Need help with AutoCompleteTextField
Hi All, I have an AutoCompleteTextField on a form along with 2 DateTimeFields used to provide a start and end date range that is to be used by the autocomplete field to limit the number of choices returned by the getChoices() method. The problem is that the date values are always the original values for the fields and not the modified values which makes sense since the form has not been submitted. Any ideas or hints on how to get the current values for the dates on the form in the getChoices() method? Or is it even possible? Thanks, Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Need-help-with-AutoCompleteTextField-tp19143438p19143438.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need help with AutoCompleteTextField
Hi All, I have the date part of the DateTimeField updating to the entered value by adding an AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior to it. However the hours and minutes in the Date is now always 00:00:00 instead of the original value, even with an AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior added to the hours and minutes TextFields. I've tried also adding the DateTimeField and the DateTextFields to the target but that doesn't change anything. Jim jnorris wrote: Hi All, I have an AutoCompleteTextField on a form along with 2 DateTimeFields used to provide a start and end date range that is to be used by the autocomplete field to limit the number of choices returned by the getChoices() method. The problem is that the date values are always the original values for the fields and not the modified values which makes sense since the form has not been submitted. Any ideas or hints on how to get the current values for the dates on the form in the getChoices() method? Or is it even possible? Thanks, Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Need-help-with-AutoCompleteTextField-tp19143438p19143962.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DateTimeField validation
The DateTimeField validation message for hours for a 12-hour format indicates
that the date must be between 0 and 12. Shouldn't this be between 1 and 12?
The validator has the following:
protected Map variablesMap(IValidatable validatable)
{
final Map map = super.variablesMap(validatable);
map.put(minimum, new Long(0));
map.put(maximum, new Long(getMaximumHours()));
return map;
}
Shouldn't the minimum setting be 1 instead of 0 or am I missing something?
Jim
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DateTimeField-validation-tp19077792p19077792.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DateTimeField validation
Hi All,
Forget what I said before - I was convinced by a colleague that the hour
range was wrong when in fact it isn't wrong for the 12-hour range which has
the AM/PM. I'm not sure that the 24-hour range should allow an hour of 24
to be entered but I'm not too familiar with how people use a 24 hour clock.
Jim
jnorris wrote:
The DateTimeField validation message for hours for a 12-hour format
indicates that the date must be between 0 and 12. Shouldn't this be
between 1 and 12? The validator has the following:
protected Map variablesMap(IValidatable validatable)
{
final Map map = super.variablesMap(validatable);
map.put(minimum, new Long(0));
map.put(maximum, new Long(getMaximumHours()));
return map;
}
Shouldn't the minimum setting be 1 instead of 0 or am I missing something?
Jim
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DateTimeField-validation-tp19077792p19078120.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem getting value from DateTimeField
Hi All, I have a couple of DateTimeField components on a form on a page that has a Link that opens another page. In the onClick() method for the Link I need to get the values for the dates to put into a PageParameters object. However I can't seem to get the modified values for the dates. I've tried adding startdatefield.processInput() and startdatefield.validate(). In either (or both) cases the value that is returned from the field in the getModelObject() method is always the original date value, and the value returned for getInput() is always null, null:null. OTOH in an onSubmit() method for a Button on the form I can get the modified value as expected. I also tried form.process() but that didn't work either. I don't want to do a submit since other components may cause validation errors that don't mean anything in this case. I'm probably missing something obvious but I can't figure it out and I didn't find anything helpful in searching this forum. Any ideas on how to get the date values without submitting the form would be appreciated. Thanks, Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-getting-value-from-DateTimeField-tp19031215p19031215.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem getting value from DateTimeField
I was passing the dates (and some other fields) in parameters so they could be restored when returning back to the page. I just came across a different technique for doing this in Wicket In Action (listing 6.7) so it is no longer an issue for me. Thanks WIA! Great book - has helped me numerous times. Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-getting-value-from-DateTimeField-tp19031215p19032604.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help with ModalWindow
