Is the Wicket Ajax Next Generation work going into 1.5?
Also, is there plans for an event bus, sort of like what you see in Jonathan
Locke's 26 wicket tricks source code? I've seen some really nice use of
event bus in GWT that I think Wicket could benefit from.
-Richard
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at
One way is to make your Client area a Wicket Panel and make your nav links
extend AjaxLink (or AjaxFallbackLink), then add the Client Panel to the
AjaxRequestTarget in your implemented AjaxLink.onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)
method. Note, the components you add to the AjaxRequestTarget must have
Also, this explains the example:
http://wicket.apache.org/exampleajaxcounter.html
2009/10/13 Richard Allen richard.l.al...@gmail.com
One way is to make your Client area a Wicket Panel and make your nav
links extend AjaxLink (or AjaxFallbackLink), then add the Client Panel
Now that Oracle bought Sun I wonder if JDev and Netbeans will cross paths.
A great free, cross-platform SQL tool is SQuirreL (
http://squirrel-sql.sourceforge.net/).
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Scott Swank scott.sw...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm at best 50% DBA, by training. You end up with
To make Luther's point more explicit:
Wicket allows you to bundle everything a Wicket component needs (Java code,
HTML, CSS, images, etc.) into a single JAR and drop that JAR into the
WEB-INF/lib directory of any WAR, thereby making the JAR essentially
self-contained and reusable. The benefit
If you are using packagingwar/packaging, then the maven-war-plugin will
automatically pick up the resources in src/main/webapp, which means you do
not have to configure that directory as a resource. Additionally, the
maven-resources-plugin automatically picks up resources in
src/main/resources, so
I believe you want to use ContextRelativeResource. See:
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/1.4/index.html?org/apache/wicket/resource/ContextRelativeResource.html
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Eyal Golan egola...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've been looking for an answer but couldn't find it.
We
Here is a good intro to OSGi:
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-03-2008/jw-03-osgi1.html
Here is one framework for running Wicket in OSGi:
http://www.ops4j.org/projects/pax/wicket/
Here is a project that integrates Guice, Wicket, Hibernate, and OSGi:
http://code.google.com/p/modulefusion/
with
that too. However, given that we're struggling to get all the bugs
fixed in 1.3.6 and 1.4, I find it hard to believe that anyone will
have the time and energy to do the mentoring as well. I don't have
that time and energy.
Martijn
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Richard Allen
richard.l.al
I think when/if Eclipse supports nested projects, that might help.
Eclipse.org appears to be working on it for version 4. See:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=35973
I have also ran into problems with m2eclipse, however I have kept it
installed for use with small projects and for the
I did some reading and found that a mentoring organization for the GSoC is
considered A group running an active free/open source software project.
That seems to imply a core committer would need to be involved. See:
The words of C. Bergstrom may have been poorly chosen, but he seems to have
the same goal of wanting Wicket to succeed and grow in popularity. Providing
harsh responses to users that, despite poor communication, are otherwise
excited about your project does not help to grow your community or get
Sure.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:45 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
If your on it Richard, could you put in the wicket merchandise shop aswell?
cafepress.com/apachewicket
2009/2/19 Richard Allen richard.l.al...@gmail.com
I like the wickethub.org idea! Thank you
True. And I have no problem with that. I'll update the wiki with what I know
before the end of the week.
However, I believe the good management of projects is in large part what
makes them a success.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
Most
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Richard Allen
richard.l.al...@gmail.com wrote:
True. And I have no problem with that. I'll update the wiki with what I
know
before the end of the week.
However, I believe the good management of projects is in large part what
makes them a success
That is very interesting. We have divided our web applications into
modules, which are essentially mini WARs that are merged in the build
process to make the final deployed WAR. This allows us to share these
modules among various web applications, which helps with code reuse and
maintainability.
See: http://code.google.com/p/wicket-ext/
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Hoover, William whoo...@nemours.orgwrote:
Is there any active projects for Wicket and ExtJS out there? I know of
the one that used to be at wickettools.org, but it looks like a dead
project (no updates for over a
The only time I have seen something under the target folder added as a
source folder in Eclipse is if it specifically configured that way in the
build section of the pom.xml. This is sometimes done if you are generating
sources or resources using something like JAXB, e.g.,
Using m2eclipse, you can also create a new Maven project using an archetype
from within Eclipse. Choose File New Maven Project Next, and select
the archetype you want to use. See:
http://books.sonatype.com/maven-book/reference/eclipse-sect-m2e-create-archetype.html
-Richard
On Fri, Jan 16,
See: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/calling-wicket-from-javascript.html
Or more generally: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/ajax.html
-Richard
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Sniffer cajic_aleksan...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanx, I think I understand you, but still I'm not sure how to contribute
What I don't like about Wicket is, that it is like writing normal Java
applications - although rich clients applications are being replaced with
web-based solutions and there is a fundamental difference between
web-applications and normal java applications. If you have a java
application as
The url-pattern only supports using a wildcard at the end of the pattern
(e.g., /myapp/*) or as a extension mapping prefix (e.g., *.do). See
section SRV.11.2 of the servlet specification, which can be downloaded from
here:
http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr154/index.html
For integration between Ext JS and Wicket, check out:
http://code.google.com/p/wicket-ext/
http://www.wickettools.org/index.php/extjs-integration
-Richard
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Cédric Thiébault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Yes I was thinking about something like this but with more
What about just starting with Google Sites:
http://www.google.com/sites/overview.html ?
It's free and easy. Good for a static website, which sounds like what you
are looking to produce.
-Richard
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:05 AM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Take a look at Joomla 1.5
Brix (http://code.google.com/p/brix-cms/). But it's new and not as feature
rich as something like Joomla.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Where is the Wicket solution!
If ExtJS essentially gives you what you want in the way of widgets, why not
look into integration of ExtJS and Wicket? In the near future, we will be
migrating our applications that use ExtJS to Wicket. There has already been
some work done in this area. See the following links.
ExtJS 2.2:
Also, can you share what you get from Wicket that you don't get from GWT?
That would be useful for those who venture on this list considering GWT
versus Wicket.
Thanks,
Richard
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Richard Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
If ExtJS essentially gives you what you want
I think a better solution is to make the browser's back/forward buttons have
the same effect as clicking on the 'Previous Question'/'Next Question'
buttons. If you put effort into making that work instead of putting your
effort into trying to disable the browser's back/forward buttons, then you
the effort,
then that would help. The amount of work involved in integrating ExtJS 2.2
with Wicket is part of our new web framework evaluation criteria.
Thanks,
Richard Allen
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought there were
Paolo,
Is this an open source effort? What version of ExtJS are you using?
If we were to choose to go with Wicket, we would be willing to contribute.
Thanks,
Richard Allen
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Paolo Di Tommaso
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on a wicket-ext integration
the project could be hosted? Google code?
and any idea about the licence?
Thank you, Paolo
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Richard Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Paolo,
Is this an open source effort? What version of ExtJS are you using?
If we were to choose to go with Wicket, we would
/index.php/extjs-integrationm, which is version
0.1.0, published in February 2008.
Is the wicket-tools-extjs project in active development or was that project
abandoned? Is there any other significant work undergoing to integrate
Wicket and Ext JS?
Thanks,
Richard Allen
with sites using Wicket:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/sites-using-wicket.html
Also, the Wicket in Action forward by Jonathan Locke mentions that IBM,
TomTom, Nikon, VeriSign, Amazon, and SAS use Wicket.
Thanks,
Richard Allen
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Wicket
Joel,
What advantage does Tapestry 5 provide you over Wicket for your front office
pages?
Thanks,
Richard Allen
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Joel Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're actually using two web frameworks in our application, depending on
the type of page.
Our application
of applications we produce.
My colleague emailed the instructor from SpringSource and asked what he
thought of us migrating to Wicket instead of Spring MVC. His response is
below with my comments inlined. I would appreciate any convincing comments
from Wicket experts.
Thanks,
Richard Allen
Rich,
Some
35 matches
Mail list logo