Sorry, didn't mean to sound dismissive. It's a valid point, just I'm
not seeing that anybody could get to anything otherwise unavailable.
On Mon, 25 May 2020 21:02:08 +0200
Carl-Eric Menzel wrote:
> I think the point of this version decoration is not to ensure a
> particular v
I think the point of this version decoration is not to ensure a
particular version is requested, because typically only one version of
a file is available in the application.
The point is instead to defeat any caching, both in the browser and by
proxies, which might serve the user an outdated
Hi James,
Some time ago I wrote this:
https://github.com/duesenklipper/wicket-appendablerepeater
It should work with forms. If not, let me know.
Best regards
Carl-Eric
On 27.03.2018 14:42, James Carman wrote:
It has been a while since I've used Wicket and man, I really forgot how
much I
You can use a org.apache.wicket.request.resource.ByteArrayResource
instead - It's an IResource implementation that takes a byte array. You
can then use the resource in a DownloadLink, for example.
Carl-Eric
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:11:06 +0200
christoph.ma...@t-systems.com wrote:
Hello,
Iam
If the browser doesn't know how to display an excel file inline, it
will still open a download window.
This has nothing to do really with Wicket - if you want the browser to
display an actual Excel .xls file, you need a browser plugin that can
do it.
What you can do, for example, is parse the
You don't need an ajax behavior to do this. This is all client-side
javascript only, as described in the stackoverflow post.
You can of course use a regular behavior to emit the necessary
javascript.
Carl-Eric
On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 15:50:06 +0500
Farrukhjon SATTOROV (farrukh) fireda...@gmail.com
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:01:29 +
Michael Chandler michael.chand...@onassignment.com wrote:
I'm led to believe that creating a
reference to any of my domain classes within a Wicket component (as a
field or in a method implementation) will expose me to a
serialization error unless I put it in
On Wed, 07 Aug 2013 13:48:38 -0400
Bertrand Guay-Paquet ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote:
The problem I see is that AbstractRepeater's onPopulate() is called
during onBeforeRender() and this is not done when the stateless
status of the page is first checked. Therefore, no pageId is added
unless
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:42:14 -0800 (PST)
grazia grazia.russolass...@gmail.com wrote:
Say I have a page with several components all sharing the same model;
what are the rules of thumb to make sure the same model gets updated
byt the different components on the page ?
If you only ever pass
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:23:20 -0800 (PST)
grazia grazia.russolass...@gmail.com wrote:
If the form contains a panel, and that panels contains a textfield,
and all share the same IModelMyClass, this is what I see:
the textField model gets updated, but not the panel's model and not
the form's
form.add(new Button(appointButton) {
public void onSubmit() {
System.out.println(HERE = + getModelObject() );
-- whatever it is the choice in the autocomplete which is within
the MyPersonnelPanel this is always null
}
I didn't look
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:23:28 +0100
Martin Dietze d...@fh-wedel.de wrote:
IMO the problem is not that much how the response is generated,
but how the component is already uses within the system. At
this point creating a download link is simple as it simply is a
BookmarkableLink to that page
I would simply do this in a Resource (e.g. subclass AbstractResource)
rather than in a page. Resources are for binary data, Pages are for
markup. That way you don't have to mess around in any way with the
response or anything like that.
Is there a particular reason you're using a page?
Carl-Eric
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:47:16 +
Michael Chandler michael.chand...@onassignment.com wrote:
Good morning/afternoon everyone.
I'm having a basic problem fully deciphering how to best manage my
forms, specifically related to Models that are attached to forms.
Since a Wicket WebPage has it's
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:03:41 +0100
Martin Dietze d...@fh-wedel.de wrote:
On Mon, February 18, 2013, Carl-Eric Menzel wrote:
Is there a particular reason you're using a page?
One - unfortunately - big reason: it's legacy code (most of
which I did not even write myself). The Wicket upgrade
Most of the time, the class names are right, but sometimes, I don't
get Wicket org names, I get these:
com.mycompany.MyForm.MyPanel$1 ( -- on a Button!)
com.mycompany.SomeForm$1 ( -- on a Button!)
What's going on here, why can't I get the actual
Is there any way that i can merge all my properties file into one big
properties file ?
If you application class is MyApplication then you can put everything
into MyApplication.properties if you want.
Carl-Eric
-
To
Wicket github has both a 'master' 'trunk'. Which one should I
choose? (or is there something else for 'latest 1.6.x code'?)
It's currently still in master.
Carl-Eric
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[X] I use Shiro
We use Shiro on our project (using wicketstuff's shiro integration and
our own custom Shiro realm implementation). We use it because it gives
us a permission-based approach (not just roles-based) and is more
easily configured than e.g. SWARM/WASP. I also quite like the
Do you have a complete stacktrace?
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 06:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
nemanjko nemanja.kos...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure that the error I'm getting is related to the WICKET-4789
that was in 6.0,
but it looks like it.
After upgrading from 6.0.0 to 6.1.1, I am getting this error:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:54:27 -0600
Alec Swan alecs...@gmail.com wrote:
mountPage(ms, MyPage.class) generates URLs like /lrm/ms?oid=123
What I would like is URLs like /lrm/ms/oid/123
What's the easiest way to accomplish this?
mountPage(ms/oid/${oid}, MyPage.class);
The ms/oid/ is just the
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:48:05 +
Corbin, James jcor...@iqnavigator.com wrote:
input type=text wicket:id=someId …/
I would like to, instead, specify a span or a div in the markup and
bind the TextField to that markup instead.
Why? A TextField needs to bind to an input tag, because that is
Severity: Important
Vendor:
The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Apache Wicket 1.4.x and 1.5.x
Description:
https://wicket.apache.org/2012/09/06/cve-2012-3373.html
It is possible to inject JavaScript statements into an ajax link by
adding an encoded null byte to a URL pointing to a
This is 21st release of the Wicket 1.4.x series. This is also the last
release of the 1.4.x series, rounding up the remaining bugfixes. No
further releases will happen in this branch.
Git tag:
release/wicket-1.4.21
Changelog:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 11:36:06 -0400
Carter, Isaac isaac.car...@mantech.com wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone knows how to properly access components that
exist within a repeating listview? I have two buttons (we'll say an
edit and remove button) that I'm repeat over and add them to the
listview.
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:36:51 -0400
Andrew Geery andrew.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
My question is: should Wicket have realized that the proxy'ed Person
object was actually a Person class and called the appropriate
converter? Looking at this --
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:21:17 -0600
Alec Swan alecs...@gmail.com wrote:
I had to make sure that my img element had a closing /img
The problem is that
org.apache.wicket.util.tester.TagTester#createTagByAttribute requires
the img element to be closed, i.e. img/ or img/img. Otherwise
closeTag
In this case, yes, I think.
Carl-Eric
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:27:27 -0600
Alec Swan alecs...@gmail.com wrote:
So, this is a bug, right?
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Martin Grigorov
mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Carl-Eric Menzel
cmen...@wicketbuch.de
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:01:13 -0500
Douglas Ferguson the...@gmail.com wrote:
I was intrigued by the comment that more extensive use of Model
would reduce session size.
Why would this be? Won't models still wind up in the data graph for
the Page and thus be in the pagemap?
Well, apart from
You need to add the container to the panel:
add(postDomainContainer);
And you need to add the form to the container instead of the panel
itself:
postDomainContainer.add(commentForm);
Your component hierarchy must match the tag hierarchy.
Hope this helps
Carl-Eric
www.wicketbuch.de
On Sun,
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
kshitiz k.agarw...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply Dan...now consider a situation:
You have 5 drop downs, each with onselectionchange enabled. When you
change the choice of any one drop down, the chosen value should be
passed as parameter to
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
cmagnollay cmagnol...@gmail.com wrote:
So essentially I want to use Wicket 1.5 to display an item and its
associated quantity. The data structure I am using to back this is a
Map (new HashMap()) where Item is a POJ whose details are of no
consequence.
