Hi,
As Vineet said there is a link in the migration page to a more
detailed page about how Ajax works in Wicket 6.
Since there is no script to decorate (because we don't use inline
attributes anymore but event registration) the old AjaxCallDecorator
is removed.
The new way is:
@Override
Thanks a lot.
2012/6/4 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
Hi,
As Vineet said there is a link in the migration page to a more
detailed page about how Ajax works in Wicket 6.
Since there is no script to decorate (because we don't use inline
attributes anymore but event registration) the
Hi,
we have to use PIE (see http://css3pie.com/ http://css3pie.com/ ) to make
IE7 and IE8 capable of rendering CSS3 decoration features. We use a shared
resource mount to have an absolute URL in our CSS file (see also
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3046
Hi,
You can use org.apache.wicket.request.UrlRenderer#renderRelativeUrl(Url)
to render relative url to your special resource.
As a parameter use org.apache.wicket.request.UrlRenderer#getBaseUrl()
which should return the current page's url.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Dirk Forchel
This is the seventh maintenance release of the Wicket 1.5.x series. This
release brings over 26 bug fixes and improvements.
Git tag:
release/wicket-1.5.7
Changelog:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310561version=12321241
Maven:
dependency
Hi Martin,
actually I don't get it. How should I use
org.apache.wicket.request.UrlRenderer within a CSS file?
At the moment I prepare a quickstart application for our problem. Maybe this
helps to get an impression how it should work.
--
View this message in context:
Load this .css file with (Package)TextTemplate and substitute a
placeholder for the url.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Dirk Forchel dirk.forc...@exedio.com wrote:
Hi Martin,
actually I don't get it. How should I use
org.apache.wicket.request.UrlRenderer within a CSS file?
At the moment I
No suggestions? Anyone?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Conditional-Popup-tp4649649p4649706.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe,
What about the AjaxLink alternative I already suggested?
-Tom
On 04.06.2012 at 09:35 hfriederichs wrote:
No suggestions? Anyone?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands,
Thomas Götz-2 wrote
As an alternative, you could use an AjaxLink and push the popup-opener JS
to teh frontend, then you could have your decision logic (wether to open
it or not) in the backend (Wicket layer).
But, how would you do that?
if (condition) {
info(Do this first);
}
On 04.06.2012 at 13:21 hfriederichs wrote:
Thomas Götz-2 wrote
As an alternative, you could use an AjaxLink and push the popup-opener JS
to teh frontend, then you could have your decision logic (wether to open
it or not) in the backend (Wicket layer).
But, how would you do that?
Yeah.. I was looking at both of those.
I was curious if anybody had any anecdotal or empirical evidence supporting
either approach.
The client is currently using a polling approach and I have some concerns about
wasted resources.
Also, the deadline is a little tight, so I'm not sure if I want
Is there a projected release date for wicket 1.6?
Just curious because I'm starting a new project and am trying to decide if I
should start it using 1.6.
Douglas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For
As soon as people start using it and send feedback ...
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Douglas Ferguson the...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a projected release date for wicket 1.6?
Just curious because I'm starting a new project and am trying to decide if I
should start it using 1.6.
Douglas
as soon as it will be released,people will start using it ;)
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
As soon as people start using it and send feedback ...
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Douglas Ferguson the...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a projected release
totally agree with Vineet here.
-D
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:59 AM, vineet semwal
vineetsemwal1...@gmail.com wrote:
as soon as it will be released,people will start using it ;)
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
As soon as people start using it and
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote:
totally agree with Vineet here.
The problem is that once we release the first Release Candidate it is
not possible (recommended) to make fixes in the APIs.
As far as I know there are no open tickets for bugs in Wicket
6.0.0-beta2
So is there any?
--
Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
Nino Martinez
What about this?
public class MyComponent extends Panel {
public MyComponent(String id) {
super(id);
setOutputMarkupId(true);
}
@Override
public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) {
response.renderOnDomReadyJavaScript(
$('# +
Thomas,
thanks for this hint, didn't know about that... So the script is executed every
time the
component is updated in an ajax call, correct? If so, it would surely solve
some of my
issues. For longer scripts, I would still prefer to have them in the markup
file (might be
different if we
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Jürgen Lind juergen.l...@iteratec.de wrote:
Thomas,
thanks for this hint, didn't know about that... So the script is executed
every time the
component is updated in an ajax call, correct? If so, it would surely solve
For every rerender of the component. That
Thanks Martin,
maybe I should have asked before trying to invent my own stuff... Anyway,
developing
a new wicket tag was some kind of fun as well...
J.
On 04.06.2012 21:10, Martin Grigorov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Jürgen Lindjuergen.l...@iteratec.de wrote:
Thomas,
thanks
… or you could put your Javascript code into a template, e.g. like that:
MyComponent.js.tmpl:
$('#${markupId} .ttr').tipTip({defaultPosition: 'right'});
// ... some long Javascript block ….
and in MyComponent.java you'd have:
---
public
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Jürgen Lind juergen.l...@iteratec.de wrote:
Thanks Martin,
maybe I should have asked before trying to invent my own stuff... Anyway,
developing
a new wicket tag was some kind of fun as well...
I'm glad you have fun but I highly recommend staying away from
Hello,
I have very, very little experience with portlet (and to be honest I am not
very keen in getting more ;) ).
And I have to surprise you - because I share your opinion about portlets
sand portals. But I noticed lately that corporations like to say that whey
offer portal for their clients and
Martin,
ok, I will think about going to one of the ideas Thomas suggested. I still like
the
idea that I have my javascript only in the markup file and nothing in the Java
class,
though...
Thanks again,
J.
On 04.06.2012 21:25, Martin Grigorov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Jürgen
26 matches
Mail list logo
