Re: ListenerRequestHandler / urls from the past... - component not found

2018-06-30 Thread Korbinian Bachl
Yeah - no;

the problem is here the amount of pages and the crawl-budget of a crawler per 
domain; 
If you waste 1000's of urls you get not indexed well enough and even penalized; 
I know this and we use canonical all over the places, but seo guys clearly 
showed that we need to get rid of this and if we cant we have at least to put 
it into a named parameter;

Beside, when I look into google webmaster myself I can clearly see these many 
component/ parameter combos make a real pain, so we need to get rid of these. 
While all our pages are already stateless we still have these in terms of AJAX 
and Forms.

Best

KB


- Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "Bas Gooren" 
> An: users@wicket.apache.org
> Gesendet: Samstag, 30. Juni 2018 21:06:00
> Betreff: Re: ListenerRequestHandler / urls from the past... - component not 
> found

> Hi!
> 
> Well that’s something you can fix by embedding a canonical url in your
> page. It tells search engines to ignore all other urls for that page,
> including the ones with wicket info in them.
> 
> // Bas
> 
> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone
> 
>> Op 30 jun. 2018 om 19:41 heeft Korbinian Bachl 
>> 
>> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>> Hi Sven,
>>
>> well, the problem here are our clever webbots - especially bing and even 
>> worse
>> google :)
>>
>> See, bingbot or googlebot index now e.g.:
>> (derived from wicket examples)
>>
>> www.domain.com/choice
>>
>> and a load of bullshit like
>>
>> choice?2-1.IBehaviorListener.0-form-makes
>> choice?2-1.IBehaviorListener.0-form-go
>> [add here sometimes 100's of further ajax links]
>>
>> that now lead to having indexed many many pages that nearly cant be taimed; 
>> Even
>> using robots.txt or their webmastertools makes this a nightmare as the
>> potential namings you can manually fix are in the hundreds or thousands;
>>
>> If all wicket things would be behind an parameter e.g:
>> ?wicketHandling=2-1.IBehaviorListener.0-form-makes
>> ?wicketHandling=2-1.IBehaviorListener.0-form-go
>>
>> you could just concentrate on that parameter and save literally many many 
>> hours
>> of work and seo complaints :)
>>
>> IMHO this was standard up to wicket 1.4 in a way that all those page and
>> component info was put to a certain wicket interface root path e.g:
>> ?wicket:interface=:0 and that allowed much easier taming of these 
>> problems
>> than its currently for me;
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> KB
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
>>> Von: "Sven Meier" 
>>> An: users@wicket.apache.org
>>> Gesendet: Samstag, 30. Juni 2018 13:37:06
>>> Betreff: Re: ListenerRequestHandler / urls from the past... - component not
>>> found
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
 http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm
>>>
>>> "0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm" *is* a parameter, it just doesn't
>>> have a value.
>>>
>>> How would renaming that parameter improve anything?
>>>
>>> Have fun
>>> Sven
>>>
>>>
 Am 30.06.2018 um 12:06 schrieb Korbinian Bachl:
 Thanks for the answer - that gives me the right direction. Say, do you 
 know if
 it would be possible to have the wicket component part not in the url like
 currently but using a named parameter? e.g.:

 http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm

 should instead be

 http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?wicketHandling=0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm

 where wicketHandling would be the global named paramter where the wicket 
 puts
 all its infos into that parameter and not just add it to the url?

 Best,

 KB



 - Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "Bas Gooren" 
> An: users@wicket.apache.org, "Korbinian Bachl" 
> 
> Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Juni 2018 12:06:39
> Betreff: Re: ListenerRequestHandler / urls from the past... - component 
> not
> found
> Hi!
>
> I think there are many ways to fix this, ranging from easy to complex.
>
> The easiest one: either catch it in a IRequestCycleListener (in
> onException), and “fix” the request handler by stripping the
> pageAndComponent info from it
> Next option: override wicket’s exception mapper (see
> DefaultExceptionMapper), and catch/fix it there.
>
> Since this is a common issue for you, I’d got with a request cycle 
> listener
> since it’s quite easy to plug in:
> - catch ComponentNotFoundException
> - check if the request handler is a ListenerInterfaceRequestHandler
> - return a BookmarkablePageRequestHandler or a RenderPageRequestHandler,
> depending on the type of page that was being rendered (stateless,
> bookmarkable)
>
> Good luck.
>
> Met vriendelijke groet,
> Kind regards,
>
> Bas Gooren
>
> Op 29 juni 2018 bij 11:50:27, Korbinian Bachl (
> korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de) schreef:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've got some problems with 404/ 500 error codes in my wic

