Re: No matching SeamConversationContext for store type interface javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest, using NOOP instance!

2022-03-23 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi Marco, Wicket 8 contains 2 CDI integration modules: wicket-cdi for CDI 1.0 and wicket-cdi-1.1 for CDI 1.1 and up. I don't know what CDI version is supported by the application servers you mentioned, but CDI 1.0 is rather old and it's likely your server supports 1.1 or higher. If you wish to

Re: OAuth authentication

2022-01-19 Thread Emond Papegaaij
s))) .toString(); } private void apply(RedirectionAction action, JEEContext context) { JEEHttpActionAdapter.INSTANCE.adapt(action, context); } } On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:36 AM Emond Papegaaij wrote: > Hi Boris, > > I would go for pac4j-o

Re: OAuth authentication

2022-01-18 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi Boris, I would go for pac4j-oidc. It does not provide Wicket integration out of the box, but it is very easy to setup and you only need a few lines of code to check the authentication. Perhaps @dashorst can share the code: https://twitter.com/dashorst/status/280001847054336 You can find

CVE-2021-23937: Apache Wicket: DNS proxy and possible amplification attack

2021-05-25 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Description: A DNS proxy and possible amplification attack vulnerability in WebClientInfo of Apache Wicket allows an attacker to trigger arbitrary DNS lookups from the server when the X-Forwarded-For header is not properly sanitized. This DNS lookup can be engineered to overload an internal DNS

Re: getPageClass locks the page

2019-08-13 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi, Some time ago, we faced a similar issue. A custom component accessed pages after they were unlocked, causing stale locks. Back then I filed an issue (WICKET-6558), but haven't had time to implement the fix. Locking pages after commitRequest should be blocked. Best regards, Emond On Tue, Aug

Re: Wicket 8 CsrfPrevention issue

2018-12-23 Thread Emond Papegaaij
warded_for; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $proxy_x_forwarded_proto; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Port $proxy_x_forwarded_port; Best regards, Emond Papegaaij On zaterdag 22 december 2018 12:46:11 CET Chris Turchin wrote: > This might help: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46337253/apac

Re: Wicket 8 CsrfPrevention issue

2018-12-23 Thread Emond Papegaaij
warded_for; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $proxy_x_forwarded_proto; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Port $proxy_x_forwarded_port; Best regards, Emond Papegaaij On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 7:31 PM Chris Turchin wrote: > > This might help: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46337253/apache-rever

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

2018-06-08 Thread Emond Papegaaij
On donderdag 7 juni 2018 17:10:16 CEST Martin Grigorov wrote: > 8.0 is on its way to Maven Central! Thanks for the help with the release Martin, and Thomas thanks for testing! Emond - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

2018-06-07 Thread Emond Papegaaij
some exploratory testing against the current build. I checked > >> Dialog, > >> Autocomplete, Accordion, Slider, Sortable, and Tooltip and all seem to be > >> working at first glance. > >> > >> All my tests pass as well. > >> > >> Best, >

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

2018-06-06 Thread Emond Papegaaij
ttps://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots was cached in > >> the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update > >> interval of sonatype-nexus-snapshots has elapsed or updates are forced -> > >> [Help 1] > >> [ERROR] >

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

2018-06-06 Thread Emond Papegaaij
oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots was cached in > >> the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update > >> interval of sonatype-nexus-snapshots has elapsed or updates are forced -> > >> [Help 1] > >> [ERROR] > > &

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

2018-06-06 Thread Emond Papegaaij
11:36:54 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote: > Hi Emond, > > How can I test this? Did you do a milestone release or do I have to build > from source and push to my local artifact repo? > > Best, > > Thomas > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Emond Papegaaij > wrote: >

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

2018-06-05 Thread Emond Papegaaij
a snapshot build. It works, but the UI API might > change a bit before the 8.0 release. > > Best regards, > Emond Papegaaij > > Op vr 1 jun. 2018 17:36 schreef Thomas Heigl : > > Hi Ernesto, > > > > I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I said

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

2018-06-02 Thread Emond Papegaaij
library. At least the will make it easy to stay up to date with the latest version :) I can't push a release to central, but perhaps Martin can do that when I'm done? For now you can use a snapshot build. It works, but the UI API might change a bit before the 8.0 release. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij

Re: NPE on session invalidation

2018-04-03 Thread Emond Papegaaij
I think it should be enough to change the javadoc. The method returns true when the session was invalidated *during the current request*. Without a request there is no way of telling whether the session is invalidated or not. IMHO throwing an exception is fine, but this behavior should be

Re: Session#invalidateNow() question

2018-03-12 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi, The javadoc states 'Whether the session is invalid now, or will be invalidated by the end of the request.' The first part is no longer true. The javadoc also states that you normally should not need this method (why is it part of the public API then?) I think we can fix the method by

Re: Issues upgrading to Wicket 8.0.0-M9

2018-02-20 Thread Emond Papegaaij
On maandag 19 februari 2018 11:22:30 CET Thomas Heigl wrote: > 1. Current WiQuery version is not compatible with M9 > > It still depends on WicketEventJQueryResourceReference. It would be great > if someone could cut a milestone release for WiQuery as well, so I can do > further testing with my

Re: Performance issue (possible bug since 7.2.0…up to and including 8.0.0-M8)

2017-12-13 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Martin is right. It seems like you found a regression in the changes made for WICKET-6021. In general, the performance was increased by those changes, but evidently not in this case. Please create a JIRA issue and attach a quickstart that shows the problem. That should help us debug this

Re: Possible Issues with Page Store

2017-09-07 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Before you spend another day on troubleshooting again: check WICKET-6457. It's a regression caused by the fix for WICKET-6387 which will cause the pagestore to keep growing on some containers (like wildfly). It is fixed in 7.8.1 which is in the process of being released at this moment. Emond

Re: CsrfPreventionRequestCycleListener Link 400

2016-11-14 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi François, Since 8.0.0-M2 (and 7.5.0) the CsrfPreventionRequestCycleListener will block requests without an Origin and Referer header. The reason for this is that is possible for an attacker to prevent a browser from sending a referer header (for example with rel="noreferrer"). When you open

Re: wicket atmosphere broadcast to all except for orign page

2015-02-24 Thread Emond Papegaaij
The @Subscribe annotation has 2 filter options. In this case, I would go for the first: 'filter()'. The Predicate type you need to specify gets an AtmosphereEvent, where the payload is set to the object you are broadcasted. If you change this object to a little more than just a message, you can

Re: Wicket CDI and Asynchronous (and Websockets)

2015-02-09 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi Sebastien, I did not see any CDI related discussion on dev yet. What needs to be changed to wicket-cdi? Best regards, Emond On Saturday 07 February 2015 21:57:11 Sebastien wrote: Dear all, I think I've now a full working version of my usecase: in EJB/@Asynchronous mode (stateless and

Re: Change in configuring AtmosphereServlet init-params

2015-01-12 Thread Emond Papegaaij
You are right. The filter allows the client to know the length of pushed messages. I believe it was also needed for very long messages. The problem with the default filter was, that the separator was far too common to use for wicket's Ajax responses and the default implementation did not offer

Re: Wicket atmosphere

2014-05-19 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Could you create a JIRA issue for this, so we (and other users) can track this issue? A short sample is not needed, because I can see in the code that this can indeed go wrong. I'll make sure this gets fixed in the next version. Best regards, Emond On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Olivier

Re: Wicket atmosphere

2014-05-16 Thread Emond Papegaaij
I replied to your mail already, but it seems my message was lost in the mail outage. Atmosphere and the JS are upgraded on the wicket-6.x and master branches. I've also fixed the filter. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5589 Best regards, Emond On Monday 05 May 2014 14:08:20

Re: Wicket atmosphere

2014-05-15 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi Duto, I've just pushed the upgrade to the latest version of Atmosphere to the wicket-6.x and master branches. It should be in the next release of wicket- atmosphere for both versions. I've also changed the TrackMessageSizeFilter to extend the atmosphere class. Best regards, Emond On Monday

Re: Wicket CDI 1.1

2014-04-07 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Did you migrate to wicket-cdi-1.1? To inject a non-managed class, use NonContextual.of(MyClass.class).inject(instance). Components, however, are injected by wicket-cdi itself. You should not need to inject those manually. Best regards, Emond Op 4 apr. 2014 20:54 schreef David Beer

Re: Wicket CDI Status

2013-12-10 Thread Emond Papegaaij
. Thank you for your efforts! - Diogo On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@gmail.com wrote: The new module should be fully functional, including all scopes. The performance should be much better than with the old module, due to InjectionTarget caching

Re: Wicket CDI Status

2013-12-05 Thread Emond Papegaaij
RequestScoped. So.. from what I saw in the current version, the biggest problem would be if it was context oriented. Regards, Diogo C. On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Diogo, Please note that wicket-cdi-1.1 is still experimental. I do

Re: Wicket CDI Status

2013-12-04 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Until then, you can test with 0.2-SNAPSHOT. You can find the details for the snapshot repository on our download page. If you find any issues with wicket-cdi-1.1, please file JIRA issues and assign them to me. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Diogo Casado diogocas

Re: [OT] thanks

2013-08-14 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi Pierre, Good to hear you like it! Unfortunately, we are still waiting for the rest of the server stack to support websockets before we can actually use it in production applications. Hopefully, with the release of jee7 (with jsr356) maintainers of httpd and ajp will finally realize they

Re: [OT] thanks

2013-08-14 Thread Emond Papegaaij
, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote: Hi Pierre, Good to hear you like it! Unfortunately, we are still waiting for the rest of the server stack to support websockets before we can actually use it in production applications

Re: wicket-atmosphere EventBus.post throwing Null pointer exception sometime

2013-08-13 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi, As you can see in the ticket, we are unable to reproduce this problem. It is likely to be related to a particular way of using wicket-atmosphere. If you can provide us with a quickstart (you can clone the wicket-atmosphere- quickstart project at

Re: wicket-atmosphere EventBus.post throwing Null pointer exception sometime

2013-08-13 Thread Emond Papegaaij
As you can see in the web.xml, the WicketFilter runs under /app. You can start it in jetty using the maven jetty plugin: mvn jetty:run (which will make the application available under localhost:8080/app) On Tuesday 13 August 2013 03:21:20 souvikbhattacharyas wrote: Hi, I have compiled the

Re: wicket-atmosphere EventBus.post throwing Null pointer exception sometime

2013-08-12 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi, I suggest you try upgrading wicket, wicket-atmosphere and atmosphere to more recent versions first. The version of wicket-atmosphere you are using is almost a year old. The most recent version is 0.12. Several bugs have been fixed since then. Best regards, Emond On Friday 09 August 2013

Re: wicket-atmosphere issues

2013-03-26 Thread Emond Papegaaij
On Monday 25 March 2013 00:59:30 Leonid Bogdanov wrote: Hello! I'm playing with the wicket-atmosphere module and, while generally it works fine, I stumbled upon a couple of issues: 1) Suppose I have a Page with a method marked with @Subscribe annotation, this subscribtion has a

Re: [wicket-atmosphere] Spring Security context while rendering subscribed components

2013-03-18 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi, I'm sorry for the late reply, but I haven't been well last week. Wicket-atmosphere follows the wicket request cycle. Perhaps you can add a RequestCycleListener to setup the context? Keep in mind though that this listener is also called for normal requests. Let me know if this is ok for you.

