what is the salt that you use?
because we use the session specific key, but that can also already be used
like that in 1.4 is it maybe a different default so that you now use a
session key as salt?
does the database have enough room voor the encrypted? is it not truncated?
Op 11 nov. 2012 17:04
Permspace is tricky
Do we have a nice management console on that server?
Because it looks like to little class/perm space mem us configured or we
leak classes when un deploying
On May 8, 2012 11:59 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
I can see it now ...
Maybe it is because I
No this is bad, i agree with Igor, the latest page should be refreshed, not
reset!
By the way, the hybrid in 1.4 what we are using does look at the mount if
the page doesn't exists any more. And we depend on that, am i reading it
right that we lost that in 1.5?
On Mar 22, 2012 11:12 PM,
But that kills the complete back button support right?
Do pages increment their version then?
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 13:47, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
Our domain model has about 335 persistent
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 15:21, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
yes. each new page gets its id during construction from the session counter.
if Page#isVersioned() returns 'false' then it will not create new
versions of that page
i see that giving a custom IPageManager is also already
...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 15:21, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
yes. each new page gets its id during construction from the session counter.
if Page#isVersioned() returns 'false
Isn't this just an encrypted url request to an session that is already
expired?
On Jul 7, 2011 4:06 PM, Horacio Natyural horacio.natyu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
anyone ever encountered this kind of error?
i'm getting another page whenever I get this error. It's very
intermettent and I'm not
yes that is the trick, all the urls that are generated before that
can't be used anymore because encrypted urls are session based.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 09:46, Horacio Natyural
horacio.natyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
i've noticed that it seems to happen after login. I've used the
power failure at the ISP, not everything came up, should be fine now
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 02:37, Steve Swinsburg steve.swinsb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The wicketstuff site is down
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket/
Safari can’t open the page “http://wicketstuff.org/wicket/” because Safari
but if you have it down to 200K then 50 users it is nothing... thats
10MB on memory
If if both where 2X so 400K and 100 users thats still only 40MB in
memory Thats for a server nothing..
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:10, Per p...@hamburg.de wrote:
So I still haven't solved my memory
works fine for me to
2011/1/10 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
really strange because it doesnt happen to me:
http://pastebin.com/fe1pjZjy
-igor
2011/1/9 Marcin Zajączkowski msz...@wp.pl:
On 2011-01-09 22:00, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:
Hi,
Following some problems with page
Why are we discussing here already that works in wicket 1.4 if you
really need it?
public class HelloWorld extends WebPage implements IComponentResolver {
public HelloWorld()
{
add(new WebMarkupContainer(body));
add(new Label(label,my label));
:
This does not really nest the components logically, does it?
If you set get(body).setVisible(false) will the label remain visible?
**
Martin
2010/11/9 Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com:
Why are we discussing here already that works in wicket 1.4 if you
really need it?
public class
...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
How will it work if I call get(body).setEnabled(false); and if label
was a textfield? Would the textfield be still enabled?
**
Martin
2010/11/9 Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com:
no ofcourse not
The label will then be gone because the body is gone.
so
, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
textfield.isEnabledInHierachy() will then ofcourse not get to the
parent it is on.
because its parent is the webpage not the body markupcontainer.
So no this will not resolver from the child to the parent, only the
parent to the child.
On Tue, Nov 9
for a lot of usecases that require proper
hierarchy. like a form trying to find form submitting component, etc
-igor
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
ok a sample that it also works in with the right parent:
public class HelloWorld extends WebPage
Any other page can't be true, access to that page is not possible, but other
pages in other pagemaps should be accessable just fine
that time out can be configured see irequestcyclesetttings
- Original message -
I have an upload form where users can upload very large files. Upload can
solution
so that the user can continue with using site normally while waiting for
upload to finish?
It looks like performing upload in a separete pagemap could solve the
problem. Is it possible to implement that?
2010/9/25 Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
Any other page can't be true
an image button can be stateless:
protected boolean getStatelessHint()
{
return getImageResource() == null
localizedImageResource.isStateless();
}
but that must be true.
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 13:19, b...@actrix.gen.nz wrote:
Hi,
I had a stateless
If NamedParameter is something like;
/show?id=10test=11
IndexedParameter is not something like:
/show/id/10/test/11
thats still named, just differently outputed, but
show/10/11
indexed then the name is presumed (its 1 ,2 ,3 ,...)
johan
2010/8/12 Major Péter majorpe...@sch.bme.hu:
Hi,
doesnt the message of that exception tell you which object class is the problem?
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:24, Thomas Singer wic...@regnis.de wrote:
Hi,
In our server logs we have a couple of WicketNotSerializableException
logged, but we don't know when they occur. How we can create them
On 11.08.2010 09:27, Johan Compagner wrote:
doesnt the message of that exception tell you which object class is the
problem?
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:24, Thomas Singer wic...@regnis.de wrote:
Hi,
In our server logs we have a couple of WicketNotSerializableException
logged, but we don't know when
:
Unfortunately, this does not answer my question.
Tom
On 11.08.2010 09:57, Johan Compagner wrote:
then you just have to check where those classes are used and where
they could be stored in a wicket component/model
and make sure you detach that object .
Wicket tells you the field hierarchy
to know how I can generate this exception in my development
environment. It is nasty to test on the production system.
Tom
On 11.08.2010 10:53, Johan Compagner wrote:
why not?
if you know which page it was and which component/model that holds
that none serializable class
then you just have
, 2010 at 13:56, Thomas Singer wic...@regnis.de wrote:
When exactly the serialization happens? When viewing a page?
Tom
On 11.08.2010 13:25, Johan Compagner wrote:
the only way to do this is as i described look where the exception
really comes from
and go to that same page in your developer
I am against that patch.
You keep pagemaps in memory in the applicaiton context!
Those are session stuff stored in the HttpSession. You shouldnt keep
reference to those stuff.
This can break all kind of things (for example clustering)
If you want something like that, then it is fine if we need to
yes that is most likely the case.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 16:17, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I have a theory about what is causing this issue. Just wanted to run it by
you guys. In my log files, I first see this:
error screen when they do that.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote:
yes that is most likely the case.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 16:17, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
wrote:
I have a theory about what is causing this issue. Just wanted to run
is that you then have less type checking there. Because that
would make IVisitor completely generic
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 15:27, Joseph Pachod j...@thomas-daily.de wrote:
Johan Compagner wrote:
you can use:
public final S extends Component Object visitChildren(final
Class? clazz
you can use:
public final S extends Component Object visitChildren(final Class?
clazz,
final IVisitorS visitor)
then you have to cast yes, but you can cast safely.
johan
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:09, Joseph Pachod j...@thomas-daily.de wrote:
hello
I wanted to do
i think the problem with those memory analyzers that they give you the heap
Not the non heap, which is currently the problem..
If really constantly classes are leaked without that you constantly
redeploy web applications (because that would be a leak somewhere in
wicket or the app itself)
but the
impossible
there is so such thing as ParameterizedType for the example you give..
if you do:
TextFieldInteger field = new TextFieldInteger();
then at runtime that information isnt there anymore. Its gone. welcome
to type erasure..
I think stuff like that is only there if you do:
class
as far as i see now if i look that the stacktrace:
java.io.ObjectStreamClass.init(ObjectStreamClass.java:413)
java.io.ObjectStreamClass.lookup(ObjectStreamClass.java:310
so ObjectSTreamClass.lookup call there the constructor of ObjectStreamClass
lookup does check for caches but those are
engine warning: target VM cannot load class to instrument
sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor1
*** probably it has been unloaded recently
Sounds like we're on the right track, perhaps?
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
as far as i see now if i
*** probably it has been unloaded recently
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:40 AM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
wrote:
the only thing i dont get is that for you the forSerialization flag
should be true (at least
what kind of classes are serialized constantly?
are those proxies or other generated onces?
Somehow it has something to do with getting the default constructor of
the first none serializable class
And i think your first class in the hierarchy that is found that
doenst implement Serializable
can we now deprecate protected boolean callOnBeforeRenderIfNotVisible() ??
because you could do it now in onConfigure right?
I hate multiply things do do the same thing :(
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:05, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
protected boolean
works fine for me (except that Confluence is taken down i think on purpose)
2010/7/20 Vytautas Čivilis cvl...@gmail.com:
Hi.
As you might already noticed, http://wicketstuff.org is down.
Anyone have any ideas?
V
-
To
welcome!
hope you happily merge even more stuff ;)
johan
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 13:21, Martin Grigorov
martin.grigo...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks a lot for the voted trust in me, team!
As a big open source believer it is an honour for me to be a part of
the team that made such a great
Is that tomcat 7??
But t seems that we dont clean up our page saving thread.
That sounds like a leak to me. Application.shutdown or something should clean
up that
- Original message -
Anybody seen this before?
SEVERE: Error filterStart
Jun 24, 2010 3:24:06 PM
Gmail is by the way not ajax but a flash application.
There is an opensource flash app i think on sourceforge that does pretty much
the same as gmail.
- Original message -
I want to have gmail like file upload in my application , I want to
have ajax multi file upload ,
of RequestCycle. This is what normally leads to this problem
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Ayodeji Aladejebi aladej...@gmail.com
wrote:
version 1.4.6 on windows vista running on tomcat 6.0.26
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
wrote:
hmm
looking
hmm
looking at the stack of the of that thread that has the lock on the page map
then it seems to me that that shouldnt happen, because that thread is doing
nothing anymore if the stack dump of that thread is really the right one.
Because that just seems to be in a waiting state in a tomcat pool
not serialize the
page, because these requests don't change the page and they are called
continuously by design.
I can extend WebRequestCycleProcessor and override resolve() method, but I
cannot avoid searching page by calling Session.getPage().
M.
On 19.4.2010 10:37, Johan Compagner wrote
so for that ajax request you do want to create a new page every time the
ajax request hits?
2010/4/19 Martin Schayna martin.scha...@abra.eu
I have pretty stateful page with plenty of AJAX components. Most of these
components have behaviors, which renders JavaScript code for calling AJAX
And i to the N900..
I want freedom, dont want to be controlled by fruit
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 17:12, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
but i just switched to htc hero :|
-igor
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 7:10 AM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
There's an app for
its a browser from August 27, 2001 ... thats 9 years ago..
So who is using opera 6 ? Or Netscape 7? Or Safari 1.0 ?
Just dont support it anymore, drop it then the usage will also drop
Its a chicken and egg problem! if we keep supporting it it will drag on!
Force them to upgrade
In our product,
yes we didnt do that by default because it is quite annoying behavior
Back button should be quick and shouldnt load it from the server again at
least not by default.
You can configure it for you application the way you like. But for many
others back should really be browser cache back.
On Wed,
Do you add the state ddc to the ajax target when you get a ajax country event?
- Original message -
Sven,
Thanks for your input. It seems that you do not understand the problem I have
(Wicket problem??? or my page problem???). I know how Ajax works by adding
components to Ajax
but still see that the pagemap is locked when the
stack overflows. Do you know if the fix to WICKET-2075 is in 1.4.7?
Thanks
Nigel
Johan Compagner wrote:
i fixed 2075 so that it should always unlock the pages.
Problem is that you still could get weird errors because that page
i fixed 2075 so that it should always unlock the pages.
Problem is that you still could get weird errors because that page is not in
a valid state in the session.
