Re: Issue upgrading to Wicket6 from wicket 1.5.9

2013-10-14 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, Try to get thread dump of the Maven process. It may tell you what is hanging. In Unix like systems you can use: kill -3 mavenProcessId On any system you can use JDK's jps and jstack to get the dump as well. On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Rob Alesi rob.al...@appdirect.com wrote: Hey,

Re: getPage(pageReference) == null since Wicket 6.10.0

2013-10-14 Thread Dieter Tremel
Am 12.10.2013 21:58, schrieb Martin Grigorov: The problem is that most of us use Tomcat/Jetty and we don't test other web containers. Hi, I always saw the decision between full Java EE and Spring Framework, and Spring always made the impression to be a solution for all problems and you have to

Re: getPage(pageReference) == null since Wicket 6.10.0

2013-10-14 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Dieter Tremel tre...@tremel-computer.dewrote: Am 12.10.2013 21:58, schrieb Martin Grigorov: The problem is that most of us use Tomcat/Jetty and we don't test other web containers. Hi, I always saw the decision between full Java EE and Spring

Solution to DatePicket with IE 9 not showing up

2013-10-14 Thread Marcus Ludvigsson
Hi, I had a problem in Wicket6 with a datepicker that did not show up in IE9 and saw that more had that issue but I could not find any solution in the mail archives. Debugging the issue I saw that the problem was that Yahoo.Dom.get() in IE grabbed the value from the wicket:id attribute

Re: getPage(pageReference) == null since Wicket 6.10.0

2013-10-14 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Our current stack for big applications (10-20k concurrent users) is: - wicket 6 (we upgrade with every release, across all projects almost simultaneously, couple of million lines of code, about 3000 pages, 3000 panels, etc) - spring for wiring hibernate, cxf and classpath scans, and some DI -

unwanted DefaultPageManagerProvider

2013-10-14 Thread uwe schaefer
Hi we seem to face a little problem here with wicket 6.11: Application.class:708 setPageManagerProvider(new DefaultPageManagerProvider(this)); sets the default provider here. Lateron [during init()] we replace this one by using the snippet from HttpSessionDataStore's javadocs:

Re: unwanted DefaultPageManagerProvider

2013-10-14 Thread uwe schaefer
On 14.10.2013 21:10, uwe schaefer wrote: Now for the question: what is the suggested way to register a PageManagerProvider BEFORE anyone asks for it? PS: rather than an initializer being the culprit, could it also be a racecondition with clustering and public void sessionUnbound(final