Re: Another Wicket 6 migration issue: drag and drop (so far done with wiquery)

2013-02-15 Thread Emond Papegaaij
DroppableBehavior is the replacement of DroppableAjaxBehavior. You use it like this: final DroppableBehavior droppableBehavior = new DroppableBehavior(); droppableBehavior.setDropEvent( new AjaxDropCallback() { protected void drop(AjaxRequestTarget target, Component source, Component dropped)

Re: [wicket-atmosphere] resource UUID

2013-01-31 Thread Emond Papegaaij
? Issue a pull-request? Or just let you introduce this tiny bit of code? Thanks for the good, hard work! Regards, Pierre Goupil On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote: You should register it with EventBus.addRegistrationListener and a page

Re: [wicket-atmosphere] atmosphere version

2013-01-11 Thread Emond Papegaaij
-side nor server-side. As I understand things, it should work with any version of Atmosphere starting from 1.0.0, right? Do you have any clue? Regards, Pierre On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote: With recent versions of wicket

Re: [wicket-atmosphere] atmosphere version

2013-01-11 Thread Emond Papegaaij
on this page: https://github.com/Atmosphere/atmosphere/wiki/Enabling-HttpSession-Supportand it works like a charm! Cheers, men! Pierre On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote: Yes, it should work with any 1.0 version. I think you should try to verify

Re: [wicket-atmosphere] resource UUID

2013-01-10 Thread Emond Papegaaij
, Pierre On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Pierre Goupil goupilpie...@gmail.comwrote: Excellent, Emond! I'll try it like you said and tell you what happens. Cheers, Pierre On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote: Hi Pierre

Re: [wicket-atmosphere] atmosphere version

2013-01-10 Thread Emond Papegaaij
With recent versions of wicket-atmosphere, you are required to add this parameter to the AtmosphereServlet: init-param param-nameorg.atmosphere.cpr.broadcastFilterClasses/param-name param-valueorg.apache.wicket.atmosphere.TrackMessageSizeFilter/param- value /init-param Did you

Re: [wicket-atmosphere] resource UUID

2013-01-10 Thread Emond Papegaaij
never called. Is there any more than implementing ResourceRegistrationListener that I'm supposed to do? Regards, Pierre On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote: I've just pushed the fix for WICKET-4957

Re: Wicket Atmosphere does not run in Firefox 17

2013-01-08 Thread Emond Papegaaij
param-valuefalse/param-value /init-param Don't know if there's drawback doing that since it comes as default setting in the quickstart. Regards, Noven From: Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@gmail.com To: users@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket Atmosphere does not run in Firefox 17

2013-01-08 Thread Emond Papegaaij
not work in firefox? I will enable WS back and figure it out how to fix in firefox. Regards, Noven From: Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl To: users@wicket.apache.org; Noven noven_...@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 3:38 PM Subject

Re: [wicket-atmosphere] resource UUID

2013-01-08 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi Pierre, The UUID is bound to a page when atmosphere makes to call back to the server, which makes sense because before then, there is no AtmosphereResource, which means there cannot be a UUID. I think this is a bit of a design flaw, because it is not possible to listen to the registration

Re: Example of wicket atmosphere with channel

2012-12-26 Thread Emond Papegaaij
of some attributes in AtmosphereRequest on which to write your filter, which puts a lot less weight on the server than setting up a RequestCycle. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Noven noven_...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I just saw new features released at wicket 6.40

Re: Wicket Atmosphere does not run in Firefox 17

2012-12-26 Thread Emond Papegaaij
asking this question at their google groups. I've created a ticket (WICKET-4946) for passing parameters to atmosphere, which would allow you to disable websocket. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Noven noven_...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, Thank you for your reply before

Re: Wicket-Atmosphere complex JS

2012-11-13 Thread Emond Papegaaij
This is most likely caused by incorrect escaping, which might be a bug in Wicket or Wicket-Atmosphere. Can you try to create a quickstart to demonstrate the problem and file a Jira ticket? You can use the example application at https://github.com/papegaaij/wicket-atmosphere-quickstart Best

Re: Wicket 6 Atmosphere - where to configure filter-mapping dispatchers?

