Nope, 1.5
Well, I am not quite sure that my statement is correct. while tree
project has some kind of examples, there are no real documentation.
Let's consieder
http://www.mysticcoders.com/blog/autocomplete-with-an-object/ - my
opinion is that sometimes one may want to make an impression
Alex,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Alex Shubert alex.shub...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope, 1.5
Well, I am not quite sure that my statement is correct. while tree
project has some kind of examples, there are no real documentation.
Let's consieder
Sven while you are here:
why no documentation for Tree? Nothing at all? Right now I face a
problem - tree do not persist it's state (Bookmarcable links, copied
from example) and I have no clue where to see.
On 21 August 2012 21:38, Sven Meier s...@meiers.net wrote:
And the winner is ... Martin!
Hi,
These components have been merged in Wicket 6.
You can see the demo at
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples-6.0.x/tree
and the code in org.apache.wicket.extensions.markup.html.repeater.tree
package in wicket-extensions module.
The javadocs are also improved.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at
Are you using wicket-tree or the new components in Wicket 6?
Please be more specific what information you're looking for. I'll gladly
provide more info in javadoc or in the wiki.
Sven
Alex Shubert alex.shub...@gmail.com schrieb:
Sven while you are here:
why no documentation for Tree? Nothing
Use StatelessForm instead.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Alex Shubert alex.shub...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
Recently I found wicket tree control
http://wicket-tree.appspot.com/nested
and one there is a thing I can't understand: while the page contains
Form it looks like not versioned. I
They are using
FormVoid form = new FormVoid(form);
and still no version in url on round-trips. Also, FilterForm from
Wicket API doesn't extends StatelessForm while your answer states that
must be the case.
On 21 August 2012 14:20, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Use StatelessForm
The deployed examples use Wicket 1.4.
http://wicket-tree.appspot.com/?wicket:interface=:0:1:::
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Alex Shubert alex.shub...@gmail.com wrote:
They are using
FormVoid form = new FormVoid(form);
and still no version in url on round-trips. Also, FilterForm from
Martin
with all my respect but their build script uses
dependency
groupIdorg.apache.wicket/groupId
artifactIdwicket-core/artifactId
version${wicket.version}/version
/dependency
Sorry for being stubborn but having '?wicket:interface=:0:1:::' in the
url means that this is Wicket pre-1.5 ;-)
I guess Sven will join this conversation later today and explain in
more details.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Alex Shubert alex.shub...@gmail.com wrote:
Martin
with all my
Martin,
http://wicket-tree.googlecode.com/svn/repo/wicket-tree/wicket-tree-parent/0.5.0/wicket-tree-parent-0.5.0.pom
Again, no 1.4 at all. Not in one place. Moreover,
'?wicket:interface=:0:1:::' doesn't means 1.4 is in action. Just take
a look at event listener implementation.
About the problem:
The tree node selections are fully handled by ajax requests, so they
will (obviously) never change the url of the page. Change the selection
of e.g. the dropdown for Content, and you will see that the url
changes.
There are ways to have forms without version/id information in the URL.
Search this
It's obvious that selection of leafs (implemented as
BookmarcableLinks) is NOT handled by Ajax.
BookmarkableFolderContent.java : 62
PageParameters parameters = new
PageParameters();
parameters.add(foo, foo.getId());
The Google Code repo contains 1.5 but the deployed app is using pre-1.5 version.
I can bet on this.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Alex Shubert alex.shub...@gmail.com wrote:
Martin,
http://wicket-tree.googlecode.com/svn/repo/wicket-tree/wicket-tree-parent/0.5.0/wicket-tree-parent-0.5.0.pom
Martin,
does it really makes any difference? Lack of stateless navigation does
( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1086 )
Anyway, I explained solution in my prev letter. Thanks!
On 21 August 2012 16:59, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
The Google Code repo contains 1.5 but
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Alex Shubert alex.shub...@gmail.com wrote:
Martin,
does it really makes any difference? Lack of stateless navigation does
( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1086 )
I'm not sure what you mean by referring to this ticket. I guess you
just found out
And the winner is ... Martin!
On AppEngine I still have Wicket 1.4.x running.
Sven
On 08/21/2012 02:59 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
The Google Code repo contains 1.5 but the deployed app is using pre-1.5 version.
I can bet on this.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Alex Shubert
17 matches
Mail list logo