Hi,
Is there a reason why CheckGroup.updateModel() does not call
setModelObject()? If I create Checkgroup with the following
CheckGroup myCheckGroup = new CheckGroup(id, new Model() { public Object
getObject() { return whatever;}});
Later on - call to myCheckGroup.getModelObject() returns
Ritesh,
There is no need for the else block in the code you have included to call
setModelObject as it will only be exercised if there is a collection set
already.
Double check that somewhere in your code you are not explicitly or
implicitly setting the modelObject to null or setting the model
Cemel,
Yes, it does make sense in that respect - as the original collection is
modified. But the fact that setObject() method of the underlying model is
not called, when the object is set, is the problem I am referring to. I had
overridden getObject() and setObject() of the adapter Model class
Ritesh,
I wouldn't call it a bug because the model is updated, albeit indirectly,
but perhaps in a slightly inconsistent way as you've pointed out (no
setModel call), in the name of optimisation (ie reusing the existing
collection) and functional consistency (the implementation of the collection
Cemal, I think you may be a closet Lisp programmer :-)
jk
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:32:00PM -0700, jWeekend wrote:
Ritesh,
I wouldn't call it a bug because the model is updated, albeit indirectly,
but perhaps in a slightly inconsistent way as you've pointed out (no
setModel call), in
John,
It'd be news to me too!
BTW, you probably spotted the typo:
(no setModel call) should say (no setModelObject call).
Regards - Cemal http://www.jWeekend.co.uk
http://jWeekend.co.uk
John Krasnay wrote:
Cemal, I think you may be a closet Lisp programmer :-)
jk
On Thu, Aug 21,
