Re: Wicket 1.5 and Tomcat 7 encoding issues?
Maybe this in application startup? getMarkupSettings().setDefaultMarkupEncoding(UTF-8); Antoine On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:13 AM, nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote: A screen shot? it's the text that should have shown this: IT support vest æ ø å http://www.imageupload.org/?d=4D92CA9C1 2011/3/29 Attila Király kiralyattila...@gmail.com: Could you provide a small example showing the problem? Attila 2011/3/29 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com Yeah I think so, the file encoding are utf-8 Although this are in the header : !-- DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd; -- !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd; html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en lang=en xmlns:wicket= http://wicket.apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.4-strict.dtd; We had the meta tag aswell for utf-8 but it made no difference.. Is there something else that I am missing? 2011/3/29 Attila Király kiralyattila...@gmail.com: Yep I ment that and it looks ok. Is your html page in UTF-8 as well? Attila 2011/3/29 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com you mean like this: Connector port=8080 protocol=HTTP/1.1 connectionTimeout=2 redirectPort=8443 URIEncoding=UTF-8 / Already done so.. Or? Thanks for helping.. 2011/3/29 Attila Király kiralyattila...@gmail.com: If this encoding issue is in url: did you configure Tomcat to use UTF-8 for uri encoding (URIEncoding attribute on the HTTP connector)? The default encoding for URI is ISO-8859-1 in Tomcat and UTF-8 in Jetty. Attila 2011/3/29 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com Hi Guys Im not sure if this is a wicket issue (I don't think so). But we are experiencing encoding(æøå) issues with Tomcat 7.0.11 after using Apache Wicket 1.5-rc2. However this issue does not occur when running Jetty.. Anyone has an idea on howto fix this? regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: shift / ctrl / alt keys + ajax
Thanks! I'll look into it this weekend and get back here. Preferably I'd like a solution without forms, but this approach is certainly better than hacking into the wicket-ajax call. Antoine On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Richard Nichols r...@visural.com wrote: You can do this on the client side relatively easily. Just bind a javascript event handler to the onkeydown event in the browser. When these key(s) are depressed change a form input to indicate which keys are pressed. When your Ajax event submits, you can check the model of the component the input is bound to to determine if the key(s) were pressed. cheers, Richard. On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.comwrote: Hi, when clicking an (ajax)link, or a checkbox, etc, on the server side I'd like to know whether the shift, ctrl or alt keys are pressed at the same time. So I figure I need to fetch via JavaScript and adapt the ajax call with some extra parameters. Any thoughts how to do that in a nice clean way in 1.5 without too much hacking involved? regards, Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Richard Nichols http://www.richardnichols.net/ :: http://onmydoorstep.com.au/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: preferred php framework by wicketeers...
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Frank van Lankvelt f.vanlankv...@onehippo.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com wrote: Since you can't always have what you want.. Is there any PHP framework out there which comes even close to Wicket; component based, strict separation between HTML and programming, stateful, out-of-the-box Ajax support, event handling, URL mapping, excellent testing features, and great community support? it would probably have turned up in your google search if it existed ;-) A prototype is easy to make though; you should get a lot of benefits already from adopting the wicket session mgmt, component rendering model to php. In fact, I built something like this for fun some time ago. No ajax, url mapping, models, other fancy stuff. But event handling and markup/code separation is pretty easy to accomplish. You'ld probably want to use smarty for the rendering though. It doesn't make a lot of sense to parse html on each request and smarty probably has the best tooling for php templating. cheers, Frank Thanks all for your answers and ideas. Let me summarize by: nothing comes close to Wicket in the PHP world, except for some individual features. Perhaps in other languages there's something better, but not in PHP. Excellent :) Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
shift / ctrl / alt keys + ajax
Hi, when clicking an (ajax)link, or a checkbox, etc, on the server side I'd like to know whether the shift, ctrl or alt keys are pressed at the same time. So I figure I need to fetch via JavaScript and adapt the ajax call with some extra parameters. Any thoughts how to do that in a nice clean way in 1.5 without too much hacking involved? regards, Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?)
*bump* I'm one of those people who is reading :-) Antoine On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Per p...@hamburg.de wrote: Hi, I am measuring it in a profiler after the request has been completed, but thanks for the hint. In case anyone else is reading, I have been playing with the onComponentTag() and onComponentTagBody() methods on the weekend, and I've been able to reduce my page sizes significantly. Admittedly, this comes at the expense of flexibility and beauty, but I'm only doing this in the inner loops of very few pages, so who cares :-) Will write a summary with a couple of hints once I stop drowning in work. Cheers, Per Reading in the other thread that a session size of 100K or less is achievable, I'll admit defeat now: I have not been able to shrink some of my pages(!) to less than 200K, not to mention the sessions. Despite LDMs, CompoundPropertyModels, and no, there are no domain objects in there, and no finals. How are you measuring this? Keep in mind that if you calculate when a request is still processing, you might still be measuring temporary data (e.g. for LoadableDetachableModel, you would also measure the transientModelObject, and same for any proxies (Spring/ Guice) you might use. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3316743i=0 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3316743i=1 If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3316743.html To unsubscribe from Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?), click here http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=3308014code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3317403.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?)
Hi Per, easy to read, good advice... Even the easiest stuff made me wonder whether I did that right... Excellent to see all these tips together. Thanks a bunch! Antoine On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Per p...@hamburg.de wrote: Hi Antoine, I have started collecting my hints over here: http://www.small-improvements.com/blog/technical/tuning-wicket-session-size Please note that much of it may be considered hacks and bad practice (I am just a Wicket user, not a Wicket master). There may be better ways to achieve the same results. I'd love to get feedback on these suggestions! So give it a shot and tell me how you went! Good luck! Per *bump* I'm one of those people who is reading :-) Antoine On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Per [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=0 wrote: Hi, I am measuring it in a profiler after the request has been completed, but thanks for the hint. In case anyone else is reading, I have been playing with the onComponentTag() and onComponentTagBody() methods on the weekend, and I've been able to reduce my page sizes significantly. Admittedly, this comes at the expense of flexibility and beauty, but I'm only doing this in the inner loops of very few pages, so who cares :-) Will write a summary with a couple of hints once I stop drowning in work. Cheers, Per Reading in the other thread that a session size of 100K or less is achievable, I'll admit defeat now: I have not been able to shrink some of my pages(!) to less than 200K, not to mention the sessions. Despite LDMs, CompoundPropertyModels, and no, there are no domain objects in there, and no finals. How are you measuring this? Keep in mind that if you calculate when a request is still processing, you might still be measuring temporary data (e.g. for LoadableDetachableModel, you would also measure the transientModelObject, and same for any proxies (Spring/ Guice) you might use. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3316743i=0 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3316743i=1 If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3316743.html http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3316743.html?by-user=t To unsubscribe from Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?), click here http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=3308014code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=3308014code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0by-user=t. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3317403.html http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3317403.html?by-user=t Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=1 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=2 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=3 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=4 If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3330006.html To unsubscribe from Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?), click here http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=3308014code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0. -- View this message in context:
Re: EXception handling in Wicket
I think you should prevent that SQLException from happening in the first place by validating the form input. Then use a FeedbackPanel to display suitable error messages. Just google for example code with forms, it's basic stuff. Otherwise, create a FeedbackPanel on your page, put a try .. catch block around your sql methods and in case of an exception, write to the FeedbackPanel using error(your message) Antoine On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:02 PM, arunarapole arunakumm...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for replay i am very glad you have sent me the sample code thank you so much My problem is i have to handle SQLException and only message to be display in hidden field same webpage do u have any idea regarding this Aruna On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Nitnatsnok [via Apache Wicket] ml-node+2340562-650873628-136...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b2340562-650873628-136...@n4.nabble.com ml-node%2b2340562-650873628-136...@n4.nabble.comml-node%252b2340562-650873628-136...@n4.nabble.com wrote: Oh, also I set not to show Error Page on exception in WebApplication: getExceptionSettings().setUnexpectedExceptionDisplay(IExceptionSettings.SHOW_NO_EXCEPTION_PAGE); -- View message @ http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/EXception-handling-in-Wicket-tp2340439p2340562.html To unsubscribe from EXception handling in Wicket, click here http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/TplServlet.jtp?tpl=unsubscribe_by_codenode=2340439code=YXJ1bmFrdW1tYXJpQGdtYWlsLmNvbXwyMzQwNDM5fC00Njg4NjYxODg= . -- Regards Aruna.R 404-988-5562 -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/EXception-handling-in-Wicket-tp2340439p2341035.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [1.5] new wicket URL-related questions
Q2: (a little n00b question) how can I find out which component makes my page stateful? Check the wicket-devutils and StatelessChecker. It allows you to use an annotation to validate the component is really stateless. Antoine
Re: Correct way of setting charset
Maybe this is what you need, in your WebApplication's init method :
getMarkupSettings().setDefaultMarkupEncoding(UTF-8);
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Sigmar Muuga meedi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
what is the correct way of setting my pages charset?
I did something like this and it didnt have any effect:
@Override
protected void configureResponse() {
super.configureResponse();
final String encoding = text/ + getMarkupType() + ; charset=UTF-8;
getResponse().setContentType(encoding);
}
I want to set everything in UTF-8.
