Re: wicketstuff-push examples working across browsers

2011-10-28 Thread Soheb Mahmood
Hello Martin and Seb,

Just to drop an email to let you know how I'm doing so far, I've had a go 
yesterday, and to some extent, this morning at trying to get the master branch 
running, as I feel it is important to at least try and give feedback early as 
possible.

However, I've been struggling in trying to meet dependencies (it isn't anyone's 
fault but mine; I'm quite new to this and am doing this as a research project 
for our production application). I will try my best to actually get a 
wicketstuff-core snapshot, as well as a wicket snapshot and get the example 
running in IE.

Also, with Wicket 1.5.2 released recently, I assumed you'd get a stable version 
(even a RC) uploaded so at some point in the future I won't need to wrestle 
with snapshots any time soon.

Once again, many thanks for your time and effort.

Regards,
Soheb

- Original Message -
From: "Martin Grigorov" 
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 27 October, 2011 3:01:54 PM
Subject: Re: wicketstuff-push examples working across browsers

On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Soheb Mahmood  wrote:
> I just read my email again and I sounded really rude when asking my question. 
> What I mean to ask was, out of curiousity, if you were trying to get the IE7 
> browser+ working?
>
> I'm really sorry if I've offended you or anyone. I'm very embarrassed by that 
> tone in the email (it's not what I actually meant to say), and I really do 
> appreciate your hard work and effort towards wicketstuff (as I have seen on 
> git).

Did you try the latest code from wicketstuff/core master branch ?
Maybe it already works on IE...

>
> Soheb
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Sebastian" 
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 October, 2011 5:21:52 PM
> Subject: Re: wicketstuff-push examples working across browsers
>
> hi,
>
> cometd had a bug that affects websocket support in conjunction with
> chrome browsers. It is fixed in the latest 1.4.0RC1 release of cometd.
> We incorporated the changes (and fixed some other issues) in wicketstuff
> trunk. thus they will be available with the wicketstuff 1.5.2 release.
>
> Regards,
> Seb
>
> On 26.10.2011 10:25, Soheb Mahmood wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I'm planning to use wicketstuff-core in an actual production environment, 
>> and to be more specific, I'm planning to use push-cometd. I'm currently 
>> using wicketstuff version 1.4.14 to match the current version of Wicket we 
>> are using in production.
>>
>> I got the example to run, and one of the things I wondered was what is the 
>> browser support aimed for push-cometd? So far, I can only get the cometd 
>> example working in Firefox and Opera, and there is a lack of support for 
>> Google Chrome 14.0.835.202 nor Internet Explorer 7. I can get the Wicket 
>> Timer example working, but the reason we are thinking of implementing comet 
>> into production is to minimize the request impact on our server, and with 
>> the Wicket Timer example, that uses TimerPushService, which if we wanted 
>> similar functionality, we could just use AjaxTimeoutBehavior instead. Even 
>> the Basic Cometd test doesn't work under IE7 and Chrome.
>>
>> I was wondering if you were aware of this, and if you had any suggestions to 
>> solve this cross-browser issue (at least from our end). It's also worth 
>> noting that I haven't modified the push-parent-jdk-1.6 folder contents at 
>> all.
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> Soheb
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>



-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: wicketstuff-push examples working across browsers

2011-10-27 Thread Soheb Mahmood
I just read my email again and I sounded really rude when asking my question. 
What I mean to ask was, out of curiousity, if you were trying to get the IE7 
browser+ working?

I'm really sorry if I've offended you or anyone. I'm very embarrassed by that 
tone in the email (it's not what I actually meant to say), and I really do 
appreciate your hard work and effort towards wicketstuff (as I have seen on 
git).

Soheb

- Original Message -
From: "Sebastian" 
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 26 October, 2011 5:21:52 PM
Subject: Re: wicketstuff-push examples working across browsers

hi,

cometd had a bug that affects websocket support in conjunction with 
chrome browsers. It is fixed in the latest 1.4.0RC1 release of cometd. 
We incorporated the changes (and fixed some other issues) in wicketstuff 
trunk. thus they will be available with the wicketstuff 1.5.2 release.