So if back buttons/page versions are used it could be that that doesnt work
So what should be fixed is the original problem
On
look at your html code
because somehow you get those kind of urls
org.apache.wicket.ajax.WicketAjax%3C/div%3E%3Cdiv%20class=
back to wicket and that seems very weird.
it seems that that is a piece of html with those div and class stuff.
It could also be that this is done by some header
an int (primitive) is always required.
We have to set it to something. cant be null
if you want to be able to not require it (so null) make it an Integer not
int
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 16:48, Thierry Leveque tleve...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's what I have in my code:
TextFieldInteger
no just the opposite
bookmarkable url will create a new page (which can be state full or
stateless)
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 14:09, Loritsch, Berin C.
berin.lorit...@gd-ais.comwrote:
It's bookmarked pages that avoid new page creation isn't it?
-Original Message-
From: Matej Knopp
if you constantly target exactly that url
then that will be a new page everytime because thats just a bookmarkable
url.
not an instance url.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:52, manuelbarzi manuelba...@gmail.com wrote:
the url is this: http://localhost:9090/test/
So you just want to throw all the components of a page or panel (the one
with markup) in 1 big place.
then all those have to be uniquely named ofcourse. Throughout the complete
page.
Repeaters will then be a bit special i guess. Because they are generation
ListItem components for you
that then
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 07:32, Sudhir N sudhir_nima...@yahoo.com wrote:
One more thing I am still looking for is, integrating GWT. I did that
before with other framework.
i asked this question more
How do you see this integration? What should be integrated. What should
wicket do? What
public class HomePage extends WebPage {
private Long value = 0L;
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
Model m = new ModelSerializable() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
// It doesn't
can you try 1.4.3?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:07, Kurt Heston khes...@hestonsystems.comwrote:
Tonight, I moved from v1.3.5 to v1.4.4. I'm up and running after
changing all of my getModel statements, but an old performance problem
has shown up again.
Back when I moved to 1.3.x, pages
in trunk of 1.4 this should also be fixed.
so if you can use a snapshot of it that should work also
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 18:07, Kurt Heston khes...@hestonsystems.comwrote:
Johan Marat, thank you!
Downgrading to 1.4.3 cured it. If I see the problem again, I'll check
the forums and Jira
to have a close button that do the same as the cross
image, but I'm not able to find which javascript code is executed on this
cross image.
Regards
Bernard
Johan Compagner wrote:
it could be that if you do that then in normal use
the serverside doesnt know that the modal window isnt shown
why not
it kills a lot of code.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 17:45, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
I wouldn't use CPM for anything serious anyways...
my 2cents
**
Martin
2009/12/14 Xavier López xavil...@gmail.com:
Hi,
In my application I have a number of
Modal windows are working find for me on IE8
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket14/ajax/modal-window
are you saying that above example doesnt work?
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 01:41, victorTrapiello vic...@trapiello.net wrote:
Hello guyss, I find it anoying as well I´m developing a web app and now I
, if it works for you, use it.
my 2cents
**
Martin
2009/12/15 Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com:
why not
it kills a lot of code.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 17:45, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
I wouldn't use CPM for anything serious anyways...
my 2cents
http://wicketinaction.com/2009/11/removing-fragile-string-expressions-from-wicket-code/
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 16:52, Juan Carlos Garcia M. jcgarc...@gmail.comwrote:
Johan, Can you elaborate more on that please? What is this new solution?
Johan Compagner wrote:
so you where talking
isnt your page not just a brand new shiny new instance?
place a breakpoint in your constructor
On 14/12/2009, Warren Bell warr...@clarksnutrition.com wrote:
Does Any body have any ideas, I am stuck and can't figure this out.
I have a page with about 10 text fields. The model for the page is a
in Mozilla! maybe I do not have the last Wicket
release, what do you think¿?
Thanks for the reply Johan
Johan Compagner wrote:
Modal windows are working find for me on IE8
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket14/ajax/modal-window
are you saying that above example doesnt work
did wicket 2.0 had a tardis??
i am checking svn right now for those lost diamonds!