Also, when I did something like this(like it is said in docs, I got error:
final String encoding = text/ + getMarkupType() + ; charset= +
CharSetUtil.getEncoding(getRequestCycle());
getResponse().setContentType(encoding);
And the error:
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 4, Size: 0
at java.util.ArrayList.add(ArrayList.java:367)
at
org.apache.wicket.extensions.util.encoding.CharSetMap.init(CharSetMap.java:238)
at
org.apache.wicket.extensions.util.encoding.CharSetUtil.initialize(CharSetUtil.java:72)
at
org.apache.wicket.extensions.util.encoding.CharSetUtil.getEncoding(CharSetUtil.java:102)
Sigmar
Re: MarkupComponentBorder and deprecation
hmm, interesting, that would be nice-to-have. now it would be even better if inside this behavior one could add other markup just like labels which i is not possible with a MarkupComponentBorder. is that somehow doable? Antoine On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote: no, you cant attach markup to behavior but you can create an equivalent of MarkupComponentBorder using a behavior. -igor On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com wrote: Hi, quick question: since IComponentBorder and Component.setComponentBorder are deprecated, how should I use MarkupComponentBorder - or shouldn't I use that at all? You can't attach a markup file to a behavior, right? Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
MarkupComponentBorder and deprecation
Hi, quick question: since IComponentBorder and Component.setComponentBorder are deprecated, how should I use MarkupComponentBorder - or shouldn't I use that at all? You can't attach a markup file to a behavior, right? Antoine
attaching a border to a component instead of vice versa - how?
Hi, is it possible to somehow attach a border to a component? I.e. currently afaik you have to do this in markup when using a border: div wicket:id=border span wicket:id=component/ /div and in the code something like: add(new Border(border) .add(new Component(component)) Instead I'd just want to specify span wicket:id=component/ and in the code add(new Component(component).add(new Border()); Since I want to specify markup in a separate file, behaviors don't cut it; and MarkupComponentBorder cannot handle any wicket components inside its markup, so that's not an option either. Any thoughts? Antoine
Re: Caching components
Maybe this will get you started http://twenty-six-wicket-tricks.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/twenty-six-wicket-tricks/src/main/java/com/locke/library/web/panels/caching/CachingPanel.java After reading Jeremy's reply I think this code suffers some thread-safeness issues though. Antoine On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, zkn z...@abv.bg wrote: Thanks Martin! If possible can you please give a hint how to use behavior to cache the rendered HTML for a component? On 24.03.2010, at 10:26, Martin Sachs wrote: hi, we need caching of components, since the construction of huge hierarchies is not cheap. The rendering ist fast. We cache the rendered HTML of a hole component via a beheaviour and write them on the next requests into a Label (unescaped). So instead of creating the complete hierarchie on every request, we create a much smaller one. But you must check, that the cachable components are stateless. Also we have JQuery for client-effects in this components, this would also be cached. The performance is much better with that: approx. 10-50 times better: 100ms with cache (the response time is not much depending on count of users) vs 1500 ms without cache depending how many parallel users. in near feature i will announce the site officially here. Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Avoiding wickety URLs in login form
3. I tried setting up the CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy. This successfully managed to encrypt the resulting wicket specific URL to ?x=a325u0234usdajfasdf, but the thing is, the login page now started expiring again. The reason is that CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy uses a key stored in the session, which has the effect of making all stateless links stateful again. According to the javadoc of CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy you can set an ICryptFactory using an application-based key rather than a session-based key. This should solve the looks of your url while keeping the session stateless. However as the javadoc also mentions this leaves the application open to CSRF attacks. Antoine
Re: Trailing / on parameter name/value pairs
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote: all servlet containers do that on first request. if you dont care about browsers with cookies disabled you can tweak tomcat to never append jsessionid to the url, afair there is a setting for that. -igor I wish I didn't have to care for browsers with cookies disabled but there's always some idiot who's preaching to the uninformed that 'cookies are a security risk' which is bollocks if you ask me. Having jsessionid's appended to your url can be a security risk... Besides, it looks ugly and you don't want search engines to end up displaying url's with jsessionid's in them. Furthermore if people don't like cookies they can also have them deleted after they close the browser, at least there's an option for that in Firefox. So I wouldn't worry about your preaching idiot and his uninformed followers ;-) Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Bookmarkable Links Session
When you have a stateless page, no session is created when you land on such a page first, or to be more precise: a temporary session is created. So that should explain the difference you see. Calling Session.get().bind() when logging in should fix that. Better, call Session.get().replaceSession() when logging in, that should both solve your problem and fix a potential security hole. Antoine On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Mauro Ciancio maurocian...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I'm developing an application that uses a lot of bookmarkable links in order to get pretty urls. When I log in with my userpassword, I'm redirected to the home page. This behavior is ok, but the session appears to be not created, so i still see the login link (and not the welcome message 'you are logged in'). However, if before login I browse a page that contains state and then i go to the login page, it works well. I guess the session is not being created, but it should be created when I try to login. Any ideas? Cheers. -- Mauro Ciancio maurociancio at gmail dot com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: jquery/qtip integration troubles - ajax post stopped
Alright, I got this to work in a clean way.
The problem was that the QTip jQuery plugin *cloned* the panel / form.
This was causing trouble for the form submission. Simply adding a
.remove() which removed the original DOM tree fixed the issue.
I ended up with replacing
.append( content: $('# + contentMarkupId + ').html(),)
by
.append( content: $('# + contentMarkupId + ').remove(),)
and now everything works as a charm.
Antoine.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Antoine van Wel
antoine.van@gmail.com wrote:
Turns out Wicket.$$(this) returned false after all. Thanks Richard!
I ended up adapting the AjaxButton by simply kicking out the
Wicket.$$(this) of the pre-condition check.
So can anybody tell me what this Wicket.$$(this) is good for ... I
got a gut-feeling what I've done is not such a good idea :-)
Antoine
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Antoine van Wel
antoine.van@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the reply. It didn't bring me further though.
When debugging, Wicket.$$(this) and the other one both return true, so
that doesn't seem to be the problem.
When tracking the evaluation of the precondition, I end up in wicket-event.js
25 if (Function.prototype.bind == null) {
26 Function.prototype.bind = function(object) {
27 var __method = this;
28 return function() {
29 return __method.apply(object, arguments);
30 }
31 }
32}
where line 29 will return false.
Does that ring any bells?
By the way, in the code I copied-and-pasted in my previous email, two
lines were not included which needs to be there:
setOutputMarkupId(true) on parent content components.
Antoine
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Richard Wilkinson
richardjohnwilkin...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
'Ajax POST stopped because of precondition check' is probably your
problem. all wicket ajax can have a precondition, which is basically
a function that returns true or false, and will only execute the ajax
if it returns true. I expect that for some reason in your case this
function is returning false.
for an AjaxButton (well AjaxFormSubmitBehavior) the precondition is
this: return Wicket.$$(this)Wicket.$$(' + getForm().getMarkupId()
+ ');
in the wicket ajax javascript file i see this:
// returns if the element belongs to current document
// if the argument is not element, function returns true
Wicket.$$ = function(element) {
...
}
This must be failing for you, which I presume has something to do with
how you are passing the content into the qtip;
content: $('# + contentMarkupId + ').html()
Hope that helps.
--
Regards - Richard Wilkinson
Developer,
jWeekend: OO Java Technologies - Development and Training
http://jWeekend.com
On 9 March 2010 13:05, Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
Integrating a Jquery tooltip (qtip) went smoothly until I tried to do
an Ajax form submit.
The Wicket Ajax Debug panel shows an Ajax POST stopped because of
precondition check, so an Ajax response is never sent.
What I'm doing is simply render the text for the tooltip on the same
page in a hidden div, then pointing the content of the tooltip to that
div.
the html:
wicket:head
script type=text/javascript
src=/js/jquery-1.3.2.min.js/script
script type=text/javascript
src=/js/jquery.qtip-1.0.0-rc3.min.js/script
/wicket:head
wicket:extend
div wicket:id=content style=display: none;
form wicket:id=form
input type=submit wicket:id=clickme
value=click me
/form
/div
span wicket:id=tipmehover over me/span
/wicket:extend
the page class:
public class JQueryTestPage extends BasePage {
public JQueryTestPage() {
WebMarkupContainer content = new
WebMarkupContainer(content);
add(content);
FormVoid form = new FormVoid(form);
content.add(form);
form.add(new AjaxButton(clickme) {
�...@override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target,
Form? form) {
System.out.println(testing);
}
});
WebMarkupContainer qtip = new WebMarkupContainer(tipme);
add(qtip);
qtip.add(new QTipBehavior(qtip, content));
}
}
and finally the QTipBehavior:
public class QTipBehavior extends AbstractBehavior {
private String componentMarkupId;
private String contentMarkupId;
public QTipBehavior(Component parent, Component content) {
contentMarkupId = content.getMarkupId();
componentMarkupId = parent.getMarkupId();
}
�...@override
public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) {
String javascript = new StringBuilder()
.append($(function
Re: jquery/qtip integration troubles - ajax post stopped
Turns out Wicket.$$(this) returned false after all. Thanks Richard!