Regards,
Seb

On 26.10.2011 10:25, Soheb Mahmood wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm planning to use wicketstuff-core in an actual production environment, and 
> to be more specific, I'm planning to use push-cometd. I'm currently using 
> wicketstuff version 1.4.14 to match the current version of Wicket we are 
> using in production.
>
> I got the example to run, and one of the things I wondered was what is the 
> browser support aimed for push-cometd? So far, I can only get the cometd 
> example working in Firefox and Opera, and there is a lack of support for 
> Google Chrome 14.0.835.202 nor Internet Explorer 7. I can get the Wicket 
> Timer example working, but the reason we are thinking of implementing comet 
> into production is to minimize the request impact on our server, and with the 
> Wicket Timer example, that uses TimerPushService, which if we wanted similar 
> functionality, we could just use AjaxTimeoutBehavior instead. Even the Basic 
> Cometd test doesn't work under IE7 and Chrome.
>
> I was wondering if you were aware of this, and if you had any suggestions to 
> solve this cross-browser issue (at least from our end). It's also worth 
> noting that I haven't modified the push-parent-jdk-1.6 folder contents at all.
>
> Many thanks,
> Soheb
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: wicketstuff-push examples working across browsers

2011-10-27 Thread Soheb Mahmood
Hello Seb,

Thanks for answering back to my email quickly. I'm glad to hear support for 
Chrome, but are you also supporting, at least trying to support IE7 and above?

Many thanks and regards,
Soheb

- Original Message -
From: "Sebastian" 
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 26 October, 2011 5:21:52 PM
Subject: Re: wicketstuff-push examples working across browsers

hi,

cometd had a bug that affects websocket support in conjunction with 
chrome browsers. It is fixed in the latest 1.4.0RC1 release of cometd. 
We incorporated the changes (and fixed some other issues) in wicketstuff 
trunk. thus they will be available with the wicketstuff 1.5.2 release.

Regards,
Seb

On 26.10.2011 10:25, Soheb Mahmood wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm planning to use wicketstuff-core in an actual production environment, and 
> to be more specific, I'm planning to use push-cometd. I'm currently using 
> wicketstuff version 1.4.14 to match the current version of Wicket we are 
> using in production.
>
> I got the example to run, and one of the things I wondered was what is the 
> browser support aimed for push-cometd? So far, I can only get the cometd 
> example working in Firefox and Opera, and there is a lack of support for 
> Google Chrome 14.0.835.202 nor Internet Explorer 7. I can get the Wicket 
> Timer example working, but the reason we are thinking of implementing comet 
> into production is to minimize the request impact on our server, and with the 
> Wicket Timer example, that uses TimerPushService, which if we wanted similar 
> functionality, we could just use AjaxTimeoutBehavior instead. Even the Basic 
> Cometd test doesn't work under IE7 and Chrome.
>
> I was wondering if you were aware of this, and if you had any suggestions to 
> solve this cross-browser issue (at least from our end). It's also worth 
> noting that I haven't modified the push-parent-jdk-1.6 folder contents at all.
>
> Many thanks,
> Soheb
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



wicketstuff-push examples working across browsers

2011-10-26 Thread Soheb Mahmood
Hello everyone,

I'm planning to use wicketstuff-core in an actual production environment, and 
to be more specific, I'm planning to use push-cometd. I'm currently using 
wicketstuff version 1.4.14 to match the current version of Wicket we are using 
in production.

I got the example to run, and one of the things I wondered was what is the 
browser support aimed for push-cometd? So far, I can only get the cometd 
example working in Firefox and Opera, and there is a lack of support for Google 
Chrome 14.0.835.202 nor Internet Explorer 7. I can get the Wicket Timer example 
working, but the reason we are thinking of implementing comet into production 
is to minimize the request impact on our server, and with the Wicket Timer 
example, that uses TimerPushService, which if we wanted similar functionality, 
we could just use AjaxTimeoutBehavior instead. Even the Basic Cometd test 
doesn't work under IE7 and Chrome.

I was wondering if you were aware of this, and if you had any suggestions to 
solve this cross-browser issue (at least from our end). It's also worth noting 
that I haven't modified the push-parent-jdk-1.6 folder contents at all.

Many thanks,
Soheb

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org