Re: (Igor) page without class
huh?
the current approach is seterrorpage(class), this is
the page wicket will show when there is an error
it can be changed to: seterrorpage(irequesttarget target) and become
more flexible.
you can use seterrorpage(new pagerequesttarget(page.class)) to achieve
the same as what there is now, or seterrorpage(new
redirectrequesttarget("error.html")); to go to a static html page.
or did i miss something in your response?
-igor
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Alex Rass wrote:
>
>
> You could also create an interface to EVERY class in Wicket (as OO
> suggests). ;)
> Is there a point in doing it though?
> If you are NOT handling something - let Tomcat(or whomever) deal with it!
> Works GREAT for me, btw. 1/2 of my pages are static + all the image
> resources and other crap. This behavior is the default, btw.
>
> Why waste a CPU on serving static stuff that you do NOT want "handled" or
> "massaged"? Your container will do a better job at it anyways. (see the
> papers on tomcat and jetty competing on that point alone!) Let them deal
> with it.
>
> And if you DO want it handled - one can write a StaticContentPage class
> (overwrite page handling methods in WebPage class).
> Unless you just wanna serve it from ELSEWHERE, in which case - just
> configure the apps server, like with any other j2ee project.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 3:50 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: page without class
>
> add an rfe to have it changed to take an irequesttarget instead of a
> page class, that way you can do whatever you want.
>
> -igor
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Frank Silbermann
> wrote:
>> I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised if the answer is no.
>>
>> A foundational assumption about the way Wicket works is that a WebPage
>> object would result from the combination of a WebPage class with a
>> matching HTML file. When Wicket sees MyPage.html in MyPackage with no
>> matching class, it assumes the class is erroneously missing. You want
>> instead that Wicket should assume the class:
>>
>> package MyPackage
>> class MyPage extends org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WebPage {}
>>
>> I don't think the convenience of avoiding this two-line MyPage.java file
>> justifies eliminating this error check.
>>
>> I suppose Wicket could provide an API command to tell it to assume a
>> trivial MyPage.java for MyPage.html, but I don't think such an API call
>> would save you all that many keystrokes over the two-line class
>> definition.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: fachhoch [mailto:fachh...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 12:12 PM
>> To: users@wicket.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: page without class
>>
>>
>> I am asking about creating a wicket page without a class , can I create
>> a
>> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WebPage instance without any additional
>> java file just html ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> insom wrote:
>>>
>>> I believe you can do this if you change the Wicket filter mapping in
>> your
>>> web.xml to something other than /*. Then Tomcat will serve the page
>> and
>>> bypass Wicket entirely.
>>>
>>> Dane
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:36 AM, fachhoch wrote:
>>>
Ok I have to tell that page to my IApplicationSettings
IApplicationSettings settings=
super.getApplicationSettings();
settings.setAccessDeniedPage(accessDeniedPage)
here accessDeniedPage page is a static html page and I dont need java
>> .
I am talking about a wicket page without a class just html is it
possible
?
Pedro H. O. dos Santos wrote:
>
> Only put then on top-level directory of a web module.
> http://java.sun.com/javaee/5/docs/tutorial/doc/bnadx.html#bnadz
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:21 PM, tubin gen
>> wrote:
>
>> can I create a page just with html and not write class ? I need
>> some
>> static
>> html pages and writing java for those will be of no use .
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/page-without-class-tp26338268p26339453.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/page-without-class-tp26338268p26340879.html
>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>> -
RE:(Igor) page without class
You could also create an interface to EVERY class in Wicket (as OO
suggests). ;)
Is there a point in doing it though?
If you are NOT handling something - let Tomcat(or whomever) deal with it!
Works GREAT for me, btw. 1/2 of my pages are static + all the image
resources and other crap. This behavior is the default, btw.
Why waste a CPU on serving static stuff that you do NOT want "handled" or
"massaged"? Your container will do a better job at it anyways. (see the
papers on tomcat and jetty competing on that point alone!) Let them deal
with it.
And if you DO want it handled - one can write a StaticContentPage class
(overwrite page handling methods in WebPage class).
Unless you just wanna serve it from ELSEWHERE, in which case - just
configure the apps server, like with any other j2ee project.
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 3:50 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: page without class
add an rfe to have it changed to take an irequesttarget instead of a
page class, that way you can do whatever you want.
-igor
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Frank Silbermann
wrote:
> I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised if the answer is no.
>
> A foundational assumption about the way Wicket works is that a WebPage
> object would result from the combination of a WebPage class with a
> matching HTML file. When Wicket sees MyPage.html in MyPackage with no
> matching class, it assumes the class is erroneously missing. You want
> instead that Wicket should assume the class:
>
> package MyPackage
> class MyPage extends org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WebPage {}
>
> I don't think the convenience of avoiding this two-line MyPage.java file
> justifies eliminating this error check.
>
> I suppose Wicket could provide an API command to tell it to assume a
> trivial MyPage.java for MyPage.html, but I don't think such an API call
> would save you all that many keystrokes over the two-line class
> definition.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: fachhoch [mailto:fachh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 12:12 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: page without class
>
>
> I am asking about creating a wicket page without a class , can I create
> a
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WebPage instance without any additional
> java file just html ?
>
>
>
>
> insom wrote:
>>
>> I believe you can do this if you change the Wicket filter mapping in
> your
>> web.xml to something other than /*. Then Tomcat will serve the page
> and
>> bypass Wicket entirely.
>>
>> Dane
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:36 AM, fachhoch wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Ok I have to tell that page to my IApplicationSettings
>>>
>>> IApplicationSettings settings=
>>> super.getApplicationSettings();
>>> settings.setAccessDeniedPage(accessDeniedPage)
>>> here accessDeniedPage page is a static html page and I dont need java
> .
>>> I am talking about a wicket page without a class just html is it
>>> possible
>>> ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Pedro H. O. dos Santos wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Only put then on top-level directory of a web module.
>>> > http://java.sun.com/javaee/5/docs/tutorial/doc/bnadx.html#bnadz
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:21 PM, tubin gen
> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> can I create a page just with html and not write class ? I need
> some
>>> >> static
>>> >> html pages and writing java for those will be of no use .
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://old.nabble.com/page-without-class-tp26338268p26339453.html
>>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/page-without-class-tp26338268p26340879.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