I ended up adapting the AjaxButton by simply kicking out the
Wicket.$$(this) of the pre-condition check.
So can anybody tell me what this Wicket.$$(this) is good for ... I
got a gut-feeling what I've done is not such a good idea :-)
Antoine
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Antoine van Wel
antoine.van@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the reply. It didn't bring me further though.
When debugging, Wicket.$$(this) and the other one both return true, so
that doesn't seem to be the problem.
When tracking the evaluation of the precondition, I end up in wicket-event.js
25 if (Function.prototype.bind == null) {
26 Function.prototype.bind = function(object) {
27 var __method = this;
28 return function() {
29 return __method.apply(object, arguments);
30 }
31 }
32}
where line 29 will return false.
Does that ring any bells?
By the way, in the code I copied-and-pasted in my previous email, two
lines were not included which needs to be there:
setOutputMarkupId(true) on parent content components.
Antoine
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Richard Wilkinson
richardjohnwilkin...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
'Ajax POST stopped because of precondition check' is probably your
problem. all wicket ajax can have a precondition, which is basically
a function that returns true or false, and will only execute the ajax
if it returns true. I expect that for some reason in your case this
function is returning false.
for an AjaxButton (well AjaxFormSubmitBehavior) the precondition is
this: return Wicket.$$(this)Wicket.$$(' + getForm().getMarkupId()
+ ');
in the wicket ajax javascript file i see this:
// returns if the element belongs to current document
// if the argument is not element, function returns true
Wicket.$$ = function(element) {
...
}
This must be failing for you, which I presume has something to do with
how you are passing the content into the qtip;
content: $('# + contentMarkupId + ').html()
Hope that helps.
--
Regards - Richard Wilkinson
Developer,
jWeekend: OO Java Technologies - Development and Training
http://jWeekend.com
On 9 March 2010 13:05, Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
Integrating a Jquery tooltip (qtip) went smoothly until I tried to do
an Ajax form submit.
The Wicket Ajax Debug panel shows an Ajax POST stopped because of
precondition check, so an Ajax response is never sent.
What I'm doing is simply render the text for the tooltip on the same
page in a hidden div, then pointing the content of the tooltip to that
div.
the html:
wicket:head
script type=text/javascript
src=/js/jquery-1.3.2.min.js/script
script type=text/javascript
src=/js/jquery.qtip-1.0.0-rc3.min.js/script
/wicket:head
wicket:extend
div wicket:id=content style=display: none;
form wicket:id=form
input type=submit wicket:id=clickme
value=click me
/form
/div
span wicket:id=tipmehover over me/span
/wicket:extend
the page class:
public class JQueryTestPage extends BasePage {
public JQueryTestPage() {
WebMarkupContainer content = new
WebMarkupContainer(content);
add(content);
FormVoid form = new FormVoid(form);
content.add(form);
form.add(new AjaxButton(clickme) {
�...@override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target,
Form? form) {
System.out.println(testing);
}
});
WebMarkupContainer qtip = new WebMarkupContainer(tipme);
add(qtip);
qtip.add(new QTipBehavior(qtip, content));
}
}
and finally the QTipBehavior:
public class QTipBehavior extends AbstractBehavior {
private String componentMarkupId;
private String contentMarkupId;
public QTipBehavior(Component parent, Component content) {
contentMarkupId = content.getMarkupId();
componentMarkupId = parent.getMarkupId();
}
�...@override
public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) {
String javascript = new StringBuilder()
.append($(function() {)
.append( $('# + componentMarkupId +
').qtip({)
.append( content: $('# +
contentMarkupId + ').html(),)
.append( hide: { fixed: true },)
.append( position: { corner: {
target: 'topRight', tooltip:
'leftTop' } },)
.append( }))
.append(});)
.toString();
response.renderOnDomReadyJavascript(javascript);
}
}
All
jquery/qtip integration troubles - ajax post stopped
Hi everybody,
Integrating a Jquery tooltip (qtip) went smoothly until I tried to do
an Ajax form submit.
The Wicket Ajax Debug panel shows an Ajax POST stopped because of
precondition check, so an Ajax response is never sent.
What I'm doing is simply render the text for the tooltip on the same
page in a hidden div, then pointing the content of the tooltip to that
div.
the html:
wicket:head
script type=text/javascript src=/js/jquery-1.3.2.min.js/script
script type=text/javascript
src=/js/jquery.qtip-1.0.0-rc3.min.js/script
/wicket:head
wicket:extend
div wicket:id=content style=display: none;
form wicket:id=form
input type=submit wicket:id=clickme value=click
me
/form
/div
span wicket:id=tipmehover over me/span
/wicket:extend
the page class:
public class JQueryTestPage extends BasePage {
public JQueryTestPage() {
WebMarkupContainer content = new WebMarkupContainer(content);
add(content);
FormVoid form = new FormVoid(form);
content.add(form);
form.add(new AjaxButton(clickme) {
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target,
Form? form) {
System.out.println(testing);
}
});
WebMarkupContainer qtip = new WebMarkupContainer(tipme);
add(qtip);
qtip.add(new QTipBehavior(qtip, content));
}
}
and finally the QTipBehavior:
public class QTipBehavior extends AbstractBehavior {
private String componentMarkupId;
private String contentMarkupId;
public QTipBehavior(Component parent, Component content) {
contentMarkupId = content.getMarkupId();
componentMarkupId = parent.getMarkupId();
}
@Override
public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) {
String javascript = new StringBuilder()
.append($(function() {)
.append( $('# + componentMarkupId + ').qtip({)
.append( content: $('# +
contentMarkupId + ').html(),)
.append( hide: { fixed: true },)
.append( position: { corner: { target:
'topRight', tooltip:
'leftTop' } },)
.append( }))
.append(});)
.toString();
response.renderOnDomReadyJavascript(javascript);
}
}
All pretty straightforward.
So my guess is somehow Wicket is not happy about the redirection I
created by not using the rendered button directly.
I've been trying to debug this using Firebug, obviously without success.
Does anybody have any hints how to solve this? Is the approach I'm
taking flawed? Maybe jWicket or wiQuery could help here?
Antoine
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: jquery/qtip integration troubles - ajax post stopped
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the reply. It didn't bring me further though.
When debugging, Wicket.$$(this) and the other one both return true, so
that doesn't seem to be the problem.
When tracking the evaluation of the precondition, I end up in wicket-event.js
25 if (Function.prototype.bind == null) {
26 Function.prototype.bind = function(object) {
27 var __method = this;
28 return function() {
29 return __method.apply(object, arguments);
30 }
31 }
32}
where line 29 will return false.
Does that ring any bells?
By the way, in the code I copied-and-pasted in my previous email, two
lines were not included which needs to be there:
setOutputMarkupId(true) on parent content components.
Antoine
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Richard Wilkinson
richardjohnwilkin...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
'Ajax POST stopped because of precondition check' is probably your
problem. all wicket ajax can have a precondition, which is basically
a function that returns true or false, and will only execute the ajax
if it returns true. I expect that for some reason in your case this
function is returning false.
for an AjaxButton (well AjaxFormSubmitBehavior) the precondition is
this: return Wicket.$$(this)Wicket.$$(' + getForm().getMarkupId()
+ ');
in the wicket ajax javascript file i see this:
// returns if the element belongs to current document
// if the argument is not element, function returns true
Wicket.$$ = function(element) {
...
}
This must be failing for you, which I presume has something to do with
how you are passing the content into the qtip;
content: $('# + contentMarkupId + ').html()
Hope that helps.
--
Regards - Richard Wilkinson
Developer,
jWeekend: OO Java Technologies - Development and Training
http://jWeekend.com
On 9 March 2010 13:05, Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
Integrating a Jquery tooltip (qtip) went smoothly until I tried to do
an Ajax form submit.
The Wicket Ajax Debug panel shows an Ajax POST stopped because of
precondition check, so an Ajax response is never sent.
What I'm doing is simply render the text for the tooltip on the same
page in a hidden div, then pointing the content of the tooltip to that
div.
the html:
wicket:head
script type=text/javascript src=/js/jquery-1.3.2.min.js/script
script type=text/javascript
src=/js/jquery.qtip-1.0.0-rc3.min.js/script
/wicket:head
wicket:extend
div wicket:id=content style=display: none;
form wicket:id=form
input type=submit wicket:id=clickme value=click
me
/form
/div
span wicket:id=tipmehover over me/span
/wicket:extend
the page class:
public class JQueryTestPage extends BasePage {
public JQueryTestPage() {
WebMarkupContainer content = new
WebMarkupContainer(content);
add(content);
FormVoid form = new FormVoid(form);
content.add(form);
form.add(new AjaxButton(clickme) {
�...@override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target,
Form? form) {
System.out.println(testing);
}
});
WebMarkupContainer qtip = new WebMarkupContainer(tipme);
add(qtip);
qtip.add(new QTipBehavior(qtip, content));
}
}
and finally the QTipBehavior:
public class QTipBehavior extends AbstractBehavior {
private String componentMarkupId;
private String contentMarkupId;
public QTipBehavior(Component parent, Component content) {
contentMarkupId = content.getMarkupId();
componentMarkupId = parent.getMarkupId();
}
�...@override
public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) {
String javascript = new StringBuilder()
.append($(function() {)
.append( $('# + componentMarkupId +
').qtip({)
.append( content: $('# +
contentMarkupId + ').html(),)
.append( hide: { fixed: true },)
.append( position: { corner: { target:
'topRight', tooltip:
'leftTop' } },)
.append( }))
.append(});)
.toString();
response.renderOnDomReadyJavascript(javascript);
}
}
All pretty straightforward.
