Re: Start a panel, border, or page with an XML declaration?

2009-10-05 Thread Phil Housley
please share with us the detailed how-to? There's no particular secret, just call this.getMarkupSettings().setStripXmlDeclarationFromOutput(true); in your Application.init() method. Regards. --- On Sun, 10/4/09, Phil Housley undeconstruc...@gmail.com wrote: From: Phil Housley undeconstruc

Re: how to map 2 html files to 1 class?

2009-10-05 Thread Phil Housley
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Phil Housley - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr

Re: Start a panel, border, or page with an XML declaration?

2009-10-04 Thread Phil Housley
final thing to note is that IE6 will screw up any page with an ?xml declaration. I prefer to include it in my source, and then have Wicket strip it out at the last moment - at least when I'm forced to be IE6 compatible. -- Phil Housley

Re: Complicated workflows

2009-09-30 Thread Phil Housley
not forcing the issue, so I'm currently thinking I will have to step up the infrastructure to add things like error reporting. Fortunately I can just delegate to Wicket pretty quickly, so shouldn't be too much extra code. Phil. On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Phil Housley undeconstruc

Re: Complicated workflows

2009-09-30 Thread Phil Housley
. Despite all that, I don't particularly want a hard dependency on anything other than Wicket, so plain Java first, other things hopefully on top. Phil On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Phil Housley undeconstruc...@gmail.comwrote: Hello list, I'm currently working on some ideas for building

Re: Selectively ignoring required fields

2009-09-29 Thread Phil Housley
, and the radio buttons are partially processed out of sequence to get the input when its needed. I don't know how safe this is, but it seems to work. Thanks everyone. On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Phil Housley undeconstruc...@gmail.comwrote: 2009/9/15 Bas Gooren b...@iswd.nl: The fact

Complicated workflows

2009-09-29 Thread Phil Housley
to work around them, or does the whole thing sounds like so much crack? Thanks, -- Phil Housley - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Preventing Copy Pasting URL's In Same Browser Session

2009-09-29 Thread Phil Housley
to refresh, but if you are being strict on that sort of thing, I guess you will have a refresh button on the page when and only when it is appropriate. -- Phil Housley - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr

Re: Complicated workflows

2009-09-29 Thread Phil Housley
there though, so I'm doing it off my own back at home. Cheers, Scott On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Phil Housley undeconstruc...@gmail.com wrote: Hello list, I'm currently working on some ideas for building apps with fairly complex workflows.  My aim is to find a nice pattern/framework

Selectively ignoring required fields

2009-09-15 Thread Phil Housley
it around as raw input, but I don't want to know if it is missing or fails to convert/validate. Thanks for any help. -- Phil Housley - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail

Re: Selectively ignoring required fields

2009-09-15 Thread Phil Housley
in searching and various other places, so it would be a lot of work to make them all respond to this particular use. A way to just prevent the required check/validation from the top would fit the bill better. 2009/9/15 Phil Housley undeconstruc...@gmail.com: Hello, I'm currently working on a search

Re: Selectively ignoring required fields

2009-09-15 Thread Phil Housley
required flags on fields       // ...       // Call regular validation       super.validate();   } } Regards, Bas - Original Message - From: Phil Housley undeconstruc...@gmail.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:30 PM Subject: Re: Selectively

Re: Selectively ignoring required fields

2009-09-15 Thread Phil Housley
- From: Phil Housley undeconstruc...@gmail.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 3:37 PM Subject: Re: Selectively ignoring required fields Several interesting ideas, but they all seem to involve more invasive changes than I really want to make - either