2012-11-13 Thread Emond Papegaaij
As far as I know, the latest versions of wicket-atmosphere and atmosphere should fall through to the default servlet handling if wicket does not handle the request. I don't know that much about servlet configuration, but I don't think wicket-atmoshpere changes anything in this context. You

Re: Wicket-Atmosphere complex JS

2012-11-13 Thread Emond Papegaaij
the response in chunks. Jean Francois explained in Atmosphere mailing lists that a special Atmosphere has to be used that will collect the whole response before flushing it. On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote: This is most likely caused

Re: HazelCast and Atmosphere Integration with Wicket 6

2012-09-12 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Then you probably didn't register the EventBus in your application's init method. Please take a look at the demo-application I've setup: https://github.com/papegaaij/wicket-atmosphere-quickstart It contains the minimal configuration needed for wicket-atmosphere. Best regards, Emond On

Re: HazelCast and Atmosphere Integration with Wicket 6

2012-09-11 Thread Emond Papegaaij
You will need the application. Without the application, it won't work. There are dozens of ways to pass the application to where you need it. For example, you could inject it using your favorite dependency injection framework, or you could pass it manually to the place where you need it. Best

Re: HazelCast and Atmosphere Integration with Wicket 6

2012-09-11 Thread Emond Papegaaij
You can find all information about Wicket's downloads, repositories and scm on http://wicket.apache.org/start/download.html Best regards, Emond On Tuesday 11 September 2012 04:37:36 esajjkh wrote: Thanks Emond, Where I can find the wicket-atmosphere 0.4-snapshot maven dependency? --

Re: Do I need a custom ResourceAggregator

2012-09-10 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Yes, this is the way to do it. Most of the code in ResourceAggregator is about resolving dependencies and resource bundles. If your DojoRequireHeaderItem is never part of a bundle (which probably is the case), you can skip the 'getItemToBeRendered' part. Best regards, Emond On Sunday 09

Re: HazelCast and Atmosphere Integration with Wicket 6

2012-09-10 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi, I don't know HazelCast, but the problem you are seeing is that EventBus.get() only works when the application is attached to the current thread. You either have to pass a reference to the EventBus to your broadcaster, or, if you have access to the Wicket Application, you can set it on

Re: HazelCast and Atmosphere Integration with Wicket 6

2012-09-10 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi, I just noticed a small error in my advice: the class is not called ThreadLocal but ThreadContext. The idea is very simple: try { ThreadContext.setApplication(application); /* do your thing */ } finally { ThreadContext.setApplication(null); } The problem with this code is that you

Re: Wicket 6.0.0 + Netbeans + Atmosphere

2012-08-27 Thread Emond Papegaaij
You probably did not setup Atmosphere. Wicket-Atmosphere requires Atmosphere to be available in your web application. Please consult the documentation of Atmosphere for instructions. You can also take a look at wicket-examples (especially web.xml and atmosphere.xml), which includes a working

Re: [6.0] wicket-atmosphere

2012-08-09 Thread Emond Papegaaij
We've noticed this problem as well. It only happens on Tomcat. I'm not sure what is going on, but it all starts with Tomcat loosing query parameters on the ws-request (url/?0-1.IBehaviorListener.0- is changed to url). This makes it impossible for wicket to recognize the call to a behavior,

Re: renderHead() / wicket:head page / component order

2012-07-31 Thread Emond Papegaaij
On Monday 30 July 2012 18:18:46 Pierre Goiffon wrote: But one more question though : why rendering wicket:head (in the markup file) contributions before renderHead() (in the java file) contributions ? Seems to me that what you'll put in wicket:head will certainly be some king of static code,

Re: renderHead() / wicket:head page / component order

2012-07-26 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi Pierre, First of all, I strongly recommend you do not use a different HeaderRenderStrategy. It is likely to get removed in future versions of Wicket and might break libraries that depend on the normal HeaderRenderStrategy. Second, I suggest you use Wicket 6, because consistent resource

Re: renderHead() / wicket:head page / component order

2012-07-26 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi Pierre, First of all, I strongly recommend you do not use a different HeaderRenderStrategy. It is likely to get removed in future versions of Wicket and might break libraries that depend on the normal HeaderRenderStrategy. Second, I suggest you use Wicket 6, because consistent resource

Re: wicket (1.5) push with cometd or atmosphere?

2012-07-12 Thread Emond Papegaaij
as I know, this is the only way to do push in Wicket 1.5. Both server and client (js) do not support pushing component updates to the client without initiating an AJAX-call. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij On Thursday 12 July 2012 04:15:52 Decebal Suiu wrote: Hi I want to use a push technology

Re: wicket-atmosphere NullPointerException at initialization

2012-06-13 Thread Emond Papegaaij
of the AtmosphereServlet. Perhaps you forgot to add AtmosphereServlet to your web.xml? AtmosphereServlet loads atmosphere.xml, which in turn fires up the WicketFilter. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij On Wednesday 13 June 2012 13:54:54 heapifyman wrote: I think I had the same problem and was able to overcome

Re: WICKET-1.5.6 Feedback messages not updated on stateless pages

2012-05-07 Thread Emond Papegaaij
I've already created the ticket (WICKET-4536) and committed a fix. Best regards, Emond On Monday 07 May 2012 11:13:22 Martin Grigorov wrote: Hi Thomas, It seems WICKET-4468 broke it somehow. Please file a ticket. On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Thomas Heigl tho...@umschalt.com wrote:

Re: [RELEASE] WASP/SWARM/Wicket security 1.4.1 released, roadmap for future direction

2012-04-19 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Wicket security for 1.4 is no longer maintained and it was never released as part of WicketStuff core. If you want to use wicket security on 1.4, I suggest you build it yourself from https://github.com/dashorst/wicketstuff-security . This is where we put it before adding it to WicketStuff core.

Re: Shrinking the session size, simply by zipping it. Saved my day.

2012-02-20 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Thanks for the suggestion! I've just implemented this. It should be available in 1.5.5 and 6.0.0, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4419 for details. Best regards, Emond On Monday 20 February 2012 10:48:52 Josh Kamau wrote: Thanks for the post. I wish this could be

Re: Any info on wasp-swarm?

2011-12-09 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi Dan, As Martin stated, wicket-security (wasp-swarm) is now part of wicketstuff-core and as such is released for every wicket release. It is maintained and it will continue to work, as all our major applications are built on top of it. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij On Friday 09 December

Re: Firing JavaScript handler on AJAX panel swap

2011-09-26 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi Alec, If you use WiQuery for your javascript-enabled panels, this is done automatically. WiQuery will add the javascript calls in the right places for you. Best regards, Emond On Saturday 24 September 2011 19:58:05 Alec Swan wrote: Hello, We use panel swapping to implement tabbing. The

Re: Announcing the Topicus Dashboard

2010-11-25 Thread Emond Papegaaij
recommend Safari (best with webkit-nightly) or a Chromium daily build. Plain Safari works quite well, but with some minor issues. Google Chrome is able to display the page, but most of the effects do not work well. Emond Papegaaij On Thursday 25 November 2010 01:28:08 Martijn Dashorst wrote

Re: Wicket pages are invalid XHTML

2010-09-16 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi Ichiro, If you want to enforce valid XHTML, take a look at the WicketStuff HTML Validator: http://github.com/dashorst/wicket-stuff-markup-validator It automatically validates all pages served by the application and shows an error report for invalid markup. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij

Re: [announce] Wicket Security 1.4 released!

2010-06-11 Thread Emond Papegaaij
On Wednesday 09 June 2010 21:30:39 ViShap wrote: I just stumbled upon this announce and didn't have the time to dig deep into the code, and the links you suggested don't mention anything, so i have a short question: Is it possible to use annotations instead of that manual hive-file? If

Re: wicket clustering wicket-security

2010-06-03 Thread Emond Papegaaij
On Wednesday 02 June 2010 15:54:50 david_ wrote: Maybe someone knows who I can contact about this? I wicket-security developer maybe? Unfortunately we don't use multiple applications in the same servlet container. So, I can't really help you with this. Maurice probably would have known how to

Re: Status of wicket-security

2010-05-28 Thread Emond Papegaaij
changed since then, because no bugs were found. Emond Papegaaij On Friday 28 May 2010 01:38:54 Jeremy Thomerson wrote: See the second message at this link (the one from Martijn): http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-1-4-upgrade-dependent-on- Wicket-Security-1-4-td2031552.html Jeremy

Re: [PROPOSAL] Application.runAs() Method...

