RE: Specified expiration page not being shown
I have narrowed the behaviour that prevents our MyExpiredPage appearing
to this code below, specifically the StringEqualsValidator.
captchaToken = new
RequiredTextField("captchaToken",
new PropertyModel(this,
"captchaEntered"))
{
@Override
protected final void onComponentTag(final
ComponentTag tag)
{
super.onComponentTag(tag);
// clear the field after each render
if ( captchaToken.hasErrorMessage() ) {
tag.put("value", "");
}
}
};
captchaToken.add(new StringEqualsValidator(
captcha.getAnswer() ));
public class StringEqualsValidator implements IValidator {
private final String toCompare;
public StringEqualsValidator(String str) {
toCompare = str;
}
@Override
public void validate(IValidatable validatable) {
final String input = validatable.getValue();
if (StringUtils.equals(input, toCompare) == false) {
error(validatable, "notequal");
}
}
private void error(IValidatable validatable, String
errorKey) {
ValidationError error = new ValidationError();
error.addMessageKey(getClass().getSimpleName() + "." +
errorKey);
validatable.error(error);
}
}
> -Original Message-
> From: Dale Ogilvie [mailto:dale_ogil...@trimble.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 30 May 2012 9:52 a.m.
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Specified expiration page not being shown
>
> Hi,
>
> This is for wicket 1.4.20.
>
> In our WebApplication subclass we have used:
>
> getApplicationSettings().setPageExpiredErrorPage(MyExpiredPage.class);
>
> However after session has expired on one of our pages, if I submit the
(fairly
> complex) form, the form error message is shown. By this I mean that
page
> component validation fires and validation of an object from session
(now
> defunct) fails and the page is redrawn with an error message in the
feedback
> panel. The expired page IS displayed if an ajax backed combo is used
on the
> same form, only form submission avoids the expiry page.
>
> Why might it be that our MyExpiredPage is not being shown in the form
> submission case? We want our expired page to be displayed
consistently.
>
> Thanks for any suggestions as to where to look for the issue.
>
> Dale
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Getting more stale page exception in wicket 1.5.6
But according the below link, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4454 The page should be repainted instead of showing ComponentNotFoundException. I am using wicket 1.5.6. Why am I seeing ComponentNotFoundException? Anyway to fix this? -Suresh -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Getting-more-stale-page-exception-in-wicket-1-5-6-tp4649492p4649568.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Getting more stale page exception in wicket 1.5.6
I believe org.apache.wicket.settings.IPageSettings#setRecreateMountedPagesAfterExpiry() is default to true. So I didn't set anything in my application. I mounted all the pages. I am handling only couple of exceptions on my application and for others I just return 'null' in onException() method. Hope I am not doing anything wrong here. -Suresh -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Getting-more-stale-page-exception-in-wicket-1-5-6-tp4649492p4649567.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Specified expiration page not being shown
Hi, This is for wicket 1.4.20. In our WebApplication subclass we have used: getApplicationSettings().setPageExpiredErrorPage(MyExpiredPage.class); However after session has expired on one of our pages, if I submit the (fairly complex) form, the form error message is shown. By this I mean that page component validation fires and validation of an object from session (now defunct) fails and the page is redrawn with an error message in the feedback panel. The expired page IS displayed if an ajax backed combo is used on the same form, only form submission avoids the expiry page. Why might it be that our MyExpiredPage is not being shown in the form submission case? We want our expired page to be displayed consistently. Thanks for any suggestions as to where to look for the issue. Dale - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
BigDecimal field automatic validation
Hello, I am using CompoundPropertyModel with some text fields. One of them is: Later, when I try to enter invalid value for that field like "qwerty" (not decimal type), I got validation message that wrong value entered. Even if I have not added type validator. But today, after I try to enter non-decimal value, it does not validates this value and throws exception: Any ideas, why this automatic validation for text field with generics does not work anymore? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/BigDecimal-field-automatic-validation-tp4649563.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
BigDecimal field automatic validation
Hello, I am using CompoundPropertyModel with some text fields. One of them is: Later, when I try to enter invalid value for that field like "qwerty" (not decimal type), I got validation message that wrong value entered. Even if I have not added type validator. But today, after I try to enter non-decimal value, it does not validates this value and throws exception: Any ideas, why this automatic validation for text field with generics does not work anymore? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/BigDecimal-field-automatic-validation-tp4649562.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
BigDecimal field automatic validation
Hello, I am using CompoundPropertyModel with some text fields. One of them is: Later, when I try to enter invalid value for that field like "qwerty" (not decimal type), I got validation message that wrong value entered. Even if I have not added type validator. But today, after I try to enter non-decimal value, it does not validates this value and throws exception: Any ideas, why this automatic validation for text field with generics does not work anymore? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/BigDecimal-field-automatic-validation-tp4649561.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
BigDecimal field automatic validation
Hello, I am using CompoundPropertyModel with some text fields. One of them is: Later, when I try to enter invalid value for that field like "qwerty" (not decimal type), I got validation message that wrong value entered. Even if I have not added type validator. But today, after I try to enter non-decimal value, it does not validates this value and throws exception: Any ideas, why this automatic validation for text field with generics does not work anymore? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/BigDecimal-field-automatic-validation-tp4649560.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Pretty URLs for AjaxLazyLoadPanel
You can also use url like: path/to/page/tab2 where 'tab2' is an indexed parameter. In this case you will have its value in the page's constructor and you can load the page with 'tab2' pre-selected. On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:51 PM, kevjay wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. This is what I was looking for. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Pretty-URLs-for-AjaxLazyLoadPanel-tp4649499p4649555.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Pretty URLs for AjaxLazyLoadPanel
Thanks for the explanation. This is what I was looking for. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Pretty-URLs-for-AjaxLazyLoadPanel-tp4649499p4649555.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Pretty URLs for AjaxLazyLoadPanel
Hi, You can simulate this by using the fragment part of the url, a.k.a. the hash. For example the url may look like: path/to/page#tab2 Then the page will be loaded with tab1 selected but a onDomReady script can click on tab2 if it is not the currently selected and an Ajax call will do the switch. This is how sites like Twitter, GMail, Facebook,... work but they do some more work to not show you the page with tab1 for better user experience. On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:21 PM, kevjay wrote: > Thanks for the reply Martin. Basically, my use case is to provide a "pretty" > URL that will have the non-default tab already selected. The desired tab is > selected if I provide a URL like > http://localhost:/?1-1.ILinkListener-tabs-tabs~container-tabs-2-link, > but I was hoping to be able to control what these URLs looked like. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Pretty-URLs-for-AjaxLazyLoadPanel-tp4649499p4649552.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Pretty URLs for AjaxLazyLoadPanel
Thanks for the reply Martin. Basically, my use case is to provide a "pretty" URL that will have the non-default tab already selected. The desired tab is selected if I provide a URL like http://localhost:/?1-1.ILinkListener-tabs-tabs~container-tabs-2-link, but I was hoping to be able to control what these URLs looked like. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Pretty-URLs-for-AjaxLazyLoadPanel-tp4649499p4649552.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Getting more stale page exception in wicket 1.5.6
Hi, It is a bit more complicated. On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:00 PM, sudeivas wrote: > With the above code changes, I made a simple test case, > > 1. Ajax Button which will throw StalePageException. > Result: The page reloaded itself without going to the error page. > > 2. Ajax Button which will throw PageExpiredException. > Result: Error page This is correct. Only MountedMapper can "revive" a page if org.apache.wicket.settings.IPageSettings#setRecreateMountedPagesAfterExpiry() is true. This is because MountedMapper knows the Page's class and is able to create a new instance. If only the page id is available then we do not know which page class to use. > > 3. Ajax Button which will throw ComponentNotFoundException. > Result: Error page See the inline comments in org.apache.wicket.request.handler.ListenerInterfaceRequestHandler#respond for more info about this. > > I believe for all the above use cases, the page should reload instead of > going to the error page. > > Please let me know if I missing something. Advice: Avoid handling Wicket's internals in your code unless really necessary. > > Thanks, > Suresh > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Getting-more-stale-page-exception-in-wicket-1-5-6-tp4649492p4649550.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Getting more stale page exception in wicket 1.5.6
With the above code changes, I made a simple test case, 1. Ajax Button which will throw StalePageException. Result: The page reloaded itself without going to the error page. 2. Ajax Button which will throw PageExpiredException. Result: Error page 3. Ajax Button which will throw ComponentNotFoundException. Result: Error page I believe for all the above use cases, the page should reload instead of going to the error page. Please let me know if I missing something. Thanks, Suresh -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Getting-more-stale-page-exception-in-wicket-1-5-6-tp4649492p4649550.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: decorating html with wicket
If I understand you correctly, your aim is to be able to rapidly prototype
processes to be reviewed by customers/POs etc. Wouldn't a tool like "Balsamiq
Mockups" or some other wireframing tool be more suitable for that purpose?
You also mentioned that the prototype should be created "by some one who do not
know how to program", with your solution this person at least needs to have
knowledge about Wicket Validators (including der Java package + class name +
parameters).
In my experience it is best to create a throw-away wireframe Mockup, and after
the customer agreed to it, you start coding this in HTML/JS/Java. I don't like
the idea too much to introduce additional complex logic into Wicket just fore
wireframing/mockup purposes (as mentioned, a person without Wicket knowledge
can't use this anyway).
Just my $0.02,
-Tom
On 29.05.2012, 15:03h Fernando Wermus wrote:
> Tom,
>Something else. I experienced the advantages to have mock up pages
> working in another company with Adobe Flex. These pages are added to the
> analysis and the clients could have in advance a vivid experience.
>
>
> Fernando Wermus.
>
> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Fernando Wermus > wrote:
>
>> Tom,
>> Thanks you for the review.
>>
>> The idea is that some pages are not implemented, tough they are declared
>> by some one who do not know how to program. A page implemented by us read
>> the form and instance all the components. We have wizards and they can
>> show the mock up to third workers. When they are accepted, the programmers
>> finish the work.
>>
>>
>> Fernando Wermus.
>>
>> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Thomas Götz wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not convinced yet that this is really a good idea (how to deal with
>>> constructor arguments for validators? What is the advantage of having all
>>> in html effectively?) but as a starting point you could look at
>>> AbstractMarkupFilter (e.g. see how WicketRemoveTagHandler and other
>>> implementations work).
>>>
>>> To add your own MarkupFilter implementation, do the following:
>>>
>>>
>>> public class MyMarkupFactory extends MarkupFactory {
>>>
>>> @Override
>>> public MarkupParser newMarkupParser(MarkupResourceStream resource) {
>>> final MarkupParser markupParser = super.newMarkupParser(resource);
>>> markupParser.add(new MyMarkupFilter());
>>> return markupParser;
>>> }
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> and register MyMarkupFactory in your Application class:
>>>
>>> @Override
>>> public void init() {
>>> super.init();
>>> getMarkupSettings().setMarkupFactory(new MyMarkupFactory());
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -Tom
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28.05.2012, 21:25h Fernando Wermus wrote:
>>>
Hi all,
I was wondering if there is some solution already done like this:
>>> wicket:fieldtype="java.lang.String"*
*wicket:validators="com.mycompany.MyValidator1,
com.mycompany.MyValidator2"* />
The idea is that HTML is allright for rendering, but It lacks some
behaviors. Therefore , instead of making up another markup, there is the
chance to decorate with wicket behaviors and validators.
This is flexible enough to have differents specifications and
implementation to rich HTML.
The idea we have at my work is to allow junior programmers to design
>>> mockup
pages for funcitonal analyst without adding a line of code. We were
>>> mocking
up pages with Adobe Flex and would like to have this behaviour with
>>> wicket.
thanks in advance
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: decorating html with wicket
Tom,
Something else. I experienced the advantages to have mock up pages
working in another company with Adobe Flex. These pages are added to the
analysis and the clients could have in advance a vivid experience.
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Fernando Wermus wrote:
> Tom,
> Thanks you for the review.
>
> The idea is that some pages are not implemented, tough they are declared
> by some one who do not know how to program. A page implemented by us read
> the form and instance all the components. We have wizards and they can
> show the mock up to third workers. When they are accepted, the programmers
> finish the work.
>
>
> Fernando Wermus.
>
> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Thomas Götz wrote:
>
>> I'm not convinced yet that this is really a good idea (how to deal with
>> constructor arguments for validators? What is the advantage of having all
>> in html effectively?) but as a starting point you could look at
>> AbstractMarkupFilter (e.g. see how WicketRemoveTagHandler and other
>> implementations work).
>>
>> To add your own MarkupFilter implementation, do the following:
>>
>>
>> public class MyMarkupFactory extends MarkupFactory {
>>
>>@Override
>>public MarkupParser newMarkupParser(MarkupResourceStream resource) {
>>final MarkupParser markupParser = super.newMarkupParser(resource);
>>markupParser.add(new MyMarkupFilter());
>>return markupParser;
>>}
>>
>> }
>>
>> and register MyMarkupFactory in your Application class:
>>
>> @Override
>> public void init() {
>>super.init();
>>getMarkupSettings().setMarkupFactory(new MyMarkupFactory());
>> }
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Tom
>>
>>
>>
>> On 28.05.2012, 21:25h Fernando Wermus wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> > I was wondering if there is some solution already done like this:
>> >
>> > > > wicket:fieldtype="java.lang.String"*
>> > *wicket:validators="com.mycompany.MyValidator1,
>> > com.mycompany.MyValidator2"* />
>> >
>> > The idea is that HTML is allright for rendering, but It lacks some
>> > behaviors. Therefore , instead of making up another markup, there is the
>> > chance to decorate with wicket behaviors and validators.
>> >
>> > This is flexible enough to have differents specifications and
>> > implementation to rich HTML.
>> >
>> > The idea we have at my work is to allow junior programmers to design
>> mockup
>> > pages for funcitonal analyst without adding a line of code. We were
>> mocking
>> > up pages with Adobe Flex and would like to have this behaviour with
>> wicket.
>> >
>> > thanks in advance
>> >
>> > Fernando Wermus.
>> >
>> > www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
Re: decorating html with wicket
Tom,
Thanks you for the review.
The idea is that some pages are not implemented, tough they are declared by
some one who do not know how to program. A page implemented by us read the
form and instance all the components. We have wizards and they can show
the mock up to third workers. When they are accepted, the programmers
finish the work.
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Thomas Götz wrote:
> I'm not convinced yet that this is really a good idea (how to deal with
> constructor arguments for validators? What is the advantage of having all
> in html effectively?) but as a starting point you could look at
> AbstractMarkupFilter (e.g. see how WicketRemoveTagHandler and other
> implementations work).
>
> To add your own MarkupFilter implementation, do the following:
>
>
> public class MyMarkupFactory extends MarkupFactory {
>
>@Override
>public MarkupParser newMarkupParser(MarkupResourceStream resource) {
>final MarkupParser markupParser = super.newMarkupParser(resource);
>markupParser.add(new MyMarkupFilter());
>return markupParser;
>}
>
> }
>
> and register MyMarkupFactory in your Application class:
>
> @Override
> public void init() {
>super.init();
>getMarkupSettings().setMarkupFactory(new MyMarkupFactory());
> }
>
>
> Cheers,
> -Tom
>
>
>
> On 28.05.2012, 21:25h Fernando Wermus wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I was wondering if there is some solution already done like this:
> >
> > > wicket:fieldtype="java.lang.String"*
> > *wicket:validators="com.mycompany.MyValidator1,
> > com.mycompany.MyValidator2"* />
> >
> > The idea is that HTML is allright for rendering, but It lacks some
> > behaviors. Therefore , instead of making up another markup, there is the
> > chance to decorate with wicket behaviors and validators.
> >
> > This is flexible enough to have differents specifications and
> > implementation to rich HTML.
> >
> > The idea we have at my work is to allow junior programmers to design
> mockup
> > pages for funcitonal analyst without adding a line of code. We were
> mocking
> > up pages with Adobe Flex and would like to have this behaviour with
> wicket.
> >
> > thanks in advance
> >
> > Fernando Wermus.
> >
> > www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: Handling ReplaceHandlerException on continueToOriginalDestination in wicket 1.5
Hi, Martin.
"First, sorry for any mistakes, but I am Brazilian and my English is not
very good." :-)
I need your help. I found exactly the same problems you, as follows:
*
// This page will be redirect to a page intercepting
public class Checkout extends WebPage {
User loggedInUser = session.getLoggedInUser();
if (loggedInUser == null) {
redirectToInterceptPage(new Login(params));
}
}
public class Login extends WebPage {
// Method should return true and display the Checkout page
if (!this.continueToOriginalDestination()) {
setResponsePage(ShowCatalog.class);
}
}
*
Results: The method does not return true and throws the exception
ReplaceHandlerException, not redirecting after login to the Checkout page. I
don't know how to deal it.
How did you solve this problem?
peakmop wrote
>
> To follow up, and to put this issue at rest, here's the explanation
> (thanks to the wicket authentication examples):
> The ReplaceHandlerException will get thrown if there is an active request
> handler on the stack to stop its execution and start executing the new
> request handler (usually RedirectRequestHandler) if the original request
> was for some bookmarkable page. The exception eventually will get
> intercepted in the request handler code and the new request handler will
> get executed, and the requested page will eventually be rendered. Since
> before WICKET-4269 addressed the return values of
> continueToOriginalDestination(), that method return values were used to
> determine whether a redirect to the default (usually home page) or a
> redirect to the requested page is to take place. I was catching an
> Exception in the login page which also intercepted the
> ReplaceHandlerException which prevented the replacement request handler
> from being successfully executed down the road. I didn't realize this
> until I attached a debugger to the authentication examples.
> Developers can correct me if I'm off in my explanation here.
>
> -Martin-
>
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Handling-ReplaceHandlerException-on-continueToOriginalDestination-in-wicket-1-5-tp4101981p4649528.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
continueToOriginalDestination throws exception ReplaceHandlerException in wicket 1.5
Estou utilizando páginas interceptadores. Comumente, estou redirecionando
para uma tela de login, caso o usuário não esteja logado no sistema. Após se
logar, o sistema deverá retornar para a página anterior. O método foi
implementado conforme documentação descrita do site da Apache Wicket
(https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/using-intercept-pages.html)
// This page will be redirect to a page intercepting
public class Checkout extends WebPage {
User loggedInUser = session.getLoggedInUser();
if (loggedInUser == null) {
redirectToInterceptPage(new Login(params));
}
}
public class Login extends WebPage {
// Method should return true and display the Checkout page
if (!this.continueToOriginalDestination()) {
setResponsePage(ShowCatalog.class);
}
}
Results: The method does not return true or false and throws the exception
ReplaceHandlerException, not redirecting after login to the Checkout page. I
don't know how to deal it. How can I solve this problem?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/continueToOriginalDestination-throws-exception-ReplaceHandlerException-in-wicket-1-5-tp4649529.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: onload event on img-tag
Thanks a lot. That works like a charm.
cheers
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do something like:
> img = new NonCachingImage(...);
> img.add(new AttributeModifier("onload", "yourStuffHere"));
> form.add(img);
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Pasithee Jupiter
> wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> >
> > How can i add the onload attribute to an image? or is it possible to
> > prevent wicket overwriting html attributes on the img-tag?
> >
> >
> > In my HTML I have a form, and inside the form an img and several input
> > fields and a button. Click on the button triggers an ajax request and
> > returns new form values and a new NonCachingImage. So my goal is to run
> > some javascript after the image is loaded means > onload="javascript:abc();">. How can I do that with wicket?
> >
> >
> > Thanks a lot
>
>
>
> --
> Martin Grigorov
> jWeekend
> Training, Consulting, Development
> http://jWeekend.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: decorating html with wicket
I'm not convinced yet that this is really a good idea (how to deal with
constructor arguments for validators? What is the advantage of having all in
html effectively?) but as a starting point you could look at
AbstractMarkupFilter (e.g. see how WicketRemoveTagHandler and other
implementations work).
To add your own MarkupFilter implementation, do the following:
public class MyMarkupFactory extends MarkupFactory {
@Override
public MarkupParser newMarkupParser(MarkupResourceStream resource) {
final MarkupParser markupParser = super.newMarkupParser(resource);
markupParser.add(new MyMarkupFilter());
return markupParser;
}
}
and register MyMarkupFactory in your Application class:
@Override
public void init() {
super.init();
getMarkupSettings().setMarkupFactory(new MyMarkupFactory());
}
Cheers,
-Tom
On 28.05.2012, 21:25h Fernando Wermus wrote:
> Hi all,
> I was wondering if there is some solution already done like this:
>
> wicket:fieldtype="java.lang.String"*
> *wicket:validators="com.mycompany.MyValidator1,
> com.mycompany.MyValidator2"* />
>
> The idea is that HTML is allright for rendering, but It lacks some
> behaviors. Therefore , instead of making up another markup, there is the
> chance to decorate with wicket behaviors and validators.
>
> This is flexible enough to have differents specifications and
> implementation to rich HTML.
>
> The idea we have at my work is to allow junior programmers to design mockup
> pages for funcitonal analyst without adding a line of code. We were mocking
> up pages with Adobe Flex and would like to have this behaviour with wicket.
>
> thanks in advance
>
> Fernando Wermus.
>
> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