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
cmagnollay cmagnol...@gmail.com wrote:
if the map is called something like
MapItem, Integer itemMap = new HashMapItem, Integer();
Hmm, so I would instantiate the ListView like so?
[...]
Is this what you are implying somewhat? Thanks for the
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:38:36 -0700
Dan Retzlaff dretzl...@gmail.com wrote:
You can call LDM#detach() after the modification, but since this
particular implementation is so light, I'd just use
AbstractReadyOnlyModel instead. It doesn't cache, so detach is not
required.
Actually, getObject()
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:15:20 -0700
Dan Retzlaff dretzl...@gmail.com wrote:
I assumed the action phase would dereference the ListItemModel (e.g.
to remove it from the map), hence dereference the LDM, and then
require the explicit detach() before rendering. Agreed that LDM is
the way to go if
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 07:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
armhold armh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm thinking of storing the DTO in the user's session as a detached
entity, and using a model like the following on the various pages:
That is perfectly valid approach, and one that we've been using for
some usecases.
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 16:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
armhold armh...@gmail.com wrote:
SessionModelMyDTO model = new SessionModelMyDTO(MyDTO.KEY, new
MyDTO());
Not typesafe, as you pointed out, but fairly concise.
If you have a lot of different types where you use that, this map-like
approach is probably
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 16:08:37 +0100
Gaetan Zoritchak g.zoritc...@moncoachfinance.com wrote:
Hi all,
I use guice in my applications. I need to inject some code (service)
in a DynamicImageResource. It is not straightforward because a
Resource is not a component.
Does anybody has already done
There's a shiro integration project in wicketstuff-core. We use it and
it works well.
Carl-Eric
www.wicketbuch.de
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:56:25 -0800 (PST)
armandoxxx armando@dropchop.com wrote:
Got a little question.
I'm wrapping Apache Shiro as security framework for my application.
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:31:48 -0800 (PST)
massizigao fha...@online.de wrote:
Hello,
i am implementing a dataview table with a checkbox column. At the top
of the column i place a checkbox to select/unselect all rows. But It
is not working as i want.
Using the class Check: checking and
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:41:27 +0200
Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
RequestListenerInterface stops the execution of callbacks for disabled
and/or invisible components/behaviors but its seems it also forbids
requesting a resource ...
I think this is a not-so-easy problem, actually.
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:59:53 +0200
Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
I think this is a not-so-easy problem, actually. In this use case
(render an image) it seems obvious that even though the whole panel
is disabled, it is being rendered, so the image resource should
work.
Define
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 00:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
Zeldor pgronkiew...@gmail.com wrote:
It all works fine on my computer, but when I deploy it, it stops
working. Session gets detached on the way and I cannot fetche the
data to my models. Yes, I keep user data in my session, I could do it
with datastore
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 00:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
Zeldor pgronkiew...@gmail.com wrote:
2. How to fetch data from Guice in Session? I have a RepositoryUser
Inject, but when it is used in Session it throws nullpointer
exception. Should I have it in session at all? I guess repopulating
user data like that
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 01:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Zeldor pgronkiew...@gmail.com wrote:
But would it be possible to store User data in the session without
having to fetch it from datastore on every request? My users don't
interact with each other and they operate only on their own data. So
it'd be most
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:31:38 +0200
Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Yes, just put a field in your Session and add getter/setter.
This is not good.
This is error prone. This way you'll have to keep the instance in the
Session in sync with the data DB. Additionally the memory size
Do you have a quickstart to try this?
Carl-Eric
www.wicketbuch.de
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 13:37:03 -
martin.ase...@mail.bg wrote:
Would anyone help me with this? I'm desparate on fixing it
Thank you,
Martin
- Цитат от martin.ase...@mail.bg, на 06.09.2011 в 15:51
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:17:25 +0200
Martijn Dashorst dasho...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache Wicket team is proud to announce the immediate
availability of the newest release of their component oriented open
source Java web framework. Apache Wicket 1.5 has been in development
for the last two
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:29:22 -0400
Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Hello all,
I'm writing an article for a Java magazine and would like to
include in it a list of ten things every Wicket programmer must
know. Of course, I have my list, but I'd be very curious to see
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:10:30 +0300
Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
* compressing code by use of ids matching property names combined
with CompoundPropertyModel and/or PropertyListView
Oh.. that will lead to fragility.
It can, but in my experience it hasn't. Our
https://github.com/duesenklipper/wicket-safemodel
As I wrote earlier on this list, SafeModel lets you turn the fragile
strings of this:
IModelString childNameModel = new PropertyModelString(
myBean, child.name);
...into this, gaining refactor-safety:
IModelString childNameModel =
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:44:14 +0200
Thomas Matthijs li...@selckin.be wrote:
...into this, gaining refactor-safety:
IModelString childNameModel =
model(from(myBean).getChild().getName());
Does it require a default constructor?
In the above example, myBean is any sort of regular Java
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:04:31 -0700
Matt Brictson m...@55minutes.com wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 3:12 AM, Carl-Eric Menzel wrote:
IModelUser userModel = model(fromService(userEJB.loadUser(42)));
Not sure if this is a typo in your example, but wouldn't this mean
that (the real, non-proxied
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 06:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
eugenebalt eugeneb...@yahoo.com wrote:
li.add(new Label(bookId), new Model(a));
You're adding:
new Label(bookId), new Model(a)
That is a new Label and a new Model. You want:
new Label(bookId, new Model(a))
which is a new Label with an
After seeing the LambdaJ-based model idea at
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html#WorkingwithWicketmodels-LambdaJ
I thought I'd try and implement something like that in a ready-to-use
fashion, and simplify it a little.
The result is here:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:33:47 +0300
Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Matt,
You need first class functions.
All cool JVM langs support them. Just peek your favorite.
That is indeed true.
However, just for the fun of it, I'm going to try and implement at
least a limited version of
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 03:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
hariharansrc hariharan...@gmail.com wrote:
can anyone suggest the best search engine framework for wicket
Wicket doesn't really care what other frameworks you use beside it.
Wicket does nothing but the UI layer, and for everything else you can
use
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:36:45 +0200
Miroslav F. mir...@seznam.cz wrote:
After investigation I will answer myself - it is bug in tomcat, if
you are using tomcat
6.0.29 upgrade to 6.0.31.
Sounds like an interesting bug. Do you have any more information on
this?
Carl, static variables are good
();
}
catch(SQLException e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
-Original Message-
From: Carl-Eric Menzel [mailto:cmen...@wicketbuch.de]
Sent: Tuesday, 05. July 2011 10:37
To: users@wicket.apache.org
-serialization-td3641636.htm
l
Miro
-Original Message-
From: Carl-Eric Menzel [mailto:cmen...@wicketbuch.de]
Sent: Monday, 04. July 2011 20:47
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: error - serialization
Can you show some code?
Carl-Eric
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 08
: No suitable driver found I have to
restart tomcat and than
it works again.
-Original Message-
From: Carl-Eric Menzel [mailto:cmen...@wicketbuch.de]
Sent: Sunday, 03. July 2011 23:22
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: error - serialization
That means you don't
That means you don't have the appropriate driver jar in your classpath.
You need the PostgreSQL driver jar, put it on your classpath, and
initialize it.
Carl-Eric
www.wicketbuch.de
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 23:08:40 +0200
Miroslav F. mir...@seznam.cz wrote:
Still problem with no suitable driver found
a look at it and let me know whether it's any good :)
Carl-Eric
www.wicketbuch.de
On Thu, 12 May 2011 15:31:16 +0200
Carl-Eric Menzel cmen...@wicketbuch.de wrote:
I ran into the same issue some time ago and did some work on (I think)
the CheckGroupSelector, as well as Javascript selectors
I ran into the same issue some time ago and did some work on (I think)
the CheckGroupSelector, as well as Javascript selectors for the other
types of checkboxes. I'll see over the weekend whether I can extract
all that into a useful patch. Once heapifyman opens the ticket, I'll
attach it there.
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:43:29 +0100
Maarten Billemont lhun...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08 Mar 2011, at 16:39, Pedro Santos wrote:
I vote for solution 3: postpone the onInitialize call, possible to
the first Component#configure execution. Then the problem of
initialization code being executed
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:46:26 +0100
Maarten Billemont lhun...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a valid vote if we can come up with a way of not having
random failure side-effects from mixing the two (which is the whole
reason the the issue exists in the first place), without a final
onInitialize and an
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:10:42 -0800
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
the problem is indeed that you are sharing state between pages which
is not allowed. you are doing it via one page passing in an anonymous
SelectionCallback to another page, which is the same as passing in an
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:53:21 +0100
Wilhelmsen Tor Iver toriv...@arrive.no wrote:
So the best is to create a proper class that is nested but not a
member class:
private static class BackSomePage {
private PageReference pageRef;
public BackSomePage(PageReference pageRef) {
this.
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:06:09 +0100
Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
The anon-inner class still keeps a reference to the previous page.
Yes, I know, that's how anonymous classes work. I don't understand why
that is now a problem though. It has worked well so far.
Carl-Eric
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:51:12 +0100
Carl-Eric Menzel cmen...@wicketbuch.de wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:06:09 +0100
Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
The anon-inner class still keeps a reference to the previous page.
Yes, I know, that's how anonymous classes work. I
Hi,
seems to me you should probably use sticky sessions in your
loadbalancer ;-)
I think if your resource depends on instance variables in your Page you
really need to do that. If you just depend on stuff happening in the
initialization of the Page class (not an instance) you could use an
interpolating implementation.
Is there a simpler way for this?
Best regards
Chris
On 12/09/2010 11:48 AM, Carl-Eric Menzel wrote:
Hi,
seems to me you should probably use sticky sessions in your
loadbalancer ;-)
I think if your resource depends on instance variables in your Page
you
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:21:47 -0600
Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Not really. You could have dynamic resources referenced in your
constructor that depend on instance variables, or the model that was
passed into the constructor, etc For anything that doesn't need
that,
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:49:32 -0500
James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Are you moving a field from one form to another? But that does
change the semantics, doesn't it? If it doesn't, why are there two
forms?
Both forms edit one particular object (say a Person). They just
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:17:38 -0800
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
i wonder if queuing can actually replace icomponentresolver and
auto-adding. i wonder if after onbeforerender we can do what unqueing
does now, parse the markup, find any missing components, and insert
them.
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:16:00 -0800
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
the difficult part is that doing this to complex pages is...difficult.
in the example above it is easy to see the two components that need to
be renested. but, in complex pages there can be 20 components that
need
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 07:31:28 -0500
James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Carl-Eric Menzel
cmen...@wicketbuch.de wrote:
So either there is a difference between the forms (different submit
method maybe?), then this move would make a semantic
Hi,
no offense meant, but the rhetoric in this thread is getting more and
more ridiculous. Chicken? Component hierarchy hell? Seriously? At
most maybe component hierarchy slight annoyance.
I am not at all convinced that this is a good idea. In my opinion, one
of the strongest and best points
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 10:20:12 +0200
Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
I frankly don't see any way to have this auto-hierarchy stuff
without getting lots of unnecessary ambiguity and sources of bugs. I
totally agree with what Eelco wrote below, and what someone else
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 10:23:27 +0200
Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Hi!
So far, I have often heard about people not liking the requirement
to match the code hierarchy in the markup. Most (not all!) of them
have never actually used Wicket (I know this doesn't apply
This is pretty much exactly what I'd do given such a requirement.
If something is so different as to require a different internal
hierarchy, it's no longer the same component. Make a new component and
use standard OO techniques for code reuse, like Frank wrote here.
This certainly is not worth
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:21:46 +0200
Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Here we finally come to an actual argument about this:
Panel is not reusable enough because it has its own markup. If I
override its markup, it stops working.
Frank wrote in another message how to deal
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:01:28 +0200
Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Hi!
Coding friction? Yes. Every time I need to look at somebody else's
code and try to figure out what exactly they did.
Ah.. so you are trying to solve your problem probably from the wrong
end?
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 10:05:39 -0500
James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I think we need to try to put our heads together on this one. I don't
necessarily think this approach is the best, but I haven't really had
a chance to wrap my head around it yet, frankly. Do we really think
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:23:18 +0200
Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
So instead of asking, How can we make Wicket different so that my
problem will go away? the proper question to try first is, What
is the Wicket way of solving my problem?
That's not how proggress
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:46:13 +0200
Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
@Carl-Erik
Reason why I haven't commented your enabledInHierarchy comment is
because it would not afect it in any way.
I hope the proposition will be clear when we have it ready. We are
working on
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 10:51:49 -0500
James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Frank Silbermann
frank.silberm...@fedex.com wrote:
If the component hierarchy can be changed without changing behavior
or semantics, then why are the components in a hierarchy
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 18:04:44 +0200
Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Igor explained that # Components can be queued to any container, and
can only be added to the hierarchy that stems from that container,
thereby solving the security requirement
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:33:31 -0500
James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Say you have two forms on one panel (don't know if this is the best
example or not, but here goes). You want to move a field from one
panel to another. You'd have to do that in code with the traditional
Hi Wicket devs and users,
I'm proud to announce the release of our new german-language Wicket
book:
Wicket: Komponentenbasierte Webanwendungen in Java by Roland Förther,
Carl-Eric Menzel and Olaf Siefart. Published by dpunkt Verlag (many
thanks to René Schönfeldt and the others at dpunkt). More
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:54:29 +0200
Martijn Dashorst dasho...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache Wicket project is proud to announce the release of Apache
Wicket 1.4.
Congratulations to the team and all contributors, and a big thank you!
Carl-Eric
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:00:04 +0300
Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
No. It crashes. Restart your browser and you will see.
Works for me.
Carl-Eric
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1
I fully agree. Conversation scope is a kludge for a broken model, and in
the end nothing more than a specialized form of global variables.
Just put your state into the appropriate page or component instances
and/or models, and you get *any* scope you need, for free.
Carl-Eric
On Thu, 18
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:21:36 -0400
James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I fully agree. Conversation scope is a kludge for a broken model,
and in the end nothing more than a specialized form of global
variables.
To which model are you referring?
Not a model in the Wicket
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:10:33 -0400
James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Carl-Eric Menzel
cm.wic...@users.bitforce.com wrote:
Then you already have an object that your components can work on.
Put that in a Wicket model and enjoy. My point
Hi,
when creating a fresh Wicket project with the following line as
generated by the quickstart page on wicket.apache.org:
mvn archetype:create -DarchetypeGroupId=org.apache.wicket
-DarchetypeArtifactId=wicket-archetype-quickstart
-DarchetypeVersion=1.4-rc4 -DgroupId=com.mycompany
On Tue, 26 May 2009 16:27:18 +0200
Dorothée Giernoth dorothee.giern...@kds-kg.de wrote:
Now I want to write the changed information from these labels back
into the database after the content has changed. Wouldn't be too much
of a problem if I knew how to retrieve the changed value from the
On Tue, 26 May 2009 08:31:04 -0700
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
go to preferences/compiler/building/output folder and remove *.html
from Filtered Resources list.
I know that :-) I was proposing making this the default in
the archetype.
test is for tests :)
the proper way
On Tue, 26 May 2009 08:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
Juan Carlos Garcia M. jcgarc...@gmail.com wrote:
[MECLIPSE ticket and workaround]
Hope this help.
Yes it does, thank you.
Carl-Eric
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Both Login and CurrentProfile are subclasses of Panel. When the
login form is submitted or the logout link is submitted, in order to
get the page to re-render, I had to use this code:
setResponsePage(getPage().getClass());
In this case the page isn't re-rendered, it is re-created, i.e. a
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