2010-05-28 Thread Emond Papegaaij
On Friday 28 May 2010 15:33:16 Sven Meier wrote: OK, no ITL, got it. Then, you can use that Runnable anywhere to run a task with all of the appropriate Wickety goodness set up for you (except for the request cycle of course because you're not executing within a request cycle). But what

Re: [PROPOSAL] Application.runAs() Method...

2010-05-27 Thread Emond Papegaaij
In our application we use quartz for long running jobs. These threads have access to the application context, which contains the wicket application. In the execute method, we locate the application and use Application.set and Application.unset to set and remove the application. This is,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Application.runAs() Method...

2010-05-27 Thread Emond Papegaaij
On Thursday 27 May 2010 12:41:10 James Carman wrote: On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote: In our application we use quartz for long running jobs. These threads have access to the application context, which contains the wicket application

{Spam?} Re: wicketpath is not valid html

2010-04-28 Thread Emond Papegaaij
(ON/SELENIUM_COMPATIBLE/OFF)? Perhaps this can be implemented in wicket 1.5? On Tuesday 27 April 2010 18:05:48 Igor Vaynberg wrote: turn off the attribute before you run your validator. -igor On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote: Hi, For our project, we

{Spam?} Re: wicketpath is not valid html

2010-04-28 Thread Emond Papegaaij
need yet another configuration option'. Could this please be reconsidered? I like to keep the wicket:path attributes in the generated markup, because they can be very handy for debugging, but I have to disable them to keep the HTML validator happy. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij

wicketpath is not valid html

2010-04-27 Thread Emond Papegaaij
to keep the wicket:path attributes in the generated markup, because they can be very handy for debugging, but I have to disable them to keep the HTML validator happy. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users

Re: Future of Wicket Security (WASP/SWARM)

2010-01-25 Thread Emond Papegaaij
of it, or the other way around (building SWARM on top of Shiro). Perhaps this core security framework can then be integrated into the wicket core. However, I doubt if such a thing can be accomplished for wicket 1.5 (or at all). Best regards, Emond Papegaaij On Monday 25 January 2010 11:11:31 nino martinez

Re: Future of Wicket Security (WASP/SWARM)

2010-01-25 Thread Emond Papegaaij
On Monday 25 January 2010 13:02:05 James Carman wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote: I do think this is a good idea, however it will be difficult to implement. WASP/SWARM already provides this setup. WASP defines the interface, where

Re: Future of Wicket Security (WASP/SWARM)

2010-01-25 Thread Emond Papegaaij
On Monday 25 January 2010 14:31:47 James Carman wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote: That sounds a bit overkill to me. I don't think anyone will ever want to use SWARM in a non-Wicket application. Naturally, this is a bit different

Re: Future of Wicket Security (WASP/SWARM)

2010-01-25 Thread Emond Papegaaij
On Monday 25 January 2010 15:22:42 James Carman wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Emond Papegaaij The current wicket-security code is somewhat limited in what you can do with it. WASP provides a much richer (probably too rich) interface for security. I see WASP as a viable basis

Re: Future of Wicket Security (WASP/SWARM)

2010-01-25 Thread Emond Papegaaij
On Monday 25 January 2010 15:59:53 James Carman wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Emond Papegaaij Most of the complicated stuff is from SWARM, which indeed requires a lot of configuration. The difference between WASP and SWARM is not quite clear from the documentation, nor

Re: [release] Wicket Security 1.4-beta1

2010-01-25 Thread Emond Papegaaij
it or provide a solution in another way. If you do not want to test this commit, you can always stick to beta1, released last week. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij On Thursday 21 January 2010 10:48:36 Emond Papegaaij wrote: Wicket Security 1.4-beta1 has just been released. This release contains all

[release] Wicket Security 1.4-beta1

2010-01-21 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Wicket Security 1.4-beta1 has just been released. This release contains all updates made by Olger Warnier in the last 6 months to make Wicket Security work with Wicket 1.4 and the examples he added. It also contains the new ComponentSubclassPermission, which makes it possible to authorize a

Re: PageLink deprecated

2010-01-19 Thread Emond Papegaaij
But leaving IPageLink without any classes using it seems a bit weird to me. I think IPageLink should be removed with PageLink and probably be moved to wicket-security. On Tuesday 19 January 2010 11:36:59 Jeroen Steenbeeke wrote: Which is what I suggested earlier in this discussion as well. So

Re: PageLink deprecated

2010-01-18 Thread Emond Papegaaij
I totally agree with Jeroen. The 3rd constructor is dangerous and should be removed. The other two, however, are lazy and create the page in the onClick (provided that the IPageLink interface is implemented correctly). Of course, it is possible to copy PageLink and IPageLink to wicket-security,

Re: PageLink deprecated

2010-01-18 Thread Emond Papegaaij
That's what I'm trying to say: it can't be accomplished by either BookmarkablePageLink or Link. Link does not have a getPageIdentity method and BookmarkablePageLink only works for bookmarkable links (duh). So Link is never an option because of the missing getPageIdentity method and

Re: wicket security future - contribute!

2010-01-14 Thread Emond Papegaaij
not yet started. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

PageLink deprecated

2010-01-14 Thread Emond Papegaaij
it does not provide the page identity, and using BookmarkablePageLink is not an option because in many cases the target page is not bookmarkable. Can PageLink please be restored? Best regards, Emond Papegaaij - To unsubscribe, e

Re: PageLink deprecated

2010-01-14 Thread Emond Papegaaij
The javadoc says I should use Link or BookmarkablePageLink, which, as I explained, are both not an option. Emond On Friday 15 January 2010 05:08:42 Igor Vaynberg wrote: what does the javadoc say? -igor On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote

Re: question about swarm

2010-01-12 Thread Emond Papegaaij
(with org.apache.wicket.security.hive.authorization.permissions.ComponentSubclassPermission). Best regards, Emond Papegaaij On Thursday 07 January 2010 12:42:17 Emond Papegaaij wrote: Well, provided you've implemented the ComponentSubclassPermission, you could overwrite the alias for ComponentPermission

Re: question about swarm

2010-01-07 Thread Emond Papegaaij
On 6 jan 2010, at 14:03, Emond Papegaaij wrote: Hi Olger, The InPrincipal annotation is something we developed as an alternative for the hive files (which we find difficult to maintain, not only with anonymous inner classes). Principals are defined by a set of classes with annotations

Re: question about swarm

2010-01-06 Thread Emond Papegaaij
that does not only give permission to the specified class, but also to its subclasses. This could be achieved by extending ComponentPermission and overriding the implies method. The first part of the the path array should contain the classname of the component. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij

Re: question about swarm

2010-01-06 Thread Emond Papegaaij
AnnotatedPermission ? That would be really great. Kind Regards, Olger On 6 jan 2010, at 12:52, Emond Papegaaij wrote: Hi, Your change breaks some functionality. It is now no longer possible to grant permissions for anonymous inner classes at all, you are now forced to grant the permission

Re: debug mode

2009-07-15 Thread Emond Papegaaij
I've had similar problems when using method breakpoints on inner classes. Removing the breakpoint speeds up the entire application dramatically (the breakpoint also doesn't work). So try removing your breakpoints. Emond On Tuesday 14 July 2009 19:15:02 John Ipson wrote: Has anyone ever run

Re: Adding components to Pages based on conditionals

2009-04-17 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Personally, I think, it is much more elegant to call setVisible on the component you want to display or hide, or, when the outcome of the condition can change on each render, override isVisible to return the outcome of the condition. Emond Papegaaij On Friday 17 April 2009 08:50:21 Vladimir K

  1   2   >