their own versions of my site, and it's been working OK
till
recent increase in my site's use by several clients at once using the
'same'
pages.
I have a ClientFirstRootRequestMapper extends AbstractComponentMapper
that
pulls the client prefix from my URL and then chains the call to
super.mapRequest() with the prefix removed from the url - this has been
working fine since early 1.5.
But now I have these lockups in production recently. My theory is that
they
are somehow sharing ids in the page map(s) such that locking behavior is
not
correct. I'm working on a quickstart, but I thought I'd first throw out
some details and see if anyone has a better theory? Obviously, this is
a
pretty major issue for me, since it brings my whole site down, with a
bunch
of http-80-xx threads showing entries like this:
WARN - PageAccessSynchronizer - http-80-65 failed to acquire lock to
page 7, attempted for 1 minute out of allowed 1 minute
ERROR - PageAccessSynchronizer - failed to acquire lockheld by
http-80-70. Would have thrown:
org.apache.wicket.page.CouldNotLockPageException: Could not lock page 7.
Attempt lasted 1 minute
at
org.apache.wicket.page.PageAccessSynchronizer.lockPage(PageAccessSynchronizer.java:155)
at
org.apache.wicket.page.PageAccessSynchronizer$2.touchPage(PageAccessSynchronizer.java:214)
...
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:859)
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:588)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:489)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
Oct 3, 2011 5:57:55 PM org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint
createWorkerThread
INFO: Maximum number of threads (200) created for connector with address
null and port 80
INFO - AuctionApplication - Bye
I already tried this attempted fix to bypass throwing this exception and
just let it get the lock anyway (I'm desparate here).
String info= held by: ;
IteratorPageLock locks =
this.locks.get().values().iterator();
while (locks.hasNext()) {
PageLock culprit = locks.next();
info += culprit.getThread().getName() + , ;
}
if (info.endsWith(, ))
info = info.substring(0, info.length()-2);
logger.error(failed to acquire lock+info+. Would have
thrown:
,
/*throw*/ new CouldNotLockPageException(pageId,
thread.getName(), timeout));
In my app, I have mounted a CatalogPage like this:
getRootRequestMapperAsCompound().add(new MountedMapper(/catalog,
CatalogPage.class, e));
Running this locally with debug turned on for PageAccessSynchronizer, I
open
two windows and load this page with different prefixes - it appears they
use
the same page id 0 (which might be OK but I'm suspicious..?)
loading http://localhost:8080/clientOne/catalog
13532 [qtp10217370-20] DEBUG - PageAccessSynchronizer -
'qtp10217370-20'
attempting to acquire lock to page with id '0'
13532 [qtp10217370-20] DEBUG - PageAccessSynchronizer -
qtp10217370-20
acquired lock to page 0
13532 [qtp10217370-15] DEBUG - PageAccessSynchronizer -
'qtp10217370-15'
attempting to acquire lock to page with id '0'
13532 [qtp10217370-15] DEBUG - PageAccessSynchronizer -
qtp10217370-15
acquired lock to page 0
13532 [qtp10217370-18] DEBUG - PageAccessSynchronizer -
RE: 1.5.1
Yes, that would be very nice to have an improved exception message. I ran into this problem as well during a migration to 1.5.1 and it caused lots of wasted time trying to find the problem. On a side note 1.5.1 is awesome. The migration was relatively painless. -Original Message- From: nino martinez wael [mailto:nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 9:02 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: 1.5.1 yup that would be really nice. 2011/10/7 Andrea Del Bene adelb...@ciseonweb.it: Hi nino, XmlPullParser has became more strict in Wicket 1.5.1 in order to solve WICKET-3773. Now it complains about not balanced quotes of tag attributes. Maybe we could improve exception message. virtual ipod on its way to matt.. Dead on! thanks :) 2011/10/7 Matthias Kellermatthias.kel...@ergon.ch: Hi Seems to be right here: wicket:container wicket:id=entranceNameHeader.. You're missing an opening quote Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Community tools
So what is the best way (official? permanent?) to link to a previous response? In 6 months when someone has a similar question, what is the official way to link to previous answers? Equally, what is the best way to improve those answers if the answer 6 months back worked at that time, but now is invalid and a 'bad practice' due to wicket improvements? Folks so rarely use the mailing list archives ( http://wicket.apache.org/help/email.html), (not easily searched!) I doubt that is the solution. -Clint On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:32 AM, manuelbarzi manuelba...@gmail.com wrote: it sounds great, but why not fully concentrate on wicket. apache will adopt whatever magic-solution asa it'll be licence compliant, and affordable by resources and directives. for the moment this mailing list has been a very successful machine, and still has much to bring. outside, whatever wrapper (wicket-based or not, may be assembled to pull all posts, order and make them as far confortable-searcheable as low-patience eager-brains demand). as other expressed: markmail and nabble are pretty enough, and managing issues by mail - on smart or not phones - is simply a pleasure. . On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com wrote: On a light note: we can build our version of stackoverflow as a Q/A for wicket. We can build it in wicket and let everyone access the code. We can use it as a demo wicket application. Josh. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Gaetan Zoritchak g.zoritc...@moncoachfinance.com wrote: I fully understand the risk of relying on an external and uncontrolled party. The best of breed solution would be to have SO like a Q A for wicket based on an open source implementation like Bert mentionned. For the mailing list, I think the advantage of reading the messages on his phone is less important than the gate of a partially closed system that requires a subscription by email. See on http://softwareandsilicon.com/chapter:2 # toc2 - Freedom of Access and - Weak Group Identity Markmail: The traffic is constantly increasing from 1999 until late 2009 early 2010 before being reduced significantly. I think the reason is due to the tool a little bit old. Even if the interface allows to search for messages, ergonomics and the quality of responses is not equivalent to what is available on intenet today. My point is not to criticize but to point out that this is negative for the adoption of wicket. Today when I choose a technology for a project, even though I prefer Wicket for its design, I have to sell the framework to a team that does not necessarily find it very sexy. Gaetan 2011/10/7 Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com The biggest issue with moving to Stack Overflow is that we deliver our community to an external party which can do anything with the questions, show stupid ads, etc. Have no mistake: stack exchange is a commercial venture. So one criterium is to be able to pull the plug on it whenever it goes sour. While the content of stack overflow is publicly available, it is not licensed with an Apache friendly license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/). This issue was the biggest hurdle SO needs to take to become a viable alternative for the user list at Apache. As for this list not being visible, you can always shop around for list archive providers. Nabble has a nice forum like interface, Mark mail provides awesome search tooling. Martijn On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Bert taser...@gmail.com wrote: I had a discussion about this with martin dashorst when we meet this year at a conference. Apparently, he does like the idea of a SO like QA site for wicket. But wicket being an Apache project, there are certain requirement if i recall our discussion correctly. One of the problems is the hosting of such a side. The mailing list, bugtracker, wicki,... are all hosted and maintained by the apache admins. Getting a new tool into there is not easy. One could host a solution outside of apache, but this opens questions about long term support of the infrastructure, privacy issues and so forth. There are a few opensource implementations available: http://gitorious.org/shapado (used by debian at http://ask.debian.net/ ) http://www.osqa.net/ I do like the SO style (never been a fan of mailing lists), but on the other side registering here is not much of a hassle. My 2 cent Bert On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 07:25, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com wrote: I like the mail. Atleast i can get the answers even on my not so smart phone. Josh. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote: Source management and bugs are also outdated. The version on github is much better. I
RE: Community tools
So what is the best way (official? permanent?) to link to a previous response? Link to a posting on Nabble or one of the other mailinglist-aggregators out there perhaps? :) - Tor Iver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Community tools
So what is the best way (official? permanent?) to link to a previous response? Link to a posting on Nabble or one of the other mailinglist-aggregators out there perhaps? :) and keep patience while somentity is re-implementing stacko, making it os, waiting it's fully established and tested, convincing apache to adopt it, and finally saying aleluya. here some good intentions on the network, may worth attending on flowing time: http://www.webappers.com/2010/02/26/stack-overflow-like-open-source-qa-systems-for-download/ http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/30269/is-there-any-open-source-code-we-can-get-similar-to-stackoverflow http://code.google.com/p/stacked/ http://code.google.com/p/cnprog/ http://www.osqa.net/ (this one seems to convince... a bit?) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Remove Sort on SortableDataProvider