On 11/12/2009, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
maybe wicket 2.0 will come with a TardisPageStore :)
-igor
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Neil Curzon neil.cur...@gmail.com wrote:
You are right,
somehow the disks where full again
i deleted as much logging as i can and some old stuff
so we should be able to go on
Biggest problem is as always but nobody seems to be able to fix that shitty
maven:
http://www.wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.5-SNAPSHOT/
It still
/openlayers/1.4-SNAPSHOT/
Heres something on the topic..
http://jlorenzen.blogspot.com/2007/09/how-to-effectively-use-snapshot.html
I might be able to look at it tomorrow..
2009/12/9 Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
somehow the disks where full again
i deleted
it could be that if you do that then in normal use
the serverside doesnt know that the modal window isnt shown anymore.
So i guess you should also try to let the server know.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:16, Bernard Lupin beal6...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hi again,
After a lot of various tries, I finally
We try to do our best, but the problem is that this is a leak internal to
java itself (classloader and urlconnection)
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/context.html
play with antiJarLocking and antiResouceLocking attributes.
johan
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 09:41, Pascal Grange
/users@wicket.apache.org/msg43879.html
Maarten
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
wrote:
We try to do our best, but the problem is that this is a leak internal to
java itself (classloader and urlconnection)
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config
*always* recalculates lastModified.
And lastModified() calls urlConnection.getInputstream().close();
Best Regards,
Ilja Pavkovic
Am Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2009 11:40:04 schrieb Johan Compagner:
ahh
i did knew that there was already code for that in place
but thats only
load that data in separate threads, dont touch any wicket components
in those threads
make a component like ajaxlazyload that polls for that data if still
not there use a timer of a few seconds to test it again
On 28/11/2009, Kaspar Fischer kaspar.fisc...@dreizak.com wrote:
Because the requests
yes that component isnt nicely written, the tabs field should be a model
(make a jira entry for this)
but from the outside you can use:
public final ListITab getTabs()
{
return tabs;
}
to add or remove tabs.
That is the same list as you give the constructor
So you could
the pro's of this compared to the SafeProperty is that the safe property
needs to generate proxies at runtime so you need CGLIB and you could have
issues with final classes
this is more a develop environment solution which is because of that a bit
nicer.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:53, Maarten
http://help.eclipse.org/help32/index.jsp?topic=/org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv/reference/api/org/eclipse/ltk/core/refactoring/participants/package-summary.html
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 13:52, James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:
Refactoring could definitely be supported in IDEA. With
193.46.80.204
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:46, Ilja Pavkovic ilja.pavko...@binaere-bauten.de
wrote:
Dear Martijn,
THE server had been moves to another ip. I havent had time to update dns
perhaps you can tell us the ip so I am able to use the maven repository
while
the dns update is not yet
i already did that
its up again but it was AGAIN disk full problems
and that is because of that STUPID maven that generates unique snapshots
Who is the maven expert here that will FIX that problems on all our pom
files?
i have been deleting stuff now for at least 1 hour!
johan
On Tue, Oct 27,
the projects which are not in wicketstuff-core.
El mar, 27-10-2009 a las 10:41 +0100, Johan Compagner escribió:
i already did that
its up again but it was AGAIN disk full problems
and that is because of that STUPID maven that generates unique
snapshots
Who is the maven expert here
looks to me like a screwed up tomcat install somehow.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:10, Fernando Wermus fernando.wer...@gmail.comwrote:
Does anyone face this exception under Tomcat?
The servelet-api.jar is in usr/share/tomcat5.5/lib/commons
javax.servlet.ServletException: Filter execution threw
no i did build something special in wicket so that it will never work on
those iphones.
Stop buying those fully controlled by apple phones.. Think for your self !
Freedom Freedom!
johan
:)
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 13:00, Edmund Urbani e...@liland.org wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering whether
Its almost getting replaced!
http://maemo.nokia.com/n900/
pure power! Full control! Multi tasking!