Re: ListenerRequestHandler / urls from the past... - component not found

2018-06-30 Thread Bas Gooren
Hi!

Well that’s something you can fix by embedding a canonical url in your
page. It tells search engines to ignore all other urls for that page,
including the ones with wicket info in them.

// Bas

Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone

> Op 30 jun. 2018 om 19:41 heeft Korbinian Bachl 
>  het volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi Sven,
>
> well, the problem here are our clever webbots - especially bing and even 
> worse google :)
>
> See, bingbot or googlebot index now e.g.:
> (derived from wicket examples)
>
> www.domain.com/choice
>
> and a load of bullshit like
>
> choice?2-1.IBehaviorListener.0-form-makes
> choice?2-1.IBehaviorListener.0-form-go
> [add here sometimes 100's of further ajax links]
>
> that now lead to having indexed many many pages that nearly cant be taimed; 
> Even using robots.txt or their webmastertools makes this a nightmare as the 
> potential namings you can manually fix are in the hundreds or thousands;
>
> If all wicket things would be behind an parameter e.g:
> ?wicketHandling=2-1.IBehaviorListener.0-form-makes
> ?wicketHandling=2-1.IBehaviorListener.0-form-go
>
> you could just concentrate on that parameter and save literally many many 
> hours of work and seo complaints :)
>
> IMHO this was standard up to wicket 1.4 in a way that all those page and 
> component info was put to a certain wicket interface root path e.g:
> ?wicket:interface=:0 and that allowed much easier taming of these 
> problems than its currently for me;
>
> Best,
>
> KB
>
>
>
>
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
>> Von: "Sven Meier" 
>> An: users@wicket.apache.org
>> Gesendet: Samstag, 30. Juni 2018 13:37:06
>> Betreff: Re: ListenerRequestHandler / urls from the past... - component not 
>> found
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm
>>
>> "0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm" *is* a parameter, it just doesn't
>> have a value.
>>
>> How would renaming that parameter improve anything?
>>
>> Have fun
>> Sven
>>
>>
>>> Am 30.06.2018 um 12:06 schrieb Korbinian Bachl:
>>> Thanks for the answer - that gives me the right direction. Say, do you know 
>>> if
>>> it would be possible to have the wicket component part not in the url like
>>> currently but using a named parameter? e.g.:
>>>
>>> http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm
>>>
>>> should instead be
>>>
>>> http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?wicketHandling=0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm
>>>
>>> where wicketHandling would be the global named paramter where the wicket 
>>> puts
>>> all its infos into that parameter and not just add it to the url?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> KB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
 Von: "Bas Gooren" 
 An: users@wicket.apache.org, "Korbinian Bachl" 
 
 Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Juni 2018 12:06:39
 Betreff: Re: ListenerRequestHandler / urls from the past... - component not
 found
 Hi!

 I think there are many ways to fix this, ranging from easy to complex.

 The easiest one: either catch it in a IRequestCycleListener (in
 onException), and “fix” the request handler by stripping the
 pageAndComponent info from it
 Next option: override wicket’s exception mapper (see
 DefaultExceptionMapper), and catch/fix it there.

 Since this is a common issue for you, I’d got with a request cycle listener
 since it’s quite easy to plug in:
 - catch ComponentNotFoundException
 - check if the request handler is a ListenerInterfaceRequestHandler
 - return a BookmarkablePageRequestHandler or a RenderPageRequestHandler,
 depending on the type of page that was being rendered (stateless,
 bookmarkable)

 Good luck.

