Re: Does [Parent|Child]HeaderRenderStrategy work with wicket:head tag?
Bug posted https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4235 -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Does-Parent-Child-HeaderRenderStrategy-work-with-wicket-head-tag-tp4075161p4079254.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
HttpsMapper creates HttpSession by default
Our Wicket application is stateless and doesn't need a HttpSession (the
JSessionID is disabled by default for some SEO reasons for all requests). In
Wicket 1.4 we use our own CodingStrategy implementation to switch between
the Http/Https protocols if a secure annotation (RequireHttps) for a page
class is present. This is not an option with Wicket 1.5 because coding
strategies are replaced by IRequestMapper implementations.
So we use the HttpsMapper as RootRequestMapper to switch over to Https. As
I've noticed, using the HttpsMapper forces the application to create a
HttpsSession by default, even if no secure page would be present. In my
opinion, session binding should be done within the HttpsRequestChecker class
(checkSecureIncoming) and only if the switch to the Https protocol is really
required. Or do I miss something?
Setting the HttpsConfig.setPreferStateful(false) is also not an option. In
that case we end up with two sessions per user.
HttpsMapper.java:
public IRequestHandler mapRequest(final Request request)
{
IRequestHandler requestHandler = delegate.mapRequest(request);
if (requestHandler != null)
{
final IRequestHandler httpsHandler =
checker.checkSecureIncoming(requestHandler,
httpsConfig);
// XXX do we need to check if httpsHandler is instance
of
SwitchProtocolRequestHandler
if (httpsConfig.isPreferStateful())
{
// we need to persist the session before a
redirect to https so the
session lasts
// across both http and https calls.
Session.get().bind();
}
requestHandler = httpsHandler;
}
return requestHandler;
}
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/HttpsMapper-creates-HttpSession-by-default-tp4079305p4079305.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: HttpsMapper creates HttpSession by default
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Dirk Forchel dirk.forc...@exedio.com wrote:
Our Wicket application is stateless and doesn't need a HttpSession (the
JSessionID is disabled by default for some SEO reasons for all requests). In
Wicket 1.4 we use our own CodingStrategy implementation to switch between
the Http/Https protocols if a secure annotation (RequireHttps) for a page
class is present. This is not an option with Wicket 1.5 because coding
strategies are replaced by IRequestMapper implementations.
So we use the HttpsMapper as RootRequestMapper to switch over to Https. As
I've noticed, using the HttpsMapper forces the application to create a
HttpsSession by default, even if no secure page would be present. In my
opinion, session binding should be done within the HttpsRequestChecker class
(checkSecureIncoming) and only if the switch to the Https protocol is really
required. Or do I miss something?
Setting the HttpsConfig.setPreferStateful(false) is also not an option. In
that case we end up with two sessions per user.
How that happens ?
This config option is there for exactly that purpose.
HttpsMapper.java:
public IRequestHandler mapRequest(final Request request)
{
IRequestHandler requestHandler = delegate.mapRequest(request);
if (requestHandler != null)
{
final IRequestHandler httpsHandler =
checker.checkSecureIncoming(requestHandler,
httpsConfig);
// XXX do we need to check if httpsHandler is instance
of
SwitchProtocolRequestHandler
if (httpsConfig.isPreferStateful())
{
// we need to persist the session before a
redirect to https so the
session lasts
// across both http and https calls.
Session.get().bind();
}
requestHandler = httpsHandler;
}
return requestHandler;
}
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/HttpsMapper-creates-HttpSession-by-default-tp4079305p4079305.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: HttpsMapper creates HttpSession by default
I'm not sure. But this is the comment within the source of the
HttpsConfig.class:
/**
* Sets whether or not a new session is created before redirecting from
{@code http} to {@code
* https}
* p
* BE VERY CAREFUL WHEN SETTING THIS VALUE TO {@code false}.
*
* If set to {@code false} it is possible that the session created when
in
{@code https} pages
* will not be accessible to {@code http} pages, and so you may end up
with
two sessions per
* user both potentially containing different login information.
* /p
*
* @param preferStateful
*/
public void setPreferStateful(boolean preferStateful)
{
this.preferStateful = preferStateful;
}
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/HttpsMapper-creates-HttpSession-by-default-tp4079305p4079330.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AjaxLazyLoadPanel question
Hello,
I'm facing the same problem as the Matt above but honestly I must admit
that I do not really understand Pedro's advice.
Did you manage to implement his advice, Matt? Could I get a little more
information about how this IAjaxCallDecorator might actually look like?
That would be a great help.
Thanks in advance,
Philip
2011/2/4 Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com
I Matt, try to decorate the AJAX javascript to show/hide the indicator
using
an IAjaxCallDecorator
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Matt Schmidt mschmid...@gmail.com wrote:
I currently have a DataGridView loaded inside of an AjaxLazyLoadPanel,
including the service call to get the data.
myLazyLoadPanel = new AjaxLazyLoadPanel(id, new
CollectionModelPojo())
{
public Component getLazyLoadComponent(String markupId) {
if(getDefaultModelObject() == null) {
setDefaultModelObject(myPojoService.readAll());
}
return new MyDataGridView(markupId, getDefaultModel()); //ignoring
casting for simplicity
}
}
That works great for loading the page before the service call is
complete.
But now I need to add a DropDownChoice to change the collection in the
data
grid via Ajax after the page is loaded. Is there anyway to get the
DataGridView to be replaced with an Ajax indicator (like on page load)
during an Ajax onchange event for the DropDownChoice? I've added an
Ajax
indicator to the DropDownChoice, but I would like the same behavior I get
on
page load for the AjaxLazyLoadPanel.
This is what I have for the drop down for starters:
myDropDownChoice.add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdateBehavior(onchange) {
protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
if(myDropDownChoice.getModelObject().equals(foo)) {
myLazyLoadPanel.setDefaultModelObject(myPojoService.readFoo());
}
//check other selections
target.addComponent(myLazyLoadPanel);
}
}
I may be looking at this entirely wrong... Any suggestions?
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: HttpsMapper creates HttpSession by default
This setting is to tell Wicket whether to create a http session before
going https.
Otherwise if there is no http session until now and you create it in
https request then this session wont be visible to any http request.
Setting it to false wont bind the Session (i.e. wont create http session).
Register SessingBindingListener in web.xml and put a breakpoint in it
to see where is created the session.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Dirk Forchel dirk.forc...@exedio.com wrote:
I'm not sure. But this is the comment within the source of the
HttpsConfig.class:
/**
* Sets whether or not a new session is created before redirecting from
{@code http} to {@code
* https}
* p
* BE VERY CAREFUL WHEN SETTING THIS VALUE TO {@code false}.
*
* If set to {@code false} it is possible that the session created
when in
{@code https} pages
* will not be accessible to {@code http} pages, and so you may end up
with
two sessions per
* user both potentially containing different login information.
* /p
*
* @param preferStateful
*/
public void setPreferStateful(boolean preferStateful)
{
this.preferStateful = preferStateful;
}
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/HttpsMapper-creates-HttpSession-by-default-tp4079305p4079330.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Purely XML / JSON Result Page
Thanks for the tips. I some help here too (in case anyone looking for the similar solution) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2086732/dynamic-markup-in-wicket -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Purely-XML-JSON-Result-Page-tp4075558p4079390.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: HttpsMapper creates HttpSession by default
I know, that this setting tells Wicket when to create the HttpSession. And it seems that if the HttpSession is created in the Https request, the created Session is not visible to any Http request. In Wicket 1.4 we never switch back to the Http protocol once the secure protocol is used. So probably this problem never occured. I try to use the listener to figure out what happens. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/HttpsMapper-creates-HttpSession-by-default-tp4079305p4079409.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Wicket 1.5.2, stalls on one tomcat
Hi I have a very strange problem. At a customers site we have 2 servers with 1 Tomcat 7 installed each. One day on one of the servers our application just stalled after loading the sign in page, when you click the login button. Im not sure this is a wicket problem. Heres what I've tried so far: - Restart Tomcat - Point the working application at the non working servers sql database, it still works. - Purge Tomcats session storage and temporary files - Restart the server - Redeploy the application, with the war from the working server (just to be sure) I've even tried setting up SQL Profiler and sniffing on the database connections, nothing strange goes on here. Just seems like the application stalls when you try to login. Keep in mind that this works without problems from the other server. regards Nino
Re: wicket 1.5.3 problems with cookies
hi martin, so yes previously I had a problem with unit tests when I was setting cookie and redirecting with throw new RestartResponseException(new MyOtherPage()); then you advised to used NonResettingRestartException but this for some reason (I had no time yet to investigate) is breaking unittest so now I am using setResponsePage(pageClass); now I try to test it live with jetty and gae and for both servers it is failing. (to redirect I use setResponsePage) pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket 1.5.2, stalls on one tomcat
Profile the stalled server with Visual VM? It should detect existing deadlocks... Hi I have a very strange problem. At a customers site we have 2 servers with 1 Tomcat 7 installed each. One day on one of the servers our application just stalled after loading the sign in page, when you click the login button. Im not sure this is a wicket problem. Heres what I've tried so far: - Restart Tomcat - Point the working application at the non working servers sql database, it still works. - Purge Tomcats session storage and temporary files - Restart the server - Redeploy the application, with the war from the working server (just to be sure) I've even tried setting up SQL Profiler and sniffing on the database connections, nothing strange goes on here. Just seems like the application stalls when you try to login. Keep in mind that this works without problems from the other server. regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket 1.5.2, stalls on one tomcat
THANKS! 2011/11/17 Andrea Del Bene adelb...@ciseonweb.it Profile the stalled server with Visual VM? It should detect existing deadlocks... Hi I have a very strange problem. At a customers site we have 2 servers with 1 Tomcat 7 installed each. One day on one of the servers our application just stalled after loading the sign in page, when you click the login button. Im not sure this is a wicket problem. Heres what I've tried so far: - Restart Tomcat - Point the working application at the non working servers sql database, it still works. - Purge Tomcats session storage and temporary files - Restart the server - Redeploy the application, with the war from the working server (just to be sure) I've even tried setting up SQL Profiler and sniffing on the database connections, nothing strange goes on here. Just seems like the application stalls when you try to login. Keep in mind that this works without problems from the other server. regards Nino --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 302 redirect loop
Hi, Thanks for the advice! I follwed and traced the problem. Think it's a combination of Wicket and Tomcat... When i send the request for http://localhost/, wicket get's the session from tomcat, renders the page and buffers the response (since ONE_PASS_RENDER isn't default). Wicket (1.5.3) also appends the ?1 and sends a 302 redirect to http://localhost/?1 (in the 302 response header the cookie get's correctly set - but not appended to the redirect URL). Tomcat (7.0.22) doesn't append jsessionid to an url like http://localhost/?1. Looks like it's still the empty path and tomcat problem that prohibits the appending of jsessionid. Now when I don't use cookies and follow the request to http://localhost/?1how should wicket know which session we're talking about? Please note that this problem doesn't exist when sending a request to e.g. http://localhost/login. I get a correct redirect to http://localhost/login;jsessionid=xx. I could think of the following workaround: 1.) For the homepage use ONE_PASS_RENDER Is this a tomcat/wicket combination problem or am I doing something wrong? Many thanks Willo On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote: I don't know of any other specific causes unfortunately... Try setting a breakpoint in RequestCycle#onBeginRequest() and see what happens. Try your page constructor too since it might be closer to the source of the problem. Good luck! Bertrand On 16/11/2011 12:21 PM, thomas willomitzer wrote: Hi, Thanks I checked but no getPageParameters() override ;) Regards Thomas On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote: Hi, I had a redirect loop once because I added an override to Page#getPageParameters() by mistake. I wanted to use my method to generate a new PageParameters instance for a page but overriding the Page method gave your result. It's worth a shot! Regards, Bertrand On 16/11/2011 11:40 AM, thomas willomitzer wrote: Dear All, I've managed to get the jsessionid appended correctly when requesting a page without cookies enabled (wicket 1.5.3, tomcat 7.0.22). I get curl -v --insecure https://localhost/ - Location: https://localhost/?1 curl -v --insecure https://localhost/?1 - Location: https://localhost/.;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909** **A3https://localhost/.;**jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3 https://localhost/.;**jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3https://localhost/.;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909A3 curl -v --insecure https://localhost/.;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909** **A3https://localhost/.;**jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3 https://localhost/.;**jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3https://localhost/.;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909A3- HTTP 404 change URL (erasing .) to curl -v --insecure https://localhost/;jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909** **A3https://localhost/;jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3 https://localhost/;**jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3https://localhost/;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909A3- Location: https://localhost/?1 When trying in a browser I get the warning that it's a redirect loop. Can somebody please point me to what I'm doing wrong here? Many Thanks Thomas --** --**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apa**che.orghttp://apache.org users-unsubscribe@**wicket.apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Forum vs list question
Hi Neill, I am in the same position as you. I prefer not to receive E-mails of all the posts and look via my browser instead. Once you have signed up, log in and: Visit the Apache Wicket › Users forum page Go to Options | Your subscription: Users forum (edit) Either Select Receive new topics only and Daily digest and click the Save Subscription button. or Click the Unsubscribe button. Believe it or not, if you follow the Save Subscription button step, then you will then receive no E-mails (well, I don't get any anyway)! Enjoy? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Forum-vs-list-question-tp4076276p4079663.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: EOFException(java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error)
jira issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3869 Is only in IE6, IE7, IE8 will occur in this problem? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/EOFException-java-net-SocketException-Connection-reset-by-peer-socket-write-error-tp4043286p4079862.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
@SpringBean scope, where does it start-end?
Hello, I am trying to integrate BIRT into Spring-Wicket combo. *The case:* So far, I wrote a class that instantiates report engine and added spring annotations. I already have /context:component-scan base-package=blah.blah.andmoreblah // in bean definition file. Now I can access it via @SpringBean annotation in panels-webpages etc... but *The Intent:* I have some classes (that extends ByteArrayResource) that simply configures the report engine to produce desired report. *The Problem:* On the other hand in the class that extends ByteArrayResource the @SpringBean annotated instance comes *null*. Any insights? - www.mehmetatas.info -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/SpringBean-scope-where-does-it-start-end-tp4080069p4080069.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: @SpringBean scope, where does it start-end?
Only o.a.w.Component and o.a.w.Behavior (since 1.5.3) are auto injected.
For anything else you need:
class MyClass {
@SpringBean private MyBean bean;
public MyClass() {
// my stuff
Injector.get().inject(this);
}
}
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:04 PM, bilgisever mehmetate...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to integrate BIRT into Spring-Wicket combo.
*The case:*
So far, I wrote a class that instantiates report engine and added spring
annotations. I already have
/context:component-scan base-package=blah.blah.andmoreblah //
in bean definition file. Now I can access it via @SpringBean annotation in
panels-webpages etc... but
*The Intent:*
I have some classes (that extends ByteArrayResource) that simply configures
the report engine to produce desired report.
*The Problem:*
On the other hand in the class that extends ByteArrayResource the
@SpringBean annotated instance comes *null*.
Any insights?
-
www.mehmetatas.info
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/SpringBean-scope-where-does-it-start-end-tp4080069p4080069.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: @SpringBean scope, where does it start-end?
in non component you can inject by Injector.get().inject(this) in constructor On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:34 PM, bilgisever mehmetate...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello, I am trying to integrate BIRT into Spring-Wicket combo. *The case:* So far, I wrote a class that instantiates report engine and added spring annotations. I already have /context:component-scan base-package=blah.blah.andmoreblah // in bean definition file. Now I can access it via @SpringBean annotation in panels-webpages etc... but *The Intent:* I have some classes (that extends ByteArrayResource) that simply configures the report engine to produce desired report. *The Problem:* On the other hand in the class that extends ByteArrayResource the @SpringBean annotated instance comes *null*. Any insights? - www.mehmetatas.info -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/SpringBean-scope-where-does-it-start-end-tp4080069p4080069.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- thank you, regards, Vineet Semwal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: @SpringBean scope, where does it start-end?
SpringBean magic will only work for components. If you want to use for non-componet you have to explicitly call Injector.get().inject(this); for wicket 1.5.x or InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this); for wicket 1.4.x Ernesto On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:04 PM, bilgisever mehmetate...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello, I am trying to integrate BIRT into Spring-Wicket combo. *The case:* So far, I wrote a class that instantiates report engine and added spring annotations. I already have /context:component-scan base-package=blah.blah.andmoreblah // in bean definition file. Now I can access it via @SpringBean annotation in panels-webpages etc... but *The Intent:* I have some classes (that extends ByteArrayResource) that simply configures the report engine to produce desired report. *The Problem:* On the other hand in the class that extends ByteArrayResource the @SpringBean annotated instance comes *null*. Any insights? - www.mehmetatas.info -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/SpringBean-scope-where-does-it-start-end-tp4080069p4080069.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Unchanging url's
Hello, I read many posts on this, tried may suggestions, must be stupid, but I can't figure it out. I'm using Wicket 1.5.3, an application with a number of tabbed panels. My application's url is, lets say http://localhost:9080/context/ When I enter this URL, the browse immediately changes this to http://localhost:9080/context/?0 I don't want that!! When I enter userdata and switch some tabs, nothing happens, but when I hit F5 the URL changes to http://localhost:9080/context/?9 or another number, depending on my activity. I don't want that!! When I enter passed url's like http://localhost:9080/context/?37 or http://localhost:9080/context/?154, I get the prefilled pages that correspond to those url's. I have no need for that!! I just want http://localhost:9080/context/ to be addressable from my favorites, that's all. Even CTRL+F5 doesn't give me a clean page, I have to remove the ?xx part with my mouse. Please help! -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Unchanging-url-s-tp4080178p4080178.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Unchanging url's
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8081143/components-not-reloading-on-url-change-in-wicket-1-5-2 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8135755/wicket-1-5-new-urls/8139152#8139152 On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:33 PM, hfriederichs h.friederi...@ohra.nl wrote: Hello, I read many posts on this, tried may suggestions, must be stupid, but I can't figure it out. I'm using Wicket 1.5.3, an application with a number of tabbed panels. My application's url is, lets say http://localhost:9080/context/ When I enter this URL, the browse immediately changes this to http://localhost:9080/context/?0 I don't want that!! When I enter userdata and switch some tabs, nothing happens, but when I hit F5 the URL changes to http://localhost:9080/context/?9 or another number, depending on my activity. I don't want that!! When I enter passed url's like http://localhost:9080/context/?37 or http://localhost:9080/context/?154, I get the prefilled pages that correspond to those url's. I have no need for that!! I just want http://localhost:9080/context/ to be addressable from my favorites, that's all. Even CTRL+F5 doesn't give me a clean page, I have to remove the ?xx part with my mouse. Please help! -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Unchanging-url-s-tp4080178p4080178.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: @SpringBean scope, where does it start-end?
