Spring MVC-like annotations

2013-06-22 Thread Andrea Del Bene
Hi, In a project I'm following at work we use Spring MCV and its annotations to build a REST service mapping the methods of a controller to a specific path: @Controller @RequestMapping("/users/"){ public MyController { @RequestMapping("/users/{userid}", method=RequestMethod.GET) public Stri

Re: Point Form action to Page

2013-06-22 Thread Paul Bors
Try the second approach. There would be no query parameters to worry about. You can construct your page by taking as a constructor parameter a POJO that's the model object for the filter form. You can also have a default constructor that would construct the page with no filters. ~ Thank you,

replacement of AnnotApplicationContextMock

2013-06-22 Thread Piratenvisier
What is the replacement for the Class AnnotApplicationContextMock ? Thanks Heiner - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: wiki down

2013-06-22 Thread Francois Meillet
Use https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET François Meillet Formation Wicket - Développement Wicket Le 22 juin 2013 à 15:06, Dieter Tremel a écrit : > Calling the wiki at https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/ results in >> Not Found >> >> The requested URL /WICKET/ was not found on

wiki down

2013-06-22 Thread Dieter Tremel
Calling the wiki at https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/ results in > Not Found > > The requested URL /WICKET/ was not found on this server. Is this known already? Thank You Dieter Tremel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...

Re: DataTable and unserializable data

2013-06-22 Thread Bas Gooren
Hi, Most wicket components use models and providers mainly so you can decide if the data should be serialized or not. You can control what kind of models are used, and how much data they serialize. If you use proper loadable & detachable models, then wicket will not serialize your Contact in

Re: A Wicket in Ruby

2013-06-22 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Mike Pence wrote: > Am I crazy? Yes, but that shouldn't stop you. While a straight java -> ruby conversion is possible, I doubt it will lead to a satisfying result. I'd rather do a Wicket "inspired" new development, which would lead to a better fit in the ruby la

Re: Javascript confirm with condition before submit

2013-06-22 Thread grignette
Thanks Marios ! I will test that Monday -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Javascript-confirm-with-condition-before-submit-tp4659672p4659695.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.