RefreshingView
heyho, public abstract class RefreshingViewT extends RepeatingView has the typeparameter but no public IModelT getModel(). can someone add it please or let me add it, i would do it too, plus setModel(), setModelObject(), getModelObject(). regarz -- Neu: GMX Doppel-FLAT mit Internet-Flatrate + Telefon-Flatrate für nur 19,99 Euro/mtl.!* http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: RefreshingView
ah noo i am wrong, the type parameter is for the items that are used inside, not for the model of the refreshingview itself. my fault, sry. :D though but your answer didnt help me to find that out... ;) MartinM wrote: It has getDefaultModelObject etc?? ** Martin 2009/9/27 g...@gmx.net: heyho, public abstract class RefreshingViewT extends RepeatingView has the typeparameter but no public IModelT getModel(). can someone add it please or let me add it, i would do it too, plus setModel(), setModelObject(), getModelObject(). regarz -- Neu: GMX Doppel-FLAT mit Internet-Flatrate + Telefon-Flatrate für nur 19,99 Euro/mtl.!* http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RefreshingView-tp25636765p25637138.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 2 new models for wicket
chainable, i called it InheritedChainableModel.
now i tried to implement those two and there is a problem i'm facing. i
can't traverse through the component-hierarchy to find the right
model-object. i need this object so i can run the propertyresolver on
it. i
can only call getDefaultModelObject() to find out. and now there is the
problem:
imagine the following component hierarchy:
panel-markupcontainer-form-label
InheritedChainingModel-InheritedPropertyModel-nothing-InheritedPropertyModel
B-A-nothing-somePropertyOfA
the label calls getObject():
this.owner.getParent().getDefaultModelObject()
the InheritedPropertyModel knows its owner (IComponentAssignedModel)
which
is the label, calls its parent, which is the form and asks for the
default
model-object. since the form doesnt have a model, it's
getDefaultModelObject() calls: initModel()
initModel() traverses the component-hierarchy up until it finds the
first
IComponentInheritedModel. it finds it in the markupcontainer and its an
InheritedPropertyModel. this one now is asked getObject():
this.owner.getParent().getDefaultModelObject()
this one will give the object of the hosting InheritedChainingModel of
the
panel with B in it. now B is given back to the markupcontainer which
continues its getObject():
(W)PropertyResolver.getValue(this.property, target);
property is A and target is B - A as object is returned to the form
which in turn continues its getObject():
(W)PropertyResolver.getValue(this.property, target);
since this model is an inherited from markupcontainer, it has the same
property which is A, but the target this time is A itself, coming from
the
markupcontainer.
and this is the problem... when i look at a components model, i dont
want
it to be initialized, i just want to know if there is some
IComponentInheritedModel. getModelImpl() is the way to go, but it is not
visible. getInnermostModel() calls getDefaultModel(). i dont have a
chance.
or can somebody see a solution to this? i think there isnt any.
since i'm willing to contribute those two models, i propose to change
something in the wickets component-code. give me a hasModel(). or give
me a
public getModel(). i would do these changes.
tell me your opinion.
regards
garz
ps: here are the sources of the two models:
public class InheritedPropertyModelT
implements IComponentInheritedModelT,
IComponentAssignedModelT
{
private String property;
public InheritedPropertyModel(String property) {
if (Strings.isEmpty(property))
throw new IllegalArgumentException(Parameter
property cannot be null or empty);
this.property = property;
}
�...@suppresswarnings(unchecked)
�...@override
public W IWrapModelW wrapOnInheritance(Component component) {
return (IWrapModelW) new
AttachedInheritedPropertyModel();
}
�...@override
public final T getObject() {
throw new RuntimeException(get object call not expected
on
a IComponentAssignedModel);
}
�...@override
public final void setObject(T object) {
throw new RuntimeException(set object call not expected
on
a IComponentAssignedModel);
}
�...@override
public void detach() {
}
�...@override
public IWrapModelT wrapOnAssignment(Component component) {
return new AssignedInheritedPropertyModelT(property,
component);
}
private class AssignedInheritedPropertyModelW
implements IWrapModelW {
private String property;
private Component owner;
public AssignedInheritedPropertyModel(String property,
Component owner) {
this.property = property;
this.owner = owner;
}
�...@override
public IModel? getWrappedModel() {
return InheritedPropertyModel.this;
}
�...@suppresswarnings(unchecked)
public W getTarget() {
return
(W)this.owner.getParent().getInnermostModel().getObject();
}
�...@suppresswarnings(unchecked)
�...@override
public W getObject() {
final W target = getTarget();
if (target != null)
{
return
(W)PropertyResolver.getValue(this.property, target);
}
return null;
}
�...@override
public void setObject(W object) {
PropertyResolverConverter prc = null;
prc = new
PropertyResolverConverter(Application.get().getConverterLocator(),
Session.get
2 new models for wicket
these changes.
tell me your opinion.