 Met vriendelijke groet,
 Kind regards,

 Bas Gooren

 Op 29 juni 2018 bij 11:50:27, Korbinian Bachl (
 korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de) schreef:

 Hi,

 I've got some problems with 404/ 500 error codes in my wicket app that
 happen to come from the past... Now, when wicket makes any url for a
 component this one gets added to the path, e.g.:
 http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm

 So when time goes by and the component name changes to e.g.: inputForm3 and
 one then calls the above URL wicket annoys with an 500 error...
 (attention: it is also related to the fact if there is an active session or
 there is not! - happy debugging !)

 reason:

 org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.ComponentNotFoundException:
 Component 'brix-tile-24:form' has been removed from page.
 at
 org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.ListenerRequestHandler.respond(ListenerRequestHandler.java:166)

 at
 org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle$HandlerExecutor.respond(RequestCycle.java:912)

 
 (error from my app - u get a bit different one from the wicket examples app
 if you manually cha

Re: ListenerRequestHandler / urls from the past... - component not found

2018-06-30 Thread Korbinian Bachl
Hi Sven,

well, the problem here are our clever webbots - especially bing and even worse 
google :)

See, bingbot or googlebot index now e.g.: 
(derived from wicket examples)

www.domain.com/choice

and a load of bullshit like 

choice?2-1.IBehaviorListener.0-form-makes
choice?2-1.IBehaviorListener.0-form-go
[add here sometimes 100's of further ajax links]

that now lead to having indexed many many pages that nearly cant be taimed; 
Even using robots.txt or their webmastertools makes this a nightmare as the 
potential namings you can manually fix are in the hundreds or thousands;

If all wicket things would be behind an parameter e.g: 
?wicketHandling=2-1.IBehaviorListener.0-form-makes
?wicketHandling=2-1.IBehaviorListener.0-form-go

you could just concentrate on that parameter and save literally many many hours 
of work and seo complaints :)

IMHO this was standard up to wicket 1.4 in a way that all those page and 
component info was put to a certain wicket interface root path e.g: 
?wicket:interface=:0 and that allowed much easier taming of these problems 
than its currently for me;

Best,

KB




- Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "Sven Meier" 
> An: users@wicket.apache.org
> Gesendet: Samstag, 30. Juni 2018 13:37:06
> Betreff: Re: ListenerRequestHandler / urls from the past... - component not 
> found

> Hi,
> 
> >http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm
> 
> "0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm" *is* a parameter, it just doesn't
> have a value.
> 
> How would renaming that parameter improve anything?
> 
> Have fun
> Sven
> 
> 
> Am 30.06.2018 um 12:06 schrieb Korbinian Bachl:
>> Thanks for the answer - that gives me the right direction. Say, do you know 
>> if
>> it would be possible to have the wicket component part not in the url like
>> currently but using a named parameter? e.g.:
>>
>> http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm
>>
>> should instead be
>>
>> http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?wicketHandling=0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm
>>
>> where wicketHandling would be the global named paramter where the wicket puts
>> all its infos into that parameter and not just add it to the url?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> KB
>>
>>
>>
>> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
>>> Von: "Bas Gooren" 
>>> An: users@wicket.apache.org, "Korbinian Bachl" 
>>> 
>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Juni 2018 12:06:39
>>> Betreff: Re: ListenerRequestHandler / urls from the past... - component not
>>> found
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I think there are many ways to fix this, ranging from easy to complex.
>>>
>>> The easiest one: either catch it in a IRequestCycleListener (in
>>> onException), and “fix” the request handler by stripping the
>>> pageAndComponent info from it
>>> Next option: override wicket’s exception mapper (see
>>> DefaultExceptionMapper), and catch/fix it there.
>>>
>>> Since this is a common issue for you, I’d got with a request cycle listener
>>> since it’s quite easy to plug in:
>>> - catch ComponentNotFoundException
>>> - check if the request handler is a ListenerInterfaceRequestHandler
>>> - return a BookmarkablePageRequestHandler or a RenderPageRequestHandler,
>>> depending on the type of page that was being rendered (stateless,
>>> bookmarkable)
>>>
>>> Good luck.
>>>
>>> Met vriendelijke groet,
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Bas Gooren
>>>
>>> Op 29 juni 2018 bij 11:50:27, Korbinian Bachl (
>>> korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de) schreef:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've got some problems with 404/ 500 error codes in my wicket app that
>>> happen to come from the past... Now, when wicket makes any url for a
>>> component this one gets added to the path, e.g.:
>>> http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm
>>>
>>> So when time goes by and the component name changes to e.g.: inputForm3 and
>>> one then calls the above URL wicket annoys with an 500 error...
>>> (attention: it is also related to the fact if there is an active session or
>>> there is not! - happy debugging !)
>>>
>>> reason:
>>>
>>> org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.ComponentNotFoundException:
>>> Component 'brix-tile-24:form' has been removed from page.
>>> at
>>> org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.ListenerRequestHandler.respond(ListenerRequestHandler.java:166)
>>>
>>> at
>>> org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle$HandlerExecutor.respond(RequestCycle.java:912)
>>>
>>> 
>>> (error from my app - u get a bit different one from the wicket examples app
>>> if you manually change the component info part - sometimes just an 404,
>>> sometimes 500)
>>>
>>>
>>> So, how can this be fixed that instead of giving us this 500er error in
>>> live systems that wicket should just ignore the problem? I mean failing in
>>> dev is OK but in deploy? So basically wicket shall treat it as
>>>
>>> http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/
>>>
>>> request;
>>>
>>>
>>> IMHO the problem here is in ListenerRequestHandler at 164:
>>>
>>> if ((component ==