So my guess is somehow Wicket is not happy about the redirection I
created by not using the rendered button directly.
I've been trying to debug this using Firebug, obviously without success.
Does anybody have any hints how to solve this? Is the approach I'm
taking flawed? Maybe jWicket or wiQuery could help here?
Antoine
Re: How to encrypt/obfuscate resource reference?
A flag has been introduced that when set will throw an error when an fqn would be used. It will be in 1.4.7, which is currently in the voting phase, so it will be available within a week. But this would mean you'd have to alias all the classes anyway. Antoine On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Sergey Olefir solf.li...@gmail.com wrote: Thing is, I already toyed with WebRequestCodingStrategy -- specifically I changed how resources are encoded by replacing URL path with URL parameter. And I broke CSS/relative references in the process as I found out much later :) (as you found out already in your another post ;)) Although if I do something less drastic -- such as simply encoding the section with FQN -- I might break less stuff... Ah well, as you pointed out (and special thanks for that :)), 1.4.7 hopefully will be out soon with the some fix for the issue, maybe I can just wait it out. bgooren wrote: So I had a quick look at the source code of WebRequestCodingStrategy, and I think it should be possible to create a solution for your problem quite easily: -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-encrypt-obfuscate-resource-reference--tp27744679p27754796.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- take your photos everywhere you go - https://www.memolio.com follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Memolio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Hi Stefan, I'm a bit lost in the wicketstuff maven repository - when I browse I only see 1.4.1 and 1.4.2-SNAPSHOT. Any idea when this version will be in the maven repo? But for now it would be great if you could send me the pre-build jar. Thanks! Antoine On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de wrote: I have committed jWicket version 0.5.0 to wicketstuff Changes: - jQuery update to Version 1.4.2 - jQuery UI update to 1.8RC2 - drag/drop/resize improvements to work in IE 6/7/8 after AJAX update or in LazyLoad panels - drag/drop/resize improvements for less footprint in HTML, smaller js code generation - Effects rewritten completely, now covering all effects - Effects now support a chain of multiple effects Known Issues - Example application not very attractive - Example applicatioin contains some debugging code Let me know if someone needs prebuild jar files. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- take your photos everywhere you go - https://www.memolio.com follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Memolio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to encrypt/obfuscate resource reference?
for a discussion and suggestion see http://old.nabble.com/CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy-%2B-WebRequestCodingStrategy-%3D-resource-URLs-are-not-encrypted-(bug-).-td27209560.html quote I was able to get around this by subclassing WebRequestCodingStrategy and overriding methods: addResourceParameters(..); encode(RequestCycle requestCycle, ISharedResourceRequestTarget requestTarget); to use arguments rather than path as resource reference. haven't tried that myself yet, but will need it in the near future. IMHO it would make sense to include this in the CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy. regards Antoine. On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Sergey Olefir solf.li...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, out of the box Wicket generates urls for packaged resources that contain fully-qualified class names, e.g.: link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=resources/org.example.MyClassName/decorations/style.css / Now in accordance with our security policies we are not allowed to expose internal application details -- and fully qualified class name certainly fits that category. On the other hand we do very much want to package resources together with the components that use them -- this approach seems to be way more convenient in practice than any other option. So I've been looking into whether it is possible to encrypt resource references (at least the class name part). My research led me to SharedResources.resourceKey(final Class? scope, final String path, final Locale locale, final String style) method which apparently is responsible for inserting FQNs into urls. Unfortunately this place seems to be locked down hard -- method is 'NOT PART OF THE WICKET PUBLIC API' and corresponding accessor method in Application is final. Moreover the field containing the instance in Application is private final -- so even reflection is no help. So any ideas how can I encrypt/obfuscate resource references without resorting to aliasing every single class on the classloader path? (aliasing 'as needed' is not really an option as it would be devilishly hard to ensure that there are no un-aliased urls as the system is developed in the future and new components/resources are added) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- take your photos everywhere you go - https://www.memolio.com follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Memolio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to encrypt/obfuscate resource reference?
Oops :-) can't you just take the path and encrypt that using the same strategy as the cryptedurl.. thingy is using? Antoine On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Sergey Olefir solf.li...@gmail.com wrote: He he, that was my old thread there :) Thing is, I just recently discovered, that encoding resources as arguments (rather than paths) completely breaks relative URLs discussed there: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-'resolve'-URL-in-stylesheet--td27720293.html (for the simple reason that browser strips out arguments when resolving relative url). So it is necessary to come up with some other solution. Antoine van Wel wrote: for a discussion and suggestion see http://old.nabble.com/CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy-%2B-WebRequestCodingStrategy-%3D-resource-URLs-are-not-encrypted-(bug-).-td27209560.html -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-encrypt-obfuscate-resource-reference--tp27744679p27745911.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- take your photos everywhere you go - https://www.memolio.com follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Memolio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Validate with info messages, instead of errors
As for the link you show, the author is building something which is available in the Wicket core, which he seems to have missed or perhaps it's just an outdated article. Make a FeedbackPanel for every FormComponent you want to have messages for and initialize it with a ComponentFeedbackMessageFilter so you will only see the info/error messages relevant to the FormComponent you attach that filter to. I don't really see the problem with adapting a MaximumValidator output info messages instead of errors, just override validate or copy and paste the whole thing and adapt it, it's a small class. Antoine. On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:27 PM, espen.peder...@husbanken.no wrote: Hi all! I'm Looking for a way to perform validation, but print the messages as INFO (with Ajax), instead of ERRORs. I'd like to have a combination of error and info validators. An error will prevent the user from submitting the form, the info message will give the user a warning/info message. The messages should popup during an onblur event from the component and be displayed in a way similar to: http://stuq.nl/weblog/2008-09-03/user-friendly-form-validation-with-wicket . I've been looking into extending for instance MaximumValidator and let it report info messages, unfortunately I'm unable to get hold og the Component through the IValidatable interface impl. The error message, which I'd like to use, is built up inside the FromComponents error method and unavailable for me. Maybe I'm on the wrong the wrong path here? Anybody that has done something similar? -- Espen Ønvik Pedersen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Form validation without a form component
for the archive-searchers :) simply override onValidate in the Form class, check your listsize there call error() when applicable Antoine On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:25 PM, triswork tristan.k...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the suggestion Martijn. I tried return new FormComponent[0]; and got exactly the same error. I think my use-case is quite fringe, so I have resigned myself to using the hidden field that you previously suggested. - Tristan Martijn Dashorst wrote: You might try to return an empty array.. Martijn -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Form-validation-without-a-form-component-tp22682572p22866535.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
expecting different behavior from form validation - potential bug?
hi, In a nested form the onValidate() is overridden. It sets an error message on a component inside this form - so not on the form itself. However the submit on the form itself is executed as if no error exists. What I see when debugging is that hasErrorMessages on the inside nested form returns false. Is this correct? Should I explicitly set an error on the form, or something else to indicate the form itself has an error? ..using 1.4.6 Antoine. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy + WebRequestCodingStrategy = resource URLs are not encrypted (bug?).
ok, added WICKET-2731
Antoine
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
not sure that is possible currently. the aliasing only works on a per
class level. see SharedResources.putClassAlias().
you can add an rfe to have it enhanced.
seems like a quiet arbitrary requirement, especially when it comes to
security. an fqn does not give anything away security-wise.
-igor
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Antoine van Wel
antoine.van@gmail.com wrote:
What can you do if you need to enforce that no fqn's are ever
generated in (resource) paths?
Best I can think of now is putting a breakpoint in the resourceKey
method where the fqn is retrieved, and then stepping through your full
webapp - which is a rather poor solution. Any other ideas?
Antoine
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
the original design goal of the crypted strategy was to only encrypt
what the user sees in the url bar. since they never see resource urls
there was no reason to encrypt those.
re fqns, you can add class aliases into SharedResources to hide those.
-igor
2010/1/18 Sergejs Olefirs sergejs.olef...@parex.lv:
Hi,
I started using Wicket rather recently. As part of our security
considerations, we do not want immediately expose the underlying
framework(s) we are using, so we went ahead with URL encryption. We used
standard approach as described in examples:
@Override
protected IRequestCycleProcessor newRequestCycleProcessor() {
return new WebRequestCycleProcessor(){
protected IRequestCodingStrategy newRequestCodingStrategy(){
return new CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy(new
WebRequestCodingStrategy());
}
};
}
Unfortunately I later discovered that this approach doesn't encrypt
resource
URLs, e.g. from:
CSSPackageResource.getHeaderContribution(..);
or
link.add(new Image(logoImage));
What's worse such resource references include FQN of related classes.
After some investigation I found out that the problem is that
CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy only encrypts arguments string of the
URL
and WebRequestCodingStrategy encodes resource references as path rather
than
as argument.
I was able to get around this by subclassing WebRequestCodingStrategy and
overriding methods:
addResourceParameters(..);
encode(RequestCycle requestCycle, ISharedResourceRequestTarget
requestTarget);
to use arguments rather than path as resource reference.
However I'm unsure as to original reasoning behind original
CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy and WebRequestCodingStrategy. Is the
resource behaviour simply a bug? Or is it there for some reason that is
going to bite me down the road if I use my own 'fix'?
Best regards,
Sergey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
take your photos everywhere you go - https://www.memolio.com
follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Memolio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy + WebRequestCodingStrategy = resource URLs are not encrypted (bug?).
What can you do if you need to enforce that no fqn's are ever
generated in (resource) paths?
Best I can think of now is putting a breakpoint in the resourceKey
method where the fqn is retrieved, and then stepping through your full
webapp - which is a rather poor solution. Any other ideas?
Antoine
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
the original design goal of the crypted strategy was to only encrypt
what the user sees in the url bar. since they never see resource urls
there was no reason to encrypt those.
re fqns, you can add class aliases into SharedResources to hide those.
-igor
2010/1/18 Sergejs Olefirs sergejs.olef...@parex.lv:
Hi,
I started using Wicket rather recently. As part of our security
considerations, we do not want immediately expose the underlying
framework(s) we are using, so we went ahead with URL encryption. We used
standard approach as described in examples:
@Override
protected IRequestCycleProcessor newRequestCycleProcessor() {
return new WebRequestCycleProcessor(){
protected IRequestCodingStrategy newRequestCodingStrategy(){
return new CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy(new
WebRequestCodingStrategy());
}
};
}
Unfortunately I later discovered that this approach doesn't encrypt resource
URLs, e.g. from:
CSSPackageResource.getHeaderContribution(..);
or
link.add(new Image(logoImage));
What's worse such resource references include FQN of related classes.
After some investigation I found out that the problem is that
CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy only encrypts arguments string of the URL
and WebRequestCodingStrategy encodes resource references as path rather than
as argument.
I was able to get around this by subclassing WebRequestCodingStrategy and
overriding methods:
addResourceParameters(..);
encode(RequestCycle requestCycle, ISharedResourceRequestTarget
requestTarget);
to use arguments rather than path as resource reference.
However I'm unsure as to original reasoning behind original
CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy and WebRequestCodingStrategy. Is the
resource behaviour simply a bug? Or is it there for some reason that is
going to bite me down the road if I use my own 'fix'?
Best regards,
Sergey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
take your photos everywhere you go - https://www.memolio.com
follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Memolio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
how to update a form model when clicking a link
On a page there's a form with a textarea. Somewhere else on the page there is a wicket link, which is not inside the form. The user types something in the textarea and then presses the link. Now what I'd like to achieve is when the code of the link is executed, the model of the form is up-to-date - so what the user has typed, should be inside the model. The form should not be submitted. Any suggestions how this can be done - preferably without writing Javascript? Thanks, Antoine -- take your photos everywhere you go - https://www.memolio.com follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Memolio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: how to update a form model when clicking a link
Thanks for the replies. Peter: that won't work - the contents of the textarea are not transferred to the wicket app without some javascript / ajax magic happening under the hood Pedro: Using that I could let the component listen to onchange event but that would cause an unacceptable load. I really want the model update action to be initiated by the link. Or can I let clicking the link generate an event which then will be picked up by the component? Antoine On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote: you can add an AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior on your textarea to keep the model updated On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Peter Arnulf Lustig u...@yahoo.dewrote: Have you tried assign a Model to the component which needs to be updated? ModelString model = new ModelString(); --- assign to the component of the form. i.e. final TextField tf = new TextField(txt, model); in Link Execution - tf.setModel(mode); - Ursprüngliche Mail Von: Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com An: users@wicket.apache.org Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 21. Oktober 2009, 13:22:01 Uhr Betreff: how to update a form model when clicking a link On a page there's a form with a textarea. Somewhere else on the page there is a wicket link, which is not inside the form. The user types something in the textarea and then presses the link. Now what I'd like to achieve is when the code of the link is executed, the model of the form is up-to-date - so what the user has typed, should be inside the model. The form should not be submitted. Any suggestions how this can be done - preferably without writing Javascript? Thanks, Antoine -- take your photos everywhere you go - https://www.memolio.com follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Memolio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos -- take your photos everywhere you go - https://www.memolio.com follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Memolio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: how to update a form model when clicking a link
Thanks, it works!
In my case submitting the form is not natural at all - the form submit
does a lot of actions while all I want is the text that the user
entered to show up in the next page. (The link that is being clicked
is not directly related to the form.)
Now I got a new question related to this... Instead of attaching this
behavior to a link, I want this behavior attached to a form submit. So
got 2 forms on the page, that event needs to get triggered on form
submit.. Guess I need to put the same hook in the action of the
form. But how to do that and afterwards continue with the original
action? (The headache is caused when pressing the enter key in that
second form.)
Antoine
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote:
Or can I let clicking the link generate an event which then will be picked
up by the component
you can, but is an workaround:
1 - add AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior on your textarea for 'metal' event
2 - add
eval(Wicket.$('mytextareamarkupid').getAttribute('metal'))
on 'onclick' event of your link
But... seems very natural require the user submit the form that contains the
textarea.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for the replies.
Peter: that won't work - the contents of the textarea are not
transferred to the wicket app without some javascript / ajax magic
happening under the hood
Pedro: Using that I could let the component listen to onchange event
but that would cause an unacceptable load. I really want the model
update action to be initiated by the link. Or can I let clicking the
link generate an event which then will be picked up by the component?
Antoine
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote:
you can add an AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior on your textarea to keep
the model updated
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Peter Arnulf Lustig u...@yahoo.de
wrote:
Have you tried assign a Model to the component which needs to be
updated?
ModelString model = new ModelString();
--- assign to the component of the form.
i.e. final TextField tf = new TextField(txt, model);
in Link Execution
- tf.setModel(mode);
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 21. Oktober 2009, 13:22:01 Uhr
Betreff: how to update a form model when clicking a link
On a page there's a form with a textarea.
Somewhere else on the page there is a wicket link, which is not inside
the
form.
The user types something in the textarea and then presses the link.
Now what I'd like to achieve is when the code of the link is executed,
the model of the form is up-to-date - so what the user has typed,
should be inside the model. The form should not be submitted.
Any suggestions how this can be done - preferably without writing
Javascript?
Thanks,
Antoine
--
take your photos everywhere you go - https://www.memolio.com
follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Memolio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
--
take your photos everywhere you go - https://www.memolio.com
follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Memolio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
--
take your photos everywhere you go - https://www.memolio.com
follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Memolio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: how to update a form model when clicking a link
Problem solved, no need to touch the action attribute, just put the
call in onsubmit and leave the action untouched.
Antoine
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Antoine van Wel
antoine.van@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, it works!
In my case submitting the form is not natural at all - the form submit
does a lot of actions while all I want is the text that the user
entered to show up in the next page. (The link that is being clicked
is not directly related to the form.)
Now I got a new question related to this... Instead of attaching this
behavior to a link, I want this behavior attached to a form submit. So
got 2 forms on the page, that event needs to get triggered on form
submit.. Guess I need to put the same hook in the action of the
form. But how to do that and afterwards continue with the original
action? (The headache is caused when pressing the enter key in that
second form.)
Antoine
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote:
Or can I let clicking the link generate an event which then will be picked
up by the component
you can, but is an workaround:
1 - add AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior on your textarea for 'metal' event
2 - add
eval(Wicket.$('mytextareamarkupid').getAttribute('metal'))
on 'onclick' event of your link
But... seems very natural require the user submit the form that contains the
textarea.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for the replies.
Peter: that won't work - the contents of the textarea are not
transferred to the wicket app without some javascript / ajax magic
happening under the hood
Pedro: Using that I could let the component listen to onchange event
but that would cause an unacceptable load. I really want the model
update action to be initiated by the link. Or can I let clicking the
link generate an event which then will be picked up by the component?
Antoine
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote:
you can add an AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior on your textarea to keep
the model updated
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Peter Arnulf Lustig u...@yahoo.de
wrote:
Have you tried assign a Model to the component which needs to be
updated?
ModelString model = new ModelString();
--- assign to the component of the form.
i.e. final TextField tf = new TextField(txt, model);
in Link Execution
- tf.setModel(mode);
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 21. Oktober 2009, 13:22:01 Uhr
Betreff: how to update a form model when clicking a link
On a page there's a form with a textarea.
Somewhere else on the page there is a wicket link, which is not inside
the
form.
The user types something in the textarea and then presses the link.
Now what I'd like to achieve is when the code of the link is executed,
the model of the form is up-to-date - so what the user has typed,
should be inside the model. The form should not be submitted.