regards
garz
ps: here are the sources of the two models:
public class InheritedPropertyModelT
implements IComponentInheritedModelT, IComponentAssignedModelT {
private String property;
public InheritedPropertyModel(String property) {
if (Strings.isEmpty(property))
throw new IllegalArgumentException(Parameter property
cannot be null or empty);
this.property = property;
}
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
@Override
public W IWrapModelW wrapOnInheritance(Component component) {
return (IWrapModelW) new AttachedInheritedPropertyModel();
}
@Override
public final T getObject() {
throw new RuntimeException(get object call not expected on a
IComponentAssignedModel);
}
@Override
public final void setObject(T object) {
throw new RuntimeException(set object call not expected on a
IComponentAssignedModel);
}
@Override
public void detach() {
}
@Override
public IWrapModelT wrapOnAssignment(Component component) {
return new AssignedInheritedPropertyModelT(property,
component);
}
private class AssignedInheritedPropertyModelW
implements IWrapModelW {
private String property;
private Component owner;
public AssignedInheritedPropertyModel(String property,
Component owner) {
this.property = property;
this.owner = owner;
}
@Override
public IModel? getWrappedModel() {
return InheritedPropertyModel.this;
}
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
public W getTarget() {
return
(W)this.owner.getParent().getInnermostModel().getObject();
}
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
@Override
public W getObject() {
final W target = getTarget();
if (target != null)
{
return
(W)PropertyResolver.getValue(this.property, target);
}
return null;
}
@Override
public void setObject(W object) {
PropertyResolverConverter prc = null;
prc = new
PropertyResolverConverter(Application.get().getConverterLocator(),
Session.get().getLocale());
PropertyResolver.setValue(this.property, getTarget(),
object, prc);
}
@Override
public void detach() {
}
}
private class AttachedInheritedPropertyModel
implements IWrapModelT {
@Override
public IModelT getWrappedModel() {
return InheritedPropertyModel.this;
}
@Override
public T getObject() {
return InheritedPropertyModel.this.getObject();
}
@Override
public void setObject(T object) {
InheritedPropertyModel.this.setObject(object);
}
@Override
public void detach() {
InheritedPropertyModel.this.detach();
}
}
}
public class InheritedChainingModelT
implements IChainingModelT, IComponentInheritedModelT {
private Object target;
public InheritedChainingModel(final Object object) {
this.target = object;
}
@Override
public IModel? getChainedModel() {
if (target instanceof IModel?)
{
return (IModel?)target;
}
return null;
}
@Override
public void setChainedModel(IModel? model) {
target = model;
}
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
@Override
public T getObject() {
if (target instanceof IModel?)
{
return ((IModelT)target).getObject();
}
return (T)target;
}
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
@Override
public void setObject(T object) {
if (target instanceof IModel?)
{
((IModelT)target).setObject(object);
}
else
{
target = object
IComponentAssignedModel and ComponentModel
hi, i have a question regarding implementation details of wicket. IComponentAssignedModel is used to make a model aware of the component its assigned to. ComponentModel is a quick implementation of this interface. why is it done with an inner class? why not just have an attribute on the outer class and assign the component to it in wrapOnAssignment(Component component)? why an inner class? and how i'm supposed to use ComponentModel as a base class when i cant subclass the innerclass because its private and therefor not visible? thanks in advance, garz -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
IComponentAssignedModel and ComponentModel
hi, i have a question regarding implementation details of wicket. IComponentAssignedModel is used to make a model aware of the component its assigned to. ComponentModel is a quick implementation of this interface. why is it done with an inner class? why not just have an attribute on the outer class and assign the component to it in wrapOnAssignment(Component component)? why an inner class? and how i'm supposed to use ComponentModel as a base class when i cant subclass the innerclass because its private and therefor not visible? thanks in advance, garz -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
IComponentAssignedModel and ComponentModel
hi, i have a question regarding implementation details of wicket. IComponentAssignedModel is used to make a model aware of the component its assigned to. ComponentModel is a quick implementation of this interface. why is it done with an inner class? why not just have an attribute on the outer class and assign the component to it in wrapOnAssignment(Component component)? why an inner class? thanks in advance, garz (just want to learn) -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
IComponentAssignedModel and ComponentModel
hi, i have a question regarding implementation details of wicket. IComponentAssignedModel is used to make a model aware of the component its assigned to. ComponentModel is a quick implementation of this interface. why is it done with an inner class? why not just have an attribute on the outer class and assign the component to it in wrapOnAssignment(Component component)? why an inner class? thanks in advance, garz (just want to learn) -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
IComponentAssignedModel and ComponentModel
hi, i have a question regarding implementation details of wicket. IComponentAssignedModel is used to make a model aware of the component its assigned to. ComponentModel is a quick implementation of this interface. why is it done with an inner class? why not just have an attribute on the outer class and assign the component to it in wrapOnAssignment(Component component)? why an inner class? thanks in advance, garz (just want to learn) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: IComponentAssignedModel and ComponentModel
ok, this is kind of embarassing. i subscribed to the list, but i didnt get any feedback if it was successful. i post a message to the mailinglist, no feedback again. i look in nabble, my mail isnt there. what am i supposed to think? so i subscribed again and again with little differences and everytime i sent a new email. nothing happened. i cant know that nabble takes 10 hours to list a mail that was send to the list. why not just using a forum? its the successor of mailinglists. :D ok back to topic. why wrap the model if i just want to assign the component, that the model is assigned to. why not just set a property on the model itself? why wrap the model itself? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IComponentAssignedModel-and-ComponentModel-tp25593781p25605171.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Panel not using generics
i want the getModelObject() (which is in fact the getDefaultModelObject()) to return the actual type that i dont need to do unchecked casts. i'm just wondering, now that everything uses generics, why does the panel do not use generics? just want to understand the reason behind this. regards garz reiern70 wrote: What's the meaning you want to attach to the missing generic parameter? Best, Ernesto On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Kurt Zitze g...@gmx.net wrote: hey, why does the panel is not using generics for type safety? regards -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atbrowser - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Panel-not-using-generics-tp25362188p25362915.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