Re: ListenerRequestHandler / urls from the past... - component not found

2018-06-30 Thread Sven Meier

Hi,

>http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm

"0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm" *is* a parameter, it just doesn't 
have a value.


How would renaming that parameter improve anything?

Have fun
Sven


Am 30.06.2018 um 12:06 schrieb Korbinian Bachl:

Thanks for the answer - that gives me the right direction. Say, do you know if 
it would be possible to have the wicket component part not in the url like 
currently but using a named parameter? e.g.:

http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm

should instead be

http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?wicketHandling=0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm

where wicketHandling would be the global named paramter where the wicket puts 
all its infos into that parameter and not just add it to the url?

Best,

KB



- Ursprüngliche Mail -

Von: "Bas Gooren" 
An: users@wicket.apache.org, "Korbinian Bachl" 
Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Juni 2018 12:06:39
Betreff: Re: ListenerRequestHandler / urls from the past... - component not 
found
Hi!

I think there are many ways to fix this, ranging from easy to complex.

The easiest one: either catch it in a IRequestCycleListener (in
onException), and “fix” the request handler by stripping the
pageAndComponent info from it
Next option: override wicket’s exception mapper (see
DefaultExceptionMapper), and catch/fix it there.

Since this is a common issue for you, I’d got with a request cycle listener
since it’s quite easy to plug in:
- catch ComponentNotFoundException
- check if the request handler is a ListenerInterfaceRequestHandler
- return a BookmarkablePageRequestHandler or a RenderPageRequestHandler,
depending on the type of page that was being rendered (stateless,
bookmarkable)

Good luck.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Kind regards,

Bas Gooren

Op 29 juni 2018 bij 11:50:27, Korbinian Bachl (
korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de) schreef:

Hi,

I've got some problems with 404/ 500 error codes in my wicket app that
happen to come from the past... Now, when wicket makes any url for a
component this one gets added to the path, e.g.:
http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm

So when time goes by and the component name changes to e.g.: inputForm3 and
one then calls the above URL wicket annoys with an 500 error...
(attention: it is also related to the fact if there is an active session or
there is not! - happy debugging !)

reason:

org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.ComponentNotFoundException:
Component 'brix-tile-24:form' has been removed from page.
at
org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.ListenerRequestHandler.respond(ListenerRequestHandler.java:166)

at
org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle$HandlerExecutor.respond(RequestCycle.java:912)