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 17:48, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
wrote:
no i did build something special in wicket
needs to check out this picture of Johan with his phone - it will
clear things up:
http://tinyurl.com/myz5dq
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Johan Compagner
i dont see how that can happen if i look at your code.
is RequestMessageForm .this != this.getForm() ??
do you nest forms?
johan
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:38, Charles Moulliard cmoulli...@gmail.comwrote:
I have created a form class which is used by a class extending
webpage. When I call
we tried that already but dismissed it
wicket has no support for this and for these kind of things to work
everything must be come a post
you cant use any normal links.
also you are trading in memory for cpu speed and bandwidth which is in my
eyes more expensive then memory or hd space
Page
And that back and forward buttons in the browser dont really work well in
the HttpSessionStore
But i cant believe that the overhead he is reporting is really the
overhead..
It could be an Antivirus checker or other stuff like that.
Besides that if that would be a problem just get an SSD and
Which version of wicket do you use?
Why do you need absoluut urls?
On 11/09/2009, Dima Rzhevskiy d...@rzhevskiy.info wrote:
Sorry, yes, urlFor return correct result.
toAbsolutePath(final String relativePagePath) do not return result what I
expected.
javadoc copy/pasted from
one question.
why do you want that?
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 06:01, b...@actrix.gen.nz wrote:
Hi,
With forms on Wicket pages, it appears that on submit which is HTTP
POST, Wicket redirects to the same page (the page from where the data
was sent) ad this is how we show feedback on the form
Pleae try to find out why it broke in 1.4.1 and make a case for this in jira
On 23/08/2009, Major Péter majorpe...@sch.bme.hu wrote:
Marcin,
That's it, thanks!!
I would never had thought about downgrading to 1.4.0.
After changing one character in pom.xml, it works...
Thanks again.
wicket can also do that for you
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 06:45, Anton Veretennikov
anton.veretenni...@gmail.com wrote:
As I remember, GWT appends some garbage to JS filenames as they change
to prevent this.
-- Tony
On 8/5/09, John Armstrong siber...@siberian.org wrote:
Install the web
There are other options like:
class MyLocalizer extends Localizer
{
getCacheKey() { if (xxx == yyy) return null} // dont return a cache
key for certain things
}
or
class MyLocalizer extends Localizer
{
public String getString(final String key, final Component component,
final
why would you serialize the request logger?
there is only one and that is attached to the Application it shouldnt be
serialized.
Just like that Settings object is also not serialize able or the
implementations of ISessionStore
johan
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 16:38, Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM)
in the RequestLogger as an
object in a model. Something like this:
New ModelRequestLogger(getRequestLogger());
Thx
Jing
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2009 16:43
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re
nope you cant serialize entries.
hashmap do there own custom serialization (just key/value) and they dont
serialize the internal structure to that data (the entries)
Thats why Entry is not serializeable
johan
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 12:06, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com
please make a jira issue for this
The detach of StringResourcemodel should walk over its param to check if it
is a model and call detach on those.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:44, Jonas barney...@gmail.com wrote:
A question about StringResourceModel: it supports IModels in the
'parameters'
we already have session unique pageid's:
getApplication().getSessionSettings().isPageIdUniquePerSession()
Then you dont have to have pagemap or enable the multi window support
You only need that if you really want to now that users uses different tabs.
Wicket doesnt really need it anymore then
no it doesnt.
if you make sure that the pageid is unique across the session
then you dont need pagemaps. And you can hold everything in 1 pagemap.
And if you do that then make sure then all he pages go into 1 pagemap
then make sure that:
*
public
* DiskPageStore(*int* maxSizePerPagemap, *int*
an then deploy a new
version of the app.
When I klick on a page link now then the error occurs. In former trunk
versions and all former wicket version I was redirected to the application's
homepage.
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompag
1 - 100 of 1360 matches
Mail list logo
