Re: 302 vs. 301 Redirect

2007-12-06 Thread Johan Compagner
what is the right way for a permanent redirect in the servlet spec? do it all yourself? Including making the url fully qualified? On Dec 6, 2007 9:49 AM, Joe Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wasn't suggesting changing the functionality of setRedirect, but instead maybe adding

Re: 302 vs. 301 Redirect

2007-12-05 Thread Gwyn Evans
I think the one thread was Consistent homepage URL from 2005Q2 - I think the gist was that in the scenario there, it wasn't desirable having the redirected URL becoming the one that the search engines would always go to. /Gwyn On 04/12/2007, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Long long

302 vs. 301 Redirect

2007-12-04 Thread Joe Toth
When you setRedirect(true), wicket does a 302, temporary, redirect. The basic rule of thumb in SEO is if you want to pass all authority to a different page use 301 (permanent). http://www.seotoday.com/browse.php/category/articles/id/477/index.php Thoughts on adding something to Wicket to support

Re: 302 vs. 301 Redirect

2007-12-04 Thread Johan Compagner
Long long time ago we had discussions about this, i think also related to what google expects. I guess what we now have is a result of that. But i cant remember what the pros and cons are 2007/12/4, Joe Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED]: When you setRedirect(true), wicket does a 302, temporary, redirect.