Re: Why aren't setEnabled and setVisible model based?

2021-05-11 Thread Andrew Geery
You can use a behavior to set whether a component is visible or enabled based on a model. The wicketstuff-minis project has two behaviors that do just this: https://javadoc.io/doc/org.wicketstuff/wicketstuff-minis/latest/org/wicketstuff/minis/behavior/EnabledModelBehavior.html https://javadoc.io/

Re: Why aren't setEnabled and setVisible model based?

2021-05-11 Thread Martijn Dashorst
The primary reason for not using IModel's as control mechanisms for visibility and enabling of components is memory usage. Wicket applications can have millions of Component instances at any given time in runtime memory, and adding 2 references plus the overhead of the IModel objects would be quite