And thanks again for feedback and comments!
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:24 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just to follow up. This was neither a wicket error nor a chrome problem
> but some weird combination of non rolled back transaction + some
> transaction controlling filter on top of of wicket filter (that was somehow
> truncating response).
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 6:36 PM Maxim Solodovnik
> wrote:
>
>> Maybe non-minimized stacktrace can gave some more info?
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 22:35, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Bumping jQuery version to 3.4.0 provides same results (no minimized).
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 5:28 PM Maxim Solodovnik
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > non minified jquery and/or wicket.mode=DEVELOPMENT
>> > > May be it will shed some light on this issue ...
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 20:59, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
>> > > reier...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 4:36 PM Maxim Solodovnik <
>> solomax...@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Is it reproducible with non-minified (i.e. DEVELOPMENT) version?
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Do you mean jquery non minified jQuery?
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > WBR
>> > > Maxim aka solomax
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> --
> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro