Wicket-Bootstrap and
choose a sexy Bootstrap template to make them all look really awesome
and 2020s-ish ;) I realize that the purpose of examples is to, mainly,
demostrate usage of particular Wicket components but it certainly
wouldn't hurt if the examples looked sexy and modern.
Regards,
Chris Colman
e for this.
Thanks,
Stan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Regards,
Chris Colman
*Feezily*,
A product of /Step Ahead/ *Software* Pty Ltd
Web: feezily.com.au <h
ery interested in how to optimize for this.
Thanks,
Stan
--
Regards,
Chris Colman
*Feezily*,
A product of /Step Ahead/ *Software* Pty Ltd
Web: feezily.com.au <http://feezily.com.au> Em: chr...@stepahead.com.au
Ph: 02 9656 1278
I also want to thank you, Jonathan, for Wicket (and the other early devs
who conceived it and the current devs maintaining it) - we've been using
it since 2008.
It's always my first choice for any new web app development but on some
client contracts I have had to work with existing apps using
Hi Vahid,
This feature has been requested multiple times in the Wicket's long history.
There have even been times where implementations of this feature have
been developed but unfortunately not added to the Wicket code base,
apparently due to backwards compatibility issues but I believe there
On 13/09/2021 5:19 pm, Martin Grigorov wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 9:44 AM Martin Grigorov
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 9:27 AM Chris Colman
wrote:
You shouldn't use if you use EnclosureContainer.
Use a instead.
It's weird how it's worked perfectly for many years for us
You shouldn't use if you use EnclosureContainer.
Use a instead.
It's weird how it's worked perfectly for many years for us in Wicket 6.x.
Maybe an extra note could be added to the 6.x -> 7.x migration guide in
case others experience this in their migration efforts.
Regards,
Chris
instead of wicket:enclosure:
Title
With the above markup the Wicket 6.x Java code works unchanged in Wicket 7.x
On 12/09/2021 11:30 am, Chris Colman wrote:
We're in the middle of migrating a large enterprise content management
system (>1000 UI classes) from 6.x to
We're in the middle of migrating a large enterprise content management
system (>1000 UI classes) from 6.x to 7.x.
We've finally got it compiling with Wicket 7.x but we're having an issue
with an EnclosureContainer that worked fine in Wicket 6.x.
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException:
he short term at least, as ModalWindow is deprecated and not
removed, existing ModalX code will continue to work fine in Wicket 9.
Regards,
Chris
On 9/04/2021 2:20 pm, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 6:39 AM Chris Colman wrote:
I have just noticed in Wicket 9 that ModalWi
I have just noticed in Wicket 9 that ModalWindow has been deprecated and
replaced by ModalDialog (which sounds pretty good)
It is possible to stack ModalDialogS like we could stack ModalWindowS?
e.g. In a page a user opens a parent modal that has a "Details" button,
which, when clicked, pops
Tomcat, and presumably other JEE app containers, now allow the
specification of the name of the JSESSIONID parameter to use in the URL
(even though cookies are largely used in place of this the initial hit
on a web site will include the jsessionid parameter by default)
This is done by setting
Hi Gabriel,
I've got it working - partially.
I needed to convert my form to full AJAX.
I also finally did a proper translation of the French comments and
realized that I needed to add the this to the AjaxSubmitLink button that
submits the form:
@Override
protected
Hi Gabriel,
This looks promising! I'm just starting to integrate it now.
(I never thought my high school French lessons would come in handy but
they help me understand your comments - a bit :) )
Do you have any usage doco or sample app?
I'm guessing we just construct your captcha validator
We've been doing "Java side" dynamic for some time.
Key Java components override a createComponent(String tagId) method that
will create a Java component on demand.
The "demand" is dictated by the markup. So we can dynamically
reconfigure markup to dictate the assembly of Wicket components
Hi Gabriel,
I'm using Wicket 6.x - should your Recaptcha validator work for that?
On 29/01/2020 8:53 am, Gabriel Landon wrote:
Hi Chrisco,
It's far from perfect, but here's a good start :
AjaxRecaptchaV3Validator.java
Does anyone know if anyone has already created a Wicket component that
encapsulates Google reCAPTCHA V3?
I'm thinking it should be possible to have such a component that is
simply added to a form like any other form component and then at
submission, if Google thinks it's a Bot then the
5:40 pm, Chris Colman wrote:
Sorry for the duplication. These messages did not appear in the mail
group until about 8 hours after they were posted. I thought I must
have 'misdirected' the first one. Was there a problem with the mail
group today?
Anyway - I eventually worked out how to do
Sorry for the duplication. These messages did not appear in the mail
group until about 8 hours after they were posted. I thought I must have
'misdirected' the first one. Was there a problem with the mail group today?
Anyway - I eventually worked out how to do it!
The secret was in the source
I have a UI layout where selection changes in one component need to
result in a complete repopulation of the nodes in an associated NestedTree.
Obviously I don't want to do a complete page refresh so I was wondering
what the best way is to do an AJAX refresh of the entire NestedTree
after
We're using a DataGridView and we're happily doing partial updates of
existing items for select/deselect and when content changes.
Updating existing items is fine because we can work out the changed Item
(Component) and just add it to the AJAX request target.
However, we're wondering if it's
;>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6638</a>
>
> Wicket 6.x receives only security related fixes and this one doesn't
count
> as such.
> You will have to use HttpServletResponse in your application.
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:09 PM Chris Colman
}
} catch (IOException var3) {
throw new WicketRuntimeException(var3);
}
}
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Colman [<a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com">mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com</a>
thinking that may I could use SC_TEMPORARY_REDIRECT instead
but that results in a:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Status must be either 301, 302 or 303,
but was: 307
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 27 February 201
then Wicket will not do its extra
logic
> in
>
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ServletWebResponse#encodeRedirec
tU
> RL()
> and all should be fine.
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:13 PM Chris Colman
>
> wrote:
>
> > I am using:
> >
> >
> >
> > throw new R
I am using:
throw new RedirectUrlException(externalUrl);
to redirect to an external URL (i.e.
https://hostname/path?param1=value1=value2 etc.,)
In constructing the URL I have used java.net.URLEncoder.encode() to
individual encode the values in each of the query parameters.
Wow, that looks amazing!
Which component are you using to display the source code - it looks very
nice.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robin Shen [mailto:ro...@pmease.com]
> Sent: Monday, 7 January 2019 10:25 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: An open source git server written
We use modals extensively in one of our apps that uses Wicket 6.x but
the HTML rendered is obviously not tailored for bootstrap and so the
modal does not act responsively (responsibly :) ) on smaller devices.
I'm aware of the excellent Wicket - Bootstrap library (as we use that on
another
t;
> Have fun
> Sven
>
>
> Am 18.06.2018 um 22:11 schrieb Chris Colman:
> > Is a single ajaxtarget.add(outerWebMarkupContainer)
> sufficient or do I
> > somehow have to locate the inner WebMarkupContainer in the
> right hand
> > cell in the new row and a
> I don't see a reason why your challenge shouldn't work.
>
> What happens if you reload the page (F5) after adding via
> Ajax? Do the missing cells show up?
>
> Have fun
> Sven
>
>
>
> Am 18.06.2018 um 21:26 schrieb Chris Colman:
> > I have an int
fun
> Sven
>
>
>
> Am 18.06.2018 um 21:26 schrieb Chris Colman:
> > I have an interesting List related challenge - I'm using
> > RefreshingView and having trouble when adding new rows.
> >
> > The problem is a repeating view within a repeating vie
hy your challenge shouldn't work.
>
> What happens if you reload the page (F5) after adding via
> Ajax? Do the missing cells show up?
>
> Have fun
> Sven
>
>
>
> Am 18.06.2018 um 21:26 schrieb Chris Colman:
> > I have an interesting List related challenge
I have an interesting List related challenge - I'm using RefreshingView
and having trouble when adding new rows.
The problem is a repeating view within a repeating view
i.e.
I have a table with two columns.
Each row is populated by the RefreshingView.
The cells in the right hand column contain
I just noticed this link is also down at the moment:
http://examples6x.wicket.apache.org/ajax/tabbed-panel
but if you go to:
http://examples6x.wicket.apache.org/wicket-examples/index.html
and click 'Ajax' then 'Tabbed Panel' you arrive a working tabbed-panel
page:
:)
>
> WBR, Maxim
> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>
> On Oct 13, 2017 01:05, "Chris Colman" <chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > > Yes, this is known.
> > >
> > > We work on the new hosting - a VM ma
> Yes, this is known.
>
> We work on the new hosting - a VM managed by Apache Infra.
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > https://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/app
> > connection is not secure
> >
> > https://examples6x.wicket.apache.org/app
> > connection is not secure
If you need to secure a site via https to
Recently I mentioned Wicket to a product manager - and his reply indicated that
he thought Wicket was for UI's but was actually a different programming
language! I quickly pointed out that it's the SAME language as they've used
forever - Java! And that's the point! You can build your domain
FireFox doesn't seem to handle.
So by specifying a mount path for the login page or by using (the proper
approach) continueToOriginalDestination() to return after intercept then the
problem does not occur.
> -----Original Message-
> From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com]
directToInterceptPage.
but when the action URL is generated after a "continue after intercept" to a
page that is mounted at '/' then the action URL is generated with the ..?
prefix instead of ./?.
While Chrome can handle ..? it appears Firefox does not but works fine wit
h the quickstart?
>
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
> > Von: "Chris Colman" <chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com>
> > An: users@wicket.apache.org
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Oktober 2017 10:06:23
> > Betreff: RE: AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior not trigg
hese JS script resources?
> Maybe you want to publish the quickstart?
>
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
> > Von: "Chris Colman" <chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com>
> > An: users@wicket.apache.org
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Oktober 2017 10:06:23
> > Betreff
the wicket jQuery with an empty.js resource or even pull in the bootstrap
> one instead (e.g.: bootstrap script file instead of wickets jquery only
> script), so only 1 jQuery gets executed. Also the migrate you use is quite
> old, I would suggest 1.4.1;
>
> Best,
>
>
.js resource or even pull in the bootstrap
> one instead (e.g.: bootstrap script file instead of wickets jquery only
> script), so only 1 jQuery gets executed. Also the migrate you use is quite
> old, I would suggest 1.4.1;
>
> Best,
>
> KB
>
>
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
I've made some progress. I have created a cut down app that produces a
similar page to the troublesome one in the large app that exhibits the
problem - except I can't make the cut down app exhibit the problem yet
;)
... but I have found a suble difference between the two apps:
It seems to be
I also believe Wicket could really benefit from marketing.
Some real world experiences/comparisons could be useful to add to any marketing
efforts:
After working on Wicket projects since 2008 in a recent contract I had to use
Angular JS in a project - OMG!!! It was as painful as pulling teeth
gt; Subject: Re: AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior not triggering
ListChoice
> model update in Firefox in Wicket 7.9.0
>
> Hi,
>
> I've tried your code but everything works fine. Maybe your FF has an
add-
> on
> that causes the problem ?
>
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Ch
pdatingBehavior not triggering
ListChoice
> model update in Firefox in Wicket 7.9.0
>
> Hi,
>
> I've tried your code but everything works fine. Maybe your FF has an
add-
> on
> that causes the problem ?
>
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Chris Colman
> <chr...@ste
I also tried it without the leading 'on' in 'onchange'
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com]
> Sent: Friday, 6 October 2017 10:12 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior not triggering L
I have a ListChoice with a ProperyModel and I have added a
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior to cause the model object to be
updated 'live' (i.e. whenever the selection is changed rather than
waiting for form submit) via:
myListChoice.add(new
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior("onchange")
Given that I rave about Wicket so much to most of the developers at one
of my clients I was asked to give a presentation on the benefits of
Wicket to the Java development team.
Does anyone know of an up to date (Wicket 6) slide presentation or
similar that I could use for this?
I could create my
-2010).
Martijn
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
Given that I rave about Wicket so much to most of the developers at
one
of my clients I was asked to give a presentation on the benefits of
Wicket to the Java development team.
Does anyone know
Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com
wrote:
Here's a solution to the clirr problem that should continue to work
on
OSes with a different slant (/) on life ;) (BTW all of our servers
it
(unless it breaks the less-problematic OS-es)
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com
wrote:
There is a comment about this issue in the parent pom.xml.
For anyone else
-5836
kind regards
Tobias
Am 13.02.15 um 18:43 schrieb Chris Colman:
I'm compiling on Windows 8.1 64bit if that makes any difference.
A few years ago there was an issue with clirr due to a forward
slash/backslash issue which caused it to compile ok on Linux/Mac but
fail on Windows
.
https://github.com/apache/wicket/commits/wicket-6.x/wicket-
core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/feedback/FeedbackCollector.java
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com
wrote
I pulled it from git.
I'm trying to compile while on the 6.19.0 branch.
Regards,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Del Bene [mailto:an.delb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2015 11:21 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Error building wicket-6.19.0 from src
in a
ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5836
kind regards
Tobias
Am 13.02.15 um 18:43 schrieb Chris Colman:
I'm compiling on Windows 8.1 64bit if that makes any difference.
A few years ago there was an issue with clirr due to a forward
slash/backslash issue which
, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com
wrote:
Unfortunately that wasn't it!
I uninstalled Java 1.8 and reverted to Java 1.7.0_55 and the same
problem occurs.
I switched to the 6.x branch (currently 6.20.0) and it still occurs.
-Original Message
Unfortunately that wasn't it!
I uninstalled Java 1.8 and reverted to Java 1.7.0_55 and the same
problem occurs.
I switched to the 6.x branch (currently 6.20.0) and it still occurs.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com]
Sent: Saturday, 14 February
I get the following error when I try to compile the 6.19.0 source code:
[ERROR] 7014: org.apache.wicket.feedback.FeedbackCollector: Method
'public java.util.List collect()' is now final
[ERROR] 7014: org.apache.wicket.feedback.FeedbackCollector: Method
'public java.util.List
Up to version 6.12.0 we were not seeing any session being established
when static resources were being requested - which is desirable because
often search engines will hit thousands of times a day and most don't
use cookies or session rewriting so we end up creating a new session for
every static
I think the very first priority now is to decide which Github
repository
should be the official one for this task. I think this should be
Martijn's repository merged with all the changes made by Chris.
I agree: Chris J Lee's changes integrate Foundation which I have found
to be an excellent
I think a multi phase approach might have more chance of success - as
I
said in my immediate previous post if we could live with jekyll
source
for phase one (even though it may not be ideal) then we can keep most
of
the current content source 'as is' and simply choose a decent modern
much.
--
Guillaume
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
I think a multi phase approach might have more chance of success -
as
I
said in my immediate previous post if we could live with jekyll
source
for phase one (even though it may not be ideal
://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-flat/
It's clean and has personnality.
The only thing IMHO is that a one page design for this amount of
information is perhaps a bit too much.
--
Guillaume
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
I think a multi phase
Wow! Martijn has already done what I was suggesting we already do -
except I was proposing Bootstrap but Martijn's work looks excellent with
whatever CSS it's using.
I didn't realize that there was such an active JIRA already covering
this.
So this worries me - why isn't Martijn's work live
Sorry, for the confusion - I realize now that I was referring to Chris J
Lee's fork of Martijn's work.
I cloned Chris J Lee's fork and ran Jekyll on it and looks very modern
and sexy indeed.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com]
Sent: Saturday, 15
/limitations.
Regards,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, 12 November 2014 7:21 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicke website makeover time?
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com
at 9:45 AM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com
wrote:
Hi fellow wicketeers!
We all know that Wicket has to be the most awesome and productive
Java
UI framework around but I am worried when I point new clients to the
Wicket website because it's look and feel is possibly a little dated
workflow...
Martijn
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Martin Grigorov
mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com
wrote:
Hi fellow wicketeers!
We all know that Wicket has to be the most awesome and productive
Hi fellow wicketeers!
We all know that Wicket has to be the most awesome and productive Java
UI framework around but I am worried when I point new clients to the
Wicket website because it's look and feel is possibly a little dated or
'2007ish style'.
I feel like the look and feel of the Wicket
in this 'generic' way.
Is there any work around for this?
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Pagebloom Team Leader,
Step Ahead Software
pagebloom - your business your website growing together
Sydney: (+61 2) 9656 1278 Canberra: (+61 2) 6100 2120
Email: chr...@stepahead.com.au mailto
either use LESS/SASS to generate different rules for the
different
screens or with CSS media queries.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote:
We are using Wicket with Bootstrap which is fine except for modal
We are using Wicket with Bootstrap which is fine except for modal
window.
With Wicket it appears as though the modal window provides all the
markup for the out modal 'window'. We can provide HTML for the panels
within that but the outer modal seems to be Wicket generated.
This seems to be
,
getJavaScriptLibrarySettings().setJQueryReference(new
UrlResourceReference(some url))
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote:
What is involved in telling wicket to fetch its js (jquery etc) from
a
different server
What is involved in telling wicket to fetch its js (jquery etc) from a
different server. It doesn't have to be a true CDN server just a
different server to the one the wicket app is running on.
Would this require using wicket-cdn or is there an easy way to just tell
wicket to fetch its js from a
implementation to this:
http://techblog.molindo.at/2011/03/serving-wicket-resources-from-cdn.ht
ml
Regards,
Jan
Von: Chris Colman [chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. April 2013 19:27
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Serving wicket JS from
ModalX allows you to create set of 'generic' modal windows waiting in
the wings ready for display.
Any specific modal that you want simply needs to derive from a generic
modal class and you can then open it at will.
See here for info and demo:
visits to other websites in the wicketsphere would require no download.
Caching of these common, static resources would reduce the bandwidth
usage/traffic on the webservers hosting wicket sites.
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Pagebloom Team Leader,
Step Ahead Software
pagebloom - your
in my app's base
panel class so that all panels are automagically affected but I
discovered that getRenderBodyOnly is marked as final in the framework.
Is there any reason for this? It could be really useful to override
this.
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Pagebloom Team Leader,
Step Ahead
Chris Colman:
I've come across a HTML/CSS template that is sensitive to the spans
wicket places in various places and would like to do a global remove
of these but don't want to have to call setRenderBodyOnly(true) on
every component if I can avoid it.
I thought that maybe I could override
I'm interested in doing a slight change to the way Wicket resolved
markup files in regard to varation, style and locale.
Is the algorithm that implements this markup resolution process provided
via a pluggable interface or is it hard coded into the framework?
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
interface or is it hard coded into the
framework?
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Pagebloom Team Leader,
Step Ahead Software
pagebloom - your business your website growing together
Sydney:(+61 2) 9656 1278 Canberra: (+61 2) 6100 2120
Email: chr...@stepahead.com.au mailto://chr
in regard to varation, style and locale.
Is the algorithm that implements this markup resolution process
provided via a pluggable interface or is it hard coded into the
framework?
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Pagebloom Team Leader,
Step Ahead Software
pagebloom - your business your
Wicket is probably the best most of us have ever enjoyed before. but
let's be realistic, there's the nice paradox of non competitive
presentation of this presentation framework yet, to be sold to not
enough tech skilled people, who are decision makers. they just want
to see nice cinema. then, why
your loosing the focus pretended to be justify before: marketing,
not tech. and many people first see, later think :)
I think the problem is that most good software engineers see 'beauty' in
the elegant component based, object oriented architecture of Wicket - we
can all go oooh and h just
Webapps are excellent candidates for injecting into the 'thread' rather
than providing every injectable class with its own special constructor
(a lot of boring, mechanical work and problem not as run time efficient)
and then setting up XML or annotations to configure the inject
mechanisms.
A
If there currently is no session it won't create one - auto creating a
session is undesirable in many cases - e.g. when serving up a static
resource.
-Original Message-
From: Raul [mailto:ralva...@netwie.com]
Sent: Friday, 25 January 2013 6:08 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject:
This looks very similar to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4920
Which was I thought was fixed but might have been unfixed ;)
Regards,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, 19 January 2013 2:02 AM
To:
hi,
add your IRequestCycleListener which onexception checks if it's the
exception you want to
log/mail ,if it's then do so.
Ah! That looks like what I need!
Thanks.
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
When running in production mode and an error
I'm pretty sure a single thread is used to service the HTTP request that
results in the rendering of the page so I would expect LDMs to be loaded
sequentially.
-Original Message-
From: Hendy Irawan [mailto:he...@soluvas.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 25 December 2012 1:00 PM
To:
Josh,
We run the same kind of app, and what we did is simply consume the
X-Forwarded-Host in the app server (see
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html#x-headers).
That way the url - website ID lookup is handled in the app itself.
We have an IP especially for this app, and have set
)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:447)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
);
+ }
+ return null;
}
Your particular stacktrace below should no longer trigger the creation
of a session now.
Sven
On 12/23/2012 02:05 PM, Chris Colman wrote:
A while ago when working with Wicket 1.5 we raised issue 4334 that
dealt
I thought anything EJB was taken off the menu years ago to stop people
getting very sick - Doctor's orders ;)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, 21 December 2012 11:42 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: JPA annotations
Hi,
The
, at 20:31, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com
wrote:
Jira says this has been fixed but I can't, as yet, see any changed on
github master branch that have any core code changes that may have
fixed
this.
Are the changes still in progress?
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Jesus
actually used mountPackage to mount
the
private page.
Thanks,
Jesus M.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Sven Meier s...@meiers.net wrote:
Hi Nick,
WICKET-4920 might be related. Please create a quickstart showing the
problem.
Thanks
Sven
On 12/19/2012 06:39 AM, Chris Colman wrote:
I
Got the changes now, thanks Sven!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com]
Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2012 6:32 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Wicket 6.4.0 Session/URL bug?
Jira says this has been fixed but I can't, as yet, see any changed
I have seen this exact same issue.
I first saw it after I reported the, possibly related, bug:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4920
and then was verifying that it was fixed.
I only noticed the bug you describe after I built with a version of
Wicket that included the above fix. I'm
Looks good. I can see some very handy uses for drag and drop.
-Original Message-
From: Sven Meier [mailto:s...@meiers.net]
Sent: Thursday, 13 December 2012 7:09 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: [ANN] wicket-dnd now ready for Wicket 6
Hi all,
I've migrated wicket-dnd, the
1 - 100 of 592 matches
Mail list logo