Any suggestions how this can be done - preferably without writing
Javascript?
Thanks,
Antoine
--
take your photos everywhere you go - https://www.memolio.com
follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Memolio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
--
take your photos everywhere you go - https://www.memolio.com
follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Memolio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
--
take your photos everywhere you go - https://www.memolio.com
follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Memolio
--
take your photos everywhere you go - https://www.memolio.com
follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Memolio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: better way to strip wicket markup / tags per page?
Craig: didn't consider that. So, no clean solution seems to be possible.
Pedro: yes I was talking about having the wicket-tags turned on for the
application except for a certain (xml) page, since it is causing parse
errors in the xml there.
Antoine
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Craig McIlwee
craig.mcil...@openroadsconsulting.com wrote:
I don't see how this can work reliably when there is more than 1 user,
AFAIK wicket has no synchronization in place that prevents 2 pages from
going through the render phase at the same time. So if one page finishes
rendering and changes the setting to false while another page has just
started rendering (e.g. the line immediately after change the setting to
true) then that page will render with the wrong value.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Antoine van Wel [mailto:antoine.van@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 9:03 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: better way to strip wicket markup / tags per page?
Thanks for the lightning fast reply.
Yes it works fine under development. Still I don't like it - after all
these
statements are also executed during production mode, and even though they
can't do any harm there, I'd rather not see them there at all. More a
matter
of personal taste I guess.
Anyway I have something in mind to improve it according to my taste. Will
implement that when I got time... This is not really an urgent issue to me.
Thanks anyway for the reply - I'm assuming now there really is no other way
to do this than temporarily changing the global settings.
Antoine
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Marat Radchenko
slonopotamusor...@gmail.com wrote:
In some situations during development...
With that in mind, this solution is absolutely ok.
2009/9/29 Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com
Hi,
on the wiki[1] it is described how to get rid of wicket markup such as
wicket:id attributes on a page basis.
The solution looks like a dirty hack to me which may go wrong when for
instance exceptions occur. Does anybody know of a better way?
For completeness sake, here is the code duplicated from the wiki:
private boolean stripTags;
public TestPage() {
stripTags =
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().getStripWicketTags();
}
@Override
protected void onBeforeRender() {
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true);
}
@Override
protected void onAfterRender() {
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(stripTags);
}
Thanks in advance,
Antoine.
References:
[1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-remove-wicket-markup-from-output.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
better way to strip wicket markup / tags per page?
Hi,
on the wiki[1] it is described how to get rid of wicket markup such as
wicket:id attributes on a page basis.
The solution looks like a dirty hack to me which may go wrong when for
instance exceptions occur. Does anybody know of a better way?
For completeness sake, here is the code duplicated from the wiki:
private boolean stripTags;
public TestPage() {
stripTags = Application.get().getMarkupSettings().getStripWicketTags();
}
@Override
protected void onBeforeRender() {
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true);
}
@Override
protected void onAfterRender() {
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(stripTags);
}
Thanks in advance,
Antoine.
References:
[1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-remove-wicket-markup-from-output.html
Re: better way to strip wicket markup / tags per page?
Thanks for the lightning fast reply.
Yes it works fine under development. Still I don't like it - after all these
statements are also executed during production mode, and even though they
can't do any harm there, I'd rather not see them there at all. More a matter
of personal taste I guess.
Anyway I have something in mind to improve it according to my taste. Will
implement that when I got time... This is not really an urgent issue to me.
Thanks anyway for the reply - I'm assuming now there really is no other way
to do this than temporarily changing the global settings.
Antoine
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Marat Radchenko
slonopotamusor...@gmail.com wrote:
In some situations during development...
With that in mind, this solution is absolutely ok.
2009/9/29 Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com
Hi,
on the wiki[1] it is described how to get rid of wicket markup such as
wicket:id attributes on a page basis.
The solution looks like a dirty hack to me which may go wrong when for
instance exceptions occur. Does anybody know of a better way?
For completeness sake, here is the code duplicated from the wiki:
private boolean stripTags;
public TestPage() {
stripTags =
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().getStripWicketTags();
}
@Override
protected void onBeforeRender() {
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true);
}
@Override
protected void onAfterRender() {
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(stripTags);
}
Thanks in advance,
Antoine.
References:
[1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-remove-wicket-markup-from-output.html
--
--8--8--
take your photos everywhere you go - http://www.memolio.com
--8--8--
We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin
Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. -
Henry Ford
--8--8--
Re: UTF-8
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote: Everybody should stop using any other encoding then UTF-8 Common people we should start this change from happening now :) Drop all charsets and all over the world. ban them everywhere, it should be illegal to use them, if you do still use them you should be thrown in to prison for at least 5 years. UTF-8 everywhere! Agreed! So let's set the default settings to UTF-8, instead of the system settings. Would have saved me some time debugging... My development environment uses UTF-8, deployment environment does not, so that was causing some trouble. Antoine
htmlvalidator / responsefilter not executed through wickettester?
Hi, HtmlValidator [1] turns out to be a great help for those who care about valid (x)html. Now I'm trying to get it to work in my unit tests, it doesn't seem to be picked up; in fact I wonder if any responsefilter is being executed at all when running from wickettester. What do you think? The filter is added exactly as described in the blog through getRequestCycleSettings().addResponseFilter(htmlValidator) and I'm sure that is being executed. thanks Antoine [1] http://wicketinaction.com/2009/06/wicket-html-validator-12/ -- --8--8-- take your photos everywhere you go - http://www.memolio.com --8--8-- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford --8--8--
Re: htmlvalidator / responsefilter not executed through wickettester?
Thanks for the quick response. Somehow I get the feeling a patch will take quite some effort and time is kind of scarce now... :-) Antoine On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: HtmlValidator was not designed for use in WicketTester, see my response to this question [1]. That said, I'd like to extend HtmlValidator to be useful with wickettester and will gladly accept patches :-) Martijn [1] http://osdir.com/ml/users-wicket.apache.org/2009-08/msg00260.html On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Antoine van Welantoine.van@gmail.com wrote: Hi, HtmlValidator [1] turns out to be a great help for those who care about valid (x)html. Now I'm trying to get it to work in my unit tests, it doesn't seem to be picked up; in fact I wonder if any responsefilter is being executed at all when running from wickettester. What do you think? The filter is added exactly as described in the blog through getRequestCycleSettings().addResponseFilter(htmlValidator) and I'm sure that is being executed. thanks Antoine [1] http://wicketinaction.com/2009/06/wicket-html-validator-12/ -- --8--8-- take your photos everywhere you go - http://www.memolio.com --8--8-- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford --8--8-- -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- --8--8-- take your photos everywhere you go - http://www.memolio.com --8--8-- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford --8--8--
Re: Failed to handle wicket:container
replace the wicket:container by a div, and a better error message may appear. in my case the error appeared for a wrong wicket:id (using 1.3.6) it would be helpful if the error message made more sense, shall i file a jira issue for this? (don't know if the same message occurs in 1.4) Antoine On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Jonathan Locke jonathan.lo...@gmail.comwrote: I am currently trying to debug a markup handling problem where Wicket is complaining that it Failed to handle: wicket:container wicket:id=xyz I suspect that the problem is mine as I am mucking around with content types to deal with mobile devices. Any ideas on what might be wrong or what might be a good approach for debugging this? Also, I've changed markup loading a bit so it switches back and forth between .wml and .html files (falling back on the .html if the .wml does not exist). Would this cause any havoc with resolving this wicket:container tag? Thanks, Jon -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Failed-to-handle-wicket%3Acontainer-tp16598980p16598980.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- --8--8-- take your photos everywhere you go - http://www.memolio.com --8--8-- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford --8--8--
form inside table not displayed on ajax call
Hi all, I have a table with various rows in them with an action link per row. When pressing the action link, that row disappears, and new rows are inserted. It works as a charm, except when the newly inserted rows are surrounded by a form tag, so inside the form, there are tr tags. What happens then is... nothing! The row with the action link disappears as it should, but the new rows are not rendered. In the Ajax-debug-window I see the table is returned as expected, including the form and new rows. When I turn on these extra rows on the initial run (so everything visible) the table renders correctly, showing everything. When I move the form inside a row, it works fine... but that's not enough.. Cannot imagine this is really a Wicket problem... Using Wicket 1.3.6 + Firefox Any tips appreciated! Antoine. -- --8--8-- take your photos everywhere you go - http://www.memolio.com --8--8-- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford --8--8--
Re: form inside table not displayed on ajax call
why, of course... thanks for your quick reply! Antoine. On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote: html spec does not allow you to nest a form tag inside a table tag unless the form is inside a td -igor On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Antoine van Welantoine.van@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I have a table with various rows in them with an action link per row. When pressing the action link, that row disappears, and new rows are inserted. It works as a charm, except when the newly inserted rows are surrounded by a form tag, so inside the form, there are tr tags. What happens then is... nothing! The row with the action link disappears as it should, but the new rows are not rendered. In the Ajax-debug-window I see the table is returned as expected, including the form and new rows. When I turn on these extra rows on the initial run (so everything visible) the table renders correctly, showing everything. When I move the form inside a row, it works fine... but that's not enough.. Cannot imagine this is really a Wicket problem... Using Wicket 1.3.6 + Firefox Any tips appreciated! Antoine. -- --8--8-- take your photos everywhere you go - http://www.memolio.com --8--8-- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford --8--8-- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- --8--8-- take your photos everywhere you go - http://www.memolio.com --8--8-- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford --8--8--
Re: QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy not encoding te?t - is this correct?
