RE: Testing concurrant updates on database

2010-10-11 Thread CREMONINI Daniele
...@carmanconsulting.com [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com] On Behalf Of James Carman Sent: 08 October 2010 12:13 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Testing concurrant updates on database What exactly are you trying to test? Are you trying to test the optimistic locking? You didn't write

Re: Testing concurrant updates on database

2010-10-11 Thread James Carman
] On Behalf Of James Carman Sent: 08 October 2010 12:13 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Testing concurrant updates on database What exactly are you trying to test?  Are you trying to test the optimistic locking?  You didn't write that.  If you want to test that you actually have

RE: Testing concurrant updates on database

2010-10-11 Thread CREMONINI Daniele
] On Behalf Of James Carman Sent: 11 October 2010 10:09 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Testing concurrant updates on database You're really not supposed to be monkeying with the version property yourself. You're supposed to let the ORM provider do that. What I would do is create a hidden field

Re: Testing concurrant updates on database

2010-10-08 Thread James Carman
What exactly are you trying to test? Are you trying to test the optimistic locking? You didn't write that. If you want to test that you actually have optimistic locking turned on, then you can do that by checking the metadata. On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:27 AM, CREMONINI Daniele