(error from my app - u get a bit different one from the wicket examples app
if you manually change the component info part - sometimes just an 404,
sometimes 500)


So, how can this be fixed that instead of giving us this 500er error in
live systems that wicket should just ignore the problem? I mean failing in
dev is OK but in deploy? So basically wicket shall treat it as

http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/

request;


IMHO the problem here is in ListenerRequestHandler at 164:

if ((component == null && !freshPage) || (component != null &&
component.getPage() != page))
{
throw new ComponentNotFoundException("Component '" + getComponentPath()
+ "' has been removed from page.");
}

so we know there is no component and then wicket goes berserk and throws
it... Problem arises with many URLs indexed anywhere on the web and
pointing to ones page as well as bookmarked pages from users - they have
the old component info in the paths and there is no way to remove that!


Best
KB

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: ListenerRequestHandler / urls from the past... - component not found

2018-06-30 Thread Korbinian Bachl
Thanks for the answer - that gives me the right direction. Say, do you know if 
it would be possible to have the wicket component part not in the url like 
currently but using a named parameter? e.g.:

http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm

should instead be 

http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?wicketHandling=0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm

where wicketHandling would be the global named paramter where the wicket puts 
all its infos into that parameter and not just add it to the url?

Best,

KB



- Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "Bas Gooren" 
> An: users@wicket.apache.org, "Korbinian Bachl" 
> 
> Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Juni 2018 12:06:39
> Betreff: Re: ListenerRequestHandler / urls from the past... - component not 
> found

> Hi!
> 
> I think there are many ways to fix this, ranging from easy to complex.
> 
> The easiest one: either catch it in a IRequestCycleListener (in
> onException), and “fix” the request handler by stripping the
> pageAndComponent info from it
> Next option: override wicket’s exception mapper (see
> DefaultExceptionMapper), and catch/fix it there.
> 
> Since this is a common issue for you, I’d got with a request cycle listener
> since it’s quite easy to plug in:
> - catch ComponentNotFoundException
> - check if the request handler is a ListenerInterfaceRequestHandler
> - return a BookmarkablePageRequestHandler or a RenderPageRequestHandler,
> depending on the type of page that was being rendered (stateless,
> bookmarkable)
> 
> Good luck.
> 
> Met vriendelijke groet,
> Kind regards,
> 
> Bas Gooren
> 
> Op 29 juni 2018 bij 11:50:27, Korbinian Bachl (
> korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de) schreef:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've got some problems with 404/ 500 error codes in my wicket app that
> happen to come from the past... Now, when wicket makes any url for a
> component this one gets added to the path, e.g.:
> http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm
> 
> So when time goes by and the component name changes to e.g.: inputForm3 and
> one then calls the above URL wicket annoys with an 500 error...
> (attention: it is also related to the fact if there is an active session or
> there is not! - happy debugging !)
> 
> reason:
> 
> org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.ComponentNotFoundException:
> Component 'brix-tile-24:form' has been removed from page.
> at
> org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.ListenerRequestHandler.respond(ListenerRequestHandler.java:166)
> 
> at
> org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle$HandlerExecutor.respond(RequestCycle.java:912)
> 
> 
> (error from my app - u get a bit different one from the wicket examples app
> if you manually change the component info part - sometimes just an 404,
> sometimes 500)
> 
> 
> So, how can this be fixed that instead of giving us this 500er error in
> live systems that wicket should just ignore the problem? I mean failing in
> dev is OK but in deploy? So basically wicket shall treat it as
> 
> http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/
> 
> request;
> 
> 
> IMHO the problem here is in ListenerRequestHandler at 164:
> 
> if ((component == null && !freshPage) || (component != null &&
> component.getPage() != page))
> {
> throw new ComponentNotFoundException("Component '" + getComponentPath()
> + "' has been removed from page.");
> }
> 
> so we know there is no component and then wicket goes berserk and throws
> it... Problem arises with many URLs indexed anywhere on the web and
> pointing to ones page as well as bookmarked pages from users - they have
> the old component info in the paths and there is no way to remove that!
> 
> 
> Best
> KB
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org