Re: 302 vs. 301 Redirect
Exactly, a fully qualified url.. We dont have that so if that is needed then we have first another problem 2007/12/7, Joe Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I think so...something like > > res.setHeader("Location", "http://301redirect.com/ ); > res.setStatus(301); > > > On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 15:43 +0100, Johan Compagner wrote: > > what is the right way for a permanent redirect in the servlet spec? > > do it all yourself? Including making the url fully qualified? > > > > On Dec 6, 2007 9:49 AM, Joe Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I wasn't suggesting changing the functionality of setRedirect, but > > > instead maybe adding setPermanentRedirect(true) or another way for > > > wicket to be able to perform a 301. > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 13:43 +, Gwyn Evans wrote: > > > > I think the one thread was "Consistent homepage URL" from 2005Q2 - I > > > > think the gist was that in the scenario there, it wasn't desirable > > > > having the redirected URL becoming the one that the search engines > > > > would always go to. > > > > > > > > /Gwyn > > > > > > > > On 04/12/2007, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Long long time ago we had discussions about this, i think also > related > > > > > to what google expects. I guess what we now have is a result of > that. > > > > > But i cant remember what the pros and cons are > > > > > > > > > > 2007/12/4, Joe Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > When you setRedirect(true), wicket does a 302, temporary, > redirect. > > > The > > > > > > basic rule of thumb in SEO is if you want to pass all authority to > a > > > > > > different page use 301 (permanent). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.seotoday.com/browse.php/category/articles/id/477/index.php > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts on adding something to Wicket to support this > > > functionality? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 302 vs. 301 Redirect
I think so...something like res.setHeader("Location", "http://301redirect.com/ ); res.setStatus(301); On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 15:43 +0100, Johan Compagner wrote: > what is the right way for a permanent redirect in the servlet spec? > do it all yourself? Including making the url fully qualified? > > On Dec 6, 2007 9:49 AM, Joe Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I wasn't suggesting changing the functionality of setRedirect, but > > instead maybe adding setPermanentRedirect(true) or another way for > > wicket to be able to perform a 301. > > > > > > On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 13:43 +, Gwyn Evans wrote: > > > I think the one thread was "Consistent homepage URL" from 2005Q2 - I > > > think the gist was that in the scenario there, it wasn't desirable > > > having the redirected URL becoming the one that the search engines > > > would always go to. > > > > > > /Gwyn > > > > > > On 04/12/2007, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Long long time ago we had discussions about this, i think also related > > > > to what google expects. I guess what we now have is a result of that. > > > > But i cant remember what the pros and cons are > > > > > > > > 2007/12/4, Joe Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > When you setRedirect(true), wicket does a 302, temporary, redirect. > > The > > > > > basic rule of thumb in SEO is if you want to pass all authority to a > > > > > different page use 301 (permanent). > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.seotoday.com/browse.php/category/articles/id/477/index.php > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts on adding something to Wicket to support this > > functionality? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 302 vs. 301 Redirect
what is the right way for a permanent redirect in the servlet spec? do it all yourself? Including making the url fully qualified? On Dec 6, 2007 9:49 AM, Joe Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wasn't suggesting changing the functionality of setRedirect, but > instead maybe adding setPermanentRedirect(true) or another way for > wicket to be able to perform a 301. > > > On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 13:43 +, Gwyn Evans wrote: > > I think the one thread was "Consistent homepage URL" from 2005Q2 - I > > think the gist was that in the scenario there, it wasn't desirable > > having the redirected URL becoming the one that the search engines > > would always go to. > > > > /Gwyn > > > > On 04/12/2007, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Long long time ago we had discussions about this, i think also related > > > to what google expects. I guess what we now have is a result of that. > > > But i cant remember what the pros and cons are > > > > > > 2007/12/4, Joe Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > When you setRedirect(true), wicket does a 302, temporary, redirect. > The > > > > basic rule of thumb in SEO is if you want to pass all authority to a > > > > different page use 301 (permanent). > > > > > > > > > http://www.seotoday.com/browse.php/category/articles/id/477/index.php > > > > > > > > Thoughts on adding something to Wicket to support this > functionality? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Re: 302 vs. 301 Redirect
I wasn't suggesting changing the functionality of setRedirect, but instead maybe adding setPermanentRedirect(true) or another way for wicket to be able to perform a 301. On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 13:43 +, Gwyn Evans wrote: > I think the one thread was "Consistent homepage URL" from 2005Q2 - I > think the gist was that in the scenario there, it wasn't desirable > having the redirected URL becoming the one that the search engines > would always go to. > > /Gwyn > > On 04/12/2007, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Long long time ago we had discussions about this, i think also related > > to what google expects. I guess what we now have is a result of that. > > But i cant remember what the pros and cons are > > > > 2007/12/4, Joe Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > When you setRedirect(true), wicket does a 302, temporary, redirect. The > > > basic rule of thumb in SEO is if you want to pass all authority to a > > > different page use 301 (permanent). > > > > > > http://www.seotoday.com/browse.php/category/articles/id/477/index.php > > > > > > Thoughts on adding something to Wicket to support this functionality? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 302 vs. 301 Redirect
I think the one thread was "Consistent homepage URL" from 2005Q2 - I think the gist was that in the scenario there, it wasn't desirable having the redirected URL becoming the one that the search engines would always go to. /Gwyn On 04/12/2007, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Long long time ago we had discussions about this, i think also related > to what google expects. I guess what we now have is a result of that. > But i cant remember what the pros and cons are > > 2007/12/4, Joe Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > When you setRedirect(true), wicket does a 302, temporary, redirect. The > > basic rule of thumb in SEO is if you want to pass all authority to a > > different page use 301 (permanent). > > > > http://www.seotoday.com/browse.php/category/articles/id/477/index.php > > > > Thoughts on adding something to Wicket to support this functionality? > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Download Wicket 1.3.0-rc1 now! - http://wicketframework.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 302 vs. 301 Redirect
Long long time ago we had discussions about this, i think also related to what google expects. I guess what we now have is a result of that. But i cant remember what the pros and cons are 2007/12/4, Joe Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > When you setRedirect(true), wicket does a 302, temporary, redirect. The > basic rule of thumb in SEO is if you want to pass all authority to a > different page use 301 (permanent). > > http://www.seotoday.com/browse.php/category/articles/id/477/index.php > > Thoughts on adding something to Wicket to support this functionality? > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
302 vs. 301 Redirect
When you setRedirect(true), wicket does a 302, temporary, redirect. The basic rule of thumb in SEO is if you want to pass all authority to a different page use 301 (permanent). http://www.seotoday.com/browse.php/category/articles/id/477/index.php Thoughts on adding something to Wicket to support this functionality? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]