Thanks! provider.setSort(null); worked! I had tried: provider.setSort(null, true); which caused a null pointer later on. -Original Message- From: Bertrand Guay-Paquet [mailto:ber...@step.polymtl.ca] Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 8:52 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Remove Sort on SortableDataProvider Have you tried: provider.setSort(null); ? If you don't provide a sort property to your provider, that's what it starts with. On 06/10/2011 6:16 PM, Jensen, Bob wrote: I have a SortableDataProvider and have set a sort on it. It sorts fine. Now, I would like to remove the sort so no sorting occurs. Is there a way to remove the sort? Thanks in advance - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Wicket TinyMCE 1.4.18 fails
with the message in JS console: /app/resources/wicket.contrib.tinymce.InPlaceEditBehavior/tiny_mce/themes/advanced/editor_template_src.js:128 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'push' of undefined and it didn't so for 1.4.17. Could anybody confirm this? lg -- Leszek Gawronhttp://lgawron.posterous.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Converter for FileUpload
Fantastic, Martin! I have changed the model for my FileUploadField from FileUpload to ListFileUpload and all works fine, without me having to roll my own converter. (I didn't spot that the constructor for FieldUploadField which takes a model now takes a model of type IModellt;Listlt;FileUploadgt;.) Thanks very much, and have a good weekend, Ian Martin Grigorov-4 wrote: The difference in FileUploadField from 1.4.x to 1.5.x is that now it supports input type=file multiple/ (HTML5 standards) and it works with ListFileUpload instead of just FileUpload. You need to update your getConverter() impl to expect ListFileUpload On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Ian Marshall lt;IanMarshall.UK@gt; wrote: Hello All, I am porting my Wicket 1.4.18 application to 1.5.1. I am now getting the following exception when I use a org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.upload.FileUploadField to upload a file, when all worked well in 1.4.18: ... 43 more Caused by: org.apache.wicket.util.convert.ConversionException: Could not convert value: [org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.upload.FileUpload@1b3d1e5] to type: org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.upload.FileUpload. Could not find compatible converter. at org.apache.wicket.ConverterLocator$DefaultConverter.convertToObject(ConverterLocator.java:109) ... 63 more Does anyone know of an org.apache.wicket.util.convert.IConverter? for org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.upload.FileUpload, or will I have to roll my own? My development environment is: ∙ Web framework: Apache Wicket 1.5.1 using libraries (I am an Ant user): ∙ wicket-core-1.5.1.jar ∙ wicket-request-1.5.1.jar ∙ wicket-util-1.5.1.jar ∙ Web server environment: Google App Engine ∙ Java: 1.6.0_27; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 20.2-b06 ∙ System: Windows XP version 5.1 running on x86; Cp1252; en_GB (nb) ∙ IDE: NetBeans 7.0.1 (Build 201107282000) ∙ Web browser: Mozilla Firefox 7.0.1 Regards, Ian Marshall -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Converter-for-FileUpload-tp3881522p3881522.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@.apache For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@.apache -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@.apache For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@.apache -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Converter-for-FileUpload-tp3881522p3882908.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Wicket ExtJS
So my project has used Wicket (albeit perhaps not well) on it's last couple projects. We are now adopting ExtJS. If I use a page transition style (reloading the browser page in it's entirely each time), I can populate the onReady() in each load, and I only have on Wicket stateful page on the backend to cooperate with. But some folks have expressed interest in using an Ext tab control to maintain multiple pages at once and service each independently. So I could load page A, do some work on it, maybe get interrupted by a coworker asking for something else, open page B, do some work, and never lose my uncommitted work in A as I worked with B and submitted it. The problem here (and i admit that I am a neophyte in both Ext and Wicket, knowing just enough in each to get by) is that as I understand it, Wicket stores the state of the current page on the server. So as soon as I loaded B, A became invalid and submitting A, or issuing AJAX calls from A would look like a new page arrival to it. Am I wrong? Is there a way around this? How can I make Ext and Wicket friends because I really am fond of major portions of each and if I can make the marriage work, I think it has the potential to be a rocking way to develop apps. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-ExtJS-tp3882229p3882229.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