Hi Liam, thanks for your response. I'm really surprised - I'll undo my fix then.. regards, Antoine On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Liam Clarke-Hutchinson l...@steelsky.co.nz wrote: Unless I'm reading the RFC wrong, the behaviour of QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy is correct... http://labs.apache.org/webarch/uri/rfc/rfc3986.html#components The query component contains non-hierarchical data that, along with data in the path component, serves to identify a resource within the scope of the URI's scheme and naming authority (if any). The query component is indicated by the first question mark (?) character and terminated by a number sign (#) character or by the end of the URI. query = *( pchar / / / ? ) The characters slash (/) and question mark (?) may represent data within the query component. Beware that some older, erroneous implementations may not handle such data correctly when it is used as the base URI for relative references (Section 5.1), apparently because they fail to distinguish query data from path data when looking for hierarchical separators. However, as query components are often used to carry identifying information in the form of key=value pairs and one frequently used value is a reference to another URI, it is sometimes better for usability to avoid percent-encoding those characters. On 4/23/09, Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, using 1.3.5 : mounted a bookmarkable page using the QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy, now I'm passing in a page parameter with key search and value te?t -- the target url is ?search=te?t tracing this, turns out the QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy just applies UTF-8 encoding (or whatever has been set on the application level). Are this behavior and the constructed URL correct? I would expect a URL like ?search=te%3Ft regards Antoine -- --8--8-- take your photos everywhere you go - http://www.memolio.com --8--8-- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford --8--8-- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- --8--8-- take your photos everywhere you go - http://www.memolio.com --8--8-- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford --8--8--
QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy not encoding te?t - is this correct?
Hi all, using 1.3.5 : mounted a bookmarkable page using the QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy, now I'm passing in a page parameter with key search and value te?t -- the target url is ?search=te?t tracing this, turns out the QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy just applies UTF-8 encoding (or whatever has been set on the application level). Are this behavior and the constructed URL correct? I would expect a URL like ?search=te%3Ft regards Antoine -- --8--8-- take your photos everywhere you go - http://www.memolio.com --8--8-- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford --8--8--
urlFor troubles
One issue I keep running into when programming with Wicket is using urlFor... I guess I am missing something. Now I am trying to redirect to a page; /hello is mounted to HelloPage using an indexed mounting strategy /user is mounted to UserPage when a user types /hello/username, HelloPage captures this and should redirect to /user ; for that I am using throw new RedirectToUrlException(urlFor(UserPage.class, params).toString()); However, urlFor will generate ../user/username instead of /user/username which will result in a wrong URL in a browser. Using RequestUtils.toAbsolutePath ( .. ) on it will break my unit test, since it doesn't like the full path including http://... in combination with the RedirectToUrlException. (It won't find the UserPage class). Any thoughts what's the best way to tackle this? Now I just strip off all the ../ which is being output by urlFor, but that really feels like a dirty hack. Using 1.3.5 - Antoine PS the common setResponsePage or throw RestartResponseException won't do in this case, since I want the URL in the browser to be displaying /user/username -- --8--8-- take your photos everywhere you go - http://www.memolio.com --8--8-- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford --8--8--
Re: urlFor troubles
Nope, didn't. Great, I didn't know that one, really simple. Saves me from using the urlFor this time, thanks! If there's a way to use urlFor in this case without the hacky approach, I'm still interested to know. Antoine On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com wrote: Have you tried setResponsePage after calling setRedirect(true)? -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.comwrote: One issue I keep running into when programming with Wicket is using urlFor... I guess I am missing something. Now I am trying to redirect to a page; /hello is mounted to HelloPage using an indexed mounting strategy /user is mounted to UserPage when a user types /hello/username, HelloPage captures this and should redirect to /user ; for that I am using throw new RedirectToUrlException(urlFor(UserPage.class, params).toString()); However, urlFor will generate ../user/username instead of /user/username which will result in a wrong URL in a browser. Using RequestUtils.toAbsolutePath ( .. ) on it will break my unit test, since it doesn't like the full path including http://... in combination with the RedirectToUrlException. (It won't find the UserPage class). Any thoughts what's the best way to tackle this? Now I just strip off all the ../ which is being output by urlFor, but that really feels like a dirty hack. Using 1.3.5 - Antoine PS the common setResponsePage or throw RestartResponseException won't do in this case, since I want the URL in the browser to be displaying /user/username -- --8--8-- take your photos everywhere you go - http://www.memolio.com --8--8-- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford --8--8-- -- --8--8-- take your photos everywhere you go - http://www.memolio.com --8--8-- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford --8--8--
Re: Have a feature, want to contribute
Same here! Great idea Marat... I missed the original post. And I can use it right now... Antoine. On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Alex Objelean alexandru.objel...@isdc.rowrote: Marat, as you can see people are interested and waiting for this feature to be published somewhere Alex Marat Radchenko-2 wrote: Wicket pages/components can be either stateful or stateless. Wicket manages hem transparently and it is very easy to write any complex page you want. Stateful pages are much more powerful than stateless. However that comes at a cost of using page store for their state. On highload sites it is usually desired to minimize session-scope data, and move it to request-scope. That's when Wicket users approach a task of making stateful pages stateless. However stateless state (sic!) is very fragile, if you add a single stateful component to a page, it instantly becomes stateful (and you even might not notice that if your other page content can work in both modes. And here comes my lovely feature - @StatelessComponent. It is an annotation that you should put on components which you want to be stateless. It doesn't do any magic, it simply uses postComponentOnBeforeRender to assert that annotated component (and all its children) are stateless. If it doesn't, an exception is thrown, indicating what component tries to be stateful. This feature isn't large enough to be put in a separate project (just one annotation and one listener) but wee find it extremely useful on our project. I'd be happy to give it to Wicket project (or wicketstuff?) at absolutely no cost (tests included) under same license as wicket itself, if Wicket developers are interested in it. I'll file a feature request with a patch, if Wicket team finds this useful in Wicket core. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Have-a-feature%2C-want-to-contribute-tp21079751p22498471.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford
bug? RequestUtils.toAbsolutePath using AJAX is not constructing a valid path
Hey hey, trying to construct a URL like this: RequestUtils.toAbsolutePath(urlFor(MyPage.class, null).toString()); this works fine in general, but when executed using AJAX calls, it produces http:/mypagemountpath instead of the expected http://my.host.name/mypagemountpath Am I missing something or is this a bug? - Antoine -- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford
error messages due to hack/search-bots
Heya, we're trying to catch all errors caused by hack search-bots on our wicket-app. AFAIK these bots take existing links, chop 'em up in smaller chunks and try to append all kind of . We've caught most of the errors which result due to these bots, but this one still stands: XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX - - [22/Dec/2008:00:03:37 +0100] GET /resources/org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WicketEventReference_false_61497/ HTTP/1.1 404 952 - - - Causing errors such as 2008-12-22 00:03:41,654 ERROR - [TP-Processor7][org.apache.wicket.request.target.resource.SharedResourceRequestTarget:172] unable to lazily register shared resource org.apache.wicket.ajax.WicketAjaxReference_false_61497/ java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.wicket.ajax.WicketAjaxReference_false_61497 at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1387) [...snip...] So... any ideas to catch these errors? Antoine -- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: error messages due to hack/search-bots
Hmm, actually you have a point. Errors we've caught until now where mis-constructed URLs for pages; those could be user errors too so we wanted to identify all places where it could break and present a good feedback message to the user. But in this particular case something/someone is clearly messing around. Since these errors don't hurt, we don't want to be spammed by error messages. Hence filtering this one out sounds like a good idea. If somebody disagrees, then speak up now :-) thanks !! Antoine. On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Pointbreak pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote: Not an answer to your question, but why fight this kind of stuff? It's an invalid request, so it should result in an error. If you don't want these entries in your log, you could just add a filter to your logger (e.g. filtering out error messages from org.apache.wicket.request.target.resource.SharedResourceRequestTarget where the message equals unable to lazily register shared resource). On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:05 +0100, Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com wrote: Heya, we're trying to catch all errors caused by hack search-bots on our wicket-app. AFAIK these bots take existing links, chop 'em up in smaller chunks and try to append all kind of . We've caught most of the errors which result due to these bots, but this one still stands: XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX - - [22/Dec/2008:00:03:37 +0100] GET /resources/org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WicketEventReference_false_61497/ HTTP/1.1 404 952 - - - Causing errors such as 2008-12-22 00:03:41,654 ERROR - [TP-Processor7][org.apache.wicket.request.target.resource.SharedResourceRequestTarget:172] unable to lazily register shared resource org.apache.wicket.ajax.WicketAjaxReference_false_61497/ java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.wicket.ajax.WicketAjaxReference_false_61497 at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1387) [...snip...] So... any ideas to catch these errors? Antoine -- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: error messages due to hack/search-bots