Thanks it worked like charm. - www.mehmetatas.info -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/SpringBean-scope-where-does-it-start-end-tp4080069p4080367.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
Thanks for the laugh. Where are the irony tags? Sven Am 17.11.2011 16:44, schrieb Eric Kizaki: Violates Dry: You must repeat the component hierarchy of your widgets that are in HTML in Java Code for no good reason. If you move your widget around in the html it will break the Java and you get a stack trace if you change the nesting. You have to keep these two files synched. A JSP file is more maintainable. At least the view code is in one place. Not previewable: One of the supposed benefits of Wicket is a clean template that could make pages previewable for designers. First, we don't have seperate designers at my company. Second, it is better if the samer person does development and design. Third, if you use extends your page will not be priviewable outside an application server running Wicket. This supposed benefit does not exist. Violates MVC: It smashes view and controller code into the same Java file. You have code that regulates page flow and code that changes css attributes in the same file. Even Spring MVC had better separation of concerns. JSP/Servlets with Spring MVC is better. Excessively verbose and complicated: What is a LoadableDetachableModel? The learning curve for Wicket is immense. Breaks POJOS: A real POJO does not need to implement an interface or extend a class. Wicket forces your beans to be Serializable. This is like using EJBs in how it forced you to implement interfaces. Terrible AJAX: Compared to a few lines of jQuery AJAX is excessively complicated and verbose in Wicket. A lot of things like “AJAX” links should not be done via “AJAX” at all. Hiding a div on the client would simply be done with JavaScript on the client. Wicket better not require a server request for that. You also have no JSON support and good luck debugging any JavaScript or AJAX in Firefox. Instead you have to use the subpar Wicket debugging. HTML5: No support for HTML 5 form elements unless you upgrade to Wicket 1.5. You will get a stack trace. The upgrade to Wicket 1.5 is painful and will break your code. Good luck getting this to work with jQuery mobile. Bad Defaults: Most pages are stateless. The default for Wicket is stateful. So if I want a decent URL and a bookmarkable page I have to mount the page and use a bookmarkable page link with page parameters. Using page parameters is worse than how Spring MVC does binding. I have to keep doing this over and over for each page. There is too much work involved to get a decent stateless page with a nice URL. This should be the default. Interferes with other libraries: It screws up your jQuery code. It forces you into a restrictive way of doing web-development: the Wicket Way. Causes a redeploy whenever you add anything: Maybe Java developers are used to this, but in any other web development environment I do not need to redeploy after adding a text box to the page. It is completely absurd. Only with JRebel is this alleviated. No, embedded Jetty in debug mode still slow. Even a simple JSP file has hot reloading on Tomcat and if I make a change to my view code the changes are immediately viewable in the browser when I refresh. This is WITHOUT JRebel. HTTPSession Objects are not hard: Most pages do not need state. If you do use HTTPSession it is simple. Can you use a map? Then you can use HTTPSession. This is less comlicated than most Wicket code. Stateful Component based framework are a terrible idea: Even at the theoretical level this is a bad idea. It is a leaky abstraction over a simple request/response cycle. It made something simple and made it overly complicated. This remind me of Hibernate and ORMS. I disagree that we should abstract things to this level and do everything in verbose Java. People are dropping Hibernate and going back to native SQL and Spring JDBC template. SQL and the relational model are easy. Working with HTTP requests is easy too. What was wrong with JSPs/Servlets? Keep it simple stupid. We know JSF was too complicated and it was terrible. Spring MVC is better and has rest support. It just works with Spring and has great support for the JSON Jackson mapper. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Wicket-is-a-Flawed-Framework-tp4080411p4080411.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
Ah, it's been a while since a JSF/JSP zealot bothered to annoy Wicket users. Now go away and cook up a tag library or five. - Tor Iver
Can't Reset Form After DropDownChoice OnChange Handled
I have a drop down choice component, and when the selection changes, I udpate
various form fields by Ajax, in the form as follows:
*public HistoryDropDown(final String id, final MapK, ? map, final
Component dateField, final
TrackDetailModel model, final TrackAttribute attribute) {
super(id, map);
final String originalValue = model.getOriginalValue(attribute);
add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = -1;
@Override
protected void onUpdate(final AjaxRequestTarget target) {
// When
selection changes
final String newValue =
model.getAttributeValue(attribute); // What the
new choice?
if (newValue.equals(originalValue)) {
// If back to original value
dateField.setEnabled(false);
// Disable date field
model.restoreOriginalDateAndUser(attribute);
// Restore original data
} else {
// If changing to new
value
dateField.setEnabled(true);
// Enable date field
model.setDefaultDateAndUser(attribute);
// Effective date = today
}
// User =
current user
target.addComponent(dateField.getParent());
// Re-render fields
}
});
}
*
The updates work fine (the screen re-renders properly), but if I then click
the form's Reset button, nothing happens. I saw some other posts that said I
have to do a form.modelchanged(), but that didn't any effect.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Can-t-Reset-Form-After-DropDownChoice-OnChange-Handled-tp4080685p4080685.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
How to have a list of iframes ?
hello list,
I'd like to have a dynamically generated list of iframes in my page, where
each iframe has the same attributes except for its src attribute, which
should dynamically be inserted.
The iframes are embedded Youtube videos and I have a list of the urls to be
stuck in their src attributes. But my implementation does not work. The
error I get is
Last cause: A child with id 'videoframe' already exists:
[VideoListView [Component id = videoList]]
WicketMessage: Error attaching this container for rendering: [Page class =
my.package.page.VideoPage, id = 2, render count = 1]
In my VideoPage I have
public VideoPage() {
super();
videoListView = new VideoListView(videoList, new
LoadableDetachableModelListlt;String() {
protected ListString load() {
ListString urls = new ArrayListString();
// fill list with youtube urls
// ..
return urls;
}
});
add(videoListView);
}
private class VideoListView extends ListViewString {
public VideoListView(String name, final IModelListlt;String
urls) {
super(name, urls);
}
protected void populateItem(ListItemString listItem) {
final String url = listItem.getModelObject();
final WebMarkupContainer videoFrame = new
WebMarkupContainer(videoframe);
videoFrame.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(src, url));
// .. put other non-changing attributes here too
add(videoFrame);
}
}
and in my page I have
div wicket:id=videoList
iframe wicket:id=videoframe class=dance-video
width=425 height=349 src= frameborder=0 allowfullscreen/iframe
/div
Anyone has an idea how to achieve this ? I've also looked at InlineFrame (to
use instead of WebMarkupContainer) but it seems most concerned with
instantiating a Page to render in an iframe, if I'm correct.
thanks in advance,
kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-have-a-list-of-iframes-tp4080744p4080744.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to have a list of iframes ?
add(videoFrame);
You have to add the frame to the ListItem, i.e.:
listItem.add(videoFrame);
Sven
On 11/17/2011 06:15 PM, heikki wrote:
hello list,
I'd like to have a dynamically generated list of iframes in my page, where
each iframe has the same attributes except for its src attribute, which
should dynamically be inserted.
The iframes are embedded Youtube videos and I have a list of the urls to be
stuck in their src attributes. But my implementation does not work. The
error I get is
Last cause: A child with id 'videoframe' already exists:
[VideoListView [Component id = videoList]]
WicketMessage: Error attaching this container for rendering: [Page class =
my.package.page.VideoPage, id = 2, render count = 1]
In my VideoPage I have
public VideoPage() {
super();
videoListView = new VideoListView(videoList, new
LoadableDetachableModelListlt;String() {
protected ListString load() {
ListString urls = new ArrayListString();
// fill list with youtube urls
// ..
return urls;
}
});
add(videoListView);
}
private class VideoListView extends ListViewString {
public VideoListView(String name, final IModelListlt;String
urls) {
super(name, urls);
}
protected void populateItem(ListItemString listItem) {
final String url = listItem.getModelObject();
final WebMarkupContainer videoFrame = new
WebMarkupContainer(videoframe);
videoFrame.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(src, url));
// .. put other non-changing attributes here too
add(videoFrame);
}
}
and in my page I have
div wicket:id=videoList
iframe wicket:id=videoframe class=dance-video
width=425 height=349 src= frameborder=0 allowfullscreen/iframe
/div
Anyone has an idea how to achieve this ? I've also looked at InlineFrame (to
use instead of WebMarkupContainer) but it seems most concerned with
instantiating a Page to render in an iframe, if I'm correct.
thanks in advance,
kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-have-a-list-of-iframes-tp4080744p4080744.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Update Component on TextField Entry
Hi! I need a hint how to solve the following problem. I have a RepeaterView displaying a list of static links. Below there is a text field. As soon as something is entered in that textfield (not whitespace) I would like to replace those links with a list of completely different links containing a parameter with content from the text field. Both link lists have the same number of items. I was thinking to use AutoCompleteTextField to do that, but how do I replace those links from protected IteratorT getChoices(String input) ? Kind Regards Gregor -- How to find files on the Internet? FindFiles.net http://findfiles.net!
Re: wicket 302 redirect loop
as long as we are passing the /?1 url through servletresponse#encoderedirecturl() tomcat is responsible for appending the JSESSIONID if its not yet available in a cookie... -igor On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:16 AM, thomas willomitzer wi...@test.at wrote: Hi, Thanks for the advice! I follwed and traced the problem. Think it's a combination of Wicket and Tomcat... When i send the request for http://localhost/, wicket get's the session from tomcat, renders the page and buffers the response (since ONE_PASS_RENDER isn't default). Wicket (1.5.3) also appends the ?1 and sends a 302 redirect to http://localhost/?1 (in the 302 response header the cookie get's correctly set - but not appended to the redirect URL). Tomcat (7.0.22) doesn't append jsessionid to an url like http://localhost/?1. Looks like it's still the empty path and tomcat problem that prohibits the appending of jsessionid. Now when I don't use cookies and follow the request to http://localhost/?1how should wicket know which session we're talking about? Please note that this problem doesn't exist when sending a request to e.g. http://localhost/login. I get a correct redirect to http://localhost/login;jsessionid=xx. I could think of the following workaround: 1.) For the homepage use ONE_PASS_RENDER Is this a tomcat/wicket combination problem or am I doing something wrong? Many thanks Willo On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote: I don't know of any other specific causes unfortunately... Try setting a breakpoint in RequestCycle#onBeginRequest() and see what happens. Try your page constructor too since it might be closer to the source of the problem. Good luck! Bertrand On 16/11/2011 12:21 PM, thomas willomitzer wrote: Hi, Thanks I checked but no getPageParameters() override ;) Regards Thomas On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote: Hi, I had a redirect loop once because I added an override to Page#getPageParameters() by mistake. I wanted to use my method to generate a new PageParameters instance for a page but overriding the Page method gave your result. It's worth a shot! Regards, Bertrand On 16/11/2011 11:40 AM, thomas willomitzer wrote: Dear All, I've managed to get the jsessionid appended correctly when requesting a page without cookies enabled (wicket 1.5.3, tomcat 7.0.22). I get curl -v --insecure https://localhost/ - Location: https://localhost/?1 curl -v --insecure https://localhost/?1 - Location: https://localhost/.;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909** **A3https://localhost/.;**jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3 https://localhost/.;**jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3https://localhost/.;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909A3 curl -v --insecure https://localhost/.;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909** **A3https://localhost/.;**jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3 https://localhost/.;**jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3https://localhost/.;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909A3- HTTP 404 change URL (erasing .) to curl -v --insecure https://localhost/;jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909** **A3https://localhost/;jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3 https://localhost/;**jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3https://localhost/;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909A3- Location: https://localhost/?1 When trying in a browser I get the warning that it's a redirect loop. Can somebody please point me to what I'm doing wrong here? Many Thanks Thomas --** --**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apa**che.orghttp://apache.org users-unsubscribe@**wicket.apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
I'm curious why you wasted your time if you have already determined that Stateful, component-based frameworks are a terrible idea. Html5 + jQuery + Restlet is over -- http://www.restlet.org/ No framework is for everyone or even the best solution for every problem. If you have real suggestions for improvements: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET. If you're just trolling, I had a good laugh. This is not the framework you're looking for. You can go about your business. #jedimindtrick On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Wilhelmsen Tor Iver toriv...@arrive.nowrote: Ah, it's been a while since a JSF/JSP zealot bothered to annoy Wicket users. Now go away and cook up a tag library or five. - Tor Iver
Re: wicket 302 redirect loop
Fair enough ...
Looking at org.apache.catalina.connector.Response a url of e.g.
http://localhost/?1 results in a path of length 0 which doesn't append the
jsessionid.
if( sb.length() 0 ) { // jsessionid can't be first.
It's obviously a tomcat issue ... but given the fact that tomcat is widely
used ... can't we do something about that?
Well I did by using ONE_PASS_RENDER ;)
Thanks
Willo
/**
* Return the specified URL with the specified session identifier
* suitably encoded.
*
* @param url URL to be encoded with the session id
* @param sessionId Session id to be included in the encoded URL
*/
protected String toEncoded(String url, String sessionId) {
if ((url == null) || (sessionId == null))
return (url);
String path = url;
String query = ;
String anchor = ;
int question = url.indexOf('?');
if (question = 0) {
path = url.substring(0, question);
query = url.substring(question);
}
int pound = path.indexOf('#');
if (pound = 0) {
anchor = path.substring(pound);
path = path.substring(0, pound);
}
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(path);
if( sb.length() 0 ) { // jsessionid can't be first.
sb.append(;);
sb.append(ApplicationSessionCookieConfig.getSessionUriParamName(
request.getContext()));
sb.append(=);
sb.append(sessionId);
}
sb.append(anchor);
sb.append(query);
return (sb.toString());
}
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
as long as we are passing the /?1 url through
servletresponse#encoderedirecturl() tomcat is responsible for
appending the JSESSIONID if its not yet available in a cookie...
-igor
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:16 AM, thomas willomitzer wi...@test.at wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the advice! I follwed and traced the problem. Think it's a
combination of Wicket and Tomcat...
When i send the request for http://localhost/, wicket get's the session
from tomcat, renders the page and buffers the response (since
ONE_PASS_RENDER isn't default).
Wicket (1.5.3) also appends the ?1 and sends a 302 redirect to
http://localhost/?1 (in the 302 response header the cookie get's
correctly
set - but not appended to the redirect URL).
Tomcat (7.0.22) doesn't append jsessionid to an url like
http://localhost/?1.
Looks like it's still the empty path and tomcat problem that prohibits
the appending of jsessionid.
Now when I don't use cookies and follow the request to
http://localhost/?1how should wicket know which session we're talking
about?
Please note that this problem doesn't exist when sending a request to
e.g.
http://localhost/login. I get a correct redirect to
http://localhost/login;jsessionid=xx.
I could think of the following workaround:
1.) For the homepage use ONE_PASS_RENDER
Is this a tomcat/wicket combination problem or am I doing something
wrong?
Many thanks
Willo
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet
ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote:
I don't know of any other specific causes unfortunately...
Try setting a breakpoint in RequestCycle#onBeginRequest() and see what
happens. Try your page constructor too since it might be closer to the
source of the problem.
Good luck!
Bertrand
On 16/11/2011 12:21 PM, thomas willomitzer wrote:
Hi,
Thanks I checked but no getPageParameters() override ;)
Regards
Thomas
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet
ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote:
Hi,
I had a redirect loop once because I added an override to
Page#getPageParameters() by mistake. I wanted to use my method to
generate
a new PageParameters instance for a page but overriding the Page
method
gave your result.
It's worth a shot!
Regards,
Bertrand
On 16/11/2011 11:40 AM, thomas willomitzer wrote:
Dear All,
I've managed to get the jsessionid appended correctly when
requesting a
page without cookies enabled (wicket 1.5.3, tomcat 7.0.22).
I get
curl -v --insecure https://localhost/ - Location:
https://localhost/?1
curl -v --insecure https://localhost/?1 - Location:
https://localhost/.;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**
**A3
https://localhost/.;**jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3
https://localhost/.;**jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3
https://localhost/.;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909A3
curl -v --insecure
https://localhost/.;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**
**A3
https://localhost/.;**jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3
https://localhost/.;**jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3
https://localhost/.;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909A3-
HTTP 404
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
I am just a user of Wicket, but this make me laugh, since we are desperately trying to get out of the JSP nightmare and have found Wicket a quite nice framework. Nice. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Trying to use IAjaxCallDecorator after Modal Window close
Hi all - I'm trying to add a busy indicator after a modal window is closed. In my use case, the WindowClosedCallback's onClose method is performing a few operations, and I just want to let the user know that the system is actually doing something. I noticed that CloseButtonBehavior has a getAjaxCallDecorator method, but in this case my Modal Window is being closed by ModalWindow.closeCurrent(target). I'm currently using Wicket 1.4.18, but should be upgrading to 1.5.3 relatively soon. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Trying-to-use-IAjaxCallDecorator-after-Modal-Window-close-tp4081142p4081142.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
Is this April fool's day? Seriously? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Wicket-is-a-Flawed-Framework-tp4080411p4081149.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
This is not an april fool's day, it is just an opinion of an http://www.linkedin.com/pub/eric-kizaki/30/2b1/1a4 inexperienced developer . Eric, if you have troubles in understanding wicket, you are definitely doing it wrong. Wicket is not a silver bullet, but it is a great tool when comparing to existing technologies. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Wicket-is-a-Flawed-Framework-tp4080411p4081174.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
Ooohh... I better double check what I'm writing on this list, Since the FBI is around ... ;) On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Alex Objelean alex.objel...@gmail.comwrote: This is not an april fool's day, it is just an opinion of an http://www.linkedin.com/pub/eric-kizaki/30/2b1/1a4 inexperienced developer . Eric, if you have troubles in understanding wicket, you are definitely doing it wrong. Wicket is not a silver bullet, but it is a great tool when comparing to existing technologies. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Wicket-is-a-Flawed-Framework-tp4080411p4081174.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 302 redirect loop
would adding a bogus query param help there? so the url will look like
this: localhost/?1bogus=1
-igor
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:21 AM, thomas willomitzer wi...@test.at wrote:
Fair enough ...
Looking at org.apache.catalina.connector.Response a url of e.g.
http://localhost/?1 results in a path of length 0 which doesn't append the
jsessionid.
if( sb.length() 0 ) { // jsessionid can't be first.
It's obviously a tomcat issue ... but given the fact that tomcat is widely
used ... can't we do something about that?
Well I did by using ONE_PASS_RENDER ;)
Thanks
Willo
/**
* Return the specified URL with the specified session identifier
* suitably encoded.
*
* @param url URL to be encoded with the session id
* @param sessionId Session id to be included in the encoded URL
*/
protected String toEncoded(String url, String sessionId) {
if ((url == null) || (sessionId == null))
return (url);
String path = url;
String query = ;
String anchor = ;
int question = url.indexOf('?');
if (question = 0) {
path = url.substring(0, question);
query = url.substring(question);
}
int pound = path.indexOf('#');
if (pound = 0) {
anchor = path.substring(pound);
path = path.substring(0, pound);
}
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(path);
if( sb.length() 0 ) { // jsessionid can't be first.
sb.append(;);
sb.append(ApplicationSessionCookieConfig.getSessionUriParamName(
request.getContext()));
sb.append(=);
sb.append(sessionId);
}
sb.append(anchor);
sb.append(query);
return (sb.toString());
}
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
as long as we are passing the /?1 url through
servletresponse#encoderedirecturl() tomcat is responsible for
appending the JSESSIONID if its not yet available in a cookie...
-igor
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:16 AM, thomas willomitzer wi...@test.at wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the advice! I follwed and traced the problem. Think it's a
combination of Wicket and Tomcat...
When i send the request for http://localhost/, wicket get's the session
from tomcat, renders the page and buffers the response (since
ONE_PASS_RENDER isn't default).
Wicket (1.5.3) also appends the ?1 and sends a 302 redirect to
http://localhost/?1 (in the 302 response header the cookie get's
correctly
set - but not appended to the redirect URL).
Tomcat (7.0.22) doesn't append jsessionid to an url like
http://localhost/?1.
Looks like it's still the empty path and tomcat problem that prohibits
the appending of jsessionid.
Now when I don't use cookies and follow the request to
http://localhost/?1how should wicket know which session we're talking
about?
Please note that this problem doesn't exist when sending a request to
e.g.
http://localhost/login. I get a correct redirect to
http://localhost/login;jsessionid=xx.
I could think of the following workaround:
1.) For the homepage use ONE_PASS_RENDER
Is this a tomcat/wicket combination problem or am I doing something
wrong?
Many thanks
Willo
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet
ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote:
I don't know of any other specific causes unfortunately...
Try setting a breakpoint in RequestCycle#onBeginRequest() and see what
happens. Try your page constructor too since it might be closer to the
source of the problem.
Good luck!
Bertrand
On 16/11/2011 12:21 PM, thomas willomitzer wrote:
Hi,
Thanks I checked but no getPageParameters() override ;)
Regards
Thomas
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet
ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote:
Hi,
I had a redirect loop once because I added an override to
Page#getPageParameters() by mistake. I wanted to use my method to
generate
a new PageParameters instance for a page but overriding the Page
method
gave your result.
It's worth a shot!
Regards,
Bertrand
On 16/11/2011 11:40 AM, thomas willomitzer wrote:
Dear All,
I've managed to get the jsessionid appended correctly when
requesting a
page without cookies enabled (wicket 1.5.3, tomcat 7.0.22).
I get
curl -v --insecure https://localhost/ - Location:
https://localhost/?1
curl -v --insecure https://localhost/?1 - Location:
https://localhost/.;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**
**A3
https://localhost/.;**jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3
https://localhost/.;**jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3
https://localhost/.;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909A3
curl -v --insecure
https://localhost/.;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**
**A3
Re: AjaxLazyLoadPanel question
you can replace the lazy load panel instance:
//check other selections
myLazyLoadPanel=myLazyLoadPanel.replaceWith(new
MyLazyLoadPanel(myLazyLoadPanel.getId(), ..)
target.addComponent(myLazyLoadPanel);
this will reset the state of lazyloadpanel to the not-yet-loaded
-igor
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Matt Schmidt mschmid...@gmail.com wrote:
I currently have a DataGridView loaded inside of an AjaxLazyLoadPanel,
including the service call to get the data.
myLazyLoadPanel = new AjaxLazyLoadPanel(id, new CollectionModelPojo()) {
public Component getLazyLoadComponent(String markupId) {
if(getDefaultModelObject() == null) {
setDefaultModelObject(myPojoService.readAll());
}
return new MyDataGridView(markupId, getDefaultModel()); //ignoring
casting for simplicity
}
}
That works great for loading the page before the service call is complete.
But now I need to add a DropDownChoice to change the collection in the data
grid via Ajax after the page is loaded. Is there anyway to get the
DataGridView to be replaced with an Ajax indicator (like on page load)
during an Ajax onchange event for the DropDownChoice? I've added an Ajax
indicator to the DropDownChoice, but I would like the same behavior I get on
page load for the AjaxLazyLoadPanel.
This is what I have for the drop down for starters:
myDropDownChoice.add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdateBehavior(onchange) {
protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
if(myDropDownChoice.getModelObject().equals(foo)) {
myLazyLoadPanel.setDefaultModelObject(myPojoService.readFoo());
}
//check other selections
target.addComponent(myLazyLoadPanel);
}
}
I may be looking at this entirely wrong... Any suggestions?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Purely XML / JSON Result Page
why use a page at all? why not simple mount a resource or a IRequestHandler that writes out json? -igor On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:11 AM, TH Lim ssh...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the tips. I some help here too (in case anyone looking for the similar solution) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2086732/dynamic-markup-in-wicket -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Purely-XML-JSON-Result-Page-tp4075558p4079390.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 302 redirect loop
No I'm afraid ... just tried
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
would adding a bogus query param help there? so the url will look like
this: localhost/?1bogus=1
-igor
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:21 AM, thomas willomitzer wi...@test.at
wrote:
Fair enough ...
Looking at org.apache.catalina.connector.Response a url of e.g.
http://localhost/?1 results in a path of length 0 which doesn't append
the
jsessionid.
if( sb.length() 0 ) { // jsessionid can't be first.
It's obviously a tomcat issue ... but given the fact that tomcat is
widely
used ... can't we do something about that?
Well I did by using ONE_PASS_RENDER ;)
Thanks
Willo
/**
* Return the specified URL with the specified session identifier
* suitably encoded.
*
* @param url URL to be encoded with the session id
* @param sessionId Session id to be included in the encoded URL
*/
protected String toEncoded(String url, String sessionId) {
if ((url == null) || (sessionId == null))
return (url);
String path = url;
String query = ;
String anchor = ;
int question = url.indexOf('?');
if (question = 0) {
path = url.substring(0, question);
query = url.substring(question);
}
int pound = path.indexOf('#');
if (pound = 0) {
anchor = path.substring(pound);
path = path.substring(0, pound);
}
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(path);
if( sb.length() 0 ) { // jsessionid can't be first.
sb.append(;);
sb.append(ApplicationSessionCookieConfig.getSessionUriParamName(
request.getContext()));
sb.append(=);
sb.append(sessionId);
}
sb.append(anchor);
sb.append(query);
return (sb.toString());
}
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
as long as we are passing the /?1 url through
servletresponse#encoderedirecturl() tomcat is responsible for
appending the JSESSIONID if its not yet available in a cookie...
-igor
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:16 AM, thomas willomitzer wi...@test.at
wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the advice! I follwed and traced the problem. Think it's a
combination of Wicket and Tomcat...
When i send the request for http://localhost/, wicket get's the
session
from tomcat, renders the page and buffers the response (since
ONE_PASS_RENDER isn't default).
Wicket (1.5.3) also appends the ?1 and sends a 302 redirect to
http://localhost/?1 (in the 302 response header the cookie get's
correctly
set - but not appended to the redirect URL).
Tomcat (7.0.22) doesn't append jsessionid to an url like
http://localhost/?1.
Looks like it's still the empty path and tomcat problem that
prohibits
the appending of jsessionid.
Now when I don't use cookies and follow the request to
http://localhost/?1how should wicket know which session we're talking
about?
Please note that this problem doesn't exist when sending a request to
e.g.
http://localhost/login. I get a correct redirect to
http://localhost/login;jsessionid=xx.
I could think of the following workaround:
1.) For the homepage use ONE_PASS_RENDER
Is this a tomcat/wicket combination problem or am I doing something
wrong?
Many thanks
Willo
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet
ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote:
I don't know of any other specific causes unfortunately...
Try setting a breakpoint in RequestCycle#onBeginRequest() and see
what
happens. Try your page constructor too since it might be closer to
the
source of the problem.
Good luck!
Bertrand
On 16/11/2011 12:21 PM, thomas willomitzer wrote:
Hi,
Thanks I checked but no getPageParameters() override ;)
Regards
Thomas
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet
ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote:
Hi,
I had a redirect loop once because I added an override to
Page#getPageParameters() by mistake. I wanted to use my method to
generate
a new PageParameters instance for a page but overriding the Page
method
gave your result.
It's worth a shot!
Regards,
Bertrand
On 16/11/2011 11:40 AM, thomas willomitzer wrote:
Dear All,
I've managed to get the jsessionid appended correctly when
requesting a
page without cookies enabled (wicket 1.5.3, tomcat 7.0.22).
I get
curl -v --insecure https://localhost/ - Location:
https://localhost/?1
curl -v --insecure https://localhost/?1 - Location:
https://localhost/.;jsessionid=D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**
**A3
https://localhost/.;**jsessionid=**D62D2D693854214C847E7A75439909**A3
Re: Dealing with 3 choice components
On 11/16/2011 10:38 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
Are you referring to the example from book Apache-Wicket-Cookbook,
page n°34? If so, how do you populate the list of C? Maybe you should
not set to null B model when you change value in A.
If you can try to give an example of values from A,B and C.
I solved using Ajax.
In onUpdate() of AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior of A, I add both
components (B and C) to the target.
thanks for the help
A
On 11/16/2011 07:33 PM, Alberto wrote:
On 11/16/2011 06:06 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
Hi,
can you elaborate a little bit more what behavior you want to achieve?
I mean, C becomes empty because A#onSelectionChanged sets its model
to null. This should not be strange.
Yes, sounds obvious to me too. But I found an examples with 2
dropdownchoice where in onSelectionChanged() of the first one is set to
null the model of the second one.
For two choices works well.
Maybe is a wrong pattern, but I not found anything useful.
Do you have other solutions?
A
I have a form with with 3 choice components:
A) DropDownChoice
B) DropDownChoice
C) ListMultipleChoice
The values of B depend on selected value of A.
The values of C depend on selected values of A and B
I override the wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications() and
onSelectionChanged() methods of A and B.
A#onSelectionChanged
@Override
protected void onSelectionChanged(IntegerSelectChoice newSelection) {
super.onSelectionChanged(newSelection);
SearchForm.this.getModelObject().setInstrument(null);
SearchForm.this.getModelObject().setParams(null);
}
B#onSelectionChanged
@Override
protected void onSelectionChanged(IntegerSelectChoice newSelection) {
super.onSelectionChanged(newSelection);
SearchForm.this.getModelObject().setParams(null);
}
In A I set to null the model value of both B and C.
In B I set to null the model value only of B.
This code works only on the startup of the form. When I change the
value in A the list of C become empty. I have to change the value of
B to fill C.
http://www.corriere.it/index.shtml?refresh_ce
How can I manage this?
A
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 302 redirect loop
so what do we need to do to fix it on our end?
-igor
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:34 AM, thomas willomitzer wi...@test.at wrote:
No I'm afraid ... just tried
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
would adding a bogus query param help there? so the url will look like
this: localhost/?1bogus=1
-igor
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:21 AM, thomas willomitzer wi...@test.at
wrote:
Fair enough ...
Looking at org.apache.catalina.connector.Response a url of e.g.
http://localhost/?1 results in a path of length 0 which doesn't append
the
jsessionid.
if( sb.length() 0 ) { // jsessionid can't be first.
It's obviously a tomcat issue ... but given the fact that tomcat is
widely
used ... can't we do something about that?
Well I did by using ONE_PASS_RENDER ;)
Thanks
Willo
/**
* Return the specified URL with the specified session identifier
* suitably encoded.
*
* @param url URL to be encoded with the session id
* @param sessionId Session id to be included in the encoded URL
*/
protected String toEncoded(String url, String sessionId) {
if ((url == null) || (sessionId == null))
return (url);
String path = url;
String query = ;
String anchor = ;
int question = url.indexOf('?');
if (question = 0) {
path = url.substring(0, question);
query = url.substring(question);
}
int pound = path.indexOf('#');
if (pound = 0) {
anchor = path.substring(pound);
path = path.substring(0, pound);
}
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(path);
if( sb.length() 0 ) { // jsessionid can't be first.
sb.append(;);
sb.append(ApplicationSessionCookieConfig.getSessionUriParamName(
request.getContext()));
sb.append(=);
sb.append(sessionId);
}
sb.append(anchor);
sb.append(query);
return (sb.toString());
}
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
as long as we are passing the /?1 url through
servletresponse#encoderedirecturl() tomcat is responsible for
appending the JSESSIONID if its not yet available in a cookie...
-igor
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:16 AM, thomas willomitzer wi...@test.at
wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the advice! I follwed and traced the problem. Think it's a
combination of Wicket and Tomcat...
When i send the request for http://localhost/, wicket get's the
session
from tomcat, renders the page and buffers the response (since
ONE_PASS_RENDER isn't default).
Wicket (1.5.3) also appends the ?1 and sends a 302 redirect to
http://localhost/?1 (in the 302 response header the cookie get's
correctly
set - but not appended to the redirect URL).
Tomcat (7.0.22) doesn't append jsessionid to an url like
http://localhost/?1.
Looks like it's still the empty path and tomcat problem that
prohibits
the appending of jsessionid.
Now when I don't use cookies and follow the request to
http://localhost/?1how should wicket know which session we're talking
about?
Please note that this problem doesn't exist when sending a request to
e.g.
http://localhost/login. I get a correct redirect to
http://localhost/login;jsessionid=xx.
I could think of the following workaround:
1.) For the homepage use ONE_PASS_RENDER
Is this a tomcat/wicket combination problem or am I doing something
wrong?
Many thanks
Willo
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet
ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote:
I don't know of any other specific causes unfortunately...
Try setting a breakpoint in RequestCycle#onBeginRequest() and see
what
happens. Try your page constructor too since it might be closer to
the
source of the problem.
Good luck!
Bertrand
On 16/11/2011 12:21 PM, thomas willomitzer wrote:
Hi,
Thanks I checked but no getPageParameters() override ;)
Regards
Thomas
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet
ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote:
Hi,
I had a redirect loop once because I added an override to
Page#getPageParameters() by mistake. I wanted to use my method to
generate
a new PageParameters instance for a page but overriding the Page
method
gave your result.
It's worth a shot!
Regards,
Bertrand
On 16/11/2011 11:40 AM, thomas willomitzer wrote:
Dear All,
I've managed to get the jsessionid appended correctly when
requesting a
page without cookies enabled (wicket 1.5.3, tomcat 7.0.22).
I get
curl -v --insecure https://localhost/ - Location:
https://localhost/?1
curl -v --insecure https://localhost/?1 - Location:
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
This is not an april fool's day, it is just an opinion of an inexperienced developer. This illustrates one of the traditional logical fallacies. If you can't effectively attack the argument, attack the speaker. My biggest problem with Wicket is that I haven't found any documentation on the web that really lets me get a solid grasp on the key concepts. I read a lot of poorly written documentation, weak examples and forum posts dealing with something that is only vaguely related to my goals, maybe learn a fragment of useful info, and then suffer while trying to apply it. I haven't looked a Wicket in Action or other Wicket Books, but I have not heard good things. Also, this is the Internet Age and this is web programming. I have no problem finding documentation on other web programming languages/frameworks like I do with Wicket. If I am wrong, point me to some solid learning materials, and you stand a chance of changing my mind. geraldkw -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Wicket-is-a-Flawed-Framework-tp4080411p4081206.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
IMHO, your post looks at the wrong question (i.e., is Wicket perfect?). Of course it's not. No framework is. A better question is: How does it compare to OTHER frameworks? This is subjective of course, but in my personal opinion it is far better than any other framework I've tried (Struts, JSP, ColdFusion, etc.). Yes, it has a learning curve, but so does any framework. Where I DO agree with you is that the documentation can be improved. But from what I've seen, it's improving as it matures. RAM /abr./: Rarely Adequate Memory. From: geraldkw geral...@gmail.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Date: 11/17/2011 02:54 PM Subject:Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework This is not an april fool's day, it is just an opinion of an inexperienced developer. This illustrates one of the traditional logical fallacies. If you can't effectively attack the argument, attack the speaker. My biggest problem with Wicket is that I haven't found any documentation on the web that really lets me get a solid grasp on the key concepts. I read a lot of poorly written documentation, weak examples and forum posts dealing with something that is only vaguely related to my goals, maybe learn a fragment of useful info, and then suffer while trying to apply it. I haven't looked a Wicket in Action or other Wicket Books, but I have not heard good things. Also, this is the Internet Age and this is web programming. I have no problem finding documentation on other web programming languages/frameworks like I do with Wicket. If I am wrong, point me to some solid learning materials, and you stand a chance of changing my mind. geraldkw -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Wicket-is-a-Flawed-Framework-tp4080411p4081206.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org ** This email and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or privileged for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any use, review, disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance by others, and any forwarding of this email or its contents, without the express permission of the sender is strictly prohibited by law. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately, delete the e-mail and destroy all copies. **
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
First ofc all I do not see any need to convince you you can take it or leave it. 1 there is an awesome set of examples if you search for wicket examples, also there are a lot of other extensions or plug ins in wicket extensions , wicket stuff, wi query j query that support all ajax functionality. This forum as you noticed is great to get place to get answers. As far as not having as extensive of documentation wicket is relatively newer so obviously it will take a bit. --Original Message-- From: geraldkw To: users@wicket.apache.org ReplyTo: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework Sent: Nov 17, 2011 12:05 PM This is not an april fool's day, it is just an opinion of an inexperienced developer. This illustrates one of the traditional logical fallacies. If you can't effectively attack the argument, attack the speaker. My biggest problem with Wicket is that I haven't found any documentation on the web that really lets me get a solid grasp on the key concepts. I read a lot of poorly written documentation, weak examples and forum posts dealing with something that is only vaguely related to my goals, maybe learn a fragment of useful info, and then suffer while trying to apply it. I haven't looked a Wicket in Action or other Wicket Books, but I have not heard good things. Also, this is the Internet Age and this is web programming. I have no problem finding documentation on other web programming languages/frameworks like I do with Wicket. If I am wrong, point me to some solid learning materials, and you stand a chance of changing my mind. geraldkw -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Wicket-is-a-Flawed-Framework-tp4080411p4081206.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Exception Handling in 1.5
Hey, any idea how can I get the page/page class of the page that was being rendered when the exception happened? I was depending on that in 1.4 to determine the type of page I needed to return, for example if I am in the context of a modal window, I was showing a message in the window, and a close button. If I was in a normal page, I was showing the full error page with errors et all. I tried Class pageClass = ((IPageClassRequestHandler)cycle.getActiveRequestHandler()).getPageClass(); But that throws an NPE - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Exception Handling in 1.5
hrm. you cant yet. but you can check if you are in an ajax request or not by using webrequest.isajax() so you can implement that particular usecase without the page. -igor On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Nelson Segura nsegu...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, any idea how can I get the page/page class of the page that was being rendered when the exception happened? I was depending on that in 1.4 to determine the type of page I needed to return, for example if I am in the context of a modal window, I was showing a message in the window, and a close button. If I was in a normal page, I was showing the full error page with errors et all. I tried Class pageClass = ((IPageClassRequestHandler)cycle.getActiveRequestHandler()).getPageClass(); But that throws an NPE - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Can't Reset Form After DropDownChoice OnChange Handled
what does your reset code look like?
-igor
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:00 AM, aksarben rwada...@up.com wrote:
I have a drop down choice component, and when the selection changes, I udpate
various form fields by Ajax, in the form as follows:
*public HistoryDropDown(final String id, final MapK, ? map, final
Component dateField, final
TrackDetailModel model, final TrackAttribute attribute) {
super(id, map);
final String originalValue = model.getOriginalValue(attribute);
add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = -1;
@Override
protected void onUpdate(final AjaxRequestTarget target) {
// When
selection changes
final String newValue =
model.getAttributeValue(attribute); // What the
new choice?
if (newValue.equals(originalValue)) {
// If back to original value
dateField.setEnabled(false);
// Disable date field
model.restoreOriginalDateAndUser(attribute);
// Restore original data
} else {
// If changing to
new value
dateField.setEnabled(true);
// Enable date field
model.setDefaultDateAndUser(attribute);
// Effective date = today
}
// User =
current user
target.addComponent(dateField.getParent());
// Re-render fields
}
});
}
*
The updates work fine (the screen re-renders properly), but if I then click
the form's Reset button, nothing happens. I saw some other posts that said I
have to do a form.modelchanged(), but that didn't any effect.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Can-t-Reset-Form-After-DropDownChoice-OnChange-Handled-tp4080685p4080685.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Update Component on TextField Entry
use the TextField component and add OnChangeAjaxBehavior to it, then from inside onEvent() you can repaint the list. -igor On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Gregor Kaczor gkac...@gmx.de wrote: Hi! I need a hint how to solve the following problem. I have a RepeaterView displaying a list of static links. Below there is a text field. As soon as something is entered in that textfield (not whitespace) I would like to replace those links with a list of completely different links containing a parameter with content from the text field. Both link lists have the same number of items. I was thinking to use AutoCompleteTextField to do that, but how do I replace those links from protected IteratorT getChoices(String input) ? Kind Regards Gregor -- How to find files on the Internet? FindFiles.net http://findfiles.net! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Debugging a NPE from a ModelPropertyResolver
I am trying to use Igor's wicket-validation-bean project, and I've managed to make a mistake where I'm getting a NullPointerException from when ValidationForm attempts to add property validators. Unfortunately, I can't tell what property it's trying to attach validators for here, as the exception message does not say. Is there any way I can get a more useful message? The stack trace of the cause is (The resulting stack trace has proprietary information) Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException at net.ftlines.wicket.validation.bean.ReflectableProperty.init(ReflectableProperty.java:46) at net.ftlines.wicket.validation.bean.ReflectableProperty.init(ReflectableProperty.java:98) at net.ftlines.wicket.validation.bean.ModelPropertyResolver.resolve(ModelPropertyResolver.java:35) at net.ftlines.wicket.validation.bean.ValidationContext.resolveProperty(ValidationContext.java:80) at net.ftlines.wicket.validation.bean.ValidationForm$1.component(ValidationForm.java:170) at net.ftlines.wicket.validation.bean.ValidationForm$1.component(ValidationForm.java:163) at org.apache.wicket.util.visit.Visits.visitChildren(Visits.java:143) at org.apache.wicket.util.visit.Visits.visitChildren(Visits.java:122) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.visitChildren(MarkupContainer.java:908) at net.ftlines.wicket.validation.bean.ValidationForm.addPropertyValidators(ValidationForm.java:162) at net.ftlines.wicket.validation.bean.ValidationForm.onBeforeRender(ValidationForm.java:155) at org.apache.wicket.Component.internalBeforeRender(Component.java:981) at org.apache.wicket.Component.beforeRender(Component.java:1015) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onBeforeRenderChildren(MarkupContainer.java:1785) ... 56 more Respectfully, Eric Jablow This communication, along with any attachments, is covered by federal and state law governing electronic communications and may contain company proprietary and legally privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please reply immediately to the sender and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
Nice post, Eric! Wicket people are a humorous folk and always appreciate good entertainment :-) Am 17.11.2011 um 22:02 schrieb anant.a...@gmail.com: First ofc all I do not see any need to convince you you can take it or leave it. 1 there is an awesome set of examples if you search for wicket examples, also there are a lot of other extensions or plug ins in wicket extensions , wicket stuff, wi query j query that support all ajax functionality. This forum as you noticed is great to get place to get answers. As far as not having as extensive of documentation wicket is relatively newer so obviously it will take a bit. --Original Message-- From: geraldkw To: users@wicket.apache.org ReplyTo: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework Sent: Nov 17, 2011 12:05 PM This is not an april fool's day, it is just an opinion of an inexperienced developer. This illustrates one of the traditional logical fallacies. If you can't effectively attack the argument, attack the speaker. My biggest problem with Wicket is that I haven't found any documentation on the web that really lets me get a solid grasp on the key concepts. I read a lot of poorly written documentation, weak examples and forum posts dealing with something that is only vaguely related to my goals, maybe learn a fragment of useful info, and then suffer while trying to apply it. I haven't looked a Wicket in Action or other Wicket Books, but I have not heard good things. Also, this is the Internet Age and this is web programming. I have no problem finding documentation on other web programming languages/frameworks like I do with Wicket. If I am wrong, point me to some solid learning materials, and you stand a chance of changing my mind. geraldkw -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Wicket-is-a-Flawed-Framework-tp4080411p4081206.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
I must admit that I agree with you. While I think Wicket is a great framework, the documentation is not up to par. This tool seems a little too elitist. If you're strong enough you will find a great framework. It's a shame because even if the mailing list is very effective it slows down the adoption of wicket. 2011/11/17 geraldkw geral...@gmail.com This is not an april fool's day, it is just an opinion of an inexperienced developer. This illustrates one of the traditional logical fallacies. If you can't effectively attack the argument, attack the speaker. My biggest problem with Wicket is that I haven't found any documentation on the web that really lets me get a solid grasp on the key concepts. I read a lot of poorly written documentation, weak examples and forum posts dealing with something that is only vaguely related to my goals, maybe learn a fragment of useful info, and then suffer while trying to apply it. I haven't looked a Wicket in Action or other Wicket Books, but I have not heard good things. Also, this is the Internet Age and this is web programming. I have no problem finding documentation on other web programming languages/frameworks like I do with Wicket. If I am wrong, point me to some solid learning materials, and you stand a chance of changing my mind. geraldkw -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Wicket-is-a-Flawed-Framework-tp4080411p4081206.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
You might/might not be right about documentation. This is usually true of most frameworks when you move from the Hello World program to a real life app. The original message said little to nothing about documentations. It is basically comparing Wicket to JSPs, and saying JSP are better. It might be true for some people. For me, that have been working in JSPs for a long while, it is very humorous :D - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
ValidationForm.addPropertyValidators sometimes looks for child properties in parent's model
I have some model classes with JSR 303 validation annotations, and I have some
FormComponentPanels for each. Some of these will be nested. To test that the
Wicket validation is correct, I'm creating a ValidationForm, which contains one
of my panels, which contains another of my panels, and I am tying my form to a
local minimal test object without the other fields I will be using later. I am
using a CompoundPropertyModel. When I have the WicketTester initialize the
ValidationForm, it looks for the 'parent' field in the minimal test object,
which does exist. Then, I get at line 302 of AbstractPropertyModel,
return PropertyResolver.getPropertyGetter(expression, target);
I get a call with expression being child, and target being the local test
object. Were expression parent.child, this would succeed, as it would call
getParent().getChild(). However, I'm not sure whether this is my bug or the
wicket-validation-bean library's.
Incidentally, I'm getting an interesting misfeature from the validation; the
order in which the validations are performed seems to be nondeterministic. This
means that the test below fails sometimes.
tester.assertFeedback(path:to:panel, new String[] {messageA,
messageB});
Often, when I reverse the order of messageA and messageB, the next test fails
too! Perhaps Wicket 1.5.3 can have WicketTester.assertFeedback(String path,
SetString messages).
Finally, I might need to avoid FormComponentPanels in the future, as some of
the inner ones will be swapped in and out of the page depending on the user's
choices. I realize that the only panels that will be instrumented are the ones
in the Form when it is originally configured.
Thanks in advance.
Respectfully,
Eric Jablow
This communication, along with any attachments, is covered by federal and state
law governing electronic communications and may contain company proprietary and
legally privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, use or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this in error, please reply immediately to the sender and delete
this message. Thank you.
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
* there are three books written about wicket: two for beginners and one for intermediate-advanced users. * there is a searchable mailing list archive that spans years upon years of users asking questions and getting answers. * there is a wiki that lists examples and has some good articles. * there is stack overflow questions and answers. is there an answer to every single possible question out there? of course not. no framework has that. look at projects like spring and hibernate. do those have great documentation? i bet you would say yes. are their mailing lists any less busy than our own? no. so what does that say? if i had to make up a number i would say that armed with the resources i listed you would be able to answer about 80% of your own questions. and i think that is a pretty good number. there is a very active user list to help you answer questions you cant answer yourself, usually faster then a commercial support contract. for free. not too shabby. -igor On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Gaetan Zoritchak g.zoritc...@moncoachfinance.com wrote: I must admit that I agree with you. While I think Wicket is a great framework, the documentation is not up to par. This tool seems a little too elitist. If you're strong enough you will find a great framework. It's a shame because even if the mailing list is very effective it slows down the adoption of wicket. 2011/11/17 geraldkw geral...@gmail.com This is not an april fool's day, it is just an opinion of an inexperienced developer. This illustrates one of the traditional logical fallacies. If you can't effectively attack the argument, attack the speaker. My biggest problem with Wicket is that I haven't found any documentation on the web that really lets me get a solid grasp on the key concepts. I read a lot of poorly written documentation, weak examples and forum posts dealing with something that is only vaguely related to my goals, maybe learn a fragment of useful info, and then suffer while trying to apply it. I haven't looked a Wicket in Action or other Wicket Books, but I have not heard good things. Also, this is the Internet Age and this is web programming. I have no problem finding documentation on other web programming languages/frameworks like I do with Wicket. If I am wrong, point me to some solid learning materials, and you stand a chance of changing my mind. geraldkw -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Wicket-is-a-Flawed-Framework-tp4080411p4081206.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Debugging a NPE from a ModelPropertyResolver
it seems like there is a buggy implementation of IPropertyReflectionAwareModel somewhere. did you implement your own model that implements that interface? seems like there is a model somewhere that is a IPropertyReflectionAwareModel but it returns null for all getSetter/Getter/Field() methods... i will add an exception so it will be easier to flag where this is happenning, maybe you can try with a snapshot -igor On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Jablow, Eric R eric.jab...@mantech.com wrote: I am trying to use Igor's wicket-validation-bean project, and I've managed to make a mistake where I'm getting a NullPointerException from when ValidationForm attempts to add property validators. Unfortunately, I can't tell what property it's trying to attach validators for here, as the exception message does not say. Is there any way I can get a more useful message? The stack trace of the cause is (The resulting stack trace has proprietary information) Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException at net.ftlines.wicket.validation.bean.ReflectableProperty.init(ReflectableProperty.java:46) at net.ftlines.wicket.validation.bean.ReflectableProperty.init(ReflectableProperty.java:98) at net.ftlines.wicket.validation.bean.ModelPropertyResolver.resolve(ModelPropertyResolver.java:35) at net.ftlines.wicket.validation.bean.ValidationContext.resolveProperty(ValidationContext.java:80) at net.ftlines.wicket.validation.bean.ValidationForm$1.component(ValidationForm.java:170) at net.ftlines.wicket.validation.bean.ValidationForm$1.component(ValidationForm.java:163) at org.apache.wicket.util.visit.Visits.visitChildren(Visits.java:143) at org.apache.wicket.util.visit.Visits.visitChildren(Visits.java:122) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.visitChildren(MarkupContainer.java:908) at net.ftlines.wicket.validation.bean.ValidationForm.addPropertyValidators(ValidationForm.java:162) at net.ftlines.wicket.validation.bean.ValidationForm.onBeforeRender(ValidationForm.java:155) at org.apache.wicket.Component.internalBeforeRender(Component.java:981) at org.apache.wicket.Component.beforeRender(Component.java:1015) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onBeforeRenderChildren(MarkupContainer.java:1785) ... 56 more Respectfully, Eric Jablow This communication, along with any attachments, is covered by federal and state law governing electronic communications and may contain company proprietary and legally privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please reply immediately to the sender and delete this message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ValidationForm.addPropertyValidators sometimes looks for child properties in parent's model
inline,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Jablow, Eric R eric.jab...@mantech.com wrote:
I have some model classes with JSR 303 validation annotations, and I have
some FormComponentPanels for each. Some of these will be nested. To test that
the Wicket validation is correct, I'm creating a ValidationForm, which
contains one of my panels, which contains another of my panels, and I am
tying my form to a local minimal test object without the other fields I will
be using later. I am using a CompoundPropertyModel. When I have the
WicketTester initialize the ValidationForm, it looks for the 'parent' field
in the minimal test object, which does exist. Then, I get at line 302 of
AbstractPropertyModel,
return PropertyResolver.getPropertyGetter(expression, target);
I get a call with expression being child, and target being the local test
object. Were expression parent.child, this would succeed, as it would call
getParent().getChild(). However, I'm not sure whether this is my bug or the
wicket-validation-bean library's.
this is probably a misuse of the compound property model, which is
evil anyways. you have to create your components with ids that match
the path from the root object, so if you want to access person.address
property you cant put a text field with id address into a
webmarkupcontainer of id person, you have to add a text field with
component id person.address
Incidentally, I'm getting an interesting misfeature from the validation; the
order in which the validations are performed seems to be nondeterministic.
i dont think the spec defines order
This means that the test below fails sometimes.
tester.assertFeedback(path:to:panel, new String[] {messageA,
messageB});
Often, when I reverse the order of messageA and messageB, the next test fails
too! Perhaps Wicket 1.5.3 can have WicketTester.assertFeedback(String path,
SetString messages).
maybe you can attach a patch to our jira
Finally, I might need to avoid FormComponentPanels in the future, as some of
the inner ones will be swapped in and out of the page depending on the user's
choices. I realize that the only panels that will be instrumented are the
ones in the Form when it is originally configured.
thats not the case. components under the validationform are
instrumented before every render so its safe to swap things in and
out.
-igor
Thanks in advance.
Respectfully,
Eric Jablow
This communication, along with any attachments, is covered by federal and
state law governing electronic communications and may contain company
proprietary and legally privileged information. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this in error, please reply immediately to
the sender and delete this message. Thank you.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Debugging a NPE from a ModelPropertyResolver
No, we are using only the stock models, I think. In any case, the particular test class uses CompoundPropertyModel. From: Igor Vaynberg [igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 7:24 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Debugging a NPE from a ModelPropertyResolver it seems like there is a buggy implementation of IPropertyReflectionAwareModel somewhere. did you implement your own model that implements that interface? seems like there is a model somewhere that is a IPropertyReflectionAwareModel but it returns null for all getSetter/Getter/Field() methods... i will add an exception so it will be easier to flag where this is happenning, maybe you can try with a snapshot -igor This communication, along with any attachments, is covered by federal and state law governing electronic communications and may contain company proprietary and legally privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please reply immediately to the sender and delete this message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Debugging a NPE from a ModelPropertyResolver
if you create a testcase and attach it as a pull request i can take a look. or a quickstart attached elsewhere would also work. -igor On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Jablow, Eric R eric.jab...@mantech.com wrote: No, we are using only the stock models, I think. In any case, the particular test class uses CompoundPropertyModel. From: Igor Vaynberg [igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 7:24 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Debugging a NPE from a ModelPropertyResolver it seems like there is a buggy implementation of IPropertyReflectionAwareModel somewhere. did you implement your own model that implements that interface? seems like there is a model somewhere that is a IPropertyReflectionAwareModel but it returns null for all getSetter/Getter/Field() methods... i will add an exception so it will be easier to flag where this is happenning, maybe you can try with a snapshot -igor This communication, along with any attachments, is covered by federal and state law governing electronic communications and may contain company proprietary and legally privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please reply immediately to the sender and delete this message. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
i'm baffled when people say the documentation is poor, the javadocs are excellent and like igor said there are some great books (blogs too!). books and blogs get outdated fast since technlogy is rapidly advancing, so *use the source luke!*. Not only will you learn Wicket, but I guarantee your Java skills will improve. awesome examples: https://github.com/apache/wicket https://github.com/apache/wicket (scan over the unit test, best way to learn any framework not just wicket) https://github.com/55minutes/fiftyfive-wicket https://github.com/55minutes/fiftyfive-wicket (fantastic) https://github.com/42Lines https://github.com/42Lines https://github.com/wicketstuff/core https://github.com/wicketstuff/core (a gem, tons of examples on how to pretty much do anything) http://code.google.com/p/wiquery/source/checkout http://code.google.com/p/wiquery/source/checkout https://github.com/jolira/wicket-stateless https://github.com/jolira/wicket-stateless (wicket stateless is excellent, even easier with wicket 1.5) https://github.com/reaktor/oegyscroll https://github.com/reaktor/oegyscroll (endless pagination) http://code.google.com/p/wiquery/source/browse/core http://code.google.com/p/wiquery/source/browse/core (jquery) http://code.google.com/p/jqwicket/source/browse/ http://code.google.com/p/jqwicket/source/browse/ (jquery, learn from the code and roll your own if it doesn't fit your needs, super easy https://github.com/rjnichols/visural-wicket https://github.com/rjnichols/visural-wicket (great ui tools) https://xaloon.googlecode.com/svn/ https://xaloon.googlecode.com/svn/ (excellent!) rob -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Wicket-is-a-Flawed-Framework-tp4080411p4082034.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
As gerald mentioned address the content - not the speaker, much more effective. i'll address a few of your points and bring up a few of my own. I'm sure the others can be addressed with thoughtful/intelligent responses. *Violates DRY*: There is a reason that HTML is separated from your corresponding Java component (not every html snippet has to have a component btw). Behavior is not allowed in your HTML and that makes me happy. I can have a Human Factors/Web designer do what they do best. Design a beautiful, high fidelity prototype that has taken actual user need in mind with plain ol HTML/JS/CSS. I've seen data driven UI's done by backend programmers - not so nice. I know because I've done them myself. Not having behavior embedded in your view like a JSP/Facelet means that when something goes wrong with a page, I have one place to look - in the corresponding Java component. No hidden loops tucked away in that page, no calls to a Java API embedded within a mess of HTML code - clean separation. *Breaks POJOS*: The data being stored in your model doesn't have to implement an interface. See this response http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/confusion-about-Wicket-models-and-serialization-td1933714.html A couple of things I think Wicket could improve upon is when you *don't* want back button support and having to worry about PageMaps being stored in the users session disk. As this is a corner case for the most part in the web app world, I can live with what I have. In that same vein, having to deal with PageExpiration exceptions when back button support is not needed and I don't want my users to encounter this when an Ajax action takes place. Again this is not the norm and there's a workaround but it's hacky. As mentioned no UI framework is perfect. All have their strengths and weaknesses and usually those depend on your point of view, coding style, time of day... -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Wicket-is-a-Flawed-Framework-tp4080411p4082041.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
AjaxEditableLabel inside of AjaxEditableLabel
Hello, I have two AjaxEditableLabel components. I use jQuery to place one component inside of another when the user views the page. The problem is that when the user clicks inside of the inner AjaxEditableLabel it goes into edit mode but right after that the outer AjaxEditableLabel goes into edit mode. How can I prevent the outer AjaxEditableLabel from going into edit mode? Thanks, Alec - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
Currently a link to this mail is the most popular on dzone: http://www.dzone.com/links/apache_wicket_is_a_flawed_framework.html Attila
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
I really liked the comment by javakata on that post. Counters every argument with a counter-example and doesn't attack the speaker once. 2011/11/18 Attila Király kiralyattila...@gmail.com: Currently a link to this mail is the most popular on dzone: http://www.dzone.com/links/apache_wicket_is_a_flawed_framework.html Attila -- Jeroen Steenbeeke www.fortuityframework.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
Sensational news are always a hit, even when not true. Any tool can be misused. With great power comes great responsibility. -Nino 2011/11/18 Attila Király kiralyattila...@gmail.com Currently a link to this mail is the most popular on dzone: http://www.dzone.com/links/apache_wicket_is_a_flawed_framework.html Attila
Re: Wicket 1.5.2, stalls on one tomcat
So I digged into this and discovered something strange. On the server that was working it had jre 6u24 and on the one not working it had jre 6u29. I could'nt restart the server, but after installing jdk 6u25 it actually worked.. This is not good. It could prove hard to replicate with other framework stacks, Im using a combo of mybatis, guice 3, wicket 1.5.3.. Anybody else using this on jre 6u29 on tomcat 7? regards Nino 2011/11/17 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com THANKS! 2011/11/17 Andrea Del Bene adelb...@ciseonweb.it Profile the stalled server with Visual VM? It should detect existing deadlocks... Hi I have a very strange problem. At a customers site we have 2 servers with 1 Tomcat 7 installed each. One day on one of the servers our application just stalled after loading the sign in page, when you click the login button. Im not sure this is a wicket problem. Heres what I've tried so far: - Restart Tomcat - Point the working application at the non working servers sql database, it still works. - Purge Tomcats session storage and temporary files - Restart the server - Redeploy the application, with the war from the working server (just to be sure) I've even tried setting up SQL Profiler and sniffing on the database connections, nothing strange goes on here. Just seems like the application stalls when you try to login. Keep in mind that this works without problems from the other server. regards Nino --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AjaxEditableLabel inside of AjaxEditableLabel
Hi, You'll need to stop the propagation of the event. To do that you'll have to override org.apache.wicket.extensions.ajax.markup.html.AjaxEditableLabel.EditorAjaxBehavior.onComponentTag(ComponentTag) On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Alec Swan alecs...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have two AjaxEditableLabel components. I use jQuery to place one component inside of another when the user views the page. The problem is that when the user clicks inside of the inner AjaxEditableLabel it goes into edit mode but right after that the outer AjaxEditableLabel goes into edit mode. How can I prevent the outer AjaxEditableLabel from going into edit mode? Thanks, Alec - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
