Re: Implications of setRecreateBookmarkablePagesAfterExpiry()

2016-07-13 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi Ravi, Please test my suggested patch attached in the ticket. Thank you! Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > Sorry! > It is vacation season :) > I'll try to take a look

Re: Wicket Bootstrap 0.9.17 & 0.10.7 are released

2016-07-13 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Thanks! On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > Wicket Bootstrap 0.9.17 (built against Wicket 6.23.0) and 0.10.7 (built > against Wicket 7.3.0) have been released and soon will be available at > Maven Central! > > New components: > - Bootstrap

Wicket Bootstrap 0.9.17 & 0.10.7 are released

2016-07-13 Thread Martin Grigorov
Wicket Bootstrap 0.9.17 (built against Wicket 6.23.0) and 0.10.7 (built against Wicket 7.3.0) have been released and soon will be available at Maven Central! New components: - Bootstrap Markdown editor: http://wb-mgrigorov.rhcloud.com/markdown - Bootstrap Reting:

Re: Wicket @SpringBean - @Autowired properties not Initialized

2016-07-13 Thread mashleyttu
Okay, scratch this question. It's working. I was just looking at the Eclipse debugger and saw all the @Autowired fields were null. I failed to read this segment of the Javadoc: * A lazy init proxy waits until the first method invocation before it uses the * {@link IProxyTargetLocator} to

Re: Wicket @SpringBean - @Autowired properties not Initialized

2016-07-13 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, This should just work as you expect it to. I don't remember any problems related to this in 6.11. But if you can reproduce the problem with 6.23/7.3.0 in a quickstart app then please attach it to JIRA. Thanks! Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On

Wicket @SpringBean - @Autowired properties not Initialized

2016-07-13 Thread mashleyttu
Hi All, When we include a property on our Page class with the @SpringBean annotation it doesn't seem to initialized the @Autowired properties of the bean when using the GCLib Proxy. If we set wrapInProxy to false as follows, wicket skips the GCLib code and simply pulls the bean using Springs

Re: Add attribute to label tag in CheckBoxMultipleChoice component

2016-07-13 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, The only way I see is to override org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.CheckBoxMultipleChoice#appendOptionHtml() Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Alberto wrote: > > Hello, > in

Add attribute to label tag in CheckBoxMultipleChoice component

2016-07-13 Thread Alberto
Hello, in CheckBoxMultipleChoice component the method getAdditionalAttributes() is used to add an attribute to the input tag. Is there a simple way to do the same for the label tag? Or a way to add a new tag (e.g. ) inside label tag? getPrefix() and getSuffix() add content outside of label tag.

Re: Single Page Applications (SPA), Wicket and the history ajax back issue

2016-07-13 Thread Wayne W
Hi, On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi, > > It seems you use Wicket for several years now and you have no idea how to > use it! > Yes perhaps Martin, I do try but there's a lot too it. > > I have done this for a client of mine 4 years

Re: Single Page Applications (SPA), Wicket and the history ajax back issue

2016-07-13 Thread Wayne W
> So you don't use Ajax because of missing back button support? > We have a feature request for that, but it didn't spark much interest: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5290 Yes in a lot of cases unfortunately. It confuses a lot of non tech users who are used to using the

Re: Wicket 6 IRequestMapper customization for mount path which is not the first url segment

2016-07-13 Thread fatfennec
Hi Marin, Thanks for replying. I've checked the CryptoMapper and the concept of compound mapper. For the compound mapper, it is hard for me to validate my keywords which actually has no format(e.g. count, prefixes, wordings, length...etc). After further testing, I am going to use the