Hi All, I'm trying to use a ModalWindow for a confirmation dialog. Based on the button clicked I'm setting a value in in a hidden field that has an AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior that I'm trying to use to invoke an action method based on the user selection. I want to reuse this for pages that use a confirmation dialog so I have it in a base page. Everything works as expected except that the onchange method on the hidden field is not invoked. I've attached a quickstart that illustrates what I am trying to do with the hidden field replaced by a text field. The field value does change based on which button in the modal window is clicked. However, the onUpdate method for the text field at line 64 in BasePage.java is never called. If anyone can take a look at this and help me out I'd appreciate it. Also if there is a better way to do a confirmation dialog that invokes a method when the Yes button is selected I'd be interested in hearing how to go about http://www.nabble.com/file/p18831847/ModalTest.zip ModalTest.zip it. Thanks, Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Help-with-ModalWindow-tp18831847p18831847.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help with ModalWindow
For anyone interested I solved the problem I was having by changing the
onClose() method in setWindowClosedCallback in BasePage.java to the
following:
public void onClose( AjaxRequestTarget target )
{
Form form = (Form) BasePage.this.get( baseForm );
HiddenField field = (HiddenField) form.get( confirmResultField );
target.addComponent( field );
doConfirmAction( target );
}
I also removed the adding of the resultfield to the target in the onSubmit
methods in the ConfirmPage class and the AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
on the confirm field.
In my application the doConfirmAction() method checks the value of the
hidden field. If it is Yes it does some DB updates. When finished it
sets a result message in the PageParameters object and then calls
setResponsePage(new MyPage( parms )) to open up the previous page with the
changed values. The message is added to the feedback panel in
onBeforeRender() when the page opens.
So the use case would be something like select a user from a user list page
and open a user edit page. When edits are done click the Save button. If
there are no validation errors open the modal window to confirm the
operation. If the user clicks Yes update the DB, add a message to be
displayed to page parameters and set the response page to the user list
page. If the user clicks no just reopen the user list page.
Jim
jnorris wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to use a ModalWindow for a confirmation dialog. Based on the
button clicked I'm setting a value in in a hidden field that has an
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior that I'm trying to use to invoke an
action method based on the user selection. I want to reuse this for pages
that use a confirmation dialog so I have it in a base page. Everything
works as expected except that the onchange method on the hidden field is
not invoked. I've attached a quickstart that illustrates what I am trying
to do with the hidden field replaced by a text field. The field value
does change based on which button in the modal window is clicked.
However, the onUpdate method for the text field at line 64 in
BasePage.java is never called.
If anyone can take a look at this and help me out I'd appreciate it.
Also if there is a better way to do a confirmation dialog that invokes a
method when the Yes button is selected I'd be interested in hearing how to
go about http://www.nabble.com/file/p18831847/ModalTest.zip ModalTest.zip
it.
Thanks,
Jim
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Help-with-ModalWindow-tp18831847p18836701.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: help with RadioGroup in Table
Hi Thomas, Using the row model worked. I changed the value of the text box with data from the domain object in the row model, and set that as the target and bingo! Thank you for your help. Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/help-with-RadioGroup-in-Table-tp18036005p18112563.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: help with RadioGroup in Table
This problem is a real show-stopper for me so I really need some help if anyone has done something similiar. I added AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior to the RadioGroup as mentioned in another post and it hits onUpdate every time a radio button is selected. However, I can't figure out 1) how to get the selected row item's data object from the table and 2) what component to add to the AjaxRequestTarget (tried the radio group but it throws an exception). BTW, I gave a prezo to my group a couple of weeks ago and there was some real interest in migrating to wicket in place of our bloated legacy system, providing I can finish off this proof of concept that I'm working on. There is also some pressure here to do a complete re-design in asp.net so I'm really hoping to provide an alternative to doing that. If I can't get the radio group in the table working soon I'll have to abandon the wicket approach. So, any hints, help, url's to examples, etc. will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/help-with-RadioGroup-in-Table-tp18036005p18089479.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Including wicket in JSPs?
Hi Jan,
I have a legacy home-grown jsp application where I'm showing wicket pages in
the content area using an inframe tag. Initially I had a problem that
turned out to be caused by not using the closing tag for the iframe. Here's
an example that works in IE6/7:
head
style type=text/css
iframe{ float:left; height:500px; width:100%; display:block;
frameborder:0;}
/style
/head
body
jsp:include page=/leftside.jsp flush=true /
jsp:include page=/top.jsp flush=true /
iframe src=http://someserver/WicketDemoPage?someparm=somevalue;
frameborder=0/iframe
jsp:include page=/bottom.jsp flush=true /
jsp:include page=/rightside.jsp flush=true /
/body
This technique works for me with bookmarkable pages, so in the above case
the following would be put in the init() method of the Application class:
mountBookmarkablePage( /WicketDemoPage, WicketDemoPage.class );
HTH,
Jim
Jan.Koops wrote:
Hello !
We are using a JSP-based content management system for navigation, page
layout etc.
Now we're evaluating Wicket as our application framework: A Wicket
application should appear in the center of the JSP based layout and
navigation.
Has somebody already included a wicket page via jsp:include or other ways?
It seems to me a Page would be the wrong Wicket component to include,
since no body or header should be rendered.
Best regards
Jan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Including-wicket-in-JSPs--tp18071635p18072855.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
help with RadioGroup in Table
Hi All,
I have a requirement for a radio button column in a data table. When a row
is selected data from one of the columns needs to be placed in a text box on
the form. The problem is how to get the selected row to update the text
box. I've searched the forums and googled and haven't found a solution that
I can get to work. The radio buttons themselves work fine until I try to
use an event such as onSelectionChanged which then causes the selection to
be lost which has been discussed in other posts. I've read in another
similar post that using an ajax behavior is a way to deal with the issue but
I haven't been able to figure out how to do that. I'm also struggling to
get my head around the correct way to use models for the radio's. The class
in the model passed in when creating the RadioPanel containing the Radio has
a selected property that I've been trying to use for the value of the
radio.
I can get a solution to work using checkboxes but the requirement is
specifically for radio buttons in order to be compatible with the existing
JSP pages in the application. BTW, if I can pull this off there is a good
chance future application features will be implemented in Wicket with the
idea of eventually migrating the entire application to wicket.
If anyone has got something like this working I'd really appreciate some
direction.
Code snippets:
The following code is in addComponents() called from constructor:
final RadioGroup selected = new RadioGroup( selected )
// {
// @Override
// protected void onSelectionChanged( Object newSelection )
// {
// super.onSelectionChanged( newSelection );
// newSelection is always
null
// }
// @Override
// protected boolean wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications()
// {
// return true;
// }
// }
;
columns.add( new AbstractColumn( new Model( ))
{
public void populateItem( final Item cellItem, final
String componentId,
final IModel rowModel )
{
cellItem.add( new RadioPanel( componentId,
rowModel ));
}
});
AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable table = new
AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable(
table, columns, provider, 15 );
selected.add( table );
this.add( selected );
The panel with the Radio:
private class RadioPanel extends Panel
{
public RadioPanel( String id, IModel model )
{
super( id, model );
add( new Radio( select, new PropertyModel( model,
selected )));
}
}
The html for the panel:
wicket:panel
input wicket:id=select type=radio/
/wicket:panel
The html for the radio group and table:
div wicket:id=selected
table wicket:id=table/table
/div
Thanks in advance,
Jim
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/help-with-RadioGroup-in-Table-tp18036005p18036005.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dynamic updating of property file
Hi all, Does anyone know if it is possible to dynamically modify a property file or overwrite it using Wicket? The property files are all in .xml format and the keys are taken from a database when a tree is dynamically built based on the values read in. The keys are used in a StringResourceModel to provide the text for the tree nodes. On another page, the admin user can add/edit new entries and I would like to also have the new or revised key-value data items written to the property file(s) (including supported locales) at the same time. The app deployment is expanded. I know I can get the path starting with the package nameusing getAbsolutePath() on a PackageResource but I'm not sure how to get the full path from the root folder. Thanks, Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Dynamic-updating-of-property-file-tp16146867p16146867.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dynamic updating of property file
Hi All, I was able to get this to work for a tomcat deployment by adding the \WEB-INF\classes\ as shown in the code snippet below but this obviously won't work with jetty for testing and is not generic. I'm sure there must be a simple generic way to accomplish this using Wicket classes but I haven't found anything in the archives that gives me a clue. Any help in coming up with a generic solution would be appreciated! Jim Code Snippet: String propsPath = PackageResource.get( ReportsPage.class, ReportsPage.xml ).getAbsolutePath(); File file = new File ( DemoApp.get().getServletContext().getRealPath( /WEB-INF/classes/ + propsPath )); String absPath = file.getAbsolutePath(); StringBuffer sbuf = // create the xml Writer out = new BufferedWriter( new OutputStreamWriter( new FileOutputStream( absPath ), UTF8 )); out.write( sbuf.toString()); jnorris wrote: Hi all, Does anyone know if it is possible to dynamically modify a property file or overwrite it using Wicket? The property files are all in .xml format and the keys are taken from a database when a tree is dynamically built based on the values read in. The keys are used in a StringResourceModel to provide the text for the tree nodes. On another page, the admin user can add/edit new entries and I would like to also have the new or revised key-value data items written to the property file(s) (including supported locales) at the same time. The app deployment is expanded. I know I can get the path starting with the package nameusing getAbsolutePath() on a PackageResource but I'm not sure how to get the full path from the root folder. Thanks, Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Dynamic-updating-of-property-file-tp16146867p16148601.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Quickstart TestHomePage exception with AuthWebSession
Thank you Igor, that resolved the problem with the exception.
Jim
igor.vaynberg wrote:
public void setUp()
{
tester = new WicketTester(new MyApplication());
}
-igor
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:27 AM, jnorris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
The TestHomePage test class that is created by the wicket quickstart
archetype is throwing a ClassCastException when AuthenticatedWebSession
is
extended:
Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException:
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebSession
at
org.apache.wicket.authentication.AuthenticatedWebSession.get(AuthenticatedWebSession.java:43)
at com.test.MyWebSession.get(MyWebSession.java:48)
at com.test.HomePage.init(HomePage.java:21)
However running the application does not cause this exception to happen.
Do
I need to change something in that default test case? I haven't used
WicketTester before so I'm not sure if this is expected behavior since
the
page requires a role of User. However I still wouldn't expect the
class
cast exception on the .get() method. BTW, this happens with 1.3.1 and
1.3.2.
I've attached a quickstart which illustrates this.
