AW: PropertyModels *without* strings

2009-11-26 Thread Giambalvo, Christian
Lombok looks preety cool. I think i will use it cause it saves a lot of typing and holds equals and hashcode in sync. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Gerolf Seitz [mailto:gerolf.se...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. November 2009 19:36 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re:

AW: PropertyModels *without* strings

2009-11-25 Thread Giambalvo, Christian
Is refactoring available for bindgen? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. November 2009 22:56 An: users@wicket.apache.org; d...@wicket.apache.org Betreff: PropertyModels *without* strings

AW: PropertyModels *without* strings

2009-11-25 Thread Giambalvo, Christian
Ok thanks. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Gerolf Seitz [mailto:gerolf.se...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. November 2009 08:19 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: PropertyModels *without* strings as far as i have read, the binding methods aren't automatically refactored (eg.

AW: PropertyModels *without* strings

2009-11-25 Thread Giambalvo, Christian
You're right, it's an improvment. And will use it. I just wanted to know is refactoring is supported. Anyway it's a nice thing. Thanks for that :) Greets -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. November 2009 08:44 An: