RE: AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior, required fields and validation

2012-01-03 Thread Michal Wegrzyn
Any ideas here? Should I provide a quickstart? Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Michal Wegrzyn [mailto:michal.wegr...@onior.com] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 23:07 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior, required fields and

Re: AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior, required fields and validation

2012-01-03 Thread Sven Meier
Hi, are you validating all form components or just the one which triggered the ajax request? You know AjaxFormSubmitBehavior? Sven Am 03.01.2012 09:32, schrieb Michal Wegrzyn: Any ideas here? Should I provide a quickstart? Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From:

Re: AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior, required fields and validation

2012-01-03 Thread Martin Grigorov
Additionally keyup for select is not the best event. People prefer using the mouse to change the value. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Sven Meier s...@meiers.net wrote: Hi, are you validating all form components or just the one which triggered the ajax request? You know

RE: AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior, required fields and validation

2012-01-03 Thread Michal Wegrzyn
Hi Sven, When event is triggered I check all components with #isValid(). I am not sure if validation is performed after every ajax update or only after submit? I am aware of AjaxFormSubmitBehavior, but I want to check fields after every user action, so user can know error immediately and not

Re: AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior, required fields and validation

2012-01-03 Thread Sven Meier
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior processes a single component only (change input, validate, convert), so it doesn't make sense to validate all components. In that case you should use AjaxFormSubmitBehavior, which processes the whole form. Sven Am 03.01.2012 10:26, schrieb Michal Wegrzyn:

Re: Altering TextField content from within AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior

2012-01-03 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, Take a look at Wicket Ajax Debug window. Maybe there is some JavaScript error during the replacement of the DOM node for this textfield. Otherwise all looks OK to me. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:46 PM, HugoSilva alisonsilva...@gmail.com wrote: Hello guys, I'm new to Wicket and working with

StringResourceModels doesn't seem to detach properly

2012-01-03 Thread Einar Bjerve
If a StringResourceModel contains a model for property substitutions, and there has not been assigned a component it is relative to on construction time, it will not detach the property substitution model. If there is assigned a component on construction time, the property substitution model

Re: StringResourceModels doesn't seem to detach properly

2012-01-03 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, It is intended. IModel#detach() is called only if this model is assigned to a component. Since no one calls #detach() on the StringResourceModel it has no idea when to call detach() on its inner model. You need to call SRM.detach() in #onDetach() in the component where it is used. Then it

Re: Altering TextField content from within AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior

2012-01-03 Thread HugoSilva
Thank you Martin, I have just done what you said. It doesnt show anything in the debug window. It remains blank! By the other hand, when a change the combo box value it shows the ajax command! It means that the command is not being executed, right? Is there something that I can do to force its

Re: Altering TextField content from within AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior

2012-01-03 Thread HugoSilva
I solved the issue Instead of a direct call to jQuery.ajax(), I called wicketAjaxGet() function. I think that wicket has to do some stuff beforehand and when you call wicketAjaxGet() it is forced to do it. Thanks a lot -- View this message in context:

Re: Hide page version query parameters

2012-01-03 Thread Taneli Korri
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: add the nofollow attribute to such links. All the links had it from the start. The crawlers from the big companies (Google, Bing etc) obey it, but some smaller ones do not. Anyways, I fixed the problem by filtering

Re: signOut and port

2012-01-03 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:38 PM, brettTi bret...@hotmail.com wrote: We're running a wicket app on jetty and having an issue with signout. The app runs on port 8443 and we have iptables redirecting from port 443. This lets us go to https://ourap.lab without port numbers and without having the

Wicket on Google App Engine

2012-01-03 Thread Daniel Watrous
Hi, I've been working for a few days to get a wicket application going for Google App Engine with mixed results. I hope these questions aren't too noobie for this list? There are a couple of really old articles which Google brings up first:

Re: Wicket on Google App Engine

2012-01-03 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, gae-initializer project provides https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/blob/master/jdk-1.6-parent/gae-initializer-parent/gae-initializer/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/gae/GaeInitializer.java which is an implementation of org.apache.wicket.IInitializer and declares it in