Hmm, actually you have a point. Errors we've caught until now where mis-constructed URLs for pages; those could be user errors too so we wanted to identify all places where it could break and present a good feedback message to the user. But in this particular case something/someone is clearly messing around. Since these errors don't hurt, we don't want to be spammed by error messages. Hence filtering this one out sounds like a good idea. If somebody disagrees, then speak up now :-) thanks !! Antoine. On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Pointbreak pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote: Not an answer to your question, but why fight this kind of stuff? It's an invalid request, so it should result in an error. If you don't want these entries in your log, you could just add a filter to your logger (e.g. filtering out error messages from org.apache.wicket.request.target.resource.SharedResourceRequestTarget where the message equals unable to lazily register shared resource). On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:05 +0100, Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com wrote: Heya, we're trying to catch all errors caused by hack search-bots on our wicket-app. AFAIK these bots take existing links, chop 'em up in smaller chunks and try to append all kind of . We've caught most of the errors which result due to these bots, but this one still stands: XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX - - [22/Dec/2008:00:03:37 +0100] GET /resources/org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WicketEventReference_false_61497/ HTTP/1.1 404 952 - - - Causing errors such as 2008-12-22 00:03:41,654 ERROR - [TP-Processor7][org.apache.wicket.request.target.resource.SharedResourceRequestTarget:172] unable to lazily register shared resource org.apache.wicket.ajax.WicketAjaxReference_false_61497/ java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.wicket.ajax.WicketAjaxReference_false_61497 at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1387) [...snip...] So... any ideas to catch these errors? Antoine -- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: error messages due to hack/search-bots
agree with Sebastiaan and Michael here when a user types a wrong url, you're not going to log that 404 - client error, file not found - no fixes necessary, so not logged 500 - server error - log it, needs to be fixed so instead of implementing the filter, I prefer waiting for a Wicket patch.. :-) Antoine On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Michael Sparer michael.spa...@gmx.at wrote: the thing is that 404 is a client error. I'd only log server errors (i.e. errors in the code) as Error. Of course a 404 can also happen due to a error in the code, but logging 404 as errors will flood your log file ... just my two cents Jeremy Thomerson-5 wrote: A 404 is an error - so on the one hand you say it is an error, but on the other, you say it isn't. I think it should remain an error. Just my 0.02 though. On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Sebastiaan van Erk sebs...@sebster.comwrote: Pointbreak wrote: Not an answer to your question, but why fight this kind of stuff? It's an invalid request, so it should result in an error. I actually prefer it would result in a 404 for the client and nothing more. Perhaps, when enabling DEBUG, it can log the message + exception it is currently logging as ERROR. If you don't want these entries in your log, you could just add a filter to your logger (e.g. filtering out error messages from org.apache.wicket.request.target.resource.SharedResourceRequestTarget where the message equals unable to lazily register shared resource). It is annoying (and dangerous) to filter your log in this way. The problem is that you may accidentally filter too much and miss real errors. Also, it requires you to know a lot about wicket internals (is this a real error, or should this be considered a warning?). And it is cumbersome (every time a new exception appears, you have to go through this process again). To the Wicket developers: why is this logged using log.error and not using log.debug (in SharedResourceRequestTarget#respond? It's not really an error, it's a reference to a resource that does not exist, and a 404 should be sufficient (without ERRORs in the log). Regards, Sebastiaan On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:05 +0100, Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com wrote: Heya, we're trying to catch all errors caused by hack search-bots on our wicket-app. AFAIK these bots take existing links, chop 'em up in smaller chunks and try to append all kind of . We've caught most of the errors which result due to these bots, but this one still stands: XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX - - [22/Dec/2008:00:03:37 +0100] GET /resources/org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WicketEventReference_false_61497/ HTTP/1.1 404 952 - - - Causing errors such as 2008-12-22 00:03:41,654 ERROR - [TP-Processor7][org.apache.wicket.request.target.resource.SharedResourceRequestTarget:172] unable to lazily register shared resource org.apache.wicket.ajax.WicketAjaxReference_false_61497/ java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.wicket.ajax.WicketAjaxReference_false_61497 at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1387) [...snip...] So... any ideas to catch these errors? Antoine -- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com - Michael Sparer http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/error-messages-due-to-hack-search-bots-tp21127488p21132409.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
getRequestUrl behavior difference between page call and ajax call
Hi, When calling (WebRequest)RequestCycle.get().getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest().getRequestURL() on a page with page parameters, I'm seeing different results: - when loading the page from the browser, the URL is returned including the page parameters; - when updating through AJAX, the URL is returned without the page parameters. Shouldn't the AJAX call incorporate these page parameters such that the results are consistent? What's your opinion on this? Thanks, Antoine. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: getRequestUrl behavior difference between page call and ajax call
by the way, this is the case for url coding strategies which use /par/ such as the default BookmarkablePageRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy IMHO these parameters should be stripped but perhaps not in the getRequest method; any method available which does just this? On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Antoine van Wel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, When calling (WebRequest)RequestCycle.get().getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest().getRequestURL() on a page with page parameters, I'm seeing different results: - when loading the page from the browser, the URL is returned including the page parameters; - when updating through AJAX, the URL is returned without the page parameters. Shouldn't the AJAX call incorporate these page parameters such that the results are consistent? What's your opinion on this? Thanks, Antoine. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: users, please give us your opinion: what is your take on generics with Wicket
1) Generifying* Wicket [X] Can best be done like currently in the 1.4 branch, where models and components are both generified. I care most about the improved static type checking generified models and components give Wicket. This is the only solution that makes sense, the other options are either a partial solution (which is a *very, very* bad thing, mixing generic with non-generic code INSIDE a framework!?!?) or no solution at all (which has my preference over a partial solution, since at least it is concise). 2) How strongly do you feel about your choice above? [X] I might rethink upgrading if my choice doesn't win. Seriously, no generics at all is better than a partial solution. Since upgrading involves more issues than generics alone, I may rethink only... If the decision to upgrade boils down to this issue, then I won't. Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IllegalStateException with AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable
Any updates on this one?
I think I'm experiencing the same issue; I'm building a DataView, in
its nodes there's a TextField with an OnChangeAjaxBehavior added to
it.
Then, from the RequestCycle, an error occurs when cleaning up the
AjaxRequestTarget, followed by an IllegalStateException: no page found
for component ... referring to this textfield.
Thanks,
Antoine.
On Sat, Feb 9, 2008 at 12:59 AM, jwray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor,
thanks for the help, I'll have to look at in detail next week.
What is odd to me is that I'm not doing anything out of the ordinary. I add
the table to the ajax target, and I don't remove any components myself.
Jonny
igor.vaynberg wrote:
hm, i still dont see the problem spot
the error is apparent
you are adding something to the ajax request target that is then
removed from the page, so when ajaxrequesttarget is trying to detach
the page it cant, because it does
component.getPage().detach();
apparently the component is removed from the page, so getpage() throws
that error you see.
if i were you i would set a breakpoint at that line, and see what
component exactly is removed from the page, and then try to figure out
why it is removed from the page and yet is added to the ajax target.
-igor
On Feb 8, 2008 9:47 AM, jwray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Igor,
I was hoping it would be an obvious problem. Here's my table construction
code (is there a better way of posting code?)
ListIColumn columns = new ArrayListIColumn();
PostOnSubmitAction peptideUpdateAction = new PostOnSubmitAction();
columns.add(new AjaxEditablePropertyColumn(peptideUpdateAction, new
Model(Comments), comments, comments, REQUIRED_ROLE));
PeptideDataProvider dataProvider = new PeptideDataProvider(service);
peptideViewTable = new AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable(dataTable, columns,
dataProvider, 25);
where the PostOnSubmitAction below is called from the onSubmit method of
the
AjaxEditableLabel within the AjaxEditablePropertyColumn. I'm attempting
to
refresh the table when an OptimisticLockingFailureException occurs (and
so
load the data altered by another user).
private class PostOnSubmitAction implements
AjaxEditablePropertyColumn.PostOnSubmitAction{
public void postOnSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Object value)
{
target.addComponent(getStatusPanel());
Peptide peptide = (Peptide)value;
try{
peptideServices.updatePeptide(peptide);
}
catch(AccessDeniedException e){
String message = You don't have permission to
perform this operation;
PeptidePage.this.error(message);
}
catch(OptimisticLockingFailureException e){
String message = Another user modified this data
before you. Review the
new data and resubmit changes if needed.;
PeptidePage.this.error(message);
target.addComponent(peptideViewTable);
}
catch(RuntimeException e){
String message = An unexpected error occured.
+e.getMessage();
PeptidePage.this.error(message);
}
}
}
thanks
Jonny
igor.vaynberg wrote:
some code would help us help you...
-igor
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IllegalStateException-with-AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable-tp15347366p15360512.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IllegalStateException-with-AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable-tp15347366p15366611.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Antoine van Wel
http://www.wellawaretech.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
