Isn't this a same thing:
onPopulateItem(final Item item) {
add(new Link("delete") {
protected void onClick() { service.delete(item.getModelObject()); }
});
}
Joni
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:56 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> onPopulateItem(Item item) {
> add(new Link("delete", item.getMode
Yeah, it could even be in its separate utility class:
interface IModel {}
class Component {
private IModel model;
public IModel getModel() {
return model;
}
}
public class Unsafe {
public static IModel cast(IModel model) {
return (IModel) model;
}
}
class M
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 15:22 +0200, Sebastiaan van Erk wrote:
> Does this always work nicely though, because you need to do a capture
> which means that the compiler must be able to infer the type... I've had
> problems before in these kind of situations that for me it seems
> obvious, but the
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 14:44 +0200, Sebastiaan van Erk wrote:
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > Generified component touches *ALL* code in Wicket, wether you care or
> > not. IModel itself is rather contained.
>
> Yes, but in my opinion rather useless as well. Plus you get heaps of
> @SuppressWarning
ork with eclipse 3.4m4?
>
>
> Joni Freeman wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > There's a new version of a plugin:
> > http://www.laughingpanda.org/mediawiki/index.php/Wicket_Bench
> >
> > This is mostly a maintenance release: Eclipse 3.3 support a
Hello!
There's a new version of a plugin:
http://www.laughingpanda.org/mediawiki/index.php/Wicket_Bench
This is mostly a maintenance release: Eclipse 3.3 support and Wicket
dependency is updated to be 1.3. The only new feature adds keybindings
to quickly create associated html or properties file
