Did a quick search and couldn't see anything so ticket raised:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4146 WICKET-4146
-
Eric is learning how to use Wicket and enjoying the experience so far...
--
View this message in context:
So is it a bug or a regression (because it was working on W1.4)? Even, if
the event is fired when leaving the tab, I don't understand why the server
reacts differently. How can it knows that the component isn't visible
anymoree???
Should I drop all these widget from my app? We use them a lot in
There is an improvement in Wicket 1.5 to not allow execution of
invisible component or even worse on disabled behavior for security
reasons.
It is possible to extend AjaxEditableLabel and configure it to allow
such executions.
Override
Hello,
is there a default way to determine when a user switches between tabs in an
AjaxTabbedPanel?
I see onAjaxUpdate(final AjaxRequestTarget target) but that is called after
the new tab has been set.
I would like to add a confirmation dialog before the new tab is set in case
the user had
may you follow something like this:
public class AjaxTabbedPanel extends TabbedPanel
{
public AjaxTabbedPanel(String id, ListITab tabs)
{
super(id, tabs);
setOutputMarkupId(true);
setVersioned(false);
}
@Override
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:57 AM, manuelbarzi manuelba...@gmail.com wrote:
may you follow something like this:
public class AjaxTabbedPanel extends TabbedPanel
{
public AjaxTabbedPanel(String id, ListITab tabs)
{
super(id, tabs);
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Bruno Borges bruno.bor...@gmail.com wrote:
After playing with Nested Forms in WIcket 1.4.18, I found out that the
onSubmit method of these forms is called at the end of the process.
If a parent form has a button and this button is submited, its onSubmit
method
Hello,
Could you please explain for what reason wicket for every page redirects
users to some other page by 302 code?
For example from /home user will be redirected to /home?1 etc.
It seems quite strange and I think, that this is much more strange for
Search Engines.
I found solution how to
A wicket autocomplete gives errors in Internet Explorer. The error is on
line 42 of wicket-autocomplete.js.
On that line stands the following code: objonkeyup=obj.onkeyup;
I'm using Wicket 1.5.1. And you can reproduce the problem on the wicket
examples:
Works OK for me.
No JS errors. Tested with IE9 in different browser modes and document
modes. Including Quirks.
Is it possible that it is some IE setting ?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Ann Baert ann.ba...@tvh.be wrote:
A wicket autocomplete gives errors in Internet Explorer. The error is on
I also see this error on the specified page with Internet Explorer 8
(WinXP SP3)
It does not matter if I enable or disable the compatibility feature.
Matt
On 2011-10-20 13:54, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Works OK for me.
No JS errors. Tested with IE9 in different browser modes and document
modes.
I think redirect is performed as a solution to double post problem. You can
disable it from RequestCycleSetting by setting it to One Pass Render.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Илья Нарыжный phan...@ydn.ru wrote:
Hello,
Could you please explain for what reason wicket for every page
Looks good for me also. Tested under IE 8, Windows XP.
Works OK for me.
No JS errors. Tested with IE9 in different browser modes and document
modes. Including Quirks.
Is it possible that it is some IE setting ?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Ann Baertann.ba...@tvh.be wrote:
A wicket
Another problem is that without ?3 if your user reloads the page (F5)
Wicket wont know which page instance to re-render and will create a
new instance of the page. I.e. the state will be lost.
In Wicket 1.4 ?wicket:interface=0:0:bla:1: is used to keep the page id.
If you don't want this special
ooops, I was wrong. I got the same problem.
I also see this error on the specified page with Internet Explorer 8
(WinXP SP3)
It does not matter if I enable or disable the compatibility feature.
Matt
On 2011-10-20 13:54, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Works OK for me.
No JS errors. Tested with IE9 in
I have discovered that this only occurs when running our app inside
IntelliJ. When we run it in tomcat directly, outside any IDE, I can't
get the problem to occur. Hopefully the problem will not appear at all
when running on the production server.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Colman
Can't upgrade... :-(
Political issues (read: conservative corporation with terrible decision
makers)
*Bruno Borges*
(21) 7672-7099
*www.brunoborges.com*
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Bruno Borges
Thank you, It's working but the code is quite ugly (lot of duplication just
to override the canCallListenerInterface() ).
I still doesn't understand how wicket is able to know that the component is
not visible in the browser.
Furthermore, I find problematic the fact that the behavior depends on
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Gaetan Zoritchak
g.zoritc...@moncoachfinance.com wrote:
Thank you, It's working but the code is quite ugly (lot of duplication just
to override the canCallListenerInterface() ).
I still doesn't understand how wicket is able to know that the component is
not
I still doesn't understand how wicket is able to know that the component is
not visible in the browser.
We don't understand this either.
Could you create a quickstart?
Sven
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Gaetan Zoritchak [mailto:g.zoritc...@moncoachfinance.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag,
That looks pretty good. I too am attempting to build a RIA with ExtJS using
Wicket as my back-end. On first look it seems like the two should be a
great fit as both rely heavily on building a hierarchical tree of
components. If I could build a set of custom wicket components to output
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Bruno Borges bruno.bor...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't upgrade... :-(
Political issues (read: conservative corporation with terrible decision
makers)
They let you use wicket, so they can't be too bad :)
Martijn
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Entropy blmulholl...@gmail.com wrote:
That looks pretty good. I too am attempting to build a RIA with ExtJS using
Wicket as my back-end. On first look it seems like the two should be a
great fit as both rely heavily on building a hierarchical tree of
That looks pretty good. I too am attempting to build a RIA with ExtJS using
Wicket as my back-end. On first look it seems like the two should be a
great fit as both rely heavily on building a hierarchical tree of
components. If I could build a set of custom wicket components to output
I am trying to map my requests in a special way to achieve a very simple
purpose
say the root website is abc.com and has several users and each use has a
home page , admin page , requests page etc
let us asume we have uers user1 and user 2
i want the urls to be coded as
abc.com/user1/admin
Thank you for your quick replies!
I have been trying to set up a quickstart with wicket version 1.5.2 to test
things out, but it seems like its not totally trivial to set up security
constraints in web.xml using jetty. I tried to add the following to my
web.xml:
security-constraint
my application has same problem, but it only throw socket error when IE 6 - 8
brower, chrome and IE9 has no the problem.
here is my question:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-there-ModalWindow-alternative-options-td3896443.html
i have test by wicket 1.5.2 take 2 version, the
Hi,
All my pages are generated dynamically in a particular project (including
Home).
Application.getHomePage() returns Class? extends Page
The trouble is that all my pages use the same WebPage class, based on the
name in the URL it determines which content to fetch.
Example:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Arjun Dhar dhar...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
All my pages are generated dynamically in a particular project (including
Home).
Application.getHomePage() returns Class? extends Page
The trouble is that all my pages use the same WebPage class, based on the
name in
29 matches
Mail list logo
