On 02.03.2014 14:51, Bill Speirs wrote:
field in the object. However it ONLY does this when I mark the methods as
@Transactional
yes, guice creates a proxy if it needs to (and it needs to if it needs
to intercept the method call due to @Transactional).
the point is here, try wrapping a wicket
Hi Wicketeers,
crawling our logs, we found the above exception as a result of a weird
request that set the following headers on a GET request:
Content-Type: text/html; charset=auto
I don't know which UserAgent sent that, but it happened and brought the
following exception on tomcat 6.0.37:
On 10/25/2013 09:39 AM, Sven Meier wrote:
Hi Sven,
I think we have to improve Application#setPageMangerProvider():
public synchronized final void setPageManagerProvider(final
IPageManagerProvider provider)
WDYT?
better, but to my understanding, not quite there yet.
while that helps
On 22.10.2013 10:22, Sven Meier wrote:
Hi Sven,
currently there's no way to change the PageManager once it's fetched in
Application#internalGetPageManager().
agreed.
Do you have a stacktrace for the code triggering
Application.getPageManagerProvider().get() ? Besides devutils I don't
see
On 10/21/2013 09:07 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi Martin,
I hope the ticket will describe better what and the damage is done
actually means.
sorry if i was unclear. looks like i got lost in the details.
the actual damage is: there is a Thread started and associated with a
On 18.10.2013 09:03, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi Martin,
Can you give more details about the setup and the problem ?
of course. we use two Tomcat6 with clustering enabled (Backup-Manager)
with apache in front using sticky sessions.
when redeploying, we restart tomcat.
Now when one tomcat
On 14.10.2013 21:41, uwe schaefer wrote:
could it also be a
racecondition with clustering and
public void sessionUnbound(final String sessionId)
being called before init() returns?
after further investigation it is pretty clear, that the above race
condition happens (at least on tomcat6
Hi
we seem to face a little problem here with wicket 6.11:
Application.class:708
setPageManagerProvider(new DefaultPageManagerProvider(this));
sets the default provider here. Lateron [during init()] we replace this
one by using the snippet from HttpSessionDataStore's javadocs:
On 14.10.2013 21:10, uwe schaefer wrote:
Now for the question: what is the suggested way to register a
PageManagerProvider BEFORE anyone asks for it?
PS: rather than an initializer being the culprit, could it also be a
racecondition with clustering and
public void sessionUnbound(final
On 06/29/2013 03:13 PM, William Speirs wrote:
I'm strongly leaning towards the best practice of: If you're having to
create an injector in your unit test, then you're doing it wrong.
maybe it makes it worse in your perspective, but yuo might want to have
a look at jukito.
On 06/29/2013 03:49 PM, William Speirs wrote:
Another consideration is if you're using any authentication
Been there, still have the bite marks from that :-)
*g* thanks Bill, i planned to do session clustering, but have the
pagemap seperate, so that i hopefully would not run into this.
cu
On 06/29/2013 03:13 PM, William Speirs wrote:
Hi Bill,
I'm strongly leaning towards the best practice of: If you're having to
create an injector in your unit test, then you're doing it wrong.
me too. well, normally.
i came to the idea, that UI-Tests are not stricly unit-tests in most of
the
On 06/28/2013 09:19 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi Martin,
i already saw and consider your memcached-based session management, thanks.
the reason i ask the wicket mailing list is, that i assume that wicket
only needs part of the pagemap (namely the current page) to serve a
request, so that -
hi
currently the accordion in jquery-examples does not work in FF or IE.
jQuery.filter(expr, [i]).r is undefined
http://localhost:8080/resources/org.wicketstuff.jquery.accordion.JQAccordion/jquery.accordion.pack.js
Line: 1
is this known, or should i try diggin in?
about jquery anyway: i
14 matches
Mail list logo