Jim
http://www.nabble.com/file/p16049037/SessionTest.zip SessionTest.zip
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Quickstart-TestHomePage-exception-with-AuthWebSession-tp16049037p16049037.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Quickstart-TestHomePage-exception-with-AuthWebSession-tp16049037p16092058.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote] Release 1.4 with only generics and stop support for 1.3
[X] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-vote--Release-1.4-with-only-generics-and-stop-support-for-1.3-tp16090054p16096362.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quickstart TestHomePage exception with AuthWebSession
Hi everyone, The TestHomePage test class that is created by the wicket quickstart archetype is throwing a ClassCastException when AuthenticatedWebSession is extended: Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebSession at org.apache.wicket.authentication.AuthenticatedWebSession.get(AuthenticatedWebSession.java:43) at com.test.MyWebSession.get(MyWebSession.java:48) at com.test.HomePage.init(HomePage.java:21) However running the application does not cause this exception to happen. Do I need to change something in that default test case? I haven't used WicketTester before so I'm not sure if this is expected behavior since the page requires a role of User. However I still wouldn't expect the class cast exception on the .get() method. BTW, this happens with 1.3.1 and 1.3.2. I've attached a quickstart which illustrates this. Jim http://www.nabble.com/file/p16049037/SessionTest.zip SessionTest.zip -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Quickstart-TestHomePage-exception-with-AuthWebSession-tp16049037p16049037.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Page redirect behavior
Hi All, I have different behavior when using a RedirectPage which I'm trying to understand. I have a web page which has a Tree. In one case when a tree node is clicked, in the onNodeClicked() method this.setResponsePage( new RedirectPage( http.)) is called and the URL opens in the same browser window. In another case the tree node click makes visible a panel which has a form for some input parameters and a Link used for the redirect. In that panel in the onClick() method for the link this.setResponsePage( new RedirectPage( http ...)) is called and the URL is opened in a new browser window which is what I want to happen in both cases. Does anyone know why the first case opens the URL in the same browser window but the second case opens the URL in a new window? Or is there a better way to have the URL opened in an new window? Thanks, Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Page-redirect-behavior-tp16024984p16024984.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable and DropDownChoice
Thanks Martijn! Adding the ddc to a panel worked. Jim Martijn Dashorst wrote: Instead of directly adding the DDC to the column, add a panel or fragment containing the DDC. Martijn On 3/10/08, jnorris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I have implemented an AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable and would like to put a DropDownChoice in one of the columns to list values. For example in a table of users a roles column would show the roles assigned to the user as a dropdown list. I haven't been able to find any examples of doing this. If anyone has already done something like this or has any suggestions on how to do it, I'd appreciate the help. I tried to extend AbstractColumn but couldn't get it to work due to cellItem.add( ddc ) throwing an exception (Component cell must be applied to a tag of type 'select', not '' ). Thanks, Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable-and-DropDownChoice-tp15950744p15950744.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable-and-DropDownChoice-tp15950744p15976495.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable and DropDownChoice
Hi All, I have implemented an AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable and would like to put a DropDownChoice in one of the columns to list values. For example in a table of users a roles column would show the roles assigned to the user as a dropdown list. I haven't been able to find any examples of doing this. If anyone has already done something like this or has any suggestions on how to do it, I'd appreciate the help. I tried to extend AbstractColumn but couldn't get it to work due to cellItem.add( ddc ) throwing an exception (Component cell must be applied to a tag of type 'select', not '' ). Thanks, Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable-and-DropDownChoice-tp15950744p15950744.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Checkbox problem
Hi Timo, I was in the process of renaming MyModel to UserPageModel when I cut and pasted the code. Anyway I feel a bit stupid after you pointed out that I was using a Link instead of a Button and forgot that onClick() doesn't submit the form. I'm pretty much a newbie when it comes to web apps but I'm learning. Anyway the state of the checkbox is now what I would expect and it works. BTW the purpose of the checkbox was just for my testing of the DB delete operation which can either remove the row from the DB or it can mark the row as being deleted via deleted_by and date_deleted columns depending on a flag setting. I appreciate your taking time to help me. Thanks, Jim Timo Rantalaiho wrote: As it's a Link and not a Button, deleteLink might be a better name. And take on account that just clicking a Link on the Form probably doesn't submit; you should either use a FormComponent that submits the form (Button?) or add a suitable ajax behavior to the Link. Did you check how this gets rendered in the end? Declaring it as a submit input in HTML and Link in Java seems contradictory. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Checkbox-problem-tp14926922p14949388.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Checkbox problem
I have a table implemented using the example AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable which works like a charm. I also have a checkbox on the page that is created with an instance of a class that extends AbstractCheckBoxModel. The issue I am having is that the model state never changes. I have breakpoints in both the select() and unselect() methods that never get hit. The checkbox always renders as checked. In an onClick method for a button I'm retrieving the state and the value using getObject on the checkbox and it always set to true. BTW, I've scoured the user lists and tried every combination of setting the model that I saw and the issue is the same. I'd appreciate any ideas. Thanks in advance, Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Checkbox-problem-tp14926922